TRICARE Evaluation of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Approved Laboratory Developed Tests Demonstration Project, 80905-80907 [2011-33066]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
public to provide, at a minimum,
written comments; fairly balanced
membership; and evaluation of conflicts
of interests for certain members. Section
5(b)(2) of the FACA requires ‘‘* * * the
membership of the advisory committee
to be fairly balanced in terms of the
points of view represented and the
functions to be performed by the
advisory committee.’’
Forward Nominations for
Membership: This notice is a
solicitation to fill a vacancy on the
board. To be considered for nomination
please forward a biography of the
nominee describing the professional
background and qualifications meeting
the above stated criteria. Submissions
may be by email: RFPB@osd.mil, or by
(703) 693–5371 (Facsimile-FAX) to the
Reserve Forces Policy Board’s
Designated Federal Officer no later than
the close of business Friday, January 27,
2012.
Note: Nominees must be U.S. citizens and
cannot be registered federal lobbyists.
Individuals appointed by the Secretary of
Defense to serve on the Reserve Forces Policy
Board will be appointed as experts and
consultants under the authority of 5 U.S.C.
3109 to serve as special governmental
employees and be required to comply with
all Department of Defense ethics
requirements, to include the filing of
confidential financial disclosure statements.
Nominees must hold or be able to qualify for
a security clearance at the Secret level. In
addition, those appointed will serve without
compensation except for travel and per diem
in conjunction with official Board business.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33070 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
TRICARE Evaluation of Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services
Approved Laboratory Developed Tests
Demonstration Project
Department of Defense.
Notice of Demonstration.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice is to advise
interested parties of a Military Health
System (MHS) demonstration project
under the authority of Section 1092,
Chapter 55, Title 10 of the United States
Code (U.S.C.), entitled TRICARE
Evaluation of Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services Approved Laboratory
Developed Tests Demonstration Project.
The demonstration project is intended
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
to determine whether it is feasible for
the Department of Defense (DoD) to
review Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) approved
laboratory developed tests (LDTs), not
yet examined by the United States Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), to
determine if they meet TRICARE
requirements for safety and
effectiveness according to the hierarchy
of reliable evidence (32 CFR 199.2(b))
and allow those that do to be covered
as a benefit under the TRICARE
Program. The LDTs for this
demonstration would be limited to only
those that significantly inform clinical
decision making for surveillance,
surgical interventions, chemotherapy, or
radiation therapy for cancer. The
demonstration project will provide a
valuation of the potential improvement
of the quality of healthcare services for
TRICARE beneficiaries who would not
otherwise had access to these tests. In
addition, the demonstration project will
evaluate the need to modify 32 CFR
199.4(g)(15)(i)(A) to allow coverage for
CMS approved LDTs.
Interested LDT device manufacturers,
or individual (single) laboratories
developing their own proprietary tests
that have a CMS National Coverage
Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage
Determination (LCD) who desire the
DoD to consider their tests for coverage
under the TRICARE Program, are
encouraged to submit LDTs for
consideration. Submissions must
include the LDT description and
complete documentation (including the
CMS-assigned determination number)
proving CMS National Coverage
Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage
Determination (LCD). Submissions will
only be accepted for those LDTs which
are CMS approved, but have not
received FDA clearance or approval
LDTs will be prioritized based on the
combination of potential high
utilization and potential high clinical
impact on TRICARE beneficiaries. If no
submission is received for a LDT and
TMA is aware that a NCD or LCD exists,
TMA may elect to include the LDT in
the prioritization process. Relevant
administrative data on number of
diagnoses of specific oncological
diseases, procedures, treatments, and
other requested data and information
will be used in the prioritization
process. The prioritized list will be sent
to the Director, TMA for approval. The
approved list will then be reviewed in
numerical order beginning with the test
listed as having the highest priority.
