Special Local Regulation; HITS Triathlon; Corpus Christi Bayfront, Corpus Christi, TX, 2448-2450 [2012-785]
Download as PDF
2448
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Accordingly, the interim final rule
remains unchanged and we are adopting
it as final.
Regulatory Procedures
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0785]
RIN 1625–AA08
We consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that this final rule meets the
criteria for a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866 as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Thus, OMB reviewed the final
rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these final rules will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, because they affect individuals
only. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not create any new or
affect any existing collections and,
therefore, do not require Office of
Management and Budget approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.770, Medicare Prescription
Drug Coverage; 96.002 Social Security—
Retirement Insurance.)
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 418
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security
Income (SSI), Medicare subsidies.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 20 CFR chapter III, part 418,
subpart D that was published at 75 FR
81843 on December 29, 2010, is adopted
as a final rule without change.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Executive Order 12866 as
Supplemented by Executive Order
13563
[FR Doc. 2012–827 Filed 1–17–12; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Special Local Regulation; HITS
Triathlon; Corpus Christi Bayfront,
Corpus Christi, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary Special Local
Regulation in the Corpus Christi
Bayfront area within the Corpus Christi,
TX Captain of the Port Zone. This
Special Local Regulation will restrict
vessels from portions of the Corpus
Christi Bayfront area during the HITS
Triathlon on February 18th and 19th,
2012. This Special Local Regulation is
necessary to ensure the safety of HITS
Triathlon participants and protect them
from the hazard of vessel traffic in the
area.
DATES: This regulation will be effective
on February 18, 2012 through February
19, 2012. This regulation will be
enforced on February 18, 2012 from
6:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. to
1:15 p.m., and on February 19, 2012
from 6:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0785 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0785 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email the United States
Coast Guard Sector Corpus Christi’s
Waterways Management Division;
telephone (361) 888–3162, email D08DG-SecCorpusChristi-Prev-PMDWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b) (B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. The Coast
Guard received notice and application
for this event on or about August 15,
2011. The Coast Guard reviewed the
planned event and determined that a
special local regulation is needed to
protect event participants from the
possible hazards associated with local
boat traffic in the area, but that
determination was not completed in
time for a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to be prepares and
comments to be received. Delaying or
foregoing this rule to publish a NPRM
would unnecessarily interfere with the
contractual obligations that may be
involved with the event and would
forego the safety measures necessary to
protect the event participants. The
public interest in holding this event as
scheduled outweighs the chance that
this temporary rule will interfere with
vessel traffic in a meaningful way. This
rule does provide a full 30-day period
before its effective date.
Basis and Purpose
On February 18 and 19, 2012 the
HITS triathlon will take place near and
in the Corpus Christi Bayfront area. This
temporary special local regulation is
necessary to ensure the safety of HITS
Triathlon participants and protect them
from the possible hazards associated
vessel traffic inside the waters of the
Corpus Christi Bayfront area during this
event.
Discussion of the Rule
This special local regulation is
intended to restrict vessel traffic from a
portion of the Corpus Christi Bayfront
area for the swim portion of the
triathlon. The size of the zone was
determined by natural barriers on all 4
sides of the race course and local
knowledge about wind, waves, and
currents in this particular area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
The Coast Guard has determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory
action for the following reasons: (1) The
rule will be enforced for four hours a
day for two days; (2) scheduled breaks
will be provided to allow waiting
vessels to transit safely through the
affected area; (3) persons and vessels
may enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area if they
obtain permission from the COTP or the
designated representative; and (4)
advance notification of amplifying
information about the event and this
regulation will be made to the maritime
community via broadcast notice to
mariners and Local Notice to Mariners
(LNM).
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Federalism
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: (1) This rule will
only be enforced not more than 4 hours
each day; (2) during non-enforcement
hours all vessels will be allowed to
transit through the special local
regulation zone without having to
obtain permission; (3) vessels will be
allowed to pass through the zone with
permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander during scheduled break
periods between races and at other
times when permitted by the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander.
