Security Zone; Choptank River and Cambridge Channel, Cambridge, MD, 3118-3121 [2012-1172]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
3118
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
from 12:01 a.m. on January 23, 2012
until 12:01 a.m. on April 1, 2012. It will
be activated for enforcement as
described in paragraph (d) of this
section.
(d) Enforcement Periods. The Captain
of the Port Columbia River will cause
notice of the enforcement of the grainshipment vessel safety zone to be made
by all appropriate means to effect the
widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public as practicable, in
accordance with 33 CFR 165.7. This
notification of enforcement will identify
the grain-shipment vessel by name and
IMO number. Such means of
notification may include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notices to
Mariners or Local Notices to Mariners.
The Captain of the Port Columbia River
will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners
notifying the public when enforcement
of the grain-shipment vessel safety zone
is suspended. Upon notice of
enforcement by the Captain of the Port
Columbia River, the Coast Guard will
enforce the grain-shipment vessel safety
zone in accordance with rules set out in
this section. Upon notice of suspension
of enforcement by the Captain of the
Port Columbia River, all persons and
vessels are authorized to enter, transit,
and exit the grain-shipment vessel
safety zone, consistent with the
Navigation Rules.
(e) Regulation. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within
these zones is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Columbia River, the official patrol, or
other designated representatives of the
Captain of the Port.
(2) To request authorization to enter
or operate within a grain-shipment
vessel safety zone contact the on-scene
official patrol on VHF–FM channel 16
or 13. Authorization will be granted
based on the necessity of access and
consistent with safe navigation.
(3) Vessels authorized to enter or
operate within a grain-shipment vessel
safety zone shall operate at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course and shall proceed as
directed by the on-scene official patrol.
The Navigation Rules shall apply at all
times within a grain-shipment vessel
safety zone.
(4) Maneuver-restricted vessels. When
conditions permit, the on-scene official
patrol should:
(i) Permit vessels constrained by their
navigational draft or restricted in their
ability to maneuver to enter or operate
within a grain-shipment vessel safety
zone in order to ensure a safe passage
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
in accordance with the Navigation
Rules; and
(ii) Permit commercial vessels
anchored in a designated anchorage area
to remain at anchor within a grainshipment vessel safety zone; and
(iii) Permit vessels that must transit
via a navigable channel or waterway to
enter or operate within a grain-shipment
vessel safety zone in order to do so.
(f) Exemption. Public vessels as
defined in paragraph (a) of this section
are exempt from complying with
paragraph (e) of this section.
(g) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
may enforce the rules in this section. In
the navigable waters of the United
States to which this section applies,
when immediate action is required and
representatives of the Coast Guard are
not present or are not present in
sufficient force to provide effective
enforcement of this section, any Federal
Law Enforcement Officer, Oregon Law
Enforcement Officer, or Washington
Law Enforcement Officer may enforce
the rules contained in this section
pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 70118. In
addition, the Captain of the Port may be
assisted by other federal, state or local
agencies in enforcing this section.
(h) Waiver. The Captain of the Port
Columbia River may waive any of the
requirements of this section for any
vessel or class of vessels upon finding
that operational conditions or other
circumstances are such that application
of this section is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of port
safety or environmental safety.
Dated: January 6, 2012.
B. C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2012–1171 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1164]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Choptank River and
Cambridge Channel, Cambridge, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the
Choptank River and Cambridge Channel
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in order to safeguard high-ranking
public officials from terrorist acts and
incidents. This action is necessary to
ensure the safety of persons and
property, and prevent terrorist acts or
incidents. This rule prohibits vessels
and people from entering the security
zone and requires vessels and persons
in the security zone to depart the
security zone, unless specifically
exempt under the provisions in this rule
or granted specific permission from the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
on January 25, 2012, until 11:59 p.m. on
January 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1164 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1164 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck,
at Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (410) 576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date of this rule. The Coast
Guard is establishing the security zone
to protect high-ranking government
officials, mitigate potential terrorist acts,
and enhance public and maritime safety
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
and security. The Coast Guard was
unable to publish a NPRM due to the
short time period between event
planners notifying the Coast Guard of
the event and publication of the security
zone. Furthermore, delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
security zone’s intended objectives of
protecting high-ranking government
officials, mitigating potential terrorist
acts and enhancing public and maritime
safety security.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment, therefore, a 30-day
notice period is impracticable. Delaying
the effective date would be contrary to
the security zone’s intended objectives
of protecting high-ranking government
officials, mitigating potential terrorist
acts and enhancing public and maritime
safety and security.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background and Purpose
The U.S. House of Representatives
Democratic Issues Conference will be
held at the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake
Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina in
Cambridge, Maryland during January
25–27, 2012. Activities associated with
this event include the movement of
high-ranking United States officials
across the Senator Frederick C. Malkus
Memorial (US–50) Bridge at Cambridge,
Maryland. The event is located along
the waterfront in Cambridge, MD, in
close proximity to navigable waterways
within the Captain of the Port’s Area of
Responsibility.
