Dental Conditions, 4469-4471 [2012-1873]
Download as PDF
4469
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE FOUR
Vessel
Number
Angle in degrees of task
lights off vertical as
viewed from directly
ahead or astern
*
*
*
USS ARLINGTON ...............................................................
*
*
*
LPD 24 ...............................................................................
10
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE FIVE
Vessel
Masthead
lights not over
all other lights
and obstructions. Annex I,
sec. 2(f)
No.
*
*
*
*
USS ARLINGTON ................................................ LPD 24 ..........................
*
*
*
Approved: January 16, 2012.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate, General, Admiralty
and Maritime Law.
Dated: January 23, 2012.
J.M. Beal,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–1897 Filed 1–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
RIN 2900–AN28
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as a final rule the
proposal to amend its adjudication
regulations regarding service connection
of dental conditions for treatment
purposes. This amendment clarifies that
principles governing determinations by
VA’s Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) for service connection of dental
conditions for the purpose of
establishing eligibility for dental
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
13:14 Jan 27, 2012
*
treatment by VA’s Veterans Health
Administration (VHA), apply only when
VHA requests information or a rating
from VBA for those purposes. This
amendment also clarifies existing
regulatory provisions and reflects the
respective responsibilities of VHA and
VBA in determinations concerning
eligibility for dental treatment.
Effective Date: This amendment
is effective February 29, 2012.
DATES:
In a
document published in the Federal
Register on March 17, 2011 (76 FR
14600), VA proposed to amend 38 CFR
3.381, which identifies some of the
circumstances under which dental
conditions that may not qualify as
disabilities for purposes of VA disability
compensation may nevertheless be
service connected for purposes of VA
dental treatment under 38 U.S.C. 1712
and 38 CFR 17.161; clarifies existing
regulatory provisions; and reflects the
respective responsibilities of VHA and
VBA in determinations concerning
eligibility for dental treatment. We
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dental Conditions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Arlene George, M.D., MPH, Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation Service,
Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–9700. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
38 CFR Part 3
ACTION:
*
........................ ........................
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Forward masthead light not
in forward
quarter of
ship. Annex I,
sec. 3(a)
Sfmt 4700
After masthead light less
than 1⁄2 ship’s
length aft of
forward masthead light.
Annex I, sec.
3(a)
*
Percentage
horizontal
separation
attained
*
X
*
71
*
proposed redesignation of paragraphs
(a) through (f) as paragraphs (b) through
(g) and the addition of new paragraph
(a) that explains the situations when
VHA will refer a claim to VBA. We also
proposed to amend redesignated
paragraph (b) to clarify what conditions
will be service connected for treatment
purposes. Additionally, we proposed
removal of the following sentence from
redesignated paragraph (c): ‘‘When
applicable, the rating activity will
determine whether the condition is due
to combat or other in-service trauma, or
whether the Veteran was interned as a
prisoner of war.’’ This sentence is being
removed because it is repetitive of
portions of paragraph (a).
Interested persons were invited to
submit written comments to VA on or
before May 16, 2011. In response to the
proposed rule, VA received four (4)
public comments. Of these comments,
two were beyond the scope of the
rulemaking: One involved
comprehensive dental care for children
of Vietnam veterans born with spina
bifida and the other suggested revision
of the criteria for service personnel to
obtain dental care. Therefore, no
changes were made based on these
comments.
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
4470
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Of the two remaining comments, one
was two-fold. The commenter expressed
concerns about the procedure for timely
processing Class 5 rating requests; this
is beyond the scope of this rulemaking,
which addresses only the circumstances
under which VBA will make
adjudicatory determinations needed by
VHA to determine eligibility for dental
care. The commenter also suggested that
the language of the proposed rule
pertaining to Class 6 eligibility is ‘‘vague
and open to broader interpretation than
the examples provided.’’ This comment
also exceeds the scope of this
rulemaking. In providing background
information on the various
circumstances in which VHA provides
dental care to veterans, the preamble to
the proposed rule notice referred to
veterans ‘‘[w]ho are scheduled for
admission or otherwise receiving care
under 38 U.S.C. chapter 17 if dental care
is reasonably necessary to the provision
of such care and services’’ and listed as
‘‘examples’’ several types of surgery for
which dental care may be necessary to
minimize the risk of complications due
to infection from dental conditions. The
examples provided are not intended to
be an exhaustive list, but rather merely
examples of medical conditions
commonly associated with greater
health risks when combined with poor
dentition. The preamble language is
reflective of 38 CFR 17.161, which sets
forth the criteria concerning eligibility
for treatment and which we did not
propose to revise. To the extent the
commenter suggests that we revise such
criteria, the comment is beyond the
scope of this rulemaking. No changes
were made based on this comment.
