Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters, 5991-5994 [2012-1118]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0005; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–091–AD; Amendment
39–16914; AD 2012–01–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting an
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
Eurocopter France (ECF) Model
AS332L2 helicopter and superseding an
AD for the Model EC225LP helicopter.
This AD is prompted by the
manufacturer issuing additional
corrective action to prevent failure of
the main gearbox (MGB) due to the
degradation of the epicyclic module of
the MGB and expands the applicability
to include the ECF Model AS332L2
helicopter because an investigation
showed a failure within the epicyclic
reduction gear module resulted in the
rupture of the MGB case and separation
of the main rotor head of a model
AS332L2 helicopter in 2009. These
actions are intended to prevent failure
of the MGB and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
February 22, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of February 22, 2012.
We must receive comments on this
AD by April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Feb 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, Texas 75052, telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax
(972) 641–3775, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao
Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Policy Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone:
(817) 222–4389; fax: (817) 222–5961,
email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments prior to it becoming effective.
However, we invite you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that resulted from
adopting this AD. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the AD, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this rulemaking during the
comment period. We will consider all
the comments we receive and may
conduct additional rulemaking based on
those comments.
Discussion
We issued Emergency AD (EAD)
2009–09–51 on April 17, 2009, to all
known owners and operators of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5991
Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopter,
and published that EAD as Amendment
39–16101 (74 FR 65679, December 11,
2009) to require determining whether or
not the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light on the
instrument panel had previously
illuminated. If the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light
had illuminated because of a metal
particle on the chip detector of the
module, or if you could not determine
from the maintenance records which
‘‘CHIP’’ detector caused the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light to illuminate, or if the
chip detector light stayed illuminated
after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was
turned to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting,
you are required to replace the module
with an airworthy module before further
flight. You are also required, before
further flight, to inspect the MGB
module magnetic ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
electrical circuit and determine whether
the system is functioning properly,
including whether the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
light annunciates on the instrument
panel. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in failure of the MGB and
loss of control of the helicopter.
Since issuing that AD, we have
determined the AD should also apply to
the Model AS332L2 helicopters. We
have also determined that we
incorrectly described a part as
‘‘magnetic plug’’, and the correct
nomenclature is ‘‘chip detector.’’
Finally, we have determined that
modifying the chip collector and
inspecting the chip detector should be
required to enhance the early detection
capability of the chip detectors of the
gearbox sump and the epicyclic module.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Emergency AD
No. 2009–0099–E, dated April 23, 2009
(EAD No. 2009–0099–E), which
supersedes AD No. 2009–0087–E, dated
April 11, 2009 and AD No. 2009–0095–
E, dated April 17, 2009, to correct an
unsafe condition for the Eurocopter
Model AS332L2 and EC225LP
helicopters. EASA advises that early
investigations showed that a failure
within the epicyclic reduction gear
module of the MGB resulted in the
rupture of the MGB case, which allowed
the main rotor head to separate from the
helicopter.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of France and
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, their
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5992
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued two Emergency
Alert Service Bulletins (EASBs) with
four numbers: No. 05.00.81 for FAA
type-certificated Model AS332L2
helicopters; No. 05.00.58 for non-FAA
type-certificated military Model
AS532A2 and U2 helicopters; No.
05A016 for non-FAA type-certificated
military Model EC725AP helicopters;
and No. 05A017 for FAA typecertificated Model EC225LP helicopters.
Both EASBs are Revision 2, and are
dated April 23, 2009. The EASBs
specify checking the chip detector on
the MGB epicyclic module, modifying
the main module chip collector,
reidentifying the chip collector, and
installing the chip collector (MOD
0752522). EASA classified these EASBs,
or later approved versions, as
mandatory and issued EAD No. 2009–
0099–E to ensure continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
AD Requirements
This AD requires:
• Determining from the maintenance
records whether, within the last 200
hours time-in-service (TIS), the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light illuminated because of a
metal particle on the chip detector of
the module, and if so, whether the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light stayed
illuminated after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
switch was turned to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’
setting to activate the ‘‘fuzz burn-off’’
feature.
• If the maintenance records indicate
that the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light
illuminated because of a metal particle
on the chip detector of the module, and
the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light stayed
illuminated after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
switch was turned to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’
setting, replace the module with an
airworthy module before further flight.
• If the maintenance records do not
indicate which ‘‘CHIP’’ detector caused
the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light to illuminate,
or whether the detector light stayed
illuminated after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
switch was turned to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’
setting, replace the module with an
airworthy module before further flight.
