Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New York, NY, 5743-5747 [2012-2550]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Tennessee is a Federal program and this
amendment seeks to reinstate
Tennessee’s AML plan therefore we are
publishing a Federal Register notice
indicating receipt of the proposed
amendment, its text or a summary of its
terms, and an opportunity for public
comment. We conclude our review of
the proposed amendment after the close
of the public comment period and
determine whether the amendment
should be approved, approved in part,
or not approved. At that time, we will
also make the determinations and
certifications required by the various
laws and executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 942
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: December 6, 2011.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–2651 Filed 2–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 110
[USCG–2011–0563]
RIN 1625–AA01
Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New
York, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
(1) establish two special anchorage areas
along the Hudson River adjacent to
Manhattan at the 79th Street Boat Basin;
(2) establish two special anchorage areas
on Sandy Hook Bay at Atlantic
Highlands, NJ; (3) disestablish the
western special anchorage area in
Sheepshead Bay, NY; and (4)
disestablish the Captain of the Port New
York Commercial Mooring Buoy permit
regulations and table displaying the
mooring anchor, chain, and pendant
requirements. This proposed action is
necessary to facilitate safe navigation in
these areas and provide safe and secure
anchorages for vessels not more than 65
feet in length. This action is intended to
increase the safety of life and property
in New York City and Atlantic
Highlands, NJ, improve the safety of
anchored vessels, and provide for the
overall safe and efficient flow of vessel
traffic and commerce.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:45 Feb 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector New York; telephone (718)
354–4195, email Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.
mil or Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac
Slavitt, Waterways Management
Division at Coast Guard First District,
telephone (617) 223–8385, email
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coast Guard
ACTION:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 6, 2012. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before February 27,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0563 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.
regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0563),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5743
material online (via https://www.
regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. If you submit a comment
online via https://www.regulations.gov, it
will be considered received by the Coast
Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand deliver,
or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0563’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0563’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
5744
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But, you may submit a request
for a public meeting using one of the
four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that a public
meeting would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236,
2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define anchorage grounds.
The proposed rule is intended to
reduce the risk of vessel collisions by
establishing two special anchorage areas
in the Hudson River near the 79th Street
Boat Basin, Manhattan, NY; establishing
two special anchorage areas in Sandy
Hook Bay at Atlantic Highlands, NJ;
requiring all vessels and anchors to
remain entirely within the northern and
southern special anchorage areas in
Sheepshead Bay, NY; and reducing the
illegal mooring of vessels and dinghies
to New York City property by
disestablishing the western special
anchorage area at Sheepshead Bay, NY.
The proposed rule is also intended to
reduce the confusion among
professional and recreational mariners
by disestablishing the Captain of the
Port New York Commercial Mooring
Buoy permit regulations and Table
§ 110.155(l)(7) displaying the mooring
anchor, chain, and pendant
requirements. These regulations are in
conflict with current U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Federal regulations as well
as New Jersey and New York local and
State laws and regulations.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
two new special anchorage areas on the
Hudson River at the request of New
York City Parks and Recreation
Department (NYC PARKS).
NYC PARKS requested these
particular areas be designated as special
anchorage areas as they have been
historically used as mooring fields by
recreational vessels, are no longer
within the boundaries of Anchorage
Ground 19 East or 19 West decreasing
the knowledge of their presence to other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:45 Feb 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
mariners transiting the area, and are
within waters under the jurisdiction of
New York City.
The proposed rule would establish a
special anchorage area to the north and
south of the 79th Street Boat Basin along
the Manhattan shoreline of the Hudson
River, maintaining anchorage for
approximately 126 vessels in two
currently designated mooring fields.
The first of these areas is approximately
530 yards by 170 yards, encompasses
18.40 square acres, and is about 160
yards south of the 79th Street Boat
Basin. The second of these areas is
approximately 2,630 yards by 160 yards,
encompasses 89.90 square acres, and is
north and adjacent to the 79th Street
Boat Basin.
