Modifications to Minimum Present Value Requirements for Partial Annuity Distribution Options Under Defined Benefit Pension Plans, 5454-5460 [2012-2341]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5454
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
contract is intended to be a QLAC and
shall contain the following
information—
(i) The name, address, and identifying
number of the issuer of the contract,
along with information on how to
contact the issuer for more information
about the contract;
(ii) The name, address, and
identifying number of the individual in
whose name the contract has been
purchased;
(iii) If the contract was purchased
under a plan, the name of the plan, the
plan number, and the Employer
Identification Number (EIN) of the plan
sponsor;
(iv) If payments have not yet
commenced, the annuity starting date
on which the annuity is scheduled to
commence, the amount of the periodic
annuity payable on that date, and
whether that date may be accelerated;
(v) The amount of each premium paid
for the contract, along with the date of
the premium payment; and
(vi) Such other information as the
Commissioner may require.
(b) Manner and time for filing—(1)
Initial disclosure. The report required by
paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall not
be filed with the Internal Revenue
Service.
(2) Annual report—(i) Timing. The
report required by paragraph (a)(3) of
this section shall be filed in accordance
with the forms and instructions
prescribed by the Commissioner. Such a
report must be filed for each calendar
year beginning with the year in which
premiums for a contract are first paid
and ending with the earlier of the year
in which the individual in whose name
the contract has been purchased attains
age 85 (as adjusted pursuant to
§ 1.401(a)(9)–6, A–17(d)(3)(ii)) or dies.
(ii) Surviving spouse. If the individual
dies and the sole beneficiary under the
contract is the individual’s spouse (in
which case the spouse’s annuity would
not be required to commence until the
individual would have attained age 85),
the report must continue to be filed for
each calendar year until the calendar
year in which the distributions to the
spouse commence or in which the
spouse dies, if earlier.
(c) Issuer statements. (1) Initial
disclosure. Each issuer required to make
a report required by paragraph (a)(2) of
this section shall furnish to the
individual in whose name the contract
has been purchased a statement
containing the information in the report.
The statement shall be furnished at the
time of purchase. The statement is not
required to include information that the
issuer has already provided to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
individual in order to comply with any
applicable state disclosure law.
(2) Annual report. Each issuer
required to file the report required by
paragraph (a)(3) of this section shall
furnish to the individual in whose name
the contract has been purchased a
statement containing the information
required to be furnished in the report,
except that such statement shall be
furnished to a surviving spouse to the
extent that the report is required to be
filed under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section. A copy of the required form
may be used to satisfy the statement
requirement of this paragraph (c)(2). If a
copy of the required form is not used to
satisfy the statement requirement of this
paragraph (c)(2), the statement shall
contain the following language: ‘‘This
information is being furnished to the
Internal Revenue Service.’’ The
statement required by this paragraph
(c)(2) shall be furnished on or before
January 31 following the calendar year
for which the report required by
paragraph (a)(3) of this section is
required.
(d) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012–2340 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–110980–10]
RIN 1545–BJ55
Modifications to Minimum Present
Value Requirements for Partial Annuity
Distribution Options Under Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations providing
guidance relating to the minimum
present value requirements applicable
to certain defined benefit pension plans.
These proposed regulations would
change the regulations regarding the
minimum present value requirements
for defined benefit plan distributions to
permit plans to simplify the treatment of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
certain optional forms of benefit that are
paid partly in the form of an annuity
and partly in a more accelerated form.
These regulations would affect
sponsors, administrators, participants,
and beneficiaries of defined benefit
pension plans. This document also
provides a notice of a public hearing on
these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by May 3, 2012.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for June 1,
2012, must be received by May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–110980–10), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–110980–10),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, or sent electronically,
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–
110980–10). The public hearing will be
held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, Peter J.
Marks or Linda S.F. Marshall at (202)
622–6090; concerning submissions of
comments, the hearing, and/or being
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, Oluwafunmilayo
(Funmi) Taylor at (202) 622–7180 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 401(a)(11) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) provides that, in
order for a defined benefit plan to
qualify under section 401(a), and except
as provided under section 417, in the
case of a vested participant who does
not die before the annuity starting date,
the accrued benefit payable to such
participant must be provided in the
form of a qualified joint and survivor
annuity. In the case of a vested
participant who dies before the annuity
starting date and who has a surviving
spouse, a defined benefit plan must
provide a qualified preretirement
survivor annuity to the surviving spouse
of such participant, except as provided
under section 417.
Section 417(e)(1) provides that a plan
may provide that the present value of a
qualified joint and survivor annuity or
a qualified preretirement survivor
annuity will be immediately distributed
if that present value does not exceed the
amount that can be distributed without
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the participant’s consent under section
411(a)(11). Section 417(e)(2) provides
that, if the present value of the qualified
joint and survivor annuity or the
qualified preretirement survivor annuity
exceeds the amount that can be
distributed without the participant’s
consent under section 411(a)(11), then a
plan may immediately distribute the
present value of a qualified joint and
survivor annuity or the qualified
preretirement survivor annuity only if
the participant and the spouse of the
participant (or where the participant has
died, the surviving spouse) consent in
writing to the distribution.
Section 417(e)(3)(A) provides that the
present value shall not be less than the
present value calculated by using the
applicable mortality table and the
applicable interest rate.1
Section 417(e)(3)(B) of the Code, as
amended by section 302 of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (PPA ’06), Public
Law 109–280, 120 Stat. 780 (2006),
provides that the term ‘‘applicable
mortality table’’ means a mortality table,
modified as appropriate by the
Secretary, based on the mortality table
specified for the plan year under section
430(h)(3)(A) (without regard to section
430(h)(3)(C) or (3)(D)).
Section 417(e)(3)(C) of the Code, as
amended by section 302 of PPA ’06,
provides that the term ‘‘applicable
interest rate’’ means the adjusted first,
second, and third segment rates applied
under rules similar to the rules of
section 430(h)(2)(C) of the Code for the
month before the date of the distribution
or such other time as the Secretary may
prescribe by regulations. Under section
417(e)(3)(D), these rates are to be
determined using the average yields for
a month, rather than the 24-month
average used under section 430(h)(2)(D).
Section 417(e)(3)(D) also provides
special rules applicable for plan years
beginning in 2008 through 2011 under
which the applicable interest rate is
based on a blend of the interest rates
under section 417(e)(3)(C) and the
previously applicable 30-year Treasury
rate.
Section 411(a)(13) of the Code, as
added by section 701(b) of PPA ’06,
provides that an ‘‘applicable defined
benefit plan’’ is not treated as failing to
meet the requirements of section 417(e)
with respect to accrued benefits derived
from employer contributions solely
because the present value of a
participant’s accrued benefit (or any
1 Under section 411(a)(11)(B), the same actuarial
assumptions are used for purposes of determining
whether the present value of a participant’s
nonforfeitable accrued benefit exceeds the
maximum amount that can be immediately
distributed without the participant’s consent.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
portion thereof) may be, under the terms
of the plan, equal to the amount
expressed as the hypothetical account
balance or as an accumulated
percentage of such participant’s final
average compensation. Section
411(a)(13)(C) defines the term
‘‘applicable defined benefit plan’’ to
mean a defined benefit plan under
which the accrued benefit (or any
portion thereof) is calculated as the
balance of a hypothetical account
maintained for the participant or as an
accumulated percentage of the
participant’s final average
compensation.
Section 1107(a)(2) of PPA ’06
provides that a pension plan does not
fail to meet the requirements of section
411(d)(6) by reason of a plan
amendment to which section 1107
applies, except as provided by the
Secretary of the Treasury. Section 1107
of PPA ’06 applies to plan amendments
made pursuant to the provisions of PPA
’06 or regulations issued thereunder that
are adopted no later than a specified
date, generally the last day of the first
plan year beginning on or after January
1, 2009.
Final regulations under section 417
relating to the qualified joint and
survivor and qualified preretirement
survivor annuity requirements were
issued on August 22, 1988. The final
regulations were amended on April 3,
1998, to reflect changes enacted by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Public
Law 103–465 (GATT).
Section 1.417(e)–1(d)(1) provides that
a defined benefit plan generally must
provide that the present value of any
accrued benefit and the amount of any
distribution, including a single sum,
must not be less than the amount
calculated using the specified
applicable interest rate and the specified
applicable mortality table. The present
value of any optional form of benefit
cannot be less than the present value of
the accrued benefit determined in
accordance with the preceding sentence.
Section 1.417(e)–1(d)(6) provides an
exception from the minimum present
value requirements of section 417(e) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). This exception applies
to the amount of a distribution paid in
the form of an annual benefit that either
does not decrease during the life of the
participant (or, in the case of a qualified
preretirement survivor annuity, the life
of the participant’s spouse), or that
decreases during the life of the
participant merely because of the death
of the survivor annuitant (but only if the
reduction is to a level not below 50
percent of the annual benefit payable
before the death of such survivor
annuitant) or the cessation or reduction
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5455
of Social Security supplements or
qualified disability benefits.
Notice 2007–81 2007–2 CB 899
(2007), (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this
chapter) provides guidance on the
corporate bond yield curve and the
segment rates used under section 430, as
well as the interest rates for determining
minimum present values under section
417(e)(3), to implement changes to the
funding rules and minimum present
value requirements made in PPA ’06.
Rev. Rul. 2007–67 2007–2 CB 1047
(2007), (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this
chapter) provides that the applicable
mortality table for a given year applies
to distributions with annuity starting
dates that occur during stability periods
that begin during that calendar year.
