Clarification and Further Guidance on the Fireworks Approvals Policy, 429-431 [2011-33853]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this rule will
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income
populations because it does not affect
the level of protection provided to
human health or the environment. This
rulemaking does not involve human
health or environmental affects.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, does not apply
because this action is not a rule, for
purposes of 5 U.S.C. 804(3).
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, EPA is
not considering the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1552
Environmental protection,
Government procurement.
Dated: November 18, 2011.
John R. Bashista,
Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
Therefore, 48 CFR Chapter 1552 is
amended as set forth below:
PART 1552—DESCRIBING AGENCY
NEEDS
1. The authority citation for part 1552
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63
Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c); and
41 U.S.C. 418b.
2. Revise 1552.211–79 to read as
follows:
■
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1552.211–79 Compliance With EPA
Policies for Information Resources
Management.
As prescribed in 1511.011–79, insert
the following clause:
Compliance with EPA Policies for
Information Resources Management
(a) Definition. Information Resources
Management (IRM) is defined as any
planning, budgeting, organizing,
directing, training, promoting,
controlling, and managing activities
associated with the burden, collection,
creation, use and dissemination of
information. IRM includes both
information itself and the management
of information and related resources
such as personnel, equipment, funds,
and technology. Examples of these
services include but are not limited to
the following:
(1) The acquisition, creation, or
modification of a computer program or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jan 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
automated data base for delivery to EPA
or use by EPA or contractors operating
EPA programs.
(2) The analysis of requirements for,
study of the feasibility of, evaluation of
alternatives for, or design and
development of a computer program or
automated data base for use by EPA or
contractors operating EPA programs.
(3) Services that provide EPA
personnel access to or use of computer
or word processing equipment,
software, or related services.
(4) Services that provide EPA
personnel access to or use of: Data
communications; electronic messaging
services or capabilities; electronic
bulletin boards, or other forms of
electronic information dissemination;
electronic record-keeping; or any other
automated information services.
(b) General. The Contractor shall
perform any IRM-related work under
this contract in accordance with the
IRM policies, standards, and procedures
set forth on the Office of Environmental
Information policy Web site. Upon
receipt of a work request (i.e. delivery
order, task order, or work assignment),
the Contractor shall check this listing of
directives. The applicable directives for
performance of the work request are
those in effect on the date of issuance
of the work request. The 2100 Series
(2100–2199) of the Agency’s Directive
System contains the majority of the
Agency’s IRM policies, standards, and
procedures.
(c) Section 508 requirements. Contract
deliverables are required to be
compliant with Section 508
requirements. The Environmental
Protection Agency policy for 508
compliance can be found on the
Agency’s Directive System identified in
section (d) of this clause under policy
number CIO 2130.0, Accessible
Electronic and Information Technology.
Additional information on Section 508
including EPA’s 508 policy can be
found at www.epa.gov/accessibility.
(d) Electronic access. A complete
listing, including full text, of documents
included in the 2100 Series of the
Agency’s Directive System is
maintained on the EPA Public Access
Server on the Internet at https://epa.gov/
docs/irmpoli8/.
[FR Doc. 2011–33844 Filed 1–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
429
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 173
[Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0315; Notice No.
11–13]
Clarification and Further Guidance on
the Fireworks Approvals Policy
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Clarification.
AGENCY:
This clarification provides
further guidance on PHMSA’s policy
that it will only accept fireworks
approvals applications from fireworks
manufacturers or their designated agents
and grant approvals only to
manufacturers of fireworks devices.
This clarification and additional
guidance follows the issuance of Docket
No. PHMSA–2010–0353; Notice 10–9,
published on June 29, 2011.
