Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean, 82275-82277 [2011-33195]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Notices
During any administrative review
covering all or part of a period falling
between the first and second or third
and fourth anniversary of the
publication of an antidumping duty
order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a
determination under 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or
suspended investigation (after sunset
review), the Secretary, if requested by a
domestic interested party within 30
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of the review, will
determine, consistent with FAG Italia v.
United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir.
2002), as appropriate, whether
antidumping duties have been absorbed
by an exporter or producer subject to the
review if the subject merchandise is
sold in the United States through an
importer that is affiliated with such
exporter or producer. The request must
include the name(s) of the exporter or
producer for which the inquiry is
requested.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Those procedures apply to
administrative reviews included in this
notice of initiation. Parties wishing to
participate in any of these
administrative reviews should ensure
that the meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of separate
letters of appearance as discussed at 19
CFR 351.103(d)).
Any party submitting factual
information in an antidumping duty or
countervailing duty proceeding must
certify to the accuracy and completeness
of that information. See section 782(b)
of the Act. Parties are hereby reminded
that revised certification requirements
are in effect for company/government
officials as well as their representatives
in all segments of any antidumping duty
or countervailing duty proceedings
initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See
Certification of Factual Information to
deemed to be covered by this review as part of the
single PRC entity of which the named exporters are
a part.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:02 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
Import Administration During
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR
7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final
Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1)
and (2). The formats for the revised
certifications are provided at the end of
the Interim Final Rule. The Department
intends to reject factual submissions in
any proceeding segments initiated on or
after March 14, 2011 if the submitting
party does not comply with the revised
certification requirements.
These initiations and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: December 23, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–33594 Filed 12–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–938]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: December 30,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Tran, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 29, 2009 the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register the
countervailing duty order on citric acid
and certain citrate salts from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC). See
Countervailing Duty Orders and
Amendments of Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determinations:
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, 74
FR 25705 (May 29, 2009). On May 2,
2011, the Department published a notice
of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of this
countervailing duty order. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
82275
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 76 FR 24460
(May 2, 2011). In accordance with 19
CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a
notice of initiation of the administrative
review on June 28, 2011, for the January
1, 2010, through December 31, 2010,
period of review (POR). See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 37781
(June 28, 2011). The preliminary results
for this review are currently due no later
than January 31, 2012.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested. If it is not
practicable to issue the preliminary
results within 245 days, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend this deadline to a
maximum of 365 days.
Because the Department will require
additional time to review and analyze
questionnaire responses from the
Government of the People’s Republic of
China and the respondent, RZBC Co.,
Ltd., and its affiliates, and may issue
supplemental questionnaires, it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results within the original deadline (i.e.,
January 31, 2012). Therefore, the
Department is extending the time limit
for completion of the preliminary
results by 120 days to not later than May
30, 2012, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–33596 Filed 12–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA885
Notice of Availability of a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the
Arctic Ocean
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
82276
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Notices
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement;
request for comments.
NMFS announces the
availability of the ‘‘Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Effects
of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic
Ocean.’’ Publication of this notice
begins the official public comment
period for this DEIS. The purpose of the
DEIS is to evaluate, in compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the potential direct, indirect,
and cumulative impacts of
implementing the alternative
approaches for authorizing the take of
marine mammals incidental to oil and
gas exploration activities in the Arctic
Ocean pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The U.S.
Department of the Interior’s Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is a
cooperating agency on this DEIS, and as
such, this DEIS also evaluates the
potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts of implementing the
alternative approaches for authorizing
geological and geophysical (G&G)
surveys and ancillary activities under
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
(OCSLA) in the Arctic Ocean. The North
Slope Borough (NSB) is also a
cooperating agency on this DEIS.
DATES: All comments and written
statements must be received no later
than Monday, February 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
statements on the DEIS must be
postmarked by February 13, 2012.
Comments on the DEIS may be
submitted by:
• Email:
arcticeis.comments@noaa.gov.
• Mail: Office of Protected Resources,
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
• Fax: (301) 713–0376.
• Public Hearings: Oral and written
comments will be accepted during the
upcoming public hearings. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Public
Hearings (below) for more information.
