Special Local Regulations; Patriot Challenge Kayak Race, Ashley River, Charleston, SC, 79571-79574 [2011-32850]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Proposed Rules
D. Every felony of which the
applicant has been convicted or any
ongoing prosecution.
(iv) A copy of the eligibility
determination made under § 556.5 of
this part.
§ 556.7
Notice.
(a) All notices under this part shall be
provided to the Commission through the
appropriate Regional office.
(b) Should a tribe wish to submit
notices electronically, it should contact
the appropriate Regional office for
guidance on acceptable document
formats and means of transmission.
§ 556.8
Compliance with this part.
All tribal gaming ordinances and
ordinance amendments approved by the
Chair prior to the effective date of this
part and that reference this part, do not
need to be amended to comply with this
part. All future ordinance submissions,
however, must comply.
2. Revise Part 558 to read as follows:
PART 558—GAMING LICENSES FOR
KEY EMPLOYEES AND PRIMARY
MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS
Sec.
558.1 Scope of this part.
558.2 Review of notice of results for a key
employee or primary management
official.
558.3 Notification to NIGC of license
issuance and retention obligations.
558.4 Notice of disqualifying information
and licensee right to a hearing.
558.5 Submission of notices.
558.6 Compliance with this part.
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706, 2710, 2712.
§ 558.1
Scope of this part.
Unless a tribal-state compact assigns
responsibility to an entity other than a
tribe, the licensing authority for class II
or class III gaming is a tribal authority.
The procedures and standards of this
part apply only to licenses for primary
management officials and key
employees. This part does not apply to
any license that is intended to expire
within 90 days of issuance.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 558.2 Review of notice of results for a
key employee or primary management
official.
(a) Upon receipt of a complete notice
of results for a key employee or primary
management official as required by 25
CFR 556.6(b)(2), the Chair has 30 days
to request additional information from a
tribe concerning the applicant or
licensee and to object.
(b) If the Commission has no objection
to issuance of a license, it shall notify
the tribe within thirty (30) days of
receiving notice of results pursuant to
§ 556.6(b)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:15 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
(c) If, within the 30 day period
described in § 558.3(a) of this part, the
Commission provides the tribe with a
statement itemizing objections to the
issuance of a license to a key employee
or to a primary management official
applicant for whom the tribe has
provided a notice of results, the tribe
shall reconsider the application, taking
into account the objections itemized by
the Commission. The tribe shall make
the final decision whether to issue a
license to such applicant.
(d) If the tribe has issued the license
before receiving the Commission’s
statement of objections, notice and
hearing shall be provided to the licensee
as provided by § 558.4.
§ 558.3 Notification to NIGC of license
issuance and retention obligations.
(a) After a tribe has provided a notice
of results of the background check to the
Commission, a tribe may license a
primary management official or key
employee.
(b) A gaming operation shall not
employ a key employee or primary
management official who does not have
a license after ninety (90) days.
(c) If a tribe does not license an
applicant—
(1) The tribe shall notify the
Commission; and
(2) Shall forward copies of its
eligibility determination under this
section and investigative report (if any)
under § 556.6(b)(1) to the Commission
for inclusion in the Indian Gaming
Individuals Record System.
(d) Within 30 days after the issuance
of the license, a tribe shall notify the
Commission of its issuance.
(e) A tribe shall retain the following
for inspection by the Chair or his or her
designee for no less than three years
from the date of termination of
employment:
(1) Applications for licensing;
(2) Investigative reports; and
(3) Eligibility determinations.
79571
(c) A tribe shall notify the licensee of
a time and a place for a hearing on the
proposed revocation of a license.
(d) A right to a hearing under this part
shall vest only upon receipt of a license
granted under an ordinance approved
by the Chair.
(e) After a revocation hearing, a tribe
shall decide to revoke or to reinstate a
gaming license. A tribe shall notify the
Commission of its decision within 45
days of receiving notification from the
Commission pursuant to subsection (a).
§ 558.5
Submission of notices.
(a) All notices under this part shall be
provided to the Commission through the
appropriate Regional office.
(b) Should a tribe wish to submit
notices electronically, it should contact
the appropriate Regional office for
guidance on acceptable document
formats and means of transmission.
§ 558.6
Compliance with this part.
All tribal gaming ordinances and
ordinance amendments that have been
approved by the Chair prior to the
effective date of this section and that
reference this part do not need to be
amended to comply with this section.
All future ordinance submissions,
however, must comply.
Dated: December 16, 2011, Washington,
DC.
Tracie L. Stevens,
Chairwoman.
Steffani A. Cochran,
Vice-Chairwoman.
Daniel J. Little,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2011–32760 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
§ 558.4 Notice of information impacting
eligibility and licensee’s right to a hearing.
