Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration, 6625-6626 [2012-2777]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices proposed new location for the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) is an approximately 19acre site in the City of Anaheim, along the existing OCTA railroad right-of-way. The ARTIC will include an intermodal terminal, public plaza drop-off area, stadium pavilion, track and platforms, road improvements, surface parking, and surface access. A pedestrian bridge will be built for crossing Katella Avenue between the project and Honda Center. Final agency actions: No use of Section 4(f) resources; Section 106 finding of no adverse effect; project-level air quality conformity; and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), dated January 2012. Supporting documentation: Environmental Assessment, dated September 2011. Issued on: February 3, 2012. Lucy Garliauskas, Associate Administrator for Planning and Environment, Washington, DC. [FR Doc. 2012–2901 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE: P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 15)] Surface Transportation Board. Notice of decision instituting a proceeding to determine the railroad industry’s 2011 cost of capital. AGENCY: ACTION: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the railroad industry’s cost of capital for 2011. The decision solicits comments on the following narrow issues: (1) The railroads’ 2011 current cost of debt capital; (2) the railroads’ 2011 current cost of preferred equity capital (if any); (3) the railroads’ 2011 cost of common equity capital; and (4) the 2011 capital structure mix of the railroad industry on a market value basis. Comments should focus on the various cost of capital components listed above using the same methodology followed in Railroad Cost of Capital—2010, EP 558 (Sub-No. 14) (STB served Oct. 3, 2011). DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due by March 9, 2012. Statements of the railroads are due by March 30, 2012. Statements of other interested persons are due by April 19, 2012. Rebuttal statements by the railroads are due by May 9, 2012. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board’s e-filing system or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing should tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:54 Feb 07, 2012 Jkt 226001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245–0333. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339. The Board’s decision is posted on the Board’s Web site, https:// www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the Board’s Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245–0238. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at (800) 877–8339. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment of the conservation of energy resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a). Railroad Cost of Capital—2011 SUMMARY: comply with the instructions at the E– FILING link on the Board’s Web site, at https://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should send an original and 10 copies to: Surface Transportation Board, Attn: Docket No. EP 558 (SubNo. 15), 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423–0001. Decided: February 2, 2012. By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Begeman. Raina S. White, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2012–2851 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board Release of Waybill Data The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Baker & Miller PLLC on behalf of the Kansas City Southern (WB595–9—1/27/12), for permission to use certain data from the Board’s 2010 Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics. The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board’s Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9. PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6625 Contact: Marcin Skomial, (202) 245– 0344. Raina S. White, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2012–2804 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915–01–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration Department of Veterans Affairs. Notice and Request for Comments. AGENCY: ACTION: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) through its National Center for Ethics in Health Care (NCEHC) invites interested parties to comment on a guidance document entitled ‘‘Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration.’’ (Guidance). VA is committed to an open and engaged stakeholder process and welcomes input on how to improve the Guidance and integrate key ethical concepts into ongoing emergency response planning in VA. DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before April 9, 2012. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https:// www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand delivery to the Director, Regulations Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ‘‘Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration.’’ Copies of comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 (this is not a toll-free number) for an appointment. In addition, during the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management System at https://www.Regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia A. Sharpe, Medical Ethicist, Veterans Health Administration, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, (10P6), 810 Vermont Avenue NW., SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1 6626 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Washington DC, 20420, Telephone: (202) 461–4020 (this is not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In November 2005, the White House released the National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza to guide preparedness and response to an influenza pandemic, with the intent of (1) stopping, slowing or otherwise limiting the spread of a pandemic to the United States; (2) limiting the domestic spread of a pandemic, and mitigating disease, suffering and death; and (3) sustaining infrastructure and mitigating impact to the economy and the functioning of society.’’ The strategy is organized around 3 pillars: Preparedness & Communication, Surveillance & Detection, and Response & Containment. These pillars have been used to prepare for multiple influenza threats, such as H5N1 avian influenza. It also guided the government’s response to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. In the National Strategy, the White House identified Federal responsibilities for the development of guidance and response planning during a severe flu pandemic, including guidance for the allocation of scarce health and medical resources. As part of this task, VA’s National Center for Ethics in Health Care developed a Guidance document to provide a framework for decision making in VHA about three major ethical challenges related to a severe pandemic influenza. Those challenges are: (1) How can health care providers and the institution as a whole meet the obligation to provide care during an infectious disease outbreak? Specifically, what steps can the institution take to minimize risk to health care workers, so that they can continue coming to work to assist in patient care? (2) How can decision makers ethically allocate scarce resources? Specifically what steps are needed to ensure that decision making is transparent, reasonable, and fair? (3) How can decision makers take steps to VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:42 Feb 07, 2012 Jkt 226001 limit the spread of disease but at the same time ensure the least restrictions on individual liberties? As the largest health care system in the United States, VA elected to address these difficult issues to ensure that VA is prepared to respond thoughtfully and consistently to severe and widespread health crises. For each of these challenges, the Guidance presents ethical principles and national guidance for VHA. The expectation is that VA leadership and health care professionals will use this information in pandemic workforce, communications, and patient care planning and response. The Guidance has received feedback from VA clinicians and administrators as well as experts outside of VA. Because the Guidance document is anticipated to affect patients, their families, staff, and the VA community as a whole, the NCEHC is inviting Veterans, members of the general public and interested parties from relevant Federal, State, and professional bodies to provide feedback through written comments. The goal of this Notice is to ensure that people who may be directly affected during a severe influenza pandemic have an opportunity to contribute to the development of ethical concepts and processes that will guide VA emergency planning. VA is aware that there are no perfect approaches to managing a catastrophe, but we still believe that with forward thinking and incorporation of broad public input and lessons learned from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, we can develop the best possible, most scientifically- and ethically-informed approaches. We believe this approach, led by VA, stands the best chance of developing a sound model to serve as framework for other public and private healthcare organizations on a national scale and beyond. Comments are invited in response to the following: 1. Does the Guidance include the range of ethical issues relevant to PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 pandemic influenza planning and response that are of concern to you? Are there other issues that you would like to see addressed in the VA Guidance? 2. Does the Guidance support the needs of Veterans with regard to fair treatment during a public health crisis? 3. Does the Guidance support the needs of health care workers with regard to fair treatment during a public health crisis? 4. The Guidance presents a team process for allocation of scarce lifesaving resources based on illness severity, the likelihood of benefiting from treatment, and resource availability. Apart from maintaining accountability for an established decision process, the rationale for a team-based approach is to allow individual health care providers to maintain their focus treating individual patients. Do you think that this is a good and fair approach to making these difficult decisions? 5. Do you think that the key ethical concepts presented in the Guidance for pandemic influenza planning and response can also be used in VA’s planning for other highly contagious illnesses? If so, are there important differences that we should keep in mind? Any other comments/observations regarding the Guidance are welcome. Availability: Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at: https://www.ethics.va.gov/activities/ pandemic_influenza_preparedness.asp. Alternatively, the guidance may be obtained by mail by calling NCEHC at (202) 501–0364 (this is not a toll-free number). Dated: February 2, 2012. Robert C. McFetridge, Director, Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel Department of Veterans Affairs. [FR Doc. 2012–2777 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6625-6626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2777]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for 
Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health 
Administration

