Security Zone; Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC, 2450-2453 [2012-786]
Download as PDF
2450
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a Special
Local Regulation in conjunction with a
marine event permit. Under the terms of
the instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this regulation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a new temporary § 100.35T08–
0785 to read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 100.35T08–0785 Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; HITS
Triathlon; Corpus Christi Bayfront, Corpus
Christi, TX.
(a) Definitions.
(1) As used in this section
‘‘Participant Vessel’’ means all vessels
officially registered with event officials
to race or work in the event. These
vessels include race boats, rescue boats,
tow boats, and picket boats associated
with the race.
(2) The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, State, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Corpus Christi in the
enforcement of the regulated area
(b) Location. The following area is a
special local regulation: All waters of
the Corpus Christi Bayfront area
contained within the North Entrance to
the Corpus Christi Marina. The western
and eastern boundaries are the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
structures that physically construct the
North Entrance to the Corpus Christi
Marina; respectively, S. Southshore Line
Blvd. and the three Breakwater walls.
The northern boundary is a straight line
running from the entrance of the Corpus
Christi Art Museum Pier Security Fence
(approx 27°48′37.6″ N/097°32′34.3″ W)
to the northern most tip of the
breakwater walls (approx 27°48′31.1″ N/
097°23′27.2″ W). The southern
boundary is a straight line running from
the intersection of Mann St. and S.
Southshore Line Blvd. (approx
27°48′03.5″ N/097°23′28.1″ W) to the
southernmost tip of the breakwater
walls (approx 27°48′09.5″ N/
097°23′18.1″ W).
(c) Enforcement Period. This
regulation will be enforced on February
18, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and
11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and on February
19, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., or
until swim the for each race is complete.
(d) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations for marine events detailed in
§ 100.35, 100.40, and 100.801 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
to all vessels except participant vessels
and those vessels specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Corpus Christi, designated Coast Guard
Patrol Commander or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through must request
permission from the Captain of the Port,
Corpus Christi, designated Coast Guard
Patrol Commander or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or by
telephone at (361) 939–6349.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port, Corpus Christi,
designated Coast Guard Patrol
Commander or a designated
representative.
(e) Informational Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port Corpus Christi or a
designated representative will inform
the public through broadcast notice to
mariners when special local regulations
have been established and if there are
changes to the enforcement period for
this special local regulation.
Dated: November 23, 2011.
J.R. Pasch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Corpus Christi.
[FR Doc. 2012–785 Filed 1–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1165]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Potomac and Anacostia
Rivers, Washington, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the
Potomac River and Anacostia River in
order to safeguard high-ranking public
officials from terrorist acts and
incidents. This action is necessary to
ensure the safety of persons and
property, and prevent terrorist acts or
incidents. This rule prohibits vessels
and people from entering the security
zone and requires vessels and persons
in the security zone to depart the
security zone, unless specifically
exempt under the provisions in this rule
or granted specific permission from the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 4 p.m.
until 11:59 p.m. on January 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1165 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1165 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck,
at Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (410) 576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date of this rule. The Coast
Guard is establishing the security zone
to protect high-ranking government
officials, mitigate potential terrorist acts,
and enhance public and maritime safety
and security. The Coast Guard was
unable to publish a NPRM due to the
short time period between event
planners notifying the Coast Guard of
the event and publication of the security
zone. Furthermore, delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
security zone’s intended objectives of
protecting high-ranking government
officials, mitigating potential terrorist
acts and enhancing public and maritime
safety security.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment, therefore, a 30-day
notice period is impracticable. Delaying
the effective date would be contrary to
the security zone’s intended objectives
of protecting high-ranking government
officials, mitigating potential terrorist
acts and enhancing public and maritime
safety and security.
Background and Purpose
The President will address the nation
on January 24, 2012. During this event,
a gathering of high-ranking United
States officials will take place at the
U.S. Capitol Building in Washington,
DC, in close proximity to navigable
waterways within the Captain of the
Port’s Area of Responsibility.
The Coast Guard has given each Coast
Guard Captain of the Port the ability to
implement comprehensive port security
regimes designed to safeguard human
life, vessels, and waterfront facilities
while still sustaining the flow of
commerce. The Captain of the Port
Baltimore is establishing this security
zone to protect high-ranking
government officials, mitigate potential
terrorist acts, and enhance public and
maritime safety and security in order to
safeguard life, property, and the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
environment on or near the navigable
waters.
Discussion of Rule
Through this regulation, the Coast
Guard will establish a security zone.
The security zone will be in effect from
4 p.m. until 11:59 p.m. on January 24,
2012. The security zone will include all
navigable waters of the Potomac River,
from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on
the north by the Francis Scott Key (U.S.
Route 29) Bridge at mile 113.0,
downstream to and bounded on the
south between the Virginia shoreline
and the District of Columbia shoreline
along latitude 38°51′00″ N, including
the waters of the Georgetown Channel
Tidal Basin; and all waters of the
Anacostia River, from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded on the north by the
11th Street (I–295) Bridge at mile 2.1,
downstream to and bounded on the
south by its confluence with the
Potomac River. This location is entirely
within the Area of Responsibility of the
Captain of the Port Baltimore, as set
forth at 33 CFR 3.25–15.