DATES: The policy clarification
discussed in this document is effective
January 5, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ryan Paquet, Director, Approvals and
Permits Division, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, (202) 366–4512,
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Introduction
This document provides clarification
and further guidance on PHMSA’s
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety
(OHMS), Clarification of the Fireworks
Approval Policy published on June 29,
2011 (76 FR 38053). Specifically, this
document provides clarification and
additional guidance on how we intend
to implement our policy with respect to:
(1) EX classification approvals with
expiration dates; (2) applications from
non-manufacturers that seek to add new
item names to existing EX classification
approvals; and (3) applications from
non-manufacturers that were denied
prior to June 29, 2011.
In addition to addressing questions as
to how we intend to implement our
earlier policy clarification, this
document clarifies our policy regarding
the transfer of EX classification
approvals.
II. Background
The transportation of an explosive
(fireworks device) requires an EX
classification approval issued by
PHMSA, commonly referred to as an EX
number. The EX number is a unique
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
430
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
identifier that indicates the device has
been classed and approved for
transportation in the U.S., and is
specific to a particular device as
specified in 49 CFR 173.56(j) and the
American Pyrotechnic Association
(APA) Standard 87–1.
PHMSA understands that it is a
common industry practice for fireworks
devices produced by one manufacturer
to be marketed and sold under different
trade names. Further, in the past, each
retailer, importer or distributor, in
addition to the manufacturer, applied
for and received an EX classification
approval for the identical fireworks
device. This practice resulted in
PHMSA processing multiple
applications and issuing multiple
approvals for the same fireworks device.
This redundant and burdensome
process did not promote the safe
transportation of explosives (fireworks
devices); instead, it impeded the
conduct of business for both the
fireworks industry and PHMSA.
On June 29, 2011, we issued a
clarification of our policy to issue
fireworks classification approvals only
to fireworks manufacturers, and accept
fireworks classification applications
only from fireworks manufacturers or
their U.S. designated agents. This policy
clarification was intended to restate the
requirements of the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR), enhance safety by
ensuring accountability of
manufacturing, and reducing the
number of duplicate applications and
EX classification approvals being issued
for identical fireworks devices.
Since the policy clarification was
issued, we have received questions
about how we intend to implement it
with respect to: (1) EX classification
approvals with expiration dates; (2)
applications from non-manufacturers
that seek to add new item names to
existing EX classification approvals; and
(3) applications from non-manufacturers
that were denied prior to June 29, 2011.
We have also received questions
about our policy regarding the transfer
of EX classification approvals, which
was not addressed in the prior
clarification notice.
To address these questions regarding
our fireworks approvals policy, we are
providing the following clarification
and additional guidance.
classification approval, the
manufacturer or its designated agent
must be the entity who submits an
application for renewal and all
supporting documentation to
fireworks@dot.gov. The manufacturer
must sign and certify that the device for
which the approval is requested
conforms to the APA Standard 87–1,
and the descriptions and technical
information contained in the
application are complete and accurate
in accordance with § 173.56(j)(3).
All EX approvals with expiration
dates held by non-manufacturers will
expire as follows: Fireworks EX
approvals expiring January 1, 2012
through December 31, 2012 will expire
two years from the date indicated in the
approval. For example, a fireworks EX
approval expiring on January 1, 2012
will be extended until January 1, 2014.
A revised EX classification approval
will be automatically sent to the
approval holder on record with the new
expiration date. After December 31,
2014, the manufacturer or its designated
agent must submit the application for
renewal and all supporting
documentation to fireworks@dot.gov.
The manufacturer must sign and certify
that the device for which the approval
is requested conforms to the APA
Standard 87–1, and the descriptions and
technical information contained in the
application are complete and accurate
in accordance with § 173.56(j)(3).
Fireworks EX classification approvals
expiring January 1, 2013 through
December 31, 2015 will expire on the
date noted in the EX approval and will
not be extended. The manufacturer or
its designated agent must submit an
application for renewal and all
supporting documentation to
fireworks@dot.gov. The manufacturer
must sign and certify that the device for
which the approval is requested
conforms to the APA Standard 87–1,
and the descriptions and technical
information contained in the
application are complete and accurate
in accordance with § 173.56(j)(3). For
example, a fireworks EX Approval
expiring on March 22, 2014 will expire
on March 22, 2014.
