DoD Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Program, 80744-80747 [2011-33104]
Download as PDF
80744
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
of clinical work and 100 hours of faceto-face supervision; and
(3) Is licensed or certified to practice
as a mental health counselor by the
jurisdiction where practicing (see
paragraph (c)(3)(iv)(D) of this section for
more specific information); and
(4) May only be reimbursed when:
(i) The TRICARE beneficiary is
referred for therapy by a physician; and
(ii) A physician is providing ongoing
oversight and supervision of the therapy
being provided; and
(iii) The mental health counselor
certifies on each claim for
reimbursement that a written
communication has been made or will
be made to the referring physician of the
results of the treatment. Such
communication will be made at the end
of the treatment, or more frequently, as
required by the referring physician
(refer to § 199.7 of this part); and
(iv) The date of services provided is
on or before December 31, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33109 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[DOD–2010–OS–0043; RIN 0790–AI62]
32 CFR Part 222
DoD Mandatory Declassification
Review (MDR) Program
Department of Defense.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This part implements policy
established in DoD Instruction 5200.01.
It assigns responsibilities and provides
procedures for members of the public to
request a declassification review of
information classified under the
provisions of Executive Order 13526, or
predecessor orders.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective January 26, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Storer, (571) 372–0483.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Defense published a
proposed rule on September 27, 2010
(75 FR 59176–59179). Three sets of
comments were received and are
addressed below.
Comment 1: As an initial matter, this
proposed rule contains no paragraph (j),
and there appears to be no current
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:56 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
paragraph (j) to which this could be
referring. While it is entirely reasonable
for the DoD to amend this rule later to
cover the issue of fees, it is improper for
the DoD to include a reference now to
a potential later amendment that will
itself have to go through the notice and
comment rulemaking procedure. It is far
more reasonable to leave this
subparagraph out of the current iteration
and add it when the actual paragraph (j)
is added to the rule.
Response 1: Paragraph revised to be
consistent with section 2001.33(e) of 32
CFR (see section 222.10).
Comment 2: It is entirely proper that
a requester shall not be given MDR
appeal rights for records withheld
pursuant to FOIA exemptions. However,
it is not proper for records to be
withheld pursuant to FOIA exemptions
as part of the MDR process without
providing the proper appeal rights that
accompany all FOIA withholding
decisions.
Response 2: The FOIA and MDR
process are separate and distinct
processes. A MDR is not a FOIA
Request; a requester does not have the
right to appeal MDR’s denied under
FOIA exemptions without having filed a
FOIA Request. If a requester is denied
under the rules of FOIA, the requester
must submit a FOIA request for those
records in order to have the exemptions
examined. (See par 4 and par 5(c)3(d) of
section 222.5.)
Comment 3: Proposed Section
222.5(a)(vii) reads as follows: ‘‘This
section shall not apply to any request
for a review made to an element of the
Intelligence Community that is made by
a person other than an individual as that
term is defined by 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(2),
or by a foreign government entity or any
representative thereof.’’
This language differs meaningfully
from the interpretive guidance rules in
Section 32 CFR 2001.33(i), which say, in
part, ‘‘requests for mandatory
declassification review made to an
element of the Intelligence Community
by anyone other than a citizen of the
United States or an alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence may
be denied by the receiving Intelligence
Community element.’’
Response 3: Section removed from
final rule.
4: Comments from DoD Internal
review of proposed rule:
a. Change the Executive Order in the
last line of Paragraph 1 from 12958 to
13526.
b. Appoint an appellate authority and
process MDR appeals for information
originating in the OSD, the Office of the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Joint Staff, and DoD components not
listed in the Appendix to Enclosure 2.
c. Insert reference to DoD 5200.1–R so
the paragraph reads ‘‘The DoD
Components shall process MDR requests
* * * in accordance with DoD 5200.1–
R and Part 2001 of title 32 * * *’’
d. Replace paragraph 7.b with the
following (or similar) statement: ‘‘The
DoD Component shall consult with DOS
as necessary to determine whether the
information is subject to a treaty or
international agreement that would
prevent its declassification. The office to
consult is * * *’’ (U//FOUO) The
purpose of the statement is to allow DoD
intelligence organizations that have
existing, authorized agreements for
coordinating actions on FGI to continue
to use those arrangements with
counterpart organizations of foreign
governments for the purposes of
coordinating Mandatory Declassification
actions.
e. Updated all DoD Component
contact information.
Response to Internal Comments:
Internal comments from staffing reviews
were incorporated as appropriate.
Changes were made in the following
sections: references, paragraph (d),
§ 222.5 MDR processing procedures of
the final in response to the comments
received.
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
222 does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a section of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribunal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive Orders.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
222 does not contain a Federal mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local and tribunal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
222 is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The rule implements the procedures for
the effective administration of the DoD
MDR Program.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
222 does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
222 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. This rule does not have
substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the
National Government and the States; or
(3) The distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 222
Declassification, Security information.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 222 is
added to read as follows:
■
PART 222—DOD MANDATORY
DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW (MDR)
PROGRAM
Sec.
