Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Helicopters, 1654-1656 [2012-367]
Download as PDF
1654
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
23, 2011.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012–328 Filed 1–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1453; Directorate
Identifier 2009–SW–46–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109,
A109A, A109A II, A109C, A109K2,
A109E, A109S, and A119 helicopters.
This proposed AD is prompted by a
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) AD issued by the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community. The MCAI AD states that a
Model A109E helicopter has
experienced a failure of the tail rotor
pitch control link assembly caused by a
production defect. The proposed actions
are intended to prevent failure of a tail
rotor pitch control link and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Jan 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Agusta
Westland, Customer Support & Services,
Via Per Tornavento 15, 21019 Somma
Lombardo (VA) Italy, ATTN: Giovanni
Cecchelli; telephone 39 (0331) 711133;
fax 39 (0331) 711180; or at https://www.
agustawestland.com/technicalbullettins. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.
Gary
Roach, Aerospace Engineer, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Regulations and Policy
Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817)
222–5110; email gary.b.roach@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2006–0228–E, dated July 27, 2006, to
correct an unsafe condition for Agusta
Model A109A, A109A II, A109C,
A109K2, A109E, A109S, A109LUH and
A119 helicopters. The MCAI AD states
that an Agusta Model A109E helicopter
has experienced a failure of the tail rotor
pitch control link assembly, part
number 109–0130–05–117, with 10
flight hours. This proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
prevent failure of a tail rotor pitch
control link and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI AD and any related service
information in the AD Docket.
FAA’s Determination
These products have been approved
by the aviation authority of Italy and are
approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with this State of Design
Authority, the EASA, their technology
agents have notified us of the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI AD
and service information. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated
all information provided by the EASA
and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop
on other products of these same type
designs.
Related Service Information
Agusta has issued Alert Bollettino
Tecnico (ABT) No. 109S–5, dated July
26, 2006, for Model A109S helicopters;
ABT No. 109EP–70, dated July 27, 2006,
for Model A109E helicopters; ABT No.
109K–47, dated July 27, 2006, for Model
A109K2 helicopters; ABT No. 109–122,
dated July 27, 2006, for Model A109A,
A109A II, and A109C helicopters; and
ABT No. 119–15, dated July 27, 2006,
for Model A119 helicopters. These
ABTs specify performing a one-time
inspection of the subject link assembly
for excessive friction of the spherical
bearing of the bearing ball and for a
crack. The EASA classified these ABTs
as mandatory and issued EASA AD
2006–0228–E, to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
compliance with specified portions of
the manufacturer’s service bulletin
including:
• Before further flight, inspect the
affected link assembly for freedom of
movement of the links while it is
installed on the helicopter. If a rotation
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
resistance or binding occurs, before
further flight, remove the link assembly
from the helicopter, and either:
• Replace it with an airworthy link
assembly with a ‘‘T’’ marked after the
serial number, or
• Inspect the link assembly for the
torsion value force of the ball bearing.
• If not immediately required by the
previous paragraph, within 5 hours
time-in-service, remove the link
assembly from the helicopter and
inspect the torsion value force of the
ball bearing rotation.
• If the torsion value force in either
end of the link assembly is greater than
7.30 N, the link assembly is
unairworthy.
• If the torsion value force of the ball
bearing in both ends of the link
assembly is equal to or less than 7.30 N,
inspect the stem of the link assembly for
a crack. If a crack is found, the link
assembly is unairworthy.
• For a link assembly that has been
inspected and determined not to have a
crack, before further flight, mark a ‘‘T’’
on the link assembly after the serial
number using an etch pen.
• For a link assembly which has been
inspected and determined to be
unairworthy, before further flight,
replace the link assembly with an
airworthy link assembly. Only a link
assembly with a ‘‘T’’ marked after the
serial number, documenting that the
link assembly has been inspected for a
crack, is eligible for installation.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
This proposed AD does not apply to
uninstalled parts whereas the EASA AD
does apply to uninstalled parts. This
proposed AD includes the Agusta Model
A109 helicopter whereas the EASA AD
does not. The EASA AD applies to the
Model A109LUH helicopter, this
proposal does not. This proposed AD
does not require accomplishing Part III
of the ABTs; the EASA AD does.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 203 helicopters of U.S.
Registry.