Comments sent via email, including
all attachments, must not exceed a 25megabyte file size. Information on this
project can also be found on the
Protected Resources Web page at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
eis/arctic.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman, Jolie Harrison, or
Michael Payne, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, at (301) 427–8401 or
via email at
arcticeis.comments@noaa.gov.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:02 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101 (a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review. The term ‘‘take’’ under the
MMPA means ‘‘to harass, hunt, capture,
kill or collect, or attempt to harass,
hunt, capture, kill or collect.’’ Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as ‘‘any act of pursuit,
torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level
A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].’’
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ‘‘. . . an impact resulting
from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
NMFS, as the lead federal agency,
prepared this DEIS to evaluate a broad
range of reasonably foreseeable levels of
exploration activities and associated
mitigation measures that may occur
within the five-year period from the
date of completion of the Final EIS and
Record of Decision. BOEM and the NSB
are serving as formal cooperating
agencies; the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is serving as a consulting
agency; and NMFS is coordinating with
the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission
(AEWC) pursuant to our co-management
agreement under the MMPA.
NMFS has published this EIS to
disclose the potential impacts
associated with their issuance of ITAs
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for seismic surveys, ancillary activities,
and exploratory drilling under section
101(a)(5) of the MMPA and BOEM’s
authorization of G&G permits and
ancillary activities under the OCSLA.
Scoping
On February 8, 2010, NMFS provided
public notice (75 FR 6175) that it would
prepare an EIS to analyze the
environmental impacts of issuing ITAs
pursuant to the MMPA to the oil and gas
industry for the taking of marine
mammals incidental to offshore
exploration activities (e.g., seismic
surveys and exploratory drilling) in
Federal and state waters of the U.S.
Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off Alaska.
The 60-day public scoping period ended
on April 9, 2010.
Scoping was the first step in this
NEPA process (as required under 40
CFR 1501.7). Scoping provided an
opportunity for the public and agencies
to express their views and identify
issues to be addressed in the DEIS.
As part of scoping, NMFS hosted
public meetings to introduce the
proposed action, describe the EIS
process, and solicit input on the issues
and alternatives to be evaluated. Public
scoping meetings were held in February
and March 2010 in the communities of
Kotzebue, Point Hope, Point Lay,
Wainwright, Barrow, Nuiqsut, and
Kaktovik and in Anchorage, Alaska.
During the scoping comment period, 73
public comments were received. A
report summarizing these comments is
available on the project Web site at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
eis/arctic.htm.
Issues identified by the public during
the scoping process include, but are not
limited to, concerns regarding potential
impacts to marine mammals and
habitat, subsistence uses of marine
mammals, and other wildlife, as well as
concerns regarding the potential for an
oil spill. Some commenters also
expressed concerns about meeting
national energy demands. Substantive
comments received during the public
scoping period have been addressed in
the DEIS.
Alternatives
NMFS has evaluated five alternatives
in the DEIS. NMFS has not identified a
preferred alternative in the DEIS. In this
DEIS, NMFS and BOEM present and
assess a reasonable range of G&G,
ancillary, and exploratory drilling
activities expected to occur, as well as
a reasonable range of mitigation
measures, in order to accurately assess
the potential consequences of issuing
ITAs under the MMPA and permits
under the OCSLA. The potential level of
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 251 / Friday, December 30, 2011 / Notices
activity described by each alternative is
based on recent Federal and state lease
planning and recent industry plans for
both seismic surveys and exploratory
drilling programs in the Beaufort and
Chukchi Seas. Each alternative also
includes an analysis of a suite of
standard and additional mitigation
measures that have been identified to
help reduce impacts to marine
mammals and to ensure no unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of
marine mammals for subsistence uses.
The suite of measures are considered
and analyzed in all four of the action
alternatives. The alternatives are
summarized as follows:
Alternative 1: No Action Alternative:
Under the No Action Alternative, NMFS
would not issue any ITAs under the
MMPA for seismic surveys or
exploratory drilling in the Beaufort and
Chukchi Seas, and BOEM would not
issue G&G permits or authorize ancillary
activities in the Beaufort and Chukchi
Seas.