All fireworks EX approvals with
expiration dates will expire by the end
of 2015.
III. EX Classification Approvals With
Expiration Dates
After June 29, 2011, only a
manufacturer that holds a valid EX
classification approval may reapply to
have the EX number renewed.
Regardless of who originally applied for
the approval, to renew the EX
IV. Requests To Add Additional Item
Names to Existing EX Classification
Approvals
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jan 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
We often receive applications to add
fireworks device item names to an
existing EX classification approval.
Only a manufacturer or its designated
agent may submit a request after June
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29, 2011 to add an additional item name
to an existing EX approval.
If anyone other than the manufacturer
or its designated agent holds an existing
EX classification approval and it is
desired to add additional items to that
approval, then the manufacturer or its
designated agent must submit the EX
classification approval as a new
application.
V. Firework Applications Denied
Before June 29, 2011
Firework applications resubmitted
after June 29, 2011 by any person,
company or entity other than the
manufacturer or its designated agent
that were previously denied will not be
accepted unless those applications are
submitted by the manufacturer or its
designated agent as the applicant. The
manufacturer must sign and certify that
the device for which the approval is
requested conforms to the APA
Standard 87–1, and the descriptions and
technical information contained in the
application are complete and accurate
in accordance with § 173.56(j)(3).
VI. Non-Transferability of EX
Approvals
EX approvals are non-transferrable,
and therefore, may not be sold or
transferred. Accordingly, EX approvals
cannot be acquired in connection with
any sale of assets, sale of business,
acquisition or merger. PHMSA may find
a company in violation of the HMR
should a manufacturer attempt to use an
EX approval issued by PHMSA to
another company for manufacturing of
the device. The manufacturer or its
designated agent must submit an
application for a new approval. The
manufacturer must sign and certify that
the device for which the approval is
requested conforms to the APA
Standard 87–1, and the descriptions and
technical information contained in the
application are complete and accurate
in accordance with § 173.56(j)(3). If
approved, PHMSA will issue a new EX
approval to the manufacturer specified
in the application.
Summary
PHMSA’s Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety (OHMS), Approvals
Office will continue to issue approvals
only to fireworks manufacturers and
accept applications only from
manufacturers or their designated
agents. Consistent with this policy, we
will only reissue EX classification
approvals with expiration dates that
have been submitted by the
manufacturer or its designated agent. If
the manufacturer was not the original
applicant, the manufacturer or its
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
designated agent must submit the
application as a new application.
However, we will provide an extended
expiration date of two years for EX
classification approvals that expire
through December 31, 2012.
Additionally, we will only accept
applications that seek to add new item
names to existing EX classification
approvals from the manufacturer or its
designated agent. If the manufacturer
was not the original applicant, the
application must be submitted by the
manufacturer or its designated agent as
a new application. Further, applications
from non-manufacturers that were
denied prior to June 29, 2011 must be
resubmitted by the manufacturer.
Finally, EX approvals are nontransferable, and therefore may not be
sold or transferred.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
30, 2011.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–33853 Filed 1–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R9–IA–2010–0056;
FF09A30000 123 FXGO16710900000R4]
RIN 1018–AX29
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Removal of the Regulation
That Excludes U.S. Captive-Bred
Scimitar-Horned Oryx, Addax, and
Dama Gazelle From Certain
Prohibitions
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), are revising
the regulations that implement the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), by removing the
exclusion of U.S. captive-bred live
wildlife and sport-hunted trophies of
three endangered antelopes—scimitarhorned oryx, addax, and dama gazelle—
from the prohibition of certain
activities, such as take and export,
under the Act. This change to the
regulations is in response to a court
order that found that the rule for these
three species violated section 10(c) of
the Act. These three antelope species
remain listed as endangered under the
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jan 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
Act, and a person will need to qualify
for an exemption or obtain an
authorization under the current
statutory and regulatory requirements to
conduct any prohibited activities.
