TRICARE; Extended Care Health Option, 81897-81899 [2011-33384]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(j) No Alternative Actions Intervals, and/or
Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs)
After accomplishing the revisions required
by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or
CDCCLs may be used other than those
specified in Part 2—Airworthiness Limitation
Inspection (ALI)—Structures, of Appendix A,
Airworthiness Limitations of the EMBRAER
170 MRBR MRB–1621, Appendix A, Part 2,
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 7, dated
November 11, 2010; and Temporary Revision
(TR) 7–1, dated February 11, 2011, to Part 2—
Airworthiness Limitation Inspection (ALI)—
Structures, of Appendix A, Airworthiness
Limitations of the EMBRAER 170 MRBR
MRB–1621, Revision 7, dated November 11,
2010, unless the actions, intervals, and/or
CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–2768; fax (425)
227–1320. Information may be emailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(l) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directive 2011–04–01, dated May 5, 2011;
and Part 2—Airworthiness Limitation
Inspection (ALI)—Structures, of Appendix A,
Airworthiness Limitations of the EMBRAER
170 MRBR MRB–1621, Appendix A, Part 2,
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 7, dated
November 11, 2010; and Temporary Revision
(TR) 7–1, dated February 11, 2011, to Part 2—
Airworthiness Limitation Inspection (ALI)—
Structures, of Appendix A, Airworthiness
Limitations of the EMBRAER 170 MRBR
MRB–1621, Revision 7, dated November 11,
2010; for related information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Dec 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 19, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–33279 Filed 12–28–11; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD–2011–HA–0076]
RIN 0720–AB53
TRICARE; Extended Care Health
Option
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense
(DoD) is publishing this proposed rule
to establish TRICARE coverage under
the Extended Care Health Option
(ECHO) of Applied Behavior Analysis
(ABA) for Autism Spectrum Disorders
(ASD).
DATES: Written comments received at
the address indicated below by February
27, 2012 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by docket number
and/or Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) and title by either of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, Room 3C843, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for Federal
Register document. The General policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael Kottyan, TRICARE
Management Activity, Medical Benefits
and Reimbursement Branch, telephone
(303) 676–3520.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In response to Section 717 of the John
Warner National Defense Authorization
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81897
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA FY
2007) [Pub. L. 109–364, October 17,
2006], DoD submitted to Congress in
July 2007 the ‘‘Department of Defense
Report and Plan on Services to Military
Dependent Children with Autism.’’ The
plan included a proposal to use the
authority under 10 U.S.C. 1092 to
conduct a Demonstration within the
ECHO with a view to improving the
quality, efficiency, convenience and
cost effectiveness of providing services
to eligible Active Duty Family Members
(ADFM) diagnosed with one of the
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD).
Central to the Demonstration was the
authority under 10 U.S.C. 1092 to
provide reimbursement for the one-onone Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
services rendered by an individual who
is not a TRICARE-authorized provider.
Such non-certified individual, referred
to in the Demonstration as a ‘‘Tutor,’’ is
referred to in this proposed rule as an
‘‘ABA Tutor.’’ This rule requires that
ABA Tutors meet the minimum
requirements set forth in the current
demonstration or, at the discretion of
the Director, TRICARE Management
Activity (TMA), the DoD may either
adopt standards established in the
future by a qualified accreditation
organization as defined in title 32, Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), 199.2 (32
CFR 199.2) or, after review and analysis
of the effectiveness of ABA Tutors with
various levels of training, establish
additional education, training or
certification requirements for ABA
Tutors. Although it is common practice
to use ABA Tutors to render direct
‘‘hands-on’’ contact with those
diagnosed with an ASD, currently there
is no national certification process or
governance body that sets uniform
education, experience, oversight and
disciplinary standards for Tutors.
