TRICARE Prime Urgent Care Demonstration Project, 80907-80908 [2011-33065]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
meets the hierarchy of reliable evidence
as well as the evidence outlined above
which meet the requirements for
analytical validity, and clinical validity
and utility. The definition of reliable
evidence which will be used by the
LJWG is defined in 32 CFR 199.2(b) and
includes: ‘‘(i) Well-controlled trials of
clinically meaningful endpoints,
published in refereed medical literature,
(ii) Published formal technology
assessments, (iii) Published reports of
national medical policy organization
positions, (iv) Published national
professional associations, and (v)
Published reports of national expert
opinion organizations.’’ The hierarchy
of reliable evidence of proven medical
effectiveness, established by (i) through
(v) of this paragraph, is the order of the
relative weight to be given to any
particular source. With respect to
clinical studies, only those reports and
articles containing scientifically valid
data and published in the refereed
medical and scientific literature shall be
considered as meeting the requirements
of reliable evidence. Specifically not
included in the meaning of reliable
evidence are reports, articles, or
statements by providers or groups of
providers containing only abstracts,
anecdotal evidence or personal
professional opinions. Also not
included in the meaning of reliable
evidence is the fact that a provider or a
number of providers have elected to
adopt a drug, device, or medical
treatment or procedure as their personal
treatment or procedure of choice or
standard of practice. By majority vote
the LJWG would recommend approval
or disapproval to the Director, TMA.
Approved LDTs would be available for
cost-sharing with TRICARE
beneficiaries.
C. Final Coverage Decisions
LDTs (evaluated under the
demonstration project) determined by
the JLWG to meet the TRICARE
hierarchy of evidence for safety and
effectiveness will be recommended to
the Director, TMA for decision for
acceptance for cost-sharing during the
demonstration period. LDTs approved
by the Director, TMA for cost-sharing
will follow existing processes for
inclusion as a TRICARE benefit.
Additional information on payment
methodologies will be included in the
operational procedures for this
Demonstration and will be published in
the TRICARE Operations Manual found
at https://manuals.tricare.osd.mil/.
D. Implementation
The demonstration is effective 30
days after publication in the Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
Register and will continue for a period
of three years from the date of the
original demonstration unless
terminated earlier by the Director, TMA.
LDTs approved by the Director, TMA
during the demonstration period will
become available for cost-sharing for
qualified TRICARE beneficiaries during
the demonstration period. Should the
FDA issue final guidance on and or
enforcement of the requirement for prior
marketing approval, the Director TMA
will terminate the demonstration and
the DoD will ensure compliance with
applicable federal law and regulations.
E. Evaluation
An evaluation will be conducted
during the third year of the
demonstration period to determine how
many TRICARE approved LDTs were
provided to beneficiaries across all
TRICARE Regions. The evaluation will
also include a review of the LDT review
and recommendation process. These
results of the evaluation will provide a
valuation of the potential improvement
of the quality of healthcare services for
beneficiaries who would not otherwise
had access to these safe and effective
tests. Based on the utilization results, a
decision will be made to modify 32 CFR
199.4(g)(15)(i)(A) to remove the
restriction for non-FDA approved
devices and allow TRICARE costsharing of CMS approved LDTs
determined to meet the TRICARE
criteria for safety and effectiveness.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33066 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
TRICARE Prime Urgent Care
Demonstration Project
Department of Defense.
Notice of demonstration.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice is to advise
interested parties of a Military Health
System (MHS) Demonstration project
under the authority of title 10, U.S.
Code, section 1092, entitled Department
Of Defense TRICARE Prime Urgent Care
Demonstration Project. The
demonstration project is intended to test
whether allowing four visits to an
urgent care center without requiring a
referral from the Primary Care Manager
(PCM) will improve access to urgent
care including minor illness or injury
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80907
for Active Duty Family Members
enrolled in TRICARE Prime or TRICARE
Prime Remote while reducing the
overall costs of such care to the DoD.
The Department currently has a
demonstration to test this same
provision for U.S. Coast Guard
personnel. However, this demonstration
is being conducted outside of the Coast
Guard population in order to be able to
evaluate the impact on ADFMs who
tend to be a more mobile population
than the Coast Guard members and their
families. Current data indicates that the
ADFMs frequently need urgent care
while traveling to new duty stations for
permanent orders or training and when
traveling to temporary locations while a
member is deployed. Under the
demonstration, ADFMs who are
enrolled in TRICARE Prime or TRICARE
Prime Remote would be allowed to selfrefer, without an authorization, to a
TRICARE network provider such as an
Urgent Care Clinic (UCC) or
Convenience Center for up to four
urgent care visits per year. No referral
from their PCM or authorization by a
Health Care Finder will be required and
no Point of Service (POS) deductibles
and cost shares shall apply to these four
unmanaged visits. The ADFMs will be
required to notify their PCM of any
urgent/acute care visits to other than
their PCM within 24 hours of the visit
and schedule any follow-up treatment
that might be indicated with their PCM.