The fourth commenter suggested VA
broaden the scope of the determinations
listed in the proposed rule for greater
consistency with 38 U.S.C 1712 and 38
CFR 17.161(i) and (j). The intent of the
proposed rule is not to reiterate all
potential bases for eligibility for dental
treatment listed in 38 U.S.C
1712(a)(1)(A)–(H) and 38 CFR 17.161(i)
and (j), but to clarify VBA’s role in
making determinations on such matters.
Further, the phrase ‘‘include, but is not
limited to’’ indicates that the matters
listed were intended as examples rather
than an exclusive list. Thus, the matters
referenced in 38 U.S.C 1712 and 38 CFR
17.161(i) and (j) are not excluded.
Therefore, no changes were made based
on this comment.
Based on the rationale set forth in the
preamble to the proposed rule and in
this preamble, VA is adopting the
proposed rule as a final rule without
changes.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:14 Jan 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule
would not affect any small entities.
Only certain VA beneficiaries could be
directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined and it has been determined
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
year. This final rule will have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are 64.011, Veterans Dental
Care; and 64.109, Veterans
Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on December 6, 2011, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive
materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Dated: January 24, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 3 as
follows:
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart A continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless
otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 3.381 by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a)
through (f) as paragraphs (b) through (g).
■ b. Adding new paragraph (a).
■ c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b).
■ d. Removing the last sentence from
newly redesignated paragraph (c).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
■
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
§ 3.381 Service connection of dental
conditions for treatment purposes.
(a) The Veterans Benefits
Administration (VBA) will adjudicate a
claim for service connection of a dental
condition for treatment purposes after
the Veterans Health Administration
determines a veteran meets the basic
eligibility requirements of § 17.161 of
this chapter and requests VBA make a
determination on questions that
include, but are not limited to, any of
the following:
(1) Former Prisoner of War status;
(2) Whether the veteran has a
compensable or noncompensable
service-connected dental condition or
disability;
(3) Whether the dental condition or
disability is a result of combat wounds;
(4) Whether the dental condition or
disability is a result of service trauma;
or
(5) Whether the veteran is totally
disabled due to a service-connected
disability.
(b) Treatable carious teeth,
replaceable missing teeth, dental or
alveolar abscesses, and periodontal
disease are not compensable disabilities,
but may nevertheless be service
connected solely for the purpose of
establishing eligibility for outpatient
dental treatment as provided for in
§ 17.161 of this chapter. These
conditions and other dental conditions
or disabilities that are noncompensably
rated under § 4.150 of this chapter may
be service connected for purposes of
Class II or Class II (a) dental treatment
under § 17.161 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–1873 Filed 1–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 39
RIN 2900–AN90
Tribal Veterans Cemetery Grants
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
regulations governing Federal grants for
the establishment, expansion, and
improvement of veterans cemeteries.
This final rule implements through
regulation new statutory authority to
provide grants for the establishment,
expansion, and improvement of Tribal
Organization veterans cemeteries, as
authorized by Section 403 of the
‘‘Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:14 Jan 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
Information Technology Act of 2006’’
(the Act). The Act requires VA to
administer grants to Tribal
Organizations in the same manner and
under the same conditions as grants to
States. This final rule makes nonsubstantive changes to the part heading
of Part 39 and the name of the State
Cemetery Grants Service to more
accurately reflect that VA awards
veteran cemetery grants to States and
Tribal Organizations. The final rule
establishes criteria to guide VA’s
decisions on granting Tribal
Organization requests to obtain grants
for establishing, expanding, and
improving veterans cemeteries that are
or will be owned and operated by a
Tribal Organization. The final rule also
expands VA’s preapplication
requirement to all veterans cemetery
grants as a means to promote
consistency and communication in the
grant application process. Further, the
final rule revises VA regulations to
address structural differences between
Tribal Organizations and States.