222.1
222.2
222.3
222.4
222.5
Purpose.
Applicability.
Definitions.
Responsibilities.
MDR processing procedures.
Appendix A to Part 222—Addressing
MDR requests.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
§ 222.1
Purpose.
This part implements policy
established in DoD Instruction 5200.01.
It assigns responsibilities and provides
procedures for members of the public to
request a declassification review of
information classified under the
provisions of Executive Order 13526, or
predecessor orders.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 222.2
Applicability.
This part applies to the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, the Military
Departments, the Office of the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint
Staff, the Combatant Commands, the
Office of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense, the Defense
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:56 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and
all other organizational entities within
DoD (hereafter referred to collectively as
the ‘‘DoD Components’’).
§ 222.3
Definitions.
Unless otherwise noted, these terms
and their definitions are for the purpose
of this part.
Foreign Government Information
(FGI). Defined in DoD 5200.1–R
(available at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/corres/pdf/520001r.pdf).
Formal Control System. A system
designed to ensure DoD Component
accountability and compliance. For each
MDR request, the system shall contain,
at a minimum, a unique tracking
number, requester’s name and
organizational affiliation, information
requested, date of receipt, and date of
closure.
Formerly Restricted Data. Defined in
DoD 5200.1–R.
MDR. The review of classified
information for declassification in
response to a declassification request
that meets the requirements under
section 3.5 of Executive Order 13526,
‘‘Classified National Security
Information,’’ December 29, 2009.
Restricted Data. Defined in DoD
5200.1–R.
§ 222.4
Responsibilities.
(a) The Director, Washington
Headquarters Services, shall process
MDR requests for OSD, the Office of the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and
the Joint Staff, and DoD Components not
listed in the Appendix A to this part.
(b) Heads of the DoD Components.
The Heads of the DoD Components
listed in the Appendix A to this part
shall:
(1) Establish procedures for the
processing of MDR requests and appeals
for information originating within the
Component.
(2) Appoint an appellate authority to
adjudicate MDR appeals for the
Component.
§ 222.5
MDR processing procedures.
(a) General. The DoD Components
shall process MDR requests from the
public for classified information
originating within the DoD Component
in accordance with DoD 5200.1–R and
32 CFR part 2001.
(b) Information not subject to review
for public release under the MDR
includes:
(1) Unclassified information (to
include documents) or previously
classified documents that are
declassified prior to the receipt of the
MDR request. These documents must be
requested under the provisions of 5
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80745
U.S.C. 552(b) (also known and
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Freedom
of Information Act’’ (FOIA) and 32 CFR
part 286.
(2) Information (to include
documents) reviewed for
declassification within 2 years
preceding the date of receipt of the MDR
request. If this is the case, the requester
shall be provided the documents as
previously released and advised of the
right to appeal to the DoD Component
within 60 days unless the documents
are already under appeal to the
Interagency Security Classification
Appeals Panel (ISCAP).
(3) Information exempted from search
and review by statute of 50 U.S.C. 431,
432, 432a, 432b, and 432d.
(4) Documents originated by the
incumbent President; the incumbent
President’s White House Staff;
committees, commissions, or boards
appointed by the incumbent President;
or other entities within the Executive
Office of the President that solely advise
and assist the incumbent President.
(5) Information marked as Restricted
Data or Formerly Restricted Data.
(6) Information that is the subject of
pending litigation.
(c) MDR Requester Guidelines.
Members of the public seeking the
declassification of DoD documents
under the provisions of section 3.5 of
Executive Order 13526, and 50 U.S.C.
431, 432, 432a, 432b, and 432d shall:
(1) Address the written request to the
appropriate DoD Component listed in
the appendix to this enclosure.
(2) Identify the requested document or
information with sufficient specificity to
enable the DoD Component to locate it
with a reasonable amount of effort.
Information that would provide the
sufficient specificity would include a
document identifier such as originator,
date, title, subject, the National
Archives and Records Administration
accession number, or other applicable
unique document identifying number.
Broad or topical MDR requests for
records on a particular subject, such as
‘‘any and all documents concerning’’ a
subject do not meet this standard.
(3) Include a correct return mailing
address with the request.
(4) Include a statement that the
requester understands that the request
may incur processing charges in
accordance with paragraph (k) of this
section.
(d) Receipt and Control. Upon receipt
of an MDR request, the DoD Component
shall send the requester an
acknowledgement and open a file in a
formal control system. The
acknowledgement shall include the
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
80746
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
tracking number and date of receipt of
the request.
(e) Simultaneous MDR and FOIA
Requests. DoD Components should be
aware of possible requests under both
the MDR and the FOIA. In accordance
with 32 CFR part 286, if a requester asks
for the same information under the
FOIA and the MDR, the DoD
Component shall ask the requester to
select only one process. If the requester
does not select a process, the DoD
Component shall process the requested
information under the FOIA.