Under Rev. Rul. 2007–67, the applicable
mortality table for 2008 was based on a
fixed blend of 50 percent of the static
male combined mortality rates and 50
percent of the static female combined
mortality rates promulgated under
§ 1.430(h)(3)–1(c)(3) of the proposed
regulations (which were later issued as
final regulations). Rev. Rul. 2007–67
provides that updated section 417(e)(3)
applicable mortality tables will be
published for each calendar year in
future guidance and, except as provided
in that future guidance, will be
determined from the section
430(h)(3)(A) tables on the same basis as
the applicable mortality table for 2008.2
Rev. Rul. 2007–67 provides that an
amendment to determine the applicable
interest rate under the section 417(e)(3)
rules in effect for plan years beginning
on or after January 1, 2008, will not
violate section 411(d)(6) solely because
of a reduction in accrued benefits or a
reduction in the amount of any
distribution with an annuity starting
date occurring during a plan year
beginning in 2008 or in a subsequent
year if the cause of such reduction is the
substitution of the modified segment
rates for the 30-year Treasury rate for
the same period. Additionally, Rev. Rul.
2007–67 provides that a plan
amendment to incorporate by reference
the applicable mortality table under
section 417(e)(3) that is prescribed by
Rev. Rul. 2007–67 and by subsequent
guidance will not violate section
411(d)(6) solely because of a reduction
in accrued benefits or a reduction in the
amount of any distribution with an
annuity starting date occurring during a
plan year beginning in 2008 or in a
subsequent year if the cause of such
reduction is the substitution of the
2 Notice 2008–85, 2008–2 CB 905, sets forth the
section 417(e)(3) applicable mortality tables for
distributions with annuity starting dates that occur
during stability periods that begin during calendar
years 2009 through 2013.
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
5456
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
applicable section 417(e)(3) mortality
table for the prior applicable mortality
table under section 417(e)(3).
Rev. Rul. 2007–67 also provides
guidance regarding the applicable
interest rate used under section
417(e)(3) pursuant to the PPA ’06
changes. Pursuant to Rev. Rul. 2007–67,
the rules of §§ 1.417(e)–1(d)(4) and
1.417(e)–1(d)(10)(ii) regarding the time
for determining the applicable interest
rate continue to apply for plan years
beginning on or after January 1, 2008,
without regard to the change in the basis
for determining the applicable interest
rate.
The Worker, Retiree, and Employer
Recovery Act of 2008, Public Law 109–
280 (120 Stat. 780 (2008)), amended
section 415(b)(2)(E)(v) to provide that
the applicable mortality table under
section 417(e)(3)(B) applies for purposes
of adjusting a benefit or limitation
pursuant to section 415(b)(2)(B), (C), or
(D).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Explanation of Provisions
Treatment of Bifurcated Accrued
Benefits
These proposed regulations would
amend the current final regulations
under section 417(e) to permit plans to
simplify the treatment of certain
optional forms of benefit that are paid
partly in the form of an annuity that is
excepted from the minimum present
value requirements of section 417(e)(3)
pursuant to § 1.417(e)–1(d)(6) and partly
in a more accelerated form. Where a
defined benefit plan offers a single-sum
distribution or other form of accelerated
distribution as an optional form of
benefit in addition to the required
qualified joint and survivor annuity,
many participants have been reluctant
to elect lifetime payments to insure
against unexpected longevity, choosing
instead an accelerated distribution form
in order to maximize their liquidity.
However, participants who elect a single
sum or other accelerated form of
distribution may face a greater challenge
in protecting themselves against the risk
of outliving their retirement savings.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
believe that many participants would be
better served by having the opportunity
to elect to receive a portion of their
retirement benefits in annuity form
(which provides financial protection
against unexpected longevity) while
receiving accelerated payments for the
remainder of the benefit to provide
increased liquidity during retirement.
Under current regulations, both portions
of such a distribution option are subject
to the minimum present value
requirements of section 417(e)(3).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
The proposed regulations would
provide an exception to this rule in the
case of a plan with a bifurcated accrued
benefit as defined in the proposed
regulations. Under this exception, such
a plan is permitted to provide that, if a
participant selects two different
distribution options with respect to
separate portions of the bifurcated
accrued benefit, then the two different
distribution options are treated as two
separate optional forms of benefit for
purposes of applying the requirements
of section 417(e)(3). Thus, if this rule
applies to treat two separate distribution
options selected with respect to separate
portions of a bifurcated accrued benefit
as two separate optional forms of
benefit, and one of those separate
optional forms of benefit is exempt from
the requirement to use the section
417(e)(3) assumptions, then that
exemption would apply to that separate
optional form of benefit. In such a case,
the plan would have to apply the
section 417(e)(3) assumptions only to
the separate optional form of benefit
that is not so exempted (rather than
apply those assumptions to the entire
optional form of benefit).
The primary impact of this proposed
change would be to make it simpler and
easier for a plan to offer an optional
form of benefit that is a combination of
a single-sum payment and an annuity.
Allowing a plan to apply a bifurcated
approach would permit the plan to use
the section 417(e)(3) assumptions for the
single-sum portion of the optional form
and its usual annuity equivalence
factors for the annuity portion (rather
than being required to make a special
calculation of the annuity portion using
the section 417(e)(3) assumptions). Not
only would this be simpler
administratively, it would also yield a
more intuitive result.
One type of plan with a bifurcated
accrued benefit that would be eligible
for this treatment is a plan that provides
for two separate portions of the accrued
benefit that are determined without
regard to any election of optional form
of benefit and permits a participant to
choose different forms of benefit with
respect to each of those portions of the
accrued benefit. An example of such a
plan is a plan that has been amended to
accrue benefits under a different plan
formula, where a participant’s benefit is
the sum of the participant’s accrued
benefit for years of service before the
amendment date, determined under the
pre-amendment plan terms, plus the
participant’s accrued benefit for years of
service after the amendment date,
determined under the post-amendment
plan terms, with no interaction between
the two formulas, and the plan permits
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a participant to make separate elections
of optional forms of benefit with respect
to each of those portions of the accrued
benefit.
A second type of plan with a
bifurcated accrued benefit that would be
eligible for this treatment is a plan that
provides for a participant to apply
different distribution elections to
different portions of the accrued benefit
so that the amount of the distribution,
with respect to the distribution election
applied to its respective portion of the
accrued benefit, is the pro rata portion
of the amount of the distribution that
would be determined if that distribution
election had been applied to the entire
accrued benefit. An example of such a
plan is a plan that provides both a
single-sum option and a joint and
survivor option for the entire benefit,
but allows a participant to select an
optional form which is 25 percent of the
full lump sum and 75 percent of the full
joint and survivor annuity.
A third type of plan with a bifurcated
accrued benefit that would be eligible
for this treatment is a plan that provides
a single-sum distribution option with
respect to only a portion of the benefit
and provides a separate benefit election
for the remainder of the distribution. In
order to satisfy the requirements to be
this type of plan with a bifurcated
accrued benefit, the amount of the
distribution that is not paid in a single
sum must be no less than the amount
that would be payable under the rules
described in the prior paragraph had a
single sum election been available with
respect to the entire accrued benefit,
where the single sum is determined as
the present value of the accrued benefit
payable at normal retirement age (or the
immediate annuity if the participant is
older than normal retirement age)
determined using the applicable interest
rates and the applicable mortality table.
An example of such a plan is a plan that
provides that a participant can elect to
receive in a single sum an amount equal
to the employee contributions,
accumulated with interest, with the
remainder of the accrued benefit paid
under one of the annuity optional forms
of benefit available under the plan in an
amount sufficient to satisfy the
requirements under the proposed
regulations.
As previously discussed, the
proposed regulations would make the
bifurcation of benefits for purposes of
section 417(e)(3) conditional on the
existence of plan terms that explicitly
provide that, if a participant selects two
different distribution options with
respect to separate portions of the
bifurcated accrued benefit, then the two
different distribution options are treated
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
as two separate optional forms of benefit
for purposes of applying the
requirements of section 417(e)(3). To
provide for such bifurcated treatment, a
plan sponsor would be required to
amend its plan to provide for use of the
plan factors that generally apply to
annuity distributions instead of the
section 417(e)(3) assumptions in these
circumstances. Any plan amendment
must comply with the requirements of
section 411(d)(6). See the discussion in
this preamble under the heading
‘‘Effective/Applicability Date.’’
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize that additional modifications
to the regulations under section
417(e)(3) are needed in light of the
enactment of PPA ‘06. It is expected that
additional proposed amendments to the
regulations under section 417(e)(3) will
be issued to reflect statutory changes
and to make other clarifications.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to be
effective on the date of publication of
the Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
The changes under the proposed
regulations are proposed to apply to
distributions with annuity starting dates
in plan years beginning after the
publication date of final regulations. If
the regulations are finalized as proposed
and a plan that previously provided for
a partial single-sum distribution
together with a specified annuity
distribution is amended to treat that
distribution form as a bifurcated
accrued benefit (and applies less
favorable actuarial factors to the portion
of the benefit that is not subject to
section 417(e)(3)), then the plan must
comply with the requirements of section
411(d)(6). This can be done by
providing that, after the applicable
amendment date under § 1.411(d)–
3(g)(4), the amount of each portion of a
distribution is not less than the amount
that would have been payable under the
plan provisions in effect before the
amendment applied to the participant’s
accrued benefit as of the applicable
amendment date.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rule making is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because the
proposed regulation does not impose a
collection of information on small
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
this notice of proposed rule making has
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of these
proposed regulations. In particular, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments regarding whether
the special rules in these proposed
regulations regarding bifurcated accrued
benefits should be extended to any
types of benefits that are not covered by
the rules in these proposed regulations.