This rule provides that entry into,
attempted entry into, or remaining in
this security zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port Baltimore. Except for persons
or vessels authorized by the Captain of
the Port Baltimore, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area during the effective period. Vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor at
the time the security zone is
implemented do not have to depart the
security zone. All vessels underway
within the security zone at the time it
becomes effective are to depart the zone
immediately. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port
Baltimore can be contacted at telephone
number (410) 576–2693 or on Marine
Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Coast Guard vessels enforcing the
security zone can be contacted on
Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard will
issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners to
further publicize the security zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2451
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this security zone
restricts vessel traffic through the
affected area, vessels may seek
permission from the Captain of the Port
Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
Furthermore, the effect of this regulation
will not be significant due to the limited
size and duration that the regulated area
will be in effect. In addition,
notifications will be made to the
maritime community via marine
information broadcasts so mariners may
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate or transit
through or within the security zone
during the enforcement period. The
security zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. The security zone is
of limited duration. Although the
security zone will apply to the entire
width of the Potomac and Anacostia
Rivers, traffic may be allowed to pass
through the zone with the permission of
the Captain of the Port Baltimore. Before
the effective period, maritime advisories
will be widely available to the maritime
community. Additionally, given the
time of year this event is scheduled, the
vessel traffic is expected to be minimal.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
2452
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary
security zone. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–1165 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–1165 Security Zone; Potomac
and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All waters of the Potomac
River, from shoreline to shoreline,
bounded on the north by the Francis
Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at mile
113.0, downstream to and bounded on
the south between the Virginia shoreline
and the District of Columbia shoreline
along latitude 38°51′00″ N, including
the waters of the Georgetown Channel
Tidal Basin; and all waters of the
Anacostia River, from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded on the north by the
11th Street (I–295) Bridge at mile 2.1,
downstream to and bounded on the
south by its confluence with the
Potomac River (North American Datum
1983).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means
the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(c) Regulations. The general security
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
165.33 apply to the security zone
created by this temporary section,
§ 165.T05.1165.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Vessels already at berth,
mooring, or anchor at the time the
security zone is implemented, however,
do not have to depart the security zone.
All vessels underway within this
security zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone. The
Captain of the Port Baltimore may, in
his discretion, grant waivers or
exemptions to this rule, either on a caseby-case basis or categorically to a
particular class of vessel that otherwise
is subject to adequate control measures.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the security zone must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port
Baltimore and his designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number (410) 576–2693 or on
Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel, or other Federal, State, or local
agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a
vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zones by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 4 p.m. through
11:59 p.m. on January 24, 2012.
Dated: January 4, 2012.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012–786 Filed 1–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1157]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; 24th Annual North
American International Auto Show,
Detroit River, Detroit, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
on the Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a portion of the Detroit River in
order to ensure the safety and security
of participants, visitors, and public
officials at the 24th Annual North
American International Auto Show
(NAIAS), which is being held at Cobo
Hall in downtown Detroit, MI. Vessels
and persons may not enter this security
zone without permission of the Captain
of the Port Detroit or the COTP on-scene
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
on January 8, 2012, until 12:01 a.m. on
January 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1157 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1157 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LT Adrian
Palomeque, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9508, email
Adrian.F.Palomeque@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2453
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule notice of this
year’s event was not received in
sufficient time for the Coast Guard to
solicit public comments before the
event’s start. Thus, waiting for a notice
and comment period to run would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest because it would inhibit the
Coast Guard’s ability to protect the
spectators of and participants in this
event from the hazards discussed below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
interest for the same reasons discussed
in the preceding paragraph.
Background and Purpose
The 24th Annual North American
International Auto Show (NAIAS) will
be held at Cobo Hall in downtown
Detroit, MI. The NAIAS is the prime
venue for introducing the world’s most
anticipated vehicles. The public
showing days of the NAIAS begin
January 14 and extend through January
22. Prior to the public showing, there
will also be multiple high profile events;
including the press preview days
(January 9–10, 2012), industry preview
days (January 11–12, 2012), and the
charity preview event (January 13,
2012). In 2011, the NAIAS attendance
for the public showing was over 735,000
people and press preview days attracted
over 5,000 journalists representing 55
countries. Attendance and participation
at the 2012 NAIAS is anticipated to rival
last year’s attendance and will likely be
one of the largest media events in North
America.
NAIAS has attracted numerous
protesters from various organizations.
Due to the current state of the economy,
the recent number of layoffs, the
closures of several thousand automotive
dealerships around the country, and the
likely presence of high profile visitors,
it is possible that protests may continue
to occur at this year’s event.
Consequently, the Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined that it is
necessary to safeguard portions of the
Detroit River from destruction, loss, or
injury from sabotage or other subversive
acts.
