James Campbell National Wildlife Refuge, Honolulu County, HI; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment, 78939-78940 [2011-32390]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2011 / Notices
mutual responsibilities, designated
points of contact, and expectations for
handling predecisional information.
Agencies should also consider the
‘‘Factors for Determining Cooperating
Agency Status’’ in Attachment 1 to
CEQ’s January 30, 2002, Memorandum
for the Heads of Federal Agencies:
Cooperating Agencies in Implementing
the Procedural Requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act.
These documents are available at
https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/
guidance.html. BOEM/CSLC, as the lead
agencies, will not provide financial
assistance to cooperating agencies. Even
if an organization is not a cooperating
agency, opportunities will exist to
provide information and comments to
BOEM/CSLC during the normal public
input phases of the NEPA/EIS and
CEQA/EIR processes. If further
information about cooperating agency
status is needed, please contact Ms.
Susan Zaleski at (805) 389–7558 or
susan.zaleski@boem.gov.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments and Scoping Meetings
Scoping is an open process used for
identifying significant environmental
issues related to the proposed project.
Scoping also provides an opportunity to
identify appropriate mitigation
measures and alternatives to the
proposed project. Applicable agencies
will need to use the EIR/EIS when
considering related permits or other
approvals for the proposed project.
Federal, state and local government
agencies and other interested parties are
requested to send their written
comments on the scope of the EIR/EIS,
significant issues that should be
addressed and alternatives that should
be considered to one of the addresses in
the ADDRESSES section above.
Before including your address,
telephone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment, including
your personal identifying information,
may be made publicly available at any
time (including in the EIR/EIS and
posted on the Internet). Please note that
requests to withhold personal
identifying information should be made
prominently at the beginning of your
submission. While you may ask BOEM
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, BOEM
cannot guarantee that it will be able to
do so. The BOEM will not consider
anonymous comments, and BOEM will
make available for inspection, in their
entirety, all comments submitted by
organizations or businesses or by
individuals identifying themselves as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Dec 19, 2011
Jkt 226001
representatives of organizations or
businesses.
This notice and detailed proposed
project information will also be
available on the BOEM web page at
https://www.boem.gov/Carpinteria.aspx
and on the CSLC web page at
www.slc.ca.gov.
BOEM and CSLC will hold scoping
meetings to obtain additional comments
and information regarding the scope of
the EIR/EIS. Two public scoping
meetings will be conducted for the
proposed project to receive oral and/or
written testimony at the following times
and place: Thursday, January 19, 2012,
1–3 p.m. and 5–7 p.m., Carpinteria City
Council Chambers, 5775 Carpinteria
Avenue, Carpinteria, California 93013–
2697, Phone: (805) 684–5405.
A sign language interpreter will be
provided upon advance notification of
need. Such notification should be made
as soon as possible prior to the date of
the scoping meetings. If you need
reasonable accommodation for a
disability, as defined by the Federal
Americans with Disabilities Act and the
California Fair Employment and
Housing Act, to conduct business with
BOEM and CSLC staff conducting the
scoping meetings, please contact Susan
Zaleski at (805) 389–7558 at least 7 days
in advance of the scoping meetings to
arrange for such accommodation.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7, 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq. (1988), and § 15802 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000
et seq.).
Dated: December 14, 2011.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management .
[FR Doc. 2011–32484 Filed 12–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2011–N229; 1265–0000–10137–
S3]
James Campbell National Wildlife
Refuge, Honolulu County, HI; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Environmental Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and a finding of
no significant impact for the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78939
environmental assessment for the James
Campbell National Wildlife Refuge
(refuge). In this final CCP, we describe
how we will manage this refuge for the
next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the final CCP and the finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) and
environmental assessment (EA) by any
of the following methods. You may
request a hard copy or CD–ROM.
Agency Web site: Download the
documents at www.fws.gov/pacific/
planning.
Email:
FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘James Campbell Refuge CCP’’
in the subject line of the message.
