Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to 403.1, 77901-77903 [2011-32137]
Download as PDF
77901
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
3. In appendix C to part 4022, Rate Set
219, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
■
Appendix C to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for Private-Sector
Payments
*
For plans with a valuation
date
Rate set
On or after
*
Before
*
*
i1
2–1–12
1.25
i2
*
4.00
*
1–1–12
*
Deferred annuities
(percent)
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
*
219
*
i3
4.00
n1
*
n2
*
*
4.00
7
8
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3),
1341, 1344, 1362.
PART 4044—ALLOCATION OF
ASSETS IN SINGLE–EMPLOYER
PLANS
Appendix B to Part 4044—Interest
Rates Used to Value Benefits
5. In appendix B to part 4044, a new
entry for January–March 2012, as set
forth below, is added to the table.
*
■
4. The authority citation for part 4044
continues to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
The values of it are:
For valuation dates occurring in the month—
it
*
*
*
January–March 2012 ........................................................
Issued in Washington, DC, on this 8th day
of December 2011.
Laricke Blanchard,
Deputy Director for Policy, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011–32184 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1087]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River,
Mile 389.4 to 403.1
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Upper Mississippi
River, from Mile 389.4 to 403.1,
extending the entire width of the river
located on the Iowa and Illinois border.
This safety zone is needed to protect
bridge span movement operations on
the Upper Mississippi River. Entry into
this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Dec 14, 2011
it
for t =
1–20
*
0.0370
>20
*
0.0374
Effective Date: this rule is
effective in the CFR from December 15,
2011 until 7 p.m. CST on December 21,
2011. This rule is effective with actual
notice for purposes of enforcement
beginning 7 a.m. on November 22, 2011.
DATES:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1087 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2011–1087 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
ACTION:
for t =
Jkt 226001
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Chief Petty Officer
Ryan Christensen, Sector Upper
Mississippi River Response Department
at telephone (314) 269–2721, email
Ryan.D.Christensen@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
it
*
for t =
*
N/A
N/A
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not using the
NPRM process. The Coast Guard
received notice that bridge span
movement operations would take place
on November 22, 2011. This short notice
did not allow for the time needed to
publish a NPRM and provide for a
comment period. The Coast Guard
determined that a safety zone is
necessary to protect vessels and
mariners from the hazards associated
with transporting the bridge spans.
Delaying this rule and the necessary
protections by publishing a NPRM
would be impracticable and would
unnecessarily delay the bridge span
operations. This rule is needed to
protect vessels and mariners from the
safety hazards associated with
transporting bridge spans in the vicinity
of Mile 389.4 to 403.1 on the Upper
Mississippi River.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
E:\FR\FM\15DER1.SGM
15DER1
77902
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The Coast Guard received
notice that the bridge spans would be
transported and impact navigation on
November 22, 2011. This short notice
did not allow for a 30 day notice period.
The Coast Guard determined that a
safety zone is necessary to protect
vessels and mariners from the hazards
associated with transporting the bridge
spans. Delaying the rule’s effective date
would be impracticable because
immediate action is needed to protect
vessels and mariners from the safety
hazards associated with transporting
bridge spans in the vicinity of Mile
389.4 to 403.1 on the Upper Mississippi
River.
Basis and Purpose
On November 22, 2011, Ames
Construction will be transporting bridge
spans between Mile 389.4 to 403.1 on
the Upper Mississippi River located on
the Iowa and Illinois border. This event
presents safety hazards to the navigation
of vessels between Mile 389.4 to 403.1,
extending the entire width of the river.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone for all waters of
the Upper Mississippi River, Mile 389.4
to 403.1, extending the entire width of
the river and located on the Iowa and
Illinois border. Entry into this zone is
prohibited to all vessels and persons
except participants and those persons
and vessels specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River. This rule is effective
from 7 a.m. on November 22, 2011
through 7 p.m. CST on December 21,
2011. The currently scheduled date for
bridge span operations and enforcement
of this rule is November 22, 2011. Dates
of bridge span operations may change
within the November 22, 2011 through
December 21, 2011 effective period for
this rule. The Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River will inform the public
through broadcast notice to mariners of
all safety zone requirements, changes,
and enforcement periods.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Dec 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders.
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the Upper
Mississippi River on the Iowa and
Illinois border between Mile 389.4 to
403.1, from 7 a.m. on November 22,
2011 through 7 p.m. CST on December
21, 2011. This safety zone will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because this rule will only be in effect
for a limited period of time.
If you are a small business entity and
are significantly affected by this
regulation, please contact Chief Petty
Officer Ryan Christensen, Sector Upper
Mississippi River at (314) 269–2721.
Federalism
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small businesses. If
you wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–(888) REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
E:\FR\FM\15DER1.SGM
15DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that Order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction. This rule establishes a
temporary safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are required for this rule,
and will be provided as indicated in the
ADDRESSES Section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Dec 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. A new temporary § 165.T08–1087 is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T08–1087 Safety Zone; Upper
Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to 403.1.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Upper
Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to 403.1,
extending the entire width of the
waterway and located on the Iowa and
Illinois border.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective
from 7 a.m. on November 22, 2011
through 7 p.m. CST on December 21,
2011.
(c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule
will be enforced during bridge span
operations scheduled for 7 a.m. through
12:00 noon CST on November 22, 2011.
Additional bridge span operations occur
within the period from November 22,
2011 through December 21, 2011. The
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River will inform the public of the
enforcement periods, planned dates of
bridge span operations and any safety
zone changes through broadcast notice
to mariners.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.23
of this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River or a designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative. The Captain
of the Port Upper Mississippi River
representative may be contacted at (314)
269–2332.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi
River or their designated representative.
