Provisional Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizens, 1040-1043 [2012-140]
Download as PDF
1040
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 5
Monday, January 9, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 212
RIN 1615–ZB10
Provisional Waivers of Inadmissibility
for Certain Immediate Relatives of U.S.
Citizens
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) intends to
change its current process for filing and
adjudication of certain applications for
waivers of inadmissibility filed in
connection with an immediate relative
immigrant visa application. Specifically,
USCIS is considering regulatory changes
that will allow certain immediate
relatives of U.S. citizens to request
provisional waivers under section
212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1952, as amended
(INA or Act), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(v),
prior to departing the United States for
consular processing of their immigrant
visa applications. An alien would be
able to obtain such a waiver only if a
Petition for Alien Relative, Form I–130,
is filed by a U.S. citizen on his or her
behalf and that petition has been
approved, thereby classifying the alien
as an ‘‘immediate relative’’ for purposes
of the immigration laws, and he or she
demonstrates that the denial of the
waiver would result in extreme
hardship to the alien’s U.S. citizen
spouse or parent ‘‘qualifying relative.’’
The qualifying relative for purposes of
the waiver is not necessarily the
immediate relative who filed the
immigrant visa petition on the alien
relative’s behalf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roselyn Brown-Frei, Office of Policy
and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529–
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
2099, telephone (202) 272–1470 (this is
not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Overview
The proposed process is intended to
reduce the time that U.S. citizens are
separated from immediate relatives who
are required to remain outside the
United States for immigrant visa
application processing and during the
adjudication of waivers of
inadmissibility. Through this change,
USCIS does not intend to modify the
standard for assessing eligibility for
these waivers, including whether the
denial of the waiver would result in
extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen
spouse or parent (‘‘qualifying relative’’).
For purposes of the waiver under
section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act, a
‘‘qualifying relative’’ is a U.S. citizen
spouse or parent or a lawful permanent
resident spouse or parent who would
suffer extreme hardship if their relative
were not allowed to immigrate. For
purposes of this provisional waiver
program, DHS intends to limit who may
participate in this program to immediate
relatives who can demonstrate extreme
hardship to a U.S. citizen spouse or
parent. Even if they obtain a provisional
waiver, eligible aliens who are required
to obtain a visa through consular
processing would still be required to
depart from the United States to apply
for an immigrant visa. The purpose of
the new process is to reduce the time
that U.S. families remain separated
while their relative proceeds through
the immigrant visa process.
Certain grounds of inadmissibility can
bar aliens from being admitted to the
United States or obtaining an immigrant
visa, preventing U.S. citizens from
reuniting with their immediate relatives.
However, the Secretary of Homeland
Security, through USCIS, may waive
some of those grounds. An alien who is
subject to one or more grounds of
inadmissibility must obtain a waiver, if
available, from USCIS before he or she
may be issued an immigrant visa by a
Department of State consular officer at
a U.S. embassy or consulate overseas.
The bars to admission under section
212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II) of the INA, 8
U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II), based
on accrual of unlawful presence in the
United States, comprise one such
ground. Typically, under current
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
processes, aliens who are immediate
relatives of U.S. citizens applying for
immigrant visas at Department of State
consular posts must apply for waivers of
unlawful presence while outside the
United States after a finding of
inadmissibility is made by a Department
of State consular officer in conjunction
with their immigrant visa applications.
As a result, U.S. citizen petitioners are
often separated for long periods of time
from their immediate relatives who are
applying for immigrant visas and have
accrued a certain period of unlawful
presence in the United States. This
revised process, which eliminates the
time-consuming interchange between
the Department of State and USCIS,
would significantly reduce the amount
of time that American families will be
separated from their immediate
relatives. USCIS also believes that
efficiencies can be gained through this
revised process for both the U.S.
Government and most applicants.
USCIS intends to limit consideration
for the provisional waiver to aliens who
qualify for classification as immediate
relatives of U.S. citizens, who have a
U.S. citizen spouse or parent who
would suffer extreme hardship if the
waiver were denied, and for whom the
sole basis for inadmissibility is unlawful
presence in the United States of more
than 180 days. USCIS would grant a
provisional waiver if the alien meets the
eligibility requirements described in
this Notice, including demonstrating
that the applicant’s qualifying U.S.
citizen spouse or parent would suffer
extreme hardship and that the applicant
warrants a favorable exercise of
discretion. The provisional waiver
would be granted before the alien leaves
the United States to attend his or her
immigrant visa interview with a
consular officer. The provisional waiver,
however, would not become effective
unless and until the alien departs from
the United States. If the alien is
otherwise eligible for the immigrant
visa, the consular officer may then
approve the issuance of the visa so that
the alien may proceed to immigrate to
the United States for permanent
residence.
