Safety Zone; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Vicinity of Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC, 5398-5400 [2012-2390]
Download as PDF
5398
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1602
Administrative practice and
procedure, Equal Employment
Opportunity.
Dated: January 30, 2012.
For the Commission.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
Accordingly, part 1602 is amended as
follows:
PART 1602—RECORDKEEPING AND
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER
TITLE VII, THE ADA, AND GINA
1. The authority citation for part 1602
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000e–8, 2000e–12;
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 12117; 42
U.S.C. 2000ff–6.
§§ 1602.14, 1602.21, 1602.28, 1602.31
[Amended]
2. Amend part 1602 by removing the
words ‘‘title VII or the ADA’’ and adding
in their place the words ‘‘title VII, the
ADA, or GINA’’ in the following places:
a. § 1602.14.
b. § 1602.21(b).
c. § 1602.28(a).
d. § 1602.31.
■
[FR Doc. 2012–2420 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0022]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Upper Mississippi River, Rock Island,
IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Rock
Island Railroad and Highway
Drawbridge across the Upper
Mississippi River, mile 482.9, at Rock
Island, Illinois. The deviation is
necessary to allow the Quad City
Marathon to cross the bridge. This
deviation allows the bridge to be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation
position for four hours.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on September 23,
2012.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2012–
0022 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0022 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Eric A. Washburn, Bridge
Administrator, Western Rivers, Coast
Guard; telephone (314) 269–2378, email
Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Army Rock Island Arsenal requested a
temporary deviation for the Rock Island
Railroad and Highway Drawbridge,
across the Upper Mississippi River, mile
482.9, at Rock Island, Illinois to remain
in the closed-to-navigation position for
a four-hour period from 7:30 a.m. to
11:30 a.m., September 23, 2012, while a
marathon is held between the cities of
Davenport, IA and Rock Island, IL. The
Rock Island Railroad and Highway
Drawbridge currently operates in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.5, which
states the general requirement that
drawbridges shall open promptly and
fully for the passage of vessels when a
request to open is given in accordance
with the subpart.
There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting this section of the
Upper Mississippi River.
The Rock Island Railroad and
Highway Drawbridge, in the closed-tonavigation position, provides a vertical
clearance of 23.8 feet above normal
pool. Navigation on the waterway
consists primarily of commercial tows
and recreational watercraft. This
temporary deviation has been
coordinated with waterway users. No
objections were received.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: January 12, 2012.
Eric A. Washburn,
Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers.
[FR Doc. 2012–2387 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1166]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, Vicinity of Marine Corps
Base, Camp Lejeune, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AICW)
adjacent to Marine Corps Base (MCB)
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, which
encompasses the navigable waters of the
AICW between Mile Hammock Bay and
the Onslow Swing Bridge in support of
military training operations. This action
is necessary to provide for safety of life
on navigable waters during the military
training operation. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic on the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to
protect mariners from the hazards
associated with military training
operations.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
on February 6, 2012 through 4 p.m. on
February 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2011–1166 and are
available online by going to https://www.
regulations.gov, inserting USCG–2011–
1166 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and then
clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is also
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Chief Warrant Officer
Joseph Edge, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector North Carolina,
Coast Guard; telephone (252) 247–4525,
email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03FER1.SGM
03FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Information
On January 10, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, Vicinity of
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC
in the Federal Register (77 FR 1431).
We received no comments on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the participants,
patrol vessels, and other vessels
transiting the event area. However, the
Coast Guard will provide advance
notifications to users of the effected
waterways via marine information
broadcasts, local notice to mariners,
commercial radio stations and area
newspapers.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background and Purpose
On February 6 and 7, 2012 the Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina will be conducting military
training operations on the navigable
waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway between position 34°32′51″
N, 077°19′36″ W and 34°34′15″ N,
077°16′16″ W (NAD 1983). Due to the
need to protect mariners from the
hazards associated with the military
training operations, vessel traffic will be
temporary restricted between Mile
Hammock Bay and the Onslow Swing
Bridge.
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on specified waters of the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between
position 34°32′51″ N, 077°19′36″ W and
34°34′15″ N, 077°16′16″ W (NAD 1983).
This safety zone will be established in
the vicinity of Camp Lejeune, NC from
7 a.m. until 11 a.m., and from 12:01
p.m. until 4 p.m. on February 6, 2012,
from 7 a.m. until 11 a.m., and from
12:01 p.m. until 4 p.m. on February 7,
2012. In the interest of public safety,
general navigation within the safety
zone will be restricted during the
specified date and times. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or
his representative, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area.
the Coast Guard is establishing safety
zones on the specified navigable waters
of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
Although this regulation restricts access
to the safety zone, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: (i) The
safety zone will be in effect for a limited
duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size;
and (iii) the Coast Guard will make
notifications via maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because the zone will only be in place
for a limited duration, it is limited in
size, and maritime advisories will be
issued allowing the mariners to adjust
their plans accordingly.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
that portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. on
February 6 and 7, 2012.