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
two new special anchorage areas on
Sandy Hook Bay within the boundary of
the Atlantic Highlands Municipal
Harbor. The Borough of Atlantic
Highlands requested these particular
areas be designated as special anchorage
areas because they have been
historically used as mooring fields by
recreational vessels, are within waters
under the jurisdiction of the Borough of
Atlantic Highlands, and would allow
tenants to leave their anchor lights off
during hours of darkness. The majority
of their tenants do not stay on their
vessels at night. Leaving their lights on
overnight could result in dead batteries
and inoperable bilge pumps, which
could in turn result in vessels taking on
water and sinking, disrupting other
tenants in the area.
The proposed rule would establish
two special anchorage areas inside the
charted breakwater at Atlantic
Highlands, NJ, on Sandy Hook Bay,
maintaining anchorage for
approximately 195 vessels in two
currently designated mooring fields.
The first area is approximately 1,060
yards by 250 yards, encompasses about
51.7 square acres, and is about 100
yards north of the Atlantic Highlands
Municipal Harbor. The second area is
approximately 465 yards by 215 yards,
encompasses about 19.7 square acres,
and is east of and adjacent to the
Atlantic Highlands Municipal Harbor.
The proposed rule would establish a
new requirement that all vessels and
anchors remain within the northern and
southern special anchorage areas in
Sheepshead Bay, NY at all times. During
times of high winds, vessels moored
near the edge of these special anchorage
areas were observed swinging out into
Sheepshead Bay, interfering with the
transit of chartered fishing boats to and
from their NYC-managed piers to the
west. Since moored vessels in a special
anchorage area are exempt from the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Inland Rules of the Road [Rule 30 and
Rule 35 (33 CFR 83)], vessels swinging
outside the special anchorage area
boundaries create a high risk of collision
with larger charter fishing vessels and
event vessels that transit past these
special anchorage areas, especially at
night and during times of inclement
weather. Also, when larger charter
fishing vessels and event vessels
maneuver to avoid colliding with
recreation vessels that swing outside the
special anchorage area, it creates a
hazardous, close-quarters situation with
two categories of vessels:
(1) Other larger charter fishing vessels
and event vessels operating between
these two special anchorage areas, and
(2) Recreational vessels swinging
outside of the opposite special
anchorage area.
The Coast Guard also proposes to
disestablish the western special
anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay, NY
at the request of NYC Parks. NYC Parks
reports that vessels are using this
special anchorage area to circumvent
the guest mooring options maintained
by the Sheepshead Bay boating clubs
under the authority of NYC Parks. NYC
Parks reports that these vessel owners
secure their dinghies to the surrounding
sea walls, commercial piers, or
pedestrian foot bridge while the owners
go ashore. This is prohibited by New
York City laws and regulations and the
dinghies have been confiscated by NYC
Parks. This area is approximately 375
yards by 80 yards that encompasses
about 6.27 square acres and is near the
western end of Sheepshead Bay.
This rule would disestablish the
Captain of the Port New York
Commercial Mooring Buoy permit
regulations at 33 CFR 110.155(l)(8),
along with Table § 110.155(l)(7)
displaying the mooring anchor, chain,
and pendant requirements. The
commercial mooring buoy permits are
now issued by the United States Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) under the
authority of 33 CFR 322 and 33 CFR
330. The co-location of many
commercial Anchorage Grounds and
recreational special anchorage areas in
many locations has caused confusion
with many mariners regarding the
issuance of these permits. As special
anchorage areas are located along the
shoreline they fall within the
jurisdiction of the States of New Jersey
and New York. Both New Jersey and
New York have State Coastal Zone
Management or State Navigation
regulations with jurisdiction over the
placement and permitting of
recreational mooring buoys. Removing
these mooring buoy permit regulations
would reduce confusion among
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
professional and recreational mariners,
and remove Federal regulations that
conflict with USACE regulations as well
as New Jersey and New York State laws
and regulations.
In developing this proposed rule, the
Coast Guard has consulted with the
Army Corps of Engineers, New York
District, located at 26 Federal Plaza,
New York, NY 10278. For permitting
information, mariners should contact
the NYC Parks Brooklyn Permit Office at
(718) 965–8975. For guest moorings and
access to/from the eastern special
anchorage areas mariners may contact
the following boating clubs: Miramar
Yacht Club (718) 769–3548; Port
Sheepshead (917) 731–8607; or
Sheepshead Yacht Club (718) 891–0991.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect minimal additional cost
impacts on fishing, or recreational boats
anchoring because this rule would not
affect normal surface navigation.
