Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas, 82212-82218 [2011-33435]
Download as PDF
82212
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(4) If any retract actuator fuse pin having
part number 112W1769–1 is found installed
and the pin has accumulated fewer than
8,000 total flight cycles as of the effective
date of this AD: Before the accumulation of
8,000 total flight cycles on the pin, or within
24 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, replace the fuse pin
with a new part number 112W1769–3 fuse
pin, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–32–0083, Revision 1,
dated February 17, 2011.
(h) Parts Installation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a retract actuator fuse pin
having P/N 112W1769–1 on any airplane.
(i) Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
Actions done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–32–0083,
dated February 5, 2009, are acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding
requirements of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 23, 2011.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–33544 Filed 12–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO01
Grants for Transportation of Veterans
in Highly Rural Areas
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(425) 227–1221.
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations in part 17 to establish a new
program to provide grants to eligible
entities to assist veterans in highly rural
areas through innovative transportation
services to travel to VA medical centers,
and to otherwise assist in providing
transportation services in connection
with the provision of VA medical care
to these veterans. This rulemaking is
necessary to implement new statutory
authority by establishing procedures for
evaluating grant applications under the
new grant program, and otherwise
administering the new grant program.
This proposed rule would implement
section 307 of title III of the Caregivers
and Veterans Omnibus Health Services
Act of 2010 (the 2010 Act).
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before February 28, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://www.
regulations.gov; by mail or hand
delivery to the Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (02REG),
(k) Related Information
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
(1) For more information about this AD,
Vermont Ave. NW., Room 1068,
contact James Sutherland, Aerospace
Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,
(202) 273–9026. Comments should
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
indicate that they are submitted in
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AO01, Grants for
3356; phone: (425) 917–6533; fax: (425) 917–
6590; email: james.sutherland@faa.gov.
Transportation of Veterans in Highly
(2) For service information identified in
Rural Areas.’’ Copies of comments
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
received will be available for public
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Policy and Management, Room 1063B,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30
(206) 544–5000, extension 1; fax (206) 766–
5680; email me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
(this is not a toll-free number) for an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
appointment. In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Riley, Director, Veterans
Transportation Service, Chief Business
Office (10NB), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 2957 Clairmont Road, Atlanta,
GA 30329, (404) 828–5601. (This is not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
307 of the 2010 Act, requires that VA
‘‘establish a grant program to provide
innovative transportation options to
veterans in highly rural areas.’’ To
comply with section 307 of the 2010
Act, VA will award grants to eligible
entities to assist veterans in highly rural
areas to travel to VA medical centers,
and to otherwise assist in providing
transportation in connection with the
provision of VA medical care to these
veterans. This proposed rule would
establish the grant program in
accordance with paragraph (a) of section
307 of the 2010 Act, and establish
regulations for evaluating grant
applications and otherwise
administering the grant program in
accordance with paragraph (b) of section
307 of the 2010 Act.
Section 307(d) of the 2010 Act
authorizes $3,000,000 of appropriated
funds for each fiscal year beginning
2010 through 2014 to carry out the grant
program. We would indicate this
funding limitation for each of the fiscal
years in a Notice of Fund Availability
(NOFA) publication in the Federal
Register, to adequately provide notice to
eligible recipients of the grants. It is not
necessary to include the funding
limitation or to indicate the specific
fiscal years for the program’s funding in
the proposed rule, however, because the
amount of authorized appropriations
may change after fiscal year 2014 and
Congress could extend the program past
fiscal year 2014. Section 307 of the 2010
Act is not designated by Congress to be
a pilot program, and the law does not
otherwise contain a provision that it
will cease to have effect after a specific
date unless extended. By not including
the funding limitation or the specific
fiscal years the program is to be funded
in the proposed rule, we would prevent
having a regulation in the Code of
Federal Regulations that appeared to
restrict or stop the grant program
beyond a certain date, when VA may
still be compelled to administer the
grant program. If funding ceases to be
provided or the grant program is not
extended beyond 2014, we would not
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
publish a subsequent NOFA in the
Federal Register for that following fiscal
year, and we would amend our
regulations to remove the rule from the
Code of Federal Regulations.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
17.700 Purpose and Scope
Proposed § 17.700 would establish the
grant program and explain what the
program provides. This section would
indicate that VA would provide grants
to eligible entities to assist veterans in
highly rural areas to travel to VA
medical centers and to otherwise assist
in providing transportation in
connection with the provision of VA
medical care to such veterans, in
accordance with paragraph (a) of section
307 of the Act.
17.701 Definitions
Proposed § 17.701 would define terms
to be used throughout all proposed
sections, and in Notices of Fund
Availability to be published in the
Federal Register. ‘‘Applicant’’ would be
defined as an eligible entity that submits
an application for a grant announced in
a Notice of Fund Availability. An
‘‘eligible entity’’ would be defined as
either Veterans Service Organizations,
or State veterans service agencies, in
accordance with paragraphs (a)(2)(A)–
(B) of section 307 of the 2010 Act. A
‘‘grantee’’ would be defined as an
applicant that is awarded a grant under
this proposed rule. A ‘‘highly rural
area’’ would be defined as an area
consisting of a county or counties
having a population of less than seven
persons per square mile, consistent with
paragraph (c)(1) of section 307 of the
2010 Act. VA currently monitors and
maintains a specific listing of such
highly rural areas, and grants will only
be awarded to applicants whose
programs will service one or more of
these areas, as identified in the
application. VA will provide the listing
of specific highly rural areas in the
Notice of Fund Availability for the
proposed rule. A ‘‘Notice of Fund
Availability’’ would be defined as a
Notice of Fund Availability published
in the Federal Register in accordance
with § 17.710 of the proposed rule. A
‘‘participant’’ would be defined as a
veteran in a highly rural area who
receives transportation services from a
grantee. A ‘‘State veterans service
agency’’ would be defined as the
element of a State government that has
responsibility for programs and
activities of that government relating to
veterans benefits, for instance the
‘‘Maryland Department of Veterans
Affairs.’’ We do not interpret section
307 of the 2010 Act as permitting VA to
consider cities or counties to be ‘‘State
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
veterans service agencies’’ for purposes
of this proposed rule, as we read the
plain language of the statute to
authorize only a State level entity to be
a grantee within the meaning of this
definition. By definition, VA would not
limit these entities to include only those
which are formally recognized by VA
under 38 U.S.C. 5902, though VA in
practice does recognize under section
5902 veterans service agencies for 46
States. We believe this ensures that
there is the same regulatory distinction
between the two eligible entity types as
Congress intended in section 307 of the
2010 Act. This would also ensure that
every State entity which is responsible
for programs and activities relating to
veterans benefits will be able to apply
for grants even if not recognized by VA
under section 5902. For instance, Alaska
and Wyoming are not among the 46
States recognized under section 5902,
but each has a formal State level entity
responsible for programs and activities
related to veterans benefits, as well as
identified highly rural areas that would
benefit from grants awarded under the
proposed rule.
The ‘‘provision of VA medical care’’
would be defined as the provision of
medical services as defined in section
1710 of title 38 United States Code.
Though paragraph (a)(3)(B) of section
307 of the 2010 Act only specifies ‘‘the
provision of medical care’’ without
distinguishing that the care would be
VA medical care, it is reasonable to
conclude that the intent of section 307
of the 2010 Act is that the transportation
services provided would be in
connection with medical care provided
by VA. We believe this conclusion is
supported by reading paragraphs
(a)(3)(A) and (B) together: Grant funds
must be used to ‘‘assist veterans in
highly rural areas to travel to
Department of Veterans Affairs medical
centers’’ and to ‘‘otherwise assist in
providing transportation in connection
with the provision of medical care to
veterans in highly rural areas.’’ We
interpret the use of the term
‘‘otherwise’’ in paragraph (a)(3)(B) to
expand travel to VA facilities other than
VA medical centers for the provision of
medical care, but not to expand the type
of medical care provided beyond that
provided by VA. Section 307 of the Act
clearly seeks to improve access to VA
medical care for veterans in highly rural
areas through transportation assistance,
and it is this assistance that negates the
need for a veteran to seek what is
perhaps more conveniently located nonVA medical care. ‘‘Transportation
services’’ would be defined as the direct
provision of transportation, or
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
82213
assistance with providing
transportation, to travel to VA medical
centers or in connection with the
provision of VA medical care. We
believe section 307 of the 2010 Act
supports awarding grants for programs
that may not directly transport veterans,
as section 307(a)(3)(A)–(B) makes clear
that an eligible entity may use grant
funds to ‘‘assist’’ veterans to travel to
care, or to otherwise ‘‘assist’’ in
providing transportation in connection
with the provision of care to a veteran.