Alternative 2: Authorization for Level
1 Exploration Activity: Alternative 2
analyzes a certain amount of 2D/3D
seismic, site clearance and high
resolution shallow hazards, and on-ice
seismic surveys and exploratory drilling
programs to occur each year. Alternative
2 also evaluates a range of standard and
additional mitigation measures that
would be considered and incorporated
into any issued authorization (on a caseby-case basis). Examples of standard
and additional mitigation measures
include measures to: reduce acoustic
exposures (e.g., exclusion zones, flight
altitude restrictions, time/area closures);
reduce non-acoustic exposures (e.g.,
vessel speed restrictions, oil spill
prevention plans, limited or zero
discharge requirements); and ensure no
unmitigable adverse impact to
subsistence uses (e.g., time/area
closures, communication centers).
Alternative 3: Authorization for Level
2 Exploration Activity: Alternative 3
analyzes a level of 2D/3D seismic, site
clearance and high resolution shallow
hazards, and on-ice seismic surveys and
exploratory drilling programs to occur
each year that is higher than the level
contemplated under Alternative 2. The
same suite of standard and additional
mitigation measures that would be
considered and incorporated into any
issued authorization (on a case-by-case
basis) under Alternative 2 is considered
under Alternative 3.
Alternative 4: Authorization for Level
2 Exploration Activity with Additional
Required Time/Area Closures:
Alternative 4 considers the same level of
activity contemplated under Alternative
3 and also evaluates the same suite of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:02 Dec 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
standard and additional mitigation
measures. However, certain time/area
closures that would be considered on a
case-by-case basis under the other
alternatives would be required under
Alternative 4. The time/area closures
would be for specific areas important to
biological productivity, life history
functions for specific species of
concern, and subsistence activities.
Activities would not be permitted to
occur in any of the time/area closures
during the specific identified periods.
Additionally, buffer zones around these
time/area closures could potentially be
included.
Alternative 5: Authorization for Level
2 Exploration Activity with Use of
Alternative Technologies: Alternative 5
considers the same level of activity
contemplated under Alternative 3 and
also evaluates the same suite of standard
and additional mitigation measures.
However, Alternative 5 also includes
specific additional mitigation measures
that focus on the use of alternative
technologies that have the potential to
augment or replace traditional airgunbased seismic exploration activities in
the future.
Public Involvement
Comments will be accepted at public
hearings and during the public
comment period, and must be submitted
to NMFS by February 13, 2011 (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). We
request that you include in your
comments: (1) Your name, address, and
affiliation (if any); and (2) background
documents to support your comments as
appropriate.
Public scoping meetings will be held
in late January and early February 2012,
in the communities of Barrow, Kaktovik,
Kivalina, Kotzebue, Nuiqsut, Point
Hope, Point Lay, and Wainwright.
However, the final dates and times have
not yet been set. A supplement to this
Notice of Availability will be published
with the final meeting dates, times, and
locations. Comments will be accepted at
all public meetings, as well as during
the public comment period and can be
submitted via the methods described
earlier in this document (see
ADDRESSES).
Dated: December 20, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–33195 Filed 12–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
82277
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)
Nomination of Existing Marine
Protected Areas to the National
System of Marine Protected Areas
NOAA, Department of
Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Public notice and opportunity
for comment on the list of nominations
received from federal, state, territorial
and tribal marine protected area
programs to join the National System of
Marine Protected Areas.
AGENCY:
In July 2011, NOAA and the
Department of the Interior (DOI) invited
federal, state, commonwealth, and
territorial marine protected area (MPA)
programs with potentially eligible
existing MPAs to nominate their sites to
the National System of MPAs (national
system). The national system and the
nomination process are described in the
Framework for the National System of
Marine Protected Areas of the United
States (Framework), developed in
response to Executive Order 13158 on
Marine Protected Areas. The final
Framework was published on November
19, 2008, (73 FR 69608) and provides
guidance for collaborative efforts among
federal, state, commonwealth,
territorial, tribal and local governments
and stakeholders to develop an effective
and well coordinated national system of
MPAs that includes existing MPAs
meeting national system criteria as well
as new sites that may be established by
managing agencies to fill key
conservation gaps in important ocean
areas.
DATES: Comments on the nominations to
the national system are due February 13,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments should be sent to Lauren
Wenzel, NOAA, at (301) 713–3100, ext.