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2450-2453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-786]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1165]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the Potomac River and Anacostia River in
order to safeguard high-ranking public officials from terrorist acts
and incidents. This action is necessary to ensure the safety of persons
and property, and prevent terrorist acts or incidents. This rule
prohibits vessels and people from entering the security zone and
requires vessels and persons in the security zone to depart the
security zone, unless specifically exempt under the provisions in this
rule or granted specific permission from the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
DATES: This rule is effective from 4 p.m. until 11:59 p.m. on January
24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1165 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1165 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Sector Baltimore
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone (410) 576-2674,
email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
[[Page 2451]]
pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an
agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment
when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.''
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect
to this rule because it is contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date of this rule. The Coast Guard is establishing the
security zone to protect high-ranking government officials, mitigate
potential terrorist acts, and enhance public and maritime safety and
security. The Coast Guard was unable to publish a NPRM due to the short
time period between event planners notifying the Coast Guard of the
event and publication of the security zone. Furthermore, delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the security zone's intended
objectives of protecting high-ranking government officials, mitigating
potential terrorist acts and enhancing public and maritime safety
security.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment, therefore, a 30-day notice period is
impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
security zone's intended objectives of protecting high-ranking
government officials, mitigating potential terrorist acts and enhancing
public and maritime safety and security.
Background and Purpose
The President will address the nation on January 24, 2012. During
this event, a gathering of high-ranking United States officials will
take place at the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, DC, in close
proximity to navigable waterways within the Captain of the Port's Area
of Responsibility.
The Coast Guard has given each Coast Guard Captain of the Port the
ability to implement comprehensive port security regimes designed to
safeguard human life, vessels, and waterfront facilities while still
sustaining the flow of commerce. The Captain of the Port Baltimore is
establishing this security zone to protect high-ranking government
officials, mitigate potential terrorist acts, and enhance public and
maritime safety and security in order to safeguard life, property, and
the environment on or near the navigable waters.
Discussion of Rule
Through this regulation, the Coast Guard will establish a security
zone. The security zone will be in effect from 4 p.m. until 11:59 p.m.
on January 24, 2012. The security zone will include all navigable
waters of the Potomac River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on
the north by the Francis Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at mile
113.0, downstream to and bounded on the south between the Virginia
shoreline and the District of Columbia shoreline along latitude
38[deg]51'00'' N, including the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal
Basin; and all waters of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded on the north by the 11th Street (I-295) Bridge at
mile 2.1, downstream to and bounded on the south by its confluence with
the Potomac River. This location is entirely within the Area of
Responsibility of the Captain of the Port Baltimore, as set forth at 33
CFR 3.25-15.
This rule provides that entry into, attempted entry into, or
remaining in this security zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. Except for persons or
vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area during the effective
period. Vessels already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the
security zone is implemented do not have to depart the security zone.
All vessels underway within the security zone at the time it becomes
effective are to depart the zone immediately. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port Baltimore can be contacted at
telephone number (410) 576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). Coast Guard vessels enforcing the security zone can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The
Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners to further
publicize the security zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this security zone restricts
vessel traffic through the affected area, vessels may seek permission
from the Captain of the Port Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
Furthermore, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due
to the limited size and duration that the regulated area will be in
effect. In addition, notifications will be made to the maritime
community via marine information broadcasts so mariners may adjust
their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending
to operate or transit through or within the security zone during the
enforcement period. The security zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. The security zone is of limited duration. Although
the security zone will apply to the entire width of the Potomac and
Anacostia Rivers, traffic may be allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the Captain of the Port Baltimore. Before the
effective period, maritime advisories will be widely available to the
maritime community. Additionally, given the time of year this event is
scheduled, the vessel traffic is expected to be minimal.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture
[[Page 2452]]
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If
you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-
888-REG-FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a
temporary security zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-1165 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-1165 Security Zone; Potomac and Anacostia Rivers,
Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of
the Potomac River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on the north by
the Francis Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at mile 113.0, downstream
to and bounded on the south between the Virginia shoreline and the
District of Columbia shoreline along latitude 38[deg]51'00'' N,
including the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal Basin; and all
waters of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on
the north by the 11th Street (I-295) Bridge at mile 2.1, downstream to
and bounded on the south by its confluence with the Potomac River
(North American Datum 1983).
(b) Definitions. As used in this section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33
CFR
[[Page 2453]]
165.33 apply to the security zone created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05.1165.
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. Vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the security zone is
implemented, however, do not have to depart the security zone. All
vessels underway within this security zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone. The Captain of the Port Baltimore
may, in his discretion, grant waivers or exemptions to this rule,
either on a case-by-case basis or categorically to a particular class
of vessel that otherwise is subject to adequate control measures.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone must
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
his designated representative. To seek permission to transit the area,
the Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives
can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693 or on Marine Band
Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his
designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zones by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 4 p.m.
through 11:59 p.m. on January 24, 2012.
Dated: January 4, 2012.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012-786 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P