All comments will be available for
public inspection or copying at
www.regulations.gov or upon request. A
public hearing has been scheduled for
June 1, 2012, beginning at 10 a.m. in the
Auditorium, Internal Revenue Service,
1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. Due to building
security procedures, visitors must enter
at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written or electronic
comments by May 3, 2012, and an
outline of topics to be discussed and the
amount of time to be devoted to each
topic (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) by May 11, 2012. A period of 10
minutes will be allotted to each person
for making comments. An agenda
showing the scheduling of the speakers
will be prepared after the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed. Copies of
the agenda will be available free of
charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Peter J. Marks and Linda
S.F. Marshall, Office of Division
Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5457
Exempt and Government Entities).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and the Treasury Department
participated in the development of these
regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.417(e)–1 is amended
by:
1. Redesignating paragraph (d)(1) as
newly designated paragraph (d)(1)(i)
and revising the heading of the newly
designated paragraph (d)(1)(i).
2. Adding a new paragraph (d)(1)(ii).
3. Revising paragraphs (d)(7) and
(d)(8)(i).
4. Adding a new paragraph (d)(8)(v).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 1.417(e)–1 Restrictions and valuations of
distributions from plans subject to sections
401(a)(11) and 417.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Present value requirement—(1)
General rule—(i) Defined benefit plans.
* * *
(ii) Defined contribution plans.
Because the accrued benefit under a
defined contribution plan equals the
account balance, a defined contribution
plan is not subject to the requirements
of this paragraph (d), regardless of
whether the requirements of section
401(a)(11) apply to the plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Permitted bifurcation of certain
optional forms of benefit—(i) General
rule. A plan with a bifurcated accrued
benefit (as described in paragraph
(d)(7)(ii) of this section) is permitted to
provide that, if a participant selects two
different distribution options with
respect to separate portions of the
bifurcated accrued benefit, then the two
different distribution options are treated
as two separate optional forms of benefit
for purposes of applying the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
this paragraph (d). Thus, if this
paragraph (d)(7) applies to treat two
separate distribution options selected
with respect to separate portions of a
bifurcated accrued benefit as two
separate optional forms of benefit, and
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5458
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the exception from the application of
paragraph (d) of this section that is
contained in paragraph (d)(6) of this
section applies to one of those optional
forms of benefit, then this paragraph (d)
applies only to the optional form of
benefit to which the exception under
paragraph (d)(6) of this section does not
apply.
(ii) Bifurcated accrued benefit—(A) In
general. A plan provides a bifurcated
accrued benefit within the meaning of
this paragraph (d)(7)(ii) if the plan
satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(d)(7)(iii) of this section (relating to
separately determined benefits),
(d)(7)(iv) of this section (relating to
separate distribution options for
proportionate benefits), or (d)(7)(v) of
this section (relating to single sum with
separate distribution option for
remainder).
(B) Rules of operation. If a plan
provides a bifurcated accrued benefit
within the meaning of this paragraph
(d)(7)(ii), and one portion of the benefits
under the plan would itself be a
bifurcated accrued benefit if it were the
entire accrued benefit, then the rules of
paragraph (d)(7)(i) of this section may be
re-applied to such portion.
(iii) Separately determined benefits. A
plan satisfies the requirements of this
paragraph (d)(7)(iii) if the plan provides
for two separate portions of the accrued
benefit that are determined without
regard to any election of optional form
of benefit and permits a participant to
select different distribution options with
respect to each of those portions of the
accrued benefit.
(iv) Separate elections for
proportionate benefits. A plan satisfies
the requirements of this paragraph
(d)(7)(iv) if—
(A) The plan provides for a
participant to select one distribution
option with respect to a portion of the
accrued benefit and a different
distribution option with respect to the
remaining portion of the accrued
benefit;
(B) The distribution option selected
with respect to each of the separate
portions of the accrued benefit is
available with respect to the entire
accrued benefit; and
(C) The amount of the distribution
with respect to each distribution option
applied to its respective portion of the
accrued benefit is the pro rata portion of
the amount of the distribution that
would be determined if that distribution
option had been applied to the entire
accrued benefit.
(v) Single sum with separate election
for remainder. A plan satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph (d)(7)(v)
if—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
(A) The plan provides for a specified
amount to be distributed in a single
sum, with the remainder distributed as
another distribution option payable
under the plan;
(B) A single-sum distribution is not
available with respect to the
participant’s entire accrued benefit; and
(C) The amount of the distribution
that is not paid in a single sum is not
less than the amount that would be
payable if—
(1) A single sum election were
available with respect to the entire
accrued benefit, where the single sum is
the present value of the accrued benefit
payable at normal retirement age (or the
immediate annuity if the participant is
older than normal retirement age)
determined using the applicable interest
rates and the applicable mortality table;
(2) The participant elected to receive
the specified amount in a single sum;
and
(3) The rules of paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of
this section were applied to determine
the amount of the distribution that is
not paid in a single sum.
(vi) Examples. The following
examples illustrate the rules of this
paragraph (d)(7). Unless otherwise
indicated, these examples are based on
the following assumptions: Each plan is
a single-employer defined benefit plan
with a calendar-year plan year, a oneyear stability period coinciding with the
calendar year, and a one-month
lookback used for determining the
applicable interest rate. The normal
retirement age is 65, and all participant
elections are made with proper spousal
consent. In addition, these examples
reflect the amendments to sections 417
and 411 that were made in the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, Public Law 109–
280, 120 Stat. 780 (2006).
Example 1. (i) Plan B offers a number of
optional forms of payment, including a
qualified joint and survivor annuity and a
single-sum payment. The single-sum
payment is equal to the present value of the
participant’s immediate benefit (but no less
than the present value of the participant’s
accrued benefit) using the applicable interest
and mortality rates under section 417(e)(3).
The amount of the joint and survivor annuity
is determined using plan factors that are not
based on the applicable interest and
mortality rates under section 417(e)(3). Plan
B permits a participant to elect to receive a
percentage of the accrued benefit chosen by
the participant as a single sum and the
remainder in any annuity form provided
under the plan, with both portions of the
payment determined by multiplying the
amount that would be payable if the entire
benefit were paid in that form by the
percentage that applies to that distribution
option. Plan B provides that, with respect to
a distribution that is paid partly in the form
of a single sum and partly in the form of an
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
annuity, the single sum and the annuity are
treated as two separate optional forms of
benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). Assume that the December
2012 segment rates are 3.21%, 5.19% and
5.67% for purposes of this example.
(ii) Participant S retires at age 62 in 2013,
with an accrued benefit of $1,000 per month
payable as a straight life annuity at normal
retirement age. Participant S is eligible for an
unreduced early retirement benefit and can
therefore collect a straight life annuity benefit
of $1,000 per month beginning immediately.
Alternatively, Participant S can elect to
receive the benefit in other forms, including
a single-sum payment of $153,852 (based on
the applicable interest rate and mortality
table under section 417(e), which are the
2013 applicable mortality table and the
December 2012 segment rates), or a 100%
joint and survivor annuity of $850 per month
(based on the plan’s annuity conversion
factors). Participant S elects to receive 25%
of the benefit in the form of a single-sum
payment and the balance as a 100% joint and
survivor annuity.
(iii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(iv)
of this section, Plan B provides for a
bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan B
provides for a participant to select a singlesum distribution with respect to a portion of
the accrued benefit and an annuity
distribution option with respect to the
remaining portion of the accrued benefit.
Each distribution option is available with
respect to the entire accrued benefit, and the
amount of the distribution with respect to
each distribution option applied to its
respective portion of the accrued benefit is
the pro rata portion of the amount of the
distribution that would be determined if that
distribution option had been applied to the
entire accrued benefit. Furthermore, Plan B
provides that the two different distribution
options selected with respect to each of those
portions of the accrued benefit are treated as
two separate optional forms of benefit for
purposes of applying the provisions of Plan
B implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and § 1.417(e)–1(d). Accordingly,
Participant S receives a single sum payment
equal to 25% of the full single sum amount,
or $38,463. In addition, Participant S receives
a 100% joint and survivor annuity in the
amount of $637.50 per month, equal to 75%
of the full joint and survivor benefit of $850
per month otherwise payable. The joint and
survivor benefit is not subject to the
minimum present value requirements of
section 417(e)(3) because it is treated as a
separate optional form of benefit under
paragraph (d)(7)(i) of this section.
Example 2. (i) Plan C permits participants
to elect a partial single sum equal to
employee contributions, accumulated with
interest. Any other amounts must be paid in
the form of an annuity. Under the terms of
Plan C, if a participant elects to receive this
partial single sum, the annuity benefit
payable to the participant is at least as great
as the minimum amount determined
pursuant to paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this
section. Plan C provides that, with respect to
a distribution that is paid partly in the form
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
of a single sum and partly in the form of an
annuity, the single sum and the annuity are
treated as two separate optional forms of
benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). Participant T retires at age 60
in 2013 with an accrued benefit of $1,500 per
month payable as a straight life annuity
payable at normal retirement age. Based on
the plan’s early retirement and optional form
factors (which are not based on the
applicable interest and mortality rates under
section 417(e)(3)), Participant T’s benefit
commencing at age 60 in the form of a 10year certain and continuous annuity would
be $925 per month. Participant T elects to
receive a single sum payment of $32,000
equal to T’s accumulated contributions with
interest, and the remainder as a 10-year
certain and continuous annuity. Assume that
the December 2012 segment rates are the
same as those assumed in Example 1. Based
on the applicable mortality table for 2013 and
the December 2012 segment rates, the
deferred annuity factor at age 60 for lifetime
payments commencing at age 65 is 8.769.
(ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(v)
of this section, Plan C provides for a
bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan C
provides for a specified amount to be
distributed in a single sum, with the
remainder distributed as another distribution
option payable under the plan, a single-sum
distribution is not available with respect to
a participant’s entire accrued benefit, and the
amount of the distribution that is not paid in
a single sum meets the requirements of
paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this section.
Furthermore, Plan C provides that, with
respect to a distribution that is paid partly in
the form of a single sum and partly in the
form of an annuity, the single sum and the
annuity are treated as two separate optional
forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). Accordingly, the rule for
proportional benefits under paragraph
(d)(7)(iv) of this section is applied to
determine the minimum amount of
Participant T’s annuity as if a single sum
payment were available, equal to the present
value of T’s full accrued benefit. If Plan C
had offered a single sum payment option
with respect to Participant T’s full accrued
benefit of $1,500 per month, the minimum
present value based on the applicable
mortality table for 2013 and the assumed
December 2012 segment rates would have
been $1,500 × 12 × the deferred annuity
factor of 8.769, or $157,842. The single sum
payment actually available to Participant T
under the provisions of Plan C is the amount
of accumulated contributions with interest,
or $32,000 which represents 20.27% of the
single sum value of Participant T’s full
accrued benefit ($32,000 ÷ $157,842 =
20.27%).
(iii) Therefore, the portion of T’s accrued
benefit not payable as a single sum must be
at least as great as the amount based on the
remaining 79.73% of T’s benefit multiplied
by the accrued benefit of $1,500 per month,
or $1,195.95 per month payable at normal
retirement age. Based on Plan C’s early
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
retirement and optional form factors, the
annuity benefit payable to Participant T in
the form of a 10-year certain and continuous
annuity beginning at age 60 cannot be less
than $925 times 79.73% or $737.50 per
month. Participant T receives this in addition
to the single sum payment of $32,000. The
10-year certain and continuous benefit is not
subject to the minimum present value
requirements of section 417(e)(3) because it
is treated as a separate optional form of
benefit under paragraph (d)(7)(i) of this
section.
Example 3. (i) Plan D permits participants
to elect a single-sum payment of up to
$10,000 with the remaining benefit payable
in the form of an annuity. Under the terms
of Plan D, if a participant elects to receive
this partial single sum, the annuity benefit
payable to the participant is at least as great
as the minimum amount determined
pursuant to paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this
section. Plan D provides that, with respect to
a distribution that is paid partly in the form
of a single sum and partly in the form of an
annuity, the single sum and the annuity are
treated as two separate optional forms of
benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). Participant W retires in 2013
at age 55 with an accrued benefit of $1,000
per month payable at normal retirement age.
Participant W is eligible for an unreduced
early retirement benefit of $1,000 per month
payable as a straight life annuity.
Alternatively, based on Plan D’s definition of
actuarial equivalence (which is not based on
the applicable interest and mortality rates
under section 417(e)(3)), Participant W can
receive an immediate benefit in the form of
a 100% joint-and-survivor annuity of $800
per month. Participant W elects to receive a
single sum payment of $10,000, with the
balance of the benefit payable as a 100%
joint-and-survivor annuity beginning at age
55. Assume that the December 2012 segment
rates are the same as those assumed in
Example 1. Based on the applicable mortality
table for 2013 and the December 2012
segment rates, the deferred annuity factor at
age 55 for lifetime payments commencing at
age 65 is 6.558.
(ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(v)
of this section, Plan D provides for a
bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan D
provides for a specified amount to be
distributed in a single sum, with the
remainder distributed as another distribution
option payable under the plan, a single-sum
distribution is not available with respect to
a participant’s entire accrued benefit, and the
amount of the distribution that is not paid in
a single sum meets the requirements of
paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this section.
Furthermore, Plan D provides that, with
respect to a distribution that is paid partly in
the form of a single sum and partly in the
form of an annuity, the single sum and the
annuity are treated as two separate optional
forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). Accordingly, the rule for
proportional benefits under paragraph
(d)(7)(iv) of this section is applied to
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5459
determine the minimum amount of
Participant W’s annuity as if a single sum
payment were available, equal to the present
value of W’s full accrued benefit.
(iii) If Plan D had offered a single sum
payment option with respect to Participant
W’s full accrued benefit of $1,000 per month,
the minimum present value based on the
applicable mortality table for 2013 and the
assumed December 2012 segment rates
would have been $1,000 × 12 × the deferred
annuity factor of 6.558, or $78,696. The
single sum payment actually available to
Participant W under the provisions of Plan D
is $10,000, which represents 12.71% of the
single sum value of W’s full accrued benefit
($10,000 ÷ $78,696 = 12.71%).
(iv) Therefore, the portion of Participant
W’s accrued benefit not payable as a single
sum must be at least as great as the amount
based on the remaining 87.29% of W’s
benefit multiplied by the accrued benefit of
$1,000 per month, or $872.90 per month
payable at normal retirement age. Based on
Plan D’s early retirement and optional form
factors, the annuity benefit payable to
Participant W in the form of a 100% jointand-survivor annuity beginning at age 55 is
no less than 87.29% × $800, or $698.32 per
month. Participant W receives this in
addition to the single sum payment of
$10,000. The joint and survivor annuity
benefit is not subject to the minimum present
value requirements of section 417(e)(3)
because it is treated as a separate optional
form of benefit under paragraph (d)(7)(i) of
this section.
Example 4. (i) Plan E was amended to
freeze benefits under the traditional plan
formula as of December 31, 2012, and to
provide benefits under a cash balance
formula beginning January 1, 2013. The plan
provides that participants may elect separate
distribution options for the portion of the
benefit accrued under the traditional formula
as of December 31, 2012, and the portion of
the benefit earned under the cash balance
formula. Furthermore, the plan provides that
a participant may elect to receive a singlesum payment only with respect to the
portion of the benefit earned under the cash
balance formula. Plan E provides that the two
distribution options selected with respect to
the portion of the benefit accrued under the
traditional formula as of December 31, 2012,
and the portion of the benefit earned under
the cash balance formula are treated as two
separate optional forms of benefit for
purposes of applying the provisions of Plan
E implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and § 1.417(e)–1(d).
(ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(iii)
of this section, Plan E provides for a
bifurcated accrued benefit because the
portion of the accrued benefit determined
under the traditional formula and the portion
of the accrued benefit determined under the
cash balance formula are determined
separately without regard to any election of
optional form of benefit and Plan E permits
a participant to select different distribution
options with respect to both of those portions
of the accrued benefit. Furthermore, as
permitted by paragraph (d)(7)(i) of this
section, Plan E provides that the two
different distribution options selected with
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5460
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
respect to each of those portions of the
accrued benefit are treated as two separate
optional forms of benefit for purposes of
applying the provisions of Plan E
implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and § 1.417(e)–1(d). Therefore,
whether a participant elects to receive a
single sum payment of the portion of the
benefit earned under the cash balance
formula does not affect whether the
distribution elected with respect to the
portion of the benefit earned as of December
31, 2012, is subject to the minimum present
value requirements of section 417(e)(3).
Example 5. (i) The facts are the same as
in Example 4, except that Plan E also permits
a participant to elect, with respect to the cash
balance portion of the benefit, to receive a
percentage of the accrued benefit chosen by
the participant as a single sum and the
remainder in any annuity form provided
under the plan, with both portions of the
payment determined by multiplying the
amount that would be payable if the entire
benefit were paid in that form by the
percentage that applies to that distribution
option. Plan E provides that, with respect to
such a distribution that is paid partly in the
form of a single sum and partly in the form
of an annuity, the single sum and the annuity
are treated as two separate optional forms of
benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the
requirements of section 417(e)(3) and
§ 1.417(e)–1(d). Participant X retires at age
65, with an accrued benefit under the
traditional formula of $500 per month
(earned as of December 31, 2012), and a cash
balance hypothetical account of $45,000.
Based on Plan E’s actuarial equivalence
factors, Participant X’s accrued benefit
derived from the cash balance hypothetical
account is $320 per month, payable as a life
annuity at normal retirement. Participant V
elects to receive $15,000 of the current
hypothetical account balance in the form of
a single sum and to receive the remainder of
the total accrued benefit as a life annuity.
(ii) Under the analysis set forth in Example
4, Plan E provides for a bifurcated accrued
benefit in accordance with paragraph
(d)(7)(C) of this section with respect to the
portion of the accrued benefit attributable to
the benefit accrued as of December 31, 2012,
and the portion of the accrued benefit
attributable to the benefit earned under the
cash balance formula. Furthermore, Plan E
provides that the two different distribution
options selected with respect to each of those
portions of the accrued benefit are treated as
two separate optional forms of benefit for
purposes of applying the provisions of Plan
E implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and § 1.417(e)–1(d). Thus, a
separate distribution option may be chosen
for each of these two portions, and section
417(e)(3) applies separately to each portion.
(iii) In accordance with paragraphs
(d)(7)(ii)(B) and (d)(7)(iv) of this section, the
portion of the accrued benefit under Plan E
earned under the cash balance formula is also
a bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan E
provides for a participant to select a singlesum distribution with respect to a portion of
the cash balance formula accrued benefit and
an annuity distribution option with respect
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:47 Feb 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
to the remaining portion of the cash balance
formula accrued benefit, each distribution
option is available with respect to the entire
cash balance formula accrued benefit, and
the amount of the distribution with respect
to each distribution option applied to its
respective portion of the cash balance
formula accrued benefit is the pro rata
portion of the amount of the distribution that
would be determined if that distribution
option had been applied to the entire cash
balance formula accrued benefit.
