Medical Benefits for Newborn Children of Certain Woman Veterans, 78569-78571 [2011-32264]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
claims with no multiple dependent
claims.
An applicant who wishes to
participate in the program must submit
a certification and request to participate
in the prioritized examination program,
preferably by using Form PTO/SB/424.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that, under 5
CFR 1320.3(h), Form PTO/SB/424 does
not collect ‘‘information’’ within the
meaning of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. Therefore, this rule making
does not impose additional collection
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act which are subject to
further review by OMB.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Courts, Freedom of
Information, Inventions and patents,
Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Small Businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 37 CFR part 1 is amended as
follows:
or reexamination proceedings. A request
for prioritized examination must also
comply with the requirements of
paragraph (e)(1) or paragraph (e)(2) of
this section.
(1) A request for prioritized
examination may be filed with an
original utility or plant nonprovisional
application under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) that
is complete as defined by § 1.51(b), with
any fees due under § 1.16 paid on filing.
If the application is a utility application,
it must be filed via the Office’s
electronic filing system. The request for
prioritized examination in compliance
with this paragraph must be present
upon filing of the application.
(2) A request for prioritized
examination may be filed with or after
a request for continued examination in
compliance with § 1.114. If the
application is a utility application, the
request must be filed via the Office’s
electronic filing system. The request
must be filed before the mailing of the
first Office action after the filing of the
request for continued examination
under § 1.114. Only a single such
request for prioritized examination
under this paragraph may be granted in
an application.
Dated: December 7, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2011–32434 Filed 12–16–11; 8:45 am]
PART 1—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PATENT CASES
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
1. The authority citation for 37 CFR
Part 1 continues to read as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2).
2. Section 1.102 is amended by
revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 1.102
Advancement of examination.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(e) A request for prioritized
examination under this paragraph must
comply with the requirements of this
paragraph and be accompanied by the
prioritized examination fee set forth in
§ 1.17(c), the processing fee set forth in
§ 1.17(i), and if not already paid, the
publication fee set forth in § 1.18(d). An
application for which prioritized
examination has been requested may
not contain or be amended to contain
more than four independent claims,
more than thirty total claims, or any
multiple dependent claim. Prioritized
examination under this paragraph will
not be accorded to international
applications that have not entered the
national stage under 35 U.S.C. 371,
design applications, reissue
applications, provisional applications,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:16 Dec 16, 2011
Jkt 226001
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO05
Medical Benefits for Newborn Children
of Certain Woman Veterans
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its regulation
concerning the medical benefits package
offered to veterans enrolled in the VA
health care system. This rulemaking
updates the regulation to conform to
amendments made by the enactment of
the Caregivers and Veteran Omnibus
Health Services Act of 2010, which
authorized VA to provide certain health
care services to a newborn child of a
woman veteran who is receiving
maternity care furnished by VA. Health
services for newborn care will be
authorized for no more than seven days
after the birth of the child if the veteran
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78569
delivered the child in a VA facility or
in another facility pursuant to a VA
contract for maternity services.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective December 19, 2011.
Applicability Date: This regulation is
applicable to medical care provided on
or after May 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holley Niethammer, Veterans Health
Administration, 3773 Cherry Creek
North Drive, Denver, Colorado 80209
(303) 370–5062. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5,
2010, the President signed into law the
Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus
Health Services Act of 2010, Public Law
111–163. Section 206 of the public law,
codified at 38 U.S.C. 1786, authorizes
VA to ‘‘furnish health care services
* * * to a newborn child of a woman
veteran who is receiving maternity care
furnished by [VA] for not more than
seven days after the birth of the child if
the veteran delivered the child in—(1) a
[VA] facility * * *; or (2) another
facility pursuant to a [VA] contract for
services relating to such delivery.’’ We
note that the statutory authority does
not extend to newborn children of
female partners or relatives of veterans
who are not veterans receiving
maternity care from VA. In other words,
this benefit is exclusive to newborn
children of female veterans who
themselves have been receiving
maternity care from VA prior to the
birth of the child and who otherwise
meet the requirements of the law. We
recognize that in some cases a newborn
child of a woman veteran may be placed
for adoption at the time of birth or
shortly thereafter, or may be abandoned.
Notwithstanding that the birth mother
may not be willing or able to raise the
child following birth, VA will provide
newborn care for the date of birth and
the first seven calendar days of life to
any child delivered by a woman veteran
who is receiving care under
§ 17.38(a)(1)(xiii). This is the broadest
reasonable interpretation of the
statutory authorization to provide care
to the newborn child of a woman
veteran, because the statute does not
clearly require that the woman veteran
be, or continue to be, the child’s legal
parent or guardian after birth.