Those selected for review will be
evaluated to determine whether they
meet the TRICARE hierarchy of reliable
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80905
evidence for safety and effectiveness as
described in 32 CFR 199.4(g)(15). LDTs
determined to meet TRICARE criteria
for safety and efficacy will be
recommended to the Director, TMA for
approval for cost-sharing during the
demonstration period.
DATES: This demonstration will be
effective 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. This demonstration
will remain in effect for three years.
ADDRESSES: TRICARE Management
Activity (TMA), Office of the Chief
Medical Officer, Attn: HB&RM 5111
Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church,
VA 22041–3206.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Stockdale, Office of the Chief
Medical Officer, TRICARE Management
Activity, telephone (703) 681–0075.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
According to 32 Code of Federal
Regulation (CFR) 199.4(G)(15)(i)(a) the
TRICARE Management Activity (TMA)
may not cost-share medical devices
including laboratory developed tests
(LDTs) if the tests are non-FDA
approved, that is they have not received
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) marketing 510(k) clearance or
premarket approval. Under the current
regulation cited above, LDT’s that have
been identified as non-FDA approved
are summarily denied. In contrast The
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), which is not
constrained by any similar regulation,
has a policy that provides a mechanism
for the review and payment of LDTs
meeting the CMS standard of reasonable
and necessary meaning it is safe and
effective, not experimental or
investigational, and appropriate.
An LDT is a test developed by a single
clinical laboratory that provides testing
to the public but does not sell the lab
kit to other labs. In the past, these tests
were relatively simple tests used to
diagnose or monitor diseases and other
conditions within a single laboratory
usually at a local large hospital or
academic medical center. As a result the
FDA has utilized enforcement discretion
(where the FDA does not enforce some
or all applicable laws and regulations on
certain categories of products) of LDTs
and has taken no action to remove them
from the marketplace.
The 1976 Device Amendments
modified the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to provide for
the regulation of medical devices. These
medical devices are defined broadly in
section 201(h) of 21 U.S.C. 321 to
include: ‘‘an instrument, apparatus,
implement, machine, continuance,
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
80906
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
implant, in vitro reagent, or similar or
related articles, including any
component, part or accessory which is
* * * intended for use in the diagnosis
or disease or other conditions, or in the
cure, mitigation, treatment or
prevention of disease.’’ Medical devices
include laboratory tests also known as
in vitro diagnostics (IVDs).
The FDA authority over IVDs, which
includes LDTs, is defined in 21 CFR
809.33 as: ‘‘those reagents, instruments,
and systems intended for use in
diagnosis of disease or other conditions,
including a determination of the state of
health, in order to cure, mitigate, treat,
or prevent disease or its sequelae. Such
products are intended for use in the
collection, preparation, and
examination of specimens taken from
the human body.’’ The FDA has stated
that clinical laboratories that develop
LDTs are acting as manufacturers of
medical devices and are subject to FDA
jurisdiction under the FFDCA. As noted,
the FDA has chosen to exercise its
‘‘enforcement discretion’’ over many
LDTs and these tests are routinely sold
without FDA approval.
The Analytic Specific Reagents rule
was published in 1997 (21 CFR
864.4020) where FDA regulates the
primary active reagents of laboratory
developed tests rather than the LDTs
themselves. The intent was to ensure
the quality of the test components and
to continue enforcement discretion for
LDTs.
During the 2000’s LDTs were
developed and becoming more complex
at an increasingly fast pace. In response
FDA issued draft guidance relating to In
Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index
Assays, a particularly complex category
of tests in 2007. A final rule has yet to
be published. Recently in July 2011, the
FDA released draft guidance on In Vitro
Companion Diagnostic Devices which
are devices that provide information
that is essential for the safe and effective
use of a corresponding therapeutic
agent.
Laboratories are assessed and
accredited under quality standards set
by CMS under the Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of
1988. CMS regulates laboratories that
use LDTs as well as FDA approved tests.