Although this regulation may have some
impact on the public, the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: Normal surface
navigation will not be affected as the
special anchorage areas on the Hudson
River and Sandy Hook Bay have
historically been used as mooring fields
by NYC Parks and the town of Atlantic
Highlands, NJ.
The regulation requiring all vessels
anchoring in Sheepshead Bay, NY to
remain entirely within the northern and
southern special anchorage areas at all
times has the potential to reduce the
number of vessels that are able to
anchor within the special anchorage
areas. However, this is necessary to
maintain an open area for larger charter
fishing vessels and event vessels
transiting to and from NYC Parks
maintained fishing piers to the west.
Disestablishing the western special
anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay, NY
would reduce the area available for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:45 Feb 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
5745
mooring recreational vessels; however,
NYC Parks requested this action in
order to reduce the illegal mooring of
vessels and dinghies to NYC property
while the vessel owners/operators are
ashore. These vessels would still be able
to anchor on transient vessel moorings
in the northern and southern special
anchorage areas in Sheepshead Bay, NY.
We expect minimal additional cost
impacts on the tug and barge operators
because this rule would disestablish
USCG permitting regulations that are
currently under the jurisdiction of the
District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1
(888) REG–FAIR
(1–(888) 734–3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or
operators of recreational and small
fishing vessels intending to anchor in
the Hudson River, Sandy Hook Bay, NJ,
and Sheepshead Bay, NY. The proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the same
reasons outlined above in the
‘‘Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563’’ section.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Collection of Information
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
5746
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. We believe the
proposed rule would be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(f) of the Instruction because it
involves the establishment, and
disestablishment, of special anchorage
areas and anchorage ground regulations.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 110.60 to read as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
§ 110.60
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:45 Feb 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
Captain of the Port, New York.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(12) 79th Street Boat Basin South. All
waters of the Hudson River enclosed by
a line beginning at the northwest corner
of the 70th Street pier at approximate
position 40°46′47.10″ N, 073°59′29.13″
W; thence to 40°47′02.60″ N,
073°59′17.88″ W; thence to 40°46′59.73″
N, 073°59′13.01″ W; thence along the
shoreline and pier to the point of
beginning.
(13) 79th Street Boat Basin North. All
waters of the Hudson River enclosed by
a line beginning on the shoreline near
West 110th Street at approximate
position 40°48′21.06″ N, 073°58′15.72″
W; thence to 40°48′21.06″ N,
073°58′24.00″ W; thence to 40°47′14.70″
N, 073°59′09.00″ W; thence to
40°47′11.84″ N, 073°59′08.90″ W; thence
along the breakwater and shoreline to
the point of beginning.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use
of the moorings in anchorage areas
described in paragraphs (c)(12) and
(c)(13) of this section will be under the
supervision, and at the discretion, of the
local Harbor Master appointed by the
City of New York. Mariners may contact
the boat basin on VHF CH 9 or at (212)
496–2105 for mooring and anchoring
availability. All moorings or anchors
shall be placed well within the
anchorage areas so that no portion of the
hull or rigging will at any time extend
outside of the anchorage.
(ii) [Reserved.]
(d) * * *
(6) [Reserved.]
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use
of the moorings in anchorage areas
described in paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8)
of this section will be under the
supervision, and at the discretion, of the
local Harbor Master appointed by the
City of New York. All moorings or
anchors shall be placed well within the
anchorage areas so that no portion of the
hull or rigging will at any time extend
outside of the anchorage. For permitting
information mariners should contact the
NYC Parks Brooklyn Permit Office at
(718) 965–8975. For guest moorings and
access to and from the anchorage areas
described in paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8)
mariners may contact the following
boating clubs: Miramar Yacht Club (718)
769–3548; Port Sheepshead (917) 731–
8607; or Sheepshead Yacht Club (718)
891–0991.
(ii) [Reserved].
