Electric Engineering, Architectural Services, Design Policies and Construction Standards, 3070-3073 [2012-1157]
Download as PDF
3070
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
users to establish deposit accounts with
NTIS for payment of interlibrary loan
fees. Subject to a reduction for the
actual costs of performing the invoicing
service by NTIS, all funds will be
returned to NAL for credit to the
appropriations account charged with the
cost of processing the interlibrary loan
request.
Dated: January 13, 2012.
Edward B. Knipling,
Administrator, Agricultural Research Service.
standards in § 3 of the Executive Order.
In addition, all state and local laws and
regulations that conflict with this final
rule will be preempted; no retroactive
effect will be given to the final rule; and
in accordance with § 212(e) of the
Department of Agriculture
Reorganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C.
6912(e)), administrative appeal
procedures, if any, must be exhausted
before litigation against the Department
or its agencies may be initiated.
[FR Doc. 2012–1251 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
BILLING CODE 3410–03–P
It has been determined that the
Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule since the Agency
is not required by 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq,
or any other provision of law to publish
a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to the subject matter of this rule.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Parts 1724 and 1726
Information Collection and
Recordkeeping Requirements
RIN 0572–AC20
Electric Engineering, Architectural
Services, Design Policies and
Construction Standards
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) is amending the contract
threshold amounts that require
borrowers to use certain prescribed
agency contract forms and the contract
dollar amounts that require RUS review
of contracts prior to the contract being
effective. Also, RUS is raising the
threshold amounts requiring RUS
borrowers to use certain required
procurement methods for materials,
equipment and contract services that
otherwise would require RUS prior
approval. The changes in the threshold
amounts will reduce the number of
contracts reviewed by the RUS.
DATES: This rule is effective February
22, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Junta, USDA–Rural Utilities
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Stop 1569, Washington, DC 20250–
1569. Telephone (202) 720–3720 or
email to donald.junta@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
This rule contains no additional
reporting or recordkeeping burdens
under Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control numbers 0572–0107 and
0572–0118 that would require approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have any
substantial direct effect on states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications
requiring the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The program described by this rule is
listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Programs under number
10.850, Rural Electrification Loans and
Loan Guarantees. This catalog is
available on the Internet and the
General Services Administration’s
(GSA) free CFDA Web site at https://
www.cfda.gov.
Executive Order 12372
This rule is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ as implemented under
USDA’s regulations at 7 CFR part 3015.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. RUS has determined
that this rule meets the applicable
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Over the last year, the Agency has
conducted extensive tribal consultations
related to the implementation of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Substantially Underserved Trust Area
(SUTA) provisions of the 2008 Farm
Bill. During those consultations all RUS
programs were discussed. A specific
regulation on SUTA is being prepared.
The policies contained in this rule do
not impose substantial unreimbursed
compliance costs on Indian Tribal
governments or have tribal implications
that preempt tribal law.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995) for State,
local, and tribal governments for the
private sector. Thus, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of §§ 202
and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act
Certification
This rule has been examined under
RUS environmental regulations at 7 CFR
part 1794. The Administrator has
determined that this rule is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
environment. Therefore, in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an
Environmental Impact Statement or
Assessment is not required.
E-Government Act Compliance
RUS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Background
The Rural Electrification Act of 1936
(7 U.S.C. 901–950b (REAct)), as
amended, establishes the authority for
RUS to provide loans and loan
guarantees to eligible entities for
furnishing electric service to rural areas.
The standard loan agreement between
RUS and its electric borrowers provides
that, in accordance with applicable RUS
regulations, the borrower shall use
standard forms of contracts promulgated
by RUS for construction, procurement,
engineering services and architectural
services for transactions above the
established threshold dollar levels
(‘‘threshold levels’’).
Electric borrowers are also expected
to obtain RUS approvals for procuring
materials, equipment and contracting
services for use in the electric systems
where the contract amount exceeds
specified threshold levels.