Laboratories performing moderate or
high complexity tests are subject to
specific regulatory standards governing
certification, personnel, proficiency
testing, patient test management, quality
assurance, quality control, and
inspections. CLIA certification and
periodic inspections ensure the
analytical validity of laboratory tests,
including LDTs. Analytical validity
refers to how well a test performs in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
laboratory; that is how well the test
measures the properties or
characteristics it is intended to measure.
In contrast to TMA, CMS regulations
do not have a specific requirement that
devices be FDA approved. As a result
CMS policy provides a mechanism for
the review and payment of non-FDA
approved LDTs (Section 522 of the
Benefits Improvement and Protection
Act). Non-FDA approved LDTs which
meet CMS’s standards are approved
through its National Coverage
Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage
Determination (LCD) process. Once a
LDT receives a LCD, it is considered a
nationwide Medicare covered benefit.
B. Demonstration Project Description
A demonstration project will be
initiated by the TMA to test whether
CMS approved LDTs which have not
received FDA medical device 510(k)
clearance or premarket approval
(therefore considered non-FDA
approved) are safe and effective for costsharing for TRICARE beneficiaries. The
LDTs for this demonstration would be
limited to only those that significantly
inform clinical decision-making for
surveillance, surgical intervention,
chemotherapy, or radiation therapy for
cancer. The demonstration project will
be effective 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register and will continue
for three years from the effective date of
the original demonstration. The
demonstration project will establish a
process for TRICARE to evaluate the
subset of non-FDA approved LDTs
currently covered by a CMS NCD or
LCD.
Upon publication of this Federal
Register notification, TMA will solicit
submissions from LDT device
manufacturers and individual (single)
laboratories which develop their own
proprietary laboratory developed tests
requests for DoD coverage of their LDTs.
LDTs with current FDA 510(k) clearance
or premarket approval will not be
considered for this demonstration
project; but will continue to be
considered for coverage under the
current routine coverage determination
process of the TRICARE Program.
Submissions must include evidence of
CMS LCD or NCD approval and a
statement from the manufacturer or
laboratory attesting that the LDT has not
received FDA medical device clearance
or approval for marketing. CLIA
certification is also required and a copy
of the certificate should be included. If
a submission is not received for an
eligible LDT, TMA may elect to add the
LDT to the list for consideration; but a
manufacturer should not assume that
their product will be considered
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
without a submission. Submissions will
be accepted for 90 calendar days from
the date of publication of the
demonstration project in the Federal
Register.
All submissions will be reviewed by
the Department of Defense (DoD)
Laboratory Joint Working Group (LJWG),
appointed by the Director, TMA. The
LJWG team will be comprised of
government clinical and policy
professionals (DoD employees or active
duty service members) to include;
medical specialists, clinical laboratory
medicine specialists, and medical
benefits specialists. The LJWG will
prioritize the list of LDTs based on the
potential high utilization and potential
high clinical impact on TRICARE
beneficiaries. Administrative
information from DoD clinical
information systems relating to number
of diagnoses of specific oncological
diseases, procedures, treatments, and
other requested data and information
will be used in the prioritization
process. LDTs used for non-covered
conditions or tests related to unproven
treatments will not be eligible for
coverage and thus will not be
recommended by the LJWG.
The prioritized list will be submitted
to the Director, TMA for approval of the
test as well as its priority placement on
the list. Once an approved list has been
obtained, a health care technology
assessment and review for analytical
validity, clinical validity, and clinical
utility will be conducted. All health
care technology assessments will be
based on the TRICARE hierarchy of
reliable evidence, as defined below, for
criteria for safety and efficacy. CLIA
certification will meet the requirement
of analytical validity. Clinical validity
and clinical utility are defined in the
Agency of Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ) report titled, ‘‘Quality,
Regulation and Clinical Utility of
Laboratory-developed Molecular Tests,
Project ID: LABC0707. In this report
clinical validity is defined as: ‘‘test
characteristics (sensitivity, specificity,
predictive values, and likelihood ratios)
in other words, the accuracy with which
a test predicts the presence or absence
of a clinical condition or predisposition.