136 or via email at
mpa.comments@noaa.gov. A detailed
electronic copy of the List of National
System MPAs is available for download
at https://www.mpa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on National System
The national system is made up of
member MPA sites, networks and
systems established and managed by
federal, state, commonwealth,
territorial, tribal and/or local
governments that collectively enhance
conservation of the nation’s natural and
cultural marine heritage and represent
its diverse ecosystems and resources.
Although participating sites continue to
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 251 (Friday, December 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82275-82277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33195]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XA885
Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
[[Page 82276]]
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the ``Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in
the Arctic Ocean.'' Publication of this notice begins the official
public comment period for this DEIS. The purpose of the DEIS is to
evaluate, in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of
implementing the alternative approaches for authorizing the take of
marine mammals incidental to oil and gas exploration activities in the
Arctic Ocean pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The
U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
(BOEM) is a cooperating agency on this DEIS, and as such, this DEIS
also evaluates the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
of implementing the alternative approaches for authorizing geological
and geophysical (G&G) surveys and ancillary activities under the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) in the Arctic Ocean. The North
Slope Borough (NSB) is also a cooperating agency on this DEIS.
DATES: All comments and written statements must be received no later
than Monday, February 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and statements on the DEIS must be
postmarked by February 13, 2012. Comments on the DEIS may be submitted
by:
Email: arcticeis.comments@noaa.gov.
Mail: Office of Protected Resources, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Fax: (301) 713-0376.
Public Hearings: Oral and written comments will be
accepted during the upcoming public hearings. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, Public Hearings (below) for more information.
Comments sent via email, including all attachments, must not exceed
a 25-megabyte file size. Information on this project can also be found
on the Protected Resources Web page at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/arctic.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman, Jolie Harrison, or
Michael Payne, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, at (301) 427-8401
or via email at arcticeis.comments@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101 (a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review. The term ``take'' under the MMPA
means ``to harass, hunt, capture, kill or collect, or attempt to
harass, hunt, capture, kill or collect.'' Except with respect to
certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines ``harassment''
as ``any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of
behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].''
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``. . . an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
NMFS, as the lead federal agency, prepared this DEIS to evaluate a
broad range of reasonably foreseeable levels of exploration activities
and associated mitigation measures that may occur within the five-year
period from the date of completion of the Final EIS and Record of
Decision. BOEM and the NSB are serving as formal cooperating agencies;
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is serving as a consulting
agency; and NMFS is coordinating with the Alaska Eskimo Whaling
Commission (AEWC) pursuant to our co-management agreement under the
MMPA.
NMFS has published this EIS to disclose the potential impacts
associated with their issuance of ITAs for seismic surveys, ancillary
activities, and exploratory drilling under section 101(a)(5) of the
MMPA and BOEM's authorization of G&G permits and ancillary activities
under the OCSLA.
Scoping
On February 8, 2010, NMFS provided public notice (75 FR 6175) that
it would prepare an EIS to analyze the environmental impacts of issuing
ITAs pursuant to the MMPA to the oil and gas industry for the taking of
marine mammals incidental to offshore exploration activities (e.g.,
seismic surveys and exploratory drilling) in Federal and state waters
of the U.S. Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off Alaska. The 60-day public
scoping period ended on April 9, 2010.
Scoping was the first step in this NEPA process (as required under
40 CFR 1501.7). Scoping provided an opportunity for the public and
agencies to express their views and identify issues to be addressed in
the DEIS.
As part of scoping, NMFS hosted public meetings to introduce the
proposed action, describe the EIS process, and solicit input on the
issues and alternatives to be evaluated. Public scoping meetings were
held in February and March 2010 in the communities of Kotzebue, Point
Hope, Point Lay, Wainwright, Barrow, Nuiqsut, and Kaktovik and in
Anchorage, Alaska. During the scoping comment period, 73 public
comments were received. A report summarizing these comments is
available on the project Web site at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/arctic.htm.
Issues identified by the public during the scoping process include,
but are not limited to, concerns regarding potential impacts to marine
mammals and habitat, subsistence uses of marine mammals, and other
wildlife, as well as concerns regarding the potential for an oil spill.