Threshold levels that apply to
contracts entered into by borrowers
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
were initially established to capture
significant transactions that could
adversely affect RUS loan security. The
threshold levels were most recently
revised in 1995. Cost increases and
inflation over time have greatly
increased the need for more approvals
than is consistent with the earlier
threshold levels. The result has been
increased delay to the borrowers in
receiving RUS approvals and increased
workloads at RUS. Inflation is not the
only relevant variable in the RUS
proposal to modify the threshold levels.
In this rule RUS has also considered the
level of sophistication in borrowers’
operations, RUS staff constraints and
competing priorities within RUS. The
need to adjust the threshold levels is a
result of these considerations.
In response to borrowers’ requests and
mindful of the directives in Executive
Order 13563 of January 18, 2011, to
determine if any regulations should be
modified to make agencies’ regulations
less burdensome in achieving their
objectives, RUS undertook an
examination of certain thresholds used
in determining when the use of
prescribed forms and approvals would
apply. RUS examined the number of
contracts it reviewed over the last
several years. RUS also reviewed the
rate of inflation factors published in the
Handy-Whitman Index of Public Utility
Construction Costs in order to adjust for
inflation occurring after the existing
requirements were established.
As a result of this review, RUS
determined that although it remains
necessary and appropriate to continue
these requirements as one means of
oversight of its borrowers’ financial and
operational activities, the existing
threshold levels should be raised.
Raising these threshold levels will
reduce the volume of contracts that
borrowers will be required to submit for
RUS approvals. Doing so will reduce the
paperwork burdens on borrowers and
the administrative burdens on RUS.
RUS is revising these threshold levels
an average of 300 percent. RUS
estimates that the revision will reduce
the volume of contracts it receives
pursuant to these requirements by 50
percent.
The Agency published a proposed
rule on May 17, 2011, at 76 FR 28333
proposing to amend the contract
threshold requirements.
is summarized below with the Agency’s
responses as follows:
Issue 1: Commenter proposed that the
amounts in the proposed regulation be
established as a ‘‘base case,’’ and
escalated annually using the Handy
Whitman Index of Public Utility
Construction Costs.
Response: The Agency does not
concur at this time. The Agency believes
that the threshold limits set forth are
appropriate at this time. The Agency
may re-evaluate the threshold limits at
a later date.
Issue 2: Commenter proposed a
clarifying change that a statement be
added to the regulation that a borrower’s
voluntary use of an RUS form contract
when not required by this proposed
regulation does not subject the contract
to RUS review and approval.
Response: Agency concurs. A
clarifying statement is not needed if the
RUS form contract is not required.
Issue 3: Commenter proposed
allowing a borrower to seek RUS’ prior
permission to use negotiated bidding in
the case where the formal or informal
competitive bidding required in 7 CFR
1726.125(b)(2) is not practical.
Response: Agency does not concur.
The current rule allows ‘‘multiparty
negotiations’’ to be used in 7 CFR
1726.125 (b)(3), which is similar to the
comment received to allow ‘‘negotiated
bidding.’’
The second submission was received
from Tri-State Generation and
Transmission Association, Inc. (TriState). Tri-State stated in their
submission that ‘‘The proposed rules
will increase Tri-State efficiency and
reduce burdens on Tri-State.’’ Tri-State
also said in their submission that ‘‘RUS
should adopt the Proposed Rules.’’
Response: Agency concurs. The
proposed regulation will increase
efficiency and reduce burdens on all
RUS borrowers.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
RUS received two submissions
electronically on this proposed rule by
the July 18, 2011, comment deadline.
The first submission was received from
the National Rural Electric Cooperative
Association (NRECA). The submission
Electric power, Loan programsenergy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
3071
PART 1724—ELECTRIC
ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES AND DESIGN POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 1724
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 901 et seq., 1921 et
seq., 6941 et seq.
Subpart E—Electric System Design
2. Section 1724.54 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(2) and paragraph
(g)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 1724.54 Requirements for RUS approval
of plans and specifications.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * *
(2) The borrower shall obtain RUS
approval, prior to issuing invitations to
bid, of the terms and conditions for all
generating plant equipment or
construction contracts which will cost
$5,000,000 or more. Unless RUS
approval is required by paragraph (a) of
this section, plans and specifications for
generating plant equipment and
construction do not require RUS
approval.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) The borrower shall obtain RUS
approval, prior to issuing invitations to
bid, of the terms and conditions for
communications and control facilities
contracts which will cost $1,500,000 or
more. Unless RUS approval is required
by paragraph (a) of this section, plans
and specifications for communications
and control facilities do not require RUS
approval.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1726—ELECTRIC SYSTEM
CONSTRUCTION POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES
3. The authority citation for part 1726
continues to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 901 et seq., 1921 et
seq., 6941 et seq.
