Advisory Committee Management, 4238-4239 [2012-1851]

Download as PDF 4238 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations (2) Distributions by retail distributors that may not include face-to-face transactions to the extent that such distributions are consistent with the activities authorized for a retail distributor as specified in the definition of retail distributor in § 1300.02 of this chapter, except that this paragraph (a)(2) does not apply to sales of scheduled listed chemical products at retail. * * * * * (5) The net weight of each listed chemical given in kilograms or parts thereof; * * * * * (11) The name, address, business, telephone number, and, where available, the facsimile number of the importer, transferor, or transshipper; * * * * * ■ 39. In § 1313.32, paragraph (b)(2) is revised to read as follows: § 1313.32 Requirement of authorization for international transactions. * * * * * (b) * * * (2) A copy of the DEA Form 486 may be transmitted directly to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Import/ Export Unit, through electronic facsimile media not later than 15 days prior to the exportation. * * * * * ■ 40. In § 1313.33, paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(4) are revised to read as follows: * * * * * (c) * * * (1) The name, address, telephone number, and, where available, the facsimile number of the chemical exporter; the name, address, telephone number, and, where available, the facsimile number of the chemical importer; * * * * * (4) The name, address, telephone number, and, where available, the facsimile number of the consignee in the country where the chemical shipment is destined; the name(s) and address(es) of any intermediate consignee(s). PART 1314—RETAIL SALE OF SCHEDULED LISTED CHEMICAL PRODUCTS Authority: 21 U.S.C. 822(f), 830(a), 871(b), 880, 958(f), 965. 45. In § 1316.03, paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority to make inspections. * * * * * (d) Collecting samples of controlled substances or listed chemicals (in the event any samples are collected during an inspection, the inspector shall issue a receipt for such samples on DEA Form 400 to the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the premises); * * * * * 46. The authority citation for Subpart D of Part 1316 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), 875, 958(d), 965. 47. In § 1316.42, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows: ■ § 1316.42 Definitions. * 41. The authority citation for Part 1314 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 830, 842, 871(b), 875, 877, 886a. 42. In § 1314.45, the introductory paragraph is revised to read as follows: ■ pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES 44. The authority citation for Subpart A of Part 1316 continues to read as follows: ■ § 1316.03 § 1313.33 Contents of an international transaction declaration. § 1314.45 PART 1316—ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS, PRACTICES, AND PROCEDURES Privacy protections. To protect the privacy of individuals who purchase scheduled listed chemical products, the disclosure of information in logbooks under § 1314.30 is restricted as follows: * * * * * ■ 43. In § 1314.115, paragraph (a)(2) is revised to read as follows: * * * * (g) The term proceeding means all actions involving a hearing, commencing with the publication by the Administrator of the notice of proposed rulemaking or the issuance of an order to show cause. * * * * * Dated: January 13, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control. [FR Doc. 2012–1150 Filed 1–26–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P § 1314.115 Distributions not subject to reporting requirements. (a) * * * VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:16 Jan 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 8 RIN 1400–AC64 [Public Notice 7773] Advisory Committee Management AGENCY: ACTION: Department of State. Final rule. This final rule removes regulations which implement the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) for the Department of State. The Department of State implementation of FACA is now governed by the rules promulgated by GSA and internal policy guidance in the Foreign Affairs Manual. SUMMARY: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 27, 2012. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Kottmyer, Office of the Legal Adviser, who may be reached at (202) 647–2318. Pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, agency heads are required to establish uniform administrative guidelines and management controls for advisory committees established by that agency. The Department of State first finalized its rules, codified at 22 CFR Part 8, in 1975. Since then, GSA has promulgated comprehensive guidance at 41 CFR Part 102–3, and the Department recently published updated internal guidance that implements FACA and the GSA regulations. The Department guidance is in Volume 11 of the Foreign Affairs Manual, and can be found at: https:// www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 176811.pdf. The provisions of Part 8 are obsolete and are hereby removed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Analyses Administrative Procedure Act Removing 22 CFR part 8 is a decision regarding the Department’s organization, procedure, or practice and is not subject to the notice-andcomment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business The Department certifies that this rulemaking is not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b). E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM 27JAR1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform This rulemaking is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–121. This rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets. The Department has reviewed this rulemaking in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing or adopting any rule that may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by state, local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rulemaking will not result in any such expenditure nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372 and No. 13132. pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES Although the Department of State is generally exempt from the provisions of Executive Order 12866, it has reviewed this rulemaking to ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in that Executive Order, and has determined that the benefits of the regulation justify any costs. The Department does not consider this rulemaking to be a significant regulatory action within the scope of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order. Executive Order 13563 The Department of State has considered this rule in light of Executive Order 13563, dated January 18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation is consistent with the guidance therein. 15:16 Jan 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Section 5 of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to this rulemaking. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking does not require any collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 8 Advisory Committee Management. Accordingly, under the authority of 22 U.S.C. 2651a, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department removes 22 CFR Part 8. accountability that enhances the safety and well being of all persons covered by the regulation. DATES: Effective: This rule is effective January 27, 2012. Comments must be received by March 27, 2012. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or RIN number and title, by any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1160. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Rangoussis, Senior Policy Advisor, Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO), (703) 696– 9422. This rule is being published as an interim final rule to: a. Implement DoD policy and assign responsibilities for the SAPR Program on prevention, response, and oversight to sexual assault. b. Incorporate all applicable congressional mandates and all applicable recommendations from the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (IG, DoD), Government Accountability Office, and Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services, to include the new Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database (DSAID) that will give the Department a clear view of the number of incidents at the installation level; c. Address vigorous congressional and public interest by publishing a revised and comprehensive DoD policy on the prevention of and response to sexual assaults involving members of the U.S. Armed Forces, which affords victims critical and unprecedented additional protections under this part; and d. Provide field guidance and training requirements to the Military Components to ensure individual resilience and unit readiness in the U.S. Armed Forces, which may be degraded by sexual assault, and thus enable SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PART 8—[REMOVED] Dated: January 12, 1012. Patrick J. Kennedy, Under Secretary for Management. [FR Doc. 2012–1851 Filed 1–26–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–08–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review VerDate Mar<15>2010 Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments Office of the Secretary 32 CFR Part 103 [DoD–2008–OS–0124; 0790–AI37] Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Program Department of Defense. Interim final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: This part implements Department of Defense (DoD) policy and assigns responsibilities for the SAPR Program on prevention, response, and oversight to sexual assault. It is DoD policy to establish a culture free of sexual assault by providing an environment of prevention, education and training, response capability, victim support, reporting procedures, and SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 4239 E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM 27JAR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4238-4239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1851]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 8

