Security Zones; Cruise Ships, San Pedro Bay, CA, 1025-1027 [2012-109]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
repeat that certification for this second
TIR, which will have a favorable though
insignificant impact on small entities by
allowing us to suspend enforcement of
provisions against them.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we continue to offer to assist small
entities in understanding the RNA and
its impact on them.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Miscellaneous
The amendment made by this second
TIR allows us to suspend enforcement
of the RNA’s requirements. As such, the
amendment has no further impact on
the analyses included in the first TIR of
collection of information (Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520); Federalism (Executive Order
13132), the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538), the
taking of private property (Executive
Order 12630), civil justice reform
(Executive Order 12988), protection of
children (Executive Order 13045),
Indian tribal governments (Executive
Order 13175), energy (Executive Order
13211), technical standards (the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act, 15 U.S.C. 272 note),
or the environment. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D. This rule
involves the establishment of a RNA. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In 33 CFR 165.T01–0727, add
paragraph (b)(9) to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0727 Regulated Navigation
Area; Arthur Kill, NY and NJ.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(9) Suspension of enforcement: the
Captain of the Port (COTP) New York
will cause notice of enforcement,
suspension of enforcement, or closure of
the waterway to be made by all
appropriate means to achieve the widest
distribution among the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification may include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
Local Notice to Mariners and Vessel
Traffic Service New York (VTSNY).
Such notification will include the date
and time that enforcement is suspended
as well as the date and time that
enforcement will resume.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 16, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–108 Filed 1–6–12; 8:45 am]
1025
located within the San Pedro Bay port
area landward of the sea buoys
bounding the Port of Los Angeles or Port
of Long Beach or at designated
anchorages within 3 nautical miles of
the Federal breakwater. This rule is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
cruise ship, vessels, and users of the
waterway. Entry into these security
zones will be prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP) Los Angeles—Long
Beach, or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective February 8,
2012.
ADDRESSES: The contents of the online
docket for this rulemaking, USCG–
2011–0101, may be viewed by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0101 in the ‘‘Keyword box,
and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ensign Stephen M. Sanders,
Assistant Chief, Waterways
Management, Coast Guard Sector Los
Angeles—Long Beach, Coast Guard;
telephone (310) 521–3860, email
Stephen.M.Sanders@uscg.mil. If you
have any questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
(202) 366–9826.
Regulatory Information
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0101]
On August 16, 2011, we published a
noticed of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Security Zones; Cruise Ships,
San Pedro Bay, CA in the Federal
Register (76 FR 50710). We received no
comments on the proposed rule, either
through the electronic docket office, or
directly to Coast Guard Sector Los
Angeles—Long Beach. A public meeting
was not requested, and none were held.
RIN 1625–AA87
Basis and Purpose
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
Security Zones; Cruise Ships, San
Pedro Bay, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is amending
a security zone regulation for cruise
ships visiting San Pedro Bay, California
by providing a common description of
all security zones to encompass only
navigable waters within a 100-yard
radius around any cruise ship that is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Based on experience with actual
security zone enforcement operations,
the COTP Los Angeles—Long Beach has
concluded that a security zone is
needed encompassing all navigable
waters, extending from the surface to
the sea floor, within a 100 yard radius
around any cruise ship that is within
the San Pedro Bay port area inside the
sea buoys bounding the Port of Los
Angeles or Port of Long Beach or at
designated anchorages within 3 nautical
miles of the Federal breakwater. This
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
1026
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
will provide for the safety of the cruise
ship, vessels, and users of the waterway.
Background
The Coast Guard is amending an
existing security zone regulation. The
security zones created by this rule will
encompass only navigable waters within
a 100-yard radius around any cruise
ship that is located within the San
Pedro Bay port area landward of the sea
buoys bounding the Port of Los Angeles
or Port of Long Beach or at designated
anchorages within 3 nautical miles of
the Federal breakwater. These security
zones are necessary to provide for the
safety of the cruise ship, vessels, and
users of the waterway. Entry into these
security zones is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP) Los Angeles—Long
Beach, or his designated representative.
