Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Geographic Partnership Programs, 262-263 [2011-33701]
Download as PDF
262
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 2012 / Notices
Development, STOP 0742, 1400
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20250–0742. All responses to this
notice will be summarized and included
in the request for OMB approval. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Judith A. Canales,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–33687 Filed 1–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Geographic
Partnership Programs
U.S. Census Bureau.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before March 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Gregory Hanks, U.S.
Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233–
7400, (301) 763–3093 (or via email at
Gregory.F.Hanks.Jr@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The mission of the Geography
Division within the Census Bureau is to
plan, coordinate, and administer all
geographic and cartographic activities
needed to facilitate Census Bureau
statistical programs throughout the
United States and its territories. The
Geography Division manages programs
to continuously update features,
boundaries, addresses, and geographic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jan 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
entities in the Master Address File/
Topologically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing System
(MAF/TIGER) database (MTDB). The
Geography Division also conducts
research into geographic concepts,
methods, and standards needed to
facilitate Census Bureau data collection
and dissemination programs.
Geographic Partnership Programs
(GPPs) allow designated participants,
following Census Bureau guidelines, to
review, update, and suggest
modifications to addresses, features,
boundaries, and geographic entities to
maintain the Census Bureau MTDB and
to ensure the accurate reporting of data
from censuses and surveys. Because
tribal, state, and local governments have
address data, spatial data, and current
knowledge about where growth and
change are occurring in their
jurisdictions, their input into the overall
development of a continually
maintained address list for censuses and
surveys makes a vital contribution.
Similarly, the Census Bureau recognizes
that tribal, state, and local governments
usually have the most authoritative data
for addresses, features, and geographic
boundaries in their jurisdictions. The
benefits to local jurisdictions in sharing
that information as part of the Census
Bureau’s geographic programs are
realized in more accurate results of
censuses and surveys.
II. Method of Collection
This pre-submission notice is for a
generic clearance that will cover a
number of activities required for
updating the MTDB with participantprovided address and other geographic
information, or obtaining address and
spatial data for research and evaluation
purposes. The information collected in
these programs in cooperation with
tribal, state, and local governments and
other partners is essential to the mission
of the Census Bureau and directly
contributes to the successful outcome of
censuses and surveys conducted by the
Census Bureau. The generic clearance
allows the Census Bureau to focus its
limited resources on actual operational
planning, development of procedures,
and implementation of programs to
update and improve the geographic
information maintained in the MTDB.
The Census Bureau will develop
guidelines and procedures for tribal,
state, and local government submissions
of address data and geographic
boundaries, and will outline the mutual
roles and responsibilities of each party
within each Geographic Partnership
Program. The list below includes typical
geographic partnership programs, but is
not exhaustive of all activities that may
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be performed under this generic
clearance. The Census Bureau will
follow the approved procedure when
submitting any additional activities not
specifically listed here.
A. Geographic Support System Initiative
(GSS–I)
The GSS–I is an integrated program
designed to improve address coverage,
obtain continual spatial feature updates,
and enhance the quality assessment and
measurement for the MTDB. The GSS–
I builds on the accomplishments of the
last decade’s MAF/TIGER Enhancement
Program (the MTEP) which redesigned
the MTDB, improved the positional
accuracy of TIGER spatial features, and
emphasized quality measurement. The
Census Bureau plans on a continual
update process for the MAF/TIGER
throughout the decade to support
current surveys, including the American
Community Survey. Major participants
are the U.S. Census Bureau with tribal,
state, and local governments. The
Census Bureau will contact tribal, state,
and local governments to obtain files
containing their address and spatial
data, to explore data exchange
opportunities, and share best practices.
B. Redistricting Data Program
The 2010 Census Redistricting Data
Program is established in accordance
with the provisions of Title 13 U.S.C.
141(C) and provides the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico the
opportunity to specify the small
geographic areas for which they wish to
receive decennial census population
totals for the purpose of
reapportionment and redistricting. The
law requires that the Census Bureau
allow those having responsibility for
apportionment or districting of each
State be given the opportunity to specify
geographic areas for which they wish to
receive decennial census population
counts. The law also requires that by
April 1 of the year following the
decennial census the Secretary of
Commerce will furnish State officials or
their designee(s) with population counts
for standard census tabulation areas
(e.g., counties, cities, census blocks, and
Congressional districts) and if provided
by the states, legislative districts and
voting districts.
The States had the opportunity to
verify the inclusion of their voting
districts and suggested tabulation block
boundary features during 2009 and early
2010, to ensure the voting district
boundaries that were used by the
Census Bureau are consistent with their
submissions. In Phase 4 of the 2010
Redistricting Data Program, scheduled
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 2012 / Notices
to extend through 2012 and into 2013,
States submit new plans for updated
congressional and state legislative
districts that will be used for
retabulating the 2010 Census data to
these new redistricted boundaries.