Clinical utility is defined as: ‘‘whether
the results of the test can be used to
pursue effective treatment or provide
other concrete clinical benefit,’’ that is
the usefulness of the test and the value
of the information to medical practice.
These standards will be used in
determining if an LDT meets the
requirements for clinical validity and
clinical utility.
The LJWG will conduct a review of
the LDT using the evidence which
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
meets the hierarchy of reliable evidence
as well as the evidence outlined above
which meet the requirements for
analytical validity, and clinical validity
and utility. The definition of reliable
evidence which will be used by the
LJWG is defined in 32 CFR 199.2(b) and
includes: ‘‘(i) Well-controlled trials of
clinically meaningful endpoints,
published in refereed medical literature,
(ii) Published formal technology
assessments, (iii) Published reports of
national medical policy organization
positions, (iv) Published national
professional associations, and (v)
Published reports of national expert
opinion organizations.’’ The hierarchy
of reliable evidence of proven medical
effectiveness, established by (i) through
(v) of this paragraph, is the order of the
relative weight to be given to any
particular source. With respect to
clinical studies, only those reports and
articles containing scientifically valid
data and published in the refereed
medical and scientific literature shall be
considered as meeting the requirements
of reliable evidence. Specifically not
included in the meaning of reliable
evidence are reports, articles, or
statements by providers or groups of
providers containing only abstracts,
anecdotal evidence or personal
professional opinions. Also not
included in the meaning of reliable
evidence is the fact that a provider or a
number of providers have elected to
adopt a drug, device, or medical
treatment or procedure as their personal
treatment or procedure of choice or
standard of practice. By majority vote
the LJWG would recommend approval
or disapproval to the Director, TMA.
Approved LDTs would be available for
cost-sharing with TRICARE
beneficiaries.
C. Final Coverage Decisions
LDTs (evaluated under the
demonstration project) determined by
the JLWG to meet the TRICARE
hierarchy of evidence for safety and
effectiveness will be recommended to
the Director, TMA for decision for
acceptance for cost-sharing during the
demonstration period. LDTs approved
by the Director, TMA for cost-sharing
will follow existing processes for
inclusion as a TRICARE benefit.
Additional information on payment
methodologies will be included in the
operational procedures for this
Demonstration and will be published in
the TRICARE Operations Manual found
at https://manuals.tricare.osd.mil/.
D. Implementation
The demonstration is effective 30
days after publication in the Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
Register and will continue for a period
of three years from the date of the
original demonstration unless
terminated earlier by the Director, TMA.
LDTs approved by the Director, TMA
during the demonstration period will
become available for cost-sharing for
qualified TRICARE beneficiaries during
the demonstration period. Should the
FDA issue final guidance on and or
enforcement of the requirement for prior
marketing approval, the Director TMA
will terminate the demonstration and
the DoD will ensure compliance with
applicable federal law and regulations.
E. Evaluation
An evaluation will be conducted
during the third year of the
demonstration period to determine how
many TRICARE approved LDTs were
provided to beneficiaries across all
TRICARE Regions. The evaluation will
also include a review of the LDT review
and recommendation process. These
results of the evaluation will provide a
valuation of the potential improvement
of the quality of healthcare services for
beneficiaries who would not otherwise
had access to these safe and effective
tests. Based on the utilization results, a
decision will be made to modify 32 CFR
199.4(g)(15)(i)(A) to remove the
restriction for non-FDA approved
devices and allow TRICARE costsharing of CMS approved LDTs
determined to meet the TRICARE
criteria for safety and effectiveness.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33066 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
TRICARE Prime Urgent Care
Demonstration Project
Department of Defense.
Notice of demonstration.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice is to advise
interested parties of a Military Health
System (MHS) Demonstration project
under the authority of title 10, U.S.
