Internet Publication of Administrative Seizure and Forfeiture Notices, 6527-6529 [2012-2842]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(j) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–09, dated May 13, 2011;
and Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–35–05,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011; for
related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
26, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–2912 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 162
[Docket No. USCBP–2011–0022]
RIN 1651–AA94
Internet Publication of Administrative
Seizure and Forfeiture Notices
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCIES:
This rule proposes to amend
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) regulations to allow for
publication of notices of seizure and
intent to forfeit on an official
Government forfeiture Web site. CBP
anticipates that the changes proposed in
this rule would reduce administrative
costs and improve the effectiveness of
CBP’s notice procedures as Internet
publication would reach a broader range
of the public and provide access to more
parties who may have an interest in the
seized property.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket Number USCBP–
2011–0022, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via docket number USCBP–2011–0022.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade,
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
799 9th Street NW. (Mint Annex),
Washington, DC 20229–1179.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected during
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 799 9th Street NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325–
0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis McKenzie, Director, Fines,
Penalties and Forfeitures Division,
Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, (202) 344–1808.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
General
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) has authority to seize property
violating certain laws enforced or
administered by CBP or U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE). Such seized property may be
forfeited and disposed of in a manner
specified by applicable provisions of
law. Generally, these forfeiture statutes
authorize the government to take
possession of and legally acquire title to
the seized property. Under the CBP
forfeiture procedure, a party may assert
a claim to the seized property through
judicial or administrative proceedings.
Applicable Law and Regulations
Section 607 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, authorizes CBP to
implement administrative forfeiture
procedures under prescribed
circumstances. 19 U.S.C. 1607. The
statute requires CBP to publish notice of
seizure and intent to forfeit for at least
three successive weeks, in such manner
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6527
as the Secretary of the Treasury directs.1
CBP is also required to issue written
notice of the seizure and forfeiture to
each party who appears to have an
interest in the seized property. The
written notice must contain information
on the applicable procedures.
CBP regulations set forth the current
procedure that CBP must follow when it
seizes and gives notice of intent to
forfeit property under administrative
forfeiture proceedings, as required
under 19 U.S.C. 1607. 19 CFR 162.45.
These procedures apply when CBP
seizes: (1) A prohibited importation; (2)
a transporting conveyance if used to
import, export, transport or store a
controlled substance or listed chemical;
(3) any monetary instrument within the
meaning of 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(3); or (4)
any conveyance, merchandise, or
baggage, the value of which does not
exceed $500,000 (19 CFR 162.45(a)).
CBP regulations provide two different
methods to notify the public of seized
property based on the appraised value
of the property. First, for seized
property appraised at more than $5,000,
CBP must publish administrative
seizure and forfeiture notices for at least
three successive weeks in a newspaper
circulated at the customs port and in the
judicial district where CBP seized the
property. 19 CFR 162.45(b)(1). CBP also
notifies all known parties-in-interest in
advance of the pending newspaper
publication and the expected dates of
publication of the notice. For seized
property appraised at $5,000 or less,
CBP accomplishes publication by
posting a notice in a conspicuous place
accessible to the public at the
customhouse nearest the place of
seizure. 19 CFR 162.45(b)(2). The notice
shows the date of posting and remains
posted for at least three successive
weeks.
Proposed Amendments
This notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) proposes to revise the manner
by which CBP provides notice of intent
to forfeit seized property appraised at
more than $5,000 and seized property
appraised at $5,000 or less. First, this
rule proposes that CBP (including the
U.S. Border Patrol where appropriate)
would utilize the Department of Justice
(DOJ) forfeiture Web site, located at
https://www.forfeiture.gov, to post
seizure and forfeiture notices for
property appraised in excess of $5,000
in value for 30 consecutive days. This
DOJ Web site currently contains a
comprehensive list of pending notices of
1 The Secretary of the Treasury has delegated this
authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security
pursuant to Treasury Department Order 100–16.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
6528
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
civil and criminal forfeiture actions in
various district courts and Federal
Government agencies. Under this
NPRM, CBP would no longer need to
publish administrative seizure and
forfeiture notices for three successive
weeks in a newspaper circulated at the
customs port and in the judicial district
where CBP seized the property. CBP
would notify all known parties-ininterest of the Web site posting and the
expected date of publication.
This NPRM also proposes that CBP
will publish seizure and forfeiture
notices for seized property appraised at
$5,000 or less on the DOJ forfeiture Web
site for 30 consecutive days. This
additional notice would not replace the
current procedure of CBP posting notice
at the customhouse nearest the place of
seizure. However, this rule proposes to
specify that in situations where U.S.
