Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, 4468-4469 [2012-1897]
Download as PDF
4468
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Approved: January 16, 2012.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate, General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
Dated: January 23, 2012.
J.M. Beal,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–1900 Filed 1–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the Navy
(DoN) is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has determined that USS
ARLINGTON (LPD 24) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with certain provisions of the 72
COLREGS without interfering with its
special function as a naval ship. The
intended effect of this rule is to warn
mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS
apply.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective January 30,
2012 and is applicable beginning
January 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Jaewon Choi, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty
and Maritime Law), Office of the Judge
Advocate General, Department of the
Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave. SE., Suite
3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone (202) 685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24) is a vessel
of the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Rule 27(a)(i) and (b)(i),
pertaining to the placement of all-round
task lights in a vertical line; Annex I,
paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the
horizontal distance between the forward
and after masthead lights; and Annex I,
paragraph 2(k) as described in Rule
30(a)(i), pertaining to the vertical
separation between anchor lights. The
DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has also certified that the lights
involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72
COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
DATES:
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the CFR as follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended as
follows:
■ A. In Table Three by adding, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, an
entry for USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24);
and
■ B. In Table Four by adding, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, and
entry for USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24);
and
■ C. In Table Five by adding, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, and
entry for USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24).
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE THREE
Vessel
Stern light arc
of visibility;
rule 21(c)
Side lights distance inboard
of ship’s sides
in meters 3(b)
Annex 1
Stern light,
distance forward of stern
in meters; rule
21(c)
Forward anchor light,
height above
hull in meters;
2(k) Annex 1
Anchor lights
relationship of
aft light to forward light in
meters 2(k)
Annex 1
*
........................ ........................
*
........................
*
........................
*
........................
*
........................
1.62 below
No.
*
USS ARLINGTON ...............
*
LPD 24 .........
*
*
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Side lights arc
of visibility;
rule 21(b)
Masthead
lights arc of
visibility; rule
21(a)
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13:14 Jan 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
*
4469
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE FOUR
Vessel
Number
Angle in degrees of task
lights off vertical as
viewed from directly
ahead or astern
*
*
*
USS ARLINGTON ...............................................................
*
*
*
LPD 24 ...............................................................................
10
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE FIVE
Vessel
Masthead
lights not over
all other lights
and obstructions. Annex I,
sec. 2(f)
No.
*
*
*
*
USS ARLINGTON ................................................ LPD 24 ..........................
*
*
*
Approved: January 16, 2012.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate, General, Admiralty
and Maritime Law.
Dated: January 23, 2012.
J.M. Beal,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–1897 Filed 1–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
RIN 2900–AN28
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as a final rule the
proposal to amend its adjudication
regulations regarding service connection
of dental conditions for treatment
purposes. This amendment clarifies that
principles governing determinations by
VA’s Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) for service connection of dental
conditions for the purpose of
establishing eligibility for dental
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
13:14 Jan 27, 2012
*
treatment by VA’s Veterans Health
Administration (VHA), apply only when
VHA requests information or a rating
from VBA for those purposes. This
amendment also clarifies existing
regulatory provisions and reflects the
respective responsibilities of VHA and
VBA in determinations concerning
eligibility for dental treatment.
Effective Date: This amendment
is effective February 29, 2012.
DATES:
In a
document published in the Federal
Register on March 17, 2011 (76 FR
14600), VA proposed to amend 38 CFR
3.381, which identifies some of the
circumstances under which dental
conditions that may not qualify as
disabilities for purposes of VA disability
compensation may nevertheless be
service connected for purposes of VA
dental treatment under 38 U.S.C. 1712
and 38 CFR 17.161; clarifies existing
regulatory provisions; and reflects the
respective responsibilities of VHA and
VBA in determinations concerning
eligibility for dental treatment. We
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dental Conditions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Arlene George, M.D., MPH, Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation Service,
Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–9700. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
38 CFR Part 3
ACTION:
*
........................ ........................
