Electronic Export Application and Certification Charge; Flexibility in the Requirements for Export Inspection Marks, Devices, and Certificates; Egg Products Export Certification, 3159-3166 [2012-1158]
Download as PDF
3159
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 14
Monday, January 23, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 312, 322, 350, 362, 381,
590, and 592
[Docket No. FSIS–2009–0026]
RIN 0583–AD41
Electronic Export Application and
Certification Charge; Flexibility in the
Requirements for Export Inspection
Marks, Devices, and Certificates; Egg
Products Export Certification
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is proposing
to amend the meat and poultry
inspection regulations to provide for an
electronic export application and
certification system. The electronic
export application and certification
system will be a component of the
Agency’s Public Health Information
System (PHIS). The export component
of PHIS will be available as an
alternative to the paper-based
application and certification process.
FSIS is proposing to charge users for the
use of the proposed system. FSIS is
proposing to establish a formula for
calculating the fee. FSIS intends to
publish notice of the fee, using the
formula, in the Federal Register on an
annual basis. FSIS is also proposing to
provide flexibility in the requirements
for official export inspection marks,
devices, and certificates. In addition,
FSIS is proposing to amend the egg
product export regulations that parallel
the meat and poultry product export
regulations.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on or before
March 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested
persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: This
Web site provides the ability to type
short comments directly into the
comment field on this Web page or
attach a file for lengthier comments. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
• Mail, including floppy disks or CD–
ROMs, and hand- or courier-delivered
items: Send to Docket Clerk, U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
FSIS, Patriots Plaza 3, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Room 8–
163A, Mailstop 3782, Washington, DC
20250–3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by
mail or electronic mail must include the
Agency name and docket number FSIS–
2009–0026. Comments received in
response to this docket will be made
available for public inspection and
posted without change, including any
personal information, to https://www.
regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to background
documents or comments received, go to
the FSIS Docket Room at the address
listed above between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Ron Jones, Assistant Administrator,
Office of International Affairs, FSIS,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Room 3143,
Washington, DC 20250–3700, (202) 720–
3473.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Meat Inspection Act
(FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601–695) and the
Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA)
(21 U.S.C. 451–470) provide for the
export and certification of meat and
poultry products. The Federal meat and
poultry products inspection regulations
require exporters to apply for official
export certificates to ship federally
inspected and passed meat and poultry
products to foreign countries (9 CFR
322.2 and 381.105). The Federal meat
and poultry products inspection
regulations also contain specific
requirements for the official marking of
exported products, for the devices for
marking shipping containers, and for
the official export certificate (9 CFR
312.8, 322.1, 322.2, 381.104, 381.105,
and 381.106).
The Agricultural Marketing Act
(AMA) provides the Secretary of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Agriculture with the authority to collect
fees ‘‘as will be reasonable and as nearly
as may be to cover the cost of the service
rendered, to the end that agricultural
products may be marketed to the best
advantage, that trading may be
facilitated, and that consumers may be
able to obtain the quality product which
they desire’’ (7 U.S.C 1622(h)).
Under the authority of the AMA, the
meat and poultry regulations provide
that FSIS may make certifications
regarding exported meat and poultry
products meeting conditions or
standards that are not imposed, or that
are in addition to those imposed, by the
meat and poultry regulations, the FMIA,
or the PPIA. Under 9 CFR 350.3(b),
350.7, 362.2(b), and 362.5, FSIS collects
fees from establishments and facilities
that request certification service that is
in addition to the basic export
certification of wholesomeness. FSIS is
now proposing to establish a fee for
utilizing a new electronic export
application and certification system.
The system will be a service FSIS will
provide to exporters that will enable
them to submit, track, and manage
export applications and certificates
more efficiently and effectively than is
possible under the current system.
The Egg Products Inspection Act
(EPIA) (21 U.S.C. 1031–1056) does not
set forth specific provisions for the
export of egg products, and FSIS’s egg
products inspection regulations do not
include requirements for exported egg
products. As discussed below, FSIS is
proposing egg products regulations to
parallel the meat and poultry
requirements, including a provision for
inspectors to make certifications that
egg products for export meet conditions
or standards that are not imposed, or
that are in addition to those that may be
imposed, by the egg products
regulations under the EPIA.
Export Application and Certification
Process
Under 9 CFR 322.2(a) and 381.105(a),
exporters of meat and poultry products
may apply for an export certificate. The
Application for Export Certificate (FSIS
Form 9060–6) is available from
inspection personnel, or exporters can
submit a computer-generated (paper)
copy. The poultry products regulations,
in addition to requiring an application
for an export certificate, provide for an
‘‘upon request’’ certification. The ‘‘upon
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
3160
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
request’’ certification provides that an
inspector will complete the application
based on information supplied by the
poultry exporter.
FSIS inspection personnel review the
completed export application to verify
that the information is correct and that
it is signed. After inspection personnel
reinspect product that is intended for
export (9 CFR 322.2 and 381.105), they
sign the application certifying that the
product was examined in accordance
with Agency policy.
As provided in 9 CFR 322.1(a) and
381.105(a), each shipping container is
marked with the official export stamp
bearing the serial number on the export
certificate. Both 9 CFR 312.8(a) and
381.104 provide for an official device to
apply the official export stamp. After
the export application has been signed,
inspection personnel provide the
establishment with the official export
stamp to mark product destined for
export. After the shipping containers are
marked, inspection personnel secure the
stamp and sign the completed Meat and
Poultry Export Certificate of
Wholesomeness (FSIS Form 9060–5).
The Meat and Poultry Export Certificate
of Wholesomeness provides certification
that the meat or poultry product
originated from animals that received
ante-mortem and post-mortem
inspection and were found to be
wholesome and fit for human
consumption.
Both 9 CFR 312.8 and 381.106
provide that the export certificate is a
paper certificate form for signature by a
program employee or inspector, bearing
a letterhead and the seal of the United
States Department of Agriculture, and a
serial number.
The regulations also require that the
export certificate be issued in triplicate
for meat products and in duplicate for
poultry products. The meat and poultry
products inspection regulations include
specific requirements for where and to
whom the original, duplicate, and
triplicate are to be distributed (9 CFR
322.2 (d), (e), and (f), and 381.105(b)
and (c)).
The Public Health Information System
(PHIS)
FSIS is implementing the Public
Health Information System (PHIS), a
computerized, Web-based inspection
information system. The PHIS will
integrate and automate the Agency’s
paper-based business processes into one
comprehensive and fully automated
data-driven inspection system. The
PHIS will significantly improve the
Agency’s efforts to collect, consolidate,
and analyze data in order to improve
public health. The PHIS includes an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
export component that will streamline
and automate the export application and
certification process.
The PHIS export component will
enable exporters to electronically
submit, track, and manage export
applications and certificates. For
example, exporters will be able to access
their online account to submit
applications, delay the issuance of a
certificate, cancel pending applications
and certificates, and apply for
replacement or ‘‘in lieu of’’ certificates.
Exporters that submit paper
applications will not be able to submit,
track, or manage their applications and
certificates in this manner. FSIS
inspection personnel will be able to
access the PHIS to electronically
approve export applications and
certificates.
FSIS will consider any data and the
electronic records (applications and
certifications) submitted and processed
through the PHIS equivalent to paper
records. Export certifications
transmitted electronically are official.
To access and use the PHIS export
component, exporters will need to
register for an USDA eAuthentication
account with Level 2 access. An
eAuthentication account enables
individuals within and outside of the
USDA to obtain user-identification
accounts to access a wide range of
USDA applications through the Internet.
The Level 2 access will provide users
the ability to conduct official electronic
business transactions. To register for a
Level 2 eAuthentication account, the
user will need to have access to the
Internet and a valid email address. To
learn more about eAuthentication and
how to register for an account, visit
https://www.eauth.egov.usda.gov/.
The Agency plans to provide
exporters with more specific, detailed
information on how to access the PHIS
to submit export applications and
manage export certificates. The Agency
intends to provide exporters with
assistance and technical support in
obtaining Level 2 eAuthentication
access and in accessing and navigating
the PHIS export component. Any
information concerning the
implementation of the PHIS export
component will be posted on the
Agency’s Web site at www.fsis.usda.gov.
When developing, procuring,
maintaining, or using electronic and
information technology (EIT), Federal
agencies are required by Section
508(a)(1)(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (29 U.S.C. 794(d)) to ensure that
the EIT is accessible to people with
disabilities, including employees and
members of the public. The PHIS will
meet these requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Proposed Amendments
Export Applications and Certificates
The meat and poultry regulations
provide for a paper-based export
application and certification process. To
facilitate the use of the PHIS export
component, FSIS is proposing to amend
the meat and poultry regulations to
provide for the electronic submission,
approval, and issuance of export
applications and certificates. The
Agency is proposing that applications
for export certificates may be either
paper-based or electronic.
FSIS is proposing these amendments
to facilitate the electronic processing of
export applications and certificates. The
Agency is not proposing to require that
exporters submit export applications
electronically through the PHIS export
component. Under this proposed rule,
exporters would have the option to
submit export applications
electronically or continue to use the
paper-based application process. The
proposed charge for use of the electronic
system is discussed below.
FSIS meat and poultry products
inspection regulations require exporters
to apply for an export certificate and
specify that FSIS inspectors provide
poultry export certification of any
inspected and passed poultry product
‘‘upon request’’ (9 CFR 381.105(a)). The
‘‘upon request’’ certification
contemplates that an inspector will
complete the application form based on
information supplied by the poultry
exporter.
