Copayments for Medications in 2012, 78824-78826 [2011-32532]
Download as PDF
78824
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
varying levels of SMC, which is an
amount of compensation in addition to
amounts payable for service-connected
disability, including disabilities rated
100-percent disabling, where applicable.
Indeed, as amended, 38 CFR 4.124a
includes a note to the rater: ‘‘Consider
the need for special monthly
compensation.’’ Furthermore, because
this rule does not alter VA’s procedures
regarding evaluation of all disabilities
and disorders, any ancillary benefits to
which a veteran may be entitled will be
preserved. We thus make no changes to
the regulation based on this comment.
One general public commenter raised
claim-specific issues that are unrelated
to this rulemaking. We thus are making
no changes to the proposed rule based
on this comment.
Therefore, based on the rationale set
forth in the proposed rule and this
document, we are adopting the
provisions of the proposed rule as a
final rule with no changes.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of‘1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This rule will have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:31 Dec 19, 2011
Jkt 226001
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Dated: December 15, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 38 CFR part 4, subpart B, is
amended as set forth below:
PART 4—SCHEDULE FOR RATING
DISABILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless
otherwise noted.
Subpart B—Disability Ratings
2. In § 4.124a, revise diagnostic code
8017 to read as follows:
■
§ 4.124a Schedule of ratings—neurological
conditions and convulsive disorders.
*
*
*
*
*
Rating
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The rule could
affect only VA beneficiaries and will not
directly affect small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analyses
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are as follows: 64.109,
Veterans Compensation for ServiceConnected Disability; and 64.110,
Veterans Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation for Service-Connected
Death.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on October 7, 2011, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
8017 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
*
100
Note: Consider the need for special
monthly compensation.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–32531 Filed 12–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO28
Copayments for Medications in 2012
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) amends its medical
regulations concerning the copayment
required for certain medications. Under
current regulations, beginning on
January 1, 2012, the copayment amount
must be increased based on the
prescription drug component of the
Medical Consumer Price Index, and the
maximum annual copayment amount
must be increased when the copayment
is increased. A prior action ‘‘froze’’ the
copayment amount for veterans in VA’s
health care system enrollment priority
categories 2 through 6 and allowed for
increased copayments, as required by
the current regulation, only for veterans
in priority categories 7 and 8. This
document freezes copayments at the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
current rate for veterans in priority
categories 2 through 6 for the next 12
months, and thereafter resumes
increasing copayments in accordance
with any change in the prescription
drug component of the Medical
Consumer Price Index (CPI–P).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on December 20, 2011.
Comments must be received on or
before February 21, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by email through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AO28, Copayments for Medications in
2012.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
In addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Cunningham, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office, 810
Vermont Avenue, Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–1599 (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 38
U.S.C. 1722A(a), VA must require
veterans to pay a $2 copayment for each
30-day supply of medication furnished
on an outpatient basis for the treatment
of a nonservice-connected disability or
condition. Under 38 U.S.C. 1722A(b),
VA ‘‘may,’’ by regulation, increase that
copayment and establish a maximum
annual copayment (a ‘‘cap’’). We
interpret section 1722A(b) to mean that
VA has discretion to determine the
appropriate copayment amount and
annual cap amount for medication
furnished on an outpatient basis for
covered treatment, provided that any
decision by VA to increase the
copayment amount or annual cap
amount is the subject of a rulemaking
proceeding. The copayment amount
cannot exceed the cost to the Secretary
of this medication (including
administrative costs). In 66 Fed Reg
63499 we determined a method for
calculating this cost. We have
implemented this statute in 38 CFR
17.110.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:31 Dec 19, 2011
Jkt 226001
Under current 38 CFR 17.110(b)(1),
veterans are ‘‘obligated to pay VA a
copayment for each 30-day or less
supply of medication provided by VA
on an outpatient basis (other than
medication administered during
treatment).’’ Under the current
regulation, for the period from July 1,
2010, through December 31, 2011, ‘‘the
copayment amount for veterans in
priority categories 2 through 6 of VA’s
health care system * * * is $8.’’ 38 CFR
17.110(b)(1)(ii). ‘‘For veterans in priority
categories 7 and 8 of VA’s health care
system (see § 17.36), the copayment
amount from July 1, 2010, through
December 31, 2011, is $9.’’ 38 CFR
17.110(b)(1)(iii). Thereafter, the
copayment amount for all affected
veterans is to be established using a
formula based on the prescription drug
component of the Medical Consumer
Price Index, set forth in 38 CFR
17.110(b)(1)(iv).