• Inspecting the MGB module
magnetic chip detector electrical circuit
and determining whether the system is
functioning properly, including whether
the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light annunciates
on the instrument panel (Vehicle
Monitoring System Screen).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Feb 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Thereafter, if the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
light illuminates, stays illuminated after
the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch is turned to
the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting, and there is
a metal particle on the epicyclic module
chip detector, (rather than the main
reduction gear (lower MGB), the flared
housing (mast assembly), the
intermediate gearbox, or the tail rotor
gearbox chip detectors) that caused the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light to illuminate,
replace the module with an airworthy
module.
• Unless accomplished previously,
within 50 hours TIS, remove, modify,
reidentify, and reinstall the chip
collector.
• Before installing a MGB on any
Eurocopter Model AS332L2 or EC225LP
helicopter, modify, reidentify, and
reinstall the chip collector in
accordance with paragraph (f)(3) of this
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
EASA AD
The differences between this AD and
the EASA AD are:
• We use the term ‘‘hours time-inservice’’ rather than ‘‘flight hours’’ to
describe compliance times.
• We use the term ‘‘chip detector’’
rather than ‘‘magnetic plug’’ to refer to
the same part.
• If it is determined that within the
past 200 hours TIS a ‘‘CHIP’’ light was
caused by a particle in the module, we
require replacing the module with an
airworthy module rather than inspecting
it and returning the same module to
service.
• We do not mandate a calendar time
for complying with this AD.
• The EASA AD specifies, for
Eurocopter Model AS332L2 helicopters,
checking the chip detector of the
module after the last flight of the day,
not to exceed 10 hours TIS, and for the
Model EC225LP helicopters, complying
with the maintenance manual each time
a particle is detected. This AD requires
treating both models the same, since
both models have the same type of chip
detectors and anticipate compliance
with ‘‘normal’’ maintenance procedures
each time a particle is detected after
accomplishing paragraph (f)(3) of this
AD.
• We do not require returning
unairworthy parts or found particles to
the manufacturer.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 4
helicopters of U.S. registry. We estimate
that it will take about 1.0 work hour to
inspect maintenance records to
determine if a ‘‘CHIP’’ light illuminated
within the past 200 hours TIS; 10 work-
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
hours to remove, inspect, and replace a
module; 14 work-hours to remove,
modify, and replace the module to
incorporate the ‘‘CHIP’’ collector and
flange modifications (MOD 0752522);
and 0.2 work-hour, per inspection, to
conduct the initial and repetitive
inspection of the chip detector for metal
particles. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour, and we estimate it will
cost $85 to inspect the maintenance
records; $850 to remove, inspect, and
replace a module; $1,190 to incorporate
MOD 0752522; and $408 to inspect the
chip detector (assumes 24 inspections
per year per helicopter), for an
estimated total labor cost of $2,533 per
helicopter. Required parts cost is
approximately $512,318 to replace a
module. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators is $522,450, assuming all
required inspections and modifications
are completed on all helicopters and 1
helicopter requires a module
replacement
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
The short compliance time involved
is required because the previously
described critical unsafe condition can
adversely affect both the structural
integrity and controllability of the
helicopter. Therefore, because the
determination of the ‘‘CHIP’’ light
illumination, inspection, and
replacement of the module (on
condition) are required before further
flight, this AD must be issued
immediately.
Since an unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD, we determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30
days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
2012–01–03 Eurocopter France:
Amendment No. 39–16914; Docket No.
FAA–2012–0005; Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–091–AD.
(a) Applicability. This AD applies to Model
AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters,
certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition. This AD defines the
unsafe condition as degradation of the
epicyclic reduction gear module within the
main gearbox (MGB). This condition could
result in failure of the MGB and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Other Affected ADs. This AD
supersedes AD 2009–09–51, Amendment 39–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Feb 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
16101, Docket No. FAA–2009–1089,
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–16–AD, (74
FR 65679, Dec. 11, 2009).
(d) Effective Date. This airworthiness
directive (AD) becomes effective February 22,
2012.
(e) Compliance. You are responsible for
performing each action required by this AD
within the specified compliance time unless
it has already been accomplished prior to
that time.
(f) Required Actions. To prevent failure of
the main gearbox (MGB) and loss of control
of the helicopter:
(1) Before further flight:
(i) Determine from the maintenance
records whether, within the last 200 hours
time-in-service (TIS), the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
light illuminated because of a metal particle
on the chip detector of the MGB epicyclic
module (module), and if so, whether the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light stayed illuminated
after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was turned
to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting to activate the
‘‘fuzz burn-off’’ feature.