The ‘‘upon request’’ provision is
obsolete, however, and no longer
reflects poultry export application
practices. The exporter fills out most, if
not all, poultry products export
applications. In addition, the ‘‘upon
request’’ provision will not be an option
for submitting on-line export
certification applications under the
PHIS. Therefore, the Agency is
proposing to delete the phrase ‘‘upon
request’’ in 9 CFR 381.105(a). Because
exporters typically do not request that
the inspector complete the poultry
products export application, this change
in the regulations should place little, if
any, burden on exporters.
FSIS is also proposing to delete the
export certificate requirements in 9 CFR
312.8(b) and 381.106. These regulations
contain specific certificate
requirements, e.g., signature by a
program employee and bearing a
letterhead and the official seal of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture. The
Meat and Poultry Export Certificate of
Wholesomeness is an approved FSIS
Form (9060–5), generated by the Agency
and issued by FSIS inspection
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
personnel. Through FSIS Directive
9000.1, Revision 1, the Agency provides
instructions to inspection personnel
concerning the approval of export
applications (FSIS Form 9060–6) and
issuance of certificates. Therefore, FSIS
does not need to include specifications
for the export certificate and
instructions for its issuance in the
regulations.
FSIS is also proposing to amend 9
CFR 322.2 and 381.105 to delete
references to ‘‘triplicate’’ and
‘‘duplicate’’ forms. The Agency is
proposing to allow ‘‘copies’’ of the
export certificate to be distributed to the
required parties and to accompany the
product. In addition, FSIS is proposing
to delete the provisions in 9 CFR
322.2(d) for filing a copy of the export
certificate with Customs within four (4)
business days of the clearance of the
vessel at the time of filing the complete
manifest. The filing of the export
certificate with Customs is a Department
of Homeland Security, Customs and
Border Protection, requirement (19 CFR
4.75(b))and need not be included in
FSIS regulations.
FSIS is also proposing to amend the
meat and poultry export regulations to
organize and make parallel, to the extent
possible, the regulatory requirement
language for meat and poultry products.
Under the proposed rule, differences
will remain between the meat and
poultry export regulations because the
provisions for lard or similar edible
product (proposed 9 CFR 322.1(b)) do
not apply to poultry. Also, the FMIA
provides that FSIS will file one copy of
the export certificate, that one copy will
be delivered to the owner or shipper,
and that one copy will be delivered to
the chief officer of the vessel on which
the shipment shall be made (21 U.S.C.
618). Proposed 9 CFR 322.2 (c), (d), and
(e) reflect those statutory requirements.
Because the PPIA does not include such
requirements, FSIS is not proposing to
include them in this rule. Under
circumstances specified in the
regulations, exporters of meat products
may request inspection personnel to
issue certificates for export of product of
official establishments not under their
supervision (9 CFR 322.2(h)). The
poultry export regulations do not
provide for this option, but FSIS
provides for this in practice in poultry
products. Therefore, FSIS is proposing
poultry product export regulations
consistent with the meat export
regulations to reflect this practice
(proposed 9 CFR 381.106(e)).
Export Inspection Marks and Devices
As discussed above, FSIS’s
regulations require meat and poultry
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
products exporters to apply for an
export certificate. After the export
application is approved, inspection
personnel provide the export stamp and
authorize the establishment to mark
products destined for export. The serial
number on the export stamp must
correspond to the serial number on the
export certificate signed by inspection
personnel (9 CFR 312.8(a) and 381.104).
FSIS is proposing to amend 9 CFR
312.8(a) and 381.104 to provide an
alternative method of identifying and
marking containers of product destined
for export. This proposed flexibility
would permit exporters to mark product
containers with a unique identifier.
Under the proposal, the unique
identifier must link the exported
product to the export certificate issued
by inspection personnel. The Agency is
proposing this flexibility in the marking
of shipping containers because of the
technological advancements that have
been made since the export marking and
devices regulations were initially
promulgated. By providing flexibility to
the official export stamp and how it can
be applied to products, the time
between production and shipping can
be shortened, reducing the storage and
other associated costs to the industry.
Egg Products Export Regulations
As previously discussed, the EPIA
does not set forth specific provisions for
the export of egg products, and the FSIS
egg products inspection regulations do
not include requirements for exported
egg products. The egg products
inspection regulations provide that,
upon request, an inspector may issue an
egg product inspection and grading
certificate. The exporter can present the
certificate to foreign countries as
certification that egg products were
inspected and passed and are
wholesome and fit for human
consumption (9 CFR 590.402).
The EPIA authorizes FSIS to regulate
egg products for the purpose of
preventing and eliminating burdens
upon interstate and foreign commerce
(21 U.S.C. 1031). Because almost all
foreign countries require export
certification for imported egg products,
FSIS is proposing to amend the egg
products export regulations under 21
U.S.C 1043 to add export application
and certification requirements in 9 CFR
590.407, ‘‘Export certification and
marking of containers with export
inspection mark.’’ This proposed
section parallels, to the extent possible,
the export requirements in the meat and
poultry regulations that provide for the
application, certification, and marking
of product destined for export. This
proposed export certification will
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3161
provide the basic egg products export
certificate required by foreign countries.
Exporters that submit paper-based
applications for the basic egg products
export certification will not be charged
for the certificate.
FSIS is proposing to add 9 CFR
592.20(d) to provide that export
certifications that products meet
conditions or standards that are not
imposed, or that are in addition to those
imposed by the egg products
regulations, will be subject to a charge
as a reimbursable service. The proposed
provisions are consistent with the 9 CFR
350.3(b) and 362.2(b), which are
discussed in the following paragraph.
Charge for Electronic Export
Application and Certification Process
As discussed above, under the
authority of the AMA, the meat and
poultry inspection regulations provide
that when exporters request certification
that is in addition to the basic export
certification of wholesomeness required
by regulation, FSIS charges and collects
fees from establishments and facilities
that request this service (9 CFR 350.3(b),
350.7, 362.2(b), and 362.5). Exporters
request additional certifications to meet
requirement imposed by the importing
foreign countries.
The PHIS’s export component will
provide new service options to
exporters enabling them to
electronically submit, track, and manage
their export applications and
certificates. Therefore, the Agency is
proposing to charge exporters that
utilize the PHIS export component a fee
for recovering the Agency’s costs for
providing the electronic export
application and certification service.
The proposed fee is for application for
the basic export certificate. Any
additional certifications that are
imposed by the importing foreign
country will be charged as a
certification service, as provided by 9
CFR 350.3(b) and 362.2(b) for meat and
poultry products, and, as discussed
above, is proposed for egg products in
9 CFR 592.20(d). These additional
export certifications are charged at the
appropriate basetime, overtime, or
holiday rate, depending on when the
certification service is provided. The
basic export certification, if provided
outside of an inspector’s normal shift is
also charged at the appropriate rate
(overtime or holiday).
To calculate the appropriate fee for
providing the electronic export
application and certification service, the
Agency is proposing to establish the
following formula for assessing its costs:
The labor costs (i.e., direct inspection
labor cost for inspection personnel +
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
3162
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
technical support provided to users of
the export component + export library
maintenance), + the Information
Technology (IT) costs (i.e., on-going
operations + maintenance of the system
cost + eAuthentication cost), divided by
the number of export applications (see
below).
PHIS Export Application Fee:
If the FSIS adopts this proposal, it
will calculate the fee on an annual basis,
and the updated fees will apply at the
start of each calendar year. Should this
rule become final, FSIS will announce
the fee and the effective date in the
preamble of the final rule. In addition,
FSIS will publish notice of the fee,
using the formula in the final rule, in
the Federal Register approximately 30
days prior to the start of each new
calendar year.
For purposes of this proposed rule,
FSIS has calculated the fees based on
the 2012 basetime rates published on
December 23, 2011 (76 FR 80326) and
the Agency’s best estimates for on-going
operations and maintenance. FSIS has
also estimated the number of export
applications that it is likely to receive.
For the final rule and subsequent
calendar year calculations, FSIS expects
that it will obtain more precise data,
from documents and other sources, to
calculate the actual fee.
The proposed calendar year 2012
PHIS Export Application Fee is based
on the following costs, rates, and best
available data:
• Direct inspection personnel labor
costs at the 2012 basetime rate ($54.24/
hour), at an estimated 15 minutes
($54.24/4 or $13.56) per application
($13.56 * 235,121), is $3,188,204.70.
• The cost of providing technical
support, which includes service desk
support, is $500,000.
• The 2012 annual cost for funding
two full time employees (average salary)
to provide export library functions is
approximately $200,000.
• The on-going operations and
maintenance costs, including
improvements and necessary repairs to
keep the system responsive to user’s
needs, is $2,675,000.
• The cost of providing and
supporting eAuthentication, the system
for accessing the PHIS, is currently $0.
However, this cost may increase in
future years.
• The estimated number of yearly
export applications, determined using
the Agency’s Performance Based
Inspection System, is 235,121.
The calculation of the 2012 Export
Application Fee is:
Based on the above calculation, FSIS
is proposing $27.91 as the calendar year
2012 PHIS Export Application Fee.
Exporters would be charged the $27.91
fee for submitting an export application,
and the fee will be assessed regardless
of whether an export certificate is
issued.