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Atlantic Highlands North. All of
the waters of Sandy Hook Bay enclosed
by a line beginning on the breakwater at
approximate position 40°25′08.56″ N,
074°01′19.66″ W; thence to 40°25′01.59″
N, 074°01′22.70″ W; thence to
40°25′06.97″ N, 074°01′59.80″ W; thence
to 40°25′11.93″ N, 074°02′01.54″ W
thence along the breakwater to the point
of origin.
(12) Atlantic Highlands South. All of
the waters of Sandy Hook Bay enclosed
by a line beginning on the shoreline at
approximate position 40°24′53.97″ N,
074°01′32.49″ W; thence to 40°24′59.86″
N, 074°01′31.07″ W; thence to
40°25′02.20″ N, 074°01′48.60″ W; thence
to 40°24′57.42″ N, 074°01′50.53″ W;
thence along the shoreline to the point
of origin.
(i) Mariners using the anchorage areas
described in paragraphs (d)(11) and
(d)(12) must contact the local
harbormaster, to ensure compliance
with any additional applicable state and
local laws.
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(ii) [Reserved]
(e) Datum. All positions are NAD
1983.
3. Revise § 110.155 to read as follows:
§ 110.155
Port of New York.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(8) Operations near commercial
mooring buoys permitted by the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
(i) No vessel shall continuously
occupy a mooring when a vessel in
regular traffic requires the berth or when
navigation would be menaced or
inconvenienced thereby.
(ii) No vessel shall moor or anchor in
any anchorage in such a manner as to
interfere with the use of a duly
authorized mooring buoy. Nor shall any
vessel moored to a buoy authorized by
the District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers be moored such that any
portion of that vessel comes within 50
feet of a marked or dredged channel.
(iii) No vessel shall be operated
within the limits of an anchorage at
speed exceeding 6 knots when in the
vicinity of a moored vessel.
(iv) In an emergency the Captain of
the Port may shift the position of any
unattended vessel moored in or near
any anchorage.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 23, 2012.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–2550 Filed 2–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1126]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones, Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
Week Moving Vessels, Puget Sound,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Coast Guard is
proposing to establish security zones
around designated participating vessels
that are not protected by the Naval
Vessel Protection Zone in Seattle’s
Seafair Fleet Week, while those vessels
are in the Sector Puget Sound Captain
of the Port (COTP) Zone. A designated
participating vessel is a vessel that is
named by the Coast Guard each year
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:45 Feb 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ensign Anthony P.
LaBoy, Sector Puget Sound, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone (206) 217–6323, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coast Guard
ACTION:
prior to the event in a Federal Register
notice, as well as the Local Notice to
Mariners. These security zones are
necessary to help ensure the security of
the vessels from sabotage or other
subversive acts during Seattle’s Seafair
Fleet Week Parade of Ships and while
moored in the Port of Seattle. The Coast
Guard will ensure the security of these
vessels by prohibiting any person or
vessel from entering or remaining in the
security zones unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–1126 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5747
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–1126),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1126’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
1126’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5743-5747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2550]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[USCG-2011-0563]
RIN 1625-AA01
Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New York, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to (1) establish two special
anchorage areas along the Hudson River adjacent to Manhattan at the
79th Street Boat Basin; (2) establish two special anchorage areas on
Sandy Hook Bay at Atlantic Highlands, NJ; (3) disestablish the western
special anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay, NY; and (4) disestablish the
Captain of the Port New York Commercial Mooring Buoy permit regulations
and table displaying the mooring anchor, chain, and pendant
requirements. This proposed action is necessary to facilitate safe
navigation in these areas and provide safe and secure anchorages for
vessels not more than 65 feet in length. This action is intended to
increase the safety of life and property in New York City and Atlantic
Highlands, NJ, improve the safety of anchored vessels, and provide for
the overall safe and efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 6, 2012. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before February 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0563 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Waterways Management Division,
Coast Guard Sector New York; telephone (718) 354-4195, email
Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil or Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt,
Waterways Management Division at Coast Guard First District, telephone
(617) 223-8385, email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0563), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0563'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0563'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor
[[Page 5744]]
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice regarding our public
dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR
3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But, you may submit a
request for a public meeting using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would
be beneficial. If we determine that a public meeting would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221
through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize
the Coast Guard to define anchorage grounds.
