Advisory Committee Management, 4238-4239 [2012-1851]
Download as PDF
4238
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Distributions by retail distributors
that may not include face-to-face
transactions to the extent that such
distributions are consistent with the
activities authorized for a retail
distributor as specified in the definition
of retail distributor in § 1300.02 of this
chapter, except that this paragraph (a)(2)
does not apply to sales of scheduled
listed chemical products at retail.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The net weight of each listed
chemical given in kilograms or parts
thereof;
*
*
*
*
*
(11) The name, address, business,
telephone number, and, where
available, the facsimile number of the
importer, transferor, or transshipper;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 39. In § 1313.32, paragraph (b)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 1313.32 Requirement of authorization for
international transactions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) A copy of the DEA Form 486 may
be transmitted directly to the Drug
Enforcement Administration, Import/
Export Unit, through electronic
facsimile media not later than 15 days
prior to the exportation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 40. In § 1313.33, paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(4) are revised to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) The name, address, telephone
number, and, where available, the
facsimile number of the chemical
exporter; the name, address, telephone
number, and, where available, the
facsimile number of the chemical
importer;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) The name, address, telephone
number, and, where available, the
facsimile number of the consignee in the
country where the chemical shipment is
destined; the name(s) and address(es) of
any intermediate consignee(s).
PART 1314—RETAIL SALE OF
SCHEDULED LISTED CHEMICAL
PRODUCTS
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 822(f), 830(a), 871(b),
880, 958(f), 965.
45. In § 1316.03, paragraph (d) is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority to make inspections.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Collecting samples of controlled
substances or listed chemicals (in the
event any samples are collected during
an inspection, the inspector shall issue
a receipt for such samples on DEA Form
400 to the owner, operator, or agent in
charge of the premises);
*
*
*
*
*
46. The authority citation for Subpart
D of Part 1316 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), 875,
958(d), 965.
47. In § 1316.42, paragraph (g) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 1316.42
Definitions.
*
41. The authority citation for Part
1314 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 830, 842, 871(b),
875, 877, 886a.
42. In § 1314.45, the introductory
paragraph is revised to read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
44. The authority citation for Subpart
A of Part 1316 continues to read as
follows:
■
§ 1316.03
§ 1313.33 Contents of an international
transaction declaration.
§ 1314.45
PART 1316—ADMINISTRATIVE
FUNCTIONS, PRACTICES, AND
PROCEDURES
Privacy protections.
To protect the privacy of individuals
who purchase scheduled listed
chemical products, the disclosure of
information in logbooks under § 1314.30
is restricted as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 43. In § 1314.115, paragraph (a)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(g) The term proceeding means all
actions involving a hearing,
commencing with the publication by the
Administrator of the notice of proposed
rulemaking or the issuance of an order
to show cause.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 13, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control.
[FR Doc. 2012–1150 Filed 1–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
§ 1314.115 Distributions not subject to
reporting requirements.
(a) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Jan 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 8
RIN 1400–AC64
[Public Notice 7773]
Advisory Committee Management
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Department of State.
Final rule.
This final rule removes
regulations which implement the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) for the Department of State. The
Department of State implementation of
FACA is now governed by the rules
promulgated by GSA and internal policy
guidance in the Foreign Affairs Manual.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 27, 2012.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Kottmyer, Office of the Legal
Adviser, who may be reached at (202)
647–2318.
Pursuant
to Section 8(a) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C.
Appendix, agency heads are required to
establish uniform administrative
guidelines and management controls for
advisory committees established by that
agency.
The Department of State first finalized
its rules, codified at 22 CFR Part 8, in
1975. Since then, GSA has promulgated
comprehensive guidance at 41 CFR Part
102–3, and the Department recently
published updated internal guidance
that implements FACA and the GSA
regulations. The Department guidance is
in Volume 11 of the Foreign Affairs
Manual, and can be found at: https://
www.state.gov/documents/organization/
176811.pdf. The provisions of Part 8 are
obsolete and are hereby removed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
Removing 22 CFR part 8 is a decision
regarding the Department’s
organization, procedure, or practice and
is not subject to the notice-andcomment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
The Department certifies that this
rulemaking is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, and Executive Order
13272, section 3(b).
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
This rulemaking is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This
rulemaking will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more; a major increase in costs or
prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
The Department has reviewed this
rulemaking in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing or
adopting any rule that may result in an
annual expenditure of $100 million or
more by state, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector.