For instance, grantees may use funds to
initiate ride sharing or car pooling
programs, whereby veterans could be
matched with and share vehicles with
others traveling to the same destinations
at the same times. ‘‘Veterans Service
Organization’’ would be defined as an
organization recognized by the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs for the
representation of veterans under section
5902 of title 38 United States Code, in
accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of
section 307 of the 2010 Act. These
organizations have multiple
representative groupings which are
recognized throughout the United
States. Each of these groupings would
be individually eligible to apply for a
grant, to ensure grant funds are
distributed as broadly as needed.
17.702 Grants—General
Proposed § 17.702 would establish the
general parameters of the grants
themselves. Proposed paragraph (a)
would indicate that VA may award one
grant per fiscal year to a grantee for each
highly rural area in which the grantee
provides transportation services, and
that transportation services may not be
simultaneously provided by more than
one grantee in any single highly rural
area. We would allow a grantee to
receive a grant for each highly rural area
in which the grantee provides
transportation services, to permit State
entities to receive as many grants as
they have designated highly rural areas.
This would help ensure that each highly
rural area receives the maximum
amount of assistance contemplated
under section 307 of the 2010 Act.
Designating that grants are awarded per
fiscal year would ensure that grants are
awarded only when funding is
available, in accordance with paragraph
(d) of section 307 of the 2010 Act. The
prohibition of simultaneous delivery of
transportation services by more than
one grantee in one area would ensure
that as many geographic areas are
serviced as possible each fiscal year, by
preventing a concentration of grant
awards for any single highly rural area.
Proposed paragraph (b) would establish
that the grant amounts will be specified
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
82214
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
in the Notice of Fund Availability, but
that no single grant will exceed $50,000,
to comply with paragraph (a)(4) of
section 307 of the 2010 Act. Proposed
paragraph (c) would specify that an
applicant would not be required to
provide matching funds as a condition
of receiving a grant, in accordance with
paragraph (a)(5) of section 307 of the
2010 Act. Proposed paragraph (d) would
specify that a veteran who is provided
transportation services via grant funds
will not be charged for such services, to
ensure that veterans in highly rural
areas have the most access to these
transportation services as feasible,
regardless of their ability to pay.
17.703
Eligibility and Application
Proposed § 17.703 would address
grant eligibility and application
procedures. Proposed paragraphs (a)(1)–
(2) establish that the only entities
eligible to receive grants are either
Veterans Service Organizations, or State
veterans service agencies, to comply
with paragraphs (a)(2)(A)–(B) of section
307 of the Act. Proposed paragraph (b)
would require applicants to submit a
complete grant application package to
be considered for an initial grant, and
would specify that the initial grant
application procedures to be followed
are described in the Notice of Fund
Availability. Proposed paragraph (c)
would require applicants to submit a
complete renewal grant application
package to be considered for a renewal
grant, if the grantee’s program would
remain substantially the same, and
would specify that the renewal grant
application procedures to be followed
would be described in the Notice of
Fund Availability. By allowing grantees
to submit a renewal grant application,
additional grant funds could be sought
for subsequent fiscal years with little or
no interruption in the provision of
transportation services.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
17.705 Application Scoring Criteria
and Selection
Proposed § 17.705 would establish
scoring and selection categories for the
award of grants in accordance with the
mandate in paragraph (b)(1) of section
307 of the 2010 Act, which requires that
VA prescribe regulations to evaluate
grant applications. Proposed paragraphs
(a)(1)–(4) would specify the scoring
criteria for initial grant applications.
These proposed criteria are weighted
according to their probability of
influencing an applicant’s development
of a successful program, as well as
meeting the requirement for innovation
in paragraph (a)(1) of section 307 of the
2010 Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
The most significant criterion is
proposed paragraph (a)(1), which would
require the application to have a clearly
defined plan for successful program
implementation demonstrated by scope,
budget, staffing, and timeframe. The
existence of basic parameters such as
these is a reliable indicator that the
program is well thought out, and likely
to be successfully implemented.
Therefore, under this scoring system,
VA would award up to 40 points using
this criterion.
In contrast, we would limit the
scoring significance of the criterion in
proposed paragraph (a)(4) related to the
innovative nature of transportation
services to be provided. VA would
award only up to 10 points based upon
this criterion. We believe this would
ensure that applicants do not focus
excessively on using new or potentially
undeveloped resources or ideas in their
programs, and are instead able to
maximize the number of veterans in
highly rural areas who would be
provided with VA medical care through
transportation services.
Proposed paragraph (b) would specify
the process VA will use to award initial
grants, where VA would score
applications using the criteria in
proposed paragraph (a) and rank
applications that receive at least the
minimum amount of total points and
points per category set forth in the
Notice of Fund Availability. VA would
then award grants for the highest ranked
applications for which funding is
available.
Proposed paragraphs (c)(1)–(3) would
specify the scoring criteria for renewal
grant applications. These proposed
criteria are similarly weighted as those
for initial grant applications, but are
specific to renewal grant applications to
assist VA in evaluating those programs
which would already be operating.
Accordingly, points would be awarded
based on a grantee’s program’s success,
cost effectiveness, and compliance with
the grant agreement and other
applicable laws and regulations.
Proposed paragraph (d) would specify
the process VA would use to award
renewal grants, where VA would score
applications using the criteria in
proposed paragraph (c) and rank
applications that receive at least the
minimum amount of total points and
points per category set forth in the
Notice of Fund Availability. VA would
then award grants for the highest ranked
applications for which funding is
available.
17.710 Notice of Fund Availability
Proposed § 17.710 would establish
that VA will publish a Notice of Funds
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Availability (NOFA) in the Federal
Register when funds are available to
award grants. Proposed paragraphs (a)–
(g) would specify that the NOFA would
identify the location for obtaining grant
applications; the date, time, and place
for submitting completed grant
applications; the estimated amount and
type of grant funding available; the
length of term for the grant award; the
minimum number of total points and
points per category that an applicant or
grantee must receive in order for a grant
to be awarded; the timeframes and
manner for payments under the grant;
and lastly would specify that the NOFA
will provide access to the list of ‘‘highly
rural areas’’ recognized by VA in which
transportation services may be
provided, and consequently those areas
in which grantees may execute their
programs. All of these criteria would
ensure that eligible entities have the
information required to apply for grants.
17.715 Grant Agreements
Proposed § 17.715 would establish
that upon a grantee being awarded a
grant, VA would draft a grant agreement
to be executed by VA and the grantee.
Upon execution, VA would obligate the
grant amount. Proposed paragraph (a)(1)
would require that a grantee agree to
operate the program in accordance with
the provisions of the grant program and
in accordance with the grant
application. Proposed paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)–(iv) would mandate the
following criteria for grant agreements
where vehicles would be procured and
used to provide transportation services:
Showing of vesting of title solely with
the grantee or with the lender of leased
vehicles; showing that adequate
insurance coverage exists; showing that
all vehicle operators are properly
licensed to operate said vehicles; and
assurance that vehicles be maintained in
safe working order in accordance with
the manufacturer’s recommendations.
We recognize that VA grants awarded to
State entities and to non-profit entities
are also governed by 38 CFR parts 43
and 49, respectively, and all applicable
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Regulations and Circulars.