(f) MDR Document Review Process. (1)
Requests normally will be processed on
a first in first out basis by date of
receipt.
(2) Every effort shall be made to
ensure that a response to an MDR
request is provided to the requester
within 1 year from the date of receipt.
(3) The DoD Components shall
conduct line-by-line reviews of
documents responsive to an MDR
request to determine if the information
contained within the documents
continues to adhere to the standards for
classification according to Executive
Order 13526 Classified National
Security Information. This line-by-line
review must take into account the
unique sensitivity of FGI as outlined in
paragraph (h) of this section. In
accordance with section 3.6(b) of
Executive Order 13526 Classified
National Security Information, classified
information originating with another
U.S. Government agency contained in
records of the DoD Components will be
referred to the originating agency for a
declassification and release
determination. Likewise, classified
information in a DoD Component’s
records originating with another DoD
Component will be referred to the
originating Component. It is the
responsibility of the DoD Component
originally receiving the MDR request to
manage these referrals and to
incorporate the other agency’s or DoD
Component’s determinations when
preparing the final decision on the
request. The review of each document
will determine if the document:
(i) No longer meets the standards for
classification as established by
Executive Order 13526 ‘‘Classified
National Security Information’’, and is
therefore declassified in full.
(ii) Contains portions still meeting the
standards for classification and is
therefore declassified in part and denied
in part.
(iii) Still meets the standards for
classification in its entirety and is
therefore denied in full.
(4) For documents meeting the criteria
of paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:56 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
this section, the DoD Components shall
not release any unclassified information
exempt from public release pursuant to
Exemptions 2 through 9 of the FOIA.
DoD 5400.7–R, ‘‘DoD Freedom of
Information Act Program’’ provides a
more detailed explanation of the FOIA
exemptions.
(5) When this process is complete, the
DoD Components shall redact all
information, both classified and
unclassified, determined to be exempt
from release as warranted under
applicable law and authority. All of the
remaining information within the
documents, which is determined to be
publicly releasable information, shall be
provided promptly to the requester.
(g) Public Access. In the interest of
transparency, the DoD Components
should make efforts to post documents
released under the MDR program on
DoD Component Web sites.
(h) FGI. Every effort must be made to
ensure that FGI is not subject to
declassification without the prior
consent of the originating government.
Therefore, if a requested document
originated with a foreign government or
organization and was classified by that
government or organization, the DoD
Component shall conduct MDR of the
document in accordance with DoD
5200.1–R and 32 CFR part 2001.
(i) Denial of Information. (1) When
classified information is denied, the
DoD Component shall advise the
requester, in writing:
(i) That information currently and
properly classified has been denied
(whether a document in its entirety or
partially) in accordance with the
appropriate sections of Executive Order
13526 Classified National Security
Information.
(ii) Of the right to appeal the denial
to the DoD Component within 60 days
of receipt of the denial.
(iii) Of the mailing address for the
appellate authority.
(2) When unclassified information is
withheld because it is determined to be
exempt from release pursuant to
Exemptions 2 through 9 of the FOIA
(whether or not classified information
was also withheld within the same
document), the DoD Component shall
advise the requester that:
(i) Section 3.5(c) of Executive Order
13526 Classified National Security
Information allows for the denial of
information when withholding it is
authorized and warranted under
applicable law.
(ii) Unclassified information exempt
from public release pursuant to one or
more exemptions of the FOIA has been
withheld.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3) For the denial of unclassified
information, the requester shall not be
given MDR appeal rights because the
MDR applies only to the denial of
classified information and because the
request was not processed under the
FOIA.
(4) The DoD Component is not
required to confirm or deny the
existence or nonexistence of requested
information whenever the fact of its
existence or nonexistence is itself
classified pursuant to Executive Order
13526 Classified National Security
Information.
(f) MDR Appeals. MDR appeals are for
the denial of classified information
only. DoD Components shall make an
appellate decision within 60 working
days of receipt of an MDR appeal. If
additional time is required to make a
determination, the appellate authority
shall notify the requester of the
additional time needed and provide the
requester with the reason for the
extension. When the appellate review is
complete, the appellate authority shall
notify the requester in writing of the
final determination and of the reasons
for any denial. If the appellate authority
determines that some information
remains classified under the provisions
of Executive Order 13526 Classified
National Security Information, the
requester will be advised of the right to
appeal the final decision to the ISCAP
within 60 days of the final Component
decision, in accordance with section 5.3
of Executive Order 13526 Classified
National Security Information.
(k) FEES. In responding to MDR
requests, the DoD Components may
charge fees as permitted by 32 CFR Part
2001. Fees for search, review, and
reproduction shall be in accordance
with the fee schedule in Appendix 2 of
Chapter 4 of Volume 11A of DoD
7000.14–R (available at https://
comptroller.defense.gov/fmr/11a/
11a_04.pdf).
Appendix A to Part 222—Addressing
MDR Requests
(a) General. The Department of Defense
does not have a central repository for DoD
records. MDR requests therefore should be
addressed to the DoD Component that has
custody of the requested record. If a requester
is not sure which DoD Component has
custody or if the DoD Component is not
listed below, the MDR request should be
directed to the Washington Headquarters
Services in paragraph (b)(1) of this appendix.