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. School District Review Program
(SDRP)
The Census Bureau conducts the
SDRP every two years under contract
from the National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES) of the U.S. Department
of Education. The Census Bureau invites
state education officials to participate in
the review and update of its national
inventory of school district boundaries
and district information. State education
officials collaborate with local
superintendents on their responses. The
participants review and provide updates
and corrections to the elementary,
secondary, and unified school district
names and Federal Local Education
Agency (LEA) identification numbers,
school district boundaries, and the
grade ranges for which a school district
is financially responsible. The
participants submit updated digital
spatial files back to the Census Bureau.
The Census Bureau uses the updated
school district information along with
the most current Census population and
income data, current population
estimates, and tabulations of
administrative records data, to form the
Census Bureau’s estimates of the
number of children aged 5 through 17
in low-income families for each school
district. These estimates of the number
of children in low-income families
residing within each school district are
the basis of the funding allocation for
each school district under Title I of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act as amended by the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001, Public Law (Pub.
L.) 107–110.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607–0795.
Form Number: Not available at this
time.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: State, local, and tribal
governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
39,109.
Estimated Time per Response:
5–50 Hours (the 5 hours of burden is for
39,000. governments and the 50 hours is
for 100 respondents).
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 200,450.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: No
monetary cost to the respondent.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 141
and 193.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jan 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 28, 2011.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–33701 Filed 1–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–826, C–475–827, A–588–847]
Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate From Italy and Japan:
Revocation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the International
Trade Commission (the ‘‘ITC’’) that
revocation of the antidumping duty
(‘‘AD’’) orders on certain cut-to-length
carbon-quality steel plate (‘‘CTL Plate’’)
from Italy and Japan and of the
countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on
CTL Plate from Italy would not be likely
to lead to the continuation or recurrence
of material injury to an industry in the
United States, the Department is
publishing this notice of revocation of
these AD and CVD orders.
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Darzenta Tzafolias (AD orders) or
Eric Greynolds (CVD order), AD/CVD
Operations, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
263
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0922 and (202) 482–6071,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2010, the Department
of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’)
initiated and the ITC instituted sunset
reviews of the AD and CVD orders on
CTL Plate from India, Indonesia, Italy,
Japan, and the Republic of Korea,
pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’), respectively. See Initiation of
Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR
67082 (November 1, 2010). As a result
of its reviews, the Department found
that revocation of the AD orders would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping and that revocation of the
CVD order would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidization, and
notified the ITC of the margins of
dumping and the subsidy rates likely to
prevail were the orders revoked. See
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy,
Japan, and the Republic of Korea; Final
Results of the Expedited Second Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders, 76 FR 12322 (March 7, 2011),
and Certain Cut-to-Length CarbonQuality Steel Plate From India,
Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Review, 76 FR 12702 (March 8, 2011).
On December 27, 2011, the ITC
determined that revocation of the AD
and CVD orders on CTL Plate from Italy
and Japan would not be likely to lead to
the continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. See Cut-To-Length
Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India,
Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea, 76
FR 80963 (December 27, 2011) and
USITC Publication 4296 (December
2011), entitled Cut-to-Length CarbonQuality Steel Plate From India,
Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the
Republic of Korea (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–
388–391 and 731–TA–817–821 (Second
Review)).
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to the AD
and CVD orders is certain hot-rolled
carbon-quality steel: (1) Universal mill
plates (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on
four faces or in a closed box pass, of a
width exceeding 150 mm but not
exceeding 1250 mm, and of a nominal
or actual thickness of not less than 4
mm, which are cut-to-length (not in
coils) and without patterns in relief), of
iron or non-alloy-quality steel; and (2)
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 262-263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33701]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Geographic
Partnership Programs
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before March 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Gregory Hanks, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC
20233-7400, (301) 763-3093 (or via email at
Gregory.F.Hanks.Jr@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The mission of the Geography Division within the Census Bureau is
to plan, coordinate, and administer all geographic and cartographic
activities needed to facilitate Census Bureau statistical programs
throughout the United States and its territories. The Geography
Division manages programs to continuously update features, boundaries,
addresses, and geographic entities in the Master Address File/
Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing System
(MAF/TIGER) database (MTDB). The Geography Division also conducts
research into geographic concepts, methods, and standards needed to
facilitate Census Bureau data collection and dissemination programs.
