Regulated Navigation Area; S99 Alford Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project, Mystic River, MA, 1020-1023 [2012-104]
Download as PDF
1020
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(c) After receiving the acquisition fee,
BOEM will follow the process outlined
in § 585.231(d) through (i).
[FR Doc. 2012–50 Filed 1–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1125]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; S99 Alford
Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project,
Mystic River, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The United States Coast
Guard is establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable
waters of the Mystic River under and
surrounding the S99 Alford Street
Bridge which crosses the Mystic River
between Boston and Chelsea,
Massachusetts. This temporary interim
rule is intended to protect both vessels
and construction workers by restricting
vessel traffic during periods where the
bridge is being repaired.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on January 9, 2012 through November
30, 2012. This rule is effective with
actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from December 27, 2011
until 11:59 p.m. on November 30, 2012.
Public comments will be accepted and
reviewed by the Coast Guard through
November 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–1125 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Documents indicated in this preamble
as being available in the docket are part
of docket USCG–2011–1125 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2011–1125 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They are also
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Mr. Mark Cutter,
Coast Guard Sector Boston Waterways
Management Division, telephone (617)
223–4000, email
Mark.E.Cutter@uscg.mil; or Lieutenant
Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt, Coast Guard
First District Waterways Management
Branch, telephone (617) 223–8385,
email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
As this temporary interim rule will be
in effect before the end of the comment
period, the Coast Guard will evaluate
and revise this rule as necessary to
address significant public comments.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–1125),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1125’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
this rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
1125’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting within the meaning of the
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe such a
public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard has held or
participated in one informal waterway
user meeting where waterway closures
and restrictions were discussed. We
anticipate holding additional informal
meetings, with opportunity for public
questions or comments, during this
project. We will provide written
summaries of any such meetings in the
docket.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
interim rule without prior Federal
Register notice pursuant to authority
under section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)).
This provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice when
the agency for good cause finds that
those procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because the Coast Guard was not
provided enough notice by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts to
allow for a notice and comment period.
A full waterway closure was not
requested of the Coast Guard until
November 23, 2011, when the
Massachusetts Department of
Transportation (MA DOT) requested a
complete waterway closure beginning
December 12, 2011 until May 31, 2012.
MA DOT’s request for full waterway
closure was not timely according to the
existing Coast Guard requirements, and
the late submission did not give the
Coast Guard enough time to publish an
NPRM in order to solicit comments
concerning a waterway closure before
implementing this interim rule.
It is still in the public interest to
promulgate this rule, as it is necessary
to protect the safety of both the
construction crew and the waterway
users operating in the vicinity of the
bridge construction zone. A delay or
cancellation of the currently ongoing
bridge rehabilitation project in order to
accommodate a full notice and comment
period would be contrary to the public
interest as it would delay necessary
operations, result in increased costs,
and delay the date when the bridge is
expected to reopen for normal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
operations. The Coast Guard believes it
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest to delay this
regulation. At any time, the Coast Guard
may publish an amended rule if
necessary to address public concerns.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of this interim rule is to
ensure the safe transit of vessels in the
area and to protect all persons, vessels,
and the marine environment during the
rehabilitation project of the S99 Alford
Street Bridge.
1021
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal because the
amount of traffic in this waterway is
extremely limited. Furthermore, the
Captain of the Port has the ability to
suspend the provisions of this
regulation when necessary.
Regulatory Analyses
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
marinas, businesses (such as waterside
restaurants), and vessels who intend to
transit in the Mystic River beneath the
S99 Alford Street Bridge during the
effective period.
This regulation may have some
impact on the public, but the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: The primary
waterway users, of which there are very
few, are recreational vessels of various
sizes and do not normally operate
during the months between December
and April. Many parties that have the
potential to be affected have been
involved in the discussions and have
made plans to work around the closure
times. We will use appropriate means to
inform the public before, during, and at
the conclusion of any RNA enforcement
period.
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
Discussion of Rule
This action is intended to control
vessel traffic for the duration of the S99
Alford Street Bridge rehabilitation over
the main channel of the Mystic River.
The Coast Guard may close the
regulated area described in this rule to
all vessel traffic during any
circumstance that poses an imminent
threat to waterway users operating in
the area. Complete waterway closures
will be made with as much advance
notice as possible.
The COTP Sector Boston will cause
notice of enforcement, suspension of
enforcement, or closure of the waterway
to be made by all appropriate means to
ensure the widest distribution among
the affected segments of the public.
Such means of notification may include,
but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners,
and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins.