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866. It has
been determined to be significant, but
not economically significant, under
section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 and, therefore,
has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
FSIS is proposing changes to the meat
and poultry regulations to provide for
an electronic export application and
certification system. The use of the
proposed electronic export application
system will be voluntary. FSIS is
proposing to charge exporters that
choose to utilize the system $27.91 per
application submitted. Automating the
export application and certification
process will facilitate the exportation of
U.S. meat, poultry, and egg products by
streamlining and automating the
processes that are in use while ensuring
that foreign regulatory requirements are
met. In addition, FSIS is proposing to
add export application and certification
requirements to the egg products
regulations that parallel the meat and
poultry regulations. Currently, exporters
are issued an inspection and grading
certificate.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, and
the Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
EP23JA12.001
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under the Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under this proposed
rule: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) no retroactive proceedings
will be required before parties may file
suit in court challenging this rule.
If this proposed rule is adopted, and
the cost basis does not change, the
direct cost to exporters of $27.91 per
export application would be
approximately $6.6 million per year, if
they all choose to file electronically.
The indirect costs under this proposed
rule would be the Internet service and
the acquisition of or upgrading a current
computer system to one that would be
compatible with the PHIS and meet
digital standards developed by the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology, American Standards
Institute, and the International
Organization for Standardization. These
indirect costs are indeterminable.
However, the total cost to an exporter
would depend on the number of
electronic applications processed. An
exporter that processes only a few
applications per year would not likely
EP23JA12.000
Executive Order 12988
Cost of the Proposed Action
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
experience a significant economic
impact.
There are no direct costs associated
with obtaining the Level 2
eAuthentication access needed to use
the PHIS.
Exporters that do not submit
applications electronically through the
PHIS and request export certification
that the product meets conditions or
standards that are not imposed, or that
are in addition to those imposed by
regulations, would continue to pay for
the reimbursable services (9 CFR 350.7,
362.5, and 592.500).
The total annual paperwork burden to
egg exporters to fill out the paper-based
export application is $123,333 per year
for a total of 3,333 1 hours a year. The
average exporter burden would be 16.7
hours, and $617 per exporter. There is
no annual paperwork burden to meat
and poultry exporters since they are
currently filling out the export
application.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Expected Benefits of the Proposed Rule
The proposed electronic export
application and certification system, is
expected to reduce the exporter and
inspection personnel workload and
paperwork burden by eliminating the
physical handling and processing of
applications and certificates. The
reduction in workload and paperwork
burden is based on the greater efficiency
of processing applications electronically
and the number of applications filed
electronically. Quantifiable reductions
are indeterminate at this time.
The PHIS export component
facilitates the electronic government-togovernment exchange of export
applications and certifications, which
will assist in the resolution of
allegations of fraudulent transactions,
such as false alterations and
reproductions. The PHIS is designed to
ensure authenticity, integrity, and
confidentiality. The Level 2
eAuthentication provides exporters with
the ability to conduct official electronic
transactions with the USDA through the
Internet. Exporters will be provided a
more efficient and effective application
and certification process.
An indirect benefit of automating the
export application and certification
system is that there will be an
automatic, electronic recordkeeping of
the number and types of exporters, the
types of products exported to various
countries, and the number of
applications and certificates issued.
1 Hours are derived from estimates of 200 for the
number of exporters, 100 for the number of
responses per exporter, and 10 minutes to complete
and submit an application.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
3163
electronic export applications through
the export component of PHIS. When
exporters choose to submit an
application, they will be charged
$27.91. Assuming that the number of
yearly export certificates remains at
approximately 235,121, the revenues
generated from this new fee will be
approximately $6.6 million each year.
There is no recordkeeping burden to
exporters because all transactions will
be electronically recorded, and the data
will be retrieved in real time. The
electronic export system will provide a
seamless, integrated, and streamlined
approach to processing applications and
certificates. It is expected that any
potential general problems can be
resolved electronically before the
product arrives at the port, and as a
result the products will likely move
through ports faster. Thus, storage costs
will be reduced or eliminated during the
time it would take to resolve any
application or certification issues, and
the product will reach its destination
more quickly. The cost savings of
moving products faster and reducing
storage costs are a function of the value
of the goods and the amount of the
reduction of the period of time in
storage; with higher valued goods and
greater reductions in storage period,
these cost savings will increase. The
value of goods and the reduction in
storage time are variables that are not
known to FSIS. The Agency is seeking
comments on these and other potential
benefits of the electronic export
application and certification system.
For all exporters that submit the
applications electronically, there will be
additional unquantifiable benefits
because PHIS automates the verification
of eligibility and accuracy of
certifications needed, and will speed up
the process for these establishments.
Even exporters who use the paper-based
system will benefit from the PHIS
export component. FSIS will enter the
application into the PHIS, and the FSIS
verifications activities regarding
eligibility and accuracy of certifications
will be automated. The certification will
be made per specifications of the foreign
government (e.g., paper, electronic, or
digital image).
Proposing egg product export
regulations provides the same export
requirements across all products
regulated by FSIS, and consistency in
the export application and certification
process. Currently, upon request,
inspection and grading certificates are
issued for exported egg products. This
proposed rule provides the exported egg
products certification that is required by
most foreign countries. Consistent
export requirements for meat, poultry,
and egg products increase
administrative efficiency, provide
clarity, and allow egg products
exporters to benefit from the new
electronic export certification system.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The FSIS Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule
would not have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601). The proposed
changes will affect those entities in the
United States that export meat, poultry,
and egg products to foreign countries.
There are 6,099 meat and poultry
establishments that could possibly be
affected by this proposed rule since all
are eligible to export. Of this number,
there are about 2,616 small federally
inspected establishments (with more
than 10 but less than 500 employees)
and 3,103 very small establishments
(with fewer than 10 employees) based
on HACCP Classification.2 Therefore, a
total of 5,719 small and very small
establishments could be possibly
affected by this rule.
For the meat and poultry industries,
small and very small exporters, like
large exporters, would incur the $27.91
fee only if they file their export
application electronically. If they
choose to submit the paper application,
they will bear no additional cost
compared to now. If exporters submit
their applications electronically, the
average annual cost from this rule
would be $1,075.95 per exporter
(235,121 export applications per year/
6,099 meat and poultry establishments *
$27.91 per application). For egg product
exporters, FSIS expects the number of
applications submitted to be 20,000.3
Using the $27.91 fee, the cost per
exporter would be $2,791. If small
establishments require fewer
applications, then the cost per small
establishment is even lower. Therefore,
the Agency believes that the proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
In making its determination, the
Agency considered two alternatives: (1)
The status quo (only paper-based export
applications) and (2) require exporters
to submit electronic export applications
and charge an application fee for the
service. The status quo alternative was
FSIS Budgetary Effects
FSIS cannot predict how many
exporters will choose to submit
2 Establishment numbers from FSIS’s
Performance Based Inspection System, June 2011.
3 See Footnote 1, page 21.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
rejected, because electronic export
applications are necessary to implement
the PHIS export component. Without
the electronic export application
alternative, exporters will not reap the
benefits of the PHIS’s export
component.
The second alternative, to make the
electronic export application mandatory
and charging a fee, was rejected because
export certificates are a regulatory
requirement, and the paper-based
application process (at no charge) must
be available to exporters. The proposed
rule would provide for both the paperbased and electronic export application
process, which will minimize the
impact on small entities because it will
allow them, as well as other exporters,
to continue using the paper-based
application process. To make electronic
export applications mandatory would
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
because the $27.91 fee would increase
the cost of exporting and may be a
disadvantage to small entities because
they will not have the option to
continue to submit paper-based
applications. However, small entities
may choose to utilize the electronic
system because it offers the ability to
electronically track and manage the
application and certification process.
The $27.91 fee would have to be
absorbed by the small entities or passed
along to their customers, which could
negatively impact their bottom line if a
large percentage of their business is
exports because they are priced out of
the market.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that minorities, women, and
persons with disabilities are aware of
this proposed rule, FSIS will announce
it online through the FSIS Web page
located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations_&_policies/Proposed_Rules/
index.asp.
FSIS will also make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is
communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for
industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
available on the FSIS Web page.
Through the Listserv and Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader and more diverse
audience. In addition, FSIS offers an
electronic mail subscription service
which provides automatic and
customized access to selected food
safety news and information. This
service is available at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/
email_subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves, and
have the option to password protect
their accounts.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(j) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection requirements included in this
proposed rule (for egg products on the
Application for Export Certificate, FSIS
Form 9060–6) have been submitted for
approval to OMB as part of the Public
Health Information System (PHIS)
information collection request.
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to
achieving the purposes of the EGovernment Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et
seq.) by, among other things, promoting
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies and providing
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
To file a written complaint of
discrimination, write USDA, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call
(202) 720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA
is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
List of Subjects
9 CFR Part 312
Official Marks, Devices and
Certificates.
9 CFR Part 322
Exports.
9 CFR Part 350
Special Services Relating to Meat and
Other Products.
9 CFR Part 362
Voluntary Poultry Inspection
Regulations.
9 CFR Part 381
Poultry Products Inspection
Regulations.
9 CFR Part 590
Inspection of Eggs and Egg Products
(Egg Products Inspection Act).
9 CFR Part 592
Voluntary Inspection of Egg Products.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, FSIS proposes to amend 9
CFR chapter III as follows:
PART 312—OFFICIAL MARKS,
DEVICES AND CERTIFICATES
1. The authority citation for Part 312
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601–695; 7 CFR 2.17,
2.55.