Some commenters also expressed concerns about meeting national energy
demands. Substantive comments received during the public scoping period
have been addressed in the DEIS.
Alternatives
NMFS has evaluated five alternatives in the DEIS. NMFS has not
identified a preferred alternative in the DEIS. In this DEIS, NMFS and
BOEM present and assess a reasonable range of G&G, ancillary, and
exploratory drilling activities expected to occur, as well as a
reasonable range of mitigation measures, in order to accurately assess
the potential consequences of issuing ITAs under the MMPA and permits
under the OCSLA. The potential level of
[[Page 82277]]
activity described by each alternative is based on recent Federal and
state lease planning and recent industry plans for both seismic surveys
and exploratory drilling programs in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.
Each alternative also includes an analysis of a suite of standard and
additional mitigation measures that have been identified to help reduce
impacts to marine mammals and to ensure no unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of marine mammals for subsistence uses. The suite
of measures are considered and analyzed in all four of the action
alternatives. The alternatives are summarized as follows:
Alternative 1: No Action Alternative: Under the No Action
Alternative, NMFS would not issue any ITAs under the MMPA for seismic
surveys or exploratory drilling in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, and
BOEM would not issue G&G permits or authorize ancillary activities in
the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.
Alternative 2: Authorization for Level 1 Exploration Activity:
Alternative 2 analyzes a certain amount of 2D/3D seismic, site
clearance and high resolution shallow hazards, and on-ice seismic
surveys and exploratory drilling programs to occur each year.
Alternative 2 also evaluates a range of standard and additional
mitigation measures that would be considered and incorporated into any
issued authorization (on a case-by-case basis). Examples of standard
and additional mitigation measures include measures to: reduce acoustic
exposures (e.g., exclusion zones, flight altitude restrictions, time/
area closures); reduce non-acoustic exposures (e.g., vessel speed
restrictions, oil spill prevention plans, limited or zero discharge
requirements); and ensure no unmitigable adverse impact to subsistence
uses (e.g., time/area closures, communication centers).
Alternative 3: Authorization for Level 2 Exploration Activity:
Alternative 3 analyzes a level of 2D/3D seismic, site clearance and
high resolution shallow hazards, and on-ice seismic surveys and
exploratory drilling programs to occur each year that is higher than
the level contemplated under Alternative 2. The same suite of standard
and additional mitigation measures that would be considered and
incorporated into any issued authorization (on a case-by-case basis)
under Alternative 2 is considered under Alternative 3.
Alternative 4: Authorization for Level 2 Exploration Activity with
Additional Required Time/Area Closures: Alternative 4 considers the
same level of activity contemplated under Alternative 3 and also
evaluates the same suite of standard and additional mitigation
measures. However, certain time/area closures that would be considered
on a case-by-case basis under the other alternatives would be required
under Alternative 4. The time/area closures would be for specific areas
important to biological productivity, life history functions for
specific species of concern, and subsistence activities. Activities
would not be permitted to occur in any of the time/area closures during
the specific identified periods. Additionally, buffer zones around
these time/area closures could potentially be included.
Alternative 5: Authorization for Level 2 Exploration Activity with
Use of Alternative Technologies: Alternative 5 considers the same level
of activity contemplated under Alternative 3 and also evaluates the
same suite of standard and additional mitigation measures. However,
Alternative 5 also includes specific additional mitigation measures
that focus on the use of alternative technologies that have the
potential to augment or replace traditional airgun-based seismic
exploration activities in the future.
Public Involvement
Comments will be accepted at public hearings and during the public
comment period, and must be submitted to NMFS by February 13, 2011 (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). We request that you include in your
comments: (1) Your name, address, and affiliation (if any); and (2)
background documents to support your comments as appropriate.
Public scoping meetings will be held in late January and early
February 2012, in the communities of Barrow, Kaktovik, Kivalina,
Kotzebue, Nuiqsut, Point Hope, Point Lay, and Wainwright. However, the
final dates and times have not yet been set. A supplement to this
Notice of Availability will be published with the final meeting dates,
times, and locations. Comments will be accepted at all public meetings,
as well as during the public comment period and can be submitted via
the methods described earlier in this document (see ADDRESSES).
Dated: December 20, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-33195 Filed 12-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P