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) through its National 
Center for Ethics in Health Care (NCEHC) invites interested parties to 
comment on a guidance document entitled ``Meeting the Challenge of 
Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for Leaders and Health Care 
Professionals in the Veterans Health Administration.'' (Guidance). VA 
is committed to an open and engaged stakeholder process and welcomes 
input on how to improve the Guidance and integrate key ethical concepts 
into ongoing emergency response planning in VA.

DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before April 9, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand delivery to the Director, 
Regulations Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 
273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response 
to ``Meeting the Challenge of Pandemic Influenza: Ethical Guidance for 
Leaders and Health Care Professionals in the Veterans Health 
Administration.'' Copies of comments received will be available for 
public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, 
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 (this is 
not a toll-free number) for an appointment. In addition, during the 
comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal 
Docket Management System at https://www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia A. Sharpe, Medical Ethicist, 
Veterans Health Administration, National Center for Ethics in Health 
Care, (10P6), 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,

[[Page 6626]]

Washington DC, 20420, Telephone: (202) 461-4020 (this is not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In November 2005, the White House released 
the National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza to guide preparedness and 
response to an influenza pandemic, with the intent of (1) stopping, 
slowing or otherwise limiting the spread of a pandemic to the United 
States; (2) limiting the domestic spread of a pandemic, and mitigating 
disease, suffering and death; and (3) sustaining infrastructure and 
mitigating impact to the economy and the functioning of society.'' The 
strategy is organized around 3 pillars: Preparedness & Communication, 
Surveillance & Detection, and Response & Containment. These pillars 
have been used to prepare for multiple influenza threats, such as H5N1 
avian influenza. It also guided the government's response to the 2009 
H1N1 pandemic.
    In the National Strategy, the White House identified Federal 
responsibilities for the development of guidance and response planning 
during a severe flu pandemic, including guidance for the allocation of 
scarce health and medical resources. As part of this task, VA's 
National Center for Ethics in Health Care developed a Guidance document 
to provide a framework for decision making in VHA about three major 
ethical challenges related to a severe pandemic influenza. Those 
challenges are: (1) How can health care providers and the institution 
as a whole meet the obligation to provide care during an infectious 
disease outbreak? Specifically, what steps can the institution take to 
minimize risk to health care workers, so that they can continue coming 
to work to assist in patient care? (2) How can decision makers 
ethically allocate scarce resources? Specifically what steps are needed 
to ensure that decision making is transparent, reasonable, and fair? 
(3) How can decision makers take steps to limit the spread of disease 
but at the same time ensure the least restrictions on individual 
liberties? As the largest health care system in the United States, VA 
elected to address these difficult issues to ensure that VA is prepared 
to respond thoughtfully and consistently to severe and widespread 
health crises. For each of these challenges, the Guidance presents 
ethical principles and national guidance for VHA. The expectation is 
that VA leadership and health care professionals will use this 
information in pandemic workforce, communications, and patient care 
planning and response.
    The Guidance has received feedback from VA clinicians and 
administrators as well as experts outside of VA. Because the Guidance 
document is anticipated to affect patients, their families, staff, and 
the VA community as a whole, the NCEHC is inviting Veterans, members of 
the general public and interested parties from relevant Federal, State, 
and professional bodies to provide feedback through written comments. 
The goal of this Notice is to ensure that people who may be directly 
affected during a severe influenza pandemic have an opportunity to 
contribute to the development of ethical concepts and processes that 
will guide VA emergency planning. VA is aware that there are no perfect 
approaches to managing a catastrophe, but we still believe that with 
forward thinking and incorporation of broad public input and lessons 
learned from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, we can develop the best possible, 
most scientifically- and ethically-informed approaches. We believe this 
approach, led by VA, stands the best chance of developing a sound model 
to serve as framework for other public and private healthcare 
organizations on a national scale and beyond.
    Comments are invited in response to the following:
    1. Does the Guidance include the range of ethical issues relevant 
to pandemic influenza planning and response that are of concern to you? 
Are there other issues that you would like to see addressed in the VA 
Guidance?
    2. Does the Guidance support the needs of Veterans with regard to 
fair treatment during a public health crisis?
    3. Does the Guidance support the needs of health care workers with 
regard to fair treatment during a public health crisis?
    4. The Guidance presents a team process for allocation of scarce 
lifesaving resources based on illness severity, the likelihood of 
benefiting from treatment, and resource availability. Apart from 
maintaining accountability for an established decision process, the 
rationale for a team-based approach is to allow individual health care 
providers to maintain their focus treating individual patients. Do you 
think that this is a good and fair approach to making these difficult 
decisions?
    5. Do you think that the key ethical concepts presented in the 
Guidance for pandemic influenza planning and response can also be used 
in VA's planning for other highly contagious illnesses? If so, are 
there important differences that we should keep in mind?
    Any other comments/observations regarding the Guidance are welcome.
    Availability: Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the 
document at: https://www.ethics.va.gov/activities/pandemic_influenza_preparedness.asp. Alternatively, the guidance may be obtained by mail 
by calling NCEHC at (202) 501-0364 (this is not a toll-free number).

    Dated: February 2, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel 
Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-2777 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.