Particularly, the determination of
allowable costs which may be charged
to or accounted as a part of a federally
funded project is controlled by OMB
Circular A–122, Cost Principles for NonProfit Organizations (codified at 2 CFR
part 230), and by OMB Circular A–87,
Cost Principles for State, Local, and
Indian Tribal Governments. Proposed
paragraphs (b)(i)–(ii) would specify
these additional requirements for State
veterans service agencies and for
Veterans Service Organizations.
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
17.720
Payments Under the Grant
Proposed § 17.720 would notify
grantees that information regarding the
timeframe and manner of payment of
grants would be described in the Notice
of Fund Availability.
17.725 Grantee Reporting
Requirements
Proposed § 17.725 would require
grantees to report to VA information
necessary to analyze the performance of
a grantee’s program. Proposed
paragraphs (a)(1)–(7) would specify that
all grantees must submit an annual
report with the following information:
The time expended assisting with the
provision of transportation services; the
grant funds expended assisting with the
provision of transportation services; the
number of trips completed by grantee;
the total distance covered by grantee;
the number of veterans served by
grantee; the locations serviced by
grantee; and the results of a veterans
satisfaction survey.
Proposed paragraph (b) would require
that all grantees also submit quarterly
fiscal reports identifying expenditures
of the funds which VA authorized and
obligated. Proposed paragraph (c) would
require that any changes occurring in a
grantee’s program which deviate from
the grant agreement must be reported to
VA. Review of the reports detailed in
proposed paragraphs (a)–(c) would
ensure that grant funds were being
consistently used in accordance with
the grant agreements. Proposed
paragraph (d) would allow VA to
request other information or
documentation related to a grant, in the
event that information is necessary to
fully assess the success of the program.
This would further assist VA in
determining whether grant funds were
used appropriately if any part of the
required reports as submitted by a
grantee is inadequate.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
17.730
Recovery of Funds by VA
Proposed § 17.730 would establish
that VA may recover grant funds from
a grantee under certain circumstances.
Proposed paragraph (a) would provide
that VA may recover grant funds where
the funds were not used in accordance
with the grant agreement. Proposed
paragraph (a) would also explain that
VA would issue a notice to the grantee
expressing VA’s intent to recover funds
and that VA would provide the grantee
an opportunity to respond prior to VA’s
final decision that action be taken to
recover the funds. Proposed paragraph
(b) would specify that, where VA makes
a final decision that action be taken to
recover grant funds from a grantee, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
grantee would be prohibited from
receiving further grant funds from VA.
This would help safeguard federal funds
and ensure the best use of the grants.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
proposed to be revised by this
rulemaking, would represent the
exclusive legal authority on this subject.
No contrary rules or procedures would
be authorized. All VA guidance would
be read to conform with this proposed
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule includes a
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501–3521) that requires approval by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Accordingly, under section
3507(d) of the Act, VA has submitted a
copy of this rulemaking to OMB for
review. OMB assigns a control number
for each collection of information it
approves. Except for emergency
approvals under 44 U.S.C. 3507(j), VA
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Proposed §§ 17.703 and 17.725
contain collections of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501–3521). If OMB does not approve
the collections of information as
requested, VA will immediately remove
the provisions containing a collection of
information or take such other action as
is directed by OMB.
Comments on the collection of
information contained in this proposed
rule should be submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attention:
Desk Officer for the Department of
Veterans Affairs, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies sent by mail or hand
delivery to: Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management
(02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Room
1068, Washington, DC 20420; fax to
(202) 273–9026; or through
www.Regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AO01, Grants
for Transportation of Veterans in Highly
Rural Areas.’’
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collections of
information contained in this proposed
rule between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
to OMB is best assured of having its full
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
82215
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on
the proposed rule.
VA considers comments by the public
on proposed collections of information
in—
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of VA, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of VA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
The proposed amendments to title 38
CFR part 17 contain collections of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act for which we are
requesting approval by OMB. These
collections of information are described
immediately following this paragraph,
under their respective titles.
Title: Grants for Transportation of
Veterans in Highly Rural Areas.
Summary of collections of
information: The proposed rule at
proposed § 17.703(b) contains
application provisions for initial grants,
and at proposed § 17.703(c) application
provisions for renewal grants. The
proposed rule at proposed § 17.725(a)–
(b) contains requirements that each
grantee submit to VA annual and
quarterly reports; the annual reports
would include veteran satisfaction
survey results. These veteran
satisfaction surveys would be
collections by grantees from
participants.
Grant Applications
Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed
to award initial grants and to award
renewal grants to eligible entities.
Description of likely respondents:
Veterans Service Organizations and
State veterans service agencies.
Estimated number of respondents per
year: Initial Grants 100. Renewal Grants
50.
Estimated frequency of responses per
year: Initial Grants 1. Renewal Grants 1
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
82216
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 3000 hours.
Estimated annual burden per
response: Initial Grant 25 hours.
Renewal Grants 10 hours.
Annual Reports
Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed
to determine compliance with the
requirements for a grant.
Description of likely respondents:
Veterans Service Organizations and
State veterans service agencies.
Estimated number of respondents per
year: 150.
Estimated frequency of responses per
year: 1.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 300 hours.
Estimated annual burden per
response: 2 hours.
Quarterly Fiscal Reports
Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed
to determine compliance with the
requirements for a grant.
Description of likely respondents:
Veterans Service Organizations and
State Veterans Service Agencies.
Estimated number of respondents per
year: 150.
Estimated frequency of responses per
year: 4.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 300 hours.
Estimated annual burden per
response: 30 minutes.
Participant Satisfaction Surveys
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed
for VA to evaluate grantees’
performance and participants’
satisfaction with the transportation
services they receive.
Description of likely respondents:
Veterans living in highly rural areas.
Estimated number of respondents per
year: 7,500.
Estimated frequency of responses per
year: 1.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 1875 hours.
Estimated annual burden per
response: 15 minutes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. We do
not believe that many small entities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
such as independently owned taxi cab
services or other small transportation
businesses frequently or routinely
access highly rural areas as defined in
the rule, or that such access is often for
the express purpose of transporting
veterans to VA medical centers or
transporting veterans in connection
with receiving VA medical care. We
believe that veterans in these highly
rural areas who must pay for
transportation services to receive
medical care would seek more
conveniently located non-VA care,
versus VA care that may require
traveling greater distances. There would
be no economic impact on any of the
eligible entities, as they are not required
to provide matching funds to obtain the
maximum grant allowance as stated in
section 307 of the Act. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
proposed amendment is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before developing any
rule that may result in the expenditure
by State, local, or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any given year. This
rule would have no such effect on State,
local, or tribal governments, or on the
private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles are
64.009 Veterans Medical Care Benefits,
and 64.024 VA Homeless Providers
Grant and Per Diem Program.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on December 23, 2011, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs—health,
Grant programs—veterans, Health care,
Health facilities, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Travel and
transportation expenses, Veterans.
Dated: December 23, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as stated in
specific sections.
2. Amend part 17 by adding an
undesignated center heading ‘‘Grants for
Transportation of Veterans in Highly
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Rural Areas’’ and §§ 17.700 through
17.730 to read as follows:
Grants for Transportation of Veterans
in Highly Rural Areas
Sec.
17.700
17.701
17.702
17.703
17.705
17.710
17.715
17.720
17.725
17.730
Purpose and scope.
Definitions.
Grants—general.
Eligibility and application.
Scoring criteria and selection.
Notice of Fund Availability.
Grant agreements.
Payments under the grant.
Grantee reporting requirements.
Recovery of funds by VA.
Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501,
and as noted in specific sections)
§ 17.700
Purpose and scope.
This section establishes the Grants for
Veterans Service Organizations for
Transportation of Veterans in Highly
Rural Areas program. Under this
program, the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) provides grants to eligible
entities to assist veterans in highly rural
areas through innovative transportation
services to travel to VA medical centers,
and to otherwise assist in providing
transportation services in connection
with the provision of VA medical care
to these veterans.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 17.701
Definitions.
