Regulated Navigation Area; Memorial Bridge Construction, Piscataqua River, Portsmouth, NH, 1407-1411 [2012-175]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1154]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Islais Creek, San Francisco, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, Eleventh
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Third
Street Drawbridge across Islais Creek,
mile 0.4, at San Francisco, CA. The
deviation is necessary to allow the City
of San Francisco to make emergency
electrical repairs on the bridge. This
deviation allows the bridge to be
secured in the closed-to-navigation
position during the deviation period.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
8 a.m. on December 18, 2011 to 6 p.m.
on January 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of the docket USCG–
2011–1154 and are available online by
going to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG–2011–1154 in the
‘‘Keyword’’ box and then clicking
‘‘Search’’. They are also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District;
telephone (510) 437–3516, email
David.H.Sulouff@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City
of San Francisco requested a temporary
change to the operation of the Third
Street Drawbridge, mile 0.4, over Islais
Creek, at San Francisco, CA. The
drawbridge navigation span provides a
vertical clearance of 4 feet above Mean
High Water in the closed-to-navigation
position. As required by 33 CFR
117.163(b), the draw shall open on
signal if at least 72 hours advance notice
is given to the San Francisco
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:49 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
Department of Public Works. Navigation
on the waterway is commercial and
recreational.
The Third Street Drawbridge will be
secured in the closed-to-navigation
position from 8 a.m. on December 18,
2011 to 6 p.m. on January 31, 2012, to
allow the City of San Francisco to
complete emergency electrical repairs.
This temporary deviation has been
coordinated with the waterway users.
No objections to the proposed
temporary deviation were received.
Vessels that can transit the bridge,
while in the closed-to-navigation
position, may continue to do so at any
time.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: December 18, 2011.
D.H. Sulouff,
Bridge Section Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2012–171 Filed 1–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1097]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Memorial
Bridge Construction, Piscataqua River,
Portsmouth, NH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The United States Coast
Guard is establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River under
and surrounding the Memorial Bridge
between Portsmouth, NH and Kittery,
ME. This temporary interim rule is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on the navigable waters during bridge
demolition and replacement
construction operations. This rule
implements certain safety measures,
including speed restrictions and the
temporary suspension of vessel traffic
during construction operations that
could be hazardous to nearby vessels.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
from January 10, 2012 through
December 31, 2013. This rule is effective
with actual notice for purposes of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1407
enforcement from December 22, 2011
through December 31, 2013. Public
comments will be accepted and
reviewed by the Coast Guard through
December 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–1097 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Documents indicated in this preamble
as being available in the docket are part
of docket USCG–2011–1097 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2011–1097 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They are also
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Lieutenant Junior
Grade Terence Leahy of the Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Northern New England;
telephone (207) 767–0398, email
Terence.O.Leahy@uscg.mil or
Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt of
the Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard First District, email
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil; telephone
(617) 223–8385. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1408
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
As this interim rule will be in effect
before the end of the comment period,
the Coast Guard will evaluate and revise
this rule as necessary to address
significant public comments.
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–1097),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1097’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
this rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:49 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
1097’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting in connection with the public
comment period for this interim rule.
But you may submit a request for one
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Although it was not held specifically
to solicit public comments on this
interim rule and was not announced in
the Federal Register, the New
Hampshire Department of
Transportation (NHDOT) held a public
waterway user meeting on November
29, 2011, at the Portsmouth, NH City
Hall Building where waterway closures
and bridge demolition plans were
discussed. No comments or concerns
were noted during that meeting that
would impact the drafting of this rule.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
interim rule without prior Federal
Register notice pursuant to authority
under section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)).
This provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice when
the agency for good cause finds that
those procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because immediate action is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
public during demolition of the existing
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Memorial Bridge and subsequent
replacement, and it would be contrary
to the public interest to delay both
demolition and construction.