7 CFR Part 1724
Subpart A—General
Electric power, Loan programsenergy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas.
7 CFR Part 1726
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
RUS amends chapter XVII of title 7 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4. Section 1726.14 is amended by
revising the definition of ‘‘minor
modification or improvement’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 1726.14
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Minor modification or improvement
means a project the cost of which is
$150,000 or less, exclusive of the cost of
owner furnished materials.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
3072
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
■
exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1726.50 Distribution line materials and
equipment.
Subpart C—Substation And
Transmission Facilities
Subpart B—Distribution Facilities
5. Section 1726.50 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
(a) Contract forms. (1) The borrower
shall use RUS Form 198, Equipment
Contract, for purchases of equipment
where the total cost of the contract is
more than $1,000,000.
(2) The borrower may, in its
discretion, use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, or a written
purchase order equal to $1,000,000 or
less for purchases of equipment, and for
all materials.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Section 1726.51 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1) and
(b)(2) to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1726.51
Distribution line construction.
(a) * * *
(1) The borrower may use RUS Form
790, Electric System Construction
Contract—Non-Site Specific
Construction, under the following
circumstances:
(i) For contracts for which the
borrower supplies all materials and
equipment; or
(ii) For non-site specific construction
contracts accounted for under the work
order procedure; or
(iii) If neither paragraph (a)(1)(i) or
(a)(1)(ii) of this section are applicable,
the borrower may use RUS Form 790 for
contracts, up to a cumulative total of
$500,000 or one percent of net utility
plant (NUP), whichever is greater, per
calendar year of distribution line
construction, exclusive of the cost of
owner furnished materials and
equipment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) It is the responsibility of each
borrower to determine the procurement
method that best meets its needs to
award contracts in amounts of up to a
cumulative total of $750,000 or one
percent of NUP, whichever is greater,
per calendar year of distribution line
construction (including minor
modifications or improvements),
exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment.
(2) In addition to the cumulative total
stipulated in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, a borrower may use Multiparty
Unit Price Quotations to award
contracts in amounts of up to a
cumulative total of $1,000,000 or 1.5
percent of NUP, whichever is greater,
per calendar year of distribution line
construction (including minor
modifications or improvements),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
7. Section 1726.76 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 1726.76 Substation and transmission
line materials and equipment.
(a) Contract forms. (1) The borrower
shall use RUS Form 198, Equipment
Contract, for purchases of equipment
where the total cost of the contract is
$1,000,000 or more.
(2) The borrower may, in its
discretion, use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, or a written
purchase order for purchases of
equipment of less than $1,000,000 and
for all materials.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Section 1726.77 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (c) to read
as follows:
$5,000,000 or more and for any
generating plant equipment contract
requiring RUS approval.
(2) The borrower shall use RUS Form
200, Construction Contract—Generating,
for generating project construction
contracts in the amount of $5,000,000 or
more and for any generating project
construction contract requiring RUS
approval.
(3) The borrower may, in its
discretion, use other contract forms or
written purchase order forms for those
contracts in amounts of less than
$5,000,000 and that do not require RUS
approval.
(b) Procurement procedures. (1) It is
the responsibility of each borrower to
determine the procurement method that
best meets its needs to award contracts
in amounts of less than $5,000,000 each.
(2) If the amount of the contract is
$5,000,000 or more or if the contract
requires RUS approval, the borrower
must use formal or informal competitive
bidding to award the contract.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1726.77 Substation and transmission
line construction.