The Coast Guard has given each Coast
Guard Captain of the Port the ability to
implement comprehensive port security
regimes designed to safeguard human
life, vessels, and waterfront facilities
while still sustaining the flow of
commerce. The Captain of the Port
Baltimore is establishing this security
zone to protect high-ranking
government officials, mitigate potential
terrorist acts, and enhance public and
maritime safety and security in order to
safeguard life, property, and the
environment on or near the navigable
waters.
Discussion of Rule
Through this regulation, the Coast
Guard will establish a security zone.
The security zone will be in effect from
8 a.m. on January 25, 2012, through
11:59 p.m. on January 27, 2012. The
security zone will include all navigable
waters of the Choptank River, within
2,000 yards of the Hyatt Regency
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and
Marina’s Breakwater Pavilion, in
approximate position latitude 38°33′54″
N, longitude 076°02′47″ W, located in
Cambridge, Maryland. In addition, the
security zone will include all navigable
waters of the Choptank River and
Cambridge Channel, within an area
bounded on the west by a line drawn
between position latitude 38°35′52″ N,
longitude 076°03′11″ W and position
latitude 38°34′25″ N, longitude
076°04′14″ W and bounded on the east
by a line drawn between position
latitude 38°35′06″ N, longitude
076°02′27’’ W and position latitude
38°34′02″ N, longitude 076°03′10″ W.
These locations are entirely within the
Area of Responsibility of the Captain of
the Port Baltimore, as set forth at 33 CFR
3.25–15.
This rule provides that entry into,
attempted entry into, or remaining in
this security zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port Baltimore. Except for persons
or vessels authorized by the Captain of
the Port Baltimore, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area during the effective period. Vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor at
the time the security zone is
implemented, however, do not have to
depart the security zone. All vessels
underway within the security zone at
the time it becomes effective are to
depart the zone immediately. To seek
permission to transit the area, the
Captain of the Port Baltimore can be
contacted at telephone number (410)
576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio,
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Coast
Guard vessels enforcing the security
zone can be contacted on Marine Band
Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). The Coast Guard will issue
Broadcast Notices to Mariners to further
publicize the security zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this security zone
restricts vessel traffic through the
affected area, vessels may seek
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3119
permission from the Captain of the Port
Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
Furthermore, the effect of this regulation
will not be significant due to the limited
size and duration that the regulated area
will be in effect. In addition,
notifications will be made to the
maritime community via marine
information broadcasts so mariners may
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate or transit
through or within the security zone
during the enforcement period. The
security zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. The security zone is
of limited size and duration. Although
the security zone will apply to the entire
widths of the Choptank River and
Cambridge Channel, traffic may be
allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Before the effective period,
maritime advisories will be widely
available to the maritime community.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
3120
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary
security zone. An environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–1164 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–1164 Security Zone; Choptank
River and Cambridge Channel, Cambridge,
MD.
(a) Locations. The following areas are
a security zone:
(1) All waters of the Choptank River,
within 2,000 yards of the Hyatt Regency
Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and
Marina’s Breakwater Pavilion, in
approximate position latitude 38°33′54″
N, longitude 076°02′47″ W, located in
Cambridge, Maryland; and
(2) All waters of the Choptank River
and Cambridge Channel, within an area
bounded on the west by a line drawn
between position latitude 38°35′52″ N,
longitude 076°03′11″ W and position
latitude 38°34′25″ N, longitude
076°04′14″ W and bounded on the east
by a line drawn between position
latitude 38°35′06″ N, longitude
076°02′27″ W and position latitude
38°34′02″ N, longitude 076°03′10″ W.
All positions refer to North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means
the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(c) Regulations. The general security
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.33 apply to the security zone
created by this temporary section,
§ 165.T05–1164.
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Vessels already at berth,
mooring, or anchor at the time the
security zone is implemented, however,
do not have to depart the security zone.
All vessels underway within this
security zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone. The
Captain of the Port Baltimore may, in
his discretion, grant waivers or
exemptions to this rule, either on a caseby-case basis or categorically to a
particular class of vessel that otherwise
is subject to adequate control measures.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the security zone must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port
Baltimore and his designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number (410) 576–2693 or on
Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel, or other Federal, State, or local
agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a
vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zones by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. The security
zone will be enforced from 8 a.m. on
January 25, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. on
January 27, 2012.
Dated: January 10, 2012.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012–1172 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 668
RIN 1840–AD06
[Docket ID ED–2010–OPE–0012]
Program Integrity: Gainful
Employment—Debt Measures;
Correction
Department of Education.
