Board on Coastal Engineering Research, 3240-3241 [2012-1193]
Download as PDF
3240
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Notices
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
amended rule will allow these briefs to
be timely filed.
The proposal would not apply only to
Project Outreach cases. Rather, as a
general matter, law school clinical
programs do not operate continuously
through the year and may only become
aware of cases where they with to file
an amicus curiae brief well after the
brief can be timely filed. This rule will
better allow these programs to file briefs
with the Court and, thereby, the rules
will facilitate this vital part of law
school training for appellate advocates.
The proposed rule also gives the
Court and the parties sufficient time to
react to the student brief by requiring
that it be filed no less than 14 days
before oral argument and by allowing
the parties the opportunity to respond
within 7 days of the filing of the amicus
curiae brief.
Rule 19(b)
The first sentences of Rule 19(b)(1),
(2), and (3) currently read:
(b) Certificate for review/brief/
answer/reply.
(1) Article 62, UCMJ, cases. In cases
involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals on appeal by the
United States under Article 62, UCMJ,
10 U.S.C. 862, a certificate for review,
together with a supporting brief in
accordance with Rule 24 on behalf of
the appellant, shall be filed with the
Court by the Judge Advocate General no
later than 30 days after the date of the
decision of the Court of Criminal
Appeals.
(2) Extraordinary relief cases. In cases
involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals on application for
extraordinary relief filed therein, a
certificate for review, together with a
supporting brief in accordance with
Rule 24 on behalf of the appellant, shall
be filed with the Court by the Judge
Advocate General no later than 30 days
after the date of the decision of the
Court of Criminal Appeals.
(3) Other cases. In all other cases
involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals, a certificate for
review filed by the Judge Advocate
General shall be filed either (a) no later
than 30 days after the date of the
decision of the Court of Criminal
Appeals, or (b) no later than 30 days
after a petition for grant of review is
granted.
The proposed changes to the first
sentences of Rule 19(b)(1), (2) and (3)
would read:
(1) Article 62, UCMJ, cases. In cases
involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals on appeal by the
United States under Article 62, UCMJ,
10 U.S.C. 862, a certificate for review,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
together with a supporting brief in
accordance with Rule 24 on behalf of
the appellant, shall be filed with the
Court by the Judge Advocate General no
later than 60 days after the date of the
decision of the Court of Criminal
Appeals.
(2) Extraordinary relief cases. In cases
involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals on application for
extraordinary relief filed therein, a
certificate for review, together with a
supporting brief in accordance with
Rule 24 on behalf of the appellant, shall
be filed with the Court by the Judge
Advocate General no later than 60 days
after the date of the decision of the
Court of Criminal Appeals.
(3) Other cases. In all other cases
involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals, a certificate for
review filed by the Judge Advocate
General shall be filed either (a) no later
than 60 days after the date of the
decision of the Court of Criminal
Appeals, or (b) no later than 30 days
after a petition for grant of review is
granted.
Comment: Rule 19(b) currently allows
30 days for the filing of certificates for
review by the Judge Advocate General,
although a service member is given 60
days to file a petition for grant of
review. Extension requests are filed in
nearly all of the cases in which a
certificate is to be filed, and the Rules
Advisory Committee has determined
that the 30 days allowed by this rule is
insufficient time to obtain the necessary
approvals and to file the certificate.
This change to 60 days will not apply
in those cases where the Court grants a
petition for grant of review, and the
government wishes to request the Judge
Advocate General to file a certificate for
review. In that event, the Judge
Advocate General will continue to have
30 days from the date the petition is
granted to file the certificate for review.
The 30-day deadline in these cases
should not be extended because it will
slow the processing of the case by the
Court, and it will be less onerous
because the case is already before the
Court, making it easier for the services
to determine whether they wish to bring
additional issues before the Court in
those cases.
Rule 27(a)(4)
The proposed change would delete
Rule 27(a)(4) in its entirety:
(4) Electronic message petitions. The
Court will not docket petitions for
extraordinary relief submitted by means
of an electronic message or by facsimile
without prior approval of the Clerk.
Comment: This rule has become
obsolete. It permits the filing of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘electronic message’’ petitions for
extraordinary relief with the permission
of the Clerk. This provision
contemplated the use of military
message traffic or facsimile to file such
petitions. However, with the use of the
current electronic filing program, the
filing of pleadings by military message
or facsimile is no longer necessary.
[FR Doc. 2012–1187 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Board on Coastal Engineering
Research
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463),
announcement is made of the following
committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Board on Coastal
Engineering Research.
DATES: Date of Meeting: February 7–8,
2012.
Place: Hearing Room, Kingman
Building, 7701 Telegraph Road,
Alexandria, VA 22315.
Time: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (February 7,
2012), 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. (February 8,
2012).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Inquiries and notice of intent to attend
the meeting may be addressed to COL
Kevin J. Wilson, Executive Secretary,
U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, Waterways
Experiment Station, 3909 Halls Ferry
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180–6199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board
provides broad policy guidance and
review of plans and fund requirements
for the conduct of research and
development of research projects in
consonance with the needs of the
coastal engineering field and the
objectives of the Chief of Engineers.
Proposed Agenda: On Tuesday,
February 7, the Executive Session is
devoted to addressing the role of the
Board on Coastal Engineering Research,
including the history of the Board,
discussion of the Board functions and
responsibilities, and ways to enhance
the value of the Board recommendations
to the Chief of Engineers. The Board
will also discuss the annual meeting
and executive sessions formats.