Mail: David Ellis, Project Leader,
O‘ahu National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 66–590 Kamehameha
Highway, Room 2C, Hale‘iwa, HI 96712.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: O‘ahu
National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 66–
590 Kamehameha Highway, Room 2C,
Hale‘iwa, HI 96712.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Ellis, Project Leader, (808) 637–
6330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we announce the
completion of the CCP process for the
James Campbell National Wildlife
Refuge. The Service started this process
through a notice of intent in the Federal
Register on December 1, 2008 (73 FR
72826). We released the draft CCP/EA to
the public, announcing and requesting
comments in a notice of availability in
the Federal Register (76 FR 38414; June
30, 2011).
We announce our CCP decision and
the availability of a FONSI in
accordance with the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) and
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b))
requirements. We prepared a thorough
analysis of impacts, which we included
in an EA that accompanied the draft
CCP.
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering the refuge for the
next 15 years. Alternative C, as
described in the draft CCP, is the basis
for the CCP.
Background
The Refuge Administration Act, as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each refuge. The purpose for developing
a CCP is to provide refuge managers
with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
78940
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2011 / Notices
purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System, consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify compatible
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Refuge Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including Selected
Alternative
During our CCP planning process we
identified several issues. To address
these issues, we developed and
evaluated the following alternatives in
our draft CCP/EA.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative A, No Action
Under Alternative A, we would have
continued current management with no
changes. This includes focusing
threatened and endangered species
management on protection and
successful nesting. Public use programs
would remain virtually unchanged.
Refuge management units would remain
closed to general public entry except for
seasonal docent-guided tours and
Special Use Permits issued on a case-bycase basis for environmental education,
research, and other compatible uses.
Newly acquired refuge lands would
receive custodial oversight only, no
habitat restoration would occur, and no
additional visitor services would be
provided. Both current commercial
aquaculture leases would remain in
effect until 2023.
Alternative B, Partial Restoration and
Management of Refuge Expansion
Lands
Under Alternative B, current habitat
management programs focusing on
wetland management for endangered
waterbirds would have continued. On
newly acquired refuge lands, only the
highest priority wetlands and coastal
dunes would be restored and fenced to
exclude large predators. A Visitor
Services Plan (VSP) would be developed
to identify the types of compatible
wildlife-oriented activities we would
provide to the public as well as the sites
and locations for the infrastructure
needed to fully support public
programs. We would also identify new
special regulations in the VSP which
may be needed to protect sensitive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Dec 19, 2011
Jkt 226001
wildlife resources, the fragile coastline,
and the visiting public. During the
interim period until the VSP would be
prepared, the current public use
program would have slight increases in
opportunities for wildlife observation
and photography. The refuge would
participate and partner with other
agencies and the community of Kahuku
on projects to mitigate flood damage to
the local area, if practical and feasible.
Both current commercial aquaculture
leases would remain in effect until
2023.
Alternative C, Full Restoration and
Management of Refuge Expansion
Lands
In addition to management actions
identified in Alternative B, all wetlands,
coastal dunes/strand, and scrub/shrub
habitats would be restored and managed
under Alternative C. Trial use of
predator-proof fencing would be
initiated on selected dune or wetland
sites to protect seabirds or waterbirds.
Abandoned aquaculture facilities would
be cleaned up, and the habitat would be
restored to natural conditions or other
approved uses.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft
CCP/EA from June 30, 2011, to August
1, 2011 (76 FR 38414; June 30, 2011).
We received comment letters, forms,
and emails on the draft CCP/EA. To
address public comments, responsive
changes and clarifications were made to
the final CCP where appropriate.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we
received, we have selected Alternative C
for implementation. By implementing
Alternative C, we will intensively
manage endangered waterbird species
and their habitat at the Ki‘i and
˜
Punamano Units of the refuge with a
focus on protection and successful
nesting as part of the statewide effort to
implement the Hawaiian Waterbird
Recovery Plan. The unique and
sensitive coastal sand dunes and coastal
strand will be managed to protect and
enhance the area for native vegetation,
seabirds, other migratory birds,
endangered Hawaiian monk seals, and
green turtles. A VSP will be developed
to identify, evaluate, and select sites for
the infrastructure needed to fully
implement a safe and compatible
program for the public (to include roads,
parking areas, trails, overlooks, etc.).