For the purposes of this section and
any Notice of Fund Availability issued
pursuant to this section:
Applicant means an eligible entity
that submits an application for a grant
announced in a Notice of Fund
Availability.
Eligible entity means:
(1) Veterans Service Organizations, or
(2) State veterans service agencies.
Grantee means an applicant that is
awarded a grant under this section.
Highly rural area means an area
consisting of a county or counties
having a population of less than seven
persons per square mile.
Notice of Fund Availability means a
Notice of Fund Availability published
in the Federal Register in accordance
with § 17.710.
Participant means a veteran in a
highly rural area who is receiving
transportation services from a grantee.
State veterans service agency means
the element of a State government that
has responsibility for programs and
activities of that government relating to
veterans benefits.
The provision of VA medical care
means the provision of medical services
as defined in section 1710 of title 38
United States Code.
Transportation services means the
direct provision of transportation, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
assistance with providing
transportation, to travel to VA medical
centers and otherwise to travel in
connection with the provision of VA
medical care.
Veterans Service Organization means
an organization recognized by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the
representation of veterans under section
5902 of title 38 United States Code.
82217
will be sufficient to completely
implement the program.
(iii) Program staffing plan is defined,
and applicant has indicated that there
will be adequate staffing for delivery of
transportation services according to the
program’s scope.
(iv) Program timeframe for
implementation is defined, and
applicant has indicated that the delivery
of transportation services will be timely.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
(2) VA will award up to 30 points
§ 17.702 Grants—general.
based on the program’s evaluation plan,
as demonstrated by the following:
(a) One grant per highly rural area.
(i) Measurable goals for determining
VA may award one grant per fiscal year
to a grantee for each highly rural area in the success of delivery of transportation
services.
which the grantee provides
(ii) Ongoing assessment of paragraph
transportation services. Transportation
(a)(2)(i) of this section, with a means of
services may not be simultaneously
adjusting the program as required.
provided by more than one grantee in
(3) VA will award up to 20 points
any single highly rural area.
(b) Maximum amount. Grant amounts based on the applicant’s community
relationships in the areas to receive
will be specified in the Notice of
transportation services, as demonstrated
Funding Availability, but no grant will
by the following:
exceed $50,000.
(i) Applicant has existing
(c) No matching requirement. A
relationships with state or local agencies
grantee will not be required to provide
or private entities, or will develop such
matching funds as a condition of
relationships, and has shown these
receiving such grant.
relationships will enhance the
(d) Veterans will not be charged.
program’s effectiveness.
Transportation services provided to
(ii) Applicant has established past
veterans through utilization of a grant
working relationships with state or local
will be free of charge.
agencies or private entities which have
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
provided transportation services similar
to those offered by the program.
§ 17.703 Eligibility and application.
(4) VA will award up to 10 points
(a) Eligible entity. The following may
based on the innovative aspects of the
be awarded a grant:
program, as demonstrated by the
(1) Veterans Service Organizations.
following:
(2) State veterans service agencies.
(b) Initial Application: To apply for an
(i) How program will identify and
initial grant, an applicant must submit
serve veterans who otherwise would be
to VA a complete grant application
unable to obtain VA medical care
package, as described in the Notice of
through conventional transportation
Fund Availability.
resources.
(c) Renewal application. Grantees may
(ii) How program will use new or
apply for one renewal grant per fiscal
alternative transportation resources.
year, after receiving an initial grant, if
(b) Initial grant selection. VA will use
the grantee’s program will remain
the following process to award initial
substantially the same. The grantee
grants:
(1) VA will rank those applications
must submit to VA a complete renewal
application as described in the Notice of that receive at least the minimum
amount of total points and points per
Fund Availability.
category set forth in the Notice of Fund
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Availability. The applications will be
§ 17.705 Scoring criteria and selection.
ranked in order from highest to lowest
scores.
(a) Initial grant scoring. Applications
(2) VA will use the applications’
will be scored using the following
ranking as the basis for awarding grants.
selection criteria:
VA will award grants for the highest
(1) VA will award up to 40 points
ranked applications for which funding
based on the program’s plan for
is available.
successful implementation, as
(c) Renewal grant scoring. Renewal
demonstrated by the following:
applications will be scored using the
(i) Program scope is defined, and
following selection criteria:
applicant has specifically indicated the
(1) VA will award up to 55 points
mode(s) or method(s) of transportation
based on the success of the grantee’s
services to be provided.
(ii) Program budget is defined, and
program, as demonstrated by the
applicant has indicated that grant funds following:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
82218
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(i) Application shows that the grantee
provided transportation services which
allowed participants to be provided
medical care timely and as scheduled.
(ii) Application shows that
participants were satisfied with the
transportation services provided by the
grantee, as described in the Notice of
Fund Availability.
(2) VA will award up to 35 points
based on the cost effectiveness of the
program, as demonstrated by the
following:
(i) The grantee administered the
program on budget.
(ii) Grant funds were utilized in a
sensible manner, as interpreted by
information provided by the grantee to
VA under § 17.725(a)(1)–(7).
(3) VA will award up to 15 points
based on the extent to which the
program complied with:
(i) The grant agreement.
(ii) Applicable laws and regulations.
(d) Renewal Grant Selection. VA will
use the following process to award
renewal grants:
(1) VA will rank those applications
that receive at least the minimum
amount of total points and points per
category set forth in the Notice of Fund
Availability. The applications will be
ranked in order from highest to lowest
scores.
(2) VA will use the applications’
ranking as the basis for awarding grants.
VA will award grants for the highest
ranked applications for which funding
is available.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 17.710
Notice of Fund Availability.
When funds are available for grants,
VA will publish a Notice of Fund
Availability in the Federal Register. The
notice will identify:
(a) The location for obtaining grant
applications;
(b) The date, time, and place for
submitting completed grant
applications;
(c) The estimated amount and type of
grant funding available;
(d) The length of term for the grant
award;
(e) The minimum number of total
points and points per category that an
applicant or grantee must receive in
order for a supportive grant to be
funded;
(f) The timeframes and manner for
payments under the grant; and
(g) Those areas identified by VA to be
the ‘‘highly rural areas’’ in which
grantees may provide transportation
services funded under this rule.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
§ 17.715
Grant agreements.
(a) General. After a grantee is awarded
a grant in accordance with § 17.705(b) or
§ 17.705(d), VA will draft a grant
agreement to be executed by VA and the
grantee. Upon execution of the grant
agreement, VA will obligate the
approved amount to the grantee. The
grant agreement will provide that the
grantee agrees to:
(1) Operate the program in accordance
with the provisions of this section and
the grant application.
(2) Procurement and operation of
vehicles. Where a grant agreement
outlines a program where funds will be
used to procure or operate vehicles to
directly provide transportation services,
the grant agreement must detail the
following:
(i) Title to the vehicles must vest
solely in the grantee, or with leased
vehicles in an identified lender.
(ii) The grantee shall, at a minimum,
provide motor vehicle liability
insurance for the vehicles to the same
extent they would insure vehicles
procured with their own funds.
(iii) All vehicle operators must be
licensed in a U.S. State or Territory to
operate such vehicles.
(iv) Vehicles will be safe and
maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer’s recommendations.
(b) Additional requirements. Grantees
are subject to the following additional
requirements:
(i) State veterans service agencies are
subject to the Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments under 38 CFR part
43, as well as to OMB Circular A–87,
Cost Principles for State, Local, and
Indian Tribal Governments, and 2 CFR
parts 25 and 170, if applicable.
(ii) Veterans Service Organizations are
subject to the Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements With Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and Other NonProfit Organizations under 38 CFR part
49, as well as to OMB Circular A–122,
Cost Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations, codified at 2 CFR part
230, and 2 CFR parts 25 and 170, if
applicable.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
§ 17.720
Payments under the grant.
grant must submit to VA an annual
report which indicates the following
information:
(1) Record of time expended assisting
with the provision of transportation
services.
(2) Record of grant funds expended
assisting with the provision of
transportation services.
(3) Trips completed.