We interpret section 1786 to mean
that newborn care is one of the health
care services authorized by Congress in
38 U.S.C. 1710. This rulemaking
implements this interpretation of
section 1786. We note that we have been
providing this care since the effective
date of the statute, May 5, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
78570
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
VA implemented section 1710 in
current 38 CFR 17.38, which prescribes
the types of medical care that are
included in what is known as the VA
‘‘medical benefits package.’’ This
rulemaking amends § 17.38(a) to include
newborn care as a service provided
under the medical benefits package.
Pursuant to current § 17.38(b), care
‘‘will be provided to individuals only if
it is determined by appropriate
healthcare professionals that the care is
needed to promote, preserve, or restore
the health of the individual and is in
accord with generally accepted
standards of medical practice.’’
For the above reasons, we amend 38
CFR 17.38(a)(1) consistent with section
1786 to provide: Newborn care, post
delivery, for a newborn child for the
date of birth plus seven calendar days
after the birth of the child when the
birth mother is a woman veteran
enrolled in VA health care and receiving
maternity care furnished by VA or
under authorization from VA and the
child is delivered either in a VA facility,
or in another facility pursuant to a VA
authorization for maternity care at VA
expense. VA will cover all medically
necessary care for the newborn(s) for the
date of birth plus the first seven
calendar days after birth, beginning on
the day after the child is born and
ending at midnight on the seventh full
calendar day thereafter. This is the
broadest reasonable interpretation of the
statute, which authorizes needed care
‘‘for not more than seven days after the
birth of the child.’’ 38 U.S.C. 1786(a).
The newborn care will include postdelivery care, including newborn care,
determined by appropriate healthcare
professionals necessary to promote,
preserve or restore the health of the
child in accordance with generally
accepted standards of medical practice
(§ 17.38(b)).
Finally, for clarity and continuity, we
are renumbering current
§ 17.38(a)(1)(xiv), which addresses the
completion of forms, to § 17.38(a)(1)(xv)
and inserting newborn care at
§ 17.38(a)(1)(xiv) to follow pregnancy
and delivery services at
§ 17.38(a)(1)(xiii).
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as revised by this final
rulemaking, represents VA’s
implementation of its legal authority on
this subject. Other than future
amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance
or procedures on this subject are
authorized. All VA guidance must be
read to conform with this rulemaking if
possible or, if not possible, such
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:16 Dec 16, 2011
Jkt 226001
guidance is superseded by this
rulemaking.
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is VA’s interpretive
regulatory guidance on a statutory
amendment to 38 U.S.C. 1786. This rule
does not create any new rights or duties.
Accordingly, this rule is being
published as a final rule pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A), which exempts
interpretive rules from the notice-andcomment requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553.
Because this rule merely interprets a
statute, it is effective as of the date of
the statute it interprets, i.e., May 5,
2010, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(2),
which exempts interpretive rules from
the delayed effective date requirements
of 5 U.S.C. 553.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that may result in the expenditure
by State, local, or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any given year. This
final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, or tribal governments, or on
the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory
flexibility analyses requirements of
sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, are
not applicable to this rule, because a
notice of proposed rulemaking is not
required for this rule. Even so, the
Secretary hereby certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. This final rule will not directly
affect any small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final
rule is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this final rule are
Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.010.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on November 4, 2011, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Caregivers program, Claims,
Health care, Health facilities, Newborns,
Pregnant women, Veterans.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 243 / Monday, December 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 13, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR Part 17 as
follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
2. Amend § 17.38 by:
a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(1)(xiv)
as paragraph (a)(1)(xv).
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(1)(xiv).
■ c. Revising the authority citation at
the end of the section.
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
■
§ 17.38
Medical benefits package.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(xiv) Newborn care, post delivery, for
a newborn child for the date of birth
plus seven calendar days after the birth
of the child when the birth mother is a
woman veteran enrolled in VA health
care and receiving maternity care
furnished by VA or under authorization
from VA and the child is delivered
either in a VA facility, or in another
facility pursuant to a VA authorization
for maternity care at VA expense.
*
*
*
*
*
(Authority 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1701, 1705,
1710, 1710A, 1721, 1722, 1782, 1786)
[FR Doc. 2011–32264 Filed 12–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8302–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2008–0155; A–1–FRL–
9248–1]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans: Oregon
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Oregon,
Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ). These revisions pertain to the
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)
maintenance plans prepared by ODEQ,
to maintain the 8-hour national ambient
air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone,
in the Portland portion of the Portland/
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:16 Dec 16, 2011
Jkt 226001
Vancouver Air Quality Maintenance
Area (Pdx/Van AQMA), and the SalemKeizer Area Transportation Study Air
Quality Area (SKATS). The 110(a)(1)
maintenance plans for these areas meet
CAA requirements and demonstrate that
each of the above mentioned areas will
be able to remain in attainment for the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
through 2015. As SKATS appears to be
significantly impacted by emissions
from the Portland area, an approved
plan for the Pdx/Van AQMA is one of
the control strategies for SKATS.