This notice of intent generally
describes the proposal that USCIS is
considering. USCIS will further
develop, and ultimately finalize, this
proposal through the rulemaking
process. This effort is consistent with
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13563’s call for
agencies to ‘‘consider how best to
promote retrospective analysis of rules
that may be outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome,
and to modify, streamline, expand, or
repeal them in accordance with what
has been learned.’’ Do not send an
application requesting a provisional
waiver under the procedures under
consideration in this notice. Any
application requesting this new process
will be rejected, and the application
package returned to the applicant,
including any fees, until a final rule is
issued and the change becomes
effective.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Authority
The Homeland Security Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–296, section 102, 116
Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 112, and section 103
of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1103, charge the
Secretary of Homeland Security with
administration and enforcement of the
immigration and naturalization laws.
The Secretary would effectuate these
proposed changes under the broad
authority to administer the Department
of Homeland Security and the
authorities provided under the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, the
immigration and nationality laws, and
other delegated authority.
C. Grounds of Inadmissibility
U.S. immigration laws provide
mechanisms for U.S. citizens to petition
for certain family members for
admission to the United States for
purposes of family reunification. At the
same time, however, the immigration
laws prescribe acts, conditions, and
conduct that bar aliens, including
immediate relatives of U.S. citizens,
from being admitted to the United States
or obtaining an immigrant visa. Such
acts, conditions, and conduct include
certain criminal offenses, public health
concerns, fraud, misrepresentation,
failure to possess proper documents,
accrual of more than 180 days of
unlawful presence in the United States,
and terrorism. The grounds of
inadmissibility are set forth in section
212(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a).
The Secretary of Homeland Security
has the discretion to waive certain
inadmissibility grounds, upon the filing
of a request by an alien who meets the
relevant statutory requirements. If the
Secretary, through USCIS, grants such a
waiver, the waived ground will no
longer bar the alien’s admission,
readmission, or immigrant visa
eligibility based on that specific ground
of inadmissibility.
One of the inadmissibility grounds is
described in section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i). Under
part (I) of this provision, an alien who
was unlawfully present in the United
States for more than 180 days but less
than one year, and who then departs
voluntarily from the United States
before the commencement of removal
proceedings, will be inadmissible for
three years from the date of departure.
Under part (II) of the same provision, an
alien who was unlawfully present for
one year or more and then departs
before, during, or after removal
proceedings, will be inadmissible for
ten years from the date of the departure.
The three- and ten-year unlawful
presence bars do not take effect unless
and until an alien departs from the
United States. By statute, aliens are not
considered to be accruing unlawful
presence for purposes of section
212(a)(9)(B)(i) if they fall into certain
categories. For example, aliens do not
accrue unlawful presence while they are
under 18 years of age. See INA section
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(I), 8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(iii)(I). Similarly,
individuals with pending asylum claims
generally are not considered to be
accruing unlawful presence while their
applications are pending. See INA
section 212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(II), 8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(iii)(II). Battered women
and children and victims of a severe
form of trafficking in persons are not
subject to the section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)
ground of inadmissibility at all if they
demonstrate that there was a substantial
connection between their victimization
and their unlawful presence. See INA
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(IV)–(V), 8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(iii)(IV)–(V). Aliens who
are subject to the unlawful presence
bars must apply for and be granted a
waiver in order to receive an immigrant
visa and be admitted to the United
States.
The Secretary of Homeland Security
has the discretion to waive the threeand ten-year unlawful presence bars if
the alien is seeking admission as an
immigrant and if the alien demonstrates
that the denial of his or her admission
to the United States would cause
‘‘extreme hardship’’ to the alien’s
qualifying relative. See INA section
212(a)(9)(B)(v), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(v).
The qualifying relative for purposes of
the waiver is not necessarily the relative
who filed the immigrant visa petition on
the alien relative’s behalf. For example,
an alien applicant’s U.S. citizen spouse
may have filed the immigrant visa
petition on the applicant’s behalf, but
the applicant’s unlawful presence
waiver application may be based on
extreme hardship to the applicant’s U.S.
citizen parent. Because the granting of a
waiver is discretionary, the alien also
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1041
must establish that he or she merits a
favorable exercise of discretion.