(4) Total distance covered.
(5) Veterans served.
(6) Locations which received
transportation services.
(7) Results of veteran satisfaction
survey.
(b) Quarterly fiscal report. All
grantees who receive either an initial or
renewal grant must submit to VA a
quarterly report which identifies the
expenditures of the funds which VA
authorized and obligated.
(c) Program variations. Any changes
in a grantee’s program activities which
result in deviations from the grant
agreement must be reported to VA.
(d) Additional reporting requirements
may be requested by VA to allow VA to
fully assess program effectiveness.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
§ 17.730
Recovery of funds by VA.
(a) Recovery of funds. VA may recover
from the grantee any funds that are not
used in accordance with a grant
agreement. If VA decides to recover
funds, VA will issue to the grantee a
notice of intent to recover grant funds,
and grantee will then have 30 days to
submit documentation demonstrating
why the grant funds should not be
recovered. After review of all submitted
documentation, VA will determine
whether action will be taken to recover
the grant funds.
(b) Prohibition of Further Grants.
When VA determines action will be
taken to recover grant funds from the
grantee, the grantee is then prohibited
from receipt of any further grant funds.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
[FR Doc. 2011–33435 Filed 12–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
Grantees are to be paid in accordance
with the timeframes and manner set
forth in the Notice of Fund Availability.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111–163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
§ 17.725
Grantee reporting requirements.
(a) Annual report. All grantees who
receive either an initial or renewed
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 251 (Friday, December 30, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 82212-82218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33435]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AO01
Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations in part 17 to establish a new program to provide grants to
eligible entities to assist veterans in highly rural areas through
innovative transportation services to travel to VA medical centers, and
to otherwise assist in providing transportation services in connection
with the provision of VA medical care to these veterans. This
rulemaking is necessary to implement new statutory authority by
establishing procedures for evaluating grant applications under the new
grant program, and otherwise administering the new grant program. This
proposed rule would implement section 307 of title III of the
Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010 (the 2010
Act).
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before February 28, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand delivery to the Director,
Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by
fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ``RIN 2900-AO01, Grants for Transportation of Veterans
in Highly Rural Areas.'' Copies of comments received will be available
for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902
(this is not a toll-free number) for an appointment. In addition,
during the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the
Federal Docket Management System at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Riley, Director, Veterans
Transportation Service, Chief Business Office (10NB), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2957 Clairmont Road,
Atlanta, GA 30329, (404) 828-5601. (This is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 307 of the 2010 Act, requires that
VA ``establish a grant program to provide innovative transportation
options to veterans in highly rural areas.'' To comply with section 307
of the 2010 Act, VA will award grants to eligible entities to assist
veterans in highly rural areas to travel to VA medical centers, and to
otherwise assist in providing transportation in connection with the
provision of VA medical care to these veterans. This proposed rule
would establish the grant program in accordance with paragraph (a) of
section 307 of the 2010 Act, and establish regulations for evaluating
grant applications and otherwise administering the grant program in
accordance with paragraph (b) of section 307 of the 2010 Act.
Section 307(d) of the 2010 Act authorizes $3,000,000 of
appropriated funds for each fiscal year beginning 2010 through 2014 to
carry out the grant program. We would indicate this funding limitation
for each of the fiscal years in a Notice of Fund Availability (NOFA)
publication in the Federal Register, to adequately provide notice to
eligible recipients of the grants. It is not necessary to include the
funding limitation or to indicate the specific fiscal years for the
program's funding in the proposed rule, however, because the amount of
authorized appropriations may change after fiscal year 2014 and
Congress could extend the program past fiscal year 2014. Section 307 of
the 2010 Act is not designated by Congress to be a pilot program, and
the law does not otherwise contain a provision that it will cease to
have effect after a specific date unless extended. By not including the
funding limitation or the specific fiscal years the program is to be
funded in the proposed rule, we would prevent having a regulation in
the Code of Federal Regulations that appeared to restrict or stop the
grant program beyond a certain date, when VA may still be compelled to
administer the grant program. If funding ceases to be provided or the
grant program is not extended beyond 2014, we would not
[[Page 82213]]
publish a subsequent NOFA in the Federal Register for that following
fiscal year, and we would amend our regulations to remove the rule from
the Code of Federal Regulations.
17.700 Purpose and Scope
Proposed Sec. 17.700 would establish the grant program and explain
what the program provides. This section would indicate that VA would
provide grants to eligible entities to assist veterans in highly rural
areas to travel to VA medical centers and to otherwise assist in
providing transportation in connection with the provision of VA medical
care to such veterans, in accordance with paragraph (a) of section 307
of the Act.
17.701 Definitions
Proposed Sec. 17.701 would define terms to be used throughout all
proposed sections, and in Notices of Fund Availability to be published
in the Federal Register. ``Applicant'' would be defined as an eligible
entity that submits an application for a grant announced in a Notice of
Fund Availability. An ``eligible entity'' would be defined as either
Veterans Service Organizations, or State veterans service agencies, in
accordance with paragraphs (a)(2)(A)-(B) of section 307 of the 2010
Act. A ``grantee'' would be defined as an applicant that is awarded a
grant under this proposed rule. A ``highly rural area'' would be
defined as an area consisting of a county or counties having a
population of less than seven persons per square mile, consistent with
paragraph (c)(1) of section 307 of the 2010 Act. VA currently monitors
and maintains a specific listing of such highly rural areas, and grants
will only be awarded to applicants whose programs will service one or
more of these areas, as identified in the application. VA will provide
the listing of specific highly rural areas in the Notice of Fund
Availability for the proposed rule. A ``Notice of Fund Availability''
would be defined as a Notice of Fund Availability published in the
Federal Register in accordance with Sec. 17.710 of the proposed rule.
A ``participant'' would be defined as a veteran in a highly rural area
who receives transportation services from a grantee. A ``State veterans
service agency'' would be defined as the element of a State government
that has responsibility for programs and activities of that government
relating to veterans benefits, for instance the ``Maryland Department
of Veterans Affairs.'' We do not interpret section 307 of the 2010 Act
as permitting VA to consider cities or counties to be ``State veterans
service agencies'' for purposes of this proposed rule, as we read the
plain language of the statute to authorize only a State level entity to
be a grantee within the meaning of this definition. By definition, VA
would not limit these entities to include only those which are formally
recognized by VA under 38 U.S.C. 5902, though VA in practice does
recognize under section 5902 veterans service agencies for 46 States.
We believe this ensures that there is the same regulatory distinction
between the two eligible entity types as Congress intended in section
307 of the 2010 Act. This would also ensure that every State entity
which is responsible for programs and activities relating to veterans
benefits will be able to apply for grants even if not recognized by VA
under section 5902. For instance, Alaska and Wyoming are not among the
46 States recognized under section 5902, but each has a formal State
level entity responsible for programs and activities related to
veterans benefits, as well as identified highly rural areas that would
benefit from grants awarded under the proposed rule.
The ``provision of VA medical care'' would be defined as the
provision of medical services as defined in section 1710 of title 38
United States Code. Though paragraph (a)(3)(B) of section 307 of the
2010 Act only specifies ``the provision of medical care'' without
distinguishing that the care would be VA medical care, it is reasonable
to conclude that the intent of section 307 of the 2010 Act is that the
transportation services provided would be in connection with medical
care provided by VA. We believe this conclusion is supported by reading
paragraphs (a)(3)(A) and (B) together: Grant funds must be used to
``assist veterans in highly rural areas to travel to Department of
Veterans Affairs medical centers'' and to ``otherwise assist in
providing transportation in connection with the provision of medical
care to veterans in highly rural areas.'' We interpret the use of the
term ``otherwise'' in paragraph (a)(3)(B) to expand travel to VA
facilities other than VA medical centers for the provision of medical
care, but not to expand the type of medical care provided beyond that
provided by VA. Section 307 of the Act clearly seeks to improve access
to VA medical care for veterans in highly rural areas through
transportation assistance, and it is this assistance that negates the
need for a veteran to seek what is perhaps more conveniently located
non-VA medical care. ``Transportation services'' would be defined as
the direct provision of transportation, or assistance with providing
transportation, to travel to VA medical centers or in connection with
the provision of VA medical care. We believe section 307 of the 2010
Act supports awarding grants for programs that may not directly
transport veterans, as section 307(a)(3)(A)-(B) makes clear that an
eligible entity may use grant funds to ``assist'' veterans to travel to
care, or to otherwise ``assist'' in providing transportation in
connection with the provision of care to a veteran. For instance,
grantees may use funds to initiate ride sharing or car pooling
programs, whereby veterans could be matched with and share vehicles
with others traveling to the same destinations at the same times.