We estimate that operators may incur
the following costs in order to comply
with this AD. It would take about
5 work-hours per helicopter to inspect
each tail rotor pitch control link
assembly, the average labor rate is $85
per work-hour, and required parts
would cost about $3,188 per helicopter.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
total cost to be $733,439, assuming the
tail rotor pitch control link assembly
would be replaced on the entire fleet.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Jan 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
According to the production approval
holder’s (PAH’s) service information
some of the costs of this proposed AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage by the PAH. Accordingly, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1655
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new Airworthiness
Directive (AD):
Agusta S.p.A.: Docket No. FAA–2011–1453;
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–46–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta)
Model A109, A109A, A109A II, A109C,
A109K2, A109E, A109S, and A119
helicopters, with a tail rotor pitch control
link assembly (link assembly), part number
(P/N) 109–0130–05–117, with less than 100
hours time-in-service (TIS) and with a serial
number (S/N) with a prefix of ‘‘MO’’ and
S/N 001 through 773 and without the letter
‘‘T’’ suffix after the S/N, installed,
certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
failure of the tail rotor pitch control link
assembly P/N 109–0130–05–117. This
condition could result in failure of the tail
rotor pitch control link and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
(c) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(d) Required Actions
(1) Before further flight, inspect the link
assembly for freedom of movement while it
is installed on the helicopter. If rotation
resistance or binding occurs, before further
flight, remove the link assembly from the
helicopter, and either:
(i) Replace it with an airworthy link
assembly with a ‘‘T’’ marked after the serial
number, or;
(ii) Inspect the link assembly for the
torsion value force of the ball bearing
rotation, in accordance with paragraph (d)(2)
of this AD.
(2) If there is no rotation resistance or
binding found during the inspection required
by paragraph (d)(1) of this AD that required
an immediate torsion value force inspection,
within 5 hours TIS, remove the link assembly
from the helicopter and inspect the torsion
value force of the ball bearing rotation by
referring to Figure 1 and following the
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1656
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Compliance Instructions, Part II, paragraphs
3. through 3.2, of Agusta Alert Bollettino
Tecnico (ABT) No. 109S–5, dated July 26,
2006, for Model A109S helicopters; ABT No.
109EP–70, dated July 27, 2006, for Model
A109E helicopters; ABT No. 109K–47, dated
July 27, 2006, for Model A109K2 helicopters;
ABT No. 109–122, dated July 27, 2006, for
Model A109, A109A, A109A II, and A109C
helicopters; or ABT No. 119–15, dated July
27, 2006, for Model A119 helicopters.
(i) If the torsion value force of the ball
bearing in either end of the link assembly is
greater than 7.30 N, the link assembly is
unairworthy.
(ii) If the torsion value force of the ball
bearing in both ends of the link assembly is
equal to or less than 7.30 N, after cleaning
the link assembly stem using aliphatic
naphtha, or equivalent, and a soft nonmetallic bristle brush, inspect all 4 (four)
faces of the stem of the link assembly for a
crack using a 10x or higher magnifying glass.
If you cannot determine whether there is a
crack in the stem of the link assembly by
using a 10x or higher magnifying glass,
conduct a dye penetrant inspection by
referring to Figure 1 and following the
Compliance Instructions, Part II, paragraphs
6. through 6.7, of the ABT that is applicable
to your model helicopter. If a crack is found,
the link assembly is unairworthy.
(3) For a link assembly which has been
inspected in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this AD and determined to be
unairworthy, before further flight, replace the
link assembly with an airworthy link
assembly. Only a link assembly with a ‘‘T’’
marked after the serial number, documenting
that the link assembly has been inspected for
a crack, is eligible for installation.
(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, may
approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your
proposal to: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Regulations and Policy Group,
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222–5110; email gary.b.roach@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a Part
119 operating certificate or under Part 91,
Subpart K, we suggest that you notify your
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office or certificate holding
district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(f) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in the
European Aviation Safety Agency (Italy) AD
2006–0228–E, dated July 27, 2006.
(g) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6400: Tail Rotor System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December
27, 2011.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–367 Filed 1–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Jan 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0117; Airspace
Docket No. 09–AGL–31]
RIN 2120–AI92
Proposed Establishment of Restricted
Areas R–5402, R–5403A, R–5403B, R–
5403C, R–5403D, R–5403E, R–5403F;
Devils Lake, ND
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
This action extends the
comment period for an NPRM that was
published on November 28, 2011. In
that document, the FAA proposed to
establish restricted area airspace within
the Devils Lake East Military Operations
Area (MOA), overlying Camp Grafton
Range, in the vicinity of Devils Lake,
ND. This extension is a result of a
request from the North Dakota Aviation
Council (NDAC), representing eight
member groups including the Airport
Association of North Dakota, North
Dakota Business Aviation Association,
North Dakota Pilots Association, North
Dakota Professional Aviation Mechanics
Association, and North Dakota Flying
Farmers, to extend the comment period
to the proposal.