DATES: Effective Date: February 29,
2012. The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the rule
was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register as of July 16, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Frank Salvas, Director of
Veterans Cemetery Grants Service,
National Cemetery Administration
(41E), Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20420. Telephone: (202) 249–7396
(this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
19, 2011, VA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (76 FR 28925), that proposed to
amend regulations in 38 CFR part 39
governing Federal grants for the
establishment, expansion, and
improvement of veterans cemeteries and
to implement through regulation new
statutory authority to award grants to
Tribal Organizations in the same
manner and under the same conditions
as awarded to States, as authorized by
the Act (Pub. L. 109–461), enacted
December 22, 2006. VA provided a 60day comment period for the proposed
rule that ended on July 18, 2011.
We received one comment which
supported providing cemetery grants to
Tribal Organizations in the same
manner VA currently provides grants to
States. The comment indicated that the
process for Tribal Organizations to
qualify for a grant should be no different
than the process that States are
currently required to follow. No change
is required in the final rule to address
this comment. As specified in the Act,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4471
grants to Tribal Organizations ‘‘shall be
made in the same manner, and under
the same conditions, as grants to
States.’’ Public Law 109–461, § 403.
Accordingly, Tribal Organization grants
will be awarded in the same manner as
VA currently provides grants to the
States. The final rule adheres as closely
as possible to the procedures and
requirements for States to apply for
cemetery grants. The final rule does not
change the existing grant prioritization
process and retains the same four
priority groups as the current Part 39.
Thus, in accordance with 38 U.S.C.
2408, Tribal Organizations will compete
with States in the prioritization process.
We note that since the publication of the
proposed rule, the Veterans Cemetery
Grants Service (VCGS) has awarded its
first Veterans cemetery grant to a Tribal
Organization for the establishment of a
Tribal veterans cemetery.
Based on the rationale set forth in the
proposed rule, and upon consideration
of the public comment submission, we
adopt the provisions of the proposed
rule as a final rule, with minor nonsubstantive edits to the rule text to
accurately reflect the wording and
punctuation in the current 38 CFR part
39.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
E:\FR\FM\30JAR1.SGM
30JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4469-4471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1873]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AN28
Dental Conditions
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adopts as a final rule
the proposal to amend its adjudication regulations regarding service
connection of dental conditions for treatment purposes. This amendment
clarifies that principles governing determinations by VA's Veterans
Benefits Administration (VBA) for service connection of dental
conditions for the purpose of establishing eligibility for dental
treatment by VA's Veterans Health Administration (VHA), apply only when
VHA requests information or a rating from VBA for those purposes. This
amendment also clarifies existing regulatory provisions and reflects
the respective responsibilities of VHA and VBA in determinations
concerning eligibility for dental treatment.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment is effective February 29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arlene George, M.D., MPH, Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation Service, Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461-9700. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a document published in the Federal
Register on March 17, 2011 (76 FR 14600), VA proposed to amend 38 CFR
3.381, which identifies some of the circumstances under which dental
conditions that may not qualify as disabilities for purposes of VA
disability compensation may nevertheless be service connected for
purposes of VA dental treatment under 38 U.S.C. 1712 and 38 CFR 17.161;
clarifies existing regulatory provisions; and reflects the respective
responsibilities of VHA and VBA in determinations concerning
eligibility for dental treatment. We proposed redesignation of
paragraphs (a) through (f) as paragraphs (b) through (g) and the
addition of new paragraph (a) that explains the situations when VHA
will refer a claim to VBA. We also proposed to amend redesignated
paragraph (b) to clarify what conditions will be service connected for
treatment purposes. Additionally, we proposed removal of the following
sentence from redesignated paragraph (c): ``When applicable, the rating
activity will determine whether the condition is due to combat or other
in-service trauma, or whether the Veteran was interned as a prisoner of
war.'' This sentence is being removed because it is repetitive of
portions of paragraph (a).