Entry into this RNA is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP Sector
Boston. Any violation of this RNA is
punishable by civil and criminal
penalties, in rem liability against the
offending vessel, and the initiation of
suspension or revocation proceedings
against Coast Guard-issued merchantmariner credentials.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
1022
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of an RNA.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Any comments received
concerning environmental impacts will
be considered and changes made to the
environmental analysis checklist and
categorical exclusion determination as
appropriate.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–1125 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–1125 Regulated Navigation
Area; S99 Alford Street Bridge rehabilitation
project, Mystic River, MA
(a) Location. The following area is a
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA): All
navigable waters of the Mystic River
between Boston and Chelsea, MA, from
surface to bottom, within 100 yards of
any point on the S99 Alford Street
Bridge.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and 165.13
apply in addition to those provisions
outlined below.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations, entry into or movement
within this zone, during periods of
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
enforcement, is prohibited unless
authorized by Captain of the Port
(COTP) Sector Boston.
(3) All persons and vessels must
comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP Sector Boston or the
on-scene representative. The ‘‘on-scene
representative’’ of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the COTP to act on the COTP’s
behalf. The on-scene representative may
be on a Coast Guard vessel or other
designated craft, or may be on shore and
will communicate with vessels via
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. Members
of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation.
(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of the
vessel must proceed as directed.
(5) Notwithstanding any other
provisions in this regulation, the
movement of official, emergency vessels
within the regulated area is permitted
provided that the contractor is notified
in order to remove potential hazards or
obstructions.
(6) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road (33 CFR subchapter E, Inland
Navigational Rules) remain in effect
within the regulated area and must be
strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period:
(1) This regulated navigation area is
enforceable 24 hours a day from
December 27, 2011 through November
30, 2012.
(2) Suspension of enforcement: The
COTP Sector Boston will cause notice of
enforcement, suspension of
enforcement, or closure of the waterway
to be made by all appropriate means to
achieve the widest distribution among
the affected segments of the public.
Such means of notification may include
but are not limited to Broadcast Notice
to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners
and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins. Such notification will include
the date and time that enforcement is
suspended as well as the date and time
that enforcement will resume.
(3) Report violations of this regulated
navigation area to the COTP Sector
Boston, at (617) 223–5757 or on VHF–
Channel 16.
Dated: December 27, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–104 Filed 1–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jan 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0727]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Arthur Kill,
NY and NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is amending
the Regulated Navigation Area (RNA) in
the navigable waters of the Arthur Kill
in New York and New Jersey. The
amendment allows the Coast Guard to
suspend enforcement of some RNA
requirements when they are found to be
impracticable and unnecessary for the
maintenance of safety.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on January 9, 2012 until 5 p.m. on April
1, 2014. This rule is effective with
actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from December 16, 2011,
until 5 p.m. on April 1, 2014. Public
comments will be accepted and
reviewed by the Coast Guard through
April 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2011–0727 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2011–0727 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Jeff Yunker, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector New York Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (718) 354–4195, email
Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil, or Lieutenant
Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt, Coast Guard
First District Waterways Management
Branch, telephone (617) 223–8385,
email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1023
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
The Coast Guard will evaluate and
revise this rule as necessary to address
significant public comments.
Alternatively, if the dredging project
necessitating the interim rule is
completed before April 1, 2014, and we
receive no public comments that
indicate a substantive need to revise the
rule, we may allow it to expire on that
date without further regulatory action.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0727),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0727’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1020-1023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-104]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1125]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; S99 Alford Street Bridge
Rehabilitation Project, Mystic River, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard is establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable waters of the Mystic River under
and surrounding the S99 Alford Street Bridge which crosses the Mystic
River between Boston and Chelsea, Massachusetts. This temporary interim
rule is intended to protect both vessels and construction workers by
restricting vessel traffic during periods where the bridge is being
repaired.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR on January 9, 2012 through
November 30, 2012. This rule is effective with actual notice for
purposes of enforcement from December 27, 2011 until 11:59 p.m. on
November 30, 2012. Public comments will be accepted and reviewed by the
Coast Guard through November 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-1125 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1125 and are available online by
going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1125 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Mark Cutter, Coast Guard Sector
Boston Waterways Management Division, telephone (617) 223-4000, email
Mark.E.Cutter@uscg.mil; or Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt, Coast
Guard First District Waterways Management Branch, telephone (617) 223-
8385, email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
As this temporary interim rule will be in effect before the end of
the comment period, the Coast Guard will evaluate and revise this rule
as necessary to address significant public comments.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-1125), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-1125'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change this rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-1125'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting within the meaning of
the
[[Page 1021]]
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe such a public meeting would
be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
The Coast Guard has held or participated in one informal waterway
user meeting where waterway closures and restrictions were discussed.