The proposed rule is intended to reduce the risk of vessel
collisions by establishing two special anchorage areas in the Hudson
River near the 79th Street Boat Basin, Manhattan, NY; establishing two
special anchorage areas in Sandy Hook Bay at Atlantic Highlands, NJ;
requiring all vessels and anchors to remain entirely within the
northern and southern special anchorage areas in Sheepshead Bay, NY;
and reducing the illegal mooring of vessels and dinghies to New York
City property by disestablishing the western special anchorage area at
Sheepshead Bay, NY. The proposed rule is also intended to reduce the
confusion among professional and recreational mariners by
disestablishing the Captain of the Port New York Commercial Mooring
Buoy permit regulations and Table Sec. 110.155(l)(7) displaying the
mooring anchor, chain, and pendant requirements. These regulations are
in conflict with current U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal
regulations as well as New Jersey and New York local and State laws and
regulations.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish two new special anchorage
areas on the Hudson River at the request of New York City Parks and
Recreation Department (NYC PARKS).
NYC PARKS requested these particular areas be designated as special
anchorage areas as they have been historically used as mooring fields
by recreational vessels, are no longer within the boundaries of
Anchorage Ground 19 East or 19 West decreasing the knowledge of their
presence to other mariners transiting the area, and are within waters
under the jurisdiction of New York City.
The proposed rule would establish a special anchorage area to the
north and south of the 79th Street Boat Basin along the Manhattan
shoreline of the Hudson River, maintaining anchorage for approximately
126 vessels in two currently designated mooring fields. The first of
these areas is approximately 530 yards by 170 yards, encompasses 18.40
square acres, and is about 160 yards south of the 79th Street Boat
Basin. The second of these areas is approximately 2,630 yards by 160
yards, encompasses 89.90 square acres, and is north and adjacent to the
79th Street Boat Basin.
The Coast Guard proposes to establish two new special anchorage
areas on Sandy Hook Bay within the boundary of the Atlantic Highlands
Municipal Harbor. The Borough of Atlantic Highlands requested these
particular areas be designated as special anchorage areas because they
have been historically used as mooring fields by recreational vessels,
are within waters under the jurisdiction of the Borough of Atlantic
Highlands, and would allow tenants to leave their anchor lights off
during hours of darkness. The majority of their tenants do not stay on
their vessels at night. Leaving their lights on overnight could result
in dead batteries and inoperable bilge pumps, which could in turn
result in vessels taking on water and sinking, disrupting other tenants
in the area.
The proposed rule would establish two special anchorage areas
inside the charted breakwater at Atlantic Highlands, NJ, on Sandy Hook
Bay, maintaining anchorage for approximately 195 vessels in two
currently designated mooring fields. The first area is approximately
1,060 yards by 250 yards, encompasses about 51.7 square acres, and is
about 100 yards north of the Atlantic Highlands Municipal Harbor. The
second area is approximately 465 yards by 215 yards, encompasses about
19.7 square acres, and is east of and adjacent to the Atlantic
Highlands Municipal Harbor.
The proposed rule would establish a new requirement that all
vessels and anchors remain within the northern and southern special
anchorage areas in Sheepshead Bay, NY at all times. During times of
high winds, vessels moored near the edge of these special anchorage
areas were observed swinging out into Sheepshead Bay, interfering with
the transit of chartered fishing boats to and from their NYC-managed
piers to the west. Since moored vessels in a special anchorage area are
exempt from the Inland Rules of the Road [Rule 30 and Rule 35 (33 CFR
83)], vessels swinging outside the special anchorage area boundaries
create a high risk of collision with larger charter fishing vessels and
event vessels that transit past these special anchorage areas,
especially at night and during times of inclement weather. Also, when
larger charter fishing vessels and event vessels maneuver to avoid
colliding with recreation vessels that swing outside the special
anchorage area, it creates a hazardous, close-quarters situation with
two categories of vessels:
(1) Other larger charter fishing vessels and event vessels
operating between these two special anchorage areas, and
(2) Recreational vessels swinging outside of the opposite special
anchorage area.