Interested persons were invited to submit written comments to VA on
or before May 16, 2011. In response to the proposed rule, VA received
four (4) public comments. Of these comments, two were beyond the scope
of the rulemaking: One involved comprehensive dental care for children
of Vietnam veterans born with spina bifida and the other suggested
revision of the criteria for service personnel to obtain dental care.
Therefore, no changes were made based on these comments.
[[Page 4470]]
Of the two remaining comments, one was two-fold. The commenter
expressed concerns about the procedure for timely processing Class 5
rating requests; this is beyond the scope of this rulemaking, which
addresses only the circumstances under which VBA will make adjudicatory
determinations needed by VHA to determine eligibility for dental care.
The commenter also suggested that the language of the proposed rule
pertaining to Class 6 eligibility is ``vague and open to broader
interpretation than the examples provided.'' This comment also exceeds
the scope of this rulemaking. In providing background information on
the various circumstances in which VHA provides dental care to
veterans, the preamble to the proposed rule notice referred to veterans
``[w]ho are scheduled for admission or otherwise receiving care under
38 U.S.C. chapter 17 if dental care is reasonably necessary to the
provision of such care and services'' and listed as ``examples''
several types of surgery for which dental care may be necessary to
minimize the risk of complications due to infection from dental
conditions. The examples provided are not intended to be an exhaustive
list, but rather merely examples of medical conditions commonly
associated with greater health risks when combined with poor dentition.
The preamble language is reflective of 38 CFR 17.161, which sets forth
the criteria concerning eligibility for treatment and which we did not
propose to revise. To the extent the commenter suggests that we revise
such criteria, the comment is beyond the scope of this rulemaking. No
changes were made based on this comment.
The fourth commenter suggested VA broaden the scope of the
determinations listed in the proposed rule for greater consistency with
38 U.S.C 1712 and 38 CFR 17.161(i) and (j). The intent of the proposed
rule is not to reiterate all potential bases for eligibility for dental
treatment listed in 38 U.S.C 1712(a)(1)(A)-(H) and 38 CFR 17.161(i) and
(j), but to clarify VBA's role in making determinations on such
matters. Further, the phrase ``include, but is not limited to''
indicates that the matters listed were intended as examples rather than
an exclusive list. Thus, the matters referenced in 38 U.S.C 1712 and 38
CFR 17.161(i) and (j) are not excluded. Therefore, no changes were made
based on this comment.
Based on the rationale set forth in the preamble to the proposed
rule and in this preamble, VA is adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule without changes.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This final rule would not affect any small entities. Only certain
VA beneficiaries could be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) classifies a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are 64.011, Veterans Dental Care; and 64.109,
Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected Disability.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on December 6, 2011, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Dated: January 24, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 3 as
follows:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 3.381 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a) through (f) as paragraphs (b) through
(g).
0
b. Adding new paragraph (a).
0
c. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b).
0
d. Removing the last sentence from newly redesignated paragraph (c).
The addition and revision read as follows:
[[Page 4471]]
Sec. 3.381 Service connection of dental conditions for treatment
purposes.
(a) The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) will adjudicate a
claim for service connection of a dental condition for treatment
purposes after the Veterans Health Administration determines a veteran
meets the basic eligibility requirements of Sec. 17.161 of this
chapter and requests VBA make a determination on questions that
include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
(1) Former Prisoner of War status;
(2) Whether the veteran has a compensable or noncompensable
service-connected dental condition or disability;
(3) Whether the dental condition or disability is a result of
combat wounds;
(4) Whether the dental condition or disability is a result of
service trauma; or
(5) Whether the veteran is totally disabled due to a service-
connected disability.
(b) Treatable carious teeth, replaceable missing teeth, dental or
alveolar abscesses, and periodontal disease are not compensable
disabilities, but may nevertheless be service connected solely for the
purpose of establishing eligibility for outpatient dental treatment as
provided for in Sec. 17.161 of this chapter. These conditions and
other dental conditions or disabilities that are noncompensably rated
under Sec. 4.150 of this chapter may be service connected for purposes
of Class II or Class II (a) dental treatment under Sec. 17.161 of this
chapter.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-1873 Filed 1-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P