Final regulations; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On June 13, 2011, the
Secretary of Education (Secretary)
published a notice of final regulations in
the Federal Register for Program
Integrity: Gainful Employment—Debt
Measures (Gainful Employment—Debt
Measures) (76 FR 34386). In the
preamble of the final regulations, we
used the wrong data to calculate the
percent of total variance in institutions’
repayment rates that may be explained
by race/ethnicity. Our intent was to use
the data that included all minority
students per institution. However, we
mistakenly used the data for a subset of
minority students per institution. We
have now recalculated the total variance
using the data that includes all minority
students. Through this document, we
correct, in the preamble of the Gainful
Employment—Debt Measures final
regulations, the errors resulting from
this misapplication. We do not change
the regression analysis model itself; we
are using the same model with the
appropriate data. Through this notice
we also correct, in the preamble of the
Gainful Employment—Debt Measures
final regulations, our description of one
component of the regression analysis.
The preamble referred to use of an
institutional variable measuring
acceptance rates. This description was
incorrect; in fact we used an
institutional variable measuring
retention rates. Correcting this language
does not change the regression analysis
model itself or the variance explained
by the model. The text of the final
regulations remains unchanged.
DATES: These regulations are effective
July 1, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Kolotos or David Bergeron for general
information only. Telephone: (202) 502–
7805. Any other questions or requests
for information regarding these final
regulations must be submitted to:
GEQuestions@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–(800) 877–
8339.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3121
We make
the following corrections to the Gainful
Employment—Debt Measures final
regulations:
On page 34460, third column, we
correct the phrase ‘‘(i.e., 72 percent for
4-year public institutions; 57 percent for
2-year nonprofit institutions; and 56
percent for 4-year nonprofit
institutions).’’ to read ‘‘(i.e., 71 percent
for 4-year public institutions; 64 percent
for 2-year nonprofit institutions; and 61
percent for 4-year nonprofit
institutions).’’
On page 34461, first column, first
paragraph, we correct the sentences
‘‘Similarly, in four of the nine models,
the proportion of an institution’s
student body that was represented by
students identified as racial/ethnic
minorities was a statistically significant
predictor. However, in no case did it
explain more than approximately 13
percent of variance in repayment rates.’’
to read ‘‘Similarly, in eight of the nine
models, the proportion of an
institution’s student body that was
represented by students identified as
racial/ethnic minorities was a
statistically significant predictor. Across
those models, it ranged from explaining
6.5 percent (4-year, for-profit
institutions) to 37.8 percent (2-year,
nonprofit institutions) of the variance in
repayment rates.’’
On page 34461, second column, first
full paragraph, we correct the phrase
‘‘72 percent’’ to read ‘‘71 percent’’.
On page 34461, second column, first
full paragraph, we correct the sentence
‘‘However, when used as a sole
predictor, the percentage of Pell Grant
recipients was not a statistically
significant predictor.’’ to read ‘‘An
institution’s percentage of minority
students explained 29 percent of the
variance in repayment rates when used
as a sole predictor.’’
On page 34461, second column,
second full paragraph, we correct the
phrase ‘‘56 percent’’ to read ‘‘61
percent’’.
On page 34461, third column,
carryover paragraph, we correct the
phrase ‘‘less than 2 percent’’ to read ‘‘31
percent’’.
On page 34461, third column, first
full paragraph, we correct the phrase
‘‘22 percent’’ to read ‘‘27 percent’’.
On page 34461, third column, first
full paragraph, we correct the sentence
‘‘The racial/ethnic composition of an
institution’s student body was not a
statistically significant predictor when
used alone to model repayment rates,
and, although the percentage of students
receiving Pell Grants was predictive, it
explained only 7 percent of the variance
in repayment rates.’’ to read ‘‘Both the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3118-3121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1172]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1164]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Choptank River and Cambridge Channel, Cambridge,
MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the Choptank River and Cambridge Channel
in order to safeguard high-ranking public officials from terrorist acts
and incidents. This action is necessary to ensure the safety of persons
and property, and prevent terrorist acts or incidents. This rule
prohibits vessels and people from entering the security zone and
requires vessels and persons in the security zone to depart the
security zone, unless specifically exempt under the provisions in this
rule or granted specific permission from the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. on January 25, 2012, until
11:59 p.m. on January 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1164 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1164 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Sector Baltimore
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone (410) 576-2674,
email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is contrary to public interest to
delay the effective date of this rule. The Coast Guard is establishing
the security zone to protect high-ranking government officials,
mitigate potential terrorist acts, and enhance public and maritime
safety
[[Page 3119]]
and security. The Coast Guard was unable to publish a NPRM due to the
short time period between event planners notifying the Coast Guard of
the event and publication of the security zone. Furthermore, delaying
the effective date would be contrary to the security zone's intended
objectives of protecting high-ranking government officials, mitigating
potential terrorist acts and enhancing public and maritime safety
security.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment, therefore, a 30-day notice period is
impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
security zone's intended objectives of protecting high-ranking
government officials, mitigating potential terrorist acts and enhancing
public and maritime safety and security.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. House of Representatives Democratic Issues Conference will
be held at the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina
in Cambridge, Maryland during January 25-27, 2012. Activities
associated with this event include the movement of high-ranking United
States officials across the Senator Frederick C. Malkus Memorial (US-
50) Bridge at Cambridge, Maryland. The event is located along the
waterfront in Cambridge, MD, in close proximity to navigable waterways
within the Captain of the Port's Area of Responsibility.