2. Revise § 312.8 to read as follows:
§ 312.8
Export inspection marks.
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
The export inspection mark required
in § 322.1 must be either a mark that
contains a unique identifier that
corresponds to the export certificate or
an official mark with the following
form: 1
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, gender,
religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family
status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s Target Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and TTY).
1 The number ‘‘529893’’ is given as an example
only. The number on the mark will correspond to
the export certificate.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
EP23JA12.002
3164
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
3. The authority citation for Part 322
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601–695; 7 CFR 2.17,
2.55.
4. Revise § 322.1 to read as follows:
§ 322.1
Marking products for export.
(a) When authorized by inspection
personnel, establishments must mark
the outside container of any inspected
and passed product for export, except
ship stores, small quantities exclusively
for the personal use of the consignee
and not for sale or distribution, and
shipments by and for the U.S. Armed
Forces, with an export inspection mark
as shown in § 312.8 of this subchapter.
(b) When authorized by inspection
personnel, establishments must mark
each tank car of inspected and passed
lard or similar edible product, and each
door of each railroad car or other closed
means of conveyance, containing
inspected and passed loose product
shipped directly to a foreign country,
with an export inspection mark as
shown in § 312.8 of this subchapter.
5. Revise § 322.2 to read as follows:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 322.2
Export certification.
(a) Exporters must apply for export
certification of inspected and passed
products shipped to any foreign
country. Exporters may apply for an
export certificate using a paper or
electronic application. FSIS will assess
exporters that submit an electronic
application the charge in § 350.7(e).
(b) FSIS will issue only one certificate
for each consignment, except in the case
of error in the certificate or loss of the
certificate originally issued. A request
for a replacement or an in lieu of paper
certificate, except in the case of a lost
certificate, must be accompanied by the
original paper certificate. The new
certificate will carry the following
statement: ‘‘Issued in lieu of ____’’, with
the numbers of the certificates that have
been superseded.
(c) FSIS will deliver a copy of the
certificate to the shipper or exporter.
The shipper or exporter may furnish the
copy of the certificate to the consignee
for purposes of affecting the entry of
product into the foreign country of
destination.
(d) The shipper or exporter must
deliver a copy of the certificate to the
agent of the railroad or other carrier that
transports the consignment from the
United States otherwise than by water,
or to the chief officer of the vessel on
which the export shipment is made, or
to the vessel’s agent. The copy must be
used only by such carrier and only for
the purpose of affecting the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
transportation of the consignment
certified.
(e) FSIS will retain a copy of the
certificate.
(f) Exporters may request inspection
personnel to issue certificates for export
consignments of product of official
establishments not under their
supervision, provided the consignments
are first identified as having been ‘‘U.S.
inspected and passed,’’ are found to be
neither adulterated nor misbranded, and
are marked as required by § 322.1.
PART 350—SPECIAL SERVICES
RELATING TO MEAT AND OTHER
PRODUCTS
6. The authority citation for Part 350
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624; 7 CFR
2.17, 2.55.
7. In § 350.7 add paragraphs (e), (f),
and (g) to read as follows:
§ 350.7
eAuthentication Cost), divided by the
number of export applications.
(g) FSIS will publish notice of the
electronic export certificate application
fee annually in the Federal Register.
PART 381—POULTRY PRODUCTS
INSPECTION REGULATIONS
10. The authority citation for Part 381
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138F, 450, 21 U.S.C.,
451–470, 7 CFR 2.7, 2.18, 2.53.
11. Revise § 381.104 to read as
follows:
§ 381.104
Export inspection marks.
The export inspection mark required
in § 381.105 must be either a mark that
contains a unique identifier that
corresponds to the export certificate or
an official mark with the following
form: 1
Fees and Charges.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Exporters that submit electronic
export certificate applications will be
charged a fee per application submitted.
(f) For each calendar year, FSIS will
calculate the electronic export
certificate application fee, using the
following formula: Labor Costs (Direct
Inspection Labor Cost + Technical
Support Cost + Export Library
Maintenance Cost) + Information
Technology Costs (On-going operations
Cost + Maintenance Cost +
eAuthentication Cost), divided by the
number of export applications.
(g) FSIS will publish notice of the
electronic export certificate application
fee annually in the Federal Register.
PART 362—VOLUNTARY POULTRY
INSPECTION REGULATIONS
8. The authority citation for part 362
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C 1622; 7 CFR 2.18(g)
and (i) and 2.53.
9. In § 362.5, add paragraphs(e), (f),
and (g) to read as follows:
§ 362.5
Fees and charges.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Exporters that submit electronic
export certificate applications will be
charged a fee per application submitted.
(f) For each calendar year, FSIS will
calculate the electronic export
certificate application fee, using the
following formula: Labor Costs (Direct
Inspection Labor Cost + Technical
Support Cost + Export Library
Maintenance Cost) + Information
Technology Costs (On-going operations
Cost + Maintenance Cost +
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12. Revise § 381.105 to read as
follows:
§ 381.105
Marking products for export.
When authorized by inspection
personnel, establishments must mark
the outside container of any inspected
and passed product for export, except
ship stores, small quantities exclusively
for the personal use of the consignee
and not for sale or distribution, and
shipments by and for the U.S. Armed
Forces, with an export inspection mark
as shown in § 381.104 of this
subchapter.
13. Revise § 381.106 to read as
follows:
§ 381.106
Export certification.
(a) Exporters must apply for export
certification of inspected and passed
products to any foreign country.
Exporters may apply for an export
certificate using a paper or electronic
application. FSIS will assess exporters
that submit an electronic application the
charge in § 362.5(e).
(b) FSIS will issue only one certificate
for each consignment, except in the case
of error in the certificate or loss of the
certificate originally issued. A request
1 The number ‘‘529893’’ is given as an example
only. The number on the mark will correspond to
the export certificate.
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
EP23JA12.003
PART 322—EXPORTS
3165
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules
for a replacement or in lieu of paper
certificate, except in the case of a lost
certificate, must be accompanied by the
original paper certificate. The new
certificate will carry the following
statement: ‘‘Issued in lieu of ____’’, with
the numbers of the certificates that have
been superseded.
(c) FSIS will deliver a copy of the
certificate to the person who requested
such certificate or his agent. Such
persons may duplicate the certificate as
required in connection with the
exportation of the product.
(d) FSIS will retain a copy of the
certificate.
(e) Exporters may request inspection
personnel to issue certificates for export
consignments of product of official
establishments not under their
supervision, provided the consignments
are first identified as having been ‘‘U.S.
inspected and passed,’’ are found to be
neither adulterated nor misbranded, and
are marked as required by § 381.105.
PART 590—INSPECTION OF EGGS
AND EGG PRODUCTS (EGG
PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT)
14. The authority citation for Part 590
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031–1056.
15. Add § 590.407 to read as follows:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 590.407 Export certification and marking
of containers with export inspection mark.
(a) Exporters must apply for export
certification of inspected and passed
products shipped to any foreign
country. Exporters may apply for an
export certificate using a paper or
electronic application. FSIS will assess
exporters that submit an electronic
application the charge in § 592.500(d).
(b) FSIS will issue only one certificate
for each consignment, except in the case
of error in the certificate or loss of the
certificate originally issued. A request
for a replacement or in lieu of paper
certificate, except in the case of a lost
certificate, must be accompanied by the
original paper certificate. The new
certificate will carry the following
statement: ‘‘Issued in lieu of ____’’, with
the numbers of the certificates that have
been superseded.
(c) FSIS will deliver a copy of the
export certificate to the person who
requested such certificate or his agent.
Such persons may duplicate the
certificate as required in connection
with the exportation of the product.
(d) FSIS will retain a copy of the
certificate.
(e) When authorized by inspection
personnel, establishments must mark
the outside container of any inspected
and passed egg products destined for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
export, except ship stores, small
quantities exclusively for the personal
use of the consignee and not for sale or
distribution, and shipments by and for
the U.S. Armed Forces, with a mark that
contains a unique identifier that
corresponds to the export certificate or
an export inspection mark with the
following form:1
(f) Exporters may request inspection
personnel to issue certificates for export
consignments of product of official
establishments not under their
supervision, provided the consignments
are first identified as having been ‘‘U.S.
inspected and passed,’’ are found to be
neither adulterated nor misbranded, and
are marked as required by paragraph (e)
of this section.
PART 592—VOLUNTARY INSPECTION
OF EGG PRODUCTS
16. The authority citation for Part 592
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Payment of fees and charges.
(a) Fees and charges for voluntary
base time rate, overtime inspection
service, holiday inspection service, and
electronic export applications shall be
paid by the interested party making the
application for such service, in
accordance with the applicable
provisions of this section and § 592.510
through § 592.530, both inclusive. If so
1 The number ‘‘529893’’ is given as an example
only. The number on the export certificate will
correspond to the export certificate.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Done at Washington, DC, on January 11,
2012.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–1158 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 325, Subpart C
RIN 3064–AD91
Annual Stress Test
17. In § 592.20 add paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Export certification. Upon
application, by any person intending to
export any egg product, inspectors may
make certifications regarding products
for human food purposes, to be
exported, as meeting conditions or
standards that are not imposed or are in
addition to those imposed by the
regulations in the part and the laws
under which such regulations were
issued.