The purpose of the Demonstation was
to test whether a tiered delivery and
reimbursement methodology for ABA
services would (1) provide increased
access to ABA services, (2) provide ABA
services to those most likely to benefit
from them, (3) ensure the quality of
ABA services by utilizing a professional
community of providers including
providers certified by the Behavior
Analyst Certification Board (BACB), and
4) determine whether requirements are
being met for State licensure or
certification where such exists.
Following publication of the ‘‘Notice’’
in the Federal Register on December 4,
2007 (72 FR 68130) the Department of
Defense Enhanced Access to Autism
Services Demonstration [the
‘‘Demonstration’’] was implemented on
March 15, 2008 for a two-year period.
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
81898
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2011 / Proposed Rules
To provide the DoD with information
necessary to make sound judgments
regarding payment for ABA services, it
was determined that the Demonstration
should be extended to collect sufficient
comprehensive data. By ‘‘Notice’’
published in the Federal Register on
February 26, 2010 (75 FR 8927) the
Demonstration was extended until
March 14, 2012, under the same terms
and conditions in the original notice.
As required by 10 U.S.C. 1092, the
DoD’s evaluation of the results of the
Demonstration concluded that it was
successful and upon final
implementation of this rule intends to
adopt a tiered ABA services delivery
and reimbursement methodology.
Additionally, DoD found that the
Demonstration:
• Contributed to parental perception
of positive outcomes for eligible
dependents, as evidenced by parental
responses to the DoD survey;
• Increased the number of and access
to the services of authorized ABA
providers, as evidenced by the sustained
three to five percent (3–5%) monthly
growth in the number of Demonstration
enrollees; and
• Contributed to improved military
family readiness and retention as
evidenced by parents of children
enrolled in the Demonstration were
more likely to say they will stay in the
military as a result of the ABA services
received by their child.
DoD believes the evaluation provides
evidence supporting the position that
the ABA services provided in the
Demonstration may generally have had
a positive impact on the lives of some
of the children with autism and their
families. The evaluation shows that the
parents of dependent children with
autism who responded to the DoD
survey have a perception of positive
impacts.
Therefore, to increase access to ABA
services for ECHO-registered
dependents who are diagnosed with an
ASD, DoD is promulgating this rule to
adopt the provider model of the
Demonstration under the authority of 10
U.S.C. 1079(e) and to establish the
requirements for ABA providers and
reimbursement for ABA services.
This rule also proposes to establish
that certain individual professional
providers, specifically, psychiatrists,
clinical psychologists, certified
psychiatric nurse specialists, and
clinical social workers, and other
individuals who maintain current
certification by the Behavior Analyst
Certification Board (BACB) or
comparable certifying entity as may be
approved by the Director, TMA, and,
who maintain a current Participation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Dec 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
Agreement with the Director, TMA, are
eligible to be applied behavior analysis
authorized providers.
This rule indicates that TRICARE
coverage of ABA services is subject to
the requirement in 32 CFR 199.5(d)(10).
That is, services or items paid for, or
eligible for payment, directly or
indirectly by a public facility, as defined
in 32 CFR 199.2, or by the Federal
government, other than the Department
of Defense, are excluded except when
such services or items are eligible for
payment under a state plan for medical
assistance under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act (Medicaid).
This rule also proposes to establish
that the Director, TRICARE Management
Activity will determine the
requirements for ABA Authorized
Providers and ABA Tutors, and the
allowed amount of reimbursement for
ABA services.
II. Summary of Regulatory Revisions
32 CFR 199.5 addresses the DoD
Extended Care Health Option (ECHO).
Section 199.5 is proposed to be
revised to establish that Applied
Behavior Analysis provided to address
the effects of Autism Spectrum
Disorders is an ‘‘Other service,’’ as that
term is used in 10 U.S.C. 1079(e).
32 CFR 199.6 addresses TRICAREauthorized providers.
Section 199.6 is proposed to be
revised to establish the requirements for
designation as an ‘‘Applied Behavior
Analysis (ABA) Authorized Provider’’ of
ABA services to ECHO-registered
beneficiaries diagnosed with an Autism
Spectrum Disorder.
