Golden Eagles; Programmatic Take Permit Application; Draft Environmental Assessment; West Butte Wind Project, Crook and Deschutes Counties, OR, 129-130 [2011-33630]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2012 / Notices
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 57,000 responses at 1.6 hours
(1 hour and 36 minutes) per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 91,200 annual burden hours.
If you need a copy of the information
collection instrument, please visit the
Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov.
We may also be contacted at: USCIS,
Regulatory Products Division, 20
Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2020;
Telephone (202) 272–8377.
Dated: December 27, 2011.
Constance Carter,
Deputy Chief, Office of the Executive
Secretariat, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–33624 Filed 12–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–MB–2011–N245;
FXMB12320100000P2–123–FF01M01000]
Introduction
Golden Eagles; Programmatic Take
Permit Application; Draft
Environmental Assessment; West
Butte Wind Project, Crook and
Deschutes Counties, OR
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We have received an
application under the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) from West
Butte Wind Power, LLC, for a
programmatic permit for the take of
golden eagles. If issued, the permit
would be the first programmatic permit
issued under our new permitting
regulations. We invite public comment
on a draft environmental assessment
(DEA), which evaluates alternatives for
this permit application.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by
February 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy
of the DEA on the Internet at https://
www.fws.gov/pacific/migratorybirds/
nepa.html. Alternatively, you may use
one of the methods below to request
hard copies or a CD–ROM of the
documents. Please specify the ‘‘DEA for
the West Butte Wind Project’’ on all
correspondence.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit comments or requests for copies
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Dec 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
or more information by one of the
following methods.
• Email: pacific_birds@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘DEA for the West Butte Wind
Project’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• U.S. Mail: Please address written
comments to Michael Green, Acting
Chief, Division of Migratory Birds and
Habitat Programs, Pacific Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th
Ave., Portland, OR 97232.
• Fax: Michael Green, Acting Chief,
Division of Migratory Birds and Habitat
Programs, (503) 231–2019, Attn.: DEA
for the West Butte Wind Project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Green, Acting Chief, Division of
Migratory Birds and Habitat Programs,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (503)
231–2019 (phone);
pacific_birds@fws.gov (email, include
‘‘DEA for the West Butte Wind Project’’
in the subject line of the message). If
you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), please call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is
considering an application under the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(16 U.S.C. 668a–d; BGEPA) for a
programmatic golden eagle (Aquila
chrysaetos) take permit from West Butte
Wind Power, LLC. The company plans
to develop the West Butte wind-power
project in central Oregon, and there is
a risk of eagle fatalities as a result of the
operation of this facility. The
application includes an avian and bat
protection plan combined with an eagle
conservation plan that describes actions
taken and proposed future actions to
avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse
effects on eagles. The eagle conservation
plan was developed in collaboration
with the Service.
The Draft Environmental Assessment
(DEA) analyzes the alternatives
associated with this permit application
in light of our BGEPA permitting
regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 22.26. If
the results of this analysis lead us to
issue this permit, it will be the first
programmatic permit issued under these
new regulations, as well as the first
eagle take permit issued to a windenergy company.
Background
BGEPA allows us to authorize bald
eagle and golden eagle programmatic
take (take that is recurring, is not caused
solely by indirect effects, and that
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
129
occurs over the long term or in a
location or locations that cannot be
specifically identified). Such take must
be incidental to actions that are
otherwise lawful. BGEPA’s
implementing regulations define ‘‘take’’
as ‘‘to pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison,
wound, kill, capture, trap, collect,
destroy, molest, or disturb individuals,
their nests and eggs’’ (50 CFR 22.3); and
‘‘disturb’’ is further defined as ‘‘to
agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle
to a degree that causes * * * injury to
an eagle, * * * a decrease in its
productivity, * * * or nest
abandonment’’ (50 CFR 22.3). The West
Butte Wind Project potentially will
result in one or more recurring eagle
mortalities over the life of the project, so
the appropriate type of take permit is
the programmatic permit under 50 CFR
22.26.