Code, section 1092, entitled Department
Of Defense TRICARE Prime Urgent Care
Demonstration Project. The
demonstration project is intended to test
whether allowing four visits to an
urgent care center without requiring a
referral from the Primary Care Manager
(PCM) will improve access to urgent
care including minor illness or injury
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80907
for Active Duty Family Members
enrolled in TRICARE Prime or TRICARE
Prime Remote while reducing the
overall costs of such care to the DoD.
The Department currently has a
demonstration to test this same
provision for U.S. Coast Guard
personnel. However, this demonstration
is being conducted outside of the Coast
Guard population in order to be able to
evaluate the impact on ADFMs who
tend to be a more mobile population
than the Coast Guard members and their
families. Current data indicates that the
ADFMs frequently need urgent care
while traveling to new duty stations for
permanent orders or training and when
traveling to temporary locations while a
member is deployed. Under the
demonstration, ADFMs who are
enrolled in TRICARE Prime or TRICARE
Prime Remote would be allowed to selfrefer, without an authorization, to a
TRICARE network provider such as an
Urgent Care Clinic (UCC) or
Convenience Center for up to four
urgent care visits per year. No referral
from their PCM or authorization by a
Health Care Finder will be required and
no Point of Service (POS) deductibles
and cost shares shall apply to these four
unmanaged visits. The ADFMs will be
required to notify their PCM of any
urgent/acute care visits to other than
their PCM within 24 hours of the visit
and schedule any follow-up treatment
that might be indicated with their PCM.
If more than the four (4) authorized
urgent care visits are used, or if the
beneficiary seeks care from a non
TRICARE network or non TRICARE
authorized provider, POS deductibles
and cost shares as required by Title 32,
Code of Federal Regulations, Section
199.17 (n)(3) may apply. Referral
requirements for specialty care and
inpatient authorizations will remain as
currently required by MHS policy. At
the conclusion of the demonstration,
data will be analyzed to determine if use
of this ability to seek urgent care
without a referral is used more or less
frequently by a more mobile population
than a stable population in order to
determine whether the overall costs to
the government have decreased due to
a reduced usage of emergency care
facilities by this same population.
DATES: This demonstration will be
effective 60 days from the date of this
notice in the Federal Register for a
period of thirty-six (36) months.
ADDRESSES: TRICARE Management
Activity (TMA), Health Plan Operations,
5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls
Church, VA 22041.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions pertaining to this
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80905-80907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33066]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
TRICARE Evaluation of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Approved Laboratory Developed Tests Demonstration Project
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of Demonstration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is to advise interested parties of a Military
Health System (MHS) demonstration project under the authority of
Section 1092, Chapter 55, Title 10 of the United States Code (U.S.C.),
entitled TRICARE Evaluation of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Approved Laboratory Developed Tests Demonstration Project. The
demonstration project is intended to determine whether it is feasible
for the Department of Defense (DoD) to review Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) approved laboratory developed tests (LDTs), not
yet examined by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
to determine if they meet TRICARE requirements for safety and
effectiveness according to the hierarchy of reliable evidence (32 CFR
199.2(b)) and allow those that do to be covered as a benefit under the
TRICARE Program. The LDTs for this demonstration would be limited to
only those that significantly inform clinical decision making for
surveillance, surgical interventions, chemotherapy, or radiation
therapy for cancer. The demonstration project will provide a valuation
of the potential improvement of the quality of healthcare services for
TRICARE beneficiaries who would not otherwise had access to these
tests. In addition, the demonstration project will evaluate the need to
modify 32 CFR 199.4(g)(15)(i)(A) to allow coverage for CMS approved
LDTs.
Interested LDT device manufacturers, or individual (single)
laboratories developing their own proprietary tests that have a CMS
National Coverage Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage Determination
(LCD) who desire the DoD to consider their tests for coverage under the
TRICARE Program, are encouraged to submit LDTs for consideration.