Furthermore, Plan E provides that the two
different distribution options selected with
respect to each of those portions of the cash
balance formula accrued benefit are treated
as two separate optional forms of benefit for
purposes of applying the provisions of Plan
E implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and § 1.417(e)–1(d). Thus, under
paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of this section, 1⁄3 of the
cash balance hypothetical account is paid as
a single sum (that is, $15,000 ÷ $45,000), and
the remaining 2⁄3 of the cash balance
hypothetical account, or $30,000, is
converted to an annuity benefit of 2⁄3 × $320,
or $213.33 per month.
(iv) Participant X therefore receives a
single sum payment of $15,000, representing
the portion of the current hypothetical
account balance that X elected to receive as
a single sum. In addition, Participant X
receives a monthly life annuity of $713.33
per month (equal to the $500 benefit
attributable to the benefit earned as of
December 31, 2012, plus the $213.33 portion
of the cash balance benefit paid as an
annuity). Participant X’s election to receive a
single sum payment of part of the benefit
earned under the cash balance formula does
not affect whether the remainder of
Participant X’s distribution is subject to the
minimum present value requirements of
section 417(e)(3).
(8) Effective/applicability date—(i) In
general. Except as otherwise provided
in this paragraph (d)(8), this paragraph
(d) applies to distributions with annuity
starting dates in plan years beginning on
or after January 1, 1995.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Paragraph (d)(7) of this section
applies to distributions with annuity
starting dates in plan years beginning on
or after the date final regulations that
finalize these proposed regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012–2341 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
27 CFR Part 478
[Docket No. ATF 32P; AG Order No. 3321–
2012]
RIN 1140–AA38
Federal Firearms License
Proceedings—Hearings (2008R–15P)
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice is
proposing to amend the regulations of
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF)
regarding administrative hearings held
as part of firearms license proceedings.
This proposed rule clarifies that such
hearings are held in an informal setting
and that persons requesting a hearing
will be afforded the opportunity to
submit facts, arguments, offers of
settlement, or proposals of adjustment
for review and consideration. The
proposed regulations are intended to
ensure that federal firearms licensees
and persons applying for a federal
firearms license are familiar with the
hearing process relative to the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a firearms
license, or imposition of a civil fine.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked and electronic comments
must be submitted on or before May 3,
2012. Commenters should be aware that
the electronic Federal Docket
Management System will not accept
comments after Midnight Eastern Time
on the last day of the comment period.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to any of
the following addresses—
• Deborah G. Szczenski, Industry
Operations Specialist (Regulations),
Mailstop 6N–602, Enforcement
Programs and Services, Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, 99 New York Avenue NE.,
Washington, DC 20226; Attn: ATF 32P.
Written comments must appear in a
minimum 12-point size of type (.17
inches), include your mailing address,
be signed, and may be of any length.
• (202) 648–9741 (facsimile).
• https://www.regulations.gov. Federal
eRulemaking portal; follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
You may also view an electronic
version of this proposed rule at the
https://www.regulations.gov site.
See the Public Participation section at
the end of the SUPPLEMENTARY
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 23 (Friday, February 3, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5454-5460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2341]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-110980-10]
RIN 1545-BJ55
Modifications to Minimum Present Value Requirements for Partial
Annuity Distribution Options Under Defined Benefit Pension Plans
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations providing guidance
relating to the minimum present value requirements applicable to
certain defined benefit pension plans. These proposed regulations would
change the regulations regarding the minimum present value requirements
for defined benefit plan distributions to permit plans to simplify the
treatment of certain optional forms of benefit that are paid partly in
the form of an annuity and partly in a more accelerated form. These
regulations would affect sponsors, administrators, participants, and
beneficiaries of defined benefit pension plans. This document also
provides a notice of a public hearing on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by May 3, 2012.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing scheduled for
June 1, 2012, must be received by May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-110980-10), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
110980-10), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-110980-10).
The public hearing will be held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Peter J.
Marks or Linda S.F. Marshall at (202) 622-6090; concerning submissions
of comments, the hearing, and/or being placed on the building access
list to attend the hearing, Oluwafunmilayo (Funmi) Taylor at (202) 622-
7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 401(a)(11) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) provides
that, in order for a defined benefit plan to qualify under section
401(a), and except as provided under section 417, in the case of a
vested participant who does not die before the annuity starting date,
the accrued benefit payable to such participant must be provided in the
form of a qualified joint and survivor annuity. In the case of a vested
participant who dies before the annuity starting date and who has a
surviving spouse, a defined benefit plan must provide a qualified
preretirement survivor annuity to the surviving spouse of such
participant, except as provided under section 417.
Section 417(e)(1) provides that a plan may provide that the present
value of a qualified joint and survivor annuity or a qualified
preretirement survivor annuity will be immediately distributed if that
present value does not exceed the amount that can be distributed
without
[[Page 5455]]
the participant's consent under section 411(a)(11). Section 417(e)(2)
provides that, if the present value of the qualified joint and survivor
annuity or the qualified preretirement survivor annuity exceeds the
amount that can be distributed without the participant's consent under
section 411(a)(11), then a plan may immediately distribute the present
value of a qualified joint and survivor annuity or the qualified
preretirement survivor annuity only if the participant and the spouse
of the participant (or where the participant has died, the surviving
spouse) consent in writing to the distribution.
Section 417(e)(3)(A) provides that the present value shall not be
less than the present value calculated by using the applicable
mortality table and the applicable interest rate.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under section 411(a)(11)(B), the same actuarial assumptions
are used for purposes of determining whether the present value of a
participant's nonforfeitable accrued benefit exceeds the maximum
amount that can be immediately distributed without the participant's
consent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 417(e)(3)(B) of the Code, as amended by section 302 of the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA '06), Public Law 109-280, 120 Stat.
780 (2006), provides that the term ``applicable mortality table'' means
a mortality table, modified as appropriate by the Secretary, based on
the mortality table specified for the plan year under section
430(h)(3)(A) (without regard to section 430(h)(3)(C) or (3)(D)).
Section 417(e)(3)(C) of the Code, as amended by section 302 of PPA
'06, provides that the term ``applicable interest rate'' means the
adjusted first, second, and third segment rates applied under rules
similar to the rules of section 430(h)(2)(C) of the Code for the month
before the date of the distribution or such other time as the Secretary
may prescribe by regulations. Under section 417(e)(3)(D), these rates
are to be determined using the average yields for a month, rather than
the 24-month average used under section 430(h)(2)(D). Section
417(e)(3)(D) also provides special rules applicable for plan years
beginning in 2008 through 2011 under which the applicable interest rate
is based on a blend of the interest rates under section 417(e)(3)(C)
and the previously applicable 30-year Treasury rate.
Section 411(a)(13) of the Code, as added by section 701(b) of PPA
'06, provides that an ``applicable defined benefit plan'' is not
treated as failing to meet the requirements of section 417(e) with
respect to accrued benefits derived from employer contributions solely
because the present value of a participant's accrued benefit (or any
portion thereof) may be, under the terms of the plan, equal to the
amount expressed as the hypothetical account balance or as an
accumulated percentage of such participant's final average
compensation. Section 411(a)(13)(C) defines the term ``applicable
defined benefit plan'' to mean a defined benefit plan under which the
accrued benefit (or any portion thereof) is calculated as the balance
of a hypothetical account maintained for the participant or as an
accumulated percentage of the participant's final average compensation.
Section 1107(a)(2) of PPA '06 provides that a pension plan does not
fail to meet the requirements of section 411(d)(6) by reason of a plan
amendment to which section 1107 applies, except as provided by the
Secretary of the Treasury. Section 1107 of PPA '06 applies to plan
amendments made pursuant to the provisions of PPA '06 or regulations
issued thereunder that are adopted no later than a specified date,
generally the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after
January 1, 2009.
Final regulations under section 417 relating to the qualified joint
and survivor and qualified preretirement survivor annuity requirements
were issued on August 22, 1988. The final regulations were amended on
April 3, 1998, to reflect changes enacted by the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, Public Law 103-465 (GATT).
Section 1.417(e)-1(d)(1) provides that a defined benefit plan
generally must provide that the present value of any accrued benefit
and the amount of any distribution, including a single sum, must not be
less than the amount calculated using the specified applicable interest
rate and the specified applicable mortality table. The present value of
any optional form of benefit cannot be less than the present value of
the accrued benefit determined in accordance with the preceding
sentence.
Section 1.417(e)-1(d)(6) provides an exception from the minimum
present value requirements of section 417(e) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d).
This exception applies to the amount of a distribution paid in the form
of an annual benefit that either does not decrease during the life of
the participant (or, in the case of a qualified preretirement survivor
annuity, the life of the participant's spouse), or that decreases
during the life of the participant merely because of the death of the
survivor annuitant (but only if the reduction is to a level not below
50 percent of the annual benefit payable before the death of such
survivor annuitant) or the cessation or reduction of Social Security
supplements or qualified disability benefits.
Notice 2007-81 2007-2 CB 899 (2007), (see Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) provides guidance on the
corporate bond yield curve and the segment rates used under section
430, as well as the interest rates for determining minimum present
values under section 417(e)(3), to implement changes to the funding
rules and minimum present value requirements made in PPA '06.
Rev. Rul. 2007-67 2007-2 CB 1047 (2007), (see Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) provides that the applicable
mortality table for a given year applies to distributions with annuity
starting dates that occur during stability periods that begin during
that calendar year. Under Rev. Rul. 2007-67, the applicable mortality
table for 2008 was based on a fixed blend of 50 percent of the static
male combined mortality rates and 50 percent of the static female
combined mortality rates promulgated under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(c)(3) of
the proposed regulations (which were later issued as final
regulations). Rev. Rul. 2007-67 provides that updated section 417(e)(3)
applicable mortality tables will be published for each calendar year in
future guidance and, except as provided in that future guidance, will
be determined from the section 430(h)(3)(A) tables on the same basis as
the applicable mortality table for 2008.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Notice 2008-85, 2008-2 CB 905, sets forth the section
417(e)(3) applicable mortality tables for distributions with annuity
starting dates that occur during stability periods that begin during
calendar years 2009 through 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rev. Rul. 2007-67 provides that an amendment to determine the
applicable interest rate under the section 417(e)(3) rules in effect
for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, will not violate
section 411(d)(6) solely because of a reduction in accrued benefits or
a reduction in the amount of any distribution with an annuity starting
date occurring during a plan year beginning in 2008 or in a subsequent
year if the cause of such reduction is the substitution of the modified
segment rates for the 30-year Treasury rate for the same period.