DATES: The comment period for the
NPRM published on November 28, 2011
(76 FR 72869), scheduled to close on
January 12, 2012, is extended until
February 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
identified by Docket Number FAA–
2011–0017 and Airspace Docket No. 09–
AGL–31 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Bring comments to
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Privacy: We will post all comments
we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide.
Using the search function of our docket
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments received into any of our
dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: To read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time
or to Docket Operations in Room W12–
140 of the West Building Ground Floor
at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group, Office of
Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591,
telephone (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. We also invite comments relating
to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
please send only one copy of written
comments, or if you are filing comments
electronically, please submit your
comments only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1654-1656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-367]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1453; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-46-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109, A109A, A109A II, A109C, A109K2,
A109E, A109S, and A119 helicopters. This proposed AD is prompted by a
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) AD issued by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European Community. The MCAI AD states
that a Model A109E helicopter has experienced a failure of the tail
rotor pitch control link assembly caused by a production defect. The
proposed actions are intended to prevent failure of a tail rotor pitch
control link and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone (800) 647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Agusta Westland, Customer Support & Services, Via Per Tornavento 15,
21019 Somma Lombardo (VA) Italy, ATTN: Giovanni Cecchelli; telephone 39
(0331) 711133; fax 39 (0331) 711180; or at https://www.agustawestland.com/technical-bullettins. You may review copies of
the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Roach, Aerospace Engineer,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
gary.b.roach@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2006-0228-E, dated July 27, 2006, to
correct an unsafe condition for Agusta Model A109A, A109A II, A109C,
A109K2, A109E, A109S, A109LUH and A119 helicopters. The MCAI AD states
that an Agusta Model A109E helicopter has experienced a failure of the
tail rotor pitch control link assembly, part number 109-0130-05-117,
with 10 flight hours. This proposed AD would require actions that are
intended to prevent failure of a tail rotor pitch control link and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI AD and any related service
information in the AD Docket.
FAA's Determination
These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
Italy and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, the EASA,
their technology agents have notified us of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI AD and service information. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all information provided by the EASA and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of these same type designs.
Related Service Information
Agusta has issued Alert Bollettino Tecnico (ABT) No. 109S-5, dated
July 26, 2006, for Model A109S helicopters; ABT No. 109EP-70, dated
July 27, 2006, for Model A109E helicopters; ABT No. 109K-47, dated July
27, 2006, for Model A109K2 helicopters; ABT No. 109-122, dated July 27,
2006, for Model A109A, A109A II, and A109C helicopters; and ABT No.
119-15, dated July 27, 2006, for Model A119 helicopters. These ABTs
specify performing a one-time inspection of the subject link assembly
for excessive friction of the spherical bearing of the bearing ball and
for a crack. The EASA classified these ABTs as mandatory and issued
EASA AD 2006-0228-E, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require compliance with specified portions
of the manufacturer's service bulletin including:
Before further flight, inspect the affected link assembly
for freedom of movement of the links while it is installed on the
helicopter. If a rotation
[[Page 1655]]
resistance or binding occurs, before further flight, remove the link
assembly from the helicopter, and either:
Replace it with an airworthy link assembly with a ``T''
marked after the serial number, or
Inspect the link assembly for the torsion value force of
the ball bearing.
If not immediately required by the previous paragraph,
within 5 hours time-in-service, remove the link assembly from the
helicopter and inspect the torsion value force of the ball bearing
rotation.
If the torsion value force in either end of the link
assembly is greater than 7.30 N, the link assembly is unairworthy.
If the torsion value force of the ball bearing in both
ends of the link assembly is equal to or less than 7.30 N, inspect the
stem of the link assembly for a crack. If a crack is found, the link
assembly is unairworthy.
For a link assembly that has been inspected and determined
not to have a crack, before further flight, mark a ``T'' on the link
assembly after the serial number using an etch pen.