On Wednesday morning, February 8,
the Board will discuss pending action
items.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Notices
The meeting is open to the public, but
since seating capacity of the meeting
room is limited, advance notice of intent
to attend is required.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Kevin J. Wilson,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Executive
Secretary.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Hold North Dakota Task
Force Meeting as Established by the
Missouri River Protection and
Improvement Act of 2000 (Title VII)
Department of the Army, U.S
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
The duties of the Task Force
are to prepare and approve a plan for
the use of the funds made available
under Title VII to promote conservation
practices in the Missouri River
watershed, control and remove
sediment from the Missouri River,
protect recreation on the Missouri River
from sedimentation, and protect Indian
and non-Indian historical and cultural
sites along the Missouri River from
erosion.
SUMMARY:
North Dakota Missouri River
Task Force established by the Missouri
River Protection and Improvement Act
of 2000 will hold a meeting on February
28th from 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Best Western Doublewood Inn
located at 1400 East Interchange Avenue
in Bismarck, ND.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gwyn M. Jarrett at (402) 995–2717.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
objectives of the Task Force are to
prepare and approve a plan for the use
of the funds made available under Title
VII, develop and recommend to the
Secretary of the Army ways to
implement critical restoration projects
meeting the goals of the plan, and
determine if these projects primarily
benefit the Federal Government. Written
requests may be sent to Gwyn M. Jarrett,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1616
Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE 68102–
4901.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: January 6, 2012.
Gwyn M. Jarrett,
Project Manager.
[FR Doc. 2012–1196 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Department of Education.
Comment request.
The Department of Education
(the Department), in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)),
provides the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and continuing
collections of information. This helps
the Department assess the impact of its
information collection requirements and
minimize the reporting burden on the
public and helps the public understand
the Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. The Director,
Information Collection Clearance
Division, Privacy, Information and
Records Management Services, Office of
Management, invites comments on the
proposed information collection
requests as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L.104–13).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before March
23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding burden and/or the collection
activity requirements should be
electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or mailed to U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., LBJ, Washington, DC
20202–4537. Please note that written
comments received in response to this
notice will be considered public
records.
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2012–1193 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
DATES:
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that Federal agencies provide interested
parties an early opportunity to comment
on information collection requests. The
Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Privacy, Information
and Records Management Services,
Office of Management, publishes this
notice containing proposed information
collection requests at the beginning of
the Departmental review of the
information collection. The Department
of Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3241
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology.
Dated: January 18, 2012.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Privacy, Information and Records
Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: Revision.
Title of Collection: Quick Response
Information System (QRIS) 2012–2015
System Clearance.
OMB Control Number: 1850–0733.
Agency Form Number(s): N/A.
Frequency of Responses: Once.
Affected Public: Individuals or
household; Not-for-profit institutions;
State, Local, or Tribal Government.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 104,004.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 31,704.
Abstract: The National Center for
Education Statistics Quick Response
Information System (QRIS) consists of
the Fast Response Survey System
(FRSS) and the Postsecondary
Education Quick Information System
(PEQIS). The QRIS currently conducts
surveys under Office of Management
and Budget generic clearance 1850–
0733, which expires in September 2012.
This submission requests approval to
continue the current clearance
conditions through 2015. FRSS
primarily conducts surveys of the
elementary/secondary sector (districts,
schools) and public libraries. PEQIS
conducts surveys of the postsecondary
education sector. FRSS and PEQIS
surveys are cleared under the QRIS
generic clearance. The QRIS clearance is
subject to the regular clearance process
at OMB with a 60-day notice and a 30day notice as part of the 120-day review
period. Each individual FRSS or PEQIS
survey is then subject to clearance
process with an abbreviated clearance
package, justifying the particular
content of the survey, describing the
sample design, the timeline for the
survey activities, and the questionnaire.
The review period for each individual
survey is approximately 45 days,
including a 30-day Federal Register
notice period. OMB will provide
comments as soon after the end of the
30-day notice period as possible. This
generic clearance request is for surveys
of state education agencies, school
districts, schools, postsecondary
institutions, and libraries. Surveys of
teachers, students, commercial
establishments, and households are not
included in this request.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3240-3241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1193]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Board on Coastal Engineering Research
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following
committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Board on Coastal Engineering Research.
DATES: Date of Meeting: February 7-8, 2012.
Place: Hearing Room, Kingman Building, 7701 Telegraph Road,
Alexandria, VA 22315.
Time: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (February 7, 2012), 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
(February 8, 2012).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries and notice of intent to
attend the meeting may be addressed to COL Kevin J. Wilson, Executive
Secretary, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center,
Waterways Experiment Station, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS
39180-6199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board provides broad policy guidance and
review of plans and fund requirements for the conduct of research and
development of research projects in consonance with the needs of the
coastal engineering field and the objectives of the Chief of Engineers.
Proposed Agenda: On Tuesday, February 7, the Executive Session is
devoted to addressing the role of the Board on Coastal Engineering
Research, including the history of the Board, discussion of the Board
functions and responsibilities, and ways to enhance the value of the
Board recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Board will also
discuss the annual meeting and executive sessions formats.
On Wednesday morning, February 8, the Board will discuss pending
action items.
[[Page 3241]]
The meeting is open to the public, but since seating capacity of
the meeting room is limited, advance notice of intent to attend is
required.
Kevin J. Wilson,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1193 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P