(b) DoD Component MDR Addresses:
(1) OSD and the Office of the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff.
Department of Defense, Washington
Headquarters Services, Records and
Declassification Division, Suite 02F09–02,
4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
22350–3100. EXCEPTION: DoD Inspector
General. DoD Office of Inspector General, 400
Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202–
4704.
(2) Department of the Army. U.S. Army
Declassification Activity, Attention: AHRC–
RDD, 8850 Richmond Highway, Suite 300,
Alexandria, VA 22309.
(3) Department of the Navy.
(i) Department of the Navy, Chief of Naval
Operations, CNO N09N2, 2000 Navy
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350–2000.
(Collateral MDR).
(ii) Department of the Navy, Chief of Naval
Operations, CNO N2/N6, 2000 Navy
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350–2000.
(Sensitive Compartmented Information
MDR).
(4) Department of the Air Force.
Department of the Air Force, HAF/IMIO
(MDR), 1000 Air Force Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20330–1000.
(5) United States Marine Corps.
Commandant of the Marine Corps, HQMC
Code PP&O, Security Division (PS), 3000
Marine Corps Pentagon, Room 4A324,
Washington, DC 20350–3000
(6) Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency. Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency, 3701 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203–1714.
(7) Defense Contract Audit Agency.
Director, Defense Contract Audit Agency,
Attention: CPS, 8725 John J. Kingman Road,
Suite 2135, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6219.
(8) Defense Information Systems Agency.
Defense Information Systems Agency,
Attention: Security Division, MPS 6, 5111
Leesburg Pike, Suite 100, Falls Church, VA
22041.
(9) Defense Intelligence Agency. Defense
Intelligence Agency, Attention: DAN–1A
(FOIA), Washington, DC 20340–5100.
(10) Defense Logistics Agency. Defense
Logistics Agency, Attention: DLA/DSS–S,
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort
Belvoir, VA 22060–6221.
(11) Defense Security Service. Defense
Security Service, Office of FOIA & Privacy,
1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314–
1651.
(12) Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Attention:
SCR 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort
Belvoir, VA 22060–6201.
(13) Missile Defense Agency. Missile
Defense Agency, Attention: MDA/DS, 7100
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–
7100.
(14) National Geospatial-Intelligence
Agency. National Geospatial-Intelligence
Agency, Mail Stop D–10, 4600 Sangamore
Road, Bethesda, MD 20816–5003.
(15) National Reconnaissance Office.
National Reconnaissance Office, NRO–MSO–
ASG–IMSC–IART’, 14675 Lee Road,
Chantilly, VA 20151–1715.
(16) National Security Agency/Central
Security Service. National Security Agency,
Declassification Office, DJP5, 9800 Savage
Road, Suite 6884, Fort George G. Meade, MD
20755–6884.
(17) North American Aerospace Defense
Command. HQ NORAD/CSO, 250
Vandenberg St. Ste B016, Peterson AFB, CO
80914.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:56 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
(18) U.S. Africa Command. US Africa
Command, Unit 29951, ATTN: COS–FOIA,
APO AE 09751.
(19) U.S. Central Command. U.S. Central
Command, Attention: CCJ6–RDD, 7115 South
Boundary Blvd., MacDill AFB, FL 33621–
5101.
(20) U.S. European Command. U.S.
European Command, Attention: ECJ1–AX,
Unit 30400, APO AE 09131.
(21) U.S. Joint Forces Command. U.S. Joint
Forces Command, Code J02SM, 1562
Mitscher Ave., Suite 200, Norfolk, VA
23511–2488.
(22) U.S. Northern Command. U.S.
Northern Command, HQ USNORTHCOM/
CSO, 250 Vandenberg Street, Suite B016,
Peterson AFB, CO 80914–3804.
(23) U.S. Pacific Command. U.S. Pacific
Command, Attention: J151 FOIA, Box 64017,
Camp Smith, HI 96861–4017.
(24) U.S. Southern Command. U.S.
Southern Command, Attention: SCJ2–SM–
CFO (FOIA)’’.3511 NW 91st Avenue, Miami,
FL 33172–1217.
(25) U.S. Special Operations Command.
U.S. Special Operations Command,
Attention: SOCS–SJS–SI (FOIA), 7701 Tampa
Point Blvd., MacDill AFB, FL 33621–5323.
(26) U.S. Strategic Command. U.S.
Strategic Command, Attention: CS50, 901
SAC Blvd., STE 1C17, Offutt AFB, NE 68113–
6000.
(27) U.S. Transportation Command. U.S.
Transportation Command, Chief, Command
Information Management, ATTN: TCCSIM,
508 Scott Drive, Scott AFB IL 62225–5357.
(28) Interagency Security Classification
Appeals Panel https://www.archives.gov/isoo/
oversight-groups/iscap/.
