Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority, 79680-79682 [2011-32788]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
79680
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Notices
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Total Annual Burden: 9,995 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
The Commission is not requesting that
respondents submit confidential
information. However, respondents may
request materials or information
submitted to the Commission be
withheld from public inspection under
47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: This collection is
being submitted as a revision to a
currently approved collection. In
November 2011, the Commission
adopted an order reforming its high-cost
universal service support mechanisms.
Connect America Fund; A National
Broadband Plan for Our Future;
Establish Just and Reasonable Rates for
Local Exchange Carriers; High-Cost
Universal Service Support; Developing a
Unified Intercarrier Compensation
Regime; Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service; Lifeline and Link-Up;
Universal Service Reform—Mobility
Fund, WC Docket Nos. 10–90, 07–135,
05–337, 03–109; GN Docket No. 09–51;
CC Docket Nos. 01–92, 96–45; WT
Docket No. 10–208, FCC 11–161. This
revision addresses several reforms
adopted in the order. The Commission
plans to submit additional revisions to
3060–0986 for OMB review to address
other substantial, non-emergency
reforms adopted in the order at a later
date.
The order provides that existing highcost support for price cap incumbent
local exchange carriers will be frozen at
2011 levels. In addition, the order
provides for up to $300 million
annually in incremental support to
those carriers, to be allocated by the use
of a cost equation. Carriers accepting
such incremental funding will be
required to meet defined broadband
deployment obligations. Eligible carriers
will be required to notify the
Commission, the Universal Service
Fund Administrative Company (the
Universal Service Fund Administrator
or USAC), as well as relevant state and
Tribal authorities the amount, if any, of
funds they accept. Carriers accepting
funding will also be required to identify
the areas to which they will deploy
broadband to meet their deployment
obligations. Specifically, carriers will be
required to provide, in electronic form,
the following data for each location to
which they intend to deploy broadband
in satisfaction of their obligation:
latitude, longitude, census block, and
wire center.
The order also adopts a rule to reduce,
dollar-for-dollar, a carrier’s high-cost
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
loop support (for rate-of-return carriers)
or Connect America Phase I support (for
price cap carriers) to the extent that the
carrier’s local end user rate plus state
regulated fees do not meet a specified
urban rate floor. Accordingly, carriers
will be required to report, on an annual
basis, the local end user rates that fall
below the specified urban rate floor, and
the number of lines associated with
each rate so that the universal service
fund Administrator can calculate
reductions in support.
The order also modifies section
54.307 (often called the ‘‘identical
support rule’’) and related rules, which
provide that competitive eligible
telecommunications carriers receive the
same per-line level of support as
received by incumbent LECs serving the
same areas. As a result, the Commission
will be reducing the burdens associated
with a number of collections in this
control number, including line count
filings for competitive ETCs and
incumbent LECs serving competitive
areas, disaggregation plans (which
permit incumbent LECs to target
support for the purpose of calculating
per-line support amounts), and
certifications for carriers serving Tribal
lands and Alaska native regions. In
addition, the Commission eliminates the
‘‘own costs’’ exception to the interim
cap for competitive ETCs. The interim
cap limited the total annual amount of
high-cost support competitive ETCs in
any state could receive to the amount
competitive ETCs in that state received
in March 2008 on an annualized basis.
The ‘‘own costs’’ exception provided
that competitive ETCs that showed that
they met the support threshold in the
same manner as the incumbent LEC
would not be subject to the cap.
Eliminating the ‘‘own costs’’ exception
does not alter the content of this
information collection; it does, however,
address the terms of clearance in the
May 2009 Notice of Office of
Management and Budget Action.
The order also revises the
certifications that state commissions (or
ETCs that are not subject to state
jurisdiction) are required to file
annually with the Commission and the
universal service fund Administrator to
ensure that carriers use universal
service support ‘‘only for the provision,
maintenance and upgrading of facilities
and services for which the support is
intended’’ consistent with section 254(e)
of the Act. The existing certifications are
prospective only. Although the existing
certifications are prospective only, the
revised certification will ensure that
carriers not only will use support in the
next year for the intended purposes, but
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
also have used support in the prior year
for the intended purposes.