D. Current Process and Problems
An alien who must apply for
permanent residence through consular
immigrant visa processing outside the
United States must appear for an
interview with a Department of State
consular officer abroad. Currently, if the
consular officer determines that the
alien is subject to the three- or ten-year
bar, the consular officer advises the
alien that he or she is eligible to apply
for a section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) waiver by
filing a Form I–601, Application for
Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility,
with USCIS. Under current rules, an
individual is not permitted to apply for
the section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) waiver before
the consular officer has made the
inadmissibility determination.
Once the Form I–601 is filed, in most
cases, the file is transferred from the
Department of State to USCIS. USCIS
adjudicates that waiver request while
the alien remains outside the United
States and awaits a decision. If USCIS
approves the waiver, USCIS notifies the
Department of State, and the
Department of State may then issue the
immigrant visa if the applicant is
otherwise eligible. If the waiver is
denied, the alien may appeal the
decision to the USCIS Administrative
Appeals Office and, if the denial is
upheld, the alien must remain outside
the United States for three or ten years
before being able to reapply for an
immigrant visa. However, a denial does
not preclude the alien from filing
another Form I–601 in the future.
The three- and ten-year unlawful
presence bars under section
212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II) of the Act do
not apply unless and until the applicant
departs from the United States. At the
same time, many aliens who would
trigger these bars if they depart from the
United States are, for other reasons,
statutorily ineligible to apply for
adjustment of status to lawful
permanent residence while remaining in
the United States. Consequently, they
must depart to regularize their
immigration status by applying for their
immigrant visas at a U.S. embassy or
consulate abroad. The action required to
regularize the status of an alien,
departure from the United States,
therefore is the very action that triggers
the section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)
inadmissibility that bars that alien from
obtaining the immigrant visa.
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
1042
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
II. Proposed Waiver Process
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Proposed Process
The proposed change would create a
more streamlined and efficient process
for waiver applicants whose sole
inadmissibility ground is unlawful
presence, while simultaneously
minimizing family separation. If the
waiver determination, with respect to
unlawful presence, were made in
advance of the immigrant visa interview
and the applicant otherwise were
eligible for the immigrant visa, the
consular officer could simply issue the
immigrant visa at the time of the visa
interview. The new process thus will
reduce the movement of the case back
and forth between the Department of
State and USCIS, which significantly
prolongs the overall process and
increases the time that U.S. citizens are
separated from their immediate family
members. Additionally, the new process
would reduce U.S. Government costs
associated with the movement of cases,
and provide a more efficient visa
process overall.
B. Affected Visa Categories
USCIS intends to limit this process
change to aliens who are immediate
relatives of U.S. citizens, as defined in
section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Act, 8
U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), who must depart
from the United States to obtain
immigrant visas, and whose U.S. citizen
spouse or parent would suffer extreme
hardship if the applicant were denied
admission to the United States. The
term ‘‘immediate relative’’ means the
spouse, parent or child (unmarried and
under 21 years old) of a U.S. citizen,
except that, in the case of a parent, the
U.S. citizen son or daughter petitioning
for an immigrant visa must be at least
21 years old. Certain self-petitioners
(i.e., widows/widowers of U.S. citizen
and their minor unmarried children)
may also be considered immediate
relatives. See INA 201(b)(2)(A)(i), 8
U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i). Individuals
applying for a waiver must also
establish that the grant of the
provisional waiver is warranted as a
matter of discretion.
Because the focus on family
unification of U.S. citizens and their
immediate relatives is consistent with
Congress’ prioritization in the
immigration laws, USCIS has identified
immediate relatives of U.S. citizens as
the class of aliens to consider for this
procedural change. In addition,
Congress did not set an annual
limitation for the number of immediate
relatives of U.S. citizens admitted to the
United States. Therefore, these relatives
always have an immigrant visa
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
immediately available, and the visa thus
can be processed immediately upon
approval.
C. Ground of Inadmissibility Considered
for Provisional Waiver
USCIS intends to further limit this
procedural change to waivers filed by
immediate relatives of U.S. citizens
whose only ground of inadmissibility is
the three- or ten-year unlawful presence
bar under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II)
of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or
(II). Aliens who require waivers for one
or more additional grounds of
inadmissibility, such as fraud or willful
misrepresentation (section 212(i)
waiver) or certain criminal offenses
(section 212(h) waiver), in conjunction
with their immigrant visa applications
must continue to file a Form I–601
while outside of the United States in
accordance with the existing process.