For a link assembly which has been inspected and
determined to be unairworthy, before further flight, replace the link
assembly with an airworthy link assembly. Only a link assembly with a
``T'' marked after the serial number, documenting that the link
assembly has been inspected for a crack, is eligible for installation.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
This proposed AD does not apply to uninstalled parts whereas the
EASA AD does apply to uninstalled parts. This proposed AD includes the
Agusta Model A109 helicopter whereas the EASA AD does not. The EASA AD
applies to the Model A109LUH helicopter, this proposal does not. This
proposed AD does not require accomplishing Part III of the ABTs; the
EASA AD does.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 203 helicopters of
U.S. Registry.
We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order
to comply with this AD. It would take about 5 work-hours per helicopter
to inspect each tail rotor pitch control link assembly, the average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour, and required parts would cost about
$3,188 per helicopter. Based on these figures, we estimate the total
cost to be $733,439, assuming the tail rotor pitch control link
assembly would be replaced on the entire fleet.
According to the production approval holder's (PAH's) service
information some of the costs of this proposed AD may be covered under
warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage by the PAH. Accordingly, we have
included all costs in our cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
Airworthiness Directive (AD):
Agusta S.p.A.: Docket No. FAA-2011-1453; Directorate Identifier
2009-SW-46-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109, A109A,
A109A II, A109C, A109K2, A109E, A109S, and A119 helicopters, with a
tail rotor pitch control link assembly (link assembly), part number
(P/N) 109-0130-05-117, with less than 100 hours time-in-service
(TIS) and with a serial number (S/N) with a prefix of ``MO'' and S/N
001 through 773 and without the letter ``T'' suffix after the S/N,
installed, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a failure of the tail
rotor pitch control link assembly P/N 109-0130-05-117. This
condition could result in failure of the tail rotor pitch control
link and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(d) Required Actions
(1) Before further flight, inspect the link assembly for freedom
of movement while it is installed on the helicopter. If rotation
resistance or binding occurs, before further flight, remove the link
assembly from the helicopter, and either:
(i) Replace it with an airworthy link assembly with a ``T''
marked after the serial number, or;
(ii) Inspect the link assembly for the torsion value force of
the ball bearing rotation, in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of
this AD.
(2) If there is no rotation resistance or binding found during
the inspection required by paragraph (d)(1) of this AD that required
an immediate torsion value force inspection, within 5 hours TIS,
remove the link assembly from the helicopter and inspect the torsion
value force of the ball bearing rotation by referring to Figure 1
and following the
[[Page 1656]]
Compliance Instructions, Part II, paragraphs 3. through 3.2, of
Agusta Alert Bollettino Tecnico (ABT) No. 109S-5, dated July 26,
2006, for Model A109S helicopters; ABT No. 109EP-70, dated July 27,
2006, for Model A109E helicopters; ABT No. 109K-47, dated July 27,
2006, for Model A109K2 helicopters; ABT No. 109-122, dated July 27,
2006, for Model A109, A109A, A109A II, and A109C helicopters; or ABT
No. 119-15, dated July 27, 2006, for Model A119 helicopters.
(i) If the torsion value force of the ball bearing in either end
of the link assembly is greater than 7.30 N, the link assembly is
unairworthy.
(ii) If the torsion value force of the ball bearing in both ends
of the link assembly is equal to or less than 7.30 N, after cleaning
the link assembly stem using aliphatic naphtha, or equivalent, and a
soft non-metallic bristle brush, inspect all 4 (four) faces of the
stem of the link assembly for a crack using a 10x or higher
magnifying glass. If you cannot determine whether there is a crack
in the stem of the link assembly by using a 10x or higher magnifying
glass, conduct a dye penetrant inspection by referring to Figure 1
and following the Compliance Instructions, Part II, paragraphs 6.
through 6.7, of the ABT that is applicable to your model helicopter.
If a crack is found, the link assembly is unairworthy.
(3) For a link assembly which has been inspected in accordance
with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this AD and determined to be
unairworthy, before further flight, replace the link assembly with
an airworthy link assembly. Only a link assembly with a ``T'' marked
after the serial number, documenting that the link assembly has been
inspected for a crack, is eligible for installation.
(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal
to: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and Policy
Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110; email gary.b.roach@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a Part 119 operating
certificate or under Part 91, Subpart K, we suggest that you notify
your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the
manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate
holding district office, before operating any aircraft complying
with this AD through an AMOC.
(f) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in the European Aviation
Safety Agency (Italy) AD 2006-0228-E, dated July 27, 2006.
(g) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6400: Tail Rotor
System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 27, 2011.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-367 Filed 1-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P