The need for waterway closures was
not brought to the attention of the Coast
Guard until November 13, 2011 when
the New Hampshire Department of
Transportation (NHDOT) requested a
complete waterway closure for a 3-day
period beginning January 30, 2012. It is
impracticable to issue an NPRM and
take public comment before January
2012, when the bridge construction that
necessitates creation of a regulated
navigation area (RNA) is scheduled to
begin, and when the bridge is at risk of
immediate failure. Following the
conclusion of a lengthy bridge study,
NHDOT determined that it was
immediately necessary to replace the
existing Memorial Bridge due to
concerns that the existing structure may
suffer a catastrophic failure. A bridge
failure could inhibit commercial vessels
from reaching facilities upstream on the
Piscataqua River should the center lift
span become stuck in the down
position, blocking the main navigation
channel. This would have a significant
negative economic impact.
Additionally, any delay or
cancellation of the ongoing bridge
construction plans would be contrary to
public interest as the bridge’s failure
could cause regionally significant
economic, environmental, and safety
impacts. The Coast Guard has
determined that the prompt remediation
of the existing structure will mitigate
the threat of a possible catastrophic
failure.
Once the Coast Guard received
notification of these plans on November
13, 2011 by NHDOT, and established
the need for waterway closures and
speed restrictions for vessel traffic, it
was necessary for the Coast Guard to
move quickly to protect public safety by
safeguarding both the mariners and
construction workers during the bridge’s
demolition and construction. The
dynamic nature of the construction
process and multitude of construction
vessels necessitates that all mariners
navigate at a safe speed within the RNA
in accordance with Rule 6 of the Inland
Navigation Rules, as the barge and
construction equipment configuration
may change on a daily basis. In order to
address any further public concerns,
this rule is available for public comment
until December 31, 2013. The Coast
Guard will publish an amended rule if
necessary to address public concerns.
For the reasons discussed, delaying
the project is contrary to the public
interest, and notice and comment period
are impracticable. Under 5 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of this interim rule is to
ensure the safe transit of vessels in the
area, and to protect all persons, vessels,
and the marine environment during
demolition and reconstruction
operations for the duration of the
Memorial Bridge construction, from
January 30, 2012 through December 31,
2013.
Discussion of Rule
Due to unanticipated structural failure
of the current Memorial Bridge, plans
were put in place to demolish the
existing bridge structure as quickly as
possible and build a new bridge in the
current location. The construction of the
Memorial Bridge involves large
machinery and construction vessel
operations above and in the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River. The
ongoing operations are, by their nature,
hazardous and pose risks both to
recreational and commercial traffic as
well as the construction crew. In order
to mitigate the inherent risks involved
in the construction, it is necessary to
control vessel movement through the
area.
Heavy-lift operations are sensitive to
water movement, and wake from
passing vessels could pose significant
risk of injury or death to construction
workers. In order to minimize such
unexpected or uncontrolled movement
of water, the RNA will limit vessel
speed and wake of all vessels operating
in the vicinity of the bridge construction
zone. This will be achieved by enforcing
a five (5) knots speed limit and ‘‘NO
WAKE’’ zone in the vicinity of the
construction as well as providing a
means to suspend all vessel traffic for
emergent situations that pose imminent
threat to waterway users in the area. The
RNA will also protect vessels desiring to
transit the area by ensuring that vessels
are only permitted to transit when it is
safe to do so.
The Coast Guard has discussed this
project at length with the NHDOT to
identify if the project can be completed
without channel closures and, if
possible, what impact that would have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:49 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
on the project timeline. Through these
discussions, it became clear that while
the majority of construction activities
during the span of this project would
not require waterway closures, there are
certain tasks that can only be completed
in the channel and will require closing
the waterway. At present, NHDOT has
not submitted a complete plan for
waterway closures due to the
expeditious manner that promulgated
drafting this regulated navigation area.
On a case-by-case basis, depending on
the construction schedule, NHDOT may
request a waterway closure on various
dates from January 30, 2012 through
December 31, 2013. As discussed below,
NHDOT will notify the Coast Guard of
planned activities as soon as possible.