17. Revise § 592.500 paragraph (a) and
add paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) as
follows:
§ 592.500
required by the inspection personnel,
such fees and charges shall be paid in
advance.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Exporters that submit electronic
export certificate applications will be
charged a fee per application submitted.
(e) For each calendar year, FSIS will
calculate the electronic export
certificate application fee, using the
following formula: Labor Costs (Direct
Inspection Labor Cost + Technical
Support Cost + Export Library
Maintenance Cost) + Information
Technology Costs (On-going operations
Cost + Maintenance Cost +
eAuthentication Cost), divided by the
number of export applications.
(f) FSIS will publish notice of the
electronic export certificate application
fee annually in the Federal Register.
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
public comment.
AGENCY:
The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the
‘‘Corporation’’ or ‘‘FDIC’’) requests
comment on this proposed rule that
implements the requirements in Section
165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(the ‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’) regarding stress
tests (‘‘proposed rule’’). This proposed
rule would implement section 165(i)(2)
by requiring state nonmember banks
and state savings associations
supervised by the Corporation with total
consolidated assets of more than $10
billion to conduct annual stress tests in
accordance with the proposed rule,
report the results of such stress tests to
the Corporation and the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (‘‘Board’’) at such time and in
such a form containing the information
required by the Corporation, and
publish a summary of the results of the
required stress tests.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before March 23, 2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
EP23JA12.004
3166
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3159-3166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1158]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3159]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 312, 322, 350, 362, 381, 590, and 592
[Docket No. FSIS-2009-0026]
RIN 0583-AD41
Electronic Export Application and Certification Charge;
Flexibility in the Requirements for Export Inspection Marks, Devices,
and Certificates; Egg Products Export Certification
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is proposing to
amend the meat and poultry inspection regulations to provide for an
electronic export application and certification system. The electronic
export application and certification system will be a component of the
Agency's Public Health Information System (PHIS). The export component
of PHIS will be available as an alternative to the paper-based
application and certification process. FSIS is proposing to charge
users for the use of the proposed system. FSIS is proposing to
establish a formula for calculating the fee. FSIS intends to publish
notice of the fee, using the formula, in the Federal Register on an
annual basis. FSIS is also proposing to provide flexibility in the
requirements for official export inspection marks, devices, and
certificates. In addition, FSIS is proposing to amend the egg product
export regulations that parallel the meat and poultry product export
regulations.
DATES: Submit comments on or before March 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be submitted by either of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: This Web site provides the
ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this
Web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Mail, including floppy disks or CD-ROMs, and hand- or
courier-delivered items: Send to Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), FSIS, Patriots Plaza 3, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Room 8-163A, Mailstop 3782, Washington, DC 20250-3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by mail or electronic mail must
include the Agency name and docket number FSIS-2009-0026. Comments
received in response to this docket will be made available for public
inspection and posted without change, including any personal
information, to https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to background documents or comments received, go
to the FSIS Docket Room at the address listed above between 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ron Jones, Assistant
Administrator, Office of International Affairs, FSIS, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 3143, Washington, DC
20250-3700, (202) 720-3473.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601-695) and the
Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451-470) provide for
the export and certification of meat and poultry products. The Federal
meat and poultry products inspection regulations require exporters to
apply for official export certificates to ship federally inspected and
passed meat and poultry products to foreign countries (9 CFR 322.2 and
381.105). The Federal meat and poultry products inspection regulations
also contain specific requirements for the official marking of exported
products, for the devices for marking shipping containers, and for the
official export certificate (9 CFR 312.8, 322.1, 322.2, 381.104,
381.105, and 381.106).
The Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) provides the Secretary of
Agriculture with the authority to collect fees ``as will be reasonable
and as nearly as may be to cover the cost of the service rendered, to
the end that agricultural products may be marketed to the best
advantage, that trading may be facilitated, and that consumers may be
able to obtain the quality product which they desire'' (7 U.S.C
1622(h)).
Under the authority of the AMA, the meat and poultry regulations
provide that FSIS may make certifications regarding exported meat and
poultry products meeting conditions or standards that are not imposed,
or that are in addition to those imposed, by the meat and poultry
regulations, the FMIA, or the PPIA. Under 9 CFR 350.3(b), 350.7,
362.2(b), and 362.5, FSIS collects fees from establishments and
facilities that request certification service that is in addition to
the basic export certification of wholesomeness. FSIS is now proposing
to establish a fee for utilizing a new electronic export application
and certification system. The system will be a service FSIS will
provide to exporters that will enable them to submit, track, and manage
export applications and certificates more efficiently and effectively
than is possible under the current system.
The Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) (21 U.S.C. 1031-1056) does
not set forth specific provisions for the export of egg products, and
FSIS's egg products inspection regulations do not include requirements
for exported egg products. As discussed below, FSIS is proposing egg
products regulations to parallel the meat and poultry requirements,
including a provision for inspectors to make certifications that egg
products for export meet conditions or standards that are not imposed,
or that are in addition to those that may be imposed, by the egg
products regulations under the EPIA.
Export Application and Certification Process
Under 9 CFR 322.2(a) and 381.105(a), exporters of meat and poultry
products may apply for an export certificate. The Application for
Export Certificate (FSIS Form 9060-6) is available from inspection
personnel, or exporters can submit a computer-generated (paper) copy.
The poultry products regulations, in addition to requiring an
application for an export certificate, provide for an ``upon request''
certification. The ``upon
[[Page 3160]]
request'' certification provides that an inspector will complete the
application based on information supplied by the poultry exporter.
FSIS inspection personnel review the completed export application
to verify that the information is correct and that it is signed. After
inspection personnel reinspect product that is intended for export (9
CFR 322.2 and 381.105), they sign the application certifying that the
product was examined in accordance with Agency policy.
As provided in 9 CFR 322.1(a) and 381.105(a), each shipping
container is marked with the official export stamp bearing the serial
number on the export certificate. Both 9 CFR 312.8(a) and 381.104
provide for an official device to apply the official export stamp.
After the export application has been signed, inspection personnel
provide the establishment with the official export stamp to mark
product destined for export. After the shipping containers are marked,
inspection personnel secure the stamp and sign the completed Meat and
Poultry Export Certificate of Wholesomeness (FSIS Form 9060-5). The
Meat and Poultry Export Certificate of Wholesomeness provides
certification that the meat or poultry product originated from animals
that received ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection and were found to
be wholesome and fit for human consumption.
Both 9 CFR 312.8 and 381.106 provide that the export certificate is
a paper certificate form for signature by a program employee or
inspector, bearing a letterhead and the seal of the United States
Department of Agriculture, and a serial number.
The regulations also require that the export certificate be issued
in triplicate for meat products and in duplicate for poultry products.
The meat and poultry products inspection regulations include specific
requirements for where and to whom the original, duplicate, and
triplicate are to be distributed (9 CFR 322.2 (d), (e), and (f), and
381.105(b) and (c)).
The Public Health Information System (PHIS)
FSIS is implementing the Public Health Information System (PHIS), a
computerized, Web-based inspection information system. The PHIS will
integrate and automate the Agency's paper-based business processes into
one comprehensive and fully automated data-driven inspection system.
The PHIS will significantly improve the Agency's efforts to collect,
consolidate, and analyze data in order to improve public health. The
PHIS includes an export component that will streamline and automate the
export application and certification process.
The PHIS export component will enable exporters to electronically
submit, track, and manage export applications and certificates. For
example, exporters will be able to access their online account to
submit applications, delay the issuance of a certificate, cancel
pending applications and certificates, and apply for replacement or
``in lieu of'' certificates. Exporters that submit paper applications
will not be able to submit, track, or manage their applications and
certificates in this manner. FSIS inspection personnel will be able to
access the PHIS to electronically approve export applications and
certificates.
FSIS will consider any data and the electronic records
(applications and certifications) submitted and processed through the
PHIS equivalent to paper records. Export certifications transmitted
electronically are official.
To access and use the PHIS export component, exporters will need to
register for an USDA eAuthentication account with Level 2 access. An
eAuthentication account enables individuals within and outside of the
USDA to obtain user-identification accounts to access a wide range of
USDA applications through the Internet. The Level 2 access will provide
users the ability to conduct official electronic business transactions.
To register for a Level 2 eAuthentication account, the user will need
to have access to the Internet and a valid email address. To learn more
about eAuthentication and how to register for an account, visit https://www.eauth.egov.usda.gov/.
The Agency plans to provide exporters with more specific, detailed
information on how to access the PHIS to submit export applications and
manage export certificates. The Agency intends to provide exporters
with assistance and technical support in obtaining Level 2
eAuthentication access and in accessing and navigating the PHIS export
component. Any information concerning the implementation of the PHIS
export component will be posted on the Agency's Web site at
www.fsis.usda.gov.
When developing, procuring, maintaining, or using electronic and
information technology (EIT), Federal agencies are required by Section
508(a)(1)(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794(d)) to
ensure that the EIT is accessible to people with disabilities,
including employees and members of the public. The PHIS will meet these
requirements.
Proposed Amendments
Export Applications and Certificates
The meat and poultry regulations provide for a paper-based export
application and certification process. To facilitate the use of the
PHIS export component, FSIS is proposing to amend the meat and poultry
regulations to provide for the electronic submission, approval, and
issuance of export applications and certificates. The Agency is
proposing that applications for export certificates may be either
paper-based or electronic.
FSIS is proposing these amendments to facilitate the electronic
processing of export applications and certificates. The Agency is not
proposing to require that exporters submit export applications
electronically through the PHIS export component. Under this proposed
rule, exporters would have the option to submit export applications
electronically or continue to use the paper-based application process.