Submissions must include the LDT description and complete documentation
(including the CMS-assigned determination number) proving CMS National
Coverage Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage Determination (LCD).
Submissions will only be accepted for those LDTs which are CMS
approved, but have not received FDA clearance or approval LDTs will be
prioritized based on the combination of potential high utilization and
potential high clinical impact on TRICARE beneficiaries. If no
submission is received for a LDT and TMA is aware that a NCD or LCD
exists, TMA may elect to include the LDT in the prioritization process.
Relevant administrative data on number of diagnoses of specific
oncological diseases, procedures, treatments, and other requested data
and information will be used in the prioritization process. The
prioritized list will be sent to the Director, TMA for approval. The
approved list will then be reviewed in numerical order beginning with
the test listed as having the highest priority. Those selected for
review will be evaluated to determine whether they meet the TRICARE
hierarchy of reliable evidence for safety and effectiveness as
described in 32 CFR 199.4(g)(15). LDTs determined to meet TRICARE
criteria for safety and efficacy will be recommended to the Director,
TMA for approval for cost-sharing during the demonstration period.
DATES: This demonstration will be effective 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register. This demonstration will remain in effect for
three years.
ADDRESSES: TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), Office of the Chief
Medical Officer, Attn: HB&RM 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls
Church, VA 22041-3206.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Stockdale, Office of the Chief
Medical Officer, TRICARE Management Activity, telephone (703) 681-0075.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
According to 32 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 199.4(G)(15)(i)(a)
the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA) may not cost-share medical
devices including laboratory developed tests (LDTs) if the tests are
non-FDA approved, that is they have not received U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) marketing 510(k) clearance or premarket approval.
Under the current regulation cited above, LDT's that have been
identified as non-FDA approved are summarily denied. In contrast The
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which is not
constrained by any similar regulation, has a policy that provides a
mechanism for the review and payment of LDTs meeting the CMS standard
of reasonable and necessary meaning it is safe and effective, not
experimental or investigational, and appropriate.
An LDT is a test developed by a single clinical laboratory that
provides testing to the public but does not sell the lab kit to other
labs. In the past, these tests were relatively simple tests used to
diagnose or monitor diseases and other conditions within a single
laboratory usually at a local large hospital or academic medical
center. As a result the FDA has utilized enforcement discretion (where
the FDA does not enforce some or all applicable laws and regulations on
certain categories of products) of LDTs and has taken no action to
remove them from the marketplace.
The 1976 Device Amendments modified the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to provide for the regulation of medical devices.
These medical devices are defined broadly in section 201(h) of 21
U.S.C. 321 to include: ``an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine,
continuance,
[[Page 80906]]
implant, in vitro reagent, or similar or related articles, including
any component, part or accessory which is * * * intended for use in the
diagnosis or disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation,
treatment or prevention of disease.'' Medical devices include
laboratory tests also known as in vitro diagnostics (IVDs).
The FDA authority over IVDs, which includes LDTs, is defined in 21
CFR 809.33 as: ``those reagents, instruments, and systems intended for
use in diagnosis of disease or other conditions, including a
determination of the state of health, in order to cure, mitigate,
treat, or prevent disease or its sequelae. Such products are intended
for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens
taken from the human body.'' The FDA has stated that clinical
laboratories that develop LDTs are acting as manufacturers of medical
devices and are subject to FDA jurisdiction under the FFDCA. As noted,
the FDA has chosen to exercise its ``enforcement discretion'' over many
LDTs and these tests are routinely sold without FDA approval.
The Analytic Specific Reagents rule was published in 1997 (21 CFR
864.4020) where FDA regulates the primary active reagents of laboratory
developed tests rather than the LDTs themselves. The intent was to
ensure the quality of the test components and to continue enforcement
discretion for LDTs.