The COTP Sector Northern New
England will cause notice of
enforcement, suspension of
enforcement, or closure of this regulated
navigation area to be made by all
appropriate means to ensure the widest
distribution among the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification will include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners. In
addition, the COTP maintains a
telephone line that is staffed 24 hours a
day, seven days a week. The public can
obtain information concerning
enforcement of the regulated navigation
area by contacting Coast Guard Sector
Northern New England Command
Center at (207) 767–0303.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal because this
regulated navigation area requires
vessels to reduce speed through 600
yards of the Piscataqua River, therefore
causing only a minimal delay to a
vessel’s transit. In addition, periods
when the regulated navigation area is
closed to all traffic are expected to be
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1409
short in duration, and we expect to give
advance notice of such closures.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
marinas, charter fishing vessels,
commercial fishing vessels, facilities
servicing deep draft vessels, tugboat
operators, and recreational vessels who
intend to transit in those portions of the
Piscataqua River during the effective
period. Alternatively, smaller vessel
traffic can transit to the north of Badgers
Island and through the backchannel at
Seavey Island to avoid any delays
caused by closures to the waterway
around the Memorial Bridge. In
addition, periods when the regulated
navigation area is closed to all traffic are
expected to be short in duration, and we
expect to give advance notice of such
closures.
This regulation may have some
impact on the public, but the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: it requires vessels to
reduce speed through 600 yards of the
Piscataqua River, therefore causing only
a minimal delay to a vessel’s transit.
Many parties that have the potential to
be affected have been involved in the
discussions and have made plans to
work around the closure times. We will
use various appropriate means to inform
the public before, during, and at the
conclusion of any RNA enforcement
period.
The RNA will apply to the width of
the Piscataqua River within a 300 yard
radius of a position specified in the
regulatory text, under and surrounding
the Memorial Bridge. During full
closures to traffic under the Memorial
Bridge, vessels may be allowed to pass
through the regulated area with the
permission of the COTP.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1410
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–(888) REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:49 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of an RNA.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Any comments received
concerning environmental impacts will
be considered and changes made to the
environmental analysis checklist and
categorical exclusion determination as
appropriate.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–1097 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–1097 Regulated Navigation
Area; Memorial Bridge Construction,
Piscataqua River, Portsmouth, NH.
(a) Location. The following area is a
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA): All
navigable waters, surface to bottom, on
the Piscataqua River within a 300 yard
radius of position 43°04′46″ N,
70°45′10″ W in the vicinity of the
Memorial Bridge construction zone
between Portsmouth, NH and Badgers
Island in Kittery, ME.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and 165.13
apply within the RNA, and in addition:
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations, entry into or movement
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
within this zone, during periods of
enforcement, is prohibited unless
authorized by Captain of the Port
(COTP) Sector Northern New England.
(3) A speed limit of five (5) knots will
be in effect within the regulated area.
All vessels must proceed through the
area with caution and operate in such a
manner as to produce no wake.
(4) Vessels must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP
Sector Northern New England or his onscene representative. The ‘‘on-scene
representative’’ of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the COTP to act on the COTP’s
behalf. The on-scene representative may
be on a Coast Guard vessel; New
Hampshire State Police, Maine State
Police, or other designated craft; or may
be on shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF–FM radio or loudhailer.
Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary
may be present to inform vessel
operators of this regulation.
(5) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of the
vessel must proceed as directed.
(6) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road (33 CFR Subchapter E, Inland
Navigational Rules) remain in effect
within the regulated area and should be
strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement. This regulated
navigation area is enforceable 24 hours
a day from December 22, 2011 until
December 31, 2013.
(1) Notice of suspension of
enforcement: If enforcement is
suspended, the COTP will cause a
notice of the suspension of enforcement
by all appropriate means to be given the
widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification may include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners. Such
notification will include the date and
time that enforcement is suspended as
well as the date and time that
enforcement will resume.
(2) Violations of this regulated
navigation area may be reported to the
COTP Sector Northern New England, at
(207) 767–0303 or on VHF–Channel 16.
Dated: December 22, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–175 Filed 1–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:49 Jan 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0801; FRL–9616–6]
1411
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. Background
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 36852), EPA
established a health-based PM2.5
NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic
meter (mg/m3) based on a 3-year average
of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the annual
PM2.5 NAAQS’’ or ‘‘the annual
standard’’). At that time, EPA also
established a 24-hour standard of 65
mg/m3 (the ‘‘1997 24-hour standard’’).