Additionally, Rev. Rul. 2007-67 provides that a plan amendment to
incorporate by reference the applicable mortality table under section
417(e)(3) that is prescribed by Rev. Rul. 2007-67 and by subsequent
guidance will not violate section 411(d)(6) solely because of a
reduction in accrued benefits or a reduction in the amount of any
distribution with an annuity starting date occurring during a plan year
beginning in 2008 or in a subsequent year if the cause of such
reduction is the substitution of the
[[Page 5456]]
applicable section 417(e)(3) mortality table for the prior applicable
mortality table under section 417(e)(3).
Rev. Rul. 2007-67 also provides guidance regarding the applicable
interest rate used under section 417(e)(3) pursuant to the PPA '06
changes. Pursuant to Rev. Rul. 2007-67, the rules of Sec. Sec.
1.417(e)-1(d)(4) and 1.417(e)-1(d)(10)(ii) regarding the time for
determining the applicable interest rate continue to apply for plan
years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, without regard to the
change in the basis for determining the applicable interest rate.
The Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008, Public Law
109-280 (120 Stat. 780 (2008)), amended section 415(b)(2)(E)(v) to
provide that the applicable mortality table under section 417(e)(3)(B)
applies for purposes of adjusting a benefit or limitation pursuant to
section 415(b)(2)(B), (C), or (D).
Explanation of Provisions
Treatment of Bifurcated Accrued Benefits
These proposed regulations would amend the current final
regulations under section 417(e) to permit plans to simplify the
treatment of certain optional forms of benefit that are paid partly in
the form of an annuity that is excepted from the minimum present value
requirements of section 417(e)(3) pursuant to Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d)(6)
and partly in a more accelerated form. Where a defined benefit plan
offers a single-sum distribution or other form of accelerated
distribution as an optional form of benefit in addition to the required
qualified joint and survivor annuity, many participants have been
reluctant to elect lifetime payments to insure against unexpected
longevity, choosing instead an accelerated distribution form in order
to maximize their liquidity. However, participants who elect a single
sum or other accelerated form of distribution may face a greater
challenge in protecting themselves against the risk of outliving their
retirement savings.
The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that many participants
would be better served by having the opportunity to elect to receive a
portion of their retirement benefits in annuity form (which provides
financial protection against unexpected longevity) while receiving
accelerated payments for the remainder of the benefit to provide
increased liquidity during retirement. Under current regulations, both
portions of such a distribution option are subject to the minimum
present value requirements of section 417(e)(3).
The proposed regulations would provide an exception to this rule in
the case of a plan with a bifurcated accrued benefit as defined in the
proposed regulations. Under this exception, such a plan is permitted to
provide that, if a participant selects two different distribution
options with respect to separate portions of the bifurcated accrued
benefit, then the two different distribution options are treated as two
separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
requirements of section 417(e)(3). Thus, if this rule applies to treat
two separate distribution options selected with respect to separate
portions of a bifurcated accrued benefit as two separate optional forms
of benefit, and one of those separate optional forms of benefit is
exempt from the requirement to use the section 417(e)(3) assumptions,
then that exemption would apply to that separate optional form of
benefit. In such a case, the plan would have to apply the section
417(e)(3) assumptions only to the separate optional form of benefit
that is not so exempted (rather than apply those assumptions to the
entire optional form of benefit).
The primary impact of this proposed change would be to make it
simpler and easier for a plan to offer an optional form of benefit that
is a combination of a single-sum payment and an annuity. Allowing a
plan to apply a bifurcated approach would permit the plan to use the
section 417(e)(3) assumptions for the single-sum portion of the
optional form and its usual annuity equivalence factors for the annuity
portion (rather than being required to make a special calculation of
the annuity portion using the section 417(e)(3) assumptions). Not only
would this be simpler administratively, it would also yield a more
intuitive result.
One type of plan with a bifurcated accrued benefit that would be
eligible for this treatment is a plan that provides for two separate
portions of the accrued benefit that are determined without regard to
any election of optional form of benefit and permits a participant to
choose different forms of benefit with respect to each of those
portions of the accrued benefit. An example of such a plan is a plan
that has been amended to accrue benefits under a different plan
formula, where a participant's benefit is the sum of the participant's
accrued benefit for years of service before the amendment date,
determined under the pre-amendment plan terms, plus the participant's
accrued benefit for years of service after the amendment date,
determined under the post-amendment plan terms, with no interaction
between the two formulas, and the plan permits a participant to make
separate elections of optional forms of benefit with respect to each of
those portions of the accrued benefit.
A second type of plan with a bifurcated accrued benefit that would
be eligible for this treatment is a plan that provides for a
participant to apply different distribution elections to different
portions of the accrued benefit so that the amount of the distribution,
with respect to the distribution election applied to its respective
portion of the accrued benefit, is the pro rata portion of the amount
of the distribution that would be determined if that distribution
election had been applied to the entire accrued benefit. An example of
such a plan is a plan that provides both a single-sum option and a
joint and survivor option for the entire benefit, but allows a
participant to select an optional form which is 25 percent of the full
lump sum and 75 percent of the full joint and survivor annuity.
A third type of plan with a bifurcated accrued benefit that would
be eligible for this treatment is a plan that provides a single-sum
distribution option with respect to only a portion of the benefit and
provides a separate benefit election for the remainder of the
distribution. In order to satisfy the requirements to be this type of
plan with a bifurcated accrued benefit, the amount of the distribution
that is not paid in a single sum must be no less than the amount that
would be payable under the rules described in the prior paragraph had a
single sum election been available with respect to the entire accrued
benefit, where the single sum is determined as the present value of the
accrued benefit payable at normal retirement age (or the immediate
annuity if the participant is older than normal retirement age)
determined using the applicable interest rates and the applicable
mortality table. An example of such a plan is a plan that provides that
a participant can elect to receive in a single sum an amount equal to
the employee contributions, accumulated with interest, with the
remainder of the accrued benefit paid under one of the annuity optional
forms of benefit available under the plan in an amount sufficient to
satisfy the requirements under the proposed regulations.
As previously discussed, the proposed regulations would make the
bifurcation of benefits for purposes of section 417(e)(3) conditional
on the existence of plan terms that explicitly provide that, if a
participant selects two different distribution options with respect to
separate portions of the bifurcated accrued benefit, then the two
different distribution options are treated
[[Page 5457]]
as two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
requirements of section 417(e)(3). To provide for such bifurcated
treatment, a plan sponsor would be required to amend its plan to
provide for use of the plan factors that generally apply to annuity
distributions instead of the section 417(e)(3) assumptions in these
circumstances. Any plan amendment must comply with the requirements of
section 411(d)(6). See the discussion in this preamble under the
heading ``Effective/Applicability Date.''
The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that additional
modifications to the regulations under section 417(e)(3) are needed in
light of the enactment of PPA `06. It is expected that additional
proposed amendments to the regulations under section 417(e)(3) will be
issued to reflect statutory changes and to make other clarifications.
Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to be effective on the date of
publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
The changes under the proposed regulations are proposed to apply to
distributions with annuity starting dates in plan years beginning after
the publication date of final regulations. If the regulations are
finalized as proposed and a plan that previously provided for a partial
single-sum distribution together with a specified annuity distribution
is amended to treat that distribution form as a bifurcated accrued
benefit (and applies less favorable actuarial factors to the portion of
the benefit that is not subject to section 417(e)(3)), then the plan
must comply with the requirements of section 411(d)(6). This can be
done by providing that, after the applicable amendment date under Sec.
1.411(d)-3(g)(4), the amount of each portion of a distribution is not
less than the amount that would have been payable under the plan
provisions in effect before the amendment applied to the participant's
accrued benefit as of the applicable amendment date.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rule making is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
the proposed regulation does not impose a collection of information on
small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6)
does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of
proposed rule making has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all
aspects of these proposed regulations. In particular, the Treasury
Department and the IRS request comments regarding whether the special
rules in these proposed regulations regarding bifurcated accrued
benefits should be extended to any types of benefits that are not
covered by the rules in these proposed regulations. All comments will
be available for public inspection or copying at www.regulations.gov or
upon request. A public hearing has been scheduled for June 1, 2012,
beginning at 10 a.m. in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted
beyond the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the
hearing starts. For information about having your name placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written or
electronic comments by May 3, 2012, and an outline of topics to be
discussed and the amount of time to be devoted to each topic (a signed
original and eight (8) copies) by May 11, 2012. A period of 10 minutes
will be allotted to each person for making comments. An agenda showing
the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared after the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the agenda will be available
free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Peter J. Marks and
Linda S.F. Marshall, Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, other personnel from the
IRS and the Treasury Department participated in the development of
these regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.417(e)-1 is amended by:
1. Redesignating paragraph (d)(1) as newly designated paragraph
(d)(1)(i) and revising the heading of the newly designated paragraph
(d)(1)(i).
2. Adding a new paragraph (d)(1)(ii).
3. Revising paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8)(i).
4. Adding a new paragraph (d)(8)(v).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1.417(e)-1 Restrictions and valuations of distributions from
plans subject to sections 401(a)(11) and 417.