This rulemaking will not result in any
such expenditure nor will it
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This rulemaking will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Although the Department of State is
generally exempt from the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, it has reviewed
this rulemaking to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory
philosophy and principles set forth in
that Executive Order, and has
determined that the benefits of the
regulation justify any costs. The
Department does not consider this
rulemaking to be a significant regulatory
action within the scope of section 3(f)(1)
of the Executive Order.
Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January
18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation
is consistent with the guidance therein.
15:16 Jan 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply to this
rulemaking.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking does
not require any collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 8
Advisory Committee Management.
Accordingly, under the authority of
22 U.S.C. 2651a, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the Department
removes 22 CFR Part 8.
accountability that enhances the safety
and well being of all persons covered by
the regulation.
DATES: Effective: This rule is effective
January 27, 2012. Comments must be
received by March 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana Rangoussis, Senior Policy
Advisor, Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response Office (SAPRO), (703) 696–
9422.
This rule
is being published as an interim final
rule to:
a. Implement DoD policy and assign
responsibilities for the SAPR Program
on prevention, response, and oversight
to sexual assault.
b. Incorporate all applicable
congressional mandates and all
applicable recommendations from the
Inspector General of the Department of
Defense (IG, DoD), Government
Accountability Office, and Defense Task
Force on Sexual Assault in the Military
Services, to include the new Defense
Sexual Assault Incident Database
(DSAID) that will give the Department a
clear view of the number of incidents at
the installation level;
c. Address vigorous congressional and
public interest by publishing a revised
and comprehensive DoD policy on the
prevention of and response to sexual
assaults involving members of the U.S.
Armed Forces, which affords victims
critical and unprecedented additional
protections under this part; and
d. Provide field guidance and training
requirements to the Military
Components to ensure individual
resilience and unit readiness in the U.S.
Armed Forces, which may be degraded
by sexual assault, and thus enable
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PART 8—[REMOVED]
Dated: January 12, 1012.
Patrick J. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2012–1851 Filed 1–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 103
[DoD–2008–OS–0124; 0790–AI37]
Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response (SAPR) Program
Department of Defense.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This part implements
Department of Defense (DoD) policy and
assigns responsibilities for the SAPR
Program on prevention, response, and
oversight to sexual assault. It is DoD
policy to establish a culture free of
sexual assault by providing an
environment of prevention, education
and training, response capability, victim
support, reporting procedures, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4239
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4238-4239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1851]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 8
RIN 1400-AC64
[Public Notice 7773]
Advisory Committee Management
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule removes regulations which implement the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) for the Department of State. The
Department of State implementation of FACA is now governed by the rules
promulgated by GSA and internal policy guidance in the Foreign Affairs
Manual.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Kottmyer, Office of the Legal
Adviser, who may be reached at (202) 647-2318.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, agency heads are
required to establish uniform administrative guidelines and management
controls for advisory committees established by that agency.
The Department of State first finalized its rules, codified at 22
CFR Part 8, in 1975. Since then, GSA has promulgated comprehensive
guidance at 41 CFR Part 102-3, and the Department recently published
updated internal guidance that implements FACA and the GSA regulations.
The Department guidance is in Volume 11 of the Foreign Affairs Manual,
and can be found at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/176811.pdf. The provisions of Part 8 are obsolete and are hereby
removed.
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
Removing 22 CFR part 8 is a decision regarding the Department's
organization, procedure, or practice and is not subject to the notice-
and-comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
The Department certifies that this rulemaking is not expected to
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612,
and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b).
[[Page 4239]]
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-
121. This rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before
proposing or adopting any rule that may result in an annual expenditure
of $100 million or more by state, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This rulemaking will not result in any such
expenditure nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
Although the Department of State is generally exempt from the
provisions of Executive Order 12866, it has reviewed this rulemaking to
ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles
set forth in that Executive Order, and has determined that the benefits
of the regulation justify any costs. The Department does not consider
this rulemaking to be a significant regulatory action within the scope
of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order.
Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January 18, 2011, and affirms that this
regulation is consistent with the guidance therein.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed this rulemaking in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Section 5 of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking does
not require any collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 8
Advisory Committee Management.
Accordingly, under the authority of 22 U.S.C. 2651a, for the
reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department removes 22 CFR Part
8.
PART 8--[REMOVED]
Dated: January 12, 1012.
Patrick J. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-1851 Filed 1-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P