Current § 17.110(b)(2) also includes a
‘‘cap’’ on the total amount of
copayments in a calendar year for a
veteran enrolled in one of VA’s health
care enrollment system priority
categories 2 through 6. Through
December 31, 2011, that cap is set at
$960. Thereafter, the cap is to
‘‘increase[ ] by $120 for each $1 increase
in the copayment amount’’ applicable to
veterans enrolled in one of VA’s health
care enrollment system priority
categories 2 through 6.
On February 22, 2011, we published
a final rulemaking that established the
copayment amounts discussed above,
effective through December 31, 2011. 76
FR 9646. In the interim final rule which
announced our intent to freeze
copayments through December 31, 2011,
we made clear that we would return to
the CPI–P methodology ‘‘unless
additional rulemaking is initiated.’’ 75
FR 32670. We are now undertaking
‘‘additional rulemaking’’ to extend the
freeze in copayment rates.
In our prior rulemaking, we indicated
that we were reviewing whether to
revise the current regulatory formula. 76
FR 9647. We are still considering such
revision, and will continue to review
the matter in 2012. Therefore, as before,
we continue to believe that a freeze is
appropriate in light of this anticipated
review and given the current economic
climate, and propose to continue to
delay implementation of the increase in
the copayment amount (and the
corresponding $120 increase in the cap)
until the completion of our review for
veterans in priority categories 2 through
6 of VA’s health care system. 76 FR
9647. We continue to believe that it is
appropriate to maintain the current
copayment amount for these groups
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78825
while we review our overall copayment
methodology because these groups
would be impacted more by the increase
in the copayment due to their likely
greater need for medical care due to
their disabilities or conditions of
service. Therefore, we will continue the
copayment amount at the current $8 rate
for veterans in priority categories 2
through 6 through December 31, 2012,
in order to complete the review of
indicators to base our copayment
amounts. The cap will also remain at
the current level ($960) for these
veterans. Depending on the results of
the review described above, the
Secretary may initiate a new rulemaking
on this subject rather than continue to
rely on the CPI–P escalator provision to
determine the copayment amount.
At the end of calendar year 2012,
unless additional rulemaking is
initiated, VA will once again utilize the
CPI–P methodology in § 17.110(b)(1)(iv)
to determine whether to increase
copayments and calculate any mandated
increase in the copayment amount for
veterans in priority categories 2 through
6. At that time, the CPI–P as of
September 30, 2012, will be divided by
the index as of September 30, 2001,
which was 304.8. The ratio will then be
multiplied by the original copayment
amount of $7. The copayment amount of
the new calendar year will be rounded
down to the whole dollar amount. As
mandated by current § 17.110(b)(2), the
annual cap will be calculated by
increasing the cap by $120 for each $1
increase in the copayment amount. Any
change in the copayment amount and
cap, along with the associated
calculations explaining the basis for the
increase, will be published in a Federal
Register notice. Thus, the intended
effect of this rule is to temporarily
prevent increases in copayment
amounts and the copayment cap for
veterans in priority categories 2 through
6, following which copayments and the
copayment cap will increase as
prescribed in current § 17.110(b).
At the same time, in light of the
statutory requirement to share costs
under 38 U.S.C. 1722A and the
distinctions noted above regarding
veterans in priority categories 2 through
6, we will not implement a freeze on
any copayment increase pursuant to the
regulatory formula for veterans in
priority categories 7 and 8. A copayment
increase for these veterans will depend
upon the Medical Consumer Price
Index.