The order also eliminates eligibility
for Safety Net Additive support for costs
incurred after 2009. Accordingly, this
collection is being revised to eliminate
the requirement that carriers notify the
Commission and USAC that they qualify
for Safety Net Additive Support.
The order also eliminates the
distinction between ‘‘rural’’ and ‘‘nonrural’’ carriers. Therefore, this collection
is being revised to eliminate the
reporting requirements for selfcertification as a rural carrier.
The Order also moves the
recordkeeping requirement from 47 CFR
54.202(e) to new 47 CFR 54.320. It also
increases the required document
retention period from five to ten years
and makes clear that carriers are subject
to random compliance audits and other
investigations and must make all
documents and records available to the
Commission, any of its Bureaus or
Offices, the universal service fund
Administrator, and their respective
auditors.
Finally, during the review process,
the Commission determined that the
reporting requirements of OMB Control
Number 3060–0894 should be
eliminated. The order eliminated the
rate comparability review and
certification as well as the certification
letter accounting for receipt of federal
support in OMB Control Number 3060–
0894. These requirements are
duplicative of the certification pursuant
to section 254(e) of the Act, which is
contained in the instant OMB Control
Number. Upon OMB approval of this
revision, the Commission will
voluntarily discontinue OMB Control
Number 3060–0894.
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–32786 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission Under Delegated
Authority
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burden and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Notices
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), the Federal Communications
Commission invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s).
Comments are requested concerning: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to
further reduce the information burden
for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before February 21,
2012. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments
to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at
(202) 395–5167 or via Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, via the
Internet at Judith-b.herman@fcc.gov. To
submit your PRA comments by email
send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418–0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0927.
Title: Auditor’s Annual Independence
and Objectivity Certification.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents: 4
respondents; 4 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 5
hours.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. Sections
201(b), 219(b) and 220 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Total Annual Burden: 20 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality.
However, respondents may request
materials or information submitted to
the Commission be withheld from
public inspection under 47 CFR 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission is
seeking an extension of this information
collection in order to obtain the full
three year approval from OMB. There is
no change to the annual reporting
requirement. There is no change to the
Commission’s previous burden
estimates.
Section 64.904 requires certain local
exchange carriers, in connection with
their cost allocation manual filings and
the accompanying financial reports the
Commission prescribes under 47 U.S.C.
201(b), 219(b) and 220, to have an attest
engagement performed by an
independent auditor every two years,
over the prior two year period. The
attest engagement is to be performed in
accordance with the attestation
standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA), except as otherwise directed
by the Chief, Enforcement Bureau. The
audit is to be conducted in compliance
with generally accepted auditing
standards (GAAS), except as otherwise
directed by the Commission’s
Enforcement Bureau. The Responsible
Accounting Office (RAO) letter requires
that carriers’ independent auditors:
(a) Disclose in writing all
relationships between the auditor and
its related entities and the carrier and its
related entities that in the auditor’s
professional judgment may reasonably
be thought to bear on independence;
(b) Confirm in writing that in its
professional judgment it is independent
of the carrier; and
(c) Discuss the auditor’s
independence.
The information is used by the
Commission to determine whether the
independent auditors are performing
their audits independently and
unbiased of the carrier they audit.
OMB Control Number: 3060–1124.
Title: Section 80.231, Technical
Requirements for Class B Automatic
Identification System (AIS) Equipment.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79681
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents: 20
respondents; 20 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and third party
disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. Sections 151–
155 and 301–309 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Total Annual Burden: 20 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $28,000.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality.
However, respondents may request
materials or information submitted to
the Commission be withheld from
public inspection under 47 CFR 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission is
seeking an extension of this information
collection in order to obtain the full
three year approval from OMB. There is
no change to the annual reporting
requirement. There is no change to the
Commission’s previous burden
estimates.
