Profit and Fee Under Federal Financial Assistance Awards, 1657-1658 [2012-241]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Background
On November 28, 2011, the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) issued
Docket No. FAA–2011–0117; Airspace
Docket No. 09–AGL–31, Proposed
Establishment of Restricted Areas R–
5402, R–5403A, R–5403B, R–5403C, R–
5403D, R–5403E, R–5403F; Devils Lake,
ND (76 FR 72869; November 28, 2011).
Comments to that document were to be
received on or before January 12, 2012.
By request submitted to the docket on
January 2, 2012, the NDAC, representing
eight member groups including the
Airport Association of North Dakota,
North Dakota Business Aviation
Association, North Dakota Pilots
Association, North Dakota Professional
Aviation Mechanics Association, and
North Dakota Flying Farmers, requested
that the FAA extend the comment
period for Airspace Docket FAA–2011–
0117; Airspace Docket No. 09–AGL–31
from January 12, 2012, to April 30,
2012. The organizations requesting an
extension stated that the comment
period deadline of January 12, 2011, did
not allow adequate time to respond.
They noted that the comment period
between the November 28, 2011 notice
and the January 12, 2012 deadline
provided very little opportunity to
research the issue, gain comments and
adequately consider the issue. The
NDAC offered their eight member
organization are holding their annual
meetings during the Upper Midwest
Aviation Symposium, scheduled for
March 4–6, 2012, and plan to use the
opportunity to discuss the proposal,
gain insight into concerns, and receive
position guidance from their members
related to the proposed action; hence
the extension request to April 30, 2012.
Additionally, the NDAC commented the
Christmas and New Year holiday season
fell within the comment period which
greatly reduced the ability to
communicate and get meaningful
coordination completed.
The FAA supports the petitioners’
request for an extension of the comment
period on Docket No. FAA–2011–0117;
Airspace Docket No. 09–AGL–31, for an
additional 30 days in lieu of the 120-day
extension requested. The FAA believes
a 120-day extension of the existing 45day comment period for the proposed
action to be excessive and unreasonable.
The FAA must balance the length of the
comment period against the need to
proceed expeditiously with airspace
actions that support realistic training
requirements in modern tactics for the
military as we manage the safe and
efficient use of the National Airspace
System. The FAA believes an additional
30 days would be adequate for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Jan 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
commenters to collect cost and
operational data necessary to provide
meaningful comment to Docket No.
FAA–2011–0117; Airspace Docket No.
09–AGL–31. The FAA does not
anticipate any further extension of the
comment period for this rulemaking.
Extension of Comment Period
In accordance with section 11.47(c) of
title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, the
FAA has reviewed the request
submitted by the North Dakota Aviation
Council for extension of the comment
period to Docket No. FAA–2011–0117;
Airspace Docket No. 09–AGL–31. This
petitioner has shown a substantive
interest in the proposed rule and good
cause for the extension. The FAA has
determined that extension of the
comment period is consistent with the
public interest, and that good cause
exists for taking this action.
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the comment
period for Docket No. FAA–2011–0117;
Airspace Docket No. 09–AGL–31
published in the Federal Register on
November 28, 2011 (76 FR 72869), FR
Doc. 2011–30495, is extended until
February 12, 2012.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 5,
2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2012–284 Filed 1–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
14 CFR Part 1260
RIN 2700–AD79
Profit and Fee Under Federal Financial
Assistance Awards
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
NASA is proposing to revise
the NASA Grant & Cooperative
Agreement Handbook to prohibit the
payment of profit or fee on Federal
Financial Assistance awards, i. e. grants
and cooperative agreements. This is an
extension of the currently existing
prohibition on payment of profit or fee
to commercial entities under Federal
Financial Assistance awards.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
comments to NASA at the address
identified below on or before March 12,
2012 to be considered in formulation of
the final rule.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1657
Interested parties may
submit comments, identified by RIN
2700–AD79, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be submitted to R.
Todd Lacks (Room 5J75), NASA
Headquarters, Office of Procurement,
Contract Management Division,
Washington, DC 20546. Comments may
also be submitted by email to:
todd.lacks@nasa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
R.