The proposed charge for use of the electronic system is discussed
below.
FSIS meat and poultry products inspection regulations require
exporters to apply for an export certificate and specify that FSIS
inspectors provide poultry export certification of any inspected and
passed poultry product ``upon request'' (9 CFR 381.105(a)). The ``upon
request'' certification contemplates that an inspector will complete
the application form based on information supplied by the poultry
exporter.
The ``upon request'' provision is obsolete, however, and no longer
reflects poultry export application practices. The exporter fills out
most, if not all, poultry products export applications. In addition,
the ``upon request'' provision will not be an option for submitting on-
line export certification applications under the PHIS. Therefore, the
Agency is proposing to delete the phrase ``upon request'' in 9 CFR
381.105(a). Because exporters typically do not request that the
inspector complete the poultry products export application, this change
in the regulations should place little, if any, burden on exporters.
FSIS is also proposing to delete the export certificate
requirements in 9 CFR 312.8(b) and 381.106. These regulations contain
specific certificate requirements, e.g., signature by a program
employee and bearing a letterhead and the official seal of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture. The Meat and Poultry Export Certificate of
Wholesomeness is an approved FSIS Form (9060-5), generated by the
Agency and issued by FSIS inspection
[[Page 3161]]
personnel. Through FSIS Directive 9000.1, Revision 1, the Agency
provides instructions to inspection personnel concerning the approval
of export applications (FSIS Form 9060-6) and issuance of certificates.
Therefore, FSIS does not need to include specifications for the export
certificate and instructions for its issuance in the regulations.
FSIS is also proposing to amend 9 CFR 322.2 and 381.105 to delete
references to ``triplicate'' and ``duplicate'' forms. The Agency is
proposing to allow ``copies'' of the export certificate to be
distributed to the required parties and to accompany the product. In
addition, FSIS is proposing to delete the provisions in 9 CFR 322.2(d)
for filing a copy of the export certificate with Customs within four
(4) business days of the clearance of the vessel at the time of filing
the complete manifest. The filing of the export certificate with
Customs is a Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border
Protection, requirement (19 CFR 4.75(b))and need not be included in
FSIS regulations.
FSIS is also proposing to amend the meat and poultry export
regulations to organize and make parallel, to the extent possible, the
regulatory requirement language for meat and poultry products. Under
the proposed rule, differences will remain between the meat and poultry
export regulations because the provisions for lard or similar edible
product (proposed 9 CFR 322.1(b)) do not apply to poultry. Also, the
FMIA provides that FSIS will file one copy of the export certificate,
that one copy will be delivered to the owner or shipper, and that one
copy will be delivered to the chief officer of the vessel on which the
shipment shall be made (21 U.S.C. 618). Proposed 9 CFR 322.2 (c), (d),
and (e) reflect those statutory requirements. Because the PPIA does not
include such requirements, FSIS is not proposing to include them in
this rule. Under circumstances specified in the regulations, exporters
of meat products may request inspection personnel to issue certificates
for export of product of official establishments not under their
supervision (9 CFR 322.2(h)). The poultry export regulations do not
provide for this option, but FSIS provides for this in practice in
poultry products. Therefore, FSIS is proposing poultry product export
regulations consistent with the meat export regulations to reflect this
practice (proposed 9 CFR 381.106(e)).
Export Inspection Marks and Devices
As discussed above, FSIS's regulations require meat and poultry
products exporters to apply for an export certificate. After the export
application is approved, inspection personnel provide the export stamp
and authorize the establishment to mark products destined for export.
The serial number on the export stamp must correspond to the serial
number on the export certificate signed by inspection personnel (9 CFR
312.8(a) and 381.104).
FSIS is proposing to amend 9 CFR 312.8(a) and 381.104 to provide an
alternative method of identifying and marking containers of product
destined for export. This proposed flexibility would permit exporters
to mark product containers with a unique identifier. Under the
proposal, the unique identifier must link the exported product to the
export certificate issued by inspection personnel. The Agency is
proposing this flexibility in the marking of shipping containers
because of the technological advancements that have been made since the
export marking and devices regulations were initially promulgated. By
providing flexibility to the official export stamp and how it can be
applied to products, the time between production and shipping can be
shortened, reducing the storage and other associated costs to the
industry.
Egg Products Export Regulations
As previously discussed, the EPIA does not set forth specific
provisions for the export of egg products, and the FSIS egg products
inspection regulations do not include requirements for exported egg
products. The egg products inspection regulations provide that, upon
request, an inspector may issue an egg product inspection and grading
certificate. The exporter can present the certificate to foreign
countries as certification that egg products were inspected and passed
and are wholesome and fit for human consumption (9 CFR 590.402).
The EPIA authorizes FSIS to regulate egg products for the purpose
of preventing and eliminating burdens upon interstate and foreign
commerce (21 U.S.C. 1031). Because almost all foreign countries require
export certification for imported egg products, FSIS is proposing to
amend the egg products export regulations under 21 U.S.C 1043 to add
export application and certification requirements in 9 CFR 590.407,
``Export certification and marking of containers with export inspection
mark.'' This proposed section parallels, to the extent possible, the
export requirements in the meat and poultry regulations that provide
for the application, certification, and marking of product destined for
export. This proposed export certification will provide the basic egg
products export certificate required by foreign countries. Exporters
that submit paper-based applications for the basic egg products export
certification will not be charged for the certificate.
FSIS is proposing to add 9 CFR 592.20(d) to provide that export
certifications that products meet conditions or standards that are not
imposed, or that are in addition to those imposed by the egg products
regulations, will be subject to a charge as a reimbursable service. The
proposed provisions are consistent with the 9 CFR 350.3(b) and
362.2(b), which are discussed in the following paragraph.
Charge for Electronic Export Application and Certification Process
As discussed above, under the authority of the AMA, the meat and
poultry inspection regulations provide that when exporters request
certification that is in addition to the basic export certification of
wholesomeness required by regulation, FSIS charges and collects fees
from establishments and facilities that request this service (9 CFR
350.3(b), 350.7, 362.2(b), and 362.5). Exporters request additional
certifications to meet requirement imposed by the importing foreign
countries.
The PHIS's export component will provide new service options to
exporters enabling them to electronically submit, track, and manage
their export applications and certificates. Therefore, the Agency is
proposing to charge exporters that utilize the PHIS export component a
fee for recovering the Agency's costs for providing the electronic
export application and certification service. The proposed fee is for
application for the basic export certificate. Any additional
certifications that are imposed by the importing foreign country will
be charged as a certification service, as provided by 9 CFR 350.3(b)
and 362.2(b) for meat and poultry products, and, as discussed above, is
proposed for egg products in 9 CFR 592.20(d). These additional export
certifications are charged at the appropriate basetime, overtime, or
holiday rate, depending on when the certification service is provided.
The basic export certification, if provided outside of an inspector's
normal shift is also charged at the appropriate rate (overtime or
holiday).
To calculate the appropriate fee for providing the electronic
export application and certification service, the Agency is proposing
to establish the following formula for assessing its costs: The labor
costs (i.e., direct inspection labor cost for inspection personnel +
[[Page 3162]]
technical support provided to users of the export component + export
library maintenance), + the Information Technology (IT) costs (i.e.,
on-going operations + maintenance of the system cost + eAuthentication
cost), divided by the number of export applications (see below).
PHIS Export Application Fee:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JA12.000
If the FSIS adopts this proposal, it will calculate the fee on an
annual basis, and the updated fees will apply at the start of each
calendar year. Should this rule become final, FSIS will announce the
fee and the effective date in the preamble of the final rule. In
addition, FSIS will publish notice of the fee, using the formula in the
final rule, in the Federal Register approximately 30 days prior to the
start of each new calendar year.
For purposes of this proposed rule, FSIS has calculated the fees
based on the 2012 basetime rates published on December 23, 2011 (76 FR
80326) and the Agency's best estimates for on-going operations and
maintenance. FSIS has also estimated the number of export applications
that it is likely to receive. For the final rule and subsequent
calendar year calculations, FSIS expects that it will obtain more
precise data, from documents and other sources, to calculate the actual
fee.
The proposed calendar year 2012 PHIS Export Application Fee is
based on the following costs, rates, and best available data:
Direct inspection personnel labor costs at the 2012
basetime rate ($54.24/hour), at an estimated 15 minutes ($54.24/4 or
$13.56) per application ($13.56 * 235,121), is $3,188,204.70.
The cost of providing technical support, which includes
service desk support, is $500,000.
The 2012 annual cost for funding two full time employees
(average salary) to provide export library functions is approximately
$200,000.
The on-going operations and maintenance costs, including
improvements and necessary repairs to keep the system responsive to
user's needs, is $2,675,000.
The cost of providing and supporting eAuthentication, the
system for accessing the PHIS, is currently $0. However, this cost may
increase in future years.
The estimated number of yearly export applications,
determined using the Agency's Performance Based Inspection System, is
235,121.
The calculation of the 2012 Export Application Fee is:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JA12.001
Based on the above calculation, FSIS is proposing $27.91 as the
calendar year 2012 PHIS Export Application Fee. Exporters would be
charged the $27.91 fee for submitting an export application, and the
fee will be assessed regardless of whether an export certificate is
issued.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under the Executive Order
12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under this proposed rule: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) no retroactive proceedings will be required before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order
(E.O.) 12866. It has been determined to be significant, but not
economically significant, under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 and,
therefore, has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
FSIS is proposing changes to the meat and poultry regulations to
provide for an electronic export application and certification system.