Border Patrol agents make the seizure,
the posting will be at the appropriate
U.S. Border Patrol sector office.
CBP believes that the use of Internet
publication for CBP seizure and
forfeiture notices would provide notice
to a broader range of the public without
the geographical limitations that exist
under the current procedure’s reliance
solely on local print publications or
customhouse postings. In addition, the
Internet posting would be available for
a longer period of time (30 days),
compared to the minimum statutory
requirement of three weeks.
This NPRM proposes that CBP may
publish, at its sole discretion and as
circumstances warrant, additional
notice in a print medium for at least
three successive weeks. For example,
CBP may publish a notice of seizure and
forfeiture in a newspaper in general
circulation at the port and the judicial
district nearest the seizure, or with
wider or national circulation, when
recommended by the pertinent U.S.
Attorney’s office or court of jurisdiction.
Additionally, CBP may decide to
publish notice of seizure and forfeiture
in a non-English language or other
community newspaper to ensure
reaching a particular community that
may have a particular interest in or
connection to the seizure. Similarly,
CBP may elect to publish notice of
seizure and forfeiture in a trade or
industry publication that serves a
particular commercial community to
ensure reaching a party when it is
difficult to identify a vessel or other
conveyance owner.
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has not been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
However, CBP has prepared the
following analysis to help inform
stakeholders of the potential impacts of
this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would provide a
less costly alternative for publishing
notices of seizure and forfeiture for
seized property appraised at more than
$5,000 in value. The current regulation
requires CBP to publish such notices in
a local newspaper for at least three
successive weeks. Historically, there
have been some instances where the
cost of advertising exceeds the value of
the seized property, and these
occurrences have increased as the cost
of newspaper advertising has increased.
Under this proposed rule, CBP would
publish the great majority of seizure and
forfeiture notices for property valued at
more than $5,000 (estimated at 90
percent) for 30 consecutive days solely
by posting on an existing government
Web site. In some cases, either at CBP’s
sole discretion based on the particular
circumstances involved or where a court
or a U.S. Attorney instructs or
recommends, CBP would publish notice
via both print (newspaper or other
publication) and Internet methods. CBP
will use an existing DOJ Web site that
lists government forfeiture actions by
various agencies. In 2010, CBP spent
over $1 million advertising more than
6,000 lines of property. Under this rule,
CBP would advertise the vast majority
of items using the DOJ Web site, which
would be virtually cost-free. CBP would
advertise only a small number of items
both on the Internet and in a traditional
newspaper or other publication.
Because these items will be the highest
profile items, CBP will likely advertise
these items in large circulations or
national newspapers. Such advertising
will make up a disproportionate amount
of the costs. We estimate that it will cost
$300,000 to continue to advertise these
items in print. Therefore, we estimate
that advertising on the Internet instead
of in print for most items will save the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
government approximately $700,000 per
year.
This NPRM also proposes that CBP
will publish seizure and forfeiture
notices for seized property appraised at
$5,000 or less on the DOJ forfeiture Web
site for 30 consecutive days. This
proposed change would simply add
low-cost Internet publication to the
current requirement that CBP post
notice at the customhouse (or U.S.
Border Patrol sector office, as proposed
in this rule) for seized property
appraised at $5,000 or less. This change
would be virtually costless to the
government and would expand the
reach of the seizure and forfeiture notice
to the benefit of unknown parties-ininterest and the public.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of
the rule on small entities as required by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
603), as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness
Act of 1996. A small entity may be a
small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated
business not dominant in its field that
qualifies as a small business per the
Small Business Act); a small not-forprofit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
This rule would move most notices of
seizure and forfeiture valued at more
than $5,000 from local print media to a
national Web site. It would also allow
CBP to post notices of seizures and
forfeitures valued at $5,000 or less on
the Web in addition to posting at the
customhouse nearest the place of
seizure or the appropriate sector office
of the U.S. Border Patrol. This rule
would not impose any requirements on
the general public or small businesses.
As provided under the current
procedure, CBP would continue to
contact any small business that is a
known party-in-interest. Because this
rule imposes no direct costs on small
entities, we believe that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Consequently, DHS certifies
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This notice of proposed rulemaking
will not impose an unfunded mandate
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995. It will not result in costs
of $100 million or more, in the
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
aggregate, to any of the following: State,
local, or Native American Tribal
governments, or the private sector.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (Federalism), this notice of
proposed rulemaking will have no
substantial effect on the States, the
current Federal-State relationship, or on
the current distribution of power and
responsibilities among local officials.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(b)(1).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 162
Administrative practice and
procedure, Law enforcement, Seizures
and forfeitures.