Paragraph (b)(1) and (b)(2) of the
existing 33 CFR 165.1154 includes
reference to the shore area and cruise
ships anchored at designated
anchorages either inside or outside at
designated anchorages within 3 nautical
miles of the Federal breakwaters. The
COTP has determined that security
zones for moored cruise ships in Los
Angeles—Long Beach Harbors need not
include any shore area, as passenger
terminals used for cruise ship
operations are regulated under
regulations in 33 CFR part 105 issued
under authority of the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002
(Pub. L. 107–295). In addition to
clarifying the area covered by security
zones created by § 165.1154(b), this rule
simplifies the regulation by not
distinguishing between anchored cruise
ships, moored cruise ships, and cruise
ships underway. Also, § 165.1154
paragraph (c) is amended to make it
clear that persons and vessels may not
enter these security zones without first
obtaining permission of the Captain of
the Port.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments submitted to
the electronic docket or to the Coast
Guard Sector Los Angeles—Long Beach.
No changes were made from the
proposed regulation.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order or under Executive Order 13563,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We expect the economic impact
of this rule to be so minimal that full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
Most of the entities likely to be affected
are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing.
In addition, due to National Security
interests, the implementation of this
security zone regulation is necessary for
the protection of the United States and
its people. The size of the zones is the
minimum necessary to provide adequate
protection for cruise ships.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
Los Angeles—Long Beach ports within
a 100-yard radius of cruise ships
covered by this rule.
This security zone regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because vessel traffic can pass safely
around the zones.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g. specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
1027
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34) (g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves amending a security zone
regulation by removing the reference to
shore area in security zones for moored
cruise ships. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket were indicated under
ADDRESSES.
moored, or anchored, the stationary
vessel must stay moored or anchored
while it remains within the cruise ship’s
security zone unless it is either ordered
by, or given permission from, the COTP
Los Angeles-Long Beach to do
otherwise.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 165.1154, revise paragraphs (b)
and (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 165.1154 Security Zones; Moored Cruise
Ships, San Pedro Bay, California.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Location. The following areas are
security zones: All navigable waters,
extending from the surface to the sea
floor, within a 100-yard radius around
any cruise ship that is located within
the San Pedro Bay area landward of the
sea buoys bounding the port of Los
Angeles or Port of Long Beach or
designated anchorages within 3 nautical
miles seaward of the Federal
Breakwaters.
(c) Regulations. Under regulations in
33 CFR part 165, subpart D, a person or
vessel may not entry into or remain in
the security zones created by this
section unless authorized by the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port, Los
Angeles—Long Beach (COTP) or a COTP
designated representative.
(1) Persons desiring to transit these
security zones may contact the COTP at
telephone number (310) 521–3801 or on
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) to
seek permission to transit the area. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port or
his or her designated representative.
(2) When a cruise ship approaches
within 100 yards of a vessel that is
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: December 23, 2011.
R.R. Laferriere,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Los Angeles—Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2012–109 Filed 1–6–12; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2007–1037; FRL–9506–8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; State of
Colorado; Interstate Transport of
Pollution Revisions for the 1997 PM2.5
and 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS:
‘‘Significant Contribution,’’
‘‘Interference With Maintenance,’’ and
‘‘Interference With Prevention of
Significant Deterioration’’
Requirements; Revisions to Regulation
No. 3
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving portions of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Colorado for the purpose of addressing
the ‘‘good neighbor’’ provisions of Clean
Air Act (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘CAA’’) section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(‘‘NAAQS’’ or ‘‘standards’’) and the
1997 fine particulate matter (‘‘PM2.5’’)
NAAQS. This SIP revision addresses the
requirement that the State of Colorado’s
SIP (‘‘Interstate Transport SIP’’) have
adequate provisions to prohibit air
emissions from adversely affecting
another state’s air quality through
interstate transport. In this action, EPA
is approving the Colorado Interstate
Transport SIP provisions that address
the requirement of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) that emissions from
Colorado sources do not significantly
contribute to nonattainment of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state,
interfere with maintenance of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS by any other state, or
interfere with any other state’s required
measures to prevent significant
deterioration of air quality for the 1997
PM2.5 and 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1025-1027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-109]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0101]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zones; Cruise Ships, San Pedro Bay, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending a security zone regulation for
cruise ships visiting San Pedro Bay, California by providing a common
description of all security zones to encompass only navigable waters
within a 100-yard radius around any cruise ship that is located within
the San Pedro Bay port area landward of the sea buoys bounding the Port
of Los Angeles or Port of Long Beach or at designated anchorages within
3 nautical miles of the Federal breakwater. This rule is necessary to
provide for the safety of the cruise ship, vessels, and users of the
waterway. Entry into these security zones will be prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Los Angeles--
Long Beach, or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective February 8, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The contents of the online docket for this rulemaking, USCG-
2011-0101, may be viewed by going to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2011-0101 in the ``Keyword box, and then clicking
``Search.'' This material is also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ensign Stephen M. Sanders, Assistant Chief, Waterways
Management, Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach, Coast Guard;
telephone (310) 521-3860, email Stephen.M.Sanders@uscg.mil. If you have
any questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
Regulatory Information
On August 16, 2011, we published a noticed of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Security Zones; Cruise Ships, San Pedro Bay, CA in the
Federal Register (76 FR 50710). We received no comments on the proposed
rule, either through the electronic docket office, or directly to Coast
Guard Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach. A public meeting was not
requested, and none were held.
