Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Revised Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the Charleston, Huntington, Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Areas; Correction, 79539-79541 [2011-32647]
Download as PDF
79539
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 21, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving Delaware’s control of VOCs
from adhesives and sealants may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 8, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart I—Delaware
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding an entry for
Regulation 1141, Section 4.0 to read as
follows:
§ 52.420
■
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE DELAWARE SIP
State regulation (7 DNREC
1100)
*
Title/subject
*
*
State
effective
date
EPA approval date
*
*
Additional explanation
*
1141 .........................................
Limiting Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer and Commercial Products
*
*
Section 4.0 ...............................
*
Adhesives & Sealants ............
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FDMS Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2011–
0511; FRL–9609–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Revised Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets for the Charleston,
Huntington, Parkersburg, Weirton, and
Wheeling 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance
Areas; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Dec 21, 2011
*
4/11/09
*
*
*
12/22/11 [Insert page number
Addition of VOC limits for adwhere the document begins].
hesive and sealant products, including 25 adhesives, 4 adhesive primers, 5
sealants, and 3 sealant
primers.
*
*
This document corrects an
error in the rule language of a direct
final rule pertaining to EPA’s approval
of the revised motor vehicle emissions
budgets for the Charleston, Huntington,
Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling 8hour ozone maintenance areas. The
previous rulemaking amended the
maintenance plans’ 2009 and 2018
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) submitted by the State of West
Virginia.
DATES: Effective date: December 22,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Kotsch, (215) 814–3335 or by
email at kotsch.martin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean
EPA. On September 15, 2011 (76 FR
56795), we published a final rulemaking
action announcing our approval of
revised mobile emissions budgets for
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2011–32646 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
the Charleston, Huntington,
Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling
8-hour ozone maintenance areas. In this
document, in 40 CFR 52.2532, we
inadvertently approved incorrect
emissions budgets for the Charleston
and Wheeling maintenance areas. The
intent of the rule is to correct those
emissions budgets. This action corrects
the erroneous language.
In rule document 2011–23261,
published in the Federal Register on
September 15, 2011 in 76 FR 56795 on
page 56981, paragraphs 52.2532(a) and
52.2532(e) are corrected to read as
follows:
(a) EPA approves the following
revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the
Charleston, West Virginia 8-hour ozone
maintenance area submitted by the
Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Protection on March 14,
2011:
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
79540
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Applicable geographic area
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties) ....................................................................
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties) ....................................................................
(e) EPA approves the following
revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the
Wheeling, West Virginia 8-hour ozone
maintenance area submitted by the
Secretary of the Department of
2009
2018
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties) .............................................................................
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties) .............................................................................
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a significant regulatory
action and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a good cause finding that this action is
not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16.7
13.5
Tons per day
(TPD) VOC
Year
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings issued under the
executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
Tons per day
(TPD) NOX
38.9
17.1
Environmental Protection on March 14,
2011:
Applicable geographic area
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting an incorrect citation in a
previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Tons per day
(TPD) VOC
Year
2009
2018
Tons per day
(TPD) NOX
10.4
7.7
9.1
3.1
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of [insert
effective date]. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR 52.2532 for West Virginia is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Dated: December 02, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
III.
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX—West Virginia
2. In § 52.2532 is amended by revising
paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2532
budgets.
Motor vehicle emissions
(a) EPA approves the following
revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the
Charleston, West Virginia 8-hour ozone
maintenance area submitted by the
Secretary of the Department of
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 246 / Thursday, December 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
79541
Environmental Protection on March 14,
2011:
Applicable geographic area
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties) ....................................................................
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties) ....................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
(e) EPA approves the following
revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the
Wheeling, West Virginia 8-hour ozone
maintenance area submitted by the
Applicable geographic area
2009
2018
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0081; FRL–9609–4]
RIN 2060–AQ69
Revisions to Final Response to
Petition From New Jersey Regarding
SO2 Emissions From the Portland
Generating Station
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is taking direct final
action to amend the preamble and rule
text to the Final Response to Petition
From New Jersey Regarding SO2
Emissions From the Portland Generating
Station (Portland) published November
7, 2011, to revise minor misstatements.