We note that we have not yet
proposed a new methodology to
establish copayments and, for that
reason, request public comment only on
the effect of this rulemaking, which is
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
78826
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
to freeze the copayment amount for
veterans in priority categories 2 through
6 while we study alternative
methodologies to calculate appropriate
copayment amounts for all veterans.
Administrative Procedure Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3), the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs finds that there is good
cause to dispense with the opportunity
for advance notice and opportunity for
public comment and good cause to
publish this rule with an immediate
effective date. As stated above, this rule
freezes at current rates the prescription
drug copayment that VA charges certain
veterans. The Secretary finds that it is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to delay this rule for the
purpose of soliciting advance public
comment or to have a delayed effective
date. Increasing the copayment amount
on January 1, 2012, might cause a
significant financial hardship for some
veterans.
For the above reason, the Secretary
issues this rule as an interim final rule.
VA will consider and address comments
that are received within 60 days of the
date this interim final rule is published
in the Federal Register.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
revised by this rulemaking, would
represent the exclusive legal authority
on this subject. No contrary rules or
procedures are authorized. All VA
guidance must be read to conform with
this rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance is superseded
by this rulemaking.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:31 Dec 19, 2011
Jkt 226001
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action. Accordingly, the Office of
Management and Budget has reviewed
this interim final rule.
Centers; 64.008, Veterans Domiciliary
Care; 64.009, Veterans Medical Care
Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing
Home Care; 64.011, Veterans Dental
Care; 64.012, Veterans Prescription
Service; 64.013, Veterans Prosthetic
Appliances; 64.014, Veterans State
Domiciliary Care; 64.015, Veterans State
Nursing Home Care; 64.016, Veterans
State Hospital Care; 64.018, Sharing
Specialized Medical Resources; 64.019,
Veterans Rehabilitation Alcohol and
Drug Dependence; 64.022, Veterans
Home Based Primary Care; and 64.024,
VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per
Diem Program.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This rule would have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Administrative practice and
procedure; Alcohol abuse; Alcoholism;
Claims; Day care; Dental health; Drug
abuse; Foreign relations; Government
contracts; Grant programs—health;
Grant programs—veterans; Health care;
Health facilities; Health professions;
Health records; Homeless; Medical and
dental schools; Medical devices;
Medical research; Mental health
programs; Nursing homes; Philippines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements; Scholarships and
fellowships, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this interim final rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
interim final rule will temporarily freeze
the copayments that certain veterans are
required to pay for prescription drugs
furnished by VA. The interim final rule
affects individuals and has no impact on
any small entities. Therefore, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program number and title for
this rule are as follows: 64.005, Grants
to States for Construction of State Home
Facilities; 64.007, Blind Rehabilitation
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on December 2, 2011, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Dated: December 15, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as
follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), and as noted
in specific sections.
2. In § 17.110, paragraphs (b)(1)(ii),
and (b)(2), remove ‘‘December 31, 2011’’
each place it appears and add, in each
place, ‘‘December 31, 2012’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2011–32532 Filed 12–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78824-78826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32532]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AO28
Copayments for Medications in 2012
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) amends its medical
regulations concerning the copayment required for certain medications.
Under current regulations, beginning on January 1, 2012, the copayment
amount must be increased based on the prescription drug component of
the Medical Consumer Price Index, and the maximum annual copayment
amount must be increased when the copayment is increased. A prior
action ``froze'' the copayment amount for veterans in VA's health care
system enrollment priority categories 2 through 6 and allowed for
increased copayments, as required by the current regulation, only for
veterans in priority categories 7 and 8. This document freezes
copayments at the
[[Page 78825]]
current rate for veterans in priority categories 2 through 6 for the
next 12 months, and thereafter resumes increasing copayments in
accordance with any change in the prescription drug component of the
Medical Consumer Price Index (CPI-P).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on December 20, 2011.
Comments must be received on or before February 21, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by email through https://www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026.
Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN
2900-AO28, Copayments for Medications in 2012.'' Copies of comments
received will be available for public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 461-4902 for an appointment. In addition, during the comment
period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Cunningham, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461-1599 (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 38 U.S.C. 1722A(a), VA must require
veterans to pay a $2 copayment for each 30-day supply of medication
furnished on an outpatient basis for the treatment of a nonservice-
connected disability or condition. Under 38 U.S.C. 1722A(b), VA
``may,'' by regulation, increase that copayment and establish a maximum
annual copayment (a ``cap''). We interpret section 1722A(b) to mean
that VA has discretion to determine the appropriate copayment amount
and annual cap amount for medication furnished on an outpatient basis
for covered treatment, provided that any decision by VA to increase the
copayment amount or annual cap amount is the subject of a rulemaking
proceeding. The copayment amount cannot exceed the cost to the
Secretary of this medication (including administrative costs). In 66
Fed Reg 63499 we determined a method for calculating this cost. We have
implemented this statute in 38 CFR 17.110.
Under current 38 CFR 17.110(b)(1), veterans are ``obligated to pay
VA a copayment for each 30-day or less supply of medication provided by
VA on an outpatient basis (other than medication administered during
treatment).'' Under the current regulation, for the period from July 1,
2010, through December 31, 2011, ``the copayment amount for veterans in
priority categories 2 through 6 of VA's health care system * * * is
$8.'' 38 CFR 17.110(b)(1)(ii). ``For veterans in priority categories 7
and 8 of VA's health care system (see Sec. 17.36), the copayment
amount from July 1, 2010, through December 31, 2011, is $9.'' 38 CFR
17.110(b)(1)(iii). Thereafter, the copayment amount for all affected
veterans is to be established using a formula based on the prescription
drug component of the Medical Consumer Price Index, set forth in 38 CFR
17.110(b)(1)(iv).
Current Sec. 17.110(b)(2) also includes a ``cap'' on the total
amount of copayments in a calendar year for a veteran enrolled in one
of VA's health care enrollment system priority categories 2 through 6.
Through December 31, 2011, that cap is set at $960. Thereafter, the cap
is to ``increase[ ] by $120 for each $1 increase in the copayment
amount'' applicable to veterans enrolled in one of VA's health care
enrollment system priority categories 2 through 6.
On February 22, 2011, we published a final rulemaking that
established the copayment amounts discussed above, effective through
December 31, 2011. 76 FR 9646. In the interim final rule which
announced our intent to freeze copayments through December 31, 2011, we
made clear that we would return to the CPI-P methodology ``unless
additional rulemaking is initiated.'' 75 FR 32670. We are now
undertaking ``additional rulemaking'' to extend the freeze in copayment
rates.
In our prior rulemaking, we indicated that we were reviewing
whether to revise the current regulatory formula. 76 FR 9647. We are
still considering such revision, and will continue to review the matter
in 2012. Therefore, as before, we continue to believe that a freeze is
appropriate in light of this anticipated review and given the current
economic climate, and propose to continue to delay implementation of
the increase in the copayment amount (and the corresponding $120
increase in the cap) until the completion of our review for veterans in
priority categories 2 through 6 of VA's health care system. 76 FR 9647.
We continue to believe that it is appropriate to maintain the current
copayment amount for these groups while we review our overall copayment
methodology because these groups would be impacted more by the increase
in the copayment due to their likely greater need for medical care due
to their disabilities or conditions of service. Therefore, we will
continue the copayment amount at the current $8 rate for veterans in
priority categories 2 through 6 through December 31, 2012, in order to
complete the review of indicators to base our copayment amounts. The
cap will also remain at the current level ($960) for these veterans.
Depending on the results of the review described above, the Secretary
may initiate a new rulemaking on this subject rather than continue to
rely on the CPI-P escalator provision to determine the copayment
amount.
At the end of calendar year 2012, unless additional rulemaking is
initiated, VA will once again utilize the CPI-P methodology in Sec.