(29) Principal Mandatory Declassification
Review (MDR) Contacts at Federal Agencies
https://www.archives.gov/isoo/contact/mdrcontact.html.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33104 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0767, FRL–9494–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Oregon: New
Source Review/Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Rule
Revisions and Air Quality Permit
Streamlining Rule Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve the amendments to the Oregon
State Implementation Plan (SIP) that
were proposed on September 23, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80747
No comments were received on the
proposal and today EPA is taking final
action to approve the proposed SIP
amendments without change. EPA is
approving the SIP submission provided
by the State of Oregon for the purpose
of addressing the third element of the
interstate transport provisions of Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 1997
8-hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS or
standards) and the 1997 and 2006 fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. The
third element of the CAA requires that
a state not interfere with any other
state’s required measures to prevent
significant deterioration (PSD) of its air
quality. EPA is also approving
numerous revisions to the Oregon SIP
that were submitted to EPA by the State
of Oregon on October 8, 2008; October
10, 2008; March 17, 2009; June 23, 2010;
December 22, 2010 and May 5, 2011.
The revisions include updating
Oregon’s new source review (NSR) rules
to be consistent with current Federal
regulations, adding greenhouse gases
(GHGs) to the list of pollutants whose
emissions are subject to control under
the State’s NSR permitting process; and
streamlining Oregon’s air quality rules
by clarifying requirements, removing
duplicative rules, and correcting errors.
The Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)
that EPA promulgated on December 9,
2010, providing for federal
implementation of PSD permitting for
GHGs is also withdrawn as part of this
action because it is being replaced
through the approval of the State’s
regulations providing authority for PSD
permitting of GHG emissions. The
revisions were submitted in accordance
with the requirements of section 110
and part D of the Act. Finally, EPA has
identified a technical error in its most
recent codification of the Oregon SIP
and is making a technical correction to
reinstate text that had been
unintentionally omitted from that
section.
DATES: This action is effective on
January 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R10–OAR–
2011–0767. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80744-80747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33104]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[DOD-2010-OS-0043; RIN 0790-AI62]
32 CFR Part 222
DoD Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Program
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This part implements policy established in DoD Instruction
5200.01. It assigns responsibilities and provides procedures for
members of the public to request a declassification review of
information classified under the provisions of Executive Order 13526,
or predecessor orders.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective January 26, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Storer, (571) 372-0483.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Defense published a
proposed rule on September 27, 2010 (75 FR 59176-59179). Three sets of
comments were received and are addressed below.
Comment 1: As an initial matter, this proposed rule contains no
paragraph (j), and there appears to be no current paragraph (j) to
which this could be referring. While it is entirely reasonable for the
DoD to amend this rule later to cover the issue of fees, it is improper
for the DoD to include a reference now to a potential later amendment
that will itself have to go through the notice and comment rulemaking
procedure. It is far more reasonable to leave this subparagraph out of
the current iteration and add it when the actual paragraph (j) is added
to the rule.
Response 1: Paragraph revised to be consistent with section
2001.33(e) of 32 CFR (see section 222.10).
Comment 2: It is entirely proper that a requester shall not be
given MDR appeal rights for records withheld pursuant to FOIA
exemptions. However, it is not proper for records to be withheld
pursuant to FOIA exemptions as part of the MDR process without
providing the proper appeal rights that accompany all FOIA withholding
decisions.
Response 2: The FOIA and MDR process are separate and distinct
processes. A MDR is not a FOIA Request; a requester does not have the
right to appeal MDR's denied under FOIA exemptions without having filed
a FOIA Request. If a requester is denied under the rules of FOIA, the
requester must submit a FOIA request for those records in order to have
the exemptions examined. (See par 4 and par 5(c)3(d) of section 222.5.)
Comment 3: Proposed Section 222.5(a)(vii) reads as follows: ``This
section shall not apply to any request for a review made to an element
of the Intelligence Community that is made by a person other than an
individual as that term is defined by 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(2), or by a
foreign government entity or any representative thereof.''
This language differs meaningfully from the interpretive guidance
rules in Section 32 CFR 2001.33(i), which say, in part, ``requests for
mandatory declassification review made to an element of the
Intelligence Community by anyone other than a citizen of the United
States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence may be
denied by the receiving Intelligence Community element.''
Response 3: Section removed from final rule.
4: Comments from DoD Internal review of proposed rule:
a. Change the Executive Order in the last line of Paragraph 1 from
12958 to 13526.
b. Appoint an appellate authority and process MDR appeals for
information originating in the OSD, the Office of the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, and DoD components not
listed in the Appendix to Enclosure 2.
c. Insert reference to DoD 5200.1-R so the paragraph reads ``The
DoD Components shall process MDR requests * * * in accordance with DoD
5200.1-R and Part 2001 of title 32 * * *''
d. Replace paragraph 7.b with the following (or similar) statement:
``The DoD Component shall consult with DOS as necessary to determine
whether the information is subject to a treaty or international
agreement that would prevent its declassification. The office to
consult is * * *'' (U//FOUO) The purpose of the statement is to allow
DoD intelligence organizations that have existing, authorized
agreements for coordinating actions on FGI to continue to use those
arrangements with counterpart organizations of foreign governments for
the purposes of coordinating Mandatory Declassification actions.
e. Updated all DoD Component contact information.