During the 2000's LDTs were developed and becoming more complex at
an increasingly fast pace. In response FDA issued draft guidance
relating to In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays, a
particularly complex category of tests in 2007. A final rule has yet to
be published. Recently in July 2011, the FDA released draft guidance on
In Vitro Companion Diagnostic Devices which are devices that provide
information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a
corresponding therapeutic agent.
Laboratories are assessed and accredited under quality standards
set by CMS under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)
of 1988. CMS regulates laboratories that use LDTs as well as FDA
approved tests. Laboratories performing moderate or high complexity
tests are subject to specific regulatory standards governing
certification, personnel, proficiency testing, patient test management,
quality assurance, quality control, and inspections. CLIA certification
and periodic inspections ensure the analytical validity of laboratory
tests, including LDTs. Analytical validity refers to how well a test
performs in the laboratory; that is how well the test measures the
properties or characteristics it is intended to measure.
In contrast to TMA, CMS regulations do not have a specific
requirement that devices be FDA approved. As a result CMS policy
provides a mechanism for the review and payment of non-FDA approved
LDTs (Section 522 of the Benefits Improvement and Protection Act). Non-
FDA approved LDTs which meet CMS's standards are approved through its
National Coverage Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage Determination
(LCD) process. Once a LDT receives a LCD, it is considered a nationwide
Medicare covered benefit.
B. Demonstration Project Description
A demonstration project will be initiated by the TMA to test
whether CMS approved LDTs which have not received FDA medical device
510(k) clearance or premarket approval (therefore considered non-FDA
approved) are safe and effective for cost-sharing for TRICARE
beneficiaries. The LDTs for this demonstration would be limited to only
those that significantly inform clinical decision-making for
surveillance, surgical intervention, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy
for cancer. The demonstration project will be effective 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register and will continue for three years
from the effective date of the original demonstration. The
demonstration project will establish a process for TRICARE to evaluate
the subset of non-FDA approved LDTs currently covered by a CMS NCD or
LCD.
Upon publication of this Federal Register notification, TMA will
solicit submissions from LDT device manufacturers and individual
(single) laboratories which develop their own proprietary laboratory
developed tests requests for DoD coverage of their LDTs. LDTs with
current FDA 510(k) clearance or premarket approval will not be
considered for this demonstration project; but will continue to be
considered for coverage under the current routine coverage
determination process of the TRICARE Program. Submissions must include
evidence of CMS LCD or NCD approval and a statement from the
manufacturer or laboratory attesting that the LDT has not received FDA
medical device clearance or approval for marketing. CLIA certification
is also required and a copy of the certificate should be included. If a
submission is not received for an eligible LDT, TMA may elect to add
the LDT to the list for consideration; but a manufacturer should not
assume that their product will be considered without a submission.
Submissions will be accepted for 90 calendar days from the date of
publication of the demonstration project in the Federal Register.
All submissions will be reviewed by the Department of Defense (DoD)
Laboratory Joint Working Group (LJWG), appointed by the Director, TMA.
The LJWG team will be comprised of government clinical and policy
professionals (DoD employees or active duty service members) to
include; medical specialists, clinical laboratory medicine specialists,
and medical benefits specialists. The LJWG will prioritize the list of
LDTs based on the potential high utilization and potential high
clinical impact on TRICARE beneficiaries. Administrative information
from DoD clinical information systems relating to number of diagnoses
of specific oncological diseases, procedures, treatments, and other
requested data and information will be used in the prioritization
process. LDTs used for non-covered conditions or tests related to
unproven treatments will not be eligible for coverage and thus will not
be recommended by the LJWG.
The prioritized list will be submitted to the Director, TMA for
approval of the test as well as its priority placement on the list.
Once an approved list has been obtained, a health care technology
assessment and review for analytical validity, clinical validity, and
clinical utility will be conducted. All health care technology
assessments will be based on the TRICARE hierarchy of reliable
evidence, as defined below, for criteria for safety and efficacy. CLIA
certification will meet the requirement of analytical validity.