* * * * *
(d) Present value requirement--(1) General rule--(i) Defined
benefit plans. * * *
(ii) Defined contribution plans. Because the accrued benefit under
a defined contribution plan equals the account balance, a defined
contribution plan is not subject to the requirements of this paragraph
(d), regardless of whether the requirements of section 401(a)(11) apply
to the plan.
* * * * *
(7) Permitted bifurcation of certain optional forms of benefit--(i)
General rule. A plan with a bifurcated accrued benefit (as described in
paragraph (d)(7)(ii) of this section) is permitted to provide that, if
a participant selects two different distribution options with respect
to separate portions of the bifurcated accrued benefit, then the two
different distribution options are treated as two separate optional
forms of benefit for purposes of applying the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and this paragraph (d). Thus, if this paragraph (d)(7)
applies to treat two separate distribution options selected with
respect to separate portions of a bifurcated accrued benefit as two
separate optional forms of benefit, and
[[Page 5458]]
the exception from the application of paragraph (d) of this section
that is contained in paragraph (d)(6) of this section applies to one of
those optional forms of benefit, then this paragraph (d) applies only
to the optional form of benefit to which the exception under paragraph
(d)(6) of this section does not apply.
(ii) Bifurcated accrued benefit--(A) In general. A plan provides a
bifurcated accrued benefit within the meaning of this paragraph
(d)(7)(ii) if the plan satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(d)(7)(iii) of this section (relating to separately determined
benefits), (d)(7)(iv) of this section (relating to separate
distribution options for proportionate benefits), or (d)(7)(v) of this
section (relating to single sum with separate distribution option for
remainder).
(B) Rules of operation. If a plan provides a bifurcated accrued
benefit within the meaning of this paragraph (d)(7)(ii), and one
portion of the benefits under the plan would itself be a bifurcated
accrued benefit if it were the entire accrued benefit, then the rules
of paragraph (d)(7)(i) of this section may be re-applied to such
portion.
(iii) Separately determined benefits. A plan satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph (d)(7)(iii) if the plan provides for two
separate portions of the accrued benefit that are determined without
regard to any election of optional form of benefit and permits a
participant to select different distribution options with respect to
each of those portions of the accrued benefit.
(iv) Separate elections for proportionate benefits. A plan
satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (d)(7)(iv) if--
(A) The plan provides for a participant to select one distribution
option with respect to a portion of the accrued benefit and a different
distribution option with respect to the remaining portion of the
accrued benefit;
(B) The distribution option selected with respect to each of the
separate portions of the accrued benefit is available with respect to
the entire accrued benefit; and
(C) The amount of the distribution with respect to each
distribution option applied to its respective portion of the accrued
benefit is the pro rata portion of the amount of the distribution that
would be determined if that distribution option had been applied to the
entire accrued benefit.
(v) Single sum with separate election for remainder. A plan
satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (d)(7)(v) if--
(A) The plan provides for a specified amount to be distributed in a
single sum, with the remainder distributed as another distribution
option payable under the plan;
(B) A single-sum distribution is not available with respect to the
participant's entire accrued benefit; and
(C) The amount of the distribution that is not paid in a single sum
is not less than the amount that would be payable if--
(1) A single sum election were available with respect to the entire
accrued benefit, where the single sum is the present value of the
accrued benefit payable at normal retirement age (or the immediate
annuity if the participant is older than normal retirement age)
determined using the applicable interest rates and the applicable
mortality table;
(2) The participant elected to receive the specified amount in a
single sum; and
(3) The rules of paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of this section were applied
to determine the amount of the distribution that is not paid in a
single sum.
(vi) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
paragraph (d)(7). Unless otherwise indicated, these examples are based
on the following assumptions: Each plan is a single-employer defined
benefit plan with a calendar-year plan year, a one-year stability
period coinciding with the calendar year, and a one-month lookback used
for determining the applicable interest rate. The normal retirement age
is 65, and all participant elections are made with proper spousal
consent. In addition, these examples reflect the amendments to sections
417 and 411 that were made in the Pension Protection Act of 2006,
Public Law 109-280, 120 Stat. 780 (2006).
Example 1. (i) Plan B offers a number of optional forms of
payment, including a qualified joint and survivor annuity and a
single-sum payment. The single-sum payment is equal to the present
value of the participant's immediate benefit (but no less than the
present value of the participant's accrued benefit) using the
applicable interest and mortality rates under section 417(e)(3). The
amount of the joint and survivor annuity is determined using plan
factors that are not based on the applicable interest and mortality
rates under section 417(e)(3). Plan B permits a participant to elect
to receive a percentage of the accrued benefit chosen by the
participant as a single sum and the remainder in any annuity form
provided under the plan, with both portions of the payment
determined by multiplying the amount that would be payable if the
entire benefit were paid in that form by the percentage that applies
to that distribution option. Plan B provides that, with respect to a
distribution that is paid partly in the form of a single sum and
partly in the form of an annuity, the single sum and the annuity are
treated as two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of
applying the provisions of the plan implementing the requirements of
section 417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Assume that the December
2012 segment rates are 3.21%, 5.19% and 5.67% for purposes of this
example.
(ii) Participant S retires at age 62 in 2013, with an accrued
benefit of $1,000 per month payable as a straight life annuity at
normal retirement age. Participant S is eligible for an unreduced
early retirement benefit and can therefore collect a straight life
annuity benefit of $1,000 per month beginning immediately.
Alternatively, Participant S can elect to receive the benefit in
other forms, including a single-sum payment of $153,852 (based on
the applicable interest rate and mortality table under section
417(e), which are the 2013 applicable mortality table and the
December 2012 segment rates), or a 100% joint and survivor annuity
of $850 per month (based on the plan's annuity conversion factors).
Participant S elects to receive 25% of the benefit in the form of a
single-sum payment and the balance as a 100% joint and survivor
annuity.
(iii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of this section,
Plan B provides for a bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan B
provides for a participant to select a single-sum distribution with
respect to a portion of the accrued benefit and an annuity
distribution option with respect to the remaining portion of the
accrued benefit. Each distribution option is available with respect
to the entire accrued benefit, and the amount of the distribution
with respect to each distribution option applied to its respective
portion of the accrued benefit is the pro rata portion of the amount
of the distribution that would be determined if that distribution
option had been applied to the entire accrued benefit. Furthermore,
Plan B provides that the two different distribution options selected
with respect to each of those portions of the accrued benefit are
treated as two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of
applying the provisions of Plan B implementing the requirements of
section 417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Accordingly, Participant
S receives a single sum payment equal to 25% of the full single sum
amount, or $38,463. In addition, Participant S receives a 100% joint
and survivor annuity in the amount of $637.50 per month, equal to
75% of the full joint and survivor benefit of $850 per month
otherwise payable. The joint and survivor benefit is not subject to
the minimum present value requirements of section 417(e)(3) because
it is treated as a separate optional form of benefit under paragraph
(d)(7)(i) of this section.
Example 2. (i) Plan C permits participants to elect a partial
single sum equal to employee contributions, accumulated with
interest. Any other amounts must be paid in the form of an annuity.
Under the terms of Plan C, if a participant elects to receive this
partial single sum, the annuity benefit payable to the participant
is at least as great as the minimum amount determined pursuant to
paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this section. Plan C provides that, with
respect to a distribution that is paid partly in the form
[[Page 5459]]
of a single sum and partly in the form of an annuity, the single sum
and the annuity are treated as two separate optional forms of
benefit for purposes of applying the provisions of the plan
implementing the requirements of section 417(e)(3) and Sec.
1.417(e)-1(d). Participant T retires at age 60 in 2013 with an
accrued benefit of $1,500 per month payable as a straight life
annuity payable at normal retirement age. Based on the plan's early
retirement and optional form factors (which are not based on the
applicable interest and mortality rates under section 417(e)(3)),
Participant T's benefit commencing at age 60 in the form of a 10-
year certain and continuous annuity would be $925 per month.
Participant T elects to receive a single sum payment of $32,000
equal to T's accumulated contributions with interest, and the
remainder as a 10-year certain and continuous annuity. Assume that
the December 2012 segment rates are the same as those assumed in
Example 1. Based on the applicable mortality table for 2013 and the
December 2012 segment rates, the deferred annuity factor at age 60
for lifetime payments commencing at age 65 is 8.769.
(ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(v) of this section,
Plan C provides for a bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan C
provides for a specified amount to be distributed in a single sum,
with the remainder distributed as another distribution option
payable under the plan, a single-sum distribution is not available
with respect to a participant's entire accrued benefit, and the
amount of the distribution that is not paid in a single sum meets
the requirements of paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this section.
Furthermore, Plan C provides that, with respect to a distribution
that is paid partly in the form of a single sum and partly in the
form of an annuity, the single sum and the annuity are treated as
two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Accordingly, the rule for
proportional benefits under paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of this section is
applied to determine the minimum amount of Participant T's annuity
as if a single sum payment were available, equal to the present
value of T's full accrued benefit. If Plan C had offered a single
sum payment option with respect to Participant T's full accrued
benefit of $1,500 per month, the minimum present value based on the
applicable mortality table for 2013 and the assumed December 2012
segment rates would have been $1,500 x 12 x the deferred annuity
factor of 8.769, or $157,842. The single sum payment actually
available to Participant T under the provisions of Plan C is the
amount of accumulated contributions with interest, or $32,000 which
represents 20.27% of the single sum value of Participant T's full
accrued benefit ($32,000 / $157,842 = 20.27%).