DATES: This rule becomes effective on
April 4, 2012. An extended effective
date is being provided to facilitate in
outreach to the affected communities.
Several major industry events are
occurring in the beginning of 2012
where Service attendance will provide
greater communication on the impacts
of this rule and will ensure greater
compliance by the affected
communities. In addition, an extended
effective date will allow the affected
community to either legally sell their
specimens, if they choose to divest
themselves of these species, or to apply
for authorization or permits to continue
carrying out previously approved
activities.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain information
about permits or other authorizations to
carry out otherwise prohibited activities
by contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Division of Management
Authority, Branch of Permits, 4401 N.
Fairfax Drive, Room 212, Arlington, VA
22203; telephone: (703) 358–2104 or
(toll free) (800) 358–2104; facsimile:
(703) 358–2281; email:
managementauthority@fws.gov; Web
site: https://www.fws.gov/international/
index.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert R. Gabel, Chief, Division of
Management Authority, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 212, Arlington, VA 22203;
telephone 703–358–2093; fax 703–358–
2280. If you use a telecommunications
devise for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 2, 2005 (70 FR 52319),
the Service determined that the
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah),
addax (Addax nasomaculatus), and
dama gazelle (Gazella dama) were
endangered throughout their ranges
under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The numbers of these species of
antelopes in the wild have declined
drastically in the deserts of North Africa
over the past 50 years. The causes of
decline are habitat loss (desertification,
permanent human settlement, and
competition with domestic livestock),
regional military activity, and
uncontrolled killing. With the exception
of reintroduced animals, no sightings of
the scimitar-horned oryx have been
reported since the late 1980s. Remnant
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
431
populations of the addax may still exist
in remote desert areas, but probably
fewer than 600 occur in the wild. Only
small numbers of dama gazelle are
estimated to occur in the species’
historical range, with recent estimates of
fewer than 700 in the wild. Captivebreeding programs operated by zoos and
private ranches have increased the
number of these antelopes, while
genetically managing their herds and
providing founder stock necessary for
reintroduction. The Sahelo-Saharan
Interest Group (SSIG) of the United
Nations Environment Program estimated
that there are 4,000–5,000 scimitarhorned oryx, 1,500 addax, and 750
dama gazelle in captivity worldwide,
many of which are held in the United
States. Based on a 2010 census of its
members, the Exotic Wildlife
Association (EWA) estimates there are
11,032 scimitar-horned oryx, 5,112
addax, and 894 dama gazelle on EWA
member ranches.
On September 2, 2005 (the same date
that we listed the three antelopes as
endangered), the Service also published
a new regulation (70 FR 52310) at 50
CFR 17.21(h) to govern certain activities
with U.S. captive-bred animals of these
three species. For live antelopes,
including embryos and gametes, and
sport-hunted trophies of these three
species, the regulation authorized
certain otherwise prohibited activities
where the purpose of the activity is
associated with the management of the
species in a manner that contributed to
increasing or sustaining captive
numbers or to potential reintroduction
to range countries. These activities
include take; export or re-import;
delivery, receipt, carrying, transport or
shipment in interstate or foreign
commerce in the course of a commercial
activity; and sale or offer for sale in
interstate or foreign commerce.
The promulgation of the regulation at
50 CFR 17.21(h) was challenged as
violating section 10 of the Act and the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) in the United States
District Court for the District of
Columbia (see Friends of Animals, et al.,
v. Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior
and Rebecca Ann Cary, et al., v. Rowan
Gould, Acting Director, Fish and
Wildlife Service, et al., 626 F. Supp. 2d
102 (D.D.C. 2009)). The Court found that
the rule for the three antelope species
violated section 10(c) of the Act by not
providing the public an opportunity to
comment on activities being carried out
with these three antelope species. On
June 22, 2009, the Court remanded the
rule to the Service for action consistent
with its opinion.