This rule also indicates that
reimbursement may be made to an
Applied Behavior Analysis Authorized
Provider for ABA services rendered by
ABA Tutors who work under the
supervision and direction of an Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA) Supervisor.
III. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Section 801 of title 5, United States
Code, and Executive Orders (E.O.)
12866 and 13563 require certain
regulatory assessments and procedures
for any major rule or significant
regulatory action, defined as one that
would result in an annual effect of $100
million or more on the national
economy or which would have other
substantial impacts. It has been certified
that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Public Law 104–4, Section 202,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
Section 202 of Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,’’
requires that an analysis be performed
to determine whether any Federal
mandate may result in the expenditure
by State, local and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector
of $100 million in any one year. It has
been certified that this proposed rule
does not contain a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year,
and thus this rule is not subject to this
requirement.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601)
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601),
requires that each Federal agency
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
when the agency issues a regulation
which would have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule is not an
economically significant regulatory
action, and it has been certified that it
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of the RFA.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain a
‘‘collection of information’’
requirement, and will not impose
additional information collection
requirements on the public under Public
Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction
Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
E.O. 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ requires
that an impact analysis be performed to
determine whether the rule has
Federalism implications that would
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. It has been
certified that this rule does not have
Federalism implications, as set forth in
E.O. 13132.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Extended benefits for family members
of Active Duty Service members, Health
care, Autism spectrum disorders,
Applied behavior analysis, Military
personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is
amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2011 / Proposed Rules
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 199
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.5 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(8)(iv) to read as
follows:
§ 199.5 TRICARE Extended Care Health
Option (ECHO).
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(8) * * *
(iv) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
for ECHO-registered beneficiaries with
an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA) is an ‘‘Other
service’’ as that term is used in 10
U.S.C. 1079(e), that may be reimbursed
to an applied behavior analysis
authorized provider to address the
effects of an Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Reimbursement for ABA services will be
as determined by the Director, TRICARE
Management Activity.
(A) Services provided by this
paragraph are subject to the
requirements of paragraph (d)(10) of this
section.
(B) Definition of specific terms used
in this paragraph and Section 199.6 of
this part.
(1) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Authorized Provider. An individual, a
corporation, a foundation, or a public
entity meeting the requirements of
§ 199.6(e)(2)(iv) of this part who or that
provides ABA services to ECHOregistered beneficiaries diagnosed with
an Autism Spectrum Disorder.
(2) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Services. Such non-medical services
determined by the Director, TMA to be
appropriate to reduce the disabling
effects of ASD for ECHO-registered
beneficiaries, which may include, but
are not limited to: conducting the initial
and ongoing Functional Behavioral
Assessments and Analysis; developing
and revising as necessary the Behavior
Plan that details the ABA intervention
services and methods to be used;
supervising or directing ABA Tutor(s);
training the beneficiary’s primary
caregivers to reinforce the interventions
detailed in the Behavior Plan; and
periodically reporting the beneficiary’s
progress to the primary caregivers.
(3) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Supervisor. An individual Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized
Provider who provides ABA Services
through the supervision and direction of
ABA Tutors. Only individuals who are
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Authorized Providers may act as
Supervisors. Corporations, foundations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Dec 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
or public entities may not act as ABA
Supervisors.
(4) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Tutor. An individual who renders oneon-one ABA interventions to a TRICARE
beneficiary diagnosed with an Autism
Spectrum Disorder. ABA Tutors are not
considered an ‘‘Authorized Provider’’
(refer to § 199.2 of this part) or an
‘‘Authorized Applied Behavior Analysis
(ABA) Provider’’ and are not eligible for
direct reimbursement by TRICARE.