Proposed Amendment to CBP
Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, Part
162 of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR part 162), is
proposed to be amended as set forth
below:
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
1. The general authority citation for
part 162 and the specific authority
citation for § 162.45 continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66,
1592, 1593a, 1624; 6 U.S.C. 101; 8 U.S.C.
1324(b).
*
*
*
*
*
Section 162.45 also issued under 19
U.S.C. 1607, 1608;
*
*
*
*
*
2. In § 162.45, paragraphs (b)(1) and
(2) are revised to read as follows:
§ 162.45 Summary forfeiture; Property
other than Schedule I and Schedule II
controlled substances; Notice of seizure
and sale.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
(b) Publication. (1) If the appraised
value of any property in one seizure
from one person, other than Schedule I
and Schedule II controlled substances
(as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and 812),
exceeds $5,000, the notice will be
published by its posting on an official
Government forfeiture Web site for at
least 30 consecutive days. In CBP’s sole
discretion, and as circumstances
warrant, additional publication for at
least three successive weeks in a print
medium may be provided. All known
parties-in-interest will be notified of the
pending location and date of
publication.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
Dated: February 2, 2012.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–2842 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
PART 162—INSPECTION, SEARCH,
AND SEIZURE
*
(2) In all other cases, except for
Schedule I and Schedule II controlled
substances (see § 162.45a), the notice
will be published by its posting on an
official Government forfeiture Web site
for at least 30 consecutive days and by
its posting for at least three successive
weeks in a conspicuous place that is
accessible to the public at the
customhouse located nearest the place
of seizure or the appropriate sector
office of the U.S. Border Patrol. All
known parties-in-interest will be
notified of the pending location and
date of publication. The posting at the
customhouse or sector office will
contain the date of posting. Articles of
small value of the same class or kind
included in two or more seizures will be
advertised as one unit.
*
*
*
*
*
[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0084–201167(b);
FRL–9628–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Alabama,
Georgia, and Tennessee: Chattanooga;
Particulate Matter 2002 Base Year
Emissions Inventory
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 2002
base year emissions inventory portion of
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the States of
Alabama on July 31, 2009, Georgia on
October 27, 2009, and Tennessee on
October 15, 2009. The emissions
inventory is part of the Chattanooga,
Alabama-Georgia-Tennessee, PM2.5
attainment demonstrations that were
submitted for the 1997 annual PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. This action is being taken
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act. In the Final Rules Section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the
State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6529
Written comments must be
received on or before March 9, 2012.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2011–0084 by one of the following
methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2011–
0084,’’ Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal
holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9043.
Mr. Lakeman can be reached via
electronic mail at
lakeman.sean@epa.gov.
For
additional information see the direct
final rule which is published in the
Rules Section of this Federal Register.
A detailed rationale for the approval is
set forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in
response to this rule, no further activity
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this
document. Any parties interested in
commenting on this document should
do so at this time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6527-6529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2842]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 162
[Docket No. USCBP-2011-0022]
RIN 1651-AA94
Internet Publication of Administrative Seizure and Forfeiture
Notices
AGENCIES: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to amend the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to allow for publication of notices of
seizure and intent to forfeit on an official Government forfeiture Web
site. CBP anticipates that the changes proposed in this rule would
reduce administrative costs and improve the effectiveness of CBP's
notice procedures as Internet publication would reach a broader range
of the public and provide access to more parties who may have an
interest in the seized property.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number USCBP-
2011-0022, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments via docket number
USCBP-2011-0022.
Mail: Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, 799 9th Street NW. (Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229-1179.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments
may also be inspected during regular business days between the hours of
9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, 799 9th Street NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by
calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325-0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McKenzie, Director, Fines,
Penalties and Forfeitures Division, Office of Field Operations, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, (202) 344-1808.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
General
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has authority to seize
property violating certain laws enforced or administered by CBP or U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Such seized property may be
forfeited and disposed of in a manner specified by applicable
provisions of law. Generally, these forfeiture statutes authorize the
government to take possession of and legally acquire title to the
seized property. Under the CBP forfeiture procedure, a party may assert
a claim to the seized property through judicial or administrative
proceedings.