To obtain a programmatic permit
under BGEPA and 50 CFR 22.26, the
applicant must (1) avoid and minimize
take to the maximum extent achievable;
(2) conduct adequate monitoring to
determine effects; (3) offset through
compensatory mitigation any remaining
take, such that the net effect on the eagle
population is, at a minimum, no change
for eagle management populations that
cannot sustain additional mortality; and
(4) ensure that the direct and indirect
effects of the take and required
mitigation, together with the cumulative
effects of other permitted take and
additional factors affecting eagle
populations, are compatible with the
preservation of bald eagles and golden
eagles.
Applicant’s Proposal
The 104-megawatt (MW) project is to
be built in Crook and Deschutes
Counties, Oregon. As a result of
monitoring studies conducted on the
proposed project site, the applicant
considers the use of the site by eagles to
be low, and has requested in their
application a permit for the legal take of
‘‘1 to 2 Golden Eagles over the 20 to 30
year life of the project.’’
The applicant developed an eagle
conservation plan, following
recommendations provided by the
Service (Draft Eagle Conservation Plan
Guidance, January 2011, https://
www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/
ECP_draft_guidance_2_10_final_
clean_omb.pdf). As recommended in
the Service’s guidance, the applicant’s
plan outlines avoidance and
minimization measures and advanced
conservation practices, assesses risk
from pre-construction monitoring data,
makes commitments for mitigating eagle
mortalities, and commits to postconstruction monitoring. This plan was
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
130
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 3, 2012 / Notices
submitted as part of the permit
application, and if we issue the permit
following the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) process, then the
conservation commitments would
become conditions of the permit.
The Service independently evaluated
the risk of eagle fatalities from the
construction of this project and
compared that risk to the conservation
measures, largely mitigation actions, to
which the applicant has committed.
This is an essential step in the Service’s
evaluation of an application for a permit
for programmatic take of eagles, since
issuing criteria require permitted take to
be in compliance with the BGEPA’s
preservation standard. The Service has
interpreted this standard to require
maintenance of stable or increasing
breeding populations of eagles (74 FR
46836; September 11, 2009). The
evaluation of risk and offsetting
conservation measures, and the
implications for direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects under three
alternatives, are discussed in detail in
the DEA.
Dated: December 19, 2011.
Richard Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region,
Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011–33630 Filed 12–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNMP02000
L51100000.GE0000.LVEMG11CG200]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Intercontinental Potash
Corporation (ICP) (USA) Ochoa Mine
Project, Lea County, NM
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
Next Steps
The public process for the proposed
Federal permit action will be completed
after the public comment period, at
which time we will evaluate the permit
application and comments submitted
thereon to determine whether the
application meets the permitting
requirements under BGEPA, applicable
regulations, and NEPA requirements.
Upon completion of that evaluation, we
will select our course of action.
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, (NEPA) and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Carlsbad Field
Office, Carlsbad, NM intends to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and by this notice is announcing
the beginning of the scoping process to
solicit public comments and identify
issues.
DATES:
Public Comments
We invite public comment on the
proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
submit comments by any one of the
methods discussed above under
ADDRESSES.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comments, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
You can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, but we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under section
668a of the Act (16 U.S.C. 668–668c)
and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Dec 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
SUMMARY:
This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the EIS. Comments
on issues may be submitted in writing
until February 2, 2012. The date(s) and
location(s) of any scoping meetings will
be announced at least 15 days in
advance through local media,
newspapers and the BLM Web site at:
https://www.blm.gov/nm/st/en/fo/
Carlsbad_Field_Office.html. To be
included in the Draft EIS, all comments
must be received prior to the close of
the scoping period or 15 days after the
last public meeting, whichever is later.
We will provide additional
opportunities for public participation
upon publication of the Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments on issues related to the ICP
Ochoa Mine Project by any of the
following methods:
• Email: David_Alderman@blm.gov
• Fax: (575) 885–9264
• Mail: Bureau of Land Management,
Carlsbad Field Office, Attention: Ochoa
Mine EIS Project Manager, 620 E.