(5) Autism Spectrum Disorders. The
Pervasive Development Disorders listed
in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, [DSM–IV–TR
(fourth edition, text revision), 2000], or
a superseding current edition of the
DSM, specifically, ‘‘Autistic Disorder’’,
‘‘Rett’s Disorder’’, Childhood
Disintegrative Disorder’’, ‘‘Asperger’s
Disorder’’, and ‘‘Pervasive Development
Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
(including Atypical Autism)’’Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized
Provider.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 199.6 is amended by
adding paragraphs (e)(2)(iv) through
(e)(2)(iv)(D) in to read as follows:
§ 199.6
TRICARE-Authorized Providers.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) ECHO Applied Behavior Analysis
(ABA) Authorized Provider.
(A) The following are authorized
providers of Applied Behavior Analysis
(ABA) services authorized by
§ 199.5(c)(8)(iv) of this part to address
the effects of a diagnosed Autism
Spectrum Disorder (ASD):
(1) Psychiatrists, clinical
psychologists, certified psychiatric
nurse specialists, and clinical social
workers who provide ABA services
within the scope of their license as an
individual professional provider.
(2) Individuals who meet all ABArelated applicable licensing or other
regulatory requirements of the state,
county, municipality, or other political
jurisdiction in which ABA services are
rendered.
(3) Where such licensing or regulatory
requirements referenced in paragraph
(e)(2)(iv)(A)(2) of this section do not
exist, an individual who maintains
current certification by the Behavior
Analyst Certification Board (BACB).
(4) A corporation, foundation, or
public entity that renders ABA services
and that meets all applicable licensing
or other regulatory requirements of the
state, county, municipality, or other
political jurisdiction in which ABA
services are rendered.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81899
(B) All providers under paragraph
(e)(2)(iv)(A) of this section shall
maintain a current Participation
Agreement with the Director, TRICARE
Management Activity.
(C) Reimbursement for ABA Services
may be made to the following:
(1) ABA Authorized Providers under
paragraphs (e)(2)(iv)(A)(1) through (3) of
this section for ABA Services provided
by themselves directly to ECHOregistered beneficiaries or for the ABA
Services rendered by ABA Tutors under
their supervision and direction.
(2) ABA Authorized Providers under
paragraph (e)(2)(iv)(A)(4) of this section
for ABA Services provided to ECHOregistered beneficiaries when rendered
in accordance with the requirements of
this Section by individuals employed by
or under contract with an ABA
Authorized Provider described in
paragraph (e)(2)(iv)(A)(4) of this section.
Note: Tutors shall meet all requirements
established by the Director, TRICARE
Management Activity. Tutors are not ‘‘ECHO
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Authorized Providers’’ and are not eligible
for direct TRICARE reimbursement for ABA
services they render.
(D) TRICARE reimbursement for ABA
services shall be the TRICARE allowed
amount as determined by the Director,
TRICARE Management Activity.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 23, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33384 Filed 12–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[DOD–2011–HA–0085]
RIN 0720–AB54
32 CFR Part 199
TRICARE; Removal of the Prohibition
to Use Addictive Drugs in the
Maintenance Treatment of Substance
Dependence in TRICARE Beneficiaries
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes revisions
to remove the exclusion of drug abuse
maintenance programs and allow as part
of a comprehensive treatment plan for
an individual with substance
dependence, the substitution of a
therapeutic drug with addictive
potential for a drug of addiction (e.g. the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 250 (Thursday, December 29, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81897-81899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33384]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD-2011-HA-0076]
RIN 0720-AB53
TRICARE; Extended Care Health Option
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD) is publishing this proposed
rule to establish TRICARE coverage under the Extended Care Health
Option (ECHO) of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) for Autism Spectrum
Disorders (ASD).