Todd Lacks, NASA Headquarters, Office
of Procurement, Contract Management
Division, Room 5J75; telephone: (202)
358–0799; email: todd.lacks@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
Historically, NASA has discouraged
the payment of profit or fee under its
Federal Financial Assistance awards
because payment in excess of costs is
inconsistent with the intent of grant and
cooperative agreements which provide
funding in the form of financial
assistance to recipients for their
performance of a public purpose. In the
case of awards to commercial firms,
payment of profit or fee is specifically
prohibited. Because the prohibition
does not include other recipients such
as educational and non-profit
organizations, NASA’s policy has been
misinterpreted and inconsistent
application has occurred. A recent
review indicates that, in instances
where the Agency has accepted such
proposals and paid management fees,
the payment of those fees has been
inappropriate for the grant or
cooperative agreement effort. While the
payment of fees, historically, has
occurred on less than 1 percent of
Agency grants and cooperative
agreements, this proposed rule which
extends the prohibition on payment of
profit or fees to all recipients of NASA
grants and cooperative agreements, will
ensure that the regulation accurately
reflects Agency policy.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1658
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA certifies that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because the rule does not impose
any additional requirements on small
entities and currently less than 1
percent of recipients of NASA grants
and cooperative agreements receive
profit or management fees.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paper Reduction Act (Pub. L.
104–13) is not applicable because the
prohibition on payment of profit and
management fees by NASA does not
require the submission of any
information by recipients that requires
the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under
44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1260
Colleges and universities, Business
and Industry, Grant programs, Grants
administration, Cooperative agreements,
State and local governments, Non-profit
organizations, Commercial firms,
Recipients.
William P. McNally,
Assistant Administrator for Procurement.
Accordingly, 14 CFR Part 1260 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
1260 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1), Pub. L. 97–
258, 96 Stat. 1003 (31 U.S.C. 6301, et seq.),
and OMB Circular A–110.
PART 1260—GRANTS AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
2. In § 1260.4, paragraph (b)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 1260.4
Applicability.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) NASA does not pay profit or fee
under grants or cooperative agreements.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 1260.10, paragraph (b)(1)(iv) is
added to read as follows:
§ 1260.10
*
Proposals.
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
§ 1260.14
Limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) NASA does not pay profit or fee
under its grants or cooperative
agreements.
[FR Doc. 2012–241 Filed 1–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Part 515
[Docket No. 11–09]
RIN 3072–AC46
Adjustment of the Amount for the
Optional Rider for Proof of NVOCC
Financial Responsibility for Trade With
the People’s Republic of China
Federal Maritime Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Maritime
Commission proposes to amend its rules
regarding the amount of bond coverage
required in its optional China Bond
Rider for Non-Vessel-Operating
Common Carriers (NVOCCs). The
proposed rule is intended to provide
NVOCCs with the ability to post a bond
with the Commission that satisfies the
equivalent of 800,000 Chinese
Renminbi, for which the equivalent
dollar amount has fluctuated since the
regulation was first adopted by the
Commission.
SUMMARY:
Comments or suggestions are due
on or before March 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this proposed rule to: Karen
V. Gregory, Secretary, Federal Maritime
Commission, 800 North Capitol Street
NW., Washington, DC 20573–0001,
Phone: (202) 523–5725.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Submit
Comments: Submit an original and five
(5) copies in paper form, and if possible,
send a PDF of the document by email to
secretary@fmc.gov. Include in the
subject line: Docket No. 11–09,
Comments on Proposed Adjustment of
the Amount for the FMC Optional China
Bond Rider.
DATES:
Background
Under a Memorandum of
Consultations pursuant to the 2003
bilateral Maritime Agreement between
the United States and the People’s
*
13:59 Jan 10, 2012
(iv) NASA does not pay profit or fee
under its grants or cooperative
agreements.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 1260.14, paragraph (e) is added
to read as follows:
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Republic of China (China or the PRC),
the PRC does not require U.S. NonVessel-Operating Common Carriers
(NVOCCs) to make a cash deposit in a
Chinese bank as would otherwise be
required by Chinese regulations, so long
as the NVOCC:
(1) Is a legal person registered by U.S.
authorities;
(2) Obtains an FMC license as an
NVOCC; and
(3) Provides evidence of financial
responsibility in the total amount of
Chinese Renminbi (RMB) 800,000 or
U.S. $96,000.
An FMC-licensed NVOCC that
voluntarily provides an additional
surety bond in the amount of $21,000
(denominated in USD or RMB), which
by its conditions is available for
potential claims of the MOT (as well as
other Chinese agencies) for violations of
the Chinese Regulations on
International Maritime Transportation,
may register in the PRC without paying
the cash deposit otherwise required by
Chinese law and regulation.