Clinical validity and clinical utility are defined in the Agency of
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) report titled, ``Quality,
Regulation and Clinical Utility of Laboratory-developed Molecular
Tests, Project ID: LABC0707. In this report clinical validity is
defined as: ``test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity,
predictive values, and likelihood ratios) in other words, the accuracy
with which a test predicts the presence or absence of a clinical
condition or predisposition. Clinical utility is defined as: ``whether
the results of the test can be used to pursue effective treatment or
provide other concrete clinical benefit,'' that is the usefulness of
the test and the value of the information to medical practice. These
standards will be used in determining if an LDT meets the requirements
for clinical validity and clinical utility.
The LJWG will conduct a review of the LDT using the evidence which
[[Page 80907]]
meets the hierarchy of reliable evidence as well as the evidence
outlined above which meet the requirements for analytical validity, and
clinical validity and utility. The definition of reliable evidence
which will be used by the LJWG is defined in 32 CFR 199.2(b) and
includes: ``(i) Well-controlled trials of clinically meaningful
endpoints, published in refereed medical literature, (ii) Published
formal technology assessments, (iii) Published reports of national
medical policy organization positions, (iv) Published national
professional associations, and (v) Published reports of national expert
opinion organizations.'' The hierarchy of reliable evidence of proven
medical effectiveness, established by (i) through (v) of this
paragraph, is the order of the relative weight to be given to any
particular source. With respect to clinical studies, only those reports
and articles containing scientifically valid data and published in the
refereed medical and scientific literature shall be considered as
meeting the requirements of reliable evidence. Specifically not
included in the meaning of reliable evidence are reports, articles, or
statements by providers or groups of providers containing only
abstracts, anecdotal evidence or personal professional opinions. Also
not included in the meaning of reliable evidence is the fact that a
provider or a number of providers have elected to adopt a drug, device,
or medical treatment or procedure as their personal treatment or
procedure of choice or standard of practice. By majority vote the LJWG
would recommend approval or disapproval to the Director, TMA. Approved
LDTs would be available for cost-sharing with TRICARE beneficiaries.
C. Final Coverage Decisions
LDTs (evaluated under the demonstration project) determined by the
JLWG to meet the TRICARE hierarchy of evidence for safety and
effectiveness will be recommended to the Director, TMA for decision for
acceptance for cost-sharing during the demonstration period. LDTs
approved by the Director, TMA for cost-sharing will follow existing
processes for inclusion as a TRICARE benefit. Additional information on
payment methodologies will be included in the operational procedures
for this Demonstration and will be published in the TRICARE Operations
Manual found at https://manuals.tricare.osd.mil/.
D. Implementation
The demonstration is effective 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register and will continue for a period of three years from the
date of the original demonstration unless terminated earlier by the
Director, TMA. LDTs approved by the Director, TMA during the
demonstration period will become available for cost-sharing for
qualified TRICARE beneficiaries during the demonstration period. Should
the FDA issue final guidance on and or enforcement of the requirement
for prior marketing approval, the Director TMA will terminate the
demonstration and the DoD will ensure compliance with applicable
federal law and regulations.
E. Evaluation
An evaluation will be conducted during the third year of the
demonstration period to determine how many TRICARE approved LDTs were
provided to beneficiaries across all TRICARE Regions. The evaluation
will also include a review of the LDT review and recommendation
process. These results of the evaluation will provide a valuation of
the potential improvement of the quality of healthcare services for
beneficiaries who would not otherwise had access to these safe and
effective tests. Based on the utilization results, a decision will be
made to modify 32 CFR 199.4(g)(15)(i)(A) to remove the restriction for
non-FDA approved devices and allow TRICARE cost-sharing of CMS approved
LDTs determined to meet the TRICARE criteria for safety and
effectiveness.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-33066 Filed 12-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P