The use of the proposed electronic export application system will be
voluntary. FSIS is proposing to charge exporters that choose to utilize
the system $27.91 per application submitted. Automating the export
application and certification process will facilitate the exportation
of U.S. meat, poultry, and egg products by streamlining and automating
the processes that are in use while ensuring that foreign regulatory
requirements are met. In addition, FSIS is proposing to add export
application and certification requirements to the egg products
regulations that parallel the meat and poultry regulations. Currently,
exporters are issued an inspection and grading certificate.
Cost of the Proposed Action
If this proposed rule is adopted, and the cost basis does not
change, the direct cost to exporters of $27.91 per export application
would be approximately $6.6 million per year, if they all choose to
file electronically. The indirect costs under this proposed rule would
be the Internet service and the acquisition of or upgrading a current
computer system to one that would be compatible with the PHIS and meet
digital standards developed by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, American Standards Institute, and the International
Organization for Standardization. These indirect costs are
indeterminable. However, the total cost to an exporter would depend on
the number of electronic applications processed. An exporter that
processes only a few applications per year would not likely
[[Page 3163]]
experience a significant economic impact.
There are no direct costs associated with obtaining the Level 2
eAuthentication access needed to use the PHIS.
Exporters that do not submit applications electronically through
the PHIS and request export certification that the product meets
conditions or standards that are not imposed, or that are in addition
to those imposed by regulations, would continue to pay for the
reimbursable services (9 CFR 350.7, 362.5, and 592.500).
The total annual paperwork burden to egg exporters to fill out the
paper-based export application is $123,333 per year for a total of
3,333 \1\ hours a year. The average exporter burden would be 16.7
hours, and $617 per exporter. There is no annual paperwork burden to
meat and poultry exporters since they are currently filling out the
export application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Hours are derived from estimates of 200 for the number of
exporters, 100 for the number of responses per exporter, and 10
minutes to complete and submit an application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected Benefits of the Proposed Rule
The proposed electronic export application and certification
system, is expected to reduce the exporter and inspection personnel
workload and paperwork burden by eliminating the physical handling and
processing of applications and certificates. The reduction in workload
and paperwork burden is based on the greater efficiency of processing
applications electronically and the number of applications filed
electronically. Quantifiable reductions are indeterminate at this time.
The PHIS export component facilitates the electronic government-to-
government exchange of export applications and certifications, which
will assist in the resolution of allegations of fraudulent
transactions, such as false alterations and reproductions. The PHIS is
designed to ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality. The
Level 2 eAuthentication provides exporters with the ability to conduct
official electronic transactions with the USDA through the Internet.
Exporters will be provided a more efficient and effective application
and certification process.
An indirect benefit of automating the export application and
certification system is that there will be an automatic, electronic
recordkeeping of the number and types of exporters, the types of
products exported to various countries, and the number of applications
and certificates issued. There is no recordkeeping burden to exporters
because all transactions will be electronically recorded, and the data
will be retrieved in real time. The electronic export system will
provide a seamless, integrated, and streamlined approach to processing
applications and certificates. It is expected that any potential
general problems can be resolved electronically before the product
arrives at the port, and as a result the products will likely move
through ports faster. Thus, storage costs will be reduced or eliminated
during the time it would take to resolve any application or
certification issues, and the product will reach its destination more
quickly. The cost savings of moving products faster and reducing
storage costs are a function of the value of the goods and the amount
of the reduction of the period of time in storage; with higher valued
goods and greater reductions in storage period, these cost savings will
increase. The value of goods and the reduction in storage time are
variables that are not known to FSIS. The Agency is seeking comments on
these and other potential benefits of the electronic export application
and certification system.
For all exporters that submit the applications electronically,
there will be additional unquantifiable benefits because PHIS automates
the verification of eligibility and accuracy of certifications needed,
and will speed up the process for these establishments. Even exporters
who use the paper-based system will benefit from the PHIS export
component. FSIS will enter the application into the PHIS, and the FSIS
verifications activities regarding eligibility and accuracy of
certifications will be automated. The certification will be made per
specifications of the foreign government (e.g., paper, electronic, or
digital image).
Proposing egg product export regulations provides the same export
requirements across all products regulated by FSIS, and consistency in
the export application and certification process. Currently, upon
request, inspection and grading certificates are issued for exported
egg products. This proposed rule provides the exported egg products
certification that is required by most foreign countries. Consistent
export requirements for meat, poultry, and egg products increase
administrative efficiency, provide clarity, and allow egg products
exporters to benefit from the new electronic export certification
system.
FSIS Budgetary Effects
FSIS cannot predict how many exporters will choose to submit
electronic export applications through the export component of PHIS.
When exporters choose to submit an application, they will be charged
$27.91. Assuming that the number of yearly export certificates remains
at approximately 235,121, the revenues generated from this new fee will
be approximately $6.6 million each year.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The FSIS Administrator has determined that this proposed rule would
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities, as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601).
The proposed changes will affect those entities in the United States
that export meat, poultry, and egg products to foreign countries. There
are 6,099 meat and poultry establishments that could possibly be
affected by this proposed rule since all are eligible to export. Of
this number, there are about 2,616 small federally inspected
establishments (with more than 10 but less than 500 employees) and
3,103 very small establishments (with fewer than 10 employees) based on
HACCP Classification.\2\ Therefore, a total of 5,719 small and very
small establishments could be possibly affected by this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Establishment numbers from FSIS's Performance Based
Inspection System, June 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the meat and poultry industries, small and very small
exporters, like large exporters, would incur the $27.91 fee only if
they file their export application electronically. If they choose to
submit the paper application, they will bear no additional cost
compared to now. If exporters submit their applications electronically,
the average annual cost from this rule would be $1,075.95 per exporter
(235,121 export applications per year/6,099 meat and poultry
establishments * $27.91 per application). For egg product exporters,
FSIS expects the number of applications submitted to be 20,000.\3\
Using the $27.91 fee, the cost per exporter would be $2,791. If small
establishments require fewer applications, then the cost per small
establishment is even lower. Therefore, the Agency believes that the
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Footnote 1, page 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In making its determination, the Agency considered two
alternatives: (1) The status quo (only paper-based export applications)
and (2) require exporters to submit electronic export applications and
charge an application fee for the service. The status quo alternative
was
[[Page 3164]]
rejected, because electronic export applications are necessary to
implement the PHIS export component. Without the electronic export
application alternative, exporters will not reap the benefits of the
PHIS's export component.
The second alternative, to make the electronic export application
mandatory and charging a fee, was rejected because export certificates
are a regulatory requirement, and the paper-based application process
(at no charge) must be available to exporters. The proposed rule would
provide for both the paper-based and electronic export application
process, which will minimize the impact on small entities because it
will allow them, as well as other exporters, to continue using the
paper-based application process. To make electronic export applications
mandatory would have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities, because the $27.91 fee would increase the cost of
exporting and may be a disadvantage to small entities because they will
not have the option to continue to submit paper-based applications.
However, small entities may choose to utilize the electronic system
because it offers the ability to electronically track and manage the
application and certification process. The $27.91 fee would have to be
absorbed by the small entities or passed along to their customers,
which could negatively impact their bottom line if a large percentage
of their business is exports because they are priced out of the market.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy
development is important. Consequently, in an effort to ensure that
minorities, women, and persons with disabilities are aware of this
proposed rule, FSIS will announce it online through the FSIS Web page
located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations_&_policies/Proposed_Rules/index.asp.
FSIS will also make copies of this Federal Register publication
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for industry, trade groups,
consumer interest groups, health professionals, and other individuals
who have asked to be included. The Update is also available on the FSIS
Web page. Through the Listserv and Web page, FSIS is able to provide
information to a much broader and more diverse audience. In addition,
FSIS offers an electronic mail subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/email_subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export information to regulations,
directives and notices. Customers can add or delete subscriptions
themselves, and have the option to password protect their accounts.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(j) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection
requirements included in this proposed rule (for egg products on the
Application for Export Certificate, FSIS Form 9060-6) have been
submitted for approval to OMB as part of the Public Health Information
System (PHIS) information collection request.
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E-
Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) by, among other things,
promoting the use of the Internet and other information technologies
and providing increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation
will not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and
will not have significant Tribal implications.
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination
in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color,
national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact USDA's Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and
TTY).
To file a written complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office
of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TTY).
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
List of Subjects
9 CFR Part 312
Official Marks, Devices and Certificates.
9 CFR Part 322
Exports.
9 CFR Part 350
Special Services Relating to Meat and Other Products.
9 CFR Part 362
Voluntary Poultry Inspection Regulations.
9 CFR Part 381
Poultry Products Inspection Regulations.
9 CFR Part 590
Inspection of Eggs and Egg Products (Egg Products Inspection Act).