To qualify for the provisional waiver
process, an applicant must establish not
only that he or she is the immediate
relative of a U.S. citizen, but also that
denial of the waiver would result in
extreme hardship to a qualifying
relative. The qualifying relative must be
a U.S. citizen spouse or parent but does
not need to be the U.S. citizen
petitioner. Only extreme hardship from
the denial of a waiver to a qualifying
U.S. citizen relative makes an alien
eligible for the provisional waiver
process; extreme hardship to the alien
himself or herself as a result of denial
does not make the alien eligible. An
alien whose waiver application is based
on extreme hardship to a lawful
permanent resident spouse or parent
must continue to apply for the waiver
from outside the United States in
accordance with existing procedures.
Eligible aliens, furthermore, must be the
beneficiaries of petitions classifying
them as immediate relatives of U.S.
citizens, and thus have visas
immediately available. Because the
granting of a waiver is discretionary,
eligible aliens also must establish that
they merit a favorable exercise of
discretion. The standard for assessing
whether denial of the waiver would
result in extreme hardship to the U.S.
citizen spouse or parent of such aliens
will remain unchanged.
D. Adjudication and Decisions
After filing the Form I–601 with
USCIS, DHS envisions that an alien
seeking a provisional waiver would be
required to undergo biometrics
collection. USCIS would deny the
application for a provisional waiver if
other possible grounds of
inadmissibility are found or arise during
adjudication.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If the application is approved, USCIS
would notify the Department of State
and the alien of the provisional
approval. In all instances, a Department
of State consular officer would make the
formal inadmissibility finding during or
following the immigrant visa interview
abroad, and if no other grounds of
inadmissibility arise, the provisional
waiver under section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of
the Act granted by USCIS would
facilitate immigrant visa issuance. If,
however, the consular officer finds
during adjudication of the immigrant
visa application that the individual is
subject to another ground of
inadmissibility that can be waived, the
alien would need to file another waiver
application with USCIS.
This process would not alter the
requirement that an alien depart from
the United States to apply for an
immigrant visa. An alien who receives
a provisional waiver under section
212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act for the threeor ten-year bar under section
212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II) of the Act would
not gain the benefit of such waiver
unless he or she departs from the United
States. The departure from the United
States would have to take place to
activate the provisional waiver under
section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act.
E. Excluded Visa Categories
Aliens who would not be eligible for
this provisional waiver adjudication
process and aliens who are denied
provisional approval of their waiver
requests would continue to follow
current agency processes for filing and
adjudication of waiver requests. Aliens
who fall under any other family- or
employment-based or other visa
category or whose section
212(a)(9)(B)(v) waiver eligibility would
be based on extreme hardship to a
lawful permanent resident alien relative
would not be considered for provisional
waivers. Aliens who are subject to other
grounds of inadmissibility or removal
also would not be considered for
provisional waivers. Further, aliens
with waiver applications under section
212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act currently
pending in either administrative or
judicial proceedings would not qualify
for this new process.
III. Conclusion
This document outlines the key
elements of USCIS’s proposed change to
its current process for filing and
adjudication of waivers of
inadmissibility for unlawful presence
for immediate relative of U.S. citizens.
The focus on family unification of U.S.
citizens and their immediate relatives is
consistent with Congress’s prioritization
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
in the immigration laws; the new
process will reduce the movement of the
case back and forth between the
Department of State and USCIS, which
significantly prolongs the overall
process and increases the time that U.S.
citizens are separated from their
immediate family members. The
proposed change would affect only
when and where certain aliens can
apply for waivers of the unlawful
presence grounds of inadmissibility; it
would not change the extreme hardship
standard for evaluating eligibility for the
waiver nor would it change whether
aliens subject to these grounds of
inadmissibility must depart the U.S. to
apply for their immigrant visas. USCIS
plans to effectuate this proposal through
the regulatory process. USCIS will issue
a proposed rulemaking that will explain
the proposal in further detail and that
will invite comment from all interested
parties. Note: Do not send an
application requesting a provisional
waiver under the procedures under
consideration in this notice. Any
application requesting this new process
will be rejected and the application
package returned to the applicant,
including any fees, until a final rule is
issued and the change becomes
effective.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2012–140 Filed 1–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0945; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NE–18–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell
International Inc. Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products identified above. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report
of a quality escape of about 8,000 2nd
stage low pressure turbine (LPT2) rotor
blades, manufactured by Honeywell
Chihuahua Manufacturing Operation
since 2009. This proposed AD would
require removing and inspecting certain
LPT2 rotor blades. During LPT rotor
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
acceleration, these blades may contact
and damage the 3rd stage LPT (LPT3)
nozzle seal carrier, which may
subsequently fatigue and contact the
adjacent rotor and damage the rotor.