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1095]
(a) If, after the issuance of a gaming
license, the Commission receives
reliable information indicating that a
key employee or a primary management
official is not eligible for employment
under § 556.5, the Commission shall
notify the issuing tribe of the
information.
(b) Upon receipt of such notification
under paragraph (a) of this section, a
tribe shall immediately suspend the
license and shall provide the licensee
with written notice of suspension and
proposed revocation.
RIN 1625–AA08
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Special Local Regulations; Patriot
Challenge Kayak Race, Ashley River,
Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations on the
Ashley River in Charleston, South
Carolina during the Patriot Challenge
Kayak Race on Saturday, April 28, 2012.
Approximately 150 paddle boats are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79572
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Proposed Rules
anticipated to participate in the Patriot
Challenge Kayak Race. Participant
paddle boats will include: kayaks,
canoes, and paddleboards. These special
local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters of the United States
during the race. The special local
regulations consist of a series of moving
buffer zones around participant vessels
as they transit the Ashley River from
Brittlebank Park to Tidewater Reach and
back to Brittlebank Park. Persons and
vessels that are not participating in the
race are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within any of the buffer
zones unless authorized by the Captain
of the Charleston or a designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 10, 2012. Requests
for public meetings must be received by
the Coast Guard on or before January 18,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–1095 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ensign John
Santorum, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:15 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–1095),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1095’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
1095’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one on or before February 10, 2012
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is the Coast Guard’s authority to
establish special local regulations: 33
U.S.C. 1233. The purpose of the
proposed rule is to insure safety of life
on navigable waters of the United States
during the Patriot Challenge Kayak
Race.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On Saturday, April 28, 2012, the
Patriot Challenge Kayak Race is
scheduled to take place on the waters of
the Ashley River in Charleston, South
Carolina. The race will begin at
Brittlebank Park, transit southeast on
the Ashley River, head north between
Shutes Folly Island and the Charleston
peninsula, and then turn around in
Tidewater Reach. The race will return to
Brittlebank Park by the same route.
Approximately 150 paddle boats are
anticipated to participate in the Patriot
Challenge Kayak Race. Participant
paddle boats will include: Kayaks,
canoes, and paddleboards.
The proposed rule would establish
special local regulations on the Ashley
River in Charleston, South Carolina
consisting of a series of buffer zones
around vessels participating in the
Patriot Challenge Kayak Race. These
buffer zones would be as follows: (1) All
waters within 75 yards of the lead safety
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Proposed Rules
vessel; (2) all waters within 75 yards of
the last safety vessel; and (3) all waters
within 100 yards of all other
participating vessels, including kayaks,
canoes, and paddleboards. Notice of the
special local regulations, including the
identities of the lead safety vessel and
the last safety vessel, would be provided
prior to the marine parade by Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners. The special local
regulations would be enforced from
12:30 p.m. until 3:30 p.m. on April 28,
2012. Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the buffer zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels
would be able to request authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the buffer zones by
contacting the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16. If
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within any of the
buffer zones is granted by the Captain of
the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization would be
required to comply with the instructions
of the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has not been designated
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:15 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
The economic impact of this proposed
rule is not significant for the following
reasons: (1) The special local regulations
would be enforced for only three hours;
(2) although persons and vessels would
not be able to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the buffer
zones without authorization from the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, they would
be able to operate in the surrounding
area during the enforcement period; (3)
persons and vessels would still be able
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the buffer zones if
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative; and (4) the Coast Guard
would provide advance notification of
the safety zone to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of the Ashley River
encompassed within the special local
regulations from 12:30 p.m. until
3:30 p.m. on April 28, 2012. For the
reasons discussed in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section above, this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79573
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
Ensign John Santorum, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways
Management, Coast Guard; telephone
(843) 740–3184, email
John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
79574
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Protection of Children
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
marine parade, as described in figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this proposed rule. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:15 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary § 100.T07–1095 to
read as follows:
§ 100.T07–1095 Special Local Regulations;
Patriot Challenge Kayak Race, Ashley River,
Charleston, SC.
(a) Regulated Areas. The following
buffer zones are regulated areas during
the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race: (1) All
waters within 75 yards of the lead safety
vessel; (2) all waters within 75 yards of
the last safety vessel; and (3) all waters
within 100 yards of all other
participating vessels, including kayaks,
canoes, and paddleboards. The
identities of the lead safety vessel and
the last safety vessel will be provided
prior to the Patriot Challenge Kayak
Race by Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The race
will begin at Brittlebank Park, transit
southeast the Ashley River, head north
between Shutes Folly Island and the
Charleston peninsula, and then turn
around in Tidewater Reach. The race
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will return to Brittlebank Park by the
same route.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated areas unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated areas may
contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated areas is granted by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated areas by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement Date. This rule will
be enforced from 12:30 p.m. until 3:30
p.m. on April 28, 2012.