Subpart E—Buildings
*
■
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) It is the responsibility of each
borrower to determine the procurement
method that best meets its needs to
award contracts not requiring RUS
approval in amounts of up to a
cumulative total of $750,000 or one
percent of NUP (not to exceed
$5,000,000), whichever is greater, per
calendar year of substation and
transmission line construction
(including minor modifications or
improvements), exclusive of the cost of
owner furnished materials and
equipment.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Contract approval. Individual
contracts in the amount of $750,000 or
more or one percent of NUP (not to
exceed $1,500,000 for distribution
borrowers or $4,500,000 for power
supply borrowers), whichever is greater,
exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment, are subject to
RUS approval.
Subpart D—Generation Facilities
9. Section 1726.125 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1726.125
Generating plant facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Contract forms. (1) The borrower
shall use RUS Form 198, Equipment
Contract, for the purchase of generating
plant equipment in the amount of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10. Section 1726.150 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 1726.150
Headquarters buildings.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Procurement procedures. A
borrower may use Multiparty Lump
Sum Quotations to award contracts in
amounts of up to a cumulative total of
$750,000 or one percent of NUP (not to
exceed $5,000,000), whichever is
greater, per calendar year of
headquarters construction (including
minor modifications or improvements).
The borrower shall use formal
competitive bidding for all other
headquarters contract construction.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart F—General Plant
11. Section 1726.176 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(3) to
read as follows:
■
§ 1726.176
facilities.
Communications and control
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Procurement procedures. (i) It is
the responsibility of each borrower to
determine the procurement method that
best meets its needs to award contracts
not requiring RUS approval in amounts
of up to a cumulative total of $750,000
or one percent of NUP (not to exceed
$5,000,000), whichever is greater, per
calendar year of communications and
control facilities construction (including
minor modifications or improvements),
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Contract approval. Individual
contracts in amounts of $750,000 or
more or one percent of NUP (not to
exceed $1,500,000 for distribution
borrowers or $4,500,000 for power
supply borrowers), whichever is greater,
exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment, are subject to
RUS approval.
Dated: January 11, 2012.
James R. Newby,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–1157 Filed 1–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
[NRC–2008–0554]
RIN 3150–AI35
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) Codes and New and
Revised ASME Code Cases;
Corrections
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendments.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is correcting the
preamble, or statements of consideration
(SOC), and the codified text in a final
rule that was published in the Federal
Register on June 21, 2011 (76 FR 36232).
The final rule amended the NRC’s
regulations to incorporate by reference
various editions and addenda to the
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
(B&PV) Code, and the ASME Code for
Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear
Power Plants (OM Code). The final rule
also incorporated by reference (with
conditions on their use) ASME B&PV
Code Cases N–722–1 and N–770–1. This
document is necessary to correct
typographical, formatting, and
punctuation errors.
DATES: The correction is effective on
January 23, 2012 and applicable to July
21, 2011, the date the original rule
became effective. The incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed
in the rule was approved by the Director
of the Office of the Federal Register as
of July 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements and Directives Branch,
Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:17 Jan 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: (301) 492–
3667 or email: Cindy.Bladey@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NRC
published a final rule in the Federal
Register on June 21, 2011 (76 FR 36232),
amending the NRC’s regulations to
incorporate by reference various
editions and addenda to the ASME
B&PV, and the OM Code. The final rule
also incorporated by reference (with
conditions on their use) ASME B&PV
Code Cases N–722–1 and N–770–1. This
document is necessary to correct
typographical, formatting, and
punctuation errors in both the SOC and
the codified text. Also, as published, the
final regulations contain errors which
may prove to be misleading and need to
be clarified. The following corrects the
SOC to the June 21, 2011 document:
1. On page 36241, in the second
column, third paragraph, the first
sentence after Comment is corrected to
read as follows:
The NRC should reconsider the
change specifying that Section E–1200
is not acceptable.
2. On page 36258, in the third
column, the last paragraph, through
page 36259, first column, the first
paragraph, is corrected to read as
follows:
The conditions in § 50.55a(b)(3)(i),
(b)(3)(ii), and (b)(3)(iv) continue to
apply to the 2005 and 2006 Addenda
because the earlier ASME OM Code
provisions that these regulations are
based on were not revised in the 2005
and 2006 Addenda of the ASME OM
Code to address the underlying issues
which led the NRC to impose the
conditions on the ASME OM Code.