17.110(b)(1)(iv) to determine whether to increase copayments and
calculate any mandated increase in the copayment amount for veterans in
priority categories 2 through 6. At that time, the CPI-P as of
September 30, 2012, will be divided by the index as of September 30,
2001, which was 304.8. The ratio will then be multiplied by the
original copayment amount of $7. The copayment amount of the new
calendar year will be rounded down to the whole dollar amount. As
mandated by current Sec. 17.110(b)(2), the annual cap will be
calculated by increasing the cap by $120 for each $1 increase in the
copayment amount. Any change in the copayment amount and cap, along
with the associated calculations explaining the basis for the increase,
will be published in a Federal Register notice. Thus, the intended
effect of this rule is to temporarily prevent increases in copayment
amounts and the copayment cap for veterans in priority categories 2
through 6, following which copayments and the copayment cap will
increase as prescribed in current Sec. 17.110(b).
At the same time, in light of the statutory requirement to share
costs under 38 U.S.C. 1722A and the distinctions noted above regarding
veterans in priority categories 2 through 6, we will not implement a
freeze on any copayment increase pursuant to the regulatory formula for
veterans in priority categories 7 and 8. A copayment increase for these
veterans will depend upon the Medical Consumer Price Index.
We note that we have not yet proposed a new methodology to
establish copayments and, for that reason, request public comment only
on the effect of this rulemaking, which is
[[Page 78826]]
to freeze the copayment amount for veterans in priority categories 2
through 6 while we study alternative methodologies to calculate
appropriate copayment amounts for all veterans.
Administrative Procedure Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3), the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs finds that there is good cause to dispense with the
opportunity for advance notice and opportunity for public comment and
good cause to publish this rule with an immediate effective date. As
stated above, this rule freezes at current rates the prescription drug
copayment that VA charges certain veterans. The Secretary finds that it
is impracticable and contrary to the public interest to delay this rule
for the purpose of soliciting advance public comment or to have a
delayed effective date. Increasing the copayment amount on January 1,
2012, might cause a significant financial hardship for some veterans.
For the above reason, the Secretary issues this rule as an interim
final rule. VA will consider and address comments that are received
within 60 days of the date this interim final rule is published in the
Federal Register.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by this rulemaking,
would represent the exclusive legal authority on this subject. No
contrary rules or procedures are authorized. All VA guidance must be
read to conform with this rulemaking if possible or, if not possible,
such guidance is superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as ``any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined and it has
been determined to be a significant regulatory action. Accordingly, the
Office of Management and Budget has reviewed this interim final rule.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This rule would have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this interim final rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This interim final rule will temporarily freeze the
copayments that certain veterans are required to pay for prescription
drugs furnished by VA. The interim final rule affects individuals and
has no impact on any small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), this rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number and title
for this rule are as follows: 64.005, Grants to States for Construction
of State Home Facilities; 64.007, Blind Rehabilitation Centers; 64.008,
Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits;
64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011, Veterans Dental Care;
64.012, Veterans Prescription Service; 64.013, Veterans Prosthetic
Appliances; 64.014, Veterans State Domiciliary Care; 64.015, Veterans
State Nursing Home Care; 64.016, Veterans State Hospital Care; 64.018,
Sharing Specialized Medical Resources; 64.019, Veterans Rehabilitation
Alcohol and Drug Dependence; 64.022, Veterans Home Based Primary Care;
and 64.024, VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on December 2, 2011, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure; Alcohol abuse; Alcoholism;
Claims; Day care; Dental health; Drug abuse; Foreign relations;
Government contracts; Grant programs--health; Grant programs--veterans;
Health care; Health facilities; Health professions; Health records;
Homeless; Medical and dental schools; Medical devices; Medical
research; Mental health programs; Nursing homes; Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements; Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Dated: December 15, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17
as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), and as noted in specific sections.
0
2. In Sec. 17.110, paragraphs (b)(1)(ii), and (b)(2), remove
``December 31, 2011'' each place it appears and add, in each place,
``December 31, 2012''.
[FR Doc. 2011-32532 Filed 12-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P