``Veterans Service Organization'' would be defined as an organization
recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the representation
of veterans under section 5902 of title 38 United States Code, in
accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of section 307 of the 2010 Act. These
organizations have multiple representative groupings which are
recognized throughout the United States. Each of these groupings would
be individually eligible to apply for a grant, to ensure grant funds
are distributed as broadly as needed.
17.702 Grants--General
Proposed Sec. 17.702 would establish the general parameters of the
grants themselves. Proposed paragraph (a) would indicate that VA may
award one grant per fiscal year to a grantee for each highly rural area
in which the grantee provides transportation services, and that
transportation services may not be simultaneously provided by more than
one grantee in any single highly rural area. We would allow a grantee
to receive a grant for each highly rural area in which the grantee
provides transportation services, to permit State entities to receive
as many grants as they have designated highly rural areas. This would
help ensure that each highly rural area receives the maximum amount of
assistance contemplated under section 307 of the 2010 Act. Designating
that grants are awarded per fiscal year would ensure that grants are
awarded only when funding is available, in accordance with paragraph
(d) of section 307 of the 2010 Act. The prohibition of simultaneous
delivery of transportation services by more than one grantee in one
area would ensure that as many geographic areas are serviced as
possible each fiscal year, by preventing a concentration of grant
awards for any single highly rural area. Proposed paragraph (b) would
establish that the grant amounts will be specified
[[Page 82214]]
in the Notice of Fund Availability, but that no single grant will
exceed $50,000, to comply with paragraph (a)(4) of section 307 of the
2010 Act. Proposed paragraph (c) would specify that an applicant would
not be required to provide matching funds as a condition of receiving a
grant, in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of section 307 of the 2010
Act. Proposed paragraph (d) would specify that a veteran who is
provided transportation services via grant funds will not be charged
for such services, to ensure that veterans in highly rural areas have
the most access to these transportation services as feasible,
regardless of their ability to pay.
17.703 Eligibility and Application
Proposed Sec. 17.703 would address grant eligibility and
application procedures. Proposed paragraphs (a)(1)-(2) establish that
the only entities eligible to receive grants are either Veterans
Service Organizations, or State veterans service agencies, to comply
with paragraphs (a)(2)(A)-(B) of section 307 of the Act. Proposed
paragraph (b) would require applicants to submit a complete grant
application package to be considered for an initial grant, and would
specify that the initial grant application procedures to be followed
are described in the Notice of Fund Availability. Proposed paragraph
(c) would require applicants to submit a complete renewal grant
application package to be considered for a renewal grant, if the
grantee's program would remain substantially the same, and would
specify that the renewal grant application procedures to be followed
would be described in the Notice of Fund Availability. By allowing
grantees to submit a renewal grant application, additional grant funds
could be sought for subsequent fiscal years with little or no
interruption in the provision of transportation services.
17.705 Application Scoring Criteria and Selection
Proposed Sec. 17.705 would establish scoring and selection
categories for the award of grants in accordance with the mandate in
paragraph (b)(1) of section 307 of the 2010 Act, which requires that VA
prescribe regulations to evaluate grant applications. Proposed
paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) would specify the scoring criteria for initial
grant applications. These proposed criteria are weighted according to
their probability of influencing an applicant's development of a
successful program, as well as meeting the requirement for innovation
in paragraph (a)(1) of section 307 of the 2010 Act.
The most significant criterion is proposed paragraph (a)(1), which
would require the application to have a clearly defined plan for
successful program implementation demonstrated by scope, budget,
staffing, and timeframe. The existence of basic parameters such as
these is a reliable indicator that the program is well thought out, and
likely to be successfully implemented. Therefore, under this scoring
system, VA would award up to 40 points using this criterion.
In contrast, we would limit the scoring significance of the
criterion in proposed paragraph (a)(4) related to the innovative nature
of transportation services to be provided. VA would award only up to 10
points based upon this criterion. We believe this would ensure that
applicants do not focus excessively on using new or potentially
undeveloped resources or ideas in their programs, and are instead able
to maximize the number of veterans in highly rural areas who would be
provided with VA medical care through transportation services.
Proposed paragraph (b) would specify the process VA will use to
award initial grants, where VA would score applications using the
criteria in proposed paragraph (a) and rank applications that receive
at least the minimum amount of total points and points per category set
forth in the Notice of Fund Availability. VA would then award grants
for the highest ranked applications for which funding is available.
Proposed paragraphs (c)(1)-(3) would specify the scoring criteria
for renewal grant applications. These proposed criteria are similarly
weighted as those for initial grant applications, but are specific to
renewal grant applications to assist VA in evaluating those programs
which would already be operating. Accordingly, points would be awarded
based on a grantee's program's success, cost effectiveness, and
compliance with the grant agreement and other applicable laws and
regulations.
Proposed paragraph (d) would specify the process VA would use to
award renewal grants, where VA would score applications using the
criteria in proposed paragraph (c) and rank applications that receive
at least the minimum amount of total points and points per category set
forth in the Notice of Fund Availability. VA would then award grants
for the highest ranked applications for which funding is available.
17.710 Notice of Fund Availability
Proposed Sec. 17.710 would establish that VA will publish a Notice
of Funds Availability (NOFA) in the Federal Register when funds are
available to award grants. Proposed paragraphs (a)-(g) would specify
that the NOFA would identify the location for obtaining grant
applications; the date, time, and place for submitting completed grant
applications; the estimated amount and type of grant funding available;
the length of term for the grant award; the minimum number of total
points and points per category that an applicant or grantee must
receive in order for a grant to be awarded; the timeframes and manner
for payments under the grant; and lastly would specify that the NOFA
will provide access to the list of ``highly rural areas'' recognized by
VA in which transportation services may be provided, and consequently
those areas in which grantees may execute their programs. All of these
criteria would ensure that eligible entities have the information
required to apply for grants.
17.715 Grant Agreements
Proposed Sec. 17.715 would establish that upon a grantee being
awarded a grant, VA would draft a grant agreement to be executed by VA
and the grantee. Upon execution, VA would obligate the grant amount.
Proposed paragraph (a)(1) would require that a grantee agree to operate
the program in accordance with the provisions of the grant program and
in accordance with the grant application. Proposed paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)-(iv) would mandate the following criteria for grant
agreements where vehicles would be procured and used to provide
transportation services: Showing of vesting of title solely with the
grantee or with the lender of leased vehicles; showing that adequate
insurance coverage exists; showing that all vehicle operators are
properly licensed to operate said vehicles; and assurance that vehicles
be maintained in safe working order in accordance with the
manufacturer's recommendations. We recognize that VA grants awarded to
State entities and to non-profit entities are also governed by 38 CFR
parts 43 and 49, respectively, and all applicable Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Regulations and Circulars. Particularly, the
determination of allowable costs which may be charged to or accounted
as a part of a federally funded project is controlled by OMB Circular
A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations (codified at 2 CFR
part 230), and by OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local,
and Indian Tribal Governments. Proposed paragraphs (b)(i)-(ii) would
specify these additional requirements for State veterans service
agencies and for Veterans Service Organizations.
[[Page 82215]]
17.720 Payments Under the Grant
Proposed Sec. 17.720 would notify grantees that information
regarding the timeframe and manner of payment of grants would be
described in the Notice of Fund Availability.