Greene St., Carlsbad, NM 88220.
Documents pertinent to this proposal
may be examined at the Carlsbad Field
Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information and/or to have your
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
name added to our mailing list, contact
David Alderman, Planning and
Environmental Coordinator; telephone
(575) 234–6232; address, Carlsbad Field
Office 620 E. Greene St., Carlsbad, NM
88220; email David_Alderman@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-(800) 877–8339 to contact
the above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Intercontinental Potash Corp. (USA)
(ICP) holds BLM prospecting permits
and has applied for preference right
leases. ICP plans to develop an
underground mine to extract polyhalite
ore. These prospecting permits are
located about 40 miles southeast of
Carlsbad, New Mexico, and 20 miles
west of Jal, New Mexico. The proposed
project would occur on portions of the
following townships and ranges:
New Mexico Prime Meridian
T. 22 S., R. 33 E.,
T. 22 S., R. 35 E.,
T. 23 S., R. 32 E.,
T. 23 S., R. 33 E.,
T. 23 S., R. 34 E.,
T. 23 S., R. 37 E.,
T. 24 S., R. 32 E.,
T. 24 S., R. 33 E.,
T. 24 S., R. 34 E.,
T. 24 S., R. 35 E.,
T. 24 S., R. 36 E.,
T. 24 S., R. 37 E.,
T. 25 S., R. 37 E.,
The areas described, including
Federal, State, and nonpublic lands,
total 276,480 acres. ICP holds 17 State
leases, totaling 25,889 acres in addition
to the 26 prospecting permits totaling
77,884 acres. ICP has submitted a
proposed Mine Plan of Operations to the
BLM for the Ochoa Mine Project, to
produce the fertilizer sulfate of potash,
K2SO4, from polyhalite ore. ICP’s
proposed Mine Plan of Operations
includes an underground mine accessed
by a shaft and a ramp, and processing
facilities, including the ore process
plant, dry stack tailings pile,
evaporation ponds, water wells,
pipelines, power lines, and a railroad
load-out facility. The polyhalite will be
continuously mined using the
conventional room and pillar retreat
method. In order to mine in proximity
to active oil and gas wells, ICP has
elected to follow the rules and
regulations of a Category IV gassy mine.
Sulfate of potash production involves
two separate operations. The first
operation is to mine raw polyhalite
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 129-130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33630]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-MB-2011-N245; FXMB12320100000P2-123-FF01M01000]
Golden Eagles; Programmatic Take Permit Application; Draft
Environmental Assessment; West Butte Wind Project, Crook and Deschutes
Counties, OR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We have received an application under the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) from West Butte Wind Power, LLC, for a
programmatic permit for the take of golden eagles. If issued, the
permit would be the first programmatic permit issued under our new
permitting regulations. We invite public comment on a draft
environmental assessment (DEA), which evaluates alternatives for this
permit application.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
February 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy of the DEA on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/pacific/migratorybirds/nepa.html. Alternatively, you may
use one of the methods below to request hard copies or a CD-ROM of the
documents. Please specify the ``DEA for the West Butte Wind Project''
on all correspondence.
Submitting Comments: You may submit comments or requests for copies
or more information by one of the following methods.
Email: pacific_birds@fws.gov. Include ``DEA for the West
Butte Wind Project'' in the subject line of the message.
U.S. Mail: Please address written comments to Michael
Green, Acting Chief, Division of Migratory Birds and Habitat Programs,
Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th Ave.,
Portland, OR 97232.
Fax: Michael Green, Acting Chief, Division of Migratory
Birds and Habitat Programs, (503) 231-2019, Attn.: DEA for the West
Butte Wind Project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Green, Acting Chief, Division
of Migratory Birds and Habitat Programs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, (503) 231-2019 (phone); pacific_birds@fws.gov (email, include
``DEA for the West Butte Wind Project'' in the subject line of the
message). If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD),
please call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is considering an application
under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668a-d;
BGEPA) for a programmatic golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) take permit
from West Butte Wind Power, LLC. The company plans to develop the West
Butte wind-power project in central Oregon, and there is a risk of
eagle fatalities as a result of the operation of this facility. The
application includes an avian and bat protection plan combined with an
eagle conservation plan that describes actions taken and proposed
future actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse effects on
eagles. The eagle conservation plan was developed in collaboration with
the Service.
The Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) analyzes the alternatives
associated with this permit application in light of our BGEPA
permitting regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR 22.26. If the results of this analysis lead us to issue this
permit, it will be the first programmatic permit issued under these new
regulations, as well as the first eagle take permit issued to a wind-
energy company.
Background
BGEPA allows us to authorize bald eagle and golden eagle
programmatic take (take that is recurring, is not caused solely by
indirect effects, and that occurs over the long term or in a location
or locations that cannot be specifically identified). Such take must be
incidental to actions that are otherwise lawful. BGEPA's implementing
regulations define ``take'' as ``to pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison,
wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, or disturb
individuals, their nests and eggs'' (50 CFR 22.3); and ``disturb'' is
further defined as ``to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a
degree that causes * * * injury to an eagle, * * * a decrease in its
productivity, * * * or nest abandonment'' (50 CFR 22.3). The West Butte
Wind Project potentially will result in one or more recurring eagle
mortalities over the life of the project, so the appropriate type of
take permit is the programmatic permit under 50 CFR 22.26.
To obtain a programmatic permit under BGEPA and 50 CFR 22.26, the
applicant must (1) avoid and minimize take to the maximum extent
achievable; (2) conduct adequate monitoring to determine effects; (3)
offset through compensatory mitigation any remaining take, such that
the net effect on the eagle population is, at a minimum, no change for
eagle management populations that cannot sustain additional mortality;
and (4) ensure that the direct and indirect effects of the take and
required mitigation, together with the cumulative effects of other
permitted take and additional factors affecting eagle populations, are
compatible with the preservation of bald eagles and golden eagles.
Applicant's Proposal
The 104-megawatt (MW) project is to be built in Crook and Deschutes
Counties, Oregon. As a result of monitoring studies conducted on the
proposed project site, the applicant considers the use of the site by
eagles to be low, and has requested in their application a permit for
the legal take of ``1 to 2 Golden Eagles over the 20 to 30 year life of
the project.''
The applicant developed an eagle conservation plan, following
recommendations provided by the Service (Draft Eagle Conservation Plan
Guidance, January 2011, https://www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/ECP_draft_guidance_2_10_final_clean_omb.pdf). As recommended in the
Service's guidance, the applicant's plan outlines avoidance and
minimization measures and advanced conservation practices, assesses
risk from pre-construction monitoring data, makes commitments for
mitigating eagle mortalities, and commits to post-construction
monitoring. This plan was
[[Page 130]]
submitted as part of the permit application, and if we issue the permit
following the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, then
the conservation commitments would become conditions of the permit.
The Service independently evaluated the risk of eagle fatalities
from the construction of this project and compared that risk to the
conservation measures, largely mitigation actions, to which the
applicant has committed. This is an essential step in the Service's
evaluation of an application for a permit for programmatic take of
eagles, since issuing criteria require permitted take to be in
compliance with the BGEPA's preservation standard. The Service has
interpreted this standard to require maintenance of stable or
increasing breeding populations of eagles (74 FR 46836; September 11,
2009). The evaluation of risk and offsetting conservation measures, and
the implications for direct, indirect, and cumulative effects under
three alternatives, are discussed in detail in the DEA.
Next Steps
The public process for the proposed Federal permit action will be
completed after the public comment period, at which time we will
evaluate the permit application and comments submitted thereon to
determine whether the application meets the permitting requirements
under BGEPA, applicable regulations, and NEPA requirements. Upon
completion of that evaluation, we will select our course of action.
Public Comments
We invite public comment on the proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
submit comments by any one of the methods discussed above under
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comments, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. You can ask us
in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 668a of the Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: December 19, 2011.
Richard Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011-33630 Filed 12-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P