The Coast Guard did not receive
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published
in the Federal Register. Accordingly,
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5399
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–(888) REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
E:\FR\FM\03FER1.SGM
03FER1
5400
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Environment
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishment of a temporary
safety zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Carolina or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Sector
North Carolina can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector North
Carolina in Wilmington, North Carolina
at telephone Number 910–343–3880.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced from 7 a.m.
until 11 a.m., and from 12:01 p.m. until
4 p.m. on February 6, 2012; from 7 a.m.
until 11 a.m., and from 12:01 p.m. until
4 p.m. on February 7, 2012.
Dated: January 20, 2012.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012–2390 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am]
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
■
2. Add § 165.T05–1166 to read as
follows:
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0731; FRL–9625–8]
§ 165.T05–1166 Safety Zone; Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, Vicinity of Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC.
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Amendments to Virginia’s Regulation
Regarding the Sulfur Dioxide National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector North
Carolina zone, as defined in 33 CFR
3.25–20, in the vicinity of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway between position
34°32′51″ N/077°19′36″ W and
34°34′15″ N/077°16′16″ W (NAD 1983).
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Sector North Carolina, North
Carolina to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector North
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Virginia (Virginia). This revision
pertains to amendments of Virginia’s
regulations regarding the 2010 1-hour
primary national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide
(SO2). This action is being taken under
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on March 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03FER1.SGM
03FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 23 (Friday, February 3, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5398-5400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2390]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1166]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Vicinity of Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AICW) adjacent to Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina, which encompasses the navigable waters of the
AICW between Mile Hammock Bay and the Onslow Swing Bridge in support of
military training operations. This action is necessary to provide for
safety of life on navigable waters during the military training
operation. This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic on the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to protect mariners from the hazards
associated with military training operations.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on February 6, 2012 through 4
p.m. on February 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2011-1166 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1166 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Chief Warrant Officer Joseph Edge,
Waterways Management Division Chief, Sector North Carolina, Coast
Guard; telephone (252) 247-4525, email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 5399]]
Regulatory Information
On January 10, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Vicinity
of Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC in the Federal Register (77 FR
1431). We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the participants, patrol vessels, and other
vessels transiting the event area. However, the Coast Guard will
provide advance notifications to users of the effected waterways via
marine information broadcasts, local notice to mariners, commercial
radio stations and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On February 6 and 7, 2012 the Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina will be conducting military training operations on the
navigable waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between position
34[deg]32'51'' N, 077[deg]19'36'' W and 34[deg]34'15'' N,
077[deg]16'16'' W (NAD 1983). Due to the need to protect mariners from
the hazards associated with the military training operations, vessel
traffic will be temporary restricted between Mile Hammock Bay and the
Onslow Swing Bridge.
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on specified waters
of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between position 34[deg]32'51''
N, 077[deg]19'36'' W and 34[deg]34'15'' N, 077[deg]16'16'' W (NAD
1983). This safety zone will be established in the vicinity of Camp
Lejeune, NC from 7 a.m. until 11 a.m., and from 12:01 p.m. until 4 p.m.
on February 6, 2012, from 7 a.m. until 11 a.m., and from 12:01 p.m.
until 4 p.m. on February 7, 2012. In the interest of public safety,
general navigation within the safety zone will be restricted during the
specified date and times. Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
representative, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did not receive comments in response to the notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard is establishing safety zones on the
specified navigable waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this regulation
restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not
be significant because: (i) The safety zone will be in effect for a
limited duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii) the Coast
Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the zone will only be in place for a limited duration,
it is limited in size, and maritime advisories will be issued allowing
the mariners to adjust their plans accordingly.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in that portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. on February 6 and 7, 2012.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-(888) REG-
FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
[[Page 5400]]
minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-1166 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-1166 Safety Zone; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Vicinity of Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: specified
waters of the Captain of the Port Sector North Carolina zone, as
defined in 33 CFR 3.25-20, in the vicinity of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway between position 34[deg]32'51'' N/077[deg]19'36'' W and
34[deg]34'15'' N/077[deg]16'16'' W (NAD 1983).
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sector North Carolina, North Carolina to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector North Carolina or his
designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Sector North Carolina can be reached
through the Sector Duty Officer at Sector North Carolina in Wilmington,
North Carolina at telephone Number 910-343-3880.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This regulation will be enforced from 7
a.m. until 11 a.m., and from 12:01 p.m. until 4 p.m. on February 6,
2012; from 7 a.m. until 11 a.m., and from 12:01 p.m. until 4 p.m. on
February 7, 2012.
Dated: January 20, 2012.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012-2390 Filed 2-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P