Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice, 2291-2292 [2012-692]
Download as PDF
2291
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2012 / Notices
Enter the docket number (P–14311–000)
in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
Dated: January 9, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–688 Filed 1–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM98–1–000]
Records Governing Off-the-Record
Communications; Public Notice
This constitutes notice, in accordance
with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt
of prohibited and exempt off-the-record
communications.
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,
September 22, 1999) requires
Commission decisional employees, who
make or receive a prohibited or exempt
off-the-record communication relevant
to the merits of a contested proceeding,
to deliver to the Secretary of the
Commission, a copy of the
communication, if written, or a
summary of the substance of any oral
communication.
Prohibited communications are
included in a public, non-decisional file
associated with, but not a part of, the
decisional record of the proceeding.
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule
2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record
communications are included in the
decisional record of the proceeding,
unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by
40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
The following is a list of off-therecord communications recently
received by the Secretary of the
Commission. The communications
listed are grouped by docket numbers in
ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the
docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, please contact
FERC, Online Support at FERCOnline
Support@ferc.gov or toll free at (866)
208–3676, or for TTY, contact (202)
502–8659.
Document
dated
Docket No.
Prohibited:
1. CP07–444–000 .........................................................................................................................
2. EC11–60–000 ...........................................................................................................................
3. RM10–23–002 ...........................................................................................................................
Exempt:
1. P–2503–147 ..............................................................................................................................
2. CP11–515–000 .........................................................................................................................
3. CP11–515–000 .........................................................................................................................
4. DI10–9–000 ...............................................................................................................................
5. P–2277–023 ..............................................................................................................................
6. CP11–56–000 ...........................................................................................................................
7. CP11–161–000 .........................................................................................................................
8. P–13417–000 ............................................................................................................................
9. CP11–72–000 ...........................................................................................................................
10. CP12–30–000 .........................................................................................................................
11. P–14263–000 ..........................................................................................................................
12. CP11–14–000 .........................................................................................................................
13. P–12632–002 ..........................................................................................................................
14. P–2188–000 ............................................................................................................................
11–18–11
12–17–11
12–22–11
Several Individuals.1
Marshall Burkes.
Theodore J. Skerpon.
11–1–11
11–2–11
11–14–11
11–18–11
11–21–11
11–28–11
11–28–11
12–5–11
12–9–11
12–15–11
12–16–11
12–20–11
12–20–11
12–22–11
Commission Staff.2
Janice and Kevin O’Keeffe
Commission Staff.3
Hon. John Williamson, M.P.
Commission Staff.4
Commission Staff.5
Commission Staff.6
Hon. Herb Kohl
Commission Staff.7
Hon. Leonard Lance.
Gov. Matthew H. Mead.
Commission Staff‘‘. 8
Hon. Troy Fraser.
Hon. Max Baucus.
1 Form
letters were submitted from 379 individuals over the period of 11/18 to 12/22.
record.
records and email exchanges that occurred on 11/14 and 11/29.
4 Telephone record.
5 Telephone record from three occurrences—11/28, 12/7 and 12/20.
6 Telephone record.
7 Telephone record from two occurrences—12/9 and 12/13.
8 Email exchanges that occurred on 12/20 and 12/27.
2 Telephone
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3 Telephone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
Presenter or requester
17JAN1
2292
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2012 / Notices
Dated: January 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–692 Filed 1–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9618–6]
Request for Nominations for Peer
Reviewers for the Draft Research
Report Entitled, ‘‘Investigation of
Ground Water Contamination Near
Pavillion, WY ’’
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) invites public
nominations of scientific experts to be
considered as peer reviewers for the
external review of the draft research
report entitled, ‘‘Investigation of Ground
Water Contamination near Pavillion,
Wyoming.’’ The draft research report
was prepared by the National Risk
Management Research Laboratory
(NRMRL), within the EPA Office of
Research and Development (ORD), and
by EPA Region 8. EPA released the draft
report for public comment on December
14, 2011 (see Federal Register Vol. 76,
No. 240 at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
pkg/FR-2011-12-14/pdf/FR-2011-1214.pdf). This draft report is not final as
described in EPA’s Information Quality
Guidelines, and it does not represent
and should not be construed to
represent final Agency policy or views.
Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG),
an EPA contractor for external peer
review, will organize and conduct the
external peer review. Nominees must
have expertise in the areas described
under ‘‘Expertise Sought’’ below, be free
of any conflict of interest, and be
available to participate in a one- to twoday peer review meeting that will take
place in March or April, 2012 (exact
date to be determined based on reviewer
availability). ERG will consider and
screen all nominated candidates against
the selection criteria described under
‘‘Reviewer Selection’’ below. A second
Federal Register notice will be
published about one month prior to the
external peer review meeting to provide
the meeting date, location, and
registration information. Additional
details about the peer review process
can be found at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/
si_public_pr_agenda.cfm.
The public comment period for
‘‘Investigation of Ground Water
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
Contamination near Pavillion,
Wyoming’’ began December 14, 2011,
and ends January 27, 2012. Peer
reviewers will be provided with all
public comments for their consideration
as they review the research report.
DATES: Nominations for scientific peer
review should be submitted via email as
soon as they are available, but no later
than February 17, 2012. Nominations
should consist of the nominee’s full
name and their current email address or
other contact information.