17.725 Grantee Reporting Requirements
Proposed Sec. 17.725 would require grantees to report to VA
information necessary to analyze the performance of a grantee's
program. Proposed paragraphs (a)(1)-(7) would specify that all grantees
must submit an annual report with the following information: The time
expended assisting with the provision of transportation services; the
grant funds expended assisting with the provision of transportation
services; the number of trips completed by grantee; the total distance
covered by grantee; the number of veterans served by grantee; the
locations serviced by grantee; and the results of a veterans
satisfaction survey.
Proposed paragraph (b) would require that all grantees also submit
quarterly fiscal reports identifying expenditures of the funds which VA
authorized and obligated. Proposed paragraph (c) would require that any
changes occurring in a grantee's program which deviate from the grant
agreement must be reported to VA. Review of the reports detailed in
proposed paragraphs (a)-(c) would ensure that grant funds were being
consistently used in accordance with the grant agreements. Proposed
paragraph (d) would allow VA to request other information or
documentation related to a grant, in the event that information is
necessary to fully assess the success of the program. This would
further assist VA in determining whether grant funds were used
appropriately if any part of the required reports as submitted by a
grantee is inadequate.
17.730 Recovery of Funds by VA
Proposed Sec. 17.730 would establish that VA may recover grant
funds from a grantee under certain circumstances. Proposed paragraph
(a) would provide that VA may recover grant funds where the funds were
not used in accordance with the grant agreement. Proposed paragraph (a)
would also explain that VA would issue a notice to the grantee
expressing VA's intent to recover funds and that VA would provide the
grantee an opportunity to respond prior to VA's final decision that
action be taken to recover the funds. Proposed paragraph (b) would
specify that, where VA makes a final decision that action be taken to
recover grant funds from a grantee, the grantee would be prohibited
from receiving further grant funds from VA. This would help safeguard
federal funds and ensure the best use of the grants.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as proposed to be revised by this
rulemaking, would represent the exclusive legal authority on this
subject. No contrary rules or procedures would be authorized. All VA
guidance would be read to conform with this proposed rulemaking if
possible or, if not possible, such guidance would be superseded by this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule includes a collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) that requires approval by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Accordingly, under section
3507(d) of the Act, VA has submitted a copy of this rulemaking to OMB
for review. OMB assigns a control number for each collection of
information it approves. Except for emergency approvals under 44 U.S.C.
3507(j), VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. Proposed Sec. Sec. 17.703 and 17.725 contain
collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521). If OMB does not approve the collections of information as
requested, VA will immediately remove the provisions containing a
collection of information or take such other action as is directed by
OMB.
Comments on the collection of information contained in this
proposed rule should be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of Veterans Affairs,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503,
with copies sent by mail or hand delivery to: Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; fax to
(202) 273-9026; or through www.Regulations.gov. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AO01, Grants
for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas.''
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collections of
information contained in this proposed rule between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore,
a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on the proposed rule.
VA considers comments by the public on proposed collections of
information in--
Evaluating whether the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of VA,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluating the accuracy of VA's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collections of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The proposed amendments to title 38 CFR part 17 contain collections
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act for which we are
requesting approval by OMB. These collections of information are
described immediately following this paragraph, under their respective
titles.
Title: Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas.
Summary of collections of information: The proposed rule at
proposed Sec. 17.703(b) contains application provisions for initial
grants, and at proposed Sec. 17.703(c) application provisions for
renewal grants. The proposed rule at proposed Sec. 17.725(a)-(b)
contains requirements that each grantee submit to VA annual and
quarterly reports; the annual reports would include veteran
satisfaction survey results. These veteran satisfaction surveys would
be collections by grantees from participants.
Grant Applications
Description of the need for information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed to award initial grants and to
award renewal grants to eligible entities.
Description of likely respondents: Veterans Service Organizations
and State veterans service agencies.
Estimated number of respondents per year: Initial Grants 100.
Renewal Grants 50.
Estimated frequency of responses per year: Initial Grants 1.
Renewal Grants 1
[[Page 82216]]
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 3000
hours.
Estimated annual burden per response: Initial Grant 25 hours.
Renewal Grants 10 hours.
Annual Reports
Description of the need for information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed to determine compliance with
the requirements for a grant.
Description of likely respondents: Veterans Service Organizations
and State veterans service agencies.
Estimated number of respondents per year: 150.
Estimated frequency of responses per year: 1.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 300
hours.
Estimated annual burden per response: 2 hours.
Quarterly Fiscal Reports
Description of the need for information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed to determine compliance with
the requirements for a grant.
Description of likely respondents: Veterans Service Organizations
and State Veterans Service Agencies.
Estimated number of respondents per year: 150.
Estimated frequency of responses per year: 4.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 300
hours.
Estimated annual burden per response: 30 minutes.
Participant Satisfaction Surveys
Description of the need for information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed for VA to evaluate grantees'
performance and participants' satisfaction with the transportation
services they receive.
Description of likely respondents: Veterans living in highly rural
areas.
Estimated number of respondents per year: 7,500.
Estimated frequency of responses per year: 1.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 1875
hours.
Estimated annual burden per response: 15 minutes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. We do not believe that many small entities such as
independently owned taxi cab services or other small transportation
businesses frequently or routinely access highly rural areas as defined
in the rule, or that such access is often for the express purpose of
transporting veterans to VA medical centers or transporting veterans in
connection with receiving VA medical care. We believe that veterans in
these highly rural areas who must pay for transportation services to
receive medical care would seek more conveniently located non-VA care,
versus VA care that may require traveling greater distances. There
would be no economic impact on any of the eligible entities, as they
are not required to provide matching funds to obtain the maximum grant
allowance as stated in section 307 of the Act. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed amendment is exempt from the initial and
final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and
604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as ``any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
developing any rule that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any given
year. This rule would have no such effect on State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles are
64.009 Veterans Medical Care Benefits, and 64.024 VA Homeless Providers
Grant and Per Diem Program.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on December 23, 2011, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs--health,
Grant programs--veterans, Health care, Health facilities, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Travel and transportation expenses,
Veterans.
Dated: December 23, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR
part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as stated in specific sections.
2. Amend part 17 by adding an undesignated center heading ``Grants
for Transportation of Veterans in Highly
[[Page 82217]]
Rural Areas'' and Sec. Sec. 17.700 through 17.730 to read as follows:
Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas
Sec.
17.700 Purpose and scope.
17.701 Definitions.
17.702 Grants--general.
17.703 Eligibility and application.
17.705 Scoring criteria and selection.
17.710 Notice of Fund Availability.
17.715 Grant agreements.
17.720 Payments under the grant.
17.725 Grantee reporting requirements.
17.730 Recovery of funds by VA.
Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections)
Sec. 17.700 Purpose and scope.
This section establishes the Grants for Veterans Service
Organizations for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas
program. Under this program, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
provides grants to eligible entities to assist veterans in highly rural
areas through innovative transportation services to travel to VA
medical centers, and to otherwise assist in providing transportation
services in connection with the provision of VA medical care to these
veterans.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.701 Definitions.
For the purposes of this section and any Notice of Fund
Availability issued pursuant to this section:
Applicant means an eligible entity that submits an application for
a grant announced in a Notice of Fund Availability.
Eligible entity means:
(1) Veterans Service Organizations, or
(2) State veterans service agencies.
Grantee means an applicant that is awarded a grant under this
section.
Highly rural area means an area consisting of a county or counties
having a population of less than seven persons per square mile.
Notice of Fund Availability means a Notice of Fund Availability
published in the Federal Register in accordance with Sec. 17.710.
Participant means a veteran in a highly rural area who is receiving
transportation services from a grantee.
State veterans service agency means the element of a State
government that has responsibility for programs and activities of that
government relating to veterans benefits.
The provision of VA medical care means the provision of medical
services as defined in section 1710 of title 38 United States Code.
Transportation services means the direct provision of
transportation, or assistance with providing transportation, to travel
to VA medical centers and otherwise to travel in connection with the
provision of VA medical care.