Dated: December 5, 2011.
M.F. White,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2011–32850 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0081; FRL–9609–5]
RIN 2060–AQ69
Revisions to Final Response to
Petition From New Jersey Regarding
SO2 Emissions From the Portland
Generating Station
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79571-79574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32850]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1095]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations; Patriot Challenge Kayak Race, Ashley
River, Charleston, SC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local
regulations on the Ashley River in Charleston, South Carolina during
the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race on Saturday, April 28, 2012.
Approximately 150 paddle boats are
[[Page 79572]]
anticipated to participate in the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race.
Participant paddle boats will include: kayaks, canoes, and
paddleboards. These special local regulations are necessary to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters of the United States during
the race. The special local regulations consist of a series of moving
buffer zones around participant vessels as they transit the Ashley
River from Brittlebank Park to Tidewater Reach and back to Brittlebank
Park. Persons and vessels that are not participating in the race are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within any of the buffer zones unless authorized by the
Captain of the Charleston or a designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 10, 2012. Requests for public meetings must
be received by the Coast Guard on or before January 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-1095 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ensign John Santorum, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email
John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-1095), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-1095'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-1095'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one on or before February 10, 2012 using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish special local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233. The
purpose of the proposed rule is to insure safety of life on navigable
waters of the United States during the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On Saturday, April 28, 2012, the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race is
scheduled to take place on the waters of the Ashley River in
Charleston, South Carolina. The race will begin at Brittlebank Park,
transit southeast on the Ashley River, head north between Shutes Folly
Island and the Charleston peninsula, and then turn around in Tidewater
Reach. The race will return to Brittlebank Park by the same route.
Approximately 150 paddle boats are anticipated to participate in the
Patriot Challenge Kayak Race. Participant paddle boats will include:
Kayaks, canoes, and paddleboards.
The proposed rule would establish special local regulations on the
Ashley River in Charleston, South Carolina consisting of a series of
buffer zones around vessels participating in the Patriot Challenge
Kayak Race. These buffer zones would be as follows: (1) All waters
within 75 yards of the lead safety
[[Page 79573]]
vessel; (2) all waters within 75 yards of the last safety vessel; and
(3) all waters within 100 yards of all other participating vessels,
including kayaks, canoes, and paddleboards. Notice of the special local
regulations, including the identities of the lead safety vessel and the
last safety vessel, would be provided prior to the marine parade by
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The special
local regulations would be enforced from 12:30 p.m. until 3:30 p.m. on
April 28, 2012. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the buffer zones
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels would be able to request
authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the buffer zones by contacting the Captain of the Port Charleston by
telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF
radio on channel 16. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within any of the buffer zones is granted by the Captain
of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all persons and
vessels receiving such authorization would be required to comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule has not been designated a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this
proposed rule under Executive Order 12866.
The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for
the following reasons: (1) The special local regulations would be
enforced for only three hours; (2) although persons and vessels would
not be able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
buffer zones without authorization from the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated representative, they would be able to
operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; (3)
persons and vessels would still be able to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the buffer zones if authorized by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative; and (4)
the Coast Guard would provide advance notification of the safety zone
to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators
of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of the Ashley River encompassed within the special
local regulations from 12:30 p.m. until 3:30 p.m. on April 28, 2012.
For the reasons discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review section
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact Ensign John
Santorum, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast
Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
[[Page 79574]]
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing special local regulations issued in conjunction
with a marine parade, as described in figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, an environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not required for this proposed rule. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 100.T07-1095 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.T07-1095 Special Local Regulations; Patriot Challenge Kayak
Race, Ashley River, Charleston, SC.
(a) Regulated Areas. The following buffer zones are regulated areas
during the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race: (1) All waters within 75 yards
of the lead safety vessel; (2) all waters within 75 yards of the last
safety vessel; and (3) all waters within 100 yards of all other
participating vessels, including kayaks, canoes, and paddleboards. The
identities of the lead safety vessel and the last safety vessel will be
provided prior to the Patriot Challenge Kayak Race by Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The race will begin at
Brittlebank Park, transit southeast the Ashley River, head north
between Shutes Folly Island and the Charleston peninsula, and then turn
around in Tidewater Reach. The race will return to Brittlebank Park by
the same route.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
areas unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated areas may contact the Captain of the
Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated areas is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated areas by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Date. This rule will be enforced from 12:30 p.m.
until 3:30 p.m. on April 28, 2012.
Dated: December 5, 2011.
M.F. White,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2011-32850 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P