We anticipate holding additional informal meetings, with opportunity
for public questions or comments, during this project. We will provide
written summaries of any such meetings in the docket.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this interim rule without prior Federal
Register notice pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because the Coast Guard was not provided enough notice by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts to allow for a notice and comment period.
A full waterway closure was not requested of the Coast Guard until
November 23, 2011, when the Massachusetts Department of Transportation
(MA DOT) requested a complete waterway closure beginning December 12,
2011 until May 31, 2012. MA DOT's request for full waterway closure was
not timely according to the existing Coast Guard requirements, and the
late submission did not give the Coast Guard enough time to publish an
NPRM in order to solicit comments concerning a waterway closure before
implementing this interim rule.
It is still in the public interest to promulgate this rule, as it
is necessary to protect the safety of both the construction crew and
the waterway users operating in the vicinity of the bridge construction
zone. A delay or cancellation of the currently ongoing bridge
rehabilitation project in order to accommodate a full notice and
comment period would be contrary to the public interest as it would
delay necessary operations, result in increased costs, and delay the
date when the bridge is expected to reopen for normal operations. The
Coast Guard believes it would be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest to delay this regulation. At any time, the Coast Guard
may publish an amended rule if necessary to address public concerns.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this interim rule is to ensure the safe transit of
vessels in the area and to protect all persons, vessels, and the marine
environment during the rehabilitation project of the S99 Alford Street
Bridge.
Discussion of Rule
This action is intended to control vessel traffic for the duration
of the S99 Alford Street Bridge rehabilitation over the main channel of
the Mystic River. The Coast Guard may close the regulated area
described in this rule to all vessel traffic during any circumstance
that poses an imminent threat to waterway users operating in the area.
Complete waterway closures will be made with as much advance notice as
possible.
The COTP Sector Boston will cause notice of enforcement, suspension
of enforcement, or closure of the waterway to be made by all
appropriate means to ensure the widest distribution among the affected
segments of the public. Such means of notification may include, but are
not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners,
and Marine Safety Information Bulletins.
Entry into this RNA is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP
Sector Boston. Any violation of this RNA is punishable by civil and
criminal penalties, in rem liability against the offending vessel, and
the initiation of suspension or revocation proceedings against Coast
Guard-issued merchant-mariner credentials.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
the amount of traffic in this waterway is extremely limited.
Furthermore, the Captain of the Port has the ability to suspend the
provisions of this regulation when necessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of marinas, businesses
(such as waterside restaurants), and vessels who intend to transit in
the Mystic River beneath the S99 Alford Street Bridge during the
effective period.
This regulation may have some impact on the public, but the
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: The
primary waterway users, of which there are very few, are recreational
vessels of various sizes and do not normally operate during the months
between December and April. Many parties that have the potential to be
affected have been involved in the discussions and have made plans to
work around the closure times. We will use appropriate means to inform
the public before, during, and at the conclusion of any RNA enforcement
period.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121),
[[Page 1022]]
we offer to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of an
RNA. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Any comments received concerning environmental impacts will
be considered and changes made to the environmental analysis checklist
and categorical exclusion determination as appropriate.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-1125 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-1125 Regulated Navigation Area; S99 Alford Street Bridge
rehabilitation project, Mystic River, MA
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters of the Mystic River between Boston and
Chelsea, MA, from surface to bottom, within 100 yards of any point on
the S99 Alford Street Bridge.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and
165.13 apply in addition to those provisions outlined below.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations, entry into or
movement within this zone, during periods of
[[Page 1023]]
enforcement, is prohibited unless authorized by Captain of the Port
(COTP) Sector Boston.
(3) All persons and vessels must comply with all directions given
to them by the COTP Sector Boston or the on-scene representative. The
``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been designated by the
COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene representative may be on
a Coast Guard vessel or other designated craft, or may be on shore and
will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. Members
of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators
of this regulation.
(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel must proceed
as directed.
(5) Notwithstanding any other provisions in this regulation, the
movement of official, emergency vessels within the regulated area is
permitted provided that the contractor is notified in order to remove
potential hazards or obstructions.
(6) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR subchapter E, Inland Navigational Rules)
remain in effect within the regulated area and must be strictly
followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period:
(1) This regulated navigation area is enforceable 24 hours a day
from December 27, 2011 through November 30, 2012.
(2) Suspension of enforcement: The COTP Sector Boston will cause
notice of enforcement, suspension of enforcement, or closure of the
waterway to be made by all appropriate means to achieve the widest
distribution among the affected segments of the public. Such means of
notification may include but are not limited to Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins. Such notification will include the date and time that
enforcement is suspended as well as the date and time that enforcement
will resume.
(3) Report violations of this regulated navigation area to the COTP
Sector Boston, at (617) 223-5757 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: December 27, 2011.
D.A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012-104 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P