Applicable Law and Regulations
Section 607 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, authorizes CBP
to implement administrative forfeiture procedures under prescribed
circumstances. 19 U.S.C. 1607. The statute requires CBP to publish
notice of seizure and intent to forfeit for at least three successive
weeks, in such manner as the Secretary of the Treasury directs.\1\ CBP
is also required to issue written notice of the seizure and forfeiture
to each party who appears to have an interest in the seized property.
The written notice must contain information on the applicable
procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Secretary of the Treasury has delegated this authority
to the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to Treasury
Department Order 100-16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP regulations set forth the current procedure that CBP must
follow when it seizes and gives notice of intent to forfeit property
under administrative forfeiture proceedings, as required under 19
U.S.C. 1607. 19 CFR 162.45. These procedures apply when CBP seizes: (1)
A prohibited importation; (2) a transporting conveyance if used to
import, export, transport or store a controlled substance or listed
chemical; (3) any monetary instrument within the meaning of 31 U.S.C.
5312(a)(3); or (4) any conveyance, merchandise, or baggage, the value
of which does not exceed $500,000 (19 CFR 162.45(a)).
CBP regulations provide two different methods to notify the public
of seized property based on the appraised value of the property. First,
for seized property appraised at more than $5,000, CBP must publish
administrative seizure and forfeiture notices for at least three
successive weeks in a newspaper circulated at the customs port and in
the judicial district where CBP seized the property. 19 CFR
162.45(b)(1). CBP also notifies all known parties-in-interest in
advance of the pending newspaper publication and the expected dates of
publication of the notice. For seized property appraised at $5,000 or
less, CBP accomplishes publication by posting a notice in a conspicuous
place accessible to the public at the customhouse nearest the place of
seizure. 19 CFR 162.45(b)(2). The notice shows the date of posting and
remains posted for at least three successive weeks.
Proposed Amendments
This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposes to revise the
manner by which CBP provides notice of intent to forfeit seized
property appraised at more than $5,000 and seized property appraised at
$5,000 or less. First, this rule proposes that CBP (including the U.S.
Border Patrol where appropriate) would utilize the Department of
Justice (DOJ) forfeiture Web site, located at https://www.forfeiture.gov, to post seizure and forfeiture notices for property
appraised in excess of $5,000 in value for 30 consecutive days. This
DOJ Web site currently contains a comprehensive list of pending notices
of
[[Page 6528]]
civil and criminal forfeiture actions in various district courts and
Federal Government agencies. Under this NPRM, CBP would no longer need
to publish administrative seizure and forfeiture notices for three
successive weeks in a newspaper circulated at the customs port and in
the judicial district where CBP seized the property. CBP would notify
all known parties-in-interest of the Web site posting and the expected
date of publication.
This NPRM also proposes that CBP will publish seizure and
forfeiture notices for seized property appraised at $5,000 or less on
the DOJ forfeiture Web site for 30 consecutive days. This additional
notice would not replace the current procedure of CBP posting notice at
the customhouse nearest the place of seizure. However, this rule
proposes to specify that in situations where U.S. Border Patrol agents
make the seizure, the posting will be at the appropriate U.S. Border
Patrol sector office.
CBP believes that the use of Internet publication for CBP seizure
and forfeiture notices would provide notice to a broader range of the
public without the geographical limitations that exist under the
current procedure's reliance solely on local print publications or
customhouse postings. In addition, the Internet posting would be
available for a longer period of time (30 days), compared to the
minimum statutory requirement of three weeks.
This NPRM proposes that CBP may publish, at its sole discretion and
as circumstances warrant, additional notice in a print medium for at
least three successive weeks. For example, CBP may publish a notice of
seizure and forfeiture in a newspaper in general circulation at the
port and the judicial district nearest the seizure, or with wider or
national circulation, when recommended by the pertinent U.S. Attorney's
office or court of jurisdiction. Additionally, CBP may decide to
publish notice of seizure and forfeiture in a non-English language or
other community newspaper to ensure reaching a particular community
that may have a particular interest in or connection to the seizure.
Similarly, CBP may elect to publish notice of seizure and forfeiture in
a trade or industry publication that serves a particular commercial
community to ensure reaching a party when it is difficult to identify a
vessel or other conveyance owner.
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. However, CBP has prepared the following analysis to help
inform stakeholders of the potential impacts of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would provide a less costly alternative for
publishing notices of seizure and forfeiture for seized property
appraised at more than $5,000 in value. The current regulation requires
CBP to publish such notices in a local newspaper for at least three
successive weeks. Historically, there have been some instances where
the cost of advertising exceeds the value of the seized property, and
these occurrences have increased as the cost of newspaper advertising
has increased.