DATES: Written comments received at the address indicated below by
February 27, 2012 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted, identified by docket number and/
or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title by either of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843,
1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for Federal Register document. The General
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Kottyan, TRICARE
Management Activity, Medical Benefits and Reimbursement Branch,
telephone (303) 676-3520.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In response to Section 717 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA FY 2007) [Pub. L. 109-364,
October 17, 2006], DoD submitted to Congress in July 2007 the
``Department of Defense Report and Plan on Services to Military
Dependent Children with Autism.'' The plan included a proposal to use
the authority under 10 U.S.C. 1092 to conduct a Demonstration within
the ECHO with a view to improving the quality, efficiency, convenience
and cost effectiveness of providing services to eligible Active Duty
Family Members (ADFM) diagnosed with one of the Autism Spectrum
Disorders (ASD). Central to the Demonstration was the authority under
10 U.S.C. 1092 to provide reimbursement for the one-on-one Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA) services rendered by an individual who is not a
TRICARE-authorized provider. Such non-certified individual, referred to
in the Demonstration as a ``Tutor,'' is referred to in this proposed
rule as an ``ABA Tutor.'' This rule requires that ABA Tutors meet the
minimum requirements set forth in the current demonstration or, at the
discretion of the Director, TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), the DoD
may either adopt standards established in the future by a qualified
accreditation organization as defined in title 32, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), 199.2 (32 CFR 199.2) or, after review and analysis
of the effectiveness of ABA Tutors with various levels of training,
establish additional education, training or certification requirements
for ABA Tutors. Although it is common practice to use ABA Tutors to
render direct ``hands-on'' contact with those diagnosed with an ASD,
currently there is no national certification process or governance body
that sets uniform education, experience, oversight and disciplinary
standards for Tutors.
The purpose of the Demonstation was to test whether a tiered
delivery and reimbursement methodology for ABA services would (1)
provide increased access to ABA services, (2) provide ABA services to
those most likely to benefit from them, (3) ensure the quality of ABA
services by utilizing a professional community of providers including
providers certified by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB),
and 4) determine whether requirements are being met for State licensure
or certification where such exists.
Following publication of the ``Notice'' in the Federal Register on
December 4, 2007 (72 FR 68130) the Department of Defense Enhanced
Access to Autism Services Demonstration [the ``Demonstration''] was
implemented on March 15, 2008 for a two-year period.
[[Page 81898]]
To provide the DoD with information necessary to make sound
judgments regarding payment for ABA services, it was determined that
the Demonstration should be extended to collect sufficient
comprehensive data. By ``Notice'' published in the Federal Register on
February 26, 2010 (75 FR 8927) the Demonstration was extended until
March 14, 2012, under the same terms and conditions in the original
notice.
As required by 10 U.S.C. 1092, the DoD's evaluation of the results
of the Demonstration concluded that it was successful and upon final
implementation of this rule intends to adopt a tiered ABA services
delivery and reimbursement methodology.
Additionally, DoD found that the Demonstration:
Contributed to parental perception of positive outcomes
for eligible dependents, as evidenced by parental responses to the DoD
survey;
Increased the number of and access to the services of
authorized ABA providers, as evidenced by the sustained three to five
percent (3-5%) monthly growth in the number of Demonstration enrollees;
and
Contributed to improved military family readiness and
retention as evidenced by parents of children enrolled in the
Demonstration were more likely to say they will stay in the military as
a result of the ABA services received by their child.
DoD believes the evaluation provides evidence supporting the
position that the ABA services provided in the Demonstration may
generally have had a positive impact on the lives of some of the
children with autism and their families. The evaluation shows that the
parents of dependent children with autism who responded to the DoD
survey have a perception of positive impacts.
Therefore, to increase access to ABA services for ECHO-registered
dependents who are diagnosed with an ASD, DoD is promulgating this rule
to adopt the provider model of the Demonstration under the authority of
10 U.S.C. 1079(e) and to establish the requirements for ABA providers
and reimbursement for ABA services.