Geographic Partnership Programs (GPPs) allow designated
participants, following Census Bureau guidelines, to review, update,
and suggest modifications to addresses, features, boundaries, and
geographic entities to maintain the Census Bureau MTDB and to ensure
the accurate reporting of data from censuses and surveys. Because
tribal, state, and local governments have address data, spatial data,
and current knowledge about where growth and change are occurring in
their jurisdictions, their input into the overall development of a
continually maintained address list for censuses and surveys makes a
vital contribution. Similarly, the Census Bureau recognizes that
tribal, state, and local governments usually have the most
authoritative data for addresses, features, and geographic boundaries
in their jurisdictions. The benefits to local jurisdictions in sharing
that information as part of the Census Bureau's geographic programs are
realized in more accurate results of censuses and surveys.
II. Method of Collection
This pre-submission notice is for a generic clearance that will
cover a number of activities required for updating the MTDB with
participant-provided address and other geographic information, or
obtaining address and spatial data for research and evaluation
purposes. The information collected in these programs in cooperation
with tribal, state, and local governments and other partners is
essential to the mission of the Census Bureau and directly contributes
to the successful outcome of censuses and surveys conducted by the
Census Bureau. The generic clearance allows the Census Bureau to focus
its limited resources on actual operational planning, development of
procedures, and implementation of programs to update and improve the
geographic information maintained in the MTDB.
The Census Bureau will develop guidelines and procedures for
tribal, state, and local government submissions of address data and
geographic boundaries, and will outline the mutual roles and
responsibilities of each party within each Geographic Partnership
Program. The list below includes typical geographic partnership
programs, but is not exhaustive of all activities that may be performed
under this generic clearance. The Census Bureau will follow the
approved procedure when submitting any additional activities not
specifically listed here.
A. Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I)
The GSS-I is an integrated program designed to improve address
coverage, obtain continual spatial feature updates, and enhance the
quality assessment and measurement for the MTDB. The GSS-I builds on
the accomplishments of the last decade's MAF/TIGER Enhancement Program
(the MTEP) which redesigned the MTDB, improved the positional accuracy
of TIGER spatial features, and emphasized quality measurement. The
Census Bureau plans on a continual update process for the MAF/TIGER
throughout the decade to support current surveys, including the
American Community Survey. Major participants are the U.S. Census
Bureau with tribal, state, and local governments. The Census Bureau
will contact tribal, state, and local governments to obtain files
containing their address and spatial data, to explore data exchange
opportunities, and share best practices.
B. Redistricting Data Program
The 2010 Census Redistricting Data Program is established in
accordance with the provisions of Title 13 U.S.C. 141(C) and provides
the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico the opportunity to specify the small geographic areas for which
they wish to receive decennial census population totals for the purpose
of reapportionment and redistricting. The law requires that the Census
Bureau allow those having responsibility for apportionment or
districting of each State be given the opportunity to specify
geographic areas for which they wish to receive decennial census
population counts. The law also requires that by April 1 of the year
following the decennial census the Secretary of Commerce will furnish
State officials or their designee(s) with population counts for
standard census tabulation areas (e.g., counties, cities, census
blocks, and Congressional districts) and if provided by the states,
legislative districts and voting districts.
The States had the opportunity to verify the inclusion of their
voting districts and suggested tabulation block boundary features
during 2009 and early 2010, to ensure the voting district boundaries
that were used by the Census Bureau are consistent with their
submissions. In Phase 4 of the 2010 Redistricting Data Program,
scheduled
[[Page 263]]
to extend through 2012 and into 2013, States submit new plans for
updated congressional and state legislative districts that will be used
for retabulating the 2010 Census data to these new redistricted
boundaries.
C. School District Review Program (SDRP)
The Census Bureau conducts the SDRP every two years under contract
from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of the U.S.
Department of Education. The Census Bureau invites state education
officials to participate in the review and update of its national
inventory of school district boundaries and district information. State
education officials collaborate with local superintendents on their
responses. The participants review and provide updates and corrections
to the elementary, secondary, and unified school district names and
Federal Local Education Agency (LEA) identification numbers, school
district boundaries, and the grade ranges for which a school district
is financially responsible. The participants submit updated digital
spatial files back to the Census Bureau.
The Census Bureau uses the updated school district information
along with the most current Census population and income data, current
population estimates, and tabulations of administrative records data,
to form the Census Bureau's estimates of the number of children aged 5
through 17 in low-income families for each school district. These
estimates of the number of children in low-income families residing
within each school district are the basis of the funding allocation for
each school district under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001,
Public Law (Pub. L.) 107-110.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607-0795.
Form Number: Not available at this time.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: State, local, and tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 39,109.
Estimated Time per Response: 5-50 Hours (the 5 hours of burden is
for 39,000. governments and the 50 hours is for 100 respondents).
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 200,450.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: No monetary cost to the respondent.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 141 and 193.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: December 28, 2011.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-33701 Filed 1-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P