Also, these blades could deform the
blade retainers, which could lead to
blade movement that may cause rotor
damage. We are proposing this AD to
correct an unsafe condition caused by
these blades installed on these engines.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Honeywell
International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street,
Phoenix, AZ 85034–2802; web site:
https://portal.honeywell.com; or call
Honeywell toll free at phone: (800) 601–
3099 (U.S./Canada) or (602) 365–3099
(International Direct). You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (781) 238–
7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712–4137; phone: (562) 627–5246;
fax: (562) 627–5210; email:
joseph.costa@faa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1043
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2011–0945; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NE–18–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
During a routine replacement of LPT2
rotor blades, part numbers (P/Ns)
3075424–2 and 3075424–3, the new
LPT2 rotor blades, P/Ns 3075424–2 and
3075424–3, were seen to have aft
discouragers that were approximately
0.020 inch (0.51 mm) longer than the
existing LPT2 rotor blades, P/Ns
3075424–2 and 3075424–3. Further
investigation revealed that the aft
discouragers of the new LPT2 rotor
blades, P/Ns 3075424–2 and 3075424–3,
did not meet the type design
requirements. That investigation also
found that only LPT2 rotor blades P/Ns
3075424–2 and 3075424–3,
manufactured from specific machining
lots, are affected. P/N 3075424–2
suspect lots were manufactured between
March 2009 and September 2010,
inclusive. P/N 3075424–3 suspect lots
were manufactured between July 2010
and September 2010, inclusive.
During LPT rotor acceleration, these
blades may contact and damage the
LPT3 nozzle seal carrier, which may
subsequently fatigue and contact the
adjacent rotor and damage the rotor.
Also, these blades could deform the
blade retainers, which could lead to
blade movement that may cause rotor
damage.
We have not received any reports of
engine in-flight shutdowns due to these
blades being in service.
These blades may damage the rotor.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in damage to these blades
installed on these engines.
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1040-1043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-140]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 1040]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 212
RIN 1615-ZB10
Provisional Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate
Relatives of U.S. Citizens
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) intends to
change its current process for filing and adjudication of certain
applications for waivers of inadmissibility filed in connection with an
immediate relative immigrant visa application. Specifically, USCIS is
considering regulatory changes that will allow certain immediate
relatives of U.S. citizens to request provisional waivers under section
212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as
amended (INA or Act), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), prior to departing the
United States for consular processing of their immigrant visa
applications. An alien would be able to obtain such a waiver only if a
Petition for Alien Relative, Form I-130, is filed by a U.S. citizen on
his or her behalf and that petition has been approved, thereby
classifying the alien as an ``immediate relative'' for purposes of the
immigration laws, and he or she demonstrates that the denial of the
waiver would result in extreme hardship to the alien's U.S. citizen
spouse or parent ``qualifying relative.'' The qualifying relative for
purposes of the waiver is not necessarily the immediate relative who
filed the immigrant visa petition on the alien relative's behalf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roselyn Brown-Frei, Office of Policy
and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529-
2099, telephone (202) 272-1470 (this is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Overview
The proposed process is intended to reduce the time that U.S.
citizens are separated from immediate relatives who are required to
remain outside the United States for immigrant visa application
processing and during the adjudication of waivers of inadmissibility.
Through this change, USCIS does not intend to modify the standard for
assessing eligibility for these waivers, including whether the denial
of the waiver would result in extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen spouse
or parent (``qualifying relative''). For purposes of the waiver under
section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act, a ``qualifying relative'' is a U.S.
citizen spouse or parent or a lawful permanent resident spouse or
parent who would suffer extreme hardship if their relative were not
allowed to immigrate. For purposes of this provisional waiver program,
DHS intends to limit who may participate in this program to immediate
relatives who can demonstrate extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen spouse
or parent. Even if they obtain a provisional waiver, eligible aliens
who are required to obtain a visa through consular processing would
still be required to depart from the United States to apply for an
immigrant visa. The purpose of the new process is to reduce the time
that U.S. families remain separated while their relative proceeds
through the immigrant visa process.
Certain grounds of inadmissibility can bar aliens from being
admitted to the United States or obtaining an immigrant visa,
preventing U.S. citizens from reuniting with their immediate relatives.
However, the Secretary of Homeland Security, through USCIS, may waive
some of those grounds. An alien who is subject to one or more grounds
of inadmissibility must obtain a waiver, if available, from USCIS
before he or she may be issued an immigrant visa by a Department of
State consular officer at a U.S. embassy or consulate overseas.
The bars to admission under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II) of
the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II), based on accrual of
unlawful presence in the United States, comprise one such ground.