See, 40 CFR 50.7. On January 5, 2005
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
(70 FR 944), EPA published its air
Agency (EPA).
quality designations and classifications
ACTION: Final rule.
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS based upon
air quality monitoring data from those
SUMMARY: EPA is making determinations
monitors for calendar years 2001–2003.
that the Metropolitan Washington,
These designations became effective on
District of Columbia-Maryland-Virginia
April 5, 2005. The Metropolitan
(DC-MD-VA) fine particle (PM2.5)
Washington, DC-MD-VA and the
nonattainment area and the
Martinsburg-Hagerstown, West Virginia- Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD
nonattainment areas were designated
Maryland (WV-MD) PM2.5
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS during this designations
as ‘‘Areas’’) have attained the 1997
process. See, 40 CFR part 81.309 (the
annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air
District), 40 CFR 81.321 (Maryland), 40
Quality Standard (NAAQS) by their
CFR 81.347 (Virginia), and 40 CFR
applicable attainment date of April 5,
81.349 (West Virginia). The
2010. These determinations are based
Metropolitan Washington, DC–MD–VA
upon complete, quality-assured, and
certified ambient air monitoring data for 1997 annual PM2.5 nonattainment area
consists of the District of Columbia (the
the 2007–2009 monitoring period. EPA
District), a Northern Virginia portion
is finding these Areas to be in
(Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and
attainment, in accordance with the
Prince William Counties and the cities
requirements of the Clean Air Act
of Alexandria, Falls Church, Fairfax,
(CAA).
Manassas, and Manassas Park), and
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and
effective on February 9, 2012.
Prince George’s Counties in Maryland.
The Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
1997 annual PM2.5 nonattainment area
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0801. All consists of Washington County in
documents in the docket are listed in
Maryland and Berkley County in West
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Virginia.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
EPA previously made clean data
some information is not publicly
determinations related to the 1997
available, i.e., confidential business
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for each of these
information (CBI) or other information
Areas pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c).
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Determinations were made for the
Certain other material, such as
Metropolitan Washington Area, DC-MDcopyrighted material, is not placed on
VA on January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1146)
the Internet and will be publicly
and for the Martinsburg-Hagerstown,
available only in hard copy form.
WV-MD Area on November 20, 2009 (74
Publicly available docket materials are
FR 60199). These clean data
available either electronically through
determinations remain in effect.
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
Under CAA section 179(c), EPA is
public inspection during normal
required to make a determination that a
business hours at the Air Protection
nonattainment area has attained by its
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection applicable attainment date, and publish
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
that determination in the Federal
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Register. The determination of
attainment is not equivalent to a
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
redesignation, and the state must still
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
meet the statutory requirements for
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; District
of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and
West Virginia; Determinations of
Attainment of the 1997 Fine Particle
Standard for the Metropolitan
Washington, DC-MD-VA and
Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD
Nonattainment Areas
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1407-1411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-175]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1097]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Memorial Bridge Construction,
Piscataqua River, Portsmouth, NH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard is establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable waters of the Piscataqua River
under and surrounding the Memorial Bridge between Portsmouth, NH and
Kittery, ME. This temporary interim rule is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on the navigable waters during bridge demolition and
replacement construction operations. This rule implements certain
safety measures, including speed restrictions and the temporary
suspension of vessel traffic during construction operations that could
be hazardous to nearby vessels.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR from January 10, 2012 through
December 31, 2013. This rule is effective with actual notice for
purposes of enforcement from December 22, 2011 through December 31,
2013. Public comments will be accepted and reviewed by the Coast Guard
through December 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-1097 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1097 and are available online by
going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1097 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Terence Leahy of
the Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Northern New
England; telephone (207) 767-0398, email Terence.O.Leahy@uscg.mil or
Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt of the Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard First District, email
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil; telephone (617) 223-8385. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
[[Page 1408]]
comments received will be posted, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have
provided.