(A) If the maintenance records indicate that
the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light illuminated
because of a metal particle on the chip
detector of the module, and the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light stayed illuminated after the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was turned to the
‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting, replace the module
with an airworthy module before further
flight.
(B) If the maintenance records do not
indicate which ‘‘CHIP’’ detector caused the
‘‘CHIP’’ detector light to illuminate, or
whether the detector light stayed illuminated
after the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector switch was turned
to the ‘‘CHIP PULSE’’ setting, replace the
module with an airworthy module before
further flight.
(ii) Inspect the module magnetic chip
detector electrical circuit and determine
whether the system is functioning properly,
including whether the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector light
annunciates on the instrument panel (Vehicle
Monitoring System Screen).
(2) After accomplishing paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD, thereafter, if the ‘‘CHIP’’ detector
light illuminates, stays illuminated after the
chip detector switch is turned to the ‘‘CHIP
PULSE’’ setting, and there is a metal particle
on the module magnetic chip detector (rather
than the main reduction gear (lower MGB),
the flared housing (mast assembly), the
intermediate gearbox, or the tail rotor gearbox
chip detectors) that caused the ‘‘CHIP’’
detector light to illuminate, replace the
module with an airworthy module.
(3) Within 50 hours TIS, remove, modify,
reidentify, and reinstall the chip collector as
shown in Figures 2 through 5, and in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.3.b.1) through
2.B.3.b.5) of Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 05.00.81,
Revision 2, dated April 23, 2009, or
Eurocopter EASB No. 05A017, Revision 2,
dated April 23, 2009, for your model
helicopter.
(4) Before installing a MGB, modify,
reidentify, and reinstall the chip collector in
accordance with paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (f) of this AD:
Eurocopter has issued two EASBs with four
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5993
different numbers (Nos. 05.00.81, 05.00.58,
05A017, and 05A016) that apply to 5
different Eurocopter model helicopters.
EASB No. 05.00.58 is for Eurocopter military
Model AS532A2, and U2 helicopters, and
EASB No. 05A016 is for Eurocopter military
Model EC725AP helicopters that are nonFAA type-certificated. EASB No. 05.00.81 is
for FAA type-certificated Eurocopter Model
AS332L2 helicopters and EASB No. 05A017
is for FAA type-certificated Eurocopter
Model EC225LP helicopters. This AD does
not incorporate by reference EASB Nos.
05A016 or 05.00.58.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs).
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137; telephone: (817) 222–4389; fax: (817)
222–5961, email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a Part
119 operating certificate or under Part 91,
Subpart K, we suggest that you notify your
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office or certificate holding
district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information. The subject of
this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2009–0099–E, dated
April 23, 2009.
(i) Subject. JASC Code: 6300: Rotor Drive
System.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference. You
must use the following service information to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference (IBR) of the following service
information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51:
(1) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin No. 05.00.81, Revision 2, dated April
23, 2009, for the model AS332L2; and
(2) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin No. 05A017, Revision 2, dated April
23, 2009, for the model EC225LP helicopters.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, Texas 75052, telephone (972) 641–
0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax (972) 641–3775,
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
(4) You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth Texas 76137 or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_
register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_
locations.html.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5994
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December
28, 2011.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–1118 Filed 2–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0086; Directorate
Identifier 2011–SW–045–AD; Amendment
39–16936; AD 2012–02–13]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Eurocopter France EC130B4 helicopters
that have not had Eurocopter
Modification 073880 incorporated. This
AD is prompted by several reports of
cracks in the tailboom/Fenestron
junction frame, which could result in
structural failure of the tail boom,
resulting in detachment of the Fenestron
(tail rotor) and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter. We are issuing
this AD to correct the unsafe condition
on these helicopters.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
February 22, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of February 22, 2012.
We must receive comments on this
AD by April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Feb 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone (800) 647–5227) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052, telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax
(972) 641–3775, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Grigg, Manager, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Safety Management Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX
76137, telephone (817) 222–5126, email:
jim.grigg@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments prior to it becoming effective.
However, we invite you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that resulted from
adopting this AD. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the AD, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file
in the docket all comments that we
receive, as well as a report summarizing
each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerning this
rulemaking during the comment period.