Typically, under current processes, aliens who are immediate relatives
of U.S. citizens applying for immigrant visas at Department of State
consular posts must apply for waivers of unlawful presence while
outside the United States after a finding of inadmissibility is made by
a Department of State consular officer in conjunction with their
immigrant visa applications. As a result, U.S. citizen petitioners are
often separated for long periods of time from their immediate relatives
who are applying for immigrant visas and have accrued a certain period
of unlawful presence in the United States. This revised process, which
eliminates the time-consuming interchange between the Department of
State and USCIS, would significantly reduce the amount of time that
American families will be separated from their immediate relatives.
USCIS also believes that efficiencies can be gained through this
revised process for both the U.S. Government and most applicants.
USCIS intends to limit consideration for the provisional waiver to
aliens who qualify for classification as immediate relatives of U.S.
citizens, who have a U.S. citizen spouse or parent who would suffer
extreme hardship if the waiver were denied, and for whom the sole basis
for inadmissibility is unlawful presence in the United States of more
than 180 days. USCIS would grant a provisional waiver if the alien
meets the eligibility requirements described in this Notice, including
demonstrating that the applicant's qualifying U.S. citizen spouse or
parent would suffer extreme hardship and that the applicant warrants a
favorable exercise of discretion. The provisional waiver would be
granted before the alien leaves the United States to attend his or her
immigrant visa interview with a consular officer. The provisional
waiver, however, would not become effective unless and until the alien
departs from the United States. If the alien is otherwise eligible for
the immigrant visa, the consular officer may then approve the issuance
of the visa so that the alien may proceed to immigrate to the United
States for permanent residence.
This notice of intent generally describes the proposal that USCIS
is considering. USCIS will further develop, and ultimately finalize,
this proposal through the rulemaking process. This effort is consistent
with
[[Page 1041]]
Executive Order 13563's call for agencies to ``consider how best to
promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify,
streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been
learned.'' Do not send an application requesting a provisional waiver
under the procedures under consideration in this notice. Any
application requesting this new process will be rejected, and the
application package returned to the applicant, including any fees,
until a final rule is issued and the change becomes effective.
B. Authority
The Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, section 102,
116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 112, and section 103 of the INA, 8 U.S.C.
1103, charge the Secretary of Homeland Security with administration and
enforcement of the immigration and naturalization laws. The Secretary
would effectuate these proposed changes under the broad authority to
administer the Department of Homeland Security and the authorities
provided under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the immigration and
nationality laws, and other delegated authority.
C. Grounds of Inadmissibility
U.S. immigration laws provide mechanisms for U.S. citizens to
petition for certain family members for admission to the United States
for purposes of family reunification. At the same time, however, the
immigration laws prescribe acts, conditions, and conduct that bar
aliens, including immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, from being
admitted to the United States or obtaining an immigrant visa. Such
acts, conditions, and conduct include certain criminal offenses, public
health concerns, fraud, misrepresentation, failure to possess proper
documents, accrual of more than 180 days of unlawful presence in the
United States, and terrorism. The grounds of inadmissibility are set
forth in section 212(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a).
The Secretary of Homeland Security has the discretion to waive
certain inadmissibility grounds, upon the filing of a request by an
alien who meets the relevant statutory requirements. If the Secretary,
through USCIS, grants such a waiver, the waived ground will no longer
bar the alien's admission, readmission, or immigrant visa eligibility
based on that specific ground of inadmissibility.
One of the inadmissibility grounds is described in section
212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i). Under part (I)
of this provision, an alien who was unlawfully present in the United
States for more than 180 days but less than one year, and who then
departs voluntarily from the United States before the commencement of
removal proceedings, will be inadmissible for three years from the date
of departure. Under part (II) of the same provision, an alien who was
unlawfully present for one year or more and then departs before,
during, or after removal proceedings, will be inadmissible for ten
years from the date of the departure.
The three- and ten-year unlawful presence bars do not take effect
unless and until an alien departs from the United States. By statute,
aliens are not considered to be accruing unlawful presence for purposes
of section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) if they fall into certain categories. For
example, aliens do not accrue unlawful presence while they are under 18
years of age. See INA section 212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(I), 8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(iii)(I). Similarly, individuals with pending asylum
claims generally are not considered to be accruing unlawful presence
while their applications are pending. See INA section
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(II), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(iii)(II). Battered
women and children and victims of a severe form of trafficking in
persons are not subject to the section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) ground of
inadmissibility at all if they demonstrate that there was a substantial
connection between their victimization and their unlawful presence. See
INA 212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(IV)-(V), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(iii)(IV)-(V).