In 2004, the Commission issued a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) to
explore mechanisms for NVOCCs to file
proof of such additional financial
responsibility. See 69 FR 4271 (January
29, 2004). On April 1, 2004, the
Commission issued a final rule that
amended its regulations governing proof
of financial responsibility for ocean
transportation intermediaries to allow
an optional rider to be filed with a
licensed NVOCC’s proof of financial
responsibility to provide additional
proof of financial responsibility for such
carriers serving the U.S. oceanborne
trade with the PRC. Docket No. 04–02,
Optional Rider for Proof of Additional
NVOCC Financial Responsibility, 30
S.R.R. 179 (FMC 2004).
On April 15, 2011, the Commission
received a communication from the
Maritime Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation,
transmitting a request from the Ministry
of Transport (MOT) of the PRC to revise
the Commission’s regulations at
Appendix E to Subpart C of Part 515—
Optional Rider for Additional NVOCC
Financial Responsibility (Optional Rider
to Form FMC 48) [Form 48A] (China
Bond Rider). MOT requested that the
Commission review its financial
responsibility regulations set forth in 46
CFR part 515. MOT asserts that the
exchange rate between the USD and the
RMB has risen from 1:8.276 in 2003 to
1:6.536 at present, an increase of
approximately 21.02%. Consequently,
MOT asserts, the amount of 96,000 USD
is inadequate to meet 800,000 RMB at
the current exchange rate. Specifically,
MOT requests that the regulation be
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1657-1658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-241]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
14 CFR Part 1260
RIN 2700-AD79
Profit and Fee Under Federal Financial Assistance Awards
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NASA is proposing to revise the NASA Grant & Cooperative
Agreement Handbook to prohibit the payment of profit or fee on Federal
Financial Assistance awards, i. e. grants and cooperative agreements.
This is an extension of the currently existing prohibition on payment
of profit or fee to commercial entities under Federal Financial
Assistance awards.
DATES: Interested parties should submit comments to NASA at the address
identified below on or before March 12, 2012 to be considered in
formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments, identified by RIN
2700-AD79, via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be submitted to R. Todd Lacks (Room 5J75), NASA
Headquarters, Office of Procurement, Contract Management Division,
Washington, DC 20546. Comments may also be submitted by email to:
todd.lacks@nasa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Todd Lacks, NASA Headquarters,
Office of Procurement, Contract Management Division, Room 5J75;
telephone: (202) 358-0799; email: todd.lacks@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Historically, NASA has discouraged the payment of profit or fee
under its Federal Financial Assistance awards because payment in excess
of costs is inconsistent with the intent of grant and cooperative
agreements which provide funding in the form of financial assistance to
recipients for their performance of a public purpose. In the case of
awards to commercial firms, payment of profit or fee is specifically
prohibited. Because the prohibition does not include other recipients
such as educational and non-profit organizations, NASA's policy has
been misinterpreted and inconsistent application has occurred. A recent
review indicates that, in instances where the Agency has accepted such
proposals and paid management fees, the payment of those fees has been
inappropriate for the grant or cooperative agreement effort. While the
payment of fees, historically, has occurred on less than 1 percent of
Agency grants and cooperative agreements, this proposed rule which
extends the prohibition on payment of profit or fees to all recipients
of NASA grants and cooperative agreements, will ensure that the
regulation accurately reflects Agency policy.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
[[Page 1658]]
flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule does not impose any additional requirements on small
entities and currently less than 1 percent of recipients of NASA grants
and cooperative agreements receive profit or management fees.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paper Reduction Act (Pub. L. 104-13) is not applicable because
the prohibition on payment of profit and management fees by NASA does
not require the submission of any information by recipients that
requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1260
Colleges and universities, Business and Industry, Grant programs,
Grants administration, Cooperative agreements, State and local
governments, Non-profit organizations, Commercial firms, Recipients.
William P. McNally,
Assistant Administrator for Procurement.
Accordingly, 14 CFR Part 1260 is proposed to be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 1260 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1), Pub. L. 97-258, 96 Stat. 1003
(31 U.S.C. 6301, et seq.), and OMB Circular A-110.
PART 1260--GRANTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
2. In Sec. 1260.4, paragraph (b)(2) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1260.4 Applicability.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) NASA does not pay profit or fee under grants or cooperative
agreements.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 1260.10, paragraph (b)(1)(iv) is added to read as
follows:
Sec. 1260.10 Proposals.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) NASA does not pay profit or fee under its grants or
cooperative agreements.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 1260.14, paragraph (e) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1260.14 Limitations.
* * * * *
(e) NASA does not pay profit or fee under its grants or cooperative
agreements.
[FR Doc. 2012-241 Filed 1-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P