The Coast Guard also proposes to disestablish the western special
anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay, NY at the request of NYC Parks. NYC
Parks reports that vessels are using this special anchorage area to
circumvent the guest mooring options maintained by the Sheepshead Bay
boating clubs under the authority of NYC Parks. NYC Parks reports that
these vessel owners secure their dinghies to the surrounding sea walls,
commercial piers, or pedestrian foot bridge while the owners go ashore.
This is prohibited by New York City laws and regulations and the
dinghies have been confiscated by NYC Parks. This area is approximately
375 yards by 80 yards that encompasses about 6.27 square acres and is
near the western end of Sheepshead Bay.
This rule would disestablish the Captain of the Port New York
Commercial Mooring Buoy permit regulations at 33 CFR 110.155(l)(8),
along with Table Sec. 110.155(l)(7) displaying the mooring anchor,
chain, and pendant requirements. The commercial mooring buoy permits
are now issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
under the authority of 33 CFR 322 and 33 CFR 330. The co-location of
many commercial Anchorage Grounds and recreational special anchorage
areas in many locations has caused confusion with many mariners
regarding the issuance of these permits. As special anchorage areas are
located along the shoreline they fall within the jurisdiction of the
States of New Jersey and New York. Both New Jersey and New York have
State Coastal Zone Management or State Navigation regulations with
jurisdiction over the placement and permitting of recreational mooring
buoys. Removing these mooring buoy permit regulations would reduce
confusion among
[[Page 5745]]
professional and recreational mariners, and remove Federal regulations
that conflict with USACE regulations as well as New Jersey and New York
State laws and regulations.
In developing this proposed rule, the Coast Guard has consulted
with the Army Corps of Engineers, New York District, located at 26
Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278. For permitting information, mariners
should contact the NYC Parks Brooklyn Permit Office at (718) 965-8975.
For guest moorings and access to/from the eastern special anchorage
areas mariners may contact the following boating clubs: Miramar Yacht
Club (718) 769-3548; Port Sheepshead (917) 731-8607; or Sheepshead
Yacht Club (718) 891-0991.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
We expect minimal additional cost impacts on fishing, or
recreational boats anchoring because this rule would not affect normal
surface navigation. Although this regulation may have some impact on
the public, the potential impact will be minimized for the following
reasons: Normal surface navigation will not be affected as the special
anchorage areas on the Hudson River and Sandy Hook Bay have
historically been used as mooring fields by NYC Parks and the town of
Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
The regulation requiring all vessels anchoring in Sheepshead Bay,
NY to remain entirely within the northern and southern special
anchorage areas at all times has the potential to reduce the number of
vessels that are able to anchor within the special anchorage areas.
However, this is necessary to maintain an open area for larger charter
fishing vessels and event vessels transiting to and from NYC Parks
maintained fishing piers to the west.
Disestablishing the western special anchorage area in Sheepshead
Bay, NY would reduce the area available for mooring recreational
vessels; however, NYC Parks requested this action in order to reduce
the illegal mooring of vessels and dinghies to NYC property while the
vessel owners/operators are ashore. These vessels would still be able
to anchor on transient vessel moorings in the northern and southern
special anchorage areas in Sheepshead Bay, NY.
We expect minimal additional cost impacts on the tug and barge
operators because this rule would disestablish USCG permitting
regulations that are currently under the jurisdiction of the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or
operators of recreational and small fishing vessels intending to anchor
in the Hudson River, Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, and Sheepshead Bay, NY. The
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the same reasons outlined
above in the ``Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563''
section.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1 (888) REG-FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
[[Page 5746]]
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. We believe the proposed
rule would be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(f) of the Instruction because it involves the establishment, and
disestablishment, of special anchorage areas and anchorage ground
regulations. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist is available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071;
33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
2. Revise Sec. 110.60 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.60 Captain of the Port, New York.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(12) 79th Street Boat Basin South. All waters of the Hudson River
enclosed by a line beginning at the northwest corner of the 70th Street
pier at approximate position 40[deg]46'47.10'' N, 073[deg]59'29.13'' W;
thence to 40[deg]47'02.60'' N, 073[deg]59'17.88'' W; thence to
40[deg]46'59.73'' N, 073[deg]59'13.01'' W; thence along the shoreline
and pier to the point of beginning.