9 CFR Part 592
Voluntary Inspection of Egg Products.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, FSIS proposes to amend 9
CFR chapter III as follows:
PART 312--OFFICIAL MARKS, DEVICES AND CERTIFICATES
1. The authority citation for Part 312 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601-695; 7 CFR 2.17, 2.55.
2. Revise Sec. 312.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 312.8 Export inspection marks.
The export inspection mark required in Sec. 322.1 must be either a
mark that contains a unique identifier that corresponds to the export
certificate or an official mark with the following form: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The number ``529893'' is given as an example only. The
number on the mark will correspond to the export certificate.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JA12.002
[[Page 3165]]
PART 322--EXPORTS
3. The authority citation for Part 322 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601-695; 7 CFR 2.17, 2.55.
4. Revise Sec. 322.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 322.1 Marking products for export.
(a) When authorized by inspection personnel, establishments must
mark the outside container of any inspected and passed product for
export, except ship stores, small quantities exclusively for the
personal use of the consignee and not for sale or distribution, and
shipments by and for the U.S. Armed Forces, with an export inspection
mark as shown in Sec. 312.8 of this subchapter.
(b) When authorized by inspection personnel, establishments must
mark each tank car of inspected and passed lard or similar edible
product, and each door of each railroad car or other closed means of
conveyance, containing inspected and passed loose product shipped
directly to a foreign country, with an export inspection mark as shown
in Sec. 312.8 of this subchapter.
5. Revise Sec. 322.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 322.2 Export certification.
(a) Exporters must apply for export certification of inspected and
passed products shipped to any foreign country. Exporters may apply for
an export certificate using a paper or electronic application. FSIS
will assess exporters that submit an electronic application the charge
in Sec. 350.7(e).
(b) FSIS will issue only one certificate for each consignment,
except in the case of error in the certificate or loss of the
certificate originally issued. A request for a replacement or an in
lieu of paper certificate, except in the case of a lost certificate,
must be accompanied by the original paper certificate. The new
certificate will carry the following statement: ``Issued in lieu of --
------'', with the numbers of the certificates that have been
superseded.
(c) FSIS will deliver a copy of the certificate to the shipper or
exporter. The shipper or exporter may furnish the copy of the
certificate to the consignee for purposes of affecting the entry of
product into the foreign country of destination.
(d) The shipper or exporter must deliver a copy of the certificate
to the agent of the railroad or other carrier that transports the
consignment from the United States otherwise than by water, or to the
chief officer of the vessel on which the export shipment is made, or to
the vessel's agent. The copy must be used only by such carrier and only
for the purpose of affecting the transportation of the consignment
certified.
(e) FSIS will retain a copy of the certificate.
(f) Exporters may request inspection personnel to issue
certificates for export consignments of product of official
establishments not under their supervision, provided the consignments
are first identified as having been ``U.S. inspected and passed,'' are
found to be neither adulterated nor misbranded, and are marked as
required by Sec. 322.1.
PART 350--SPECIAL SERVICES RELATING TO MEAT AND OTHER PRODUCTS
6. The authority citation for Part 350 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624; 7 CFR 2.17, 2.55.
7. In Sec. 350.7 add paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) to read as
follows:
Sec. 350.7 Fees and Charges.
* * * * *
(e) Exporters that submit electronic export certificate
applications will be charged a fee per application submitted.
(f) For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the electronic
export certificate application fee, using the following formula: Labor
Costs (Direct Inspection Labor Cost + Technical Support Cost + Export
Library Maintenance Cost) + Information Technology Costs (On-going
operations Cost + Maintenance Cost + eAuthentication Cost), divided by
the number of export applications.
(g) FSIS will publish notice of the electronic export certificate
application fee annually in the Federal Register.
PART 362--VOLUNTARY POULTRY INSPECTION REGULATIONS
8. The authority citation for part 362 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C 1622; 7 CFR 2.18(g) and (i) and 2.53.
9. In Sec. 362.5, add paragraphs(e), (f), and (g) to read as
follows:
Sec. 362.5 Fees and charges.
* * * * *
(e) Exporters that submit electronic export certificate
applications will be charged a fee per application submitted.
(f) For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the electronic
export certificate application fee, using the following formula: Labor
Costs (Direct Inspection Labor Cost + Technical Support Cost + Export
Library Maintenance Cost) + Information Technology Costs (On-going
operations Cost + Maintenance Cost + eAuthentication Cost), divided by
the number of export applications.
(g) FSIS will publish notice of the electronic export certificate
application fee annually in the Federal Register.
PART 381--POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTION REGULATIONS
10. The authority citation for Part 381 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138F, 450, 21 U.S.C., 451-470, 7 CFR 2.7,
2.18, 2.53.
11. Revise Sec. 381.104 to read as follows:
Sec. 381.104 Export inspection marks.
The export inspection mark required in Sec. 381.105 must be either
a mark that contains a unique identifier that corresponds to the export
certificate or an official mark with the following form: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The number ``529893'' is given as an example only. The
number on the mark will correspond to the export certificate.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JA12.003
12. Revise Sec. 381.105 to read as follows:
Sec. 381.105 Marking products for export.
When authorized by inspection personnel, establishments must mark
the outside container of any inspected and passed product for export,
except ship stores, small quantities exclusively for the personal use
of the consignee and not for sale or distribution, and shipments by and
for the U.S. Armed Forces, with an export inspection mark as shown in
Sec. 381.104 of this subchapter.
13. Revise Sec. 381.106 to read as follows:
Sec. 381.106 Export certification.
(a) Exporters must apply for export certification of inspected and
passed products to any foreign country. Exporters may apply for an
export certificate using a paper or electronic application. FSIS will
assess exporters that submit an electronic application the charge in
Sec. 362.5(e).
(b) FSIS will issue only one certificate for each consignment,
except in the case of error in the certificate or loss of the
certificate originally issued. A request
[[Page 3166]]
for a replacement or in lieu of paper certificate, except in the case
of a lost certificate, must be accompanied by the original paper
certificate. The new certificate will carry the following statement:
``Issued in lieu of --------'', with the numbers of the certificates
that have been superseded.
(c) FSIS will deliver a copy of the certificate to the person who
requested such certificate or his agent. Such persons may duplicate the
certificate as required in connection with the exportation of the
product.
(d) FSIS will retain a copy of the certificate.
(e) Exporters may request inspection personnel to issue
certificates for export consignments of product of official
establishments not under their supervision, provided the consignments
are first identified as having been ``U.S. inspected and passed,'' are
found to be neither adulterated nor misbranded, and are marked as
required by Sec. 381.105.
PART 590--INSPECTION OF EGGS AND EGG PRODUCTS (EGG PRODUCTS
INSPECTION ACT)
14. The authority citation for Part 590 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031-1056.
15. Add Sec. 590.407 to read as follows:
Sec. 590.407 Export certification and marking of containers with
export inspection mark.
(a) Exporters must apply for export certification of inspected and
passed products shipped to any foreign country. Exporters may apply for
an export certificate using a paper or electronic application. FSIS
will assess exporters that submit an electronic application the charge
in Sec. 592.500(d).
(b) FSIS will issue only one certificate for each consignment,
except in the case of error in the certificate or loss of the
certificate originally issued. A request for a replacement or in lieu
of paper certificate, except in the case of a lost certificate, must be
accompanied by the original paper certificate. The new certificate will
carry the following statement: ``Issued in lieu of --------'', with the
numbers of the certificates that have been superseded.
(c) FSIS will deliver a copy of the export certificate to the
person who requested such certificate or his agent. Such persons may
duplicate the certificate as required in connection with the
exportation of the product.
(d) FSIS will retain a copy of the certificate.
(e) When authorized by inspection personnel, establishments must
mark the outside container of any inspected and passed egg products
destined for export, except ship stores, small quantities exclusively
for the personal use of the consignee and not for sale or distribution,
and shipments by and for the U.S. Armed Forces, with a mark that
contains a unique identifier that corresponds to the export certificate
or an export inspection mark with the following form:\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The number ``529893'' is given as an example only. The
number on the export certificate will correspond to the export
certificate.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JA12.004
(f) Exporters may request inspection personnel to issue
certificates for export consignments of product of official
establishments not under their supervision, provided the consignments
are first identified as having been ``U.S. inspected and passed,'' are
found to be neither adulterated nor misbranded, and are marked as
required by paragraph (e) of this section.
PART 592--VOLUNTARY INSPECTION OF EGG PRODUCTS
16. The authority citation for Part 592 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
17. In Sec. 592.20 add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
* * * * *
(d) Export certification. Upon application, by any person intending
to export any egg product, inspectors may make certifications regarding
products for human food purposes, to be exported, as meeting conditions
or standards that are not imposed or are in addition to those imposed
by the regulations in the part and the laws under which such
regulations were issued.
17. Revise Sec. 592.500 paragraph (a) and add paragraphs (d), (e),
and (f) as follows:
Sec. 592.500 Payment of fees and charges.
(a) Fees and charges for voluntary base time rate, overtime
inspection service, holiday inspection service, and electronic export
applications shall be paid by the interested party making the
application for such service, in accordance with the applicable
provisions of this section and Sec. 592.510 through Sec. 592.530,
both inclusive. If so required by the inspection personnel, such fees
and charges shall be paid in advance.
* * * * *
(d) Exporters that submit electronic export certificate
applications will be charged a fee per application submitted.
(e) For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the electronic
export certificate application fee, using the following formula: Labor
Costs (Direct Inspection Labor Cost + Technical Support Cost + Export
Library Maintenance Cost) + Information Technology Costs (On-going
operations Cost + Maintenance Cost + eAuthentication Cost), divided by
the number of export applications.
(f) FSIS will publish notice of the electronic export certificate
application fee annually in the Federal Register.
Done at Washington, DC, on January 11, 2012.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-1158 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P