Veterans Service Organization means an organization recognized by
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the representation of veterans
under section 5902 of title 38 United States Code.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.702 Grants--general.
(a) One grant per highly rural area. VA may award one grant per
fiscal year to a grantee for each highly rural area in which the
grantee provides transportation services. Transportation services may
not be simultaneously provided by more than one grantee in any single
highly rural area.
(b) Maximum amount. Grant amounts will be specified in the Notice
of Funding Availability, but no grant will exceed $50,000.
(c) No matching requirement. A grantee will not be required to
provide matching funds as a condition of receiving such grant.
(d) Veterans will not be charged. Transportation services provided
to veterans through utilization of a grant will be free of charge.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.703 Eligibility and application.
(a) Eligible entity. The following may be awarded a grant:
(1) Veterans Service Organizations.
(2) State veterans service agencies.
(b) Initial Application: To apply for an initial grant, an
applicant must submit to VA a complete grant application package, as
described in the Notice of Fund Availability.
(c) Renewal application. Grantees may apply for one renewal grant
per fiscal year, after receiving an initial grant, if the grantee's
program will remain substantially the same. The grantee must submit to
VA a complete renewal application as described in the Notice of Fund
Availability.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.705 Scoring criteria and selection.
(a) Initial grant scoring. Applications will be scored using the
following selection criteria:
(1) VA will award up to 40 points based on the program's plan for
successful implementation, as demonstrated by the following:
(i) Program scope is defined, and applicant has specifically
indicated the mode(s) or method(s) of transportation services to be
provided.
(ii) Program budget is defined, and applicant has indicated that
grant funds will be sufficient to completely implement the program.
(iii) Program staffing plan is defined, and applicant has indicated
that there will be adequate staffing for delivery of transportation
services according to the program's scope.
(iv) Program timeframe for implementation is defined, and applicant
has indicated that the delivery of transportation services will be
timely.
(2) VA will award up to 30 points based on the program's evaluation
plan, as demonstrated by the following:
(i) Measurable goals for determining the success of delivery of
transportation services.
(ii) Ongoing assessment of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section,
with a means of adjusting the program as required.
(3) VA will award up to 20 points based on the applicant's
community relationships in the areas to receive transportation
services, as demonstrated by the following:
(i) Applicant has existing relationships with state or local
agencies or private entities, or will develop such relationships, and
has shown these relationships will enhance the program's effectiveness.
(ii) Applicant has established past working relationships with
state or local agencies or private entities which have provided
transportation services similar to those offered by the program.
(4) VA will award up to 10 points based on the innovative aspects
of the program, as demonstrated by the following:
(i) How program will identify and serve veterans who otherwise
would be unable to obtain VA medical care through conventional
transportation resources.
(ii) How program will use new or alternative transportation
resources.
(b) Initial grant selection. VA will use the following process to
award initial grants:
(1) VA will rank those applications that receive at least the
minimum amount of total points and points per category set forth in the
Notice of Fund Availability. The applications will be ranked in order
from highest to lowest scores.
(2) VA will use the applications' ranking as the basis for awarding
grants. VA will award grants for the highest ranked applications for
which funding is available.
(c) Renewal grant scoring. Renewal applications will be scored
using the following selection criteria:
(1) VA will award up to 55 points based on the success of the
grantee's program, as demonstrated by the following:
[[Page 82218]]
(i) Application shows that the grantee provided transportation
services which allowed participants to be provided medical care timely
and as scheduled.
(ii) Application shows that participants were satisfied with the
transportation services provided by the grantee, as described in the
Notice of Fund Availability.
(2) VA will award up to 35 points based on the cost effectiveness
of the program, as demonstrated by the following:
(i) The grantee administered the program on budget.
(ii) Grant funds were utilized in a sensible manner, as interpreted
by information provided by the grantee to VA under Sec. 17.725(a)(1)-
(7).
(3) VA will award up to 15 points based on the extent to which the
program complied with:
(i) The grant agreement.
(ii) Applicable laws and regulations.
(d) Renewal Grant Selection. VA will use the following process to
award renewal grants:
(1) VA will rank those applications that receive at least the
minimum amount of total points and points per category set forth in the
Notice of Fund Availability. The applications will be ranked in order
from highest to lowest scores.
(2) VA will use the applications' ranking as the basis for awarding
grants. VA will award grants for the highest ranked applications for
which funding is available.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.710 Notice of Fund Availability.
When funds are available for grants, VA will publish a Notice of
Fund Availability in the Federal Register. The notice will identify:
(a) The location for obtaining grant applications;
(b) The date, time, and place for submitting completed grant
applications;
(c) The estimated amount and type of grant funding available;
(d) The length of term for the grant award;
(e) The minimum number of total points and points per category that
an applicant or grantee must receive in order for a supportive grant to
be funded;
(f) The timeframes and manner for payments under the grant; and
(g) Those areas identified by VA to be the ``highly rural areas''
in which grantees may provide transportation services funded under this
rule.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.715 Grant agreements.
(a) General. After a grantee is awarded a grant in accordance with
Sec. 17.705(b) or Sec. 17.705(d), VA will draft a grant agreement to
be executed by VA and the grantee. Upon execution of the grant
agreement, VA will obligate the approved amount to the grantee. The
grant agreement will provide that the grantee agrees to:
(1) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of this
section and the grant application.
(2) Procurement and operation of vehicles. Where a grant agreement
outlines a program where funds will be used to procure or operate
vehicles to directly provide transportation services, the grant
agreement must detail the following:
(i) Title to the vehicles must vest solely in the grantee, or with
leased vehicles in an identified lender.
(ii) The grantee shall, at a minimum, provide motor vehicle
liability insurance for the vehicles to the same extent they would
insure vehicles procured with their own funds.
(iii) All vehicle operators must be licensed in a U.S. State or
Territory to operate such vehicles.
(iv) Vehicles will be safe and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer's recommendations.
(b) Additional requirements. Grantees are subject to the following
additional requirements:
(i) State veterans service agencies are subject to the Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State and Local Governments under 38 CFR part 43, as well as to OMB
Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal
Governments, and 2 CFR parts 25 and 170, if applicable.
(ii) Veterans Service Organizations are subject to the Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations
under 38 CFR part 49, as well as to OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles
for Non-Profit Organizations, codified at 2 CFR part 230, and 2 CFR
parts 25 and 170, if applicable.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.720 Payments under the grant.
Grantees are to be paid in accordance with the timeframes and
manner set forth in the Notice of Fund Availability.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.725 Grantee reporting requirements.
(a) Annual report. All grantees who receive either an initial or
renewed grant must submit to VA an annual report which indicates the
following information:
(1) Record of time expended assisting with the provision of
transportation services.
(2) Record of grant funds expended assisting with the provision of
transportation services.
(3) Trips completed.
(4) Total distance covered.
(5) Veterans served.
(6) Locations which received transportation services.
(7) Results of veteran satisfaction survey.
(b) Quarterly fiscal report. All grantees who receive either an
initial or renewal grant must submit to VA a quarterly report which
identifies the expenditures of the funds which VA authorized and
obligated.
(c) Program variations. Any changes in a grantee's program
activities which result in deviations from the grant agreement must be
reported to VA.
(d) Additional reporting requirements may be requested by VA to
allow VA to fully assess program effectiveness.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
Sec. 17.730 Recovery of funds by VA.
(a) Recovery of funds. VA may recover from the grantee any funds
that are not used in accordance with a grant agreement. If VA decides
to recover funds, VA will issue to the grantee a notice of intent to
recover grant funds, and grantee will then have 30 days to submit
documentation demonstrating why the grant funds should not be
recovered. After review of all submitted documentation, VA will
determine whether action will be taken to recover the grant funds.
(b) Prohibition of Further Grants. When VA determines action will
be taken to recover grant funds from the grantee, the grantee is then
prohibited from receipt of any further grant funds.
(Authority: Pub. L. 111-163, 38 U.S.C. 501)
[FR Doc. 2011-33435 Filed 12-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P