Basis and Purpose
Based on experience with actual security zone enforcement
operations, the COTP Los Angeles--Long Beach has concluded that a
security zone is needed encompassing all navigable waters, extending
from the surface to the sea floor, within a 100 yard radius around any
cruise ship that is within the San Pedro Bay port area inside the sea
buoys bounding the Port of Los Angeles or Port of Long Beach or at
designated anchorages within 3 nautical miles of the Federal
breakwater. This
[[Page 1026]]
will provide for the safety of the cruise ship, vessels, and users of
the waterway.
Background
The Coast Guard is amending an existing security zone regulation.
The security zones created by this rule will encompass only navigable
waters within a 100-yard radius around any cruise ship that is located
within the San Pedro Bay port area landward of the sea buoys bounding
the Port of Los Angeles or Port of Long Beach or at designated
anchorages within 3 nautical miles of the Federal breakwater. These
security zones are necessary to provide for the safety of the cruise
ship, vessels, and users of the waterway. Entry into these security
zones is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP) Los Angeles--Long Beach, or his designated
representative.
Paragraph (b)(1) and (b)(2) of the existing 33 CFR 165.1154
includes reference to the shore area and cruise ships anchored at
designated anchorages either inside or outside at designated anchorages
within 3 nautical miles of the Federal breakwaters. The COTP has
determined that security zones for moored cruise ships in Los Angeles--
Long Beach Harbors need not include any shore area, as passenger
terminals used for cruise ship operations are regulated under
regulations in 33 CFR part 105 issued under authority of the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-295). In addition to
clarifying the area covered by security zones created by Sec.
165.1154(b), this rule simplifies the regulation by not distinguishing
between anchored cruise ships, moored cruise ships, and cruise ships
underway. Also, Sec. 165.1154 paragraph (c) is amended to make it
clear that persons and vessels may not enter these security zones
without first obtaining permission of the Captain of the Port.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments submitted to the electronic docket or to the
Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach. No changes were made from
the proposed regulation.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order or under Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under
the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Most of the
entities likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing. In addition, due to National
Security interests, the implementation of this security zone regulation
is necessary for the protection of the United States and its people.
The size of the zones is the minimum necessary to provide adequate
protection for cruise ships.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in Los Angeles--Long Beach ports within a 100-yard radius of
cruise ships covered by this rule.
This security zone regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because vessel traffic
can pass safely around the zones.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to
[[Page 1027]]
health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g. specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34) (g), of the Instruction. This rule involves amending a
security zone regulation by removing the reference to shore area in
security zones for moored cruise ships. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket were indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 165.1154, revise paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1154 Security Zones; Moored Cruise Ships, San Pedro Bay,
California.
* * * * *
(b) Location. The following areas are security zones: All navigable
waters, extending from the surface to the sea floor, within a 100-yard
radius around any cruise ship that is located within the San Pedro Bay
area landward of the sea buoys bounding the port of Los Angeles or Port
of Long Beach or designated anchorages within 3 nautical miles seaward
of the Federal Breakwaters.
(c) Regulations. Under regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, a
person or vessel may not entry into or remain in the security zones
created by this section unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of
the Port, Los Angeles--Long Beach (COTP) or a COTP designated
representative.
(1) Persons desiring to transit these security zones may contact
the COTP at telephone number (310) 521-3801 or on VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz) to seek permission to transit the area. If permission is
granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
(2) When a cruise ship approaches within 100 yards of a vessel that
is moored, or anchored, the stationary vessel must stay moored or
anchored while it remains within the cruise ship's security zone unless
it is either ordered by, or given permission from, the COTP Los
Angeles-Long Beach to do otherwise.
* * * * *
Dated: December 23, 2011.
R.R. Laferriere,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Los Angeles--Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2012-109 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P