We will consider all the comments we
receive and may conduct additional
rulemaking based on those comments.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2011–
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
0116, dated July 6, 2011 (AD 2011–
0116) to correct an unsafe condition for
Eurocopter EC 130 B4 helicopters.
EASA advises of several reports of
cracks in the tailboom/Fenestron
junction frame. Prompted by these
reports, Eurocopter published
Information Notice No. 2167–I–53
(2167–I–53). Since publication of 2167–
I–53, new cases of cracks in the
tailboom/Fenestron junction frame have
been reported. Examination of the parts
revealed the cracks were longer than the
previously reported cracks and started
to develop in the plane of the rivet head
countersink on the right hand (RH) side
of the Fenestron and spread to the web
of the frame. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to structural
failure, which could result in Fenestron
detachment and consequent loss of
control of the helicopter. AD 2011–0116
requires repetitive inspections of the
affected area and depending on
findings, accomplishing corrective
actions.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of France and
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, their
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of these
same type designs.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Eurocopter Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin 53A019, dated
June 14, 2011 (EASB). The EASB
describes procedures for inspecting the
RH side of the tailboom/Fenestron
junction frame from the inside and
outside for cracks. If a crack is present,
the EASB requires contacting
Eurocopter for approved repair
instructions.
AD Requirements
This AD requires compliance with
specified portions of the manufacturer’s
service bulletin, except as discussed
under ‘‘Differences Between this AD
and the EASA AD.’’
Differences Between This AD and the
EASA AD
The EASA AD allows for flights for a
certain period of time with known
cracks. Except for limited ferry flights,
this AD does not permit operations with
known cracks. The EASA AD allows for
an initial inspection which does not
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5991-5994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1118]
[[Page 5991]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0005; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-091-AD;
Amendment 39-16914; AD 2012-01-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting an airworthiness directive (AD) for the
Eurocopter France (ECF) Model AS332L2 helicopter and superseding an AD
for the Model EC225LP helicopter. This AD is prompted by the
manufacturer issuing additional corrective action to prevent failure of
the main gearbox (MGB) due to the degradation of the epicyclic module
of the MGB and expands the applicability to include the ECF Model
AS332L2 helicopter because an investigation showed a failure within the
epicyclic reduction gear module resulted in the rupture of the MGB case
and separation of the main rotor head of a model AS332L2 helicopter in
2009. These actions are intended to prevent failure of the MGB and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective February 22, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of February 22,
2012.
We must receive comments on this AD by April 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas
75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-3775,
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222-4389; fax: (817)
222-5961, email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. We will consider
all the comments we receive and may conduct additional rulemaking based
on those comments.
Discussion
We issued Emergency AD (EAD) 2009-09-51 on April 17, 2009, to all
known owners and operators of the Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopter,
and published that EAD as Amendment 39-16101 (74 FR 65679, December 11,
2009) to require determining whether or not the ``CHIP'' detector light
on the instrument panel had previously illuminated. If the ``CHIP''
detector light had illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip
detector of the module, or if you could not determine from the
maintenance records which ``CHIP'' detector caused the ``CHIP''
detector light to illuminate, or if the chip detector light stayed
illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch was turned to the ``CHIP
PULSE'' setting, you are required to replace the module with an
airworthy module before further flight. You are also required, before
further flight, to inspect the MGB module magnetic ``CHIP'' detector
electrical circuit and determine whether the system is functioning
properly, including whether the ``CHIP'' detector light annunciates on
the instrument panel. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
failure of the MGB and loss of control of the helicopter.
Since issuing that AD, we have determined the AD should also apply
to the Model AS332L2 helicopters. We have also determined that we
incorrectly described a part as ``magnetic plug'', and the correct
nomenclature is ``chip detector.'' Finally, we have determined that
modifying the chip collector and inspecting the chip detector should be
required to enhance the early detection capability of the chip
detectors of the gearbox sump and the epicyclic module.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Emergency AD No. 2009-0099-E, dated April 23, 2009 (EAD No. 2009-0099-
E), which supersedes AD No. 2009-0087-E, dated April 11, 2009 and AD
No. 2009-0095-E, dated April 17, 2009, to correct an unsafe condition
for the Eurocopter Model AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters. EASA advises
that early investigations showed that a failure within the epicyclic
reduction gear module of the MGB resulted in the rupture of the MGB
case, which allowed the main rotor head to separate from the
helicopter.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, their technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
[[Page 5992]]
because we evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined
the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
helicopters of these same type designs.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued two Emergency Alert Service Bulletins (EASBs)
with four numbers: No. 05.00.81 for FAA type-certificated Model AS332L2
helicopters; No. 05.00.58 for non-FAA type-certificated military Model
AS532A2 and U2 helicopters; No. 05A016 for non-FAA type-certificated
military Model EC725AP helicopters; and No. 05A017 for FAA type-
certificated Model EC225LP helicopters. Both EASBs are Revision 2, and
are dated April 23, 2009. The EASBs specify checking the chip detector
on the MGB epicyclic module, modifying the main module chip collector,
reidentifying the chip collector, and installing the chip collector
(MOD 0752522). EASA classified these EASBs, or later approved versions,
as mandatory and issued EAD No. 2009-0099-E to ensure continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
AD Requirements
This AD requires:
Determining from the maintenance records whether, within
the last 200 hours time-in-service (TIS), the ``CHIP'' detector light
illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip detector of the
module, and if so, whether the ``CHIP'' detector light stayed
illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch was turned to the ``CHIP
PULSE'' setting to activate the ``fuzz burn-off'' feature.