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 429-431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33853]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 173
[Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0315; Notice No. 11-13]
Clarification and Further Guidance on the Fireworks Approvals
Policy
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Clarification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This clarification provides further guidance on PHMSA's policy
that it will only accept fireworks approvals applications from
fireworks manufacturers or their designated agents and grant approvals
only to manufacturers of fireworks devices. This clarification and
additional guidance follows the issuance of Docket No. PHMSA-2010-0353;
Notice 10-9, published on June 29, 2011.
DATES: The policy clarification discussed in this document is effective
January 5, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ryan Paquet, Director, Approvals
and Permits Division, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, (202) 366-
4512, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
This document provides clarification and further guidance on
PHMSA's Office of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS), Clarification of
the Fireworks Approval Policy published on June 29, 2011 (76 FR 38053).
Specifically, this document provides clarification and additional
guidance on how we intend to implement our policy with respect to: (1)
EX classification approvals with expiration dates; (2) applications
from non-manufacturers that seek to add new item names to existing EX
classification approvals; and (3) applications from non-manufacturers
that were denied prior to June 29, 2011.
In addition to addressing questions as to how we intend to
implement our earlier policy clarification, this document clarifies our
policy regarding the transfer of EX classification approvals.
II. Background
The transportation of an explosive (fireworks device) requires an
EX classification approval issued by PHMSA, commonly referred to as an
EX number. The EX number is a unique
[[Page 430]]
identifier that indicates the device has been classed and approved for
transportation in the U.S., and is specific to a particular device as
specified in 49 CFR 173.56(j) and the American Pyrotechnic Association
(APA) Standard 87-1.
PHMSA understands that it is a common industry practice for
fireworks devices produced by one manufacturer to be marketed and sold
under different trade names. Further, in the past, each retailer,
importer or distributor, in addition to the manufacturer, applied for
and received an EX classification approval for the identical fireworks
device. This practice resulted in PHMSA processing multiple
applications and issuing multiple approvals for the same fireworks
device. This redundant and burdensome process did not promote the safe
transportation of explosives (fireworks devices); instead, it impeded
the conduct of business for both the fireworks industry and PHMSA.
On June 29, 2011, we issued a clarification of our policy to issue
fireworks classification approvals only to fireworks manufacturers, and
accept fireworks classification applications only from fireworks
manufacturers or their U.S. designated agents. This policy
clarification was intended to restate the requirements of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR), enhance safety by ensuring accountability
of manufacturing, and reducing the number of duplicate applications and
EX classification approvals being issued for identical fireworks
devices.
Since the policy clarification was issued, we have received
questions about how we intend to implement it with respect to: (1) EX
classification approvals with expiration dates; (2) applications from
non-manufacturers that seek to add new item names to existing EX
classification approvals; and (3) applications from non-manufacturers
that were denied prior to June 29, 2011.
We have also received questions about our policy regarding the
transfer of EX classification approvals, which was not addressed in the
prior clarification notice.
To address these questions regarding our fireworks approvals
policy, we are providing the following clarification and additional
guidance.
III. EX Classification Approvals With Expiration Dates
After June 29, 2011, only a manufacturer that holds a valid EX
classification approval may reapply to have the EX number renewed.
Regardless of who originally applied for the approval, to renew the EX
classification approval, the manufacturer or its designated agent must
be the entity who submits an application for renewal and all supporting
documentation to fireworks@dot.gov. The manufacturer must sign and
certify that the device for which the approval is requested conforms to
the APA Standard 87-1, and the descriptions and technical information
contained in the application are complete and accurate in accordance
with Sec. 173.56(j)(3).