3. On page 36265, in the third
column, the third paragraph is corrected
to read as follows:
Paragraph (g)(6)(ii)(F)(10) is a new
condition as a result of incorporating
Code Case N–770–1 in lieu of Code Case
N–770. General Note (b) of Figure 5(a)
in Code Case N–770–1 permits the use
of an alternative examination volume
for welds mitigated by optimized weld
overlays. This alternative examination
volume was not issued as part of the
proposed rule and, therefore, this
condition in the final rule prohibits the
use of the alternative examination
volume. While the NRC does not have
a technical objection to General Note (b)
of Figure 5(a), licensees must obtain
NRC authorization to use the alternative
examination volume pursuant to 10 CFR
50.55a(a)(3)(i) or (ii).
4. On page 36266, in the second
column, second paragraph, the second
sentence is corrected to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3073
Also, some of the terminology used
and some details in this AMP are based
on the 1992 Edition.
5. On page 36266, in the third
column, first paragraph, the second
sentence is revised to read as follows:
A license renewal applicant may
either augment its AMPs in these areas,
as described in the GALL report, or
propose alternatives (exceptions) for the
NRC to review as part of a plant-specific
program element justification for its
AMP. The GALL Revision 1, in AMP
XI.M11A, provides an acceptable
approach for aging management—
through inservice inspection—of PWR
nickel-alloy upper vessel head
penetration nozzles.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 50
Antitrust, Classified information,
Criminal penalties, Fire protection,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nuclear
power plants and reactors, Radiation
protection, Reactor siting criteria,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553,
the NRC is adopting the following
amendment to 10 CFR part 50.
PART 50—DOMESTIC LICENSING OF
PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION
FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 50
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 102, 103, 104, 105, 161,
182, 183, 186, 189, 68 Stat. 936, 937, 938,
948, 953, 954, 955, 956, as amended, sec.
234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2132, 2133, 2134, 2135, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2236, 2239, 2282); secs. 201, as amended,
202, 206, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244,
1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846); sec. 1704,
112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy
Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109–58, 119
Stat. 194 (2005). Section 50.7 also issued
under Pub. L. 95–601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951
as amended by Pub. L. 102–486, sec. 2902,
106 Stat. 3123 (42 U.S.C. 5841). Section 50.10
also issued under secs. 101, 185, 68 Stat. 955,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 2131, 2235); sec. 102,
Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332).
Sections 50.13, 50.54(dd), and 50.103 also
issued under sec. 108, 68 Stat. 939, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2138).
Sections 50.23, 50.35, 50.55, and 50.56 also
issued under sec. 185, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C.
2235). Sections 50.33a, 50.55a and Appendix
Q also issued under sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190,
83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.34
and 50.54 also issued under sec. 204, 88 Stat.
1245 (42 U.S.C. 5844). Sections 50.58, 50.91,
and 50.92 also issued under Pub. L. 97–415,
96 Stat. 2073 (42 U.S.C. 2239). Section 50.78
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3070-3073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1157]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Parts 1724 and 1726
RIN 0572-AC20
Electric Engineering, Architectural Services, Design Policies and
Construction Standards
AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is amending the contract
threshold amounts that require borrowers to use certain prescribed
agency contract forms and the contract dollar amounts that require RUS
review of contracts prior to the contract being effective. Also, RUS is
raising the threshold amounts requiring RUS borrowers to use certain
required procurement methods for materials, equipment and contract
services that otherwise would require RUS prior approval. The changes
in the threshold amounts will reduce the number of contracts reviewed
by the RUS.
DATES: This rule is effective February 22, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Junta, USDA-Rural Utilities
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 1569, Washington, DC 20250-
1569. Telephone (202) 720-3720 or email to donald.junta@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. RUS has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards in Sec. 3 of the Executive Order. In addition,
all state and local laws and regulations that conflict with this final
rule will be preempted; no retroactive effect will be given to the
final rule; and in accordance with Sec. 212(e) of the Department of
Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 6912(e)),
administrative appeal procedures, if any, must be exhausted before
litigation against the Department or its agencies may be initiated.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
It has been determined that the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule since the Agency is not required by 5 U.S.C.