Aliens who are subject to the unlawful presence bars must apply for and
be granted a waiver in order to receive an immigrant visa and be
admitted to the United States.
The Secretary of Homeland Security has the discretion to waive the
three- and ten-year unlawful presence bars if the alien is seeking
admission as an immigrant and if the alien demonstrates that the denial
of his or her admission to the United States would cause ``extreme
hardship'' to the alien's qualifying relative. See INA section
212(a)(9)(B)(v), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(v). The qualifying relative for
purposes of the waiver is not necessarily the relative who filed the
immigrant visa petition on the alien relative's behalf. For example, an
alien applicant's U.S. citizen spouse may have filed the immigrant visa
petition on the applicant's behalf, but the applicant's unlawful
presence waiver application may be based on extreme hardship to the
applicant's U.S. citizen parent. Because the granting of a waiver is
discretionary, the alien also must establish that he or she merits a
favorable exercise of discretion.
D. Current Process and Problems
An alien who must apply for permanent residence through consular
immigrant visa processing outside the United States must appear for an
interview with a Department of State consular officer abroad.
Currently, if the consular officer determines that the alien is subject
to the three- or ten-year bar, the consular officer advises the alien
that he or she is eligible to apply for a section 212(a)(9)(B)(v)
waiver by filing a Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of
Inadmissibility, with USCIS. Under current rules, an individual is not
permitted to apply for the section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) waiver before the
consular officer has made the inadmissibility determination.
Once the Form I-601 is filed, in most cases, the file is
transferred from the Department of State to USCIS. USCIS adjudicates
that waiver request while the alien remains outside the United States
and awaits a decision. If USCIS approves the waiver, USCIS notifies the
Department of State, and the Department of State may then issue the
immigrant visa if the applicant is otherwise eligible. If the waiver is
denied, the alien may appeal the decision to the USCIS Administrative
Appeals Office and, if the denial is upheld, the alien must remain
outside the United States for three or ten years before being able to
reapply for an immigrant visa. However, a denial does not preclude the
alien from filing another Form I-601 in the future.
The three- and ten-year unlawful presence bars under section
212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II) of the Act do not apply unless and until
the applicant departs from the United States. At the same time, many
aliens who would trigger these bars if they depart from the United
States are, for other reasons, statutorily ineligible to apply for
adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence while remaining in
the United States. Consequently, they must depart to regularize their
immigration status by applying for their immigrant visas at a U.S.
embassy or consulate abroad. The action required to regularize the
status of an alien, departure from the United States, therefore is the
very action that triggers the section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) inadmissibility
that bars that alien from obtaining the immigrant visa.
[[Page 1042]]
II. Proposed Waiver Process
A. Proposed Process
The proposed change would create a more streamlined and efficient
process for waiver applicants whose sole inadmissibility ground is
unlawful presence, while simultaneously minimizing family separation.
If the waiver determination, with respect to unlawful presence, were
made in advance of the immigrant visa interview and the applicant
otherwise were eligible for the immigrant visa, the consular officer
could simply issue the immigrant visa at the time of the visa
interview. The new process thus will reduce the movement of the case
back and forth between the Department of State and USCIS, which
significantly prolongs the overall process and increases the time that
U.S. citizens are separated from their immediate family members.
Additionally, the new process would reduce U.S. Government costs
associated with the movement of cases, and provide a more efficient
visa process overall.
B. Affected Visa Categories
USCIS intends to limit this process change to aliens who are
immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, as defined in section
201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), who must depart
from the United States to obtain immigrant visas, and whose U.S.
citizen spouse or parent would suffer extreme hardship if the applicant
were denied admission to the United States. The term ``immediate
relative'' means the spouse, parent or child (unmarried and under 21
years old) of a U.S. citizen, except that, in the case of a parent, the
U.S. citizen son or daughter petitioning for an immigrant visa must be
at least 21 years old. Certain self-petitioners (i.e., widows/widowers
of U.S. citizen and their minor unmarried children) may also be
considered immediate relatives. See INA 201(b)(2)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C.
1151(b)(2)(A)(i). Individuals applying for a waiver must also establish
that the grant of the provisional waiver is warranted as a matter of
discretion.
Because the focus on family unification of U.S. citizens and their
immediate relatives is consistent with Congress' prioritization in the
immigration laws, USCIS has identified immediate relatives of U.S.
citizens as the class of aliens to consider for this procedural change.
In addition, Congress did not set an annual limitation for the number
of immediate relatives of U.S. citizens admitted to the United States.
Therefore, these relatives always have an immigrant visa immediately
available, and the visa thus can be processed immediately upon
approval.