Response to Internal Comments: Internal comments from staffing
reviews were incorporated as appropriate. Changes were made in the
following sections: references, paragraph (d), Sec. 222.5 MDR
processing procedures of the final in response to the comments
received.
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 222 does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy; a section of the
economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public
health or safety; or State, local, or tribunal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
these Executive Orders.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 222 does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribunal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year.
[[Page 80745]]
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 222 is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities. The rule implements the procedures for the effective
administration of the DoD MDR Program.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 222 does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 222 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive Order 13132. This rule does not
have substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the National Government and the
States; or
(3) The distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of Government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 222
Declassification, Security information.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 222 is added to read as follows:
PART 222--DOD MANDATORY DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW (MDR) PROGRAM
Sec.
222.1 Purpose.
222.2 Applicability.
222.3 Definitions.
222.4 Responsibilities.
222.5 MDR processing procedures.
Appendix A to Part 222--Addressing MDR requests.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
Sec. 222.1 Purpose.
This part implements policy established in DoD Instruction 5200.01.
It assigns responsibilities and provides procedures for members of the
public to request a declassification review of information classified
under the provisions of Executive Order 13526, or predecessor orders.
Sec. 222.2 Applicability.
This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the
Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies,
the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within
DoD (hereafter referred to collectively as the ``DoD Components'').
Sec. 222.3 Definitions.
Unless otherwise noted, these terms and their definitions are for
the purpose of this part.
Foreign Government Information (FGI). Defined in DoD 5200.1-R
(available at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001r.pdf).
Formal Control System. A system designed to ensure DoD Component
accountability and compliance. For each MDR request, the system shall
contain, at a minimum, a unique tracking number, requester's name and
organizational affiliation, information requested, date of receipt, and
date of closure.
Formerly Restricted Data. Defined in DoD 5200.1-R.
MDR. The review of classified information for declassification in
response to a declassification request that meets the requirements
under section 3.5 of Executive Order 13526, ``Classified National
Security Information,'' December 29, 2009.
Restricted Data. Defined in DoD 5200.1-R.
Sec. 222.4 Responsibilities.
(a) The Director, Washington Headquarters Services, shall process
MDR requests for OSD, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the Joint Staff, and DoD Components not listed in the
Appendix A to this part.
(b) Heads of the DoD Components. The Heads of the DoD Components
listed in the Appendix A to this part shall:
(1) Establish procedures for the processing of MDR requests and
appeals for information originating within the Component.
(2) Appoint an appellate authority to adjudicate MDR appeals for
the Component.
Sec. 222.5 MDR processing procedures.
(a) General. The DoD Components shall process MDR requests from the
public for classified information originating within the DoD Component
in accordance with DoD 5200.1-R and 32 CFR part 2001.
(b) Information not subject to review for public release under the
MDR includes:
(1) Unclassified information (to include documents) or previously
classified documents that are declassified prior to the receipt of the
MDR request. These documents must be requested under the provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552(b) (also known and hereinafter referred to as the
``Freedom of Information Act'' (FOIA) and 32 CFR part 286.
(2) Information (to include documents) reviewed for
declassification within 2 years preceding the date of receipt of the
MDR request. If this is the case, the requester shall be provided the
documents as previously released and advised of the right to appeal to
the DoD Component within 60 days unless the documents are already under
appeal to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel
(ISCAP).
(3) Information exempted from search and review by statute of 50
U.S.C. 431, 432, 432a, 432b, and 432d.
(4) Documents originated by the incumbent President; the incumbent
President's White House Staff; committees, commissions, or boards
appointed by the incumbent President; or other entities within the
Executive Office of the President that solely advise and assist the
incumbent President.
(5) Information marked as Restricted Data or Formerly Restricted
Data.
(6) Information that is the subject of pending litigation.
(c) MDR Requester Guidelines. Members of the public seeking the
declassification of DoD documents under the provisions of section 3.5
of Executive Order 13526, and 50 U.S.C. 431, 432, 432a, 432b, and 432d
shall:
(1) Address the written request to the appropriate DoD Component
listed in the appendix to this enclosure.
(2) Identify the requested document or information with sufficient
specificity to enable the DoD Component to locate it with a reasonable
amount of effort. Information that would provide the sufficient
specificity would include a document identifier such as originator,
date, title, subject, the National Archives and Records Administration
accession number, or other applicable unique document identifying
number. Broad or topical MDR requests for records on a particular
subject, such as ``any and all documents concerning'' a subject do not
meet this standard.
(3) Include a correct return mailing address with the request.
(4) Include a statement that the requester understands that the
request may incur processing charges in accordance with paragraph (k)
of this section.