Under this proposed rule, CBP would publish the great majority of
seizure and forfeiture notices for property valued at more than $5,000
(estimated at 90 percent) for 30 consecutive days solely by posting on
an existing government Web site. In some cases, either at CBP's sole
discretion based on the particular circumstances involved or where a
court or a U.S. Attorney instructs or recommends, CBP would publish
notice via both print (newspaper or other publication) and Internet
methods. CBP will use an existing DOJ Web site that lists government
forfeiture actions by various agencies. In 2010, CBP spent over $1
million advertising more than 6,000 lines of property. Under this rule,
CBP would advertise the vast majority of items using the DOJ Web site,
which would be virtually cost-free. CBP would advertise only a small
number of items both on the Internet and in a traditional newspaper or
other publication. Because these items will be the highest profile
items, CBP will likely advertise these items in large circulations or
national newspapers. Such advertising will make up a disproportionate
amount of the costs. We estimate that it will cost $300,000 to continue
to advertise these items in print. Therefore, we estimate that
advertising on the Internet instead of in print for most items will
save the government approximately $700,000 per year.
This NPRM also proposes that CBP will publish seizure and
forfeiture notices for seized property appraised at $5,000 or less on
the DOJ forfeiture Web site for 30 consecutive days. This proposed
change would simply add low-cost Internet publication to the current
requirement that CBP post notice at the customhouse (or U.S. Border
Patrol sector office, as proposed in this rule) for seized property
appraised at $5,000 or less. This change would be virtually costless to
the government and would expand the reach of the seizure and forfeiture
notice to the benefit of unknown parties-in-interest and the public.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of the rule on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603), as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996.
A small entity may be a small business (defined as any independently
owned and operated business not dominant in its field that qualifies as
a small business per the Small Business Act); a small not-for-profit
organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer
than 50,000 people).
This rule would move most notices of seizure and forfeiture valued
at more than $5,000 from local print media to a national Web site. It
would also allow CBP to post notices of seizures and forfeitures valued
at $5,000 or less on the Web in addition to posting at the customhouse
nearest the place of seizure or the appropriate sector office of the
U.S. Border Patrol. This rule would not impose any requirements on the
general public or small businesses. As provided under the current
procedure, CBP would continue to contact any small business that is a
known party-in-interest. Because this rule imposes no direct costs on
small entities, we believe that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Consequently, DHS certifies this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This notice of proposed rulemaking will not impose an unfunded
mandate under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It will not
result in costs of $100 million or more, in the
[[Page 6529]]
aggregate, to any of the following: State, local, or Native American
Tribal governments, or the private sector.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with the principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism), this notice of proposed rulemaking
will have no substantial effect on the States, the current Federal-
State relationship, or on the current distribution of power and
responsibilities among local officials.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(b)(1).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 162
Administrative practice and procedure, Law enforcement, Seizures
and forfeitures.
Proposed Amendment to CBP Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, Part 162 of title 19 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (19 CFR part 162), is proposed to be amended as
set forth below:
PART 162--INSPECTION, SEARCH, AND SEIZURE
1. The general authority citation for part 162 and the specific
authority citation for Sec. 162.45 continue to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1592, 1593a, 1624; 6
U.S.C. 101; 8 U.S.C. 1324(b).
* * * * *
Section 162.45 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1607, 1608;
* * * * *
2. In Sec. 162.45, paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 162.45 Summary forfeiture; Property other than Schedule I and
Schedule II controlled substances; Notice of seizure and sale.
* * * * *
(b) Publication. (1) If the appraised value of any property in one
seizure from one person, other than Schedule I and Schedule II
controlled substances (as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and 812), exceeds
$5,000, the notice will be published by its posting on an official
Government forfeiture Web site for at least 30 consecutive days. In
CBP's sole discretion, and as circumstances warrant, additional
publication for at least three successive weeks in a print medium may
be provided. All known parties-in-interest will be notified of the
pending location and date of publication.
(2) In all other cases, except for Schedule I and Schedule II
controlled substances (see Sec. 162.45a), the notice will be published
by its posting on an official Government forfeiture Web site for at
least 30 consecutive days and by its posting for at least three
successive weeks in a conspicuous place that is accessible to the
public at the customhouse located nearest the place of seizure or the
appropriate sector office of the U.S. Border Patrol. All known parties-
in-interest will be notified of the pending location and date of
publication. The posting at the customhouse or sector office will
contain the date of posting. Articles of small value of the same class
or kind included in two or more seizures will be advertised as one
unit.
* * * * *
Dated: February 2, 2012.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-2842 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P