551 et seq, or any other provision of law to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking with respect to the subject matter of this rule.
Information Collection and Recordkeeping Requirements
This rule contains no additional reporting or recordkeeping burdens
under Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control numbers 0572-0107
and 0572-0118 that would require approval under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have any substantial direct effect on states, on
the relationship between the national government and the states, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications requiring the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The program described by this rule is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Programs under number 10.850, Rural
Electrification Loans and Loan Guarantees. This catalog is available on
the Internet and the General Services Administration's (GSA) free CFDA
Web site at https://www.cfda.gov.
Executive Order 12372
This rule is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,'' as implemented
under USDA's regulations at 7 CFR part 3015.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Over the last year, the Agency has conducted extensive tribal
consultations related to the implementation of the Substantially
Underserved Trust Area (SUTA) provisions of the 2008 Farm Bill. During
those consultations all RUS programs were discussed. A specific
regulation on SUTA is being prepared.
The policies contained in this rule do not impose substantial
unreimbursed compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments or have
tribal implications that preempt tribal law.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995) for
State, local, and tribal governments for the private sector. Thus, this
rule is not subject to the requirements of Sec. Sec. 202 and 205 of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act Certification
This rule has been examined under RUS environmental regulations at
7 CFR part 1794. The Administrator has determined that this rule is not
a major Federal action significantly affecting the environment.
Therefore, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an Environmental Impact Statement or
Assessment is not required.
E-Government Act Compliance
RUS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Background
The Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 901-950b (REAct)),
as amended, establishes the authority for RUS to provide loans and loan
guarantees to eligible entities for furnishing electric service to
rural areas. The standard loan agreement between RUS and its electric
borrowers provides that, in accordance with applicable RUS regulations,
the borrower shall use standard forms of contracts promulgated by RUS
for construction, procurement, engineering services and architectural
services for transactions above the established threshold dollar levels
(``threshold levels'').
Electric borrowers are also expected to obtain RUS approvals for
procuring materials, equipment and contracting services for use in the
electric systems where the contract amount exceeds specified threshold
levels.
Threshold levels that apply to contracts entered into by borrowers
[[Page 3071]]
were initially established to capture significant transactions that
could adversely affect RUS loan security. The threshold levels were
most recently revised in 1995. Cost increases and inflation over time
have greatly increased the need for more approvals than is consistent
with the earlier threshold levels. The result has been increased delay
to the borrowers in receiving RUS approvals and increased workloads at
RUS. Inflation is not the only relevant variable in the RUS proposal to
modify the threshold levels. In this rule RUS has also considered the
level of sophistication in borrowers' operations, RUS staff constraints
and competing priorities within RUS. The need to adjust the threshold
levels is a result of these considerations.
In response to borrowers' requests and mindful of the directives in
Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011, to determine if any
regulations should be modified to make agencies' regulations less
burdensome in achieving their objectives, RUS undertook an examination
of certain thresholds used in determining when the use of prescribed
forms and approvals would apply. RUS examined the number of contracts
it reviewed over the last several years. RUS also reviewed the rate of
inflation factors published in the Handy-Whitman Index of Public
Utility Construction Costs in order to adjust for inflation occurring
after the existing requirements were established.
As a result of this review, RUS determined that although it remains
necessary and appropriate to continue these requirements as one means
of oversight of its borrowers' financial and operational activities,
the existing threshold levels should be raised. Raising these threshold
levels will reduce the volume of contracts that borrowers will be
required to submit for RUS approvals. Doing so will reduce the
paperwork burdens on borrowers and the administrative burdens on RUS.
RUS is revising these threshold levels an average of 300 percent.
RUS estimates that the revision will reduce the volume of contracts it
receives pursuant to these requirements by 50 percent.
The Agency published a proposed rule on May 17, 2011, at 76 FR
28333 proposing to amend the contract threshold requirements.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
RUS received two submissions electronically on this proposed rule
by the July 18, 2011, comment deadline. The first submission was
received from the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
(NRECA). The submission is summarized below with the Agency's responses
as follows:
Issue 1: Commenter proposed that the amounts in the proposed
regulation be established as a ``base case,'' and escalated annually
using the Handy Whitman Index of Public Utility Construction Costs.