Therefore, EPA is approving the section
110(a) plans for the Portland portion of
the Pdx/Van AQMA and SKATS at the
same time.
Additionally, the EPA is approving
SIP revisions submitted by ODEQ that
phase out the State’s Vehicle Inspection
Program (VIP) enhanced BAR–31 test,
and eliminate the Gas Cap Pressure Test
and the Evaporative Purge Tests.
DATES: This action is effective on
January 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification Number: EPA–R10–OAR–
2008–0155. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://www.regulations.
gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be
publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics (AWT–107), 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Region
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. excluding Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krishna Viswanathan, (206) 553–2684,
or by email at
viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78571
I. Background
On May 6, 2010 (75 FR 24844), EPA
proposed to approve the State of
Oregon’s State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision that establishes a
maintenance plan for ozone in the
Portland portion of the Portland/
Vancouver Air Quality Maintenance
Area (Pdx/Van AQMA) and the SalemKeizer Area Transportation Study Air
Quality Area (SKATS). This plan
provides measures that enable
continued attainment of the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for at least 10 years after
designation, and includes a 2002 baseyear emissions inventory. EPA also
proposed approval of SIP revisions
submitted by Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ) that
phase out the State’s VIP enhanced
BAR–31 test, and eliminate the Gas Cap
Pressure Test and the Evaporative Purge
Tests. No comments were received on
the proposed approval of this plan. EPA
is, accordingly, taking final action in
this notice to approve the plan as
discussed in the proposed action
without change.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the section 110(a)(1)
maintenance plan and supporting rules
for Portland and Salem, Oregon
submitted on May 22, 2007, and
described further in the Technical
Support document, as revisions to the
Oregon SIP. EPA is approving the
maintenance plan and supporting rules
for the Portland Portion of the Pdx/Van
AQMA and SKATS. EPA is also taking
final action to approve revisions to the
Oregon SIP pertaining to motor vehicle
testing provisions (Oregon SIP: Volume
2—section 5.4.7—Test Procedures and
Standards and supporting rules). These
revisions will not interfere with the
attainment or maintenance of the
current CO or ozone NAAQS and meet
the requirements of section 110(a)(1)
and section 110(l) of the CAA.
EPA will retain the tables in 40 CFR
part 81 that identify the 1-hour ozone
designation and classification status of
each area as of the effective date of the
8-hour designations. (See 70 FR 44471.)
Therefore, although the SKATS area is
a State maintenance area for the 1-hour
ozone standard, 40 CFR part 81 will
retain the nonattainment designation for
the SKATS area. EPA believes that the
CAA does not require a separate 110(l)
analysis to replace 1-hour
nonattainment NSR with PSD once an
area has been redesignated to attainment
for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, or
has an approved 110(a)(1) maintenance
plan for that standard. (See 75 FR
64677). In sum, EPA does not require
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78569-78571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32264]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AO05
Medical Benefits for Newborn Children of Certain Woman Veterans
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its
regulation concerning the medical benefits package offered to veterans
enrolled in the VA health care system. This rulemaking updates the
regulation to conform to amendments made by the enactment of the
Caregivers and Veteran Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010, which
authorized VA to provide certain health care services to a newborn
child of a woman veteran who is receiving maternity care furnished by
VA. Health services for newborn care will be authorized for no more
than seven days after the birth of the child if the veteran delivered
the child in a VA facility or in another facility pursuant to a VA
contract for maternity services.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective December 19, 2011.
Applicability Date: This regulation is applicable to medical care
provided on or after May 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holley Niethammer, Veterans Health
Administration, 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, Denver, Colorado 80209
(303) 370-5062. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5, 2010, the President signed into
law the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010,
Public Law 111-163. Section 206 of the public law, codified at 38
U.S.C. 1786, authorizes VA to ``furnish health care services * * * to a
newborn child of a woman veteran who is receiving maternity care
furnished by [VA] for not more than seven days after the birth of the
child if the veteran delivered the child in--(1) a [VA] facility * * *;
or (2) another facility pursuant to a [VA] contract for services
relating to such delivery.'' We note that the statutory authority does
not extend to newborn children of female partners or relatives of
veterans who are not veterans receiving maternity care from VA. In
other words, this benefit is exclusive to newborn children of female
veterans who themselves have been receiving maternity care from VA
prior to the birth of the child and who otherwise meet the requirements
of the law. We recognize that in some cases a newborn child of a woman
veteran may be placed for adoption at the time of birth or shortly
thereafter, or may be abandoned. Notwithstanding that the birth mother
may not be willing or able to raise the child following birth, VA will
provide newborn care for the date of birth and the first seven calendar
days of life to any child delivered by a woman veteran who is receiving
care under Sec. 17.38(a)(1)(xiii). This is the broadest reasonable
interpretation of the statutory authorization to provide care to the
newborn child of a woman veteran, because the statute does not clearly
require that the woman veteran be, or continue to be, the child's legal
parent or guardian after birth.