If more than the four (4) authorized
urgent care visits are used, or if the
beneficiary seeks care from a non
TRICARE network or non TRICARE
authorized provider, POS deductibles
and cost shares as required by Title 32,
Code of Federal Regulations, Section
199.17 (n)(3) may apply. Referral
requirements for specialty care and
inpatient authorizations will remain as
currently required by MHS policy. At
the conclusion of the demonstration,
data will be analyzed to determine if use
of this ability to seek urgent care
without a referral is used more or less
frequently by a more mobile population
than a stable population in order to
determine whether the overall costs to
the government have decreased due to
a reduced usage of emergency care
facilities by this same population.
DATES: This demonstration will be
effective 60 days from the date of this
notice in the Federal Register for a
period of thirty-six (36) months.
ADDRESSES: TRICARE Management
Activity (TMA), Health Plan Operations,
5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls
Church, VA 22041.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions pertaining to this
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
80908
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 2011 / Notices
demonstration project, please contact
Ms. Shane Pham at (703) 681–0039.
we consider the ADFMs’ use of ERs to
be too high.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
b. Implementation
This demonstration will be effective
60 days from the date of this notice in
the Federal Register for a period of
thirty-six (36) months.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
a. Background
Access for acute episodic primary
care continues to be in high demand by
TRICARE Prime beneficiaries. The
current regulations require that if a
Prime beneficiary seeks care from a
provider other than their Primary Care
Manager (PCM), they must first obtain a
referral. Otherwise, the care will be
covered under the point-of-service
option at greater out-of-pocket cost to
the Prime beneficiary. This includes
urgent care which TRICARE defines as
medically necessary treatment for an
illness or injury that would not result in
further disability or death if not treated
immediately but that requires
professional attention within 24 hours.
On the other hand, emergency care
defined as a medical, maternity or
psychiatric condition that would lead a
‘‘prudent layperson’’ (someone with
average knowledge of health and
medicine) to believe that a serious
medical condition existed, or the
absence of medical attention would
result in a threat to his or her life, limb
or sight and requires immediate medical
treatment or which has painful
symptoms requiring immediate
attention to relieve suffering, does not
require an authorization. Often when a
Prime beneficiary needs urgent care
after hours or when the PCM does not
have available appointments, the Prime
beneficiary will seek care from civilian
sources such as emergency rooms (ER).
While many Prime beneficiaries pay no
out-of pocket costs for ER services, the
average cost for an ER visit is much
higher than an urgent care visit. In many
cases, using the ER is not necessary, and
a patient’s condition can be treated
through urgent care. Additionally for
our ADFMs in transition, the
Department has seen a higher incident
of ER usage by this population. It
appears that the difficulty in contacting
the PMS while traveling or in a new
location may result in the beneficiary’s
higher hospital ER services for care that
might be suitably be obtained at an
urgent care center.
In 2010, we examined the degree to
which ADFMs used ERs for the top 14
medical conditions for which they
sought care. We found that ADFM
military treatment facility enrollees
received about 7 percent of their visits
from ERs while civilian prime enrollees
received 4 percent of their care from
emergency rooms. Because many of the
top 14 conditions are acute in nature,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:00 Dec 23, 2011
Jkt 226001
c. Evaluation
The results of this Demonstration will
allow a focused study of the impact of
this process on: (1) The reduction of ER
utilization and resulting costs, (2)
assessment of the availability and
accessibility of less expensive acute care
services such as UCCs, (3) reduction of
administrative processes. The
evaluation/analysis of the
demonstration would use Fiscal Year
2011 as the base line with follow-up
data analysis conducted at each 6month interval throughout the 36 month
period to monitor of ER and TRICARE
authorized UCC utilization workload
and cost (claims data). Success of the
demonstration would be determined by
consistent shifts in health care
utilization from ERs to a TRICARE
authorized UCCs by 15–20%. A less
than 5% shift in utilization from the ER
to a TRICARE authorized UCCs would
be considered insignificant.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–33065 Filed 12–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
[Docket ID USA–2007–0014]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Army Corps of Engineers,
Engineer Research and Development
Center/Construction Engineering
Research Laboratory (ERDC/CERL),
DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers—ERDC/CERL
announces a proposed new public
information collection and seeks public
comment on the provisions thereof.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by February 27,
2012.
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to: Larry Pater, Ph.D., P.E.,
Program/Project Manager, Noise R&D,
U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center (ERDC),
Construction Engineering Research
Laboratory (CERL), 2902 Farber Drive,
Champaign, IL 61821.
Title and OMB Number: Assessing
Human Response to Military Impulse
Noise; OMB Control Number 0710—
0015.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection requirement is necessary to
obtain information on the relationship
between community annoyance and
complaints, related to impulsive noise
from military installations. The
information will provide the necessary
tools and guidance for military
installations to effectively balance the
need for training operations at military
installations with public safety and
welfare. Participation by respondents is
strictly voluntary, and the surveys are
intended solely (or primarily) to ensure
that facilities can adequately respond to
any concerns the public may have.