(d) Receipt and Control. Upon receipt of an MDR request, the DoD
Component shall send the requester an acknowledgement and open a file
in a formal control system. The acknowledgement shall include the
[[Page 80746]]
tracking number and date of receipt of the request.
(e) Simultaneous MDR and FOIA Requests. DoD Components should be
aware of possible requests under both the MDR and the FOIA. In
accordance with 32 CFR part 286, if a requester asks for the same
information under the FOIA and the MDR, the DoD Component shall ask the
requester to select only one process. If the requester does not select
a process, the DoD Component shall process the requested information
under the FOIA.
(f) MDR Document Review Process. (1) Requests normally will be
processed on a first in first out basis by date of receipt.
(2) Every effort shall be made to ensure that a response to an MDR
request is provided to the requester within 1 year from the date of
receipt.
(3) The DoD Components shall conduct line-by-line reviews of
documents responsive to an MDR request to determine if the information
contained within the documents continues to adhere to the standards for
classification according to Executive Order 13526 Classified National
Security Information. This line-by-line review must take into account
the unique sensitivity of FGI as outlined in paragraph (h) of this
section. In accordance with section 3.6(b) of Executive Order 13526
Classified National Security Information, classified information
originating with another U.S. Government agency contained in records of
the DoD Components will be referred to the originating agency for a
declassification and release determination. Likewise, classified
information in a DoD Component's records originating with another DoD
Component will be referred to the originating Component. It is the
responsibility of the DoD Component originally receiving the MDR
request to manage these referrals and to incorporate the other agency's
or DoD Component's determinations when preparing the final decision on
the request. The review of each document will determine if the
document:
(i) No longer meets the standards for classification as established
by Executive Order 13526 ``Classified National Security Information'',
and is therefore declassified in full.
(ii) Contains portions still meeting the standards for
classification and is therefore declassified in part and denied in
part.
(iii) Still meets the standards for classification in its entirety
and is therefore denied in full.
(4) For documents meeting the criteria of paragraphs (f)(3)(i) and
(f)(3)(ii) of this section, the DoD Components shall not release any
unclassified information exempt from public release pursuant to
Exemptions 2 through 9 of the FOIA. DoD 5400.7-R, ``DoD Freedom of
Information Act Program'' provides a more detailed explanation of the
FOIA exemptions.
(5) When this process is complete, the DoD Components shall redact
all information, both classified and unclassified, determined to be
exempt from release as warranted under applicable law and authority.
All of the remaining information within the documents, which is
determined to be publicly releasable information, shall be provided
promptly to the requester.
(g) Public Access. In the interest of transparency, the DoD
Components should make efforts to post documents released under the MDR
program on DoD Component Web sites.
(h) FGI. Every effort must be made to ensure that FGI is not
subject to declassification without the prior consent of the
originating government. Therefore, if a requested document originated
with a foreign government or organization and was classified by that
government or organization, the DoD Component shall conduct MDR of the
document in accordance with DoD 5200.1-R and 32 CFR part 2001.
(i) Denial of Information. (1) When classified information is
denied, the DoD Component shall advise the requester, in writing:
(i) That information currently and properly classified has been
denied (whether a document in its entirety or partially) in accordance
with the appropriate sections of Executive Order 13526 Classified
National Security Information.
(ii) Of the right to appeal the denial to the DoD Component within
60 days of receipt of the denial.
(iii) Of the mailing address for the appellate authority.
(2) When unclassified information is withheld because it is
determined to be exempt from release pursuant to Exemptions 2 through 9
of the FOIA (whether or not classified information was also withheld
within the same document), the DoD Component shall advise the requester
that:
(i) Section 3.5(c) of Executive Order 13526 Classified National
Security Information allows for the denial of information when
withholding it is authorized and warranted under applicable law.
(ii) Unclassified information exempt from public release pursuant
to one or more exemptions of the FOIA has been withheld.
(3) For the denial of unclassified information, the requester shall
not be given MDR appeal rights because the MDR applies only to the
denial of classified information and because the request was not
processed under the FOIA.
(4) The DoD Component is not required to confirm or deny the
existence or nonexistence of requested information whenever the fact of
its existence or nonexistence is itself classified pursuant to
Executive Order 13526 Classified National Security Information.
(f) MDR Appeals. MDR appeals are for the denial of classified
information only. DoD Components shall make an appellate decision
within 60 working days of receipt of an MDR appeal. If additional time
is required to make a determination, the appellate authority shall
notify the requester of the additional time needed and provide the
requester with the reason for the extension. When the appellate review
is complete, the appellate authority shall notify the requester in
writing of the final determination and of the reasons for any denial.
If the appellate authority determines that some information remains
classified under the provisions of Executive Order 13526 Classified
National Security Information, the requester will be advised of the
right to appeal the final decision to the ISCAP within 60 days of the
final Component decision, in accordance with section 5.3 of Executive
Order 13526 Classified National Security Information.