Response: The Agency does not concur at this time. The Agency
believes that the threshold limits set forth are appropriate at this
time. The Agency may re-evaluate the threshold limits at a later date.
Issue 2: Commenter proposed a clarifying change that a statement be
added to the regulation that a borrower's voluntary use of an RUS form
contract when not required by this proposed regulation does not subject
the contract to RUS review and approval.
Response: Agency concurs. A clarifying statement is not needed if
the RUS form contract is not required.
Issue 3: Commenter proposed allowing a borrower to seek RUS' prior
permission to use negotiated bidding in the case where the formal or
informal competitive bidding required in 7 CFR 1726.125(b)(2) is not
practical.
Response: Agency does not concur. The current rule allows
``multiparty negotiations'' to be used in 7 CFR 1726.125 (b)(3), which
is similar to the comment received to allow ``negotiated bidding.''
The second submission was received from Tri-State Generation and
Transmission Association, Inc. (Tri-State). Tri-State stated in their
submission that ``The proposed rules will increase Tri-State efficiency
and reduce burdens on Tri-State.'' Tri-State also said in their
submission that ``RUS should adopt the Proposed Rules.''
Response: Agency concurs. The proposed regulation will increase
efficiency and reduce burdens on all RUS borrowers.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 1724
Electric power, Loan programs-energy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas.
7 CFR Part 1726
Electric power, Loan programs-energy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, RUS amends chapter XVII of
title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1724--ELECTRIC ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND DESIGN
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1724 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 901 et seq., 1921 et seq., 6941 et seq.
Subpart E--Electric System Design
0
2. Section 1724.54 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(2) and
paragraph (g)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 1724.54 Requirements for RUS approval of plans and
specifications.
* * * * *
(e) * *
(2) The borrower shall obtain RUS approval, prior to issuing
invitations to bid, of the terms and conditions for all generating
plant equipment or construction contracts which will cost $5,000,000 or
more. Unless RUS approval is required by paragraph (a) of this section,
plans and specifications for generating plant equipment and
construction do not require RUS approval.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) The borrower shall obtain RUS approval, prior to issuing
invitations to bid, of the terms and conditions for communications and
control facilities contracts which will cost $1,500,000 or more. Unless
RUS approval is required by paragraph (a) of this section, plans and
specifications for communications and control facilities do not require
RUS approval.
* * * * *
PART 1726--ELECTRIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
0
3. The authority citation for part 1726 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 901 et seq., 1921 et seq., 6941 et seq.
Subpart A--General
0
4. Section 1726.14 is amended by revising the definition of ``minor
modification or improvement'' to read as follows:
Sec. 1726.14 Definitions.
* * * * *
Minor modification or improvement means a project the cost of which
is $150,000 or less, exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials.
* * * * *
[[Page 3072]]
Subpart B--Distribution Facilities
0
5. Section 1726.50 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1726.50 Distribution line materials and equipment.
(a) Contract forms. (1) The borrower shall use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, for purchases of equipment where the total cost of
the contract is more than $1,000,000.
(2) The borrower may, in its discretion, use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, or a written purchase order equal to $1,000,000 or
less for purchases of equipment, and for all materials.
* * * * *
0
6. Section 1726.51 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1) and
(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 1726.51 Distribution line construction.
(a) * * *
(1) The borrower may use RUS Form 790, Electric System Construction
Contract--Non-Site Specific Construction, under the following
circumstances:
(i) For contracts for which the borrower supplies all materials and
equipment; or
(ii) For non-site specific construction contracts accounted for
under the work order procedure; or
(iii) If neither paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (a)(1)(ii) of this section
are applicable, the borrower may use RUS Form 790 for contracts, up to
a cumulative total of $500,000 or one percent of net utility plant
(NUP), whichever is greater, per calendar year of distribution line
construction, exclusive of the cost of owner furnished materials and
equipment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) It is the responsibility of each borrower to determine the
procurement method that best meets its needs to award contracts in
amounts of up to a cumulative total of $750,000 or one percent of NUP,
whichever is greater, per calendar year of distribution line
construction (including minor modifications or improvements), exclusive
of the cost of owner furnished materials and equipment.