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Forward masthead light not
in forward
quarter of
ship. Annex I,
sec. 3(a)
Sfmt 4700
After masthead light less
than 1⁄2 ship’s
length aft of
forward masthead light.
Annex I, sec.
3(a)
*
Percentage
horizontal
separation
attained
*
X
*
71
*
proposed redesignation of paragraphs
(a) through (f) as paragraphs (b) through
(g) and the addition of new paragraph
(a) that explains the situations when
VHA will refer a claim to VBA. We also
proposed to amend redesignated
paragraph (b) to clarify what conditions
will be service connected for treatment
purposes. Additionally, we proposed
removal of the following sentence from
redesignated paragraph (c): ‘‘When
applicable, the rating activity will
determine whether the condition is due
to combat or other in-service trauma, or
whether the Veteran was interned as a
prisoner of war.’’ This sentence is being
removed because it is repetitive of
portions of paragraph (a).
Interested persons were invited to
submit written comments to VA on or
before May 16, 2011. In response to the
proposed rule, VA received four (4)
public comments. Of these comments,
two were beyond the scope of the
rulemaking: One involved
comprehensive dental care for children
of Vietnam veterans born with spina
bifida and the other suggested revision
of the criteria for service personnel to
obtain dental care. Therefore, no
changes were made based on these
comments.
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4468-4469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) is amending its
certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the
Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and Maritime
Law) has determined that USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24) is a vessel of the Navy
which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply
with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its
special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this rule is
to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective January 30, 2012 and is applicable
beginning January 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Jaewon Choi, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of the
Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave.
SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5066, telephone (202)
685-5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33
U.S.C. 1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that the DAJAG (Admiralty and
Maritime Law), under authority delegated by the Secretary of the Navy,
has certified that USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24) is a vessel of the Navy
which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply
with the following specific provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a naval ship: Rule 27(a)(i)
and (b)(i), pertaining to the placement of all-round task lights in a
vertical line; Annex I, paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the horizontal
distance between the forward and after masthead lights; and Annex I,
paragraph 2(k) as described in Rule 30(a)(i), pertaining to the
vertical separation between anchor lights. The DAJAG (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has also certified that the lights involved are located
in closest possible compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS
requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR parts
296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment
prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public
interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of
lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its
military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 706 of title
32 of the CFR as follows:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for part 706 continues to read:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
0
2. Section 706.2 is amended as follows:
0
A. In Table Three by adding, in alpha numerical order, by vessel
number, an entry for USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24); and
0
B. In Table Four by adding, in alpha numerical order, by vessel number,
and entry for USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24); and
0
C. In Table Five by adding, in alpha numerical order, by vessel number,
and entry for USS ARLINGTON (LPD 24).
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
Table Three
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Side lights Stern light,
Masthead Side lights Stern light distance distance Forward anchor Anchor lights relationship
lights arc of arc of arc of inboard of forward of light, height of aft light to forward
Vessel No. visibility; visibility; visibility; ship's sides stern in above hull in light in meters 2(k) Annex
rule 21(a) rule 21(b) rule 21(c) in meters 3(b) meters; rule meters; 2(k) 1
Annex 1 21(c) Annex 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS ARLINGTON.......................... LPD 24.................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 1.62 below
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[[Page 4469]]
Table Four
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Angle in degrees of task
lights off vertical as
Vessel Number viewed from directly
ahead or astern
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS ARLINGTON................ LPD 24......... 10
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Table Five
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After mast-
Masthead Forward head light less
lights not masthead light than \1/2\ Percentage
over all other not in forward ship's length horizontal
Vessel No. lights and quarter of aft of forward separation
obstructions. ship. Annex I, masthead light. attained
Annex I, sec. sec. 3(a) Annex I, sec.
2(f) 3(a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS ARLINGTON................ LPD 24......... .............. .............. X 71
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved: January 16, 2012.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate, General,
Admiralty and Maritime Law.
Dated: January 23, 2012.
J.M. Beal,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-1897 Filed 1-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P