When the Commission adopted and
released a Second Report and Order,
FCC 08–208, it contained in Section
80.231, a requirement that
manufacturers of Class B Automatic
Identification System (AIS) transmitters
for the Maritime Radio Service must
include with each transmitting device a
statement explaining how to enter static
information accurately and to affix a
warning that entering the vessel tracking
and navigation information transmitted
from Class B AIS device(s) are accurate
and reliable thereby promoting marine
safety. The rule also requires
manufacturers to obtain a letter from the
U.S. Coast Guard stating that the AIS
device satisfies all of the requirements
specified in IEC 62287–1, and to submit
the letter to the Commission with its
certification application for a Class B
AIS device.
Additionally, prior to submitting a
certification application (FCC Form 731,
OMB Control Number 3060–0057) for a
Class B AIS device, the following
information must be submitted in
duplicate to the Commandant (CG–521),
U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20593–0001:
(1) The name of the manufacturer or
grantee and the model number of the
AIS device; and
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
79682
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Notices
(2) Copies of the test report and test
data obtained from the test facility
showing that the device complies with
the environmental and operational
requirements identified in IEC 62287–1.
After reviewing the information
described in the certification
application, the U.S. Coast Guard will
issue a letter stating whether the AIS
device satisfies all of the requirements
specified in IEC–62287–1. A
certification application for an AIS
device submitted to the Commission
must contain a copy of the U.S. Coast
Guard letter stating that the device
satisfies all of the requirements
specified in IEC 62287–1, a copy of the
technical test date and the instruction
manual(s).
The information collection requires
that manufacturers of AIS transmitters
label each product and affix and label
each transmitting device with a
statement explaining how to enter static
information and the following
statement:
‘‘WARNING: It is a violation of the rules of
the Federal Communications Commission to
input a MMSI that has not been properly
assigned to the end user, or to otherwise
input any inaccurate data in this device.’’
The information collection also
requires manufacturers to assure the
device meets standards set forth in IEC–
62287–1 and is used by FCC engineers
to determine the interference potential
of the proposed device’s operation.
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–32788 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License; Applicants
Notice is hereby given that the
following applicants have filed with the
Federal Maritime Commission an
application for a license as a NonVessel-Operating Common Carrier
(NVO) and/or Ocean Freight Forwarder
(OFF)—Ocean Transportation
Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section
19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as
amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and
46 CFR part 515). Notice is also hereby
given of the filing of applications to
amend an existing OTI license or the
Qualifying Individual (QI) for a license.
Interested persons may contact the
Office of Transportation Intermediaries,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, by telephone at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
(202) 523–5843 or by email at
OTI@fmc.gov.
A.C.T. Logistics, LLC (NVO), 154–09
146th Avenue, 3rd Floor, Jamaica, NY
11434. Officers: Annie Chik, CoPresident, (Qualifying Individual),
Elaine Roman, Co-President/
Secretary. Application Type: License
Transfer.
Canyon Global Logistics, LLC (NVO &
OFF), 2928–B Greens Road, Suite 100,
Houston, TX 77032. Officers: Russell
C. Daniel, President, (Qualifying
Individual), Jared L. Jensen, Vice
President. Application Type: New
NVO & OFF License.
Delex Air Cargo, LLC dba DAC Services
(OFF), JFK Int’l Airport, Cargo Plaza,
Bldg. 87, Jamaica, NY 11430. Officers:
Anna Shneyder, General Manager,
(Qualifying Individual), Oleg
Ardachev, President. Application
Type: New OFF License.
Ever Reach Logistics Inc (NVO), 1169
Fairway Drive, Suite 202, City of
Industry, CA 91789. Officer: Xiuji
Zhang, President/Secretary/Treasurer,
(Qualifying Individual). Application
Type: New NVO.