(13) 79th Street Boat Basin North. All waters of the Hudson River
enclosed by a line beginning on the shoreline near West 110th Street at
approximate position 40[deg]48'21.06'' N, 073[deg]58'15.72'' W; thence
to 40[deg]48'21.06'' N, 073[deg]58'24.00'' W; thence to
40[deg]47'14.70'' N, 073[deg]59'09.00'' W; thence to 40[deg]47'11.84''
N, 073[deg]59'08.90'' W; thence along the breakwater and shoreline to
the point of beginning.
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use of the moorings in anchorage
areas described in paragraphs (c)(12) and (c)(13) of this section will
be under the supervision, and at the discretion, of the local Harbor
Master appointed by the City of New York. Mariners may contact the boat
basin on VHF CH 9 or at (212) 496-2105 for mooring and anchoring
availability. All moorings or anchors shall be placed well within the
anchorage areas so that no portion of the hull or rigging will at any
time extend outside of the anchorage.
(ii) [Reserved.]
(d) * * *
(6) [Reserved.]
* * * * *
(8) * * *
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use of the moorings in anchorage
areas described in paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8) of this section will be
under the supervision, and at the discretion, of the local Harbor
Master appointed by the City of New York. All moorings or anchors shall
be placed well within the anchorage areas so that no portion of the
hull or rigging will at any time extend outside of the anchorage. For
permitting information mariners should contact the NYC Parks Brooklyn
Permit Office at (718) 965-8975. For guest moorings and access to and
from the anchorage areas described in paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8)
mariners may contact the following boating clubs: Miramar Yacht Club
(718) 769-3548; Port Sheepshead (917) 731-8607; or Sheepshead Yacht
Club (718) 891-0991.
(ii) [Reserved].
* * * * *
(11) Atlantic Highlands North. All of the waters of Sandy Hook Bay
enclosed by a line beginning on the breakwater at approximate position
40[deg]25'08.56'' N, 074[deg]01'19.66'' W; thence to 40[deg]25'01.59''
N, 074[deg]01'22.70'' W; thence to 40[deg]25'06.97'' N,
074[deg]01'59.80'' W; thence to 40[deg]25'11.93'' N, 074[deg]02'01.54''
W thence along the breakwater to the point of origin.
(12) Atlantic Highlands South. All of the waters of Sandy Hook Bay
enclosed by a line beginning on the shoreline at approximate position
40[deg]24'53.97'' N, 074[deg]01'32.49'' W; thence to 40[deg]24'59.86''
N, 074[deg]01'31.07'' W; thence to 40[deg]25'02.20'' N,
074[deg]01'48.60'' W; thence to 40[deg]24'57.42'' N, 074[deg]01'50.53''
W; thence along the shoreline to the point of origin.
(i) Mariners using the anchorage areas described in paragraphs
(d)(11) and (d)(12) must contact the local harbormaster, to ensure
compliance with any additional applicable state and local laws.
[[Page 5747]]
(ii) [Reserved]
(e) Datum. All positions are NAD 1983.
3. Revise Sec. 110.155 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.155 Port of New York.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(8) Operations near commercial mooring buoys permitted by the
District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
(i) No vessel shall continuously occupy a mooring when a vessel in
regular traffic requires the berth or when navigation would be menaced
or inconvenienced thereby.
(ii) No vessel shall moor or anchor in any anchorage in such a
manner as to interfere with the use of a duly authorized mooring buoy.
Nor shall any vessel moored to a buoy authorized by the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers be moored such that any portion
of that vessel comes within 50 feet of a marked or dredged channel.
(iii) No vessel shall be operated within the limits of an anchorage
at speed exceeding 6 knots when in the vicinity of a moored vessel.
(iv) In an emergency the Captain of the Port may shift the position
of any unattended vessel moored in or near any anchorage.
* * * * *
Dated: January 23, 2012.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012-2550 Filed 2-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P