As this interim rule will be in effect before the end of the
comment period, the Coast Guard will evaluate and revise this rule as
necessary to address significant public comments.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-1097), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-1097'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change this rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-1097'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting in connection with the
public comment period for this interim rule. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Although it was not held specifically to solicit public comments on
this interim rule and was not announced in the Federal Register, the
New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT) held a public
waterway user meeting on November 29, 2011, at the Portsmouth, NH City
Hall Building where waterway closures and bridge demolition plans were
discussed. No comments or concerns were noted during that meeting that
would impact the drafting of this rule.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this interim rule without prior Federal
Register notice pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of the
public during demolition of the existing Memorial Bridge and subsequent
replacement, and it would be contrary to the public interest to delay
both demolition and construction.
The need for waterway closures was not brought to the attention of
the Coast Guard until November 13, 2011 when the New Hampshire
Department of Transportation (NHDOT) requested a complete waterway
closure for a 3-day period beginning January 30, 2012. It is
impracticable to issue an NPRM and take public comment before January
2012, when the bridge construction that necessitates creation of a
regulated navigation area (RNA) is scheduled to begin, and when the
bridge is at risk of immediate failure. Following the conclusion of a
lengthy bridge study, NHDOT determined that it was immediately
necessary to replace the existing Memorial Bridge due to concerns that
the existing structure may suffer a catastrophic failure. A bridge
failure could inhibit commercial vessels from reaching facilities
upstream on the Piscataqua River should the center lift span become
stuck in the down position, blocking the main navigation channel. This
would have a significant negative economic impact.
Additionally, any delay or cancellation of the ongoing bridge
construction plans would be contrary to public interest as the bridge's
failure could cause regionally significant economic, environmental, and
safety impacts. The Coast Guard has determined that the prompt
remediation of the existing structure will mitigate the threat of a
possible catastrophic failure.
Once the Coast Guard received notification of these plans on
November 13, 2011 by NHDOT, and established the need for waterway
closures and speed restrictions for vessel traffic, it was necessary
for the Coast Guard to move quickly to protect public safety by
safeguarding both the mariners and construction workers during the
bridge's demolition and construction. The dynamic nature of the
construction process and multitude of construction vessels necessitates
that all mariners navigate at a safe speed within the RNA in accordance
with Rule 6 of the Inland Navigation Rules, as the barge and
construction equipment configuration may change on a daily basis. In
order to address any further public concerns, this rule is available
for public comment until December 31, 2013. The Coast Guard will
publish an amended rule if necessary to address public concerns.
For the reasons discussed, delaying the project is contrary to the
public interest, and notice and comment period are impracticable. Under
5 U.S.C.
[[Page 1409]]
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this interim rule is to ensure the safe transit of
vessels in the area, and to protect all persons, vessels, and the
marine environment during demolition and reconstruction operations for
the duration of the Memorial Bridge construction, from January 30, 2012
through December 31, 2013.
Discussion of Rule
Due to unanticipated structural failure of the current Memorial
Bridge, plans were put in place to demolish the existing bridge
structure as quickly as possible and build a new bridge in the current
location. The construction of the Memorial Bridge involves large
machinery and construction vessel operations above and in the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River. The ongoing operations are, by their
nature, hazardous and pose risks both to recreational and commercial
traffic as well as the construction crew. In order to mitigate the
inherent risks involved in the construction, it is necessary to control
vessel movement through the area.
Heavy-lift operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake
from passing vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to
construction workers. In order to minimize such unexpected or
uncontrolled movement of water, the RNA will limit vessel speed and
wake of all vessels operating in the vicinity of the bridge
construction zone. This will be achieved by enforcing a five (5) knots
speed limit and ``NO WAKE'' zone in the vicinity of the construction as
well as providing a means to suspend all vessel traffic for emergent
situations that pose imminent threat to waterway users in the area. The
RNA will also protect vessels desiring to transit the area by ensuring
that vessels are only permitted to transit when it is safe to do so.
The Coast Guard has discussed this project at length with the NHDOT
to identify if the project can be completed without channel closures
and, if possible, what impact that would have on the project timeline.
Through these discussions, it became clear that while the majority of
construction activities during the span of this project would not
require waterway closures, there are certain tasks that can only be
completed in the channel and will require closing the waterway. At
present, NHDOT has not submitted a complete plan for waterway closures
due to the expeditious manner that promulgated drafting this regulated
navigation area.