Affected Public: Individuals and
households.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80907-80908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33065]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
TRICARE Prime Urgent Care Demonstration Project
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of demonstration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is to advise interested parties of a Military
Health System (MHS) Demonstration project under the authority of title
10, U.S. Code, section 1092, entitled Department Of Defense TRICARE
Prime Urgent Care Demonstration Project. The demonstration project is
intended to test whether allowing four visits to an urgent care center
without requiring a referral from the Primary Care Manager (PCM) will
improve access to urgent care including minor illness or injury for
Active Duty Family Members enrolled in TRICARE Prime or TRICARE Prime
Remote while reducing the overall costs of such care to the DoD. The
Department currently has a demonstration to test this same provision
for U.S. Coast Guard personnel. However, this demonstration is being
conducted outside of the Coast Guard population in order to be able to
evaluate the impact on ADFMs who tend to be a more mobile population
than the Coast Guard members and their families. Current data indicates
that the ADFMs frequently need urgent care while traveling to new duty
stations for permanent orders or training and when traveling to
temporary locations while a member is deployed. Under the
demonstration, ADFMs who are enrolled in TRICARE Prime or TRICARE Prime
Remote would be allowed to self-refer, without an authorization, to a
TRICARE network provider such as an Urgent Care Clinic (UCC) or
Convenience Center for up to four urgent care visits per year. No
referral from their PCM or authorization by a Health Care Finder will
be required and no Point of Service (POS) deductibles and cost shares
shall apply to these four unmanaged visits. The ADFMs will be required
to notify their PCM of any urgent/acute care visits to other than their
PCM within 24 hours of the visit and schedule any follow-up treatment
that might be indicated with their PCM. If more than the four (4)
authorized urgent care visits are used, or if the beneficiary seeks
care from a non TRICARE network or non TRICARE authorized provider, POS
deductibles and cost shares as required by Title 32, Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 199.17 (n)(3) may apply. Referral requirements for
specialty care and inpatient authorizations will remain as currently
required by MHS policy. At the conclusion of the demonstration, data
will be analyzed to determine if use of this ability to seek urgent
care without a referral is used more or less frequently by a more
mobile population than a stable population in order to determine
whether the overall costs to the government have decreased due to a
reduced usage of emergency care facilities by this same population.
DATES: This demonstration will be effective 60 days from the date of
this notice in the Federal Register for a period of thirty-six (36)
months.
ADDRESSES: TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), Health Plan Operations,
5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, VA 22041.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions pertaining to this
[[Page 80908]]
demonstration project, please contact Ms. Shane Pham at (703) 681-0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
a. Background
Access for acute episodic primary care continues to be in high
demand by TRICARE Prime beneficiaries. The current regulations require
that if a Prime beneficiary seeks care from a provider other than their
Primary Care Manager (PCM), they must first obtain a referral.
Otherwise, the care will be covered under the point-of-service option
at greater out-of-pocket cost to the Prime beneficiary. This includes
urgent care which TRICARE defines as medically necessary treatment for
an illness or injury that would not result in further disability or
death if not treated immediately but that requires professional
attention within 24 hours. On the other hand, emergency care defined as
a medical, maternity or psychiatric condition that would lead a
``prudent layperson'' (someone with average knowledge of health and
medicine) to believe that a serious medical condition existed, or the
absence of medical attention would result in a threat to his or her
life, limb or sight and requires immediate medical treatment or which
has painful symptoms requiring immediate attention to relieve
suffering, does not require an authorization. Often when a Prime
beneficiary needs urgent care after hours or when the PCM does not have
available appointments, the Prime beneficiary will seek care from
civilian sources such as emergency rooms (ER). While many Prime
beneficiaries pay no out-of pocket costs for ER services, the average
cost for an ER visit is much higher than an urgent care visit. In many
cases, using the ER is not necessary, and a patient's condition can be
treated through urgent care. Additionally for our ADFMs in transition,
the Department has seen a higher incident of ER usage by this
population. It appears that the difficulty in contacting the PMS while
traveling or in a new location may result in the beneficiary's higher
hospital ER services for care that might be suitably be obtained at an
urgent care center.
In 2010, we examined the degree to which ADFMs used ERs for the top
14 medical conditions for which they sought care. We found that ADFM
military treatment facility enrollees received about 7 percent of their
visits from ERs while civilian prime enrollees received 4 percent of
their care from emergency rooms. Because many of the top 14 conditions
are acute in nature, we consider the ADFMs' use of ERs to be too high.
b. Implementation
This demonstration will be effective 60 days from the date of this
notice in the Federal Register for a period of thirty-six (36) months.
c. Evaluation
The results of this Demonstration will allow a focused study of the
impact of this process on: (1) The reduction of ER utilization and
resulting costs, (2) assessment of the availability and accessibility
of less expensive acute care services such as UCCs, (3) reduction of
administrative processes. The evaluation/analysis of the demonstration
would use Fiscal Year 2011 as the base line with follow-up data
analysis conducted at each 6-month interval throughout the 36 month
period to monitor of ER and TRICARE authorized UCC utilization workload
and cost (claims data). Success of the demonstration would be
determined by consistent shifts in health care utilization from ERs to
a TRICARE authorized UCCs by 15-20%. A less than 5% shift in
utilization from the ER to a TRICARE authorized UCCs would be
considered insignificant.
Dated: December 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-33065 Filed 12-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P