This rule also proposes to establish that certain individual
professional providers, specifically, psychiatrists, clinical
psychologists, certified psychiatric nurse specialists, and clinical
social workers, and other individuals who maintain current
certification by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) or
comparable certifying entity as may be approved by the Director, TMA,
and, who maintain a current Participation Agreement with the Director,
TMA, are eligible to be applied behavior analysis authorized providers.
This rule indicates that TRICARE coverage of ABA services is
subject to the requirement in 32 CFR 199.5(d)(10). That is, services or
items paid for, or eligible for payment, directly or indirectly by a
public facility, as defined in 32 CFR 199.2, or by the Federal
government, other than the Department of Defense, are excluded except
when such services or items are eligible for payment under a state plan
for medical assistance under Title XIX of the Social Security Act
(Medicaid).
This rule also proposes to establish that the Director, TRICARE
Management Activity will determine the requirements for ABA Authorized
Providers and ABA Tutors, and the allowed amount of reimbursement for
ABA services.
II. Summary of Regulatory Revisions
32 CFR 199.5 addresses the DoD Extended Care Health Option (ECHO).
Section 199.5 is proposed to be revised to establish that Applied
Behavior Analysis provided to address the effects of Autism Spectrum
Disorders is an ``Other service,'' as that term is used in 10 U.S.C.
1079(e).
32 CFR 199.6 addresses TRICARE-authorized providers.
Section 199.6 is proposed to be revised to establish the
requirements for designation as an ``Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Authorized Provider'' of ABA services to ECHO-registered beneficiaries
diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder.
This rule also indicates that reimbursement may be made to an
Applied Behavior Analysis Authorized Provider for ABA services rendered
by ABA Tutors who work under the supervision and direction of an
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Supervisor.
III. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Section 801 of title 5, United States Code, and Executive Orders
(E.O.) 12866 and 13563 require certain regulatory assessments and
procedures for any major rule or significant regulatory action, defined
as one that would result in an annual effect of $100 million or more on
the national economy or which would have other substantial impacts. It
has been certified that this rule is not a significant regulatory
action.
Public Law 104-4, Section 202, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202 of Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,''
requires that an analysis be performed to determine whether any Federal
mandate may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million
in any one year. It has been certified that this proposed rule does not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million or more in any one year, and thus this rule is not
subject to this requirement.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601)
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601), requires that each Federal agency prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation which would
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule is not an economically significant regulatory action, and it
has been certified that it will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of the RFA.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain a ``collection of information''
requirement, and will not impose additional information collection
requirements on the public under Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork
Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
E.O. 13132, ``Federalism,'' requires that an impact analysis be
performed to determine whether the rule has Federalism implications
that would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. It has been certified that this rule does not have
Federalism implications, as set forth in E.O. 13132.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Extended benefits for family members of Active Duty Service
members, Health care, Autism spectrum disorders, Applied behavior
analysis, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is amended as follows:
[[Page 81899]]
PART 199--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 199 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.
2. Section 199.5 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(8)(iv) to read
as follows:
Sec. 199.5 TRICARE Extended Care Health Option (ECHO).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(8) * * *
(iv) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) for ECHO-registered
beneficiaries with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Behavior
Analysis (ABA) is an ``Other service'' as that term is used in 10
U.S.C. 1079(e), that may be reimbursed to an applied behavior analysis
authorized provider to address the effects of an Autism Spectrum
Disorder. Reimbursement for ABA services will be as determined by the
Director, TRICARE Management Activity.
(A) Services provided by this paragraph are subject to the
requirements of paragraph (d)(10) of this section.
(B) Definition of specific terms used in this paragraph and Section
199.6 of this part.
(1) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized Provider. An
individual, a corporation, a foundation, or a public entity meeting the
requirements of Sec. 199.6(e)(2)(iv) of this part who or that provides
ABA services to ECHO-registered beneficiaries diagnosed with an Autism
Spectrum Disorder.