The VSP will identify any new special
regulations needed to protect sensitive
wildlife resources, the fragile coastline,
and the visiting public. If funded, the
design and construction of a Visitor
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Center/Environmental Education facility
and refuge office will serve the public,
students, and refuge staff.
The refuge will continue to
participate and cooperate in community
and interagency efforts to address flood
damage reduction for the local area. We
will continue to evaluate our
infrastructure on the refuge, particularly
on newly acquired lands, to determine
if further changes can be made to help
mitigate flood damages. Both current
commercial aquaculture leases will
remain in effect until 2023 at which
time, by prior agreement, they will
expire.
All wetlands, coastal dunes/strand
and scrub/shrub habitats will be
restored and managed. Fencing will be
installed at appropriate locations
throughout the refuge to reduce the
devastating impacts of exotic predators
on native wildlife. Additionally, the
trial use of predator-proof fencing will
be initiated on selected coastal dunes
and/or wetland sites to protect nesting
seabirds and waterbirds. Abandoned
aquaculture facilities will be cleaned
up. As necessary, we will work with the
State to protect wildlife and standardize
public use regulations on the shoreline
adjacent to the refuge coastline.
Dated: November 16, 2011.
Michael Carrier,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region,
Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011–32390 Filed 12–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2011–N090;
FXRS12650100000S3–123–FF01R06000]
Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge,
Blaine, Cassia, Minidoka, and Power
Counties, ID; Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, intend to prepare a
comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)
for Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge.
We will also prepare an environmental
assessment (EA) to evaluate the
potential effects of various CCP
alternatives. We provide this notice in
compliance with our CCP policy to
advise the public, Federal and State
agencies, and Tribes of our intentions,
and to obtain public comments,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78939-78940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32390]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2011-N229; 1265-0000-10137-S3]
James Campbell National Wildlife Refuge, Honolulu County, HI;
Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant
Impact for Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and a
finding of no significant impact for the environmental assessment for
the James Campbell National Wildlife Refuge (refuge). In this final
CCP, we describe how we will manage this refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the final CCP and the
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) and environmental assessment
(EA) by any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or
CD-ROM.
Agency Web site: Download the documents at www.fws.gov/pacific/planning.
Email: FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. Include ``James Campbell Refuge
CCP'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: David Ellis, Project Leader, O`ahu National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 66-590 Kamehameha Highway, Room 2C, Hale`iwa, HI 96712.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: O`ahu National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 66-590 Kamehameha Highway, Room 2C, Hale`iwa, HI 96712.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Ellis, Project Leader, (808)
637-6330.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we announce the completion of the CCP process for
the James Campbell National Wildlife Refuge. The Service started this
process through a notice of intent in the Federal Register on December
1, 2008 (73 FR 72826). We released the draft CCP/EA to the public,
announcing and requesting comments in a notice of availability in the
Federal Register (76 FR 38414; June 30, 2011).
We announce our CCP decision and the availability of a FONSI in
accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act
of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) and National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We prepared a thorough analysis
of impacts, which we included in an EA that accompanied the draft CCP.
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering the refuge for
the next 15 years. Alternative C, as described in the draft CCP, is the
basis for the CCP.
Background
The Refuge Administration Act, as amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
[[Page 78940]]
purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify compatible wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Refuge Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including Selected Alternative
During our CCP planning process we identified several issues. To
address these issues, we developed and evaluated the following
alternatives in our draft CCP/EA.