We interpret section 1786 to mean that newborn care is one of the
health care services authorized by Congress in 38 U.S.C. 1710. This
rulemaking implements this interpretation of section 1786. We note that
we have been providing this care since the effective date of the
statute, May 5, 2010.
[[Page 78570]]
VA implemented section 1710 in current 38 CFR 17.38, which
prescribes the types of medical care that are included in what is known
as the VA ``medical benefits package.'' This rulemaking amends Sec.
17.38(a) to include newborn care as a service provided under the
medical benefits package. Pursuant to current Sec. 17.38(b), care
``will be provided to individuals only if it is determined by
appropriate healthcare professionals that the care is needed to
promote, preserve, or restore the health of the individual and is in
accord with generally accepted standards of medical practice.''
For the above reasons, we amend 38 CFR 17.38(a)(1) consistent with
section 1786 to provide: Newborn care, post delivery, for a newborn
child for the date of birth plus seven calendar days after the birth of
the child when the birth mother is a woman veteran enrolled in VA
health care and receiving maternity care furnished by VA or under
authorization from VA and the child is delivered either in a VA
facility, or in another facility pursuant to a VA authorization for
maternity care at VA expense. VA will cover all medically necessary
care for the newborn(s) for the date of birth plus the first seven
calendar days after birth, beginning on the day after the child is born
and ending at midnight on the seventh full calendar day thereafter.
This is the broadest reasonable interpretation of the statute, which
authorizes needed care ``for not more than seven days after the birth
of the child.'' 38 U.S.C. 1786(a). The newborn care will include post-
delivery care, including newborn care, determined by appropriate
healthcare professionals necessary to promote, preserve or restore the
health of the child in accordance with generally accepted standards of
medical practice (Sec. 17.38(b)).
Finally, for clarity and continuity, we are renumbering current
Sec. 17.38(a)(1)(xiv), which addresses the completion of forms, to
Sec. 17.38(a)(1)(xv) and inserting newborn care at Sec.
17.38(a)(1)(xiv) to follow pregnancy and delivery services at Sec.
17.38(a)(1)(xiii).
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by this
final rulemaking, represents VA's implementation of its legal authority
on this subject. Other than future amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance or procedures on this subject
are authorized. All VA guidance must be read to conform with this
rulemaking if possible or, if not possible, such guidance is superseded
by this rulemaking.
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is VA's interpretive regulatory guidance on a
statutory amendment to 38 U.S.C. 1786. This rule does not create any
new rights or duties. Accordingly, this rule is being published as a
final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A), which exempts interpretive
rules from the notice-and-comment requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553. Because
this rule merely interprets a statute, it is effective as of the date
of the statute it interprets, i.e., May 5, 2010, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(2), which exempts interpretive rules from the delayed effective
date requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) as ``any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any given year.
This final rule will have no such effect on State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses requirements
of sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612, are not applicable to this rule, because a notice of proposed
rulemaking is not required for this rule. Even so, the Secretary hereby
certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This final rule will not directly
affect any small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
final rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this final rule are Veterans Medical Care
Benefits; 64.010.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on November 4, 2011, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Caregivers program, Claims,
Health care, Health facilities, Newborns, Pregnant women, Veterans.
[[Page 78571]]
Dated: December 13, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR Part 17 as
follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.38 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(1)(xiv) as paragraph (a)(1)(xv).
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(1)(xiv).
0
c. Revising the authority citation at the end of the section.
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 17.38 Medical benefits package.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(xiv) Newborn care, post delivery, for a newborn child for the date
of birth plus seven calendar days after the birth of the child when the
birth mother is a woman veteran enrolled in VA health care and
receiving maternity care furnished by VA or under authorization from VA
and the child is delivered either in a VA facility, or in another
facility pursuant to a VA authorization for maternity care at VA
expense.
* * * * *
(Authority 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1701, 1705, 1710, 1710A, 1721,
1722, 1782, 1786)
[FR Doc. 2011-32264 Filed 12-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8302-01-P