Evergreen Cargo LLC (NVO), 11280
Sebring Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45240.
Officers: Willy M. Lukanga, Member,
(Qualifying Individual), Nana
Kyereme, Managing Member.
Application Type: New NVO License.
Heavy Logistics, Inc. dba BM Logistics
(NVO & OFF), 3706 South Bannock
Street, Englewood, Co 80110. Officers:
Bernhard J. Maierhofer, President/
Sales, (Qualifying Individual), Marta
Witkowska, President/Operations/
Secretary. Application Type: New
NVO & OFF License.
Lidal Logistics Inc (NVO & OFF), 11301
Interchange Circle South, Miramar, FL
33025. Officer: Juan R. Sutil,
President/Secretary/Treasurer,
(Qualifying Individual). Application
Type: New NVO & OFF License.
N.G.K. Corporation (NVO & OFF), 8120
NW 71 Street, Miami, FL 33166.
Officer: Gladys E. Fisboin, President,
(Qualifying Individual). Application
Type: Add NVO Service.
Pegasus Worldwide Logistics NY, Inc.
(NVO & OFF), 10 E. Merrick Road,
Suite 204, Valley Stream, NY 11580.
Officers: Arden S. Chan, Director/
Secretary, (Qualifying Individual),
Cooper Chao, Director/President.
Application Type: New NVO & OFF
License.
Premier Logistics Management LLC
(NVO & OFF), 3727 59th Avenue
Circle E., Ellenton, FL 34222. Officer:
William A. Gross, Managing Member,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(Qualifying Individual). Application
Type: License Transfer.
Princeton Relocation Management, Inc.
dba PRM International (OFF), 106
Galloping Hill Road, Basking Ridge,
NJ 07920. Officers: Edwin F. Banfield,
Jr, President/Treasurer, (Qualifying
Individual), Suzanne M. Banfield,
Corporate Secretary. Application
Type: New OFF License.
Net Cargo LLC (NVO & OFF), 9619 NW
33 Street, Doral, FL 33172. Officers:
Victor E. Segura, Managing Member/
Treasurer, (Qualifying Individual),
Jorge A. Paez, Managing Member/
Secretary. Application Type: New
NVO & OFF License.
Nobel Van Lines Inc. (NVO & OFF),
18255 NE 4th Court, Section A, North
Miami Beach, FL 33162. Officer:
Yaniv Dalei, President/Secretary/CFO,
(Qualifying Individual). Application
Type: New NVO & OFF License.
TGL New York LLC (NVO & OFF), 11
Sunrise Plaza, #307, Valley Stream,
NY 11580. Officers: Vincent A.
Sommella, Operations Manager,
(Qualifying Individual), Vadim
Nemirorskyi, Member. Application
Type: New NVO & OFF.
World Wide Express LLC (NVO & OFF),
6000 NW 32 Court, Miami, FL 33142.
Officers: Marius Marcinkevicius,
Member/Manager, (Qualifying
Individual), Jonas Vencius, Member/
Manager. Application Type: Add
NVO Service.
Dated: December 16, 2011.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–32712 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License; Revocation
The Federal Maritime Commission
hereby gives notice that the following
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
licenses have been revoked pursuant to
section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984
(46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the
regulations of the Commission
pertaining to the licensing of Ocean
Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR
part 515, effective on the corresponding
date shown below:
License Number: 4365N.
Name: Logistics Management
International, Inc.
Address: 600 Rinehart Road, Suite
1012, Lake Mary, FL 32746.
Date Revoked: November 10, 2011.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79680-79682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction
[[Page 79681]]
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Federal Communications
Commission invites the general public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on the following information
collection(s). Comments are requested concerning: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to further reduce the information
burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person
shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does
not display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before February 21, 2012. If you anticipate that you
will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within
the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC
contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at (202) 395-5167 or via Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, via the Internet at Judith-b.herman@fcc.gov.
To submit your PRA comments by email send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418-0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0927.