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2449
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
2450
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a Special
Local Regulation in conjunction with a
marine event permit. Under the terms of
the instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this regulation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a new temporary § 100.35T08–
0785 to read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 100.35T08–0785 Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; HITS
Triathlon; Corpus Christi Bayfront, Corpus
Christi, TX.
(a) Definitions.
(1) As used in this section
‘‘Participant Vessel’’ means all vessels
officially registered with event officials
to race or work in the event. These
vessels include race boats, rescue boats,
tow boats, and picket boats associated
with the race.
(2) The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, State, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Corpus Christi in the
enforcement of the regulated area
(b) Location. The following area is a
special local regulation: All waters of
the Corpus Christi Bayfront area
contained within the North Entrance to
the Corpus Christi Marina. The western
and eastern boundaries are the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:39 Jan 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
structures that physically construct the
North Entrance to the Corpus Christi
Marina; respectively, S. Southshore Line
Blvd. and the three Breakwater walls.
The northern boundary is a straight line
running from the entrance of the Corpus
Christi Art Museum Pier Security Fence
(approx 27°48′37.6″ N/097°32′34.3″ W)
to the northern most tip of the
breakwater walls (approx 27°48′31.1″ N/
097°23′27.2″ W). The southern
boundary is a straight line running from
the intersection of Mann St. and S.
Southshore Line Blvd. (approx
27°48′03.5″ N/097°23′28.1″ W) to the
southernmost tip of the breakwater
walls (approx 27°48′09.5″ N/
097°23′18.1″ W).
(c) Enforcement Period. This
regulation will be enforced on February
18, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and
11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and on February
19, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., or
until swim the for each race is complete.
(d) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations for marine events detailed in
§ 100.35, 100.40, and 100.801 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
to all vessels except participant vessels
and those vessels specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Corpus Christi, designated Coast Guard
Patrol Commander or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through must request
permission from the Captain of the Port,
Corpus Christi, designated Coast Guard
Patrol Commander or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or by
telephone at (361) 939–6349.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port, Corpus Christi,
designated Coast Guard Patrol
Commander or a designated
representative.
(e) Informational Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port Corpus Christi or a
designated representative will inform
the public through broadcast notice to
mariners when special local regulations
have been established and if there are
changes to the enforcement period for
this special local regulation.
Dated: November 23, 2011.
J.R. Pasch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Corpus Christi.
[FR Doc. 2012–785 Filed 1–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1165]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Potomac and Anacostia
Rivers, Washington, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing certain waters of the
Potomac River and Anacostia River in
order to safeguard high-ranking public
officials from terrorist acts and
incidents. This action is necessary to
ensure the safety of persons and
property, and prevent terrorist acts or
incidents. This rule prohibits vessels
and people from entering the security
zone and requires vessels and persons
in the security zone to depart the
security zone, unless specifically
exempt under the provisions in this rule
or granted specific permission from the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 4 p.m.
until 11:59 p.m. on January 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1165 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1165 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck,
at Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (410) 576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2448-2450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-785]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0785]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; HITS Triathlon; Corpus Christi
Bayfront, Corpus Christi, TX
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary Special Local
Regulation in the Corpus Christi Bayfront area within the Corpus
Christi, TX Captain of the Port Zone. This Special Local Regulation
will restrict vessels from portions of the Corpus Christi Bayfront area
during the HITS Triathlon on February 18th and 19th, 2012. This Special
Local Regulation is necessary to ensure the safety of HITS Triathlon
participants and protect them from the hazard of vessel traffic in the
area.
DATES: This regulation will be effective on February 18, 2012 through
February 19, 2012. This regulation will be enforced on February 18,
2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and on
February 19, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0785 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0785 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email the United States Coast Guard Sector
Corpus Christi's Waterways Management Division; telephone (361) 888-
3162, email D08-DG-SecCorpusChristi-Prev-PMD-WWM@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. The Coast Guard received notice and
application for this event on or about August 15, 2011. The Coast Guard
reviewed the planned event and determined that a special local
regulation is needed to protect event participants from the possible
hazards associated with local boat traffic in the area, but that
determination was not completed in time for a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to be prepares and comments to be received. Delaying or
foregoing this rule to publish a NPRM would unnecessarily interfere
with the contractual obligations that may be involved with the event
and would forego the safety measures necessary to protect the event
participants. The public interest in holding this event as scheduled
outweighs the chance that this temporary rule will interfere with
vessel traffic in a meaningful way. This rule does provide a full 30-
day period before its effective date.