On a case-by-case basis, depending on the construction schedule,
NHDOT may request a waterway closure on various dates from January 30,
2012 through December 31, 2013. As discussed below, NHDOT will notify
the Coast Guard of planned activities as soon as possible.
The COTP Sector Northern New England will cause notice of
enforcement, suspension of enforcement, or closure of this regulated
navigation area to be made by all appropriate means to ensure the
widest distribution among the affected segments of the public. Such
means of notification will include, but are not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. In addition, the COTP
maintains a telephone line that is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a
week. The public can obtain information concerning enforcement of the
regulated navigation area by contacting Coast Guard Sector Northern New
England Command Center at (207) 767-0303.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
this regulated navigation area requires vessels to reduce speed through
600 yards of the Piscataqua River, therefore causing only a minimal
delay to a vessel's transit. In addition, periods when the regulated
navigation area is closed to all traffic are expected to be short in
duration, and we expect to give advance notice of such closures.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of marinas, charter
fishing vessels, commercial fishing vessels, facilities servicing deep
draft vessels, tugboat operators, and recreational vessels who intend
to transit in those portions of the Piscataqua River during the
effective period. Alternatively, smaller vessel traffic can transit to
the north of Badgers Island and through the backchannel at Seavey
Island to avoid any delays caused by closures to the waterway around
the Memorial Bridge. In addition, periods when the regulated navigation
area is closed to all traffic are expected to be short in duration, and
we expect to give advance notice of such closures.
This regulation may have some impact on the public, but the
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: it
requires vessels to reduce speed through 600 yards of the Piscataqua
River, therefore causing only a minimal delay to a vessel's transit.
Many parties that have the potential to be affected have been involved
in the discussions and have made plans to work around the closure
times. We will use various appropriate means to inform the public
before, during, and at the conclusion of any RNA enforcement period.
The RNA will apply to the width of the Piscataqua River within a
300 yard radius of a position specified in the regulatory text, under
and surrounding the Memorial Bridge. During full closures to traffic
under the Memorial Bridge, vessels may be allowed to pass through the
regulated area with the permission of the COTP.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121),
[[Page 1410]]
we offer to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-(888) REG-
FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of an RNA. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Any comments received concerning environmental impacts will
be considered and changes made to the environmental analysis checklist
and categorical exclusion determination as appropriate.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-1097 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-1097 Regulated Navigation Area; Memorial Bridge
Construction, Piscataqua River, Portsmouth, NH.
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters, surface to bottom, on the Piscataqua River
within a 300 yard radius of position 43[deg]04'46'' N, 70[deg]45'10'' W
in the vicinity of the Memorial Bridge construction zone between
Portsmouth, NH and Badgers Island in Kittery, ME.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and
165.13 apply within the RNA, and in addition:
(2) In accordance with the general regulations, entry into or
movement
[[Page 1411]]
within this zone, during periods of enforcement, is prohibited unless
authorized by Captain of the Port (COTP) Sector Northern New England.
(3) A speed limit of five (5) knots will be in effect within the
regulated area. All vessels must proceed through the area with caution
and operate in such a manner as to produce no wake.
(4) Vessels must comply with all directions given to them by the
COTP Sector Northern New England or his on-scene representative. The
``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been designated by the
COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene representative may be on
a Coast Guard vessel; New Hampshire State Police, Maine State Police,
or other designated craft; or may be on shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
(5) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel must proceed
as directed.
(6) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR Subchapter E, Inland Navigational Rules)
remain in effect within the regulated area and should be strictly
followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement. This regulated navigation area is enforceable 24
hours a day from December 22, 2011 until December 31, 2013.
(1) Notice of suspension of enforcement: If enforcement is
suspended, the COTP will cause a notice of the suspension of
enforcement by all appropriate means to be given the widest publicity
among the affected segments of the public. Such means of notification
may include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and
Local Notice to Mariners. Such notification will include the date and
time that enforcement is suspended as well as the date and time that
enforcement will resume.
(2) Violations of this regulated navigation area may be reported to
the COTP Sector Northern New England, at (207) 767-0303 or on VHF-
Channel 16.
Dated: December 22, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012-175 Filed 1-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P