(k) FEES. In responding to MDR requests, the DoD Components may
charge fees as permitted by 32 CFR Part 2001. Fees for search, review,
and reproduction shall be in accordance with the fee schedule in
Appendix 2 of Chapter 4 of Volume 11A of DoD 7000.14-R (available at
https://comptroller.defense.gov/fmr/11a/11a_04.pdf).
Appendix A to Part 222--Addressing MDR Requests
(a) General. The Department of Defense does not have a central
repository for DoD records. MDR requests therefore should be
addressed to the DoD Component that has custody of the requested
record. If a requester is not sure which DoD Component has custody
or if the DoD Component is not listed below, the MDR request should
be directed to the Washington Headquarters Services in paragraph
(b)(1) of this appendix.
(b) DoD Component MDR Addresses:
(1) OSD and the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the Joint Staff. Department of Defense, Washington
Headquarters Services, Records and Declassification Division, Suite
02F09-02, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA
[[Page 80747]]
22350-3100. EXCEPTION: DoD Inspector General. DoD Office of
Inspector General, 400 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202-4704.
(2) Department of the Army. U.S. Army Declassification Activity,
Attention: AHRC-RDD, 8850 Richmond Highway, Suite 300, Alexandria,
VA 22309.
(3) Department of the Navy.
(i) Department of the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations, CNO
N09N2, 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. (Collateral
MDR).
(ii) Department of the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations, CNO N2/
N6, 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. (Sensitive
Compartmented Information MDR).
(4) Department of the Air Force. Department of the Air Force,
HAF/IMIO (MDR), 1000 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1000.
(5) United States Marine Corps. Commandant of the Marine Corps,
HQMC Code PP&O, Security Division (PS), 3000 Marine Corps Pentagon,
Room 4A324, Washington, DC 20350-3000
(6) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency, 3701 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203-1714.
(7) Defense Contract Audit Agency. Director, Defense Contract
Audit Agency, Attention: CPS, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2135,
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6219.
(8) Defense Information Systems Agency. Defense Information
Systems Agency, Attention: Security Division, MPS 6, 5111 Leesburg
Pike, Suite 100, Falls Church, VA 22041.
(9) Defense Intelligence Agency. Defense Intelligence Agency,
Attention: DAN-1A (FOIA), Washington, DC 20340-5100.
(10) Defense Logistics Agency. Defense Logistics Agency,
Attention: DLA/DSS-S, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort
Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.
(11) Defense Security Service. Defense Security Service, Office
of FOIA & Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651.
(12) Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Defense Threat Reduction
Agency, Attention: SCR 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA
22060-6201.
(13) Missile Defense Agency. Missile Defense Agency, Attention:
MDA/DS, 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.
(14) National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Mail Stop D-10, 4600 Sangamore Road,
Bethesda, MD 20816-5003.
(15) National Reconnaissance Office. National Reconnaissance
Office, NRO-MSO-ASG-IMSC-IART', 14675 Lee Road, Chantilly, VA 20151-
1715.
(16) National Security Agency/Central Security Service. National
Security Agency, Declassification Office, DJP5, 9800 Savage Road,
Suite 6884, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6884.
(17) North American Aerospace Defense Command. HQ NORAD/CSO, 250
Vandenberg St. Ste B016, Peterson AFB, CO 80914.
(18) U.S. Africa Command. US Africa Command, Unit 29951, ATTN:
COS-FOIA, APO AE 09751.
(19) U.S. Central Command. U.S. Central Command, Attention:
CCJ6-RDD, 7115 South Boundary Blvd., MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5101.
(20) U.S. European Command. U.S. European Command, Attention:
ECJ1-AX, Unit 30400, APO AE 09131.
(21) U.S. Joint Forces Command. U.S. Joint Forces Command, Code
J02SM, 1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 200, Norfolk, VA 23511-2488.
(22) U.S. Northern Command. U.S. Northern Command, HQ
USNORTHCOM/CSO, 250 Vandenberg Street, Suite B016, Peterson AFB, CO
80914-3804.
(23) U.S. Pacific Command. U.S. Pacific Command, Attention: J151
FOIA, Box 64017, Camp Smith, HI 96861-4017.
(24) U.S. Southern Command. U.S. Southern Command, Attention:
SCJ2-SM-CFO (FOIA)''.3511 NW 91st Avenue, Miami, FL 33172-1217.
(25) U.S. Special Operations Command. U.S. Special Operations
Command, Attention: SOCS-SJS-SI (FOIA), 7701 Tampa Point Blvd.,
MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5323.
(26) U.S. Strategic Command. U.S. Strategic Command, Attention:
CS50, 901 SAC Blvd., STE 1C17, Offutt AFB, NE 68113-6000.
(27) U.S. Transportation Command. U.S. Transportation Command,
Chief, Command Information Management, ATTN: TCCSIM, 508 Scott
Drive, Scott AFB IL 62225-5357.
(28) Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel https://www.archives.gov/isoo/oversight-groups/iscap/.
(29) Principal Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Contacts
at Federal Agencies https://www.archives.gov/isoo/contact/mdr-contact.html.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-33104 Filed 12-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P