ADDRESSES: Peer reviewer nominations
(including full name, email, and if
available phone number) should be sent
to peerreview@erg.com via email
(preferred) or via facsimile at (781) 674–
2906, Attn: Pavillion Peer Review.
Background: Pavillion, Wyoming is
located in Fremont County, about 20
miles northwest of Riverton. The
concern at the site is potential ground
water contamination, based on resident
complaints about smells, tastes, and
adverse changes in water quality of their
domestic wells. ORD and Region 8 have
been collaborating to conduct a ground
water investigation to better understand
the basic ground water hydrology and
how the constituents of concern may be
occurring in the aquifer. A draft
research report entitled ‘‘Investigation of
Ground Water Contamination near
Pavillion, Wyoming’’ was released on
December 8, 2011. Prior to the release of
the draft report, a public meeting was
held November 9, 2011, to discuss
findings and interpretations of data from
the Pavillion site. The draft report and
further information can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/
wy/pavillion/.
Expertise Sought: EPA is seeking
candidates who are nationally and/or
internationally recognized scientists
and/or engineers, who can conduct a
scientifically thorough and unbiased
review of the document. Any qualified
person may be nominated to be
considered for this peer review.
Individuals may self-nominate.
Candidates must have a medium to
high degree of experience and expertise
(and numerous publications, research
projects, or field experience) in one or
more of the following areas:
—Petroleum Engineering (Natural gas,
oil).
—Petroleum Geology (Particularly in
hydraulic fracturing and well-testing
mechanical integrity).
—Hydrology/hydrogeology (In or near
drilling areas).
—Geophysics, Environmental
Engineering (As related to drilling and
its effects).
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—Water Quality (Studies of
contaminated ground water, etc.).
—Organic/Inorganic Chemistry and
Geochemistry (Chemical fate and
transport, oxidation/reduction
reactions, hydraulic fracturing
chemistry and/or gas-liquid exchange
and solubility).
—Conducting laboratory and/or field
research on physical and
biogeochemical processes in
subsurface environments.
—Conducting computer-based research
on physical and biogeochemical
processes in subsurface environments.
—Conducting laboratory and/or fieldbased research in hydraulic
fracturing.
—Conducting peer reviews of scientific
and/or technical research studies and
results for scientific/technical journal
publications.
Reviewer Selection: ERG will contact
each nominee via email to request that
they send to ERG a copy of their CV, fill
out a calendar of availability, complete
a detailed conflict-of-interest form, and
fill out an expertise form. ERG will
carefully consider all candidates
nominated through this process and will
conduct a parallel search for experts to
assemble as broad a pool of initial
candidates as possible. ERG will then
screen all candidates against the criteria
listed below to determine their
suitability as peer reviewers. From
among candidates who most strongly
meet the selection criteria, ERG will
select a final set of five to seven
reviewers who, collectively, best
provide expertise spanning the multiple
areas listed above and, to the extent
feasible, best provide a balance of
perspectives.
Selection Criteria
—Demonstrated scientific credentials
and disciplinary expertise in their
field including:
Æ Scientific credentials equivalent to
a Ph.D. or P.E., Sc.D
Æ Authorship on original publications
and/or reviews in peer-reviewed
scientific journals.
Æ Significant professional
accomplishments and recognition
by professional societies.
—Absence of financial conflicts of
interest.
—Absence of an appearance of lack of
impartiality.
—Willingness and availability to
commit time to the scientific peer
review and to meet all required
deadlines.
—Background experiences that would
contribute to the diversity of
perspectives of the peer reviewers.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2291-2292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-692]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RM98-1-000]
Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice
This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC, Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502-8659.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document
Docket No. dated Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
1. CP07-444-000.......................... 11-18-11 Several Individuals.\1\
2. EC11-60-000........................... 12-17-11 Marshall Burkes.
3. RM10-23-002........................... 12-22-11 Theodore J. Skerpon.
Exempt:
1. P-2503-147............................ 11-1-11 Commission Staff.\2\
2. CP11-515-000.......................... 11-2-11 Janice and Kevin O'Keeffe
3. CP11-515-000.......................... 11-14-11 Commission Staff.\3\
4. DI10-9-000............................ 11-18-11 Hon. John Williamson, M.P.
5. P-2277-023............................ 11-21-11 Commission Staff.\4\
6. CP11-56-000........................... 11-28-11 Commission Staff.\5\
7. CP11-161-000.......................... 11-28-11 Commission Staff.\6\
8. P-13417-000........................... 12-5-11 Hon. Herb Kohl
9. CP11-72-000........................... 12-9-11 Commission Staff.\7\
10. CP12-30-000.......................... 12-15-11 Hon. Leonard Lance.
11. P-14263-000.......................... 12-16-11 Gov. Matthew H. Mead.
12. CP11-14-000.......................... 12-20-11 Commission Staff``. \8\
13. P-12632-002.......................... 12-20-11 Hon. Troy Fraser.
14. P-2188-000........................... 12-22-11 Hon. Max Baucus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Form letters were submitted from 379 individuals over the period of 11/18 to 12/22.
\2\ Telephone record.
\3\ Telephone records and email exchanges that occurred on 11/14 and 11/29.
\4\ Telephone record.
\5\ Telephone record from three occurrences--11/28, 12/7 and 12/20.
\6\ Telephone record.
\7\ Telephone record from two occurrences--12/9 and 12/13.
\8\ Email exchanges that occurred on 12/20 and 12/27.
[[Page 2292]]
Dated: January 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-692 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P