RIN 1400-AC64
[Public Notice 7773]


Advisory Committee Management

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule removes regulations which implement the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) for the Department of State. The 
Department of State implementation of FACA is now governed by the rules 
promulgated by GSA and internal policy guidance in the Foreign Affairs 
Manual.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 27, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Kottmyer, Office of the Legal 
Adviser, who may be reached at (202) 647-2318.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, agency heads are 
required to establish uniform administrative guidelines and management 
controls for advisory committees established by that agency.
    The Department of State first finalized its rules, codified at 22 
CFR Part 8, in 1975. Since then, GSA has promulgated comprehensive 
guidance at 41 CFR Part 102-3, and the Department recently published 
updated internal guidance that implements FACA and the GSA regulations. 
The Department guidance is in Volume 11 of the Foreign Affairs Manual, 
and can be found at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/176811.pdf. The provisions of Part 8 are obsolete and are hereby 
removed.

Regulatory Analyses

Administrative Procedure Act

    Removing 22 CFR part 8 is a decision regarding the Department's 
organization, procedure, or practice and is not subject to the notice-
and-comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b).

Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business

    The Department certifies that this rulemaking is not expected to 
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, 
and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b).

[[Page 4239]]

The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

    This rulemaking is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for 
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-
121. This rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy 
of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or 
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, 
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based 
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and 
export markets.

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 
1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before 
proposing or adopting any rule that may result in an annual expenditure 
of $100 million or more by state, local, or tribal governments, or by 
the private sector. This rulemaking will not result in any such 
expenditure nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments.

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism

    This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism 
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372 
and No. 13132.

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review

    Although the Department of State is generally exempt from the 
provisions of Executive Order 12866, it has reviewed this rulemaking to 
ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles 
set forth in that Executive Order, and has determined that the benefits 
of the regulation justify any costs. The Department does not consider 
this rulemaking to be a significant regulatory action within the scope 
of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order.

Executive Order 13563

    The Department of State has considered this rule in light of 
Executive Order 13563, dated January 18, 2011, and affirms that this 
regulation is consistent with the guidance therein.

Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform

    The Department has reviewed this rulemaking in light of sections 
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, 
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce 
burden.

Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments

    The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have 
tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance 
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law. 
Accordingly, the requirements of Section 5 of Executive Order 13175 do 
not apply to this rulemaking.

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking does 
not require any collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 8

    Advisory Committee Management.

    Accordingly, under the authority of 22 U.S.C. 2651a, for the 
reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department removes 22 CFR Part 
8.

PART 8--[REMOVED]

    Dated: January 12, 1012.
Patrick J. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-1851 Filed 1-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.