Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration, 6625-6626 [2012-2777]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices
proposed new location for the Anaheim
Regional Transportation Intermodal
Center (ARTIC) is an approximately 19acre site in the City of Anaheim, along
the existing OCTA railroad right-of-way.
The ARTIC will include an intermodal
terminal, public plaza drop-off area,
stadium pavilion, track and platforms,
road improvements, surface parking,
and surface access. A pedestrian bridge
will be built for crossing Katella Avenue
between the project and Honda Center.
Final agency actions: No use of Section
4(f) resources; Section 106 finding of no
adverse effect; project-level air quality
conformity; and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), dated
January 2012. Supporting
documentation: Environmental
Assessment, dated September 2011.
Issued on: February 3, 2012.
Lucy Garliauskas,
Associate Administrator for Planning and
Environment, Washington, DC.
[FR Doc. 2012–2901 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 15)]
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice of decision instituting a
proceeding to determine the railroad
industry’s 2011 cost of capital.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Board is instituting a
proceeding to determine the railroad
industry’s cost of capital for 2011. The
decision solicits comments on the
following narrow issues: (1) The
railroads’ 2011 current cost of debt
capital; (2) the railroads’ 2011 current
cost of preferred equity capital (if any);
(3) the railroads’ 2011 cost of common
equity capital; and (4) the 2011 capital
structure mix of the railroad industry on
a market value basis. Comments should
focus on the various cost of capital
components listed above using the same
methodology followed in Railroad Cost
of Capital—2010, EP 558 (Sub-No. 14)
(STB served Oct. 3, 2011).
DATES: Notices of intent to participate
are due by March 9, 2012. Statements of
the railroads are due by March 30, 2012.
Statements of other interested persons
are due by April 19, 2012. Rebuttal
statements by the railroads are due by
May 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted either via the Board’s e-filing
system or in the traditional paper
format. Any person using e-filing should
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245–0333.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877–8339.
The
Board’s decision is posted on the
Board’s Web site, https://
www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision
may be purchased by contacting the
Board’s Office of Public Assistance,
Governmental Affairs, and Compliance
at (202) 245–0238. Assistance for the
hearing impaired is available through
FIRS at (800) 877–8339.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment of the conservation of
energy resources.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).
Railroad Cost of Capital—2011
SUMMARY:
comply with the instructions at the E–
FILING link on the Board’s Web site, at
https://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person
submitting a filing in the traditional
paper format should send an original
and 10 copies to: Surface Transportation
Board, Attn: Docket No. EP 558 (SubNo. 15), 395 E Street SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001.
Decided: February 2, 2012.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner
Begeman.
Raina S. White,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012–2851 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
Release of Waybill Data
The Surface Transportation Board has
received a request from Baker & Miller
PLLC on behalf of the Kansas City
Southern (WB595–9—1/27/12), for
permission to use certain data from the
Board’s 2010 Carload Waybill Samples.
A copy of this request may be obtained
from the Office of Economics.
The waybill sample contains
confidential railroad and shipper data;
therefore, if any parties object to these
requests, they should file their
objections with the Director of the
Board’s Office of Economics within 14
calendar days of the date of this notice.
The rules for release of waybill data are
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6625
Contact: Marcin Skomial, (202) 245–
0344.
Raina S. White,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012–2804 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic
Influenza: Ethical Guidance for
Leaders and Health Care Professionals
in the Veterans Health Administration
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Notice and Request for
Comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) through its National Center
for Ethics in Health Care (NCEHC)
invites interested parties to comment on
a guidance document entitled ‘‘Meeting
the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza:
Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health
Care Professionals in the Veterans
Health Administration.’’ (Guidance). VA
is committed to an open and engaged
stakeholder process and welcomes input
on how to improve the Guidance and
integrate key ethical concepts into
ongoing emergency response planning
in VA.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand
delivery to the Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘Meeting the
Challenge of Pandemic Influenza:
Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health
Care Professionals in the Veterans
Health Administration.’’ Copies of
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 461–4902 (this is not a toll-free
number) for an appointment. In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Virginia A. Sharpe, Medical Ethicist,
Veterans Health Administration,
National Center for Ethics in Health
Care, (10P6), 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
6626
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Washington DC, 20420, Telephone:
(202) 461–4020 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
November 2005, the White House
released the National Strategy for
Pandemic Influenza to guide
preparedness and response to an
influenza pandemic, with the intent of
(1) stopping, slowing or otherwise
limiting the spread of a pandemic to the
United States; (2) limiting the domestic
spread of a pandemic, and mitigating
disease, suffering and death; and (3)
sustaining infrastructure and mitigating
impact to the economy and the
functioning of society.’’ The strategy is
organized around 3 pillars:
Preparedness & Communication,
Surveillance & Detection, and Response
& Containment. These pillars have been
used to prepare for multiple influenza
threats, such as H5N1 avian influenza.