Basis and Purpose
On February 18 and 19, 2012 the HITS triathlon will take place near
and in the Corpus Christi Bayfront area. This temporary special local
regulation is necessary to ensure the safety of HITS Triathlon
participants and protect them from the possible hazards associated
vessel traffic inside the waters of the Corpus Christi Bayfront area
during this event.
Discussion of the Rule
This special local regulation is intended to restrict vessel
traffic from a portion of the Corpus Christi Bayfront area for the swim
portion of the triathlon. The size of the zone was determined by
natural barriers on all 4 sides of the race course and local knowledge
about wind, waves, and currents in this particular area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
[[Page 2449]]
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
The Coast Guard has determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the following reasons: (1) The rule will be
enforced for four hours a day for two days; (2) scheduled breaks will
be provided to allow waiting vessels to transit safely through the
affected area; (3) persons and vessels may enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the regulated area if they obtain
permission from the COTP or the designated representative; and (4)
advance notification of amplifying information about the event and this
regulation will be made to the maritime community via broadcast notice
to mariners and Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (1)
This rule will only be enforced not more than 4 hours each day; (2)
during non-enforcement hours all vessels will be allowed to transit
through the special local regulation zone without having to obtain
permission; (3) vessels will be allowed to pass through the zone with
permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander during scheduled break
periods between races and at other times when permitted by the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 2450]]
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
Special Local Regulation in conjunction with a marine event permit.
Under the terms of the instruction, an environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion determination are not required for this
regulation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add a new temporary Sec. 100.35T08-0785 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T08-0785 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; HITS
Triathlon; Corpus Christi Bayfront, Corpus Christi, TX.
(a) Definitions.
(1) As used in this section ``Participant Vessel'' means all
vessels officially registered with event officials to race or work in
the event. These vessels include race boats, rescue boats, tow boats,
and picket boats associated with the race.
(2) The term ``designated representative'' means Coast Guard Patrol
Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other
officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State, and local
officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Corpus
Christi in the enforcement of the regulated area
(b) Location. The following area is a special local regulation: All
waters of the Corpus Christi Bayfront area contained within the North
Entrance to the Corpus Christi Marina. The western and eastern
boundaries are the structures that physically construct the North
Entrance to the Corpus Christi Marina; respectively, S. Southshore Line
Blvd. and the three Breakwater walls. The northern boundary is a
straight line running from the entrance of the Corpus Christi Art
Museum Pier Security Fence (approx 27[deg]48'37.6'' N/097[deg]32'34.3''
W) to the northern most tip of the breakwater walls (approx
27[deg]48'31.1'' N/097[deg]23'27.2'' W). The southern boundary is a
straight line running from the intersection of Mann St. and S.
Southshore Line Blvd. (approx 27[deg]48'03.5'' N/097[deg]23'28.1'' W)
to the southernmost tip of the breakwater walls (approx
27[deg]48'09.5'' N/097[deg]23'18.1'' W).
(c) Enforcement Period. This regulation will be enforced on
February 18, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. to 1:15
p.m., and on February 19, 2012 from 6:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., or until
swim the for each race is complete.
(d) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations for marine events
detailed in Sec. 100.35, 100.40, and 100.801 of this part, entry into
this zone is prohibited to all vessels except participant vessels and
those vessels specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Corpus Christi, designated Coast Guard Patrol Commander or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through must
request permission from the Captain of the Port, Corpus Christi,
designated Coast Guard Patrol Commander or a designated representative.
They may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or by telephone at (361)
939-6349.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port, Corpus Christi, designated Coast Guard Patrol
Commander or a designated representative.
(e) Informational Broadcasts. The Captain of the Port Corpus
Christi or a designated representative will inform the public through
broadcast notice to mariners when special local regulations have been
established and if there are changes to the enforcement period for this
special local regulation.
Dated: November 23, 2011.
J.R. Pasch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Corpus Christi.
[FR Doc. 2012-785 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P