Final Reissuance of General NPDES Permits (GP) for Facilities Related to Oil and Gas Extraction, 123 [2011-33663]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2012 / Notices or expansion of an existing roadway to add a new lane or lanes, typically takes many months and involves intensive land disturbance (clearing, grading, cut and fill, excavation, etc.), whereas construction of an individual pad for an electric utility transmission line tower and/or pole may last a matter of days or weeks. Based on the length of such electric utility transmission line construction projects, the multitude of discharge points, the distance between such discharge points, and the relatively brief construction period, EPA solicits comments on whether it would be practical to require such dischargers to identify all discharge points in the notice of intent to be covered for their permit, for the permitting authority to determine representative discharge points, and for the discharger to monitor at the numerous points where monitoring would potentially be required for these types of projects. EPA solicits comments on the information provided to EPA by UWAG and additional data on construction of electric utility transmission lines to support or refute the ability of these projects to implement controls and monitor discharges. Dated: December 27, 2011. Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for Water. [FR Doc. 2011–33661 Filed 12–30–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–9615–1] Final Reissuance of General NPDES Permits (GP) for Facilities Related to Oil and Gas Extraction Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10. ACTION: Final Notice of reissuance of a general permit. AGENCY: A GP regulating the activities of facilities related to oil and gas extraction on the North Slope of the Brooks Range, Alaska expired on January 2, 2009. On July 2, 2009, EPA proposed to reissue the GP expanding the coverage area to the TransAlaska Pipeline Corridor along with other potential corridors. There was a 45 day comment period. During the comment period, EPA received many comments and decided to make changes to the draft based on the comments received. On August 2, 2011, EPA re-noticed the GP with a new Fact Sheet requesting pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:13 Dec 30, 2011 Jkt 226001 new comments. The comment permit ended on September 17, 2011. EPA received several comments, the major one being a request not to cover the pipeline corridors under this GP. EPA agreed so the final coverage area reverts back to the North Slope Borough, Alaska. EPA has also renumbered the permit to distinguish it from the previous GP which covered more types of discharges. DATES: The GP (Permit Number AKG– 33–1000 formerly AKG–33–0000) will be effective February 2, 2012. Facilities with administratively extended coverage under the expired GP whose discharges are covered by the GP will be covered on the effective date of this GP thus ending any administrative extension for those permittees. Facilities that are not covered by the new GP but have administratively extended coverage under the previous GP will continue to have coverage under AKG– 33–0000 until a new permit is issued to address those discharges. ADDRESSES: Copies of the GP and Response to Comments are available upon request. Written requests may be submitted to EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, OWW–130, Seattle, WA 98101. Electronic requests may be mailed to: washington.audrey@epa.gov or godsey.cindi@epa.gov FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The GP, Fact Sheet and Response to Comments may be found on the Region 10 Web site at https://yosemite.epa.gov/ r10/water.nsf/NPDES+Permits/ General+NPDES+Permits. Requests by telephone may be made to Audrey Washington at (206) 553–0523 or to Cindi Godsey at (907) 271–6561. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866: The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from the review requirements of Executive Order 12866 pursuant to Section 6 of that order. The state of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), certified on December 19, 2011, that the subject discharges comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208(e), 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. Regulatory Flexibility Act: Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., a Federal agency must prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis ‘‘for any proposed rule’’ for which the agency ‘‘is required by section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), or any other law, to publish general notice of proposed rulemaking.’’ The RFA exempts from this requirement any rule that the issuing agency certifies ‘‘will not, if PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 123 promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.’’ EPA has concluded that NPDES general permits are permits, not rulemakings, under the APA and thus not subject to APA rulemaking requirements or the RFA. Notwithstanding that general permits are not subject to the RFA, EPA has determined that these general permits, as issued, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Dated: December 22, 2011. Michael A. Bussell, Director, Office of Water & Watersheds, Region 10, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [FR Doc. 2011–33663 Filed 12–30–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–9615–2] Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; North Hollywood Operable Unit of the San Fernando Valley Area 1 Superfund Site Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice; request for public comment. AGENCY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement for recovery of response costs concerning the North Hollywood Operable Unit of the San Fernando Valley Area 1 Superfund Site, located in the vicinity of Los Angeles, California, with the following settling party: Waste Management Recycling & Disposal Services of California, Inc., dba Bradley Landfill & Recycling Center. The settlement requires the settling party to pay a total of $185,734 to the North Hollywood Operable Unit Special Account within the Hazardous Substance Superfund. The settlement also includes a covenant not to sue the settling party pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM 03JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9615-1]


Final Reissuance of General NPDES Permits (GP) for Facilities 
Related to Oil and Gas Extraction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10.

ACTION: Final Notice of reissuance of a general permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A GP regulating the activities of facilities related to oil 
and gas extraction on the North Slope of the Brooks Range, Alaska 
expired on January 2, 2009. On July 2, 2009, EPA proposed to reissue 
the GP expanding the coverage area to the TransAlaska Pipeline Corridor 
along with other potential corridors. There was a 45 day comment 
period. During the comment period, EPA received many comments and 
decided to make changes to the draft based on the comments received. On 
August 2, 2011, EPA re-noticed the GP with a new Fact Sheet requesting 
new comments. The comment permit ended on September 17, 2011.
    EPA received several comments, the major one being a request not to 
cover the pipeline corridors under this GP. EPA agreed so the final 
coverage area reverts back to the North Slope Borough, Alaska. EPA has 
also renumbered the permit to distinguish it from the previous GP which 
covered more types of discharges.

DATES: The GP (Permit Number AKG-33-1000 formerly AKG-33-0000) will be 
effective February 2, 2012. Facilities with administratively extended 
coverage under the expired GP whose discharges are covered by the GP 
will be covered on the effective date of this GP thus ending any 
administrative extension for those permittees. Facilities that are not 
covered by the new GP but have administratively extended coverage under 
the previous GP will continue to have coverage under AKG-33-0000 until 
a new permit is issued to address those discharges.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the GP and Response to Comments are available upon 
request. Written requests may be submitted to EPA, Region 10, 1200 
Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, OWW-130, Seattle, WA 98101. Electronic 
requests may be mailed to: washington.audrey@epa.gov or 
godsey.cindi@epa.gov

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The GP, Fact Sheet and Response to 
Comments may be found on the Region 10 Web site at https://
yosemite.epa.gov/r10/water.nsf/NPDES+Permits/General+NPDES+Permits. 
Requests by telephone may be made to Audrey Washington at (206) 553-
0523 or to Cindi Godsey at (907) 271-6561.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Executive Order 12866: The Office of Management and Budget has 
exempted this action from the review requirements of Executive Order 
12866 pursuant to Section 6 of that order.
    The state of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation 
(ADEC), certified on December 19, 2011, that the subject discharges 
comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208(e), 301, 302, 306 
and 307 of the Clean Water Act.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act: Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., a Federal agency must prepare an initial 
regulatory flexibility analysis ``for any proposed rule'' for which the 
agency ``is required by section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act 
(APA), or any other law, to publish general notice of proposed 
rulemaking.'' The RFA exempts from this requirement any rule that the 
issuing agency certifies ``will not, if promulgated, have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' EPA has 
concluded that NPDES general permits are permits, not rulemakings, 
under the APA and thus not subject to APA rulemaking requirements or 
the RFA. Notwithstanding that general permits are not subject to the 
RFA, EPA has determined that these general permits, as issued, will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.

    Dated: December 22, 2011.
Michael A. Bussell,
Director, Office of Water & Watersheds, Region 10, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-33663 Filed 12-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.