Title: Auditor's Annual Independence and Objectivity Certification.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents: 4 respondents; 4 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 5 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47
U.S.C. Sections 201(b), 219(b) and 220 of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 20 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality. However, respondents may request materials or
information submitted to the Commission be withheld from public
inspection under 47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission's rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission is seeking an extension of this
information collection in order to obtain the full three year approval
from OMB. There is no change to the annual reporting requirement. There
is no change to the Commission's previous burden estimates.
Section 64.904 requires certain local exchange carriers, in
connection with their cost allocation manual filings and the
accompanying financial reports the Commission prescribes under 47
U.S.C. 201(b), 219(b) and 220, to have an attest engagement performed
by an independent auditor every two years, over the prior two year
period. The attest engagement is to be performed in accordance with the
attestation standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), except as otherwise directed by
the Chief, Enforcement Bureau. The audit is to be conducted in
compliance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS), except as
otherwise directed by the Commission's Enforcement Bureau. The
Responsible Accounting Office (RAO) letter requires that carriers'
independent auditors:
(a) Disclose in writing all relationships between the auditor and
its related entities and the carrier and its related entities that in
the auditor's professional judgment may reasonably be thought to bear
on independence;
(b) Confirm in writing that in its professional judgment it is
independent of the carrier; and
(c) Discuss the auditor's independence.
The information is used by the Commission to determine whether the
independent auditors are performing their audits independently and
unbiased of the carrier they audit.
OMB Control Number: 3060-1124.
Title: Section 80.231, Technical Requirements for Class B Automatic
Identification System (AIS) Equipment.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents: 20 respondents; 20 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement and third
party disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47
U.S.C. Sections 151-155 and 301-309 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 20 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $28,000.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality. However, respondents may request materials or
information submitted to the Commission be withheld from public
inspection under 47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission's rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission is seeking an extension of this
information collection in order to obtain the full three year approval
from OMB. There is no change to the annual reporting requirement. There
is no change to the Commission's previous burden estimates.
When the Commission adopted and released a Second Report and Order,
FCC 08-208, it contained in Section 80.231, a requirement that
manufacturers of Class B Automatic Identification System (AIS)
transmitters for the Maritime Radio Service must include with each
transmitting device a statement explaining how to enter static
information accurately and to affix a warning that entering the vessel
tracking and navigation information transmitted from Class B AIS
device(s) are accurate and reliable thereby promoting marine safety.
The rule also requires manufacturers to obtain a letter from the U.S.
Coast Guard stating that the AIS device satisfies all of the
requirements specified in IEC 62287-1, and to submit the letter to the
Commission with its certification application for a Class B AIS device.
Additionally, prior to submitting a certification application (FCC
Form 731, OMB Control Number 3060-0057) for a Class B AIS device, the
following information must be submitted in duplicate to the Commandant
(CG-521), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001:
(1) The name of the manufacturer or grantee and the model number of
the AIS device; and
[[Page 79682]]
(2) Copies of the test report and test data obtained from the test
facility showing that the device complies with the environmental and
operational requirements identified in IEC 62287-1.
After reviewing the information described in the certification
application, the U.S. Coast Guard will issue a letter stating whether
the AIS device satisfies all of the requirements specified in IEC-
62287-1. A certification application for an AIS device submitted to the
Commission must contain a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter stating
that the device satisfies all of the requirements specified in IEC
62287-1, a copy of the technical test date and the instruction
manual(s).
The information collection requires that manufacturers of AIS
transmitters label each product and affix and label each transmitting
device with a statement explaining how to enter static information and
the following statement:
``WARNING: It is a violation of the rules of the Federal
Communications Commission to input a MMSI that has not been properly
assigned to the end user, or to otherwise input any inaccurate data
in this device.''
The information collection also requires manufacturers to assure
the device meets standards set forth in IEC-62287-1 and is used by FCC
engineers to determine the interference potential of the proposed
device's operation.
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-32788 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P