Designated Captain of the Port
representatives include United States
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77903
Dated: November 22, 2011.
B.L. Black,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2011–32137 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0937–201164; FRL–
9506–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; Kentucky; Redesignation of
the Kentucky Portion of the CincinnatiHamilton, OH-KY-IN 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area
to Attainment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve a request submitted on January
27, 2011, from the Commonwealth of
Kentucky, through the Kentucky Energy
and Environment Cabinet, Division for
Air Quality (DAQ), to redesignate the
Kentucky portion of the CincinnatiHamilton, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Tri-state
Cincinnati-Hamilton Area’’) fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment
area to attainment for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). The Tri-state
Cincinnati-Hamilton Area is comprised
of Boone, Campbell, and Kenton
Counties in Kentucky (hereafter referred
to as the ‘‘Northern Kentucky Area’’ or
‘‘Area’’); Butler, Clermont, Hamilton,
and Warren Counties in Ohio; and a
portion of Dearborn County in Indiana.
EPA’s approval of the redesignation
request is based on the determination
that Kentucky has met the criteria for
redesignation to attainment set forth in
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
Additionally, EPA is approving a
revision to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to include
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 maintenance
plan for the Northern Kentucky Area
that contains the new 2015 and 2021
motor vehicle emission budgets
(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
PM2.5 for that Area. On December 9,
2010, and January 25, 2011,
respectively, Ohio and Indiana
submitted requests to redesignate their
portion of the Tri-state CincinnatiHamilton Area to attainment for the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is taking
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15DER1.SGM
15DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77901-77903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32137]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1087]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to 403.1
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Upper Mississippi River, from Mile 389.4 to 403.1,
extending the entire width of the river located on the Iowa and
Illinois border. This safety zone is needed to protect bridge span
movement operations on the Upper Mississippi River. Entry into this
zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River or a designated representative.
DATES: Effective Date: this rule is effective in the CFR from December
15, 2011 until 7 p.m. CST on December 21, 2011. This rule is effective
with actual notice for purposes of enforcement beginning 7 a.m. on
November 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1087 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket
Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2011-1087
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in
the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Chief Petty Officer Ryan Christensen,
Sector Upper Mississippi River Response Department at telephone (314)
269-2721, email Ryan.D.Christensen@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not using the NPRM process. The Coast Guard received
notice that bridge span movement operations would take place on
November 22, 2011. This short notice did not allow for the time needed
to publish a NPRM and provide for a comment period. The Coast Guard
determined that a safety zone is necessary to protect vessels and
mariners from the hazards associated with transporting the bridge
spans. Delaying this rule and the necessary protections by publishing a
NPRM would be impracticable and would unnecessarily delay the bridge
span operations. This rule is needed to protect vessels and mariners
from the safety hazards associated with transporting bridge spans in
the vicinity of Mile 389.4 to 403.1 on the Upper Mississippi River.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for
[[Page 77902]]
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. The Coast Guard received notice that the bridge spans
would be transported and impact navigation on November 22, 2011. This
short notice did not allow for a 30 day notice period. The Coast Guard
determined that a safety zone is necessary to protect vessels and
mariners from the hazards associated with transporting the bridge
spans. Delaying the rule's effective date would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to protect vessels and mariners from
the safety hazards associated with transporting bridge spans in the
vicinity of Mile 389.4 to 403.1 on the Upper Mississippi River.
Basis and Purpose
On November 22, 2011, Ames Construction will be transporting bridge
spans between Mile 389.4 to 403.1 on the Upper Mississippi River
located on the Iowa and Illinois border. This event presents safety
hazards to the navigation of vessels between Mile 389.4 to 403.1,
extending the entire width of the river.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all
waters of the Upper Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to 403.1, extending
the entire width of the river and located on the Iowa and Illinois
border. Entry into this zone is prohibited to all vessels and persons
except participants and those persons and vessels specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River. This
rule is effective from 7 a.m. on November 22, 2011 through 7 p.m. CST
on December 21, 2011. The currently scheduled date for bridge span
operations and enforcement of this rule is November 22, 2011. Dates of
bridge span operations may change within the November 22, 2011 through
December 21, 2011 effective period for this rule. The Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River will inform the public through broadcast
notice to mariners of all safety zone requirements, changes, and
enforcement periods.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the Upper Mississippi River on the Iowa and Illinois border
between Mile 389.4 to 403.1, from 7 a.m. on November 22, 2011 through 7
p.m. CST on December 21, 2011. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because this rule will only be in effect for a limited period of time.
If you are a small business entity and are significantly affected
by this regulation, please contact Chief Petty Officer Ryan
Christensen, Sector Upper Mississippi River at (314) 269-2721.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small businesses. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-(888) REG-
FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
[[Page 77903]]
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
establishes a temporary safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are required for this rule, and will be provided as
indicated in the ADDRESSES Section.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T08-1087 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-1087 Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to
403.1.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Upper Mississippi River, Mile 389.4 to 403.1, extending the entire
width of the waterway and located on the Iowa and Illinois border.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on November
22, 2011 through 7 p.m. CST on December 21, 2011.
(c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule will be enforced during
bridge span operations scheduled for 7 a.m. through 12:00 noon CST on
November 22, 2011. Additional bridge span operations occur within the
period from November 22, 2011 through December 21, 2011. The Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River will inform the public of the
enforcement periods, planned dates of bridge span operations and any
safety zone changes through broadcast notice to mariners.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
zone must request permission from the Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River or a designated representative. The Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River representative may be contacted at (314)
269-2332.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River or their designated
representative. Designated Captain of the Port representatives include
United States Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, and petty officers.
Dated: November 22, 2011.
B.L. Black,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2011-32137 Filed 12-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P