C. Ground of Inadmissibility Considered for Provisional Waiver
USCIS intends to further limit this procedural change to waivers
filed by immediate relatives of U.S. citizens whose only ground of
inadmissibility is the three- or ten-year unlawful presence bar under
section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II) of the Act, 8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II). Aliens who require waivers for one or more
additional grounds of inadmissibility, such as fraud or willful
misrepresentation (section 212(i) waiver) or certain criminal offenses
(section 212(h) waiver), in conjunction with their immigrant visa
applications must continue to file a Form I-601 while outside of the
United States in accordance with the existing process.
To qualify for the provisional waiver process, an applicant must
establish not only that he or she is the immediate relative of a U.S.
citizen, but also that denial of the waiver would result in extreme
hardship to a qualifying relative. The qualifying relative must be a
U.S. citizen spouse or parent but does not need to be the U.S. citizen
petitioner. Only extreme hardship from the denial of a waiver to a
qualifying U.S. citizen relative makes an alien eligible for the
provisional waiver process; extreme hardship to the alien himself or
herself as a result of denial does not make the alien eligible. An
alien whose waiver application is based on extreme hardship to a lawful
permanent resident spouse or parent must continue to apply for the
waiver from outside the United States in accordance with existing
procedures. Eligible aliens, furthermore, must be the beneficiaries of
petitions classifying them as immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, and
thus have visas immediately available. Because the granting of a waiver
is discretionary, eligible aliens also must establish that they merit a
favorable exercise of discretion. The standard for assessing whether
denial of the waiver would result in extreme hardship to the U.S.
citizen spouse or parent of such aliens will remain unchanged.
D. Adjudication and Decisions
After filing the Form I-601 with USCIS, DHS envisions that an alien
seeking a provisional waiver would be required to undergo biometrics
collection. USCIS would deny the application for a provisional waiver
if other possible grounds of inadmissibility are found or arise during
adjudication.
If the application is approved, USCIS would notify the Department
of State and the alien of the provisional approval. In all instances, a
Department of State consular officer would make the formal
inadmissibility finding during or following the immigrant visa
interview abroad, and if no other grounds of inadmissibility arise, the
provisional waiver under section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act granted by
USCIS would facilitate immigrant visa issuance. If, however, the
consular officer finds during adjudication of the immigrant visa
application that the individual is subject to another ground of
inadmissibility that can be waived, the alien would need to file
another waiver application with USCIS.
This process would not alter the requirement that an alien depart
from the United States to apply for an immigrant visa. An alien who
receives a provisional waiver under section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act
for the three- or ten-year bar under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II)
of the Act would not gain the benefit of such waiver unless he or she
departs from the United States. The departure from the United States
would have to take place to activate the provisional waiver under
section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act.
E. Excluded Visa Categories
Aliens who would not be eligible for this provisional waiver
adjudication process and aliens who are denied provisional approval of
their waiver requests would continue to follow current agency processes
for filing and adjudication of waiver requests. Aliens who fall under
any other family- or employment-based or other visa category or whose
section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) waiver eligibility would be based on extreme
hardship to a lawful permanent resident alien relative would not be
considered for provisional waivers. Aliens who are subject to other
grounds of inadmissibility or removal also would not be considered for
provisional waivers. Further, aliens with waiver applications under
section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act currently pending in either
administrative or judicial proceedings would not qualify for this new
process.
III. Conclusion
This document outlines the key elements of USCIS's proposed change
to its current process for filing and adjudication of waivers of
inadmissibility for unlawful presence for immediate relative of U.S.
citizens. The focus on family unification of U.S. citizens and their
immediate relatives is consistent with Congress's prioritization
[[Page 1043]]
in the immigration laws; the new process will reduce the movement of
the case back and forth between the Department of State and USCIS,
which significantly prolongs the overall process and increases the time
that U.S. citizens are separated from their immediate family members.
The proposed change would affect only when and where certain aliens can
apply for waivers of the unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility;
it would not change the extreme hardship standard for evaluating
eligibility for the waiver nor would it change whether aliens subject
to these grounds of inadmissibility must depart the U.S. to apply for
their immigrant visas. USCIS plans to effectuate this proposal through
the regulatory process. USCIS will issue a proposed rulemaking that
will explain the proposal in further detail and that will invite
comment from all interested parties. Note: Do not send an application
requesting a provisional waiver under the procedures under
consideration in this notice. Any application requesting this new
process will be rejected and the application package returned to the
applicant, including any fees, until a final rule is issued and the
change becomes effective.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2012-140 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P