(2) In addition to the cumulative total stipulated in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, a borrower may use Multiparty Unit Price
Quotations to award contracts in amounts of up to a cumulative total of
$1,000,000 or 1.5 percent of NUP, whichever is greater, per calendar
year of distribution line construction (including minor modifications
or improvements), exclusive of the cost of owner furnished materials
and equipment.
* * * * *
Subpart C--Substation And Transmission Facilities
0
7. Section 1726.76 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1726.76 Substation and transmission line materials and
equipment.
(a) Contract forms. (1) The borrower shall use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, for purchases of equipment where the total cost of
the contract is $1,000,000 or more.
(2) The borrower may, in its discretion, use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, or a written purchase order for purchases of
equipment of less than $1,000,000 and for all materials.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 1726.77 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (c) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1726.77 Substation and transmission line construction.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) It is the responsibility of each borrower to determine the
procurement method that best meets its needs to award contracts not
requiring RUS approval in amounts of up to a cumulative total of
$750,000 or one percent of NUP (not to exceed $5,000,000), whichever is
greater, per calendar year of substation and transmission line
construction (including minor modifications or improvements), exclusive
of the cost of owner furnished materials and equipment.
* * * * *
(c) Contract approval. Individual contracts in the amount of
$750,000 or more or one percent of NUP (not to exceed $1,500,000 for
distribution borrowers or $4,500,000 for power supply borrowers),
whichever is greater, exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment, are subject to RUS approval.
Subpart D--Generation Facilities
0
9. Section 1726.125 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and
(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 1726.125 Generating plant facilities.
* * * * *
(a) Contract forms. (1) The borrower shall use RUS Form 198,
Equipment Contract, for the purchase of generating plant equipment in
the amount of $5,000,000 or more and for any generating plant equipment
contract requiring RUS approval.
(2) The borrower shall use RUS Form 200, Construction Contract--
Generating, for generating project construction contracts in the amount
of $5,000,000 or more and for any generating project construction
contract requiring RUS approval.
(3) The borrower may, in its discretion, use other contract forms
or written purchase order forms for those contracts in amounts of less
than $5,000,000 and that do not require RUS approval.
(b) Procurement procedures. (1) It is the responsibility of each
borrower to determine the procurement method that best meets its needs
to award contracts in amounts of less than $5,000,000 each.
(2) If the amount of the contract is $5,000,000 or more or if the
contract requires RUS approval, the borrower must use formal or
informal competitive bidding to award the contract.
* * * * *
Subpart E--Buildings
0
10. Section 1726.150 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1726.150 Headquarters buildings.
* * * * *
(b) Procurement procedures. A borrower may use Multiparty Lump Sum
Quotations to award contracts in amounts of up to a cumulative total of
$750,000 or one percent of NUP (not to exceed $5,000,000), whichever is
greater, per calendar year of headquarters construction (including
minor modifications or improvements). The borrower shall use formal
competitive bidding for all other headquarters contract construction.
* * * * *
Subpart F--General Plant
0
11. Section 1726.176 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and
(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1726.176 Communications and control facilities.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Procurement procedures. (i) It is the responsibility of each
borrower to determine the procurement method that best meets its needs
to award contracts not requiring RUS approval in amounts of up to a
cumulative total of $750,000 or one percent of NUP (not to exceed
$5,000,000), whichever is greater, per calendar year of communications
and control facilities construction (including minor modifications or
improvements),
[[Page 3073]]
exclusive of the cost of owner furnished materials and equipment.
* * * * *
(3) Contract approval. Individual contracts in amounts of $750,000
or more or one percent of NUP (not to exceed $1,500,000 for
distribution borrowers or $4,500,000 for power supply borrowers),
whichever is greater, exclusive of the cost of owner furnished
materials and equipment, are subject to RUS approval.
Dated: January 11, 2012.
James R. Newby,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-1157 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P