(iii) Therefore, the portion of T's accrued benefit not payable
as a single sum must be at least as great as the amount based on the
remaining 79.73% of T's benefit multiplied by the accrued benefit of
$1,500 per month, or $1,195.95 per month payable at normal
retirement age. Based on Plan C's early retirement and optional form
factors, the annuity benefit payable to Participant T in the form of
a 10-year certain and continuous annuity beginning at age 60 cannot
be less than $925 times 79.73% or $737.50 per month. Participant T
receives this in addition to the single sum payment of $32,000. The
10-year certain and continuous benefit is not subject to the minimum
present value requirements of section 417(e)(3) because it is
treated as a separate optional form of benefit under paragraph
(d)(7)(i) of this section.
Example 3. (i) Plan D permits participants to elect a single-sum
payment of up to $10,000 with the remaining benefit payable in the
form of an annuity. Under the terms of Plan D, if a participant
elects to receive this partial single sum, the annuity benefit
payable to the participant is at least as great as the minimum
amount determined pursuant to paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this
section. Plan D provides that, with respect to a distribution that
is paid partly in the form of a single sum and partly in the form of
an annuity, the single sum and the annuity are treated as two
separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of the plan implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Participant W retires in 2013 at
age 55 with an accrued benefit of $1,000 per month payable at normal
retirement age. Participant W is eligible for an unreduced early
retirement benefit of $1,000 per month payable as a straight life
annuity. Alternatively, based on Plan D's definition of actuarial
equivalence (which is not based on the applicable interest and
mortality rates under section 417(e)(3)), Participant W can receive
an immediate benefit in the form of a 100% joint-and-survivor
annuity of $800 per month. Participant W elects to receive a single
sum payment of $10,000, with the balance of the benefit payable as a
100% joint-and-survivor annuity beginning at age 55. Assume that the
December 2012 segment rates are the same as those assumed in Example
1. Based on the applicable mortality table for 2013 and the December
2012 segment rates, the deferred annuity factor at age 55 for
lifetime payments commencing at age 65 is 6.558.
(ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(v) of this section,
Plan D provides for a bifurcated accrued benefit because Plan D
provides for a specified amount to be distributed in a single sum,
with the remainder distributed as another distribution option
payable under the plan, a single-sum distribution is not available
with respect to a participant's entire accrued benefit, and the
amount of the distribution that is not paid in a single sum meets
the requirements of paragraph (d)(7)(v)(C) of this section.
Furthermore, Plan D provides that, with respect to a
distribution that is paid partly in the form of a single sum and
partly in the form of an annuity, the single sum and the annuity are
treated as two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of
applying the provisions of the plan implementing the requirements of
section 417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Accordingly, the rule for
proportional benefits under paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of this section is
applied to determine the minimum amount of Participant W's annuity
as if a single sum payment were available, equal to the present
value of W's full accrued benefit.
(iii) If Plan D had offered a single sum payment option with
respect to Participant W's full accrued benefit of $1,000 per month,
the minimum present value based on the applicable mortality table
for 2013 and the assumed December 2012 segment rates would have been
$1,000 x 12 x the deferred annuity factor of 6.558, or $78,696. The
single sum payment actually available to Participant W under the
provisions of Plan D is $10,000, which represents 12.71% of the
single sum value of W's full accrued benefit ($10,000 / $78,696 =
12.71%).
(iv) Therefore, the portion of Participant W's accrued benefit
not payable as a single sum must be at least as great as the amount
based on the remaining 87.29% of W's benefit multiplied by the
accrued benefit of $1,000 per month, or $872.90 per month payable at
normal retirement age. Based on Plan D's early retirement and
optional form factors, the annuity benefit payable to Participant W
in the form of a 100% joint-and-survivor annuity beginning at age 55
is no less than 87.29% x $800, or $698.32 per month. Participant W
receives this in addition to the single sum payment of $10,000. The
joint and survivor annuity benefit is not subject to the minimum
present value requirements of section 417(e)(3) because it is
treated as a separate optional form of benefit under paragraph
(d)(7)(i) of this section.
Example 4. (i) Plan E was amended to freeze benefits under the
traditional plan formula as of December 31, 2012, and to provide
benefits under a cash balance formula beginning January 1, 2013. The
plan provides that participants may elect separate distribution
options for the portion of the benefit accrued under the traditional
formula as of December 31, 2012, and the portion of the benefit
earned under the cash balance formula. Furthermore, the plan
provides that a participant may elect to receive a single-sum
payment only with respect to the portion of the benefit earned under
the cash balance formula. Plan E provides that the two distribution
options selected with respect to the portion of the benefit accrued
under the traditional formula as of December 31, 2012, and the
portion of the benefit earned under the cash balance formula are
treated as two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of
applying the provisions of Plan E implementing the requirements of
section 417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d).
(ii) In accordance with paragraph (d)(7)(iii) of this section,
Plan E provides for a bifurcated accrued benefit because the portion
of the accrued benefit determined under the traditional formula and
the portion of the accrued benefit determined under the cash balance
formula are determined separately without regard to any election of
optional form of benefit and Plan E permits a participant to select
different distribution options with respect to both of those
portions of the accrued benefit. Furthermore, as permitted by
paragraph (d)(7)(i) of this section, Plan E provides that the two
different distribution options selected with
[[Page 5460]]
respect to each of those portions of the accrued benefit are treated
as two separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of applying
the provisions of Plan E implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Therefore, whether a participant
elects to receive a single sum payment of the portion of the benefit
earned under the cash balance formula does not affect whether the
distribution elected with respect to the portion of the benefit
earned as of December 31, 2012, is subject to the minimum present
value requirements of section 417(e)(3).
Example 5. (i) The facts are the same as in Example 4, except
that Plan E also permits a participant to elect, with respect to the
cash balance portion of the benefit, to receive a percentage of the
accrued benefit chosen by the participant as a single sum and the
remainder in any annuity form provided under the plan, with both
portions of the payment determined by multiplying the amount that
would be payable if the entire benefit were paid in that form by the
percentage that applies to that distribution option. Plan E provides
that, with respect to such a distribution that is paid partly in the
form of a single sum and partly in the form of an annuity, the
single sum and the annuity are treated as two separate optional
forms of benefit for purposes of applying the provisions of the plan
implementing the requirements of section 417(e)(3) and Sec.
1.417(e)-1(d). Participant X retires at age 65, with an accrued
benefit under the traditional formula of $500 per month (earned as
of December 31, 2012), and a cash balance hypothetical account of
$45,000. Based on Plan E's actuarial equivalence factors,
Participant X's accrued benefit derived from the cash balance
hypothetical account is $320 per month, payable as a life annuity at
normal retirement. Participant V elects to receive $15,000 of the
current hypothetical account balance in the form of a single sum and
to receive the remainder of the total accrued benefit as a life
annuity.
(ii) Under the analysis set forth in Example 4, Plan E provides
for a bifurcated accrued benefit in accordance with paragraph
(d)(7)(C) of this section with respect to the portion of the accrued
benefit attributable to the benefit accrued as of December 31, 2012,
and the portion of the accrued benefit attributable to the benefit
earned under the cash balance formula. Furthermore, Plan E provides
that the two different distribution options selected with respect to
each of those portions of the accrued benefit are treated as two
separate optional forms of benefit for purposes of applying the
provisions of Plan E implementing the requirements of section
417(e)(3) and Sec. 1.417(e)-1(d). Thus, a separate distribution
option may be chosen for each of these two portions, and section
417(e)(3) applies separately to each portion.
(iii) In accordance with paragraphs (d)(7)(ii)(B) and (d)(7)(iv)
of this section, the portion of the accrued benefit under Plan E
earned under the cash balance formula is also a bifurcated accrued
benefit because Plan E provides for a participant to select a
single-sum distribution with respect to a portion of the cash
balance formula accrued benefit and an annuity distribution option
with respect to the remaining portion of the cash balance formula
accrued benefit, each distribution option is available with respect
to the entire cash balance formula accrued benefit, and the amount
of the distribution with respect to each distribution option applied
to its respective portion of the cash balance formula accrued
benefit is the pro rata portion of the amount of the distribution
that would be determined if that distribution option had been
applied to the entire cash balance formula accrued benefit.
Furthermore, Plan E provides that the two different distribution
options selected with respect to each of those portions of the cash
balance formula accrued benefit are treated as two separate optional
forms of benefit for purposes of applying the provisions of Plan E
implementing the requirements of section 417(e)(3) and Sec.
1.417(e)-1(d). Thus, under paragraph (d)(7)(iv) of this section, \1/
3\ of the cash balance hypothetical account is paid as a single sum
(that is, $15,000 / $45,000), and the remaining \2/3\ of the cash
balance hypothetical account, or $30,000, is converted to an annuity
benefit of \2/3\ x $320, or $213.33 per month.
(iv) Participant X therefore receives a single sum payment of
$15,000, representing the portion of the current hypothetical
account balance that X elected to receive as a single sum. In
addition, Participant X receives a monthly life annuity of $713.33
per month (equal to the $500 benefit attributable to the benefit
earned as of December 31, 2012, plus the $213.33 portion of the cash
balance benefit paid as an annuity). Participant X's election to
receive a single sum payment of part of the benefit earned under the
cash balance formula does not affect whether the remainder of
Participant X's distribution is subject to the minimum present value
requirements of section 417(e)(3).
(8) Effective/applicability date--(i) In general. Except as
otherwise provided in this paragraph (d)(8), this paragraph (d) applies
to distributions with annuity starting dates in plan years beginning on
or after January 1, 1995.
* * * * *
(v) Paragraph (d)(7) of this section applies to distributions with
annuity starting dates in plan years beginning on or after the date
final regulations that finalize these proposed regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012-2341 Filed 2-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P