These revisions clarify the EPA’s
finding that Portland significantly
contributes to nonattainment or
interferes with maintenance of the
1-hour sulfur dioxide (SO2) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)
in the State of New Jersey, and not in
specific counties within the state. These
revisions have no impact on any other
provisions of the rule.
DATES: The direct final rule is effective
on March 21, 2012 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse
comment by February 21, 2012. If the
EPA receives an adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Dec 21, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Tons per day
(TPD) VOC
Year
OAR–2011–0081, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2011–0081.
• Fax: (202) 566–9744. Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–
0081.
• Mail: EPA Docket Center, EPA West
(Air Docket), Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0081,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center
(Air Docket), Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0081,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1301
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 3334,
Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–
0081. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16.7
13.5
Tons per day
(TPD) NOX
38.9
17.1
Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Protection on March 14,
2011:
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties) .............................................................................
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties) .............................................................................
[FR Doc. 2011–32647 Filed 12–21–11; 8:45 am]
Tons per day
(TPD) VOC
Year
2009
2018
10.4
7.7
Tons per day
(TPD) NOX
9.1
3.1
comment directly to the EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider
your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters and
any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional
information about the EPA’s public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in www.regulations.
gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket
Center EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566–
1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Todd Hawes (919) 541–5591, hawes.
todd@epa.gov, or Ms. Gobeail McKinley
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 79539-79541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32647]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FDMS Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0511; FRL-9609-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Revised Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the
Charleston, Huntington, Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Areas; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the rule language of a
direct final rule pertaining to EPA's approval of the revised motor
vehicle emissions budgets for the Charleston, Huntington, Parkersburg,
Weirton, and Wheeling 8-hour ozone maintenance areas. The previous
rulemaking amended the maintenance plans' 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) submitted by the State of West Virginia.
DATES: Effective date: December 22, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Kotsch, (215) 814-3335 or by
email at kotsch.martin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' are used we mean EPA. On September 15, 2011 (76 FR
56795), we published a final rulemaking action announcing our approval
of revised mobile emissions budgets for the Charleston, Huntington,
Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling 8-hour ozone maintenance areas. In
this document, in 40 CFR 52.2532, we inadvertently approved incorrect
emissions budgets for the Charleston and Wheeling maintenance areas.
The intent of the rule is to correct those emissions budgets. This
action corrects the erroneous language.
In rule document 2011-23261, published in the Federal Register on
September 15, 2011 in 76 FR 56795 on page 56981, paragraphs 52.2532(a)
and 52.2532(e) are corrected to read as follows:
(a) EPA approves the following revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Charleston, West Virginia 8-hour
ozone maintenance area submitted by the Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Protection on March 14, 2011:
[[Page 79540]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tons per day Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (TPD) VOC (TPD) NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties)................... 2009 16.7 38.9
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties)................... 2018 13.5 17.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) EPA approves the following revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Wheeling, West Virginia 8-hour ozone
maintenance area submitted by the Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Protection on March 14, 2011:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tons per day Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (TPD) VOC (TPD) NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties)...................... 2009 10.4 9.1
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties)...................... 2018 7.7 3.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
an incorrect citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a significant regulatory action and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a good cause finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of [insert
effective date]. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR 52.2532 for West Virginia is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Dated: December 02, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region III.
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX--West Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2532 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.2532 Motor vehicle emissions budgets.
(a) EPA approves the following revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Charleston, West Virginia 8-hour
ozone maintenance area submitted by the Secretary of the Department of
[[Page 79541]]
Environmental Protection on March 14, 2011:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tons per day Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (TPD) VOC (TPD) NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties)................... 2009 16.7 38.9
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties)................... 2018 13.5 17.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) EPA approves the following revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Wheeling, West Virginia 8-hour ozone
maintenance area submitted by the Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Protection on March 14, 2011:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tons per day Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (TPD) VOC (TPD) NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties)...................... 2009 10.4 9.1
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties)...................... 2018 7.7 3.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2011-32647 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P