(2) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Services. Such non-medical
services determined by the Director, TMA to be appropriate to reduce
the disabling effects of ASD for ECHO-registered beneficiaries, which
may include, but are not limited to: conducting the initial and ongoing
Functional Behavioral Assessments and Analysis; developing and revising
as necessary the Behavior Plan that details the ABA intervention
services and methods to be used; supervising or directing ABA Tutor(s);
training the beneficiary's primary caregivers to reinforce the
interventions detailed in the Behavior Plan; and periodically reporting
the beneficiary's progress to the primary caregivers.
(3) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Supervisor. An individual
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized Provider who provides ABA
Services through the supervision and direction of ABA Tutors. Only
individuals who are Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized
Providers may act as Supervisors. Corporations, foundations or public
entities may not act as ABA Supervisors.
(4) Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Tutor. An individual who
renders one-on-one ABA interventions to a TRICARE beneficiary diagnosed
with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. ABA Tutors are not considered an
``Authorized Provider'' (refer to Sec. 199.2 of this part) or an
``Authorized Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Provider'' and are not
eligible for direct reimbursement by TRICARE.
(5) Autism Spectrum Disorders. The Pervasive Development Disorders
listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
[DSM-IV-TR (fourth edition, text revision), 2000], or a superseding
current edition of the DSM, specifically, ``Autistic Disorder'',
``Rett's Disorder'', Childhood Disintegrative Disorder'', ``Asperger's
Disorder'', and ``Pervasive Development Disorder Not Otherwise
Specified (including Atypical Autism)''Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Authorized Provider.
* * * * *
3. Section 199.6 is amended by adding paragraphs (e)(2)(iv) through
(e)(2)(iv)(D) in to read as follows:
Sec. 199.6 TRICARE-Authorized Providers.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) ECHO Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized Provider.
(A) The following are authorized providers of Applied Behavior
Analysis (ABA) services authorized by Sec. 199.5(c)(8)(iv) of this
part to address the effects of a diagnosed Autism Spectrum Disorder
(ASD):
(1) Psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, certified psychiatric
nurse specialists, and clinical social workers who provide ABA services
within the scope of their license as an individual professional
provider.
(2) Individuals who meet all ABA-related applicable licensing or
other regulatory requirements of the state, county, municipality, or
other political jurisdiction in which ABA services are rendered.
(3) Where such licensing or regulatory requirements referenced in
paragraph (e)(2)(iv)(A)(2) of this section do not exist, an individual
who maintains current certification by the Behavior Analyst
Certification Board (BACB).
(4) A corporation, foundation, or public entity that renders ABA
services and that meets all applicable licensing or other regulatory
requirements of the state, county, municipality, or other political
jurisdiction in which ABA services are rendered.
(B) All providers under paragraph (e)(2)(iv)(A) of this section
shall maintain a current Participation Agreement with the Director,
TRICARE Management Activity.
(C) Reimbursement for ABA Services may be made to the following:
(1) ABA Authorized Providers under paragraphs (e)(2)(iv)(A)(1)
through (3) of this section for ABA Services provided by themselves
directly to ECHO-registered beneficiaries or for the ABA Services
rendered by ABA Tutors under their supervision and direction.
(2) ABA Authorized Providers under paragraph (e)(2)(iv)(A)(4) of
this section for ABA Services provided to ECHO-registered beneficiaries
when rendered in accordance with the requirements of this Section by
individuals employed by or under contract with an ABA Authorized
Provider described in paragraph (e)(2)(iv)(A)(4) of this section.
Note: Tutors shall meet all requirements established by the
Director, TRICARE Management Activity. Tutors are not ``ECHO Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA) Authorized Providers'' and are not eligible
for direct TRICARE reimbursement for ABA services they render.
(D) TRICARE reimbursement for ABA services shall be the TRICARE
allowed amount as determined by the Director, TRICARE Management
Activity.
* * * * *
Dated: December 23, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-33384 Filed 12-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P