All EX approvals with expiration dates held by non-manufacturers
will expire as follows: Fireworks EX approvals expiring January 1, 2012
through December 31, 2012 will expire two years from the date indicated
in the approval. For example, a fireworks EX approval expiring on
January 1, 2012 will be extended until January 1, 2014. A revised EX
classification approval will be automatically sent to the approval
holder on record with the new expiration date. After December 31, 2014,
the manufacturer or its designated agent must submit the application
for renewal and all supporting documentation to fireworks@dot.gov. The
manufacturer must sign and certify that the device for which the
approval is requested conforms to the APA Standard 87-1, and the
descriptions and technical information contained in the application are
complete and accurate in accordance with Sec. 173.56(j)(3).
Fireworks EX classification approvals expiring January 1, 2013
through December 31, 2015 will expire on the date noted in the EX
approval and will not be extended. The manufacturer or its designated
agent must submit an application for renewal and all supporting
documentation to fireworks@dot.gov. The manufacturer must sign and
certify that the device for which the approval is requested conforms to
the APA Standard 87-1, and the descriptions and technical information
contained in the application are complete and accurate in accordance
with Sec. 173.56(j)(3). For example, a fireworks EX Approval expiring
on March 22, 2014 will expire on March 22, 2014.
All fireworks EX approvals with expiration dates will expire by the
end of 2015.
IV. Requests To Add Additional Item Names to Existing EX Classification
Approvals
We often receive applications to add fireworks device item names to
an existing EX classification approval. Only a manufacturer or its
designated agent may submit a request after June 29, 2011 to add an
additional item name to an existing EX approval.
If anyone other than the manufacturer or its designated agent holds
an existing EX classification approval and it is desired to add
additional items to that approval, then the manufacturer or its
designated agent must submit the EX classification approval as a new
application.
V. Firework Applications Denied Before June 29, 2011
Firework applications resubmitted after June 29, 2011 by any
person, company or entity other than the manufacturer or its designated
agent that were previously denied will not be accepted unless those
applications are submitted by the manufacturer or its designated agent
as the applicant. The manufacturer must sign and certify that the
device for which the approval is requested conforms to the APA Standard
87-1, and the descriptions and technical information contained in the
application are complete and accurate in accordance with Sec.
173.56(j)(3).
VI. Non-Transferability of EX Approvals
EX approvals are non-transferrable, and therefore, may not be sold
or transferred. Accordingly, EX approvals cannot be acquired in
connection with any sale of assets, sale of business, acquisition or
merger. PHMSA may find a company in violation of the HMR should a
manufacturer attempt to use an EX approval issued by PHMSA to another
company for manufacturing of the device. The manufacturer or its
designated agent must submit an application for a new approval. The
manufacturer must sign and certify that the device for which the
approval is requested conforms to the APA Standard 87-1, and the
descriptions and technical information contained in the application are
complete and accurate in accordance with Sec. 173.56(j)(3). If
approved, PHMSA will issue a new EX approval to the manufacturer
specified in the application.
Summary
PHMSA's Office of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS), Approvals
Office will continue to issue approvals only to fireworks manufacturers
and accept applications only from manufacturers or their designated
agents. Consistent with this policy, we will only reissue EX
classification approvals with expiration dates that have been submitted
by the manufacturer or its designated agent. If the manufacturer was
not the original applicant, the manufacturer or its
[[Page 431]]
designated agent must submit the application as a new application.
However, we will provide an extended expiration date of two years for
EX classification approvals that expire through December 31, 2012.
Additionally, we will only accept applications that seek to add new
item names to existing EX classification approvals from the
manufacturer or its designated agent. If the manufacturer was not the
original applicant, the application must be submitted by the
manufacturer or its designated agent as a new application. Further,
applications from non-manufacturers that were denied prior to June 29,
2011 must be resubmitted by the manufacturer.
Finally, EX approvals are non-transferable, and therefore may not
be sold or transferred.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 30, 2011.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-33853 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P