It also guided the government’s
response to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
In the National Strategy, the White
House identified Federal
responsibilities for the development of
guidance and response planning during
a severe flu pandemic, including
guidance for the allocation of scarce
health and medical resources. As part of
this task, VA’s National Center for
Ethics in Health Care developed a
Guidance document to provide a
framework for decision making in VHA
about three major ethical challenges
related to a severe pandemic influenza.
Those challenges are: (1) How can
health care providers and the institution
as a whole meet the obligation to
provide care during an infectious
disease outbreak? Specifically, what
steps can the institution take to
minimize risk to health care workers, so
that they can continue coming to work
to assist in patient care? (2) How can
decision makers ethically allocate scarce
resources? Specifically what steps are
needed to ensure that decision making
is transparent, reasonable, and fair? (3)
How can decision makers take steps to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
limit the spread of disease but at the
same time ensure the least restrictions
on individual liberties? As the largest
health care system in the United States,
VA elected to address these difficult
issues to ensure that VA is prepared to
respond thoughtfully and consistently
to severe and widespread health crises.
For each of these challenges, the
Guidance presents ethical principles
and national guidance for VHA. The
expectation is that VA leadership and
health care professionals will use this
information in pandemic workforce,
communications, and patient care
planning and response.
The Guidance has received feedback
from VA clinicians and administrators
as well as experts outside of VA.
Because the Guidance document is
anticipated to affect patients, their
families, staff, and the VA community
as a whole, the NCEHC is inviting
Veterans, members of the general public
and interested parties from relevant
Federal, State, and professional bodies
to provide feedback through written
comments. The goal of this Notice is to
ensure that people who may be directly
affected during a severe influenza
pandemic have an opportunity to
contribute to the development of ethical
concepts and processes that will guide
VA emergency planning. VA is aware
that there are no perfect approaches to
managing a catastrophe, but we still
believe that with forward thinking and
incorporation of broad public input and
lessons learned from the 2009 H1N1
pandemic, we can develop the best
possible, most scientifically- and
ethically-informed approaches. We
believe this approach, led by VA, stands
the best chance of developing a sound
model to serve as framework for other
public and private healthcare
organizations on a national scale and
beyond.
Comments are invited in response to
the following:
1. Does the Guidance include the
range of ethical issues relevant to
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
pandemic influenza planning and
response that are of concern to you? Are
there other issues that you would like to
see addressed in the VA Guidance?
2. Does the Guidance support the
needs of Veterans with regard to fair
treatment during a public health crisis?
3. Does the Guidance support the
needs of health care workers with regard
to fair treatment during a public health
crisis?
4. The Guidance presents a team
process for allocation of scarce
lifesaving resources based on illness
severity, the likelihood of benefiting
from treatment, and resource
availability. Apart from maintaining
accountability for an established
decision process, the rationale for a
team-based approach is to allow
individual health care providers to
maintain their focus treating individual
patients. Do you think that this is a good
and fair approach to making these
difficult decisions?
5. Do you think that the key ethical
concepts presented in the Guidance for
pandemic influenza planning and
response can also be used in VA’s
planning for other highly contagious
illnesses? If so, are there important
differences that we should keep in
mind?
Any other comments/observations
regarding the Guidance are welcome.
Availability: Persons with access to
the Internet may obtain the document
at: https://www.ethics.va.gov/activities/
pandemic_influenza_preparedness.asp.
Alternatively, the guidance may be
obtained by mail by calling NCEHC at
(202) 501–0364 (this is not a toll-free
number).
Dated: February 2, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management,
Office of the General Counsel Department
of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012–2777 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6625-6626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2777]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for
Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health
Administration
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) through its National
Center for Ethics in Health Care (NCEHC) invites interested parties to
comment on a guidance document entitled ``Meeting the Challenge of
Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care
Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration.'' (Guidance). VA
is committed to an open and engaged stakeholder process and welcomes
input on how to improve the Guidance and integrate key ethical concepts
into ongoing emergency response planning in VA.