If the maintenance records indicate that the ``CHIP''
detector light illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip
detector of the module, and the ``CHIP'' detector light stayed
illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch was turned to the ``CHIP
PULSE'' setting, replace the module with an airworthy module before
further flight.
If the maintenance records do not indicate which ``CHIP''
detector caused the ``CHIP'' detector light to illuminate, or whether
the detector light stayed illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector
switch was turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting, replace the module
with an airworthy module before further flight.
Inspecting the MGB module magnetic chip detector
electrical circuit and determining whether the system is functioning
properly, including whether the ``CHIP'' detector light annunciates on
the instrument panel (Vehicle Monitoring System Screen).
Thereafter, if the ``CHIP'' detector light illuminates,
stays illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch is turned to the
``CHIP PULSE'' setting, and there is a metal particle on the epicyclic
module chip detector, (rather than the main reduction gear (lower MGB),
the flared housing (mast assembly), the intermediate gearbox, or the
tail rotor gearbox chip detectors) that caused the ``CHIP'' detector
light to illuminate, replace the module with an airworthy module.
Unless accomplished previously, within 50 hours TIS,
remove, modify, reidentify, and reinstall the chip collector.
Before installing a MGB on any Eurocopter Model AS332L2 or
EC225LP helicopter, modify, reidentify, and reinstall the chip
collector in accordance with paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
The differences between this AD and the EASA AD are:
We use the term ``hours time-in-service'' rather than
``flight hours'' to describe compliance times.
We use the term ``chip detector'' rather than ``magnetic
plug'' to refer to the same part.
If it is determined that within the past 200 hours TIS a
``CHIP'' light was caused by a particle in the module, we require
replacing the module with an airworthy module rather than inspecting it
and returning the same module to service.
We do not mandate a calendar time for complying with this
AD.
The EASA AD specifies, for Eurocopter Model AS332L2
helicopters, checking the chip detector of the module after the last
flight of the day, not to exceed 10 hours TIS, and for the Model
EC225LP helicopters, complying with the maintenance manual each time a
particle is detected. This AD requires treating both models the same,
since both models have the same type of chip detectors and anticipate
compliance with ``normal'' maintenance procedures each time a particle
is detected after accomplishing paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
We do not require returning unairworthy parts or found
particles to the manufacturer.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 4 helicopters of U.S.
registry. We estimate that it will take about 1.0 work hour to inspect
maintenance records to determine if a ``CHIP'' light illuminated within
the past 200 hours TIS; 10 work-hours to remove, inspect, and replace a
module; 14 work-hours to remove, modify, and replace the module to
incorporate the ``CHIP'' collector and flange modifications (MOD
0752522); and 0.2 work-hour, per inspection, to conduct the initial and
repetitive inspection of the chip detector for metal particles. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour, and we estimate it will cost
$85 to inspect the maintenance records; $850 to remove, inspect, and
replace a module; $1,190 to incorporate MOD 0752522; and $408 to
inspect the chip detector (assumes 24 inspections per year per
helicopter), for an estimated total labor cost of $2,533 per
helicopter. Required parts cost is approximately $512,318 to replace a
module. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators is $522,450, assuming all required inspections and
modifications are completed on all helicopters and 1 helicopter
requires a module replacement
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect
both the structural integrity and controllability of the helicopter.
Therefore, because the determination of the ``CHIP'' light
illumination, inspection, and replacement of the module (on condition)
are required before further flight, this AD must be issued immediately.
Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation
[[Page 5993]]
is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2012-01-03 Eurocopter France: Amendment No. 39-16914; Docket No.
FAA-2012-0005; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-091-AD.
(a) Applicability. This AD applies to Model AS332L2 and EC225LP
helicopters, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition. This AD defines the unsafe condition as
degradation of the epicyclic reduction gear module within the main
gearbox (MGB). This condition could result in failure of the MGB and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Other Affected ADs. This AD supersedes AD 2009-09-51,
Amendment 39-16101, Docket No. FAA-2009-1089, Directorate Identifier
2009-SW-16-AD, (74 FR 65679, Dec. 11, 2009).
(d) Effective Date. This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective February 22, 2012.
(e) Compliance. You are responsible for performing each action
required by this AD within the specified compliance time unless it
has already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions. To prevent failure of the main gearbox
(MGB) and loss of control of the helicopter:
(1) Before further flight:
(i) Determine from the maintenance records whether, within the
last 200 hours time-in-service (TIS), the ``CHIP'' detector light
illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip detector of the
MGB epicyclic module (module), and if so, whether the ``CHIP''
detector light stayed illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch
was turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting to activate the ``fuzz
burn-off'' feature.
(A) If the maintenance records indicate that the ``CHIP''
detector light illuminated because of a metal particle on the chip
detector of the module, and the ``CHIP'' detector light stayed
illuminated after the ``CHIP'' detector switch was turned to the
``CHIP PULSE'' setting, replace the module with an airworthy module
before further flight.
(B) If the maintenance records do not indicate which ``CHIP''
detector caused the ``CHIP'' detector light to illuminate, or
whether the detector light stayed illuminated after the ``CHIP''
detector switch was turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting, replace
the module with an airworthy module before further flight.
(ii) Inspect the module magnetic chip detector electrical
circuit and determine whether the system is functioning properly,
including whether the ``CHIP'' detector light annunciates on the
instrument panel (Vehicle Monitoring System Screen).
(2) After accomplishing paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, thereafter,
if the ``CHIP'' detector light illuminates, stays illuminated after
the chip detector switch is turned to the ``CHIP PULSE'' setting,
and there is a metal particle on the module magnetic chip detector
(rather than the main reduction gear (lower MGB), the flared housing
(mast assembly), the intermediate gearbox, or the tail rotor gearbox
chip detectors) that caused the ``CHIP'' detector light to
illuminate, replace the module with an airworthy module.
(3) Within 50 hours TIS, remove, modify, reidentify, and
reinstall the chip collector as shown in Figures 2 through 5, and in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.3.b.1) through 2.B.3.b.5) of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin (EASB) No. 05.00.81, Revision 2, dated April 23, 2009, or
Eurocopter EASB No. 05A017, Revision 2, dated April 23, 2009, for
your model helicopter.
(4) Before installing a MGB, modify, reidentify, and reinstall
the chip collector in accordance with paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
Note 1 to paragraph (f) of this AD: Eurocopter has issued two
EASBs with four different numbers (Nos. 05.00.81, 05.00.58, 05A017,
and 05A016) that apply to 5 different Eurocopter model helicopters.
EASB No. 05.00.58 is for Eurocopter military Model AS532A2, and U2
helicopters, and EASB No. 05A016 is for Eurocopter military Model
EC725AP helicopters that are non-FAA type-certificated. EASB No.
05.00.81 is for FAA type-certificated Eurocopter Model AS332L2
helicopters and EASB No. 05A017 is for FAA type-certificated
Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopters. This AD does not incorporate
by reference EASB Nos. 05A016 or 05.00.58.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs).
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222-
4389; fax: (817) 222-5961, email rao.edupaganti@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a Part 119 operating
certificate or under Part 91, Subpart K, we suggest that you notify
your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the
manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate
holding district office, before operating any aircraft complying
with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information. The subject of this AD is addressed
in European Aviation Safety Agency AD No. 2009-0099-E, dated April
23, 2009.
(i) Subject. JASC Code: 6300: Rotor Drive System.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference. You must use the
following service information to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the
following service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51:
(1) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.00.81,
Revision 2, dated April 23, 2009, for the model AS332L2; and
(2) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017,
Revision 2, dated April 23, 2009, for the model EC225LP helicopters.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie,
Texas 75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax (972)
641-3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
(4) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth Texas 76137 or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
[[Page 5994]]
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 28, 2011.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-1118 Filed 2-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P