The Coast Guard has given each Coast Guard Captain of the Port the
ability to implement comprehensive port security regimes designed to
safeguard human life, vessels, and waterfront facilities while still
sustaining the flow of commerce. The Captain of the Port Baltimore is
establishing this security zone to protect high-ranking government
officials, mitigate potential terrorist acts, and enhance public and
maritime safety and security in order to safeguard life, property, and
the environment on or near the navigable waters.
Discussion of Rule
Through this regulation, the Coast Guard will establish a security
zone. The security zone will be in effect from 8 a.m. on January 25,
2012, through 11:59 p.m. on January 27, 2012. The security zone will
include all navigable waters of the Choptank River, within 2,000 yards
of the Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina's
Breakwater Pavilion, in approximate position latitude 38[deg]33'54'' N,
longitude 076[deg]02'47'' W, located in Cambridge, Maryland. In
addition, the security zone will include all navigable waters of the
Choptank River and Cambridge Channel, within an area bounded on the
west by a line drawn between position latitude 38[deg]35'52'' N,
longitude 076[deg]03'11'' W and position latitude 38[deg]34'25'' N,
longitude 076[deg]04'14'' W and bounded on the east by a line drawn
between position latitude 38[deg]35'06'' N, longitude 076[deg]02'27'' W
and position latitude 38[deg]34'02'' N, longitude 076[deg]03'10'' W.
These locations are entirely within the Area of Responsibility of the
Captain of the Port Baltimore, as set forth at 33 CFR 3.25-15.
This rule provides that entry into, attempted entry into, or
remaining in this security zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. Except for persons or
vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area during the effective
period. Vessels already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the
security zone is implemented, however, do not have to depart the
security zone. All vessels underway within the security zone at the
time it becomes effective are to depart the zone immediately. To seek
permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Baltimore can
be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693 or on Marine Band
Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Coast Guard vessels enforcing the
security zone can be contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners
to further publicize the security zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this security zone restricts
vessel traffic through the affected area, vessels may seek permission
from the Captain of the Port Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
Furthermore, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due
to the limited size and duration that the regulated area will be in
effect. In addition, notifications will be made to the maritime
community via marine information broadcasts so mariners may adjust
their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending
to operate or transit through or within the security zone during the
enforcement period. The security zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. The security zone is of limited size and duration.
Although the security zone will apply to the entire widths of the
Choptank River and Cambridge Channel, traffic may be allowed to pass
through the zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Before the effective period, maritime advisories will be
widely available to the maritime community.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call
[[Page 3120]]
1-888-REG-FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a
temporary security zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-1164 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-1164 Security Zone; Choptank River and Cambridge
Channel, Cambridge, MD.
(a) Locations. The following areas are a security zone:
(1) All waters of the Choptank River, within 2,000 yards of the
Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort, Spa and Marina's Breakwater
Pavilion, in approximate position latitude 38[deg]33'54'' N, longitude
076[deg]02'47'' W, located in Cambridge, Maryland; and
(2) All waters of the Choptank River and Cambridge Channel, within
an area bounded on the west by a line drawn between position latitude
38[deg]35'52'' N, longitude 076[deg]03'11'' W and position latitude
38[deg]34'25'' N, longitude 076[deg]04'14'' W and bounded on the east
by a line drawn between position latitude 38[deg]35'06'' N, longitude
076[deg]02'27'' W and position latitude 38[deg]34'02'' N, longitude
076[deg]03'10'' W. All positions refer to North American Datum 1983.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.33 apply to the security zone created by this temporary
section, Sec. 165.T05-1164.
[[Page 3121]]
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. Vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the security zone is
implemented, however, do not have to depart the security zone. All
vessels underway within this security zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone. The Captain of the Port Baltimore
may, in his discretion, grant waivers or exemptions to this rule,
either on a case-by-case basis or categorically to a particular class
of vessel that otherwise is subject to adequate control measures.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone must
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
his designated representative. To seek permission to transit the area,
the Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives
can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693 or on Marine Band
Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his
designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zones by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. The security zone will be enforced from 8
a.m. on January 25, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. on January 27, 2012.
Dated: January 10, 2012.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012-1172 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P