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand delivery to the Director,
Regulations Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202)
273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response
to ``Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for
Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health
Administration.'' Copies of comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 (this is
not a toll-free number) for an appointment. In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia A. Sharpe, Medical Ethicist,
Veterans Health Administration, National Center for Ethics in Health
Care, (10P6), 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
[[Page 6626]]
Washington DC, 20420, Telephone: (202) 461-4020 (this is not a toll-
free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In November 2005, the White House released
the National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza to guide preparedness and
response to an influenza pandemic, with the intent of (1) stopping,
slowing or otherwise limiting the spread of a pandemic to the United
States; (2) limiting the domestic spread of a pandemic, and mitigating
disease, suffering and death; and (3) sustaining infrastructure and
mitigating impact to the economy and the functioning of society.'' The
strategy is organized around 3 pillars: Preparedness & Communication,
Surveillance & Detection, and Response & Containment. These pillars
have been used to prepare for multiple influenza threats, such as H5N1
avian influenza. It also guided the government's response to the 2009
H1N1 pandemic.
In the National Strategy, the White House identified Federal
responsibilities for the development of guidance and response planning
during a severe flu pandemic, including guidance for the allocation of
scarce health and medical resources. As part of this task, VA's
National Center for Ethics in Health Care developed a Guidance document
to provide a framework for decision making in VHA about three major
ethical challenges related to a severe pandemic influenza. Those
challenges are: (1) How can health care providers and the institution
as a whole meet the obligation to provide care during an infectious
disease outbreak? Specifically, what steps can the institution take to
minimize risk to health care workers, so that they can continue coming
to work to assist in patient care? (2) How can decision makers
ethically allocate scarce resources? Specifically what steps are needed
to ensure that decision making is transparent, reasonable, and fair?
(3) How can decision makers take steps to limit the spread of disease
but at the same time ensure the least restrictions on individual
liberties? As the largest health care system in the United States, VA
elected to address these difficult issues to ensure that VA is prepared
to respond thoughtfully and consistently to severe and widespread
health crises. For each of these challenges, the Guidance presents
ethical principles and national guidance for VHA. The expectation is
that VA leadership and health care professionals will use this
information in pandemic workforce, communications, and patient care
planning and response.
The Guidance has received feedback from VA clinicians and
administrators as well as experts outside of VA. Because the Guidance
document is anticipated to affect patients, their families, staff, and
the VA community as a whole, the NCEHC is inviting Veterans, members of
the general public and interested parties from relevant Federal, State,
and professional bodies to provide feedback through written comments.
The goal of this Notice is to ensure that people who may be directly
affected during a severe influenza pandemic have an opportunity to
contribute to the development of ethical concepts and processes that
will guide VA emergency planning. VA is aware that there are no perfect
approaches to managing a catastrophe, but we still believe that with
forward thinking and incorporation of broad public input and lessons
learned from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, we can develop the best possible,
most scientifically- and ethically-informed approaches. We believe this
approach, led by VA, stands the best chance of developing a sound model
to serve as framework for other public and private healthcare
organizations on a national scale and beyond.
Comments are invited in response to the following:
1. Does the Guidance include the range of ethical issues relevant
to pandemic influenza planning and response that are of concern to you?
Are there other issues that you would like to see addressed in the VA
Guidance?
2. Does the Guidance support the needs of Veterans with regard to
fair treatment during a public health crisis?
3. Does the Guidance support the needs of health care workers with
regard to fair treatment during a public health crisis?
4. The Guidance presents a team process for allocation of scarce
lifesaving resources based on illness severity, the likelihood of
benefiting from treatment, and resource availability. Apart from
maintaining accountability for an established decision process, the
rationale for a team-based approach is to allow individual health care
providers to maintain their focus treating individual patients. Do you
think that this is a good and fair approach to making these difficult
decisions?
5. Do you think that the key ethical concepts presented in the
Guidance for pandemic influenza planning and response can also be used
in VA's planning for other highly contagious illnesses? If so, are
there important differences that we should keep in mind?
Any other comments/observations regarding the Guidance are welcome.
Availability: Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the
document at: https://www.ethics.va.gov/activities/pandemic_influenza_preparedness.asp. Alternatively, the guidance may be obtained by mail
by calling NCEHC at (202) 501-0364 (this is not a toll-free number).
Dated: February 2, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel
Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-2777 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P