Alternative A, No Action
Under Alternative A, we would have continued current management
with no changes. This includes focusing threatened and endangered
species management on protection and successful nesting. Public use
programs would remain virtually unchanged. Refuge management units
would remain closed to general public entry except for seasonal docent-
guided tours and Special Use Permits issued on a case-by-case basis for
environmental education, research, and other compatible uses. Newly
acquired refuge lands would receive custodial oversight only, no
habitat restoration would occur, and no additional visitor services
would be provided. Both current commercial aquaculture leases would
remain in effect until 2023.
Alternative B, Partial Restoration and Management of Refuge Expansion
Lands
Under Alternative B, current habitat management programs focusing
on wetland management for endangered waterbirds would have continued.
On newly acquired refuge lands, only the highest priority wetlands and
coastal dunes would be restored and fenced to exclude large predators.
A Visitor Services Plan (VSP) would be developed to identify the types
of compatible wildlife-oriented activities we would provide to the
public as well as the sites and locations for the infrastructure needed
to fully support public programs. We would also identify new special
regulations in the VSP which may be needed to protect sensitive
wildlife resources, the fragile coastline, and the visiting public.
During the interim period until the VSP would be prepared, the current
public use program would have slight increases in opportunities for
wildlife observation and photography. The refuge would participate and
partner with other agencies and the community of Kahuku on projects to
mitigate flood damage to the local area, if practical and feasible.
Both current commercial aquaculture leases would remain in effect until
2023.
Alternative C, Full Restoration and Management of Refuge Expansion
Lands
In addition to management actions identified in Alternative B, all
wetlands, coastal dunes/strand, and scrub/shrub habitats would be
restored and managed under Alternative C. Trial use of predator-proof
fencing would be initiated on selected dune or wetland sites to protect
seabirds or waterbirds. Abandoned aquaculture facilities would be
cleaned up, and the habitat would be restored to natural conditions or
other approved uses.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft CCP/EA from June 30, 2011, to
August 1, 2011 (76 FR 38414; June 30, 2011). We received comment
letters, forms, and emails on the draft CCP/EA. To address public
comments, responsive changes and clarifications were made to the final
CCP where appropriate.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we received, we have selected
Alternative C for implementation. By implementing Alternative C, we
will intensively manage endangered waterbird species and their habitat
at the Ki`i and Punaman[otilde] Units of the refuge with a focus on
protection and successful nesting as part of the statewide effort to
implement the Hawaiian Waterbird Recovery Plan. The unique and
sensitive coastal sand dunes and coastal strand will be managed to
protect and enhance the area for native vegetation, seabirds, other
migratory birds, endangered Hawaiian monk seals, and green turtles. A
VSP will be developed to identify, evaluate, and select sites for the
infrastructure needed to fully implement a safe and compatible program
for the public (to include roads, parking areas, trails, overlooks,
etc.). The VSP will identify any new special regulations needed to
protect sensitive wildlife resources, the fragile coastline, and the
visiting public. If funded, the design and construction of a Visitor
Center/Environmental Education facility and refuge office will serve
the public, students, and refuge staff.
The refuge will continue to participate and cooperate in community
and interagency efforts to address flood damage reduction for the local
area. We will continue to evaluate our infrastructure on the refuge,
particularly on newly acquired lands, to determine if further changes
can be made to help mitigate flood damages. Both current commercial
aquaculture leases will remain in effect until 2023 at which time, by
prior agreement, they will expire.
All wetlands, coastal dunes/strand and scrub/shrub habitats will be
restored and managed. Fencing will be installed at appropriate
locations throughout the refuge to reduce the devastating impacts of
exotic predators on native wildlife. Additionally, the trial use of
predator-proof fencing will be initiated on selected coastal dunes and/
or wetland sites to protect nesting seabirds and waterbirds. Abandoned
aquaculture facilities will be cleaned up. As necessary, we will work
with the State to protect wildlife and standardize public use
regulations on the shoreline adjacent to the refuge coastline.
Dated: November 16, 2011.
Michael Carrier,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011-32390 Filed 12-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P