Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and Orchid Cellmark Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment, 78008-78009 [2011-32125]
Download as PDF
78008
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 111 0155]
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings and Orchid Cellmark Inc.;
Analysis of Proposed Agreement
Containing Consent Orders To Aid
Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed Consent Agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘LabCorp/Orchid, File No.
111 0155’’ on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
labcorporchidconsent, by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Barnett (202) 326–2362), FTC,
Bureau of Competition, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and § 2.34 the Commission Rules
of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for December 8, 2011), on
the World Wide Web, at https://
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 Dec 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper
copy can be obtained from the FTC
Public Reference Room, Room 130–H,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, either in person
or by calling (202) 326–2222.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before January 9, 2012. Write ’’LabCorp/
Orchid, File No. 111 0155’’ on your
comment. Your comment—including
your name and your state—will be
placed on the public record of this
proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the public Commission
Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals’ home contact
information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web
site.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ’’[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is obtained
from any person and which is privileged
or confidential,‘‘ as provided in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2).
In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
1 In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must
include the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record. See
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
labcorporchidconsent by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ’’LabCorp/Orchid, File No. 111
0155’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail or deliver it to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580. If possible, submit your
paper comment to the Commission by
courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before January 9, 2012. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
I. Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, subject to
final approval, an Agreement
Containing Consent Orders (‘‘Consent
Agreement’’) with Laboratory
Corporation of America Holdings
(‘‘LabCorp’’), which is designed to
remedy the anticompetitive effects of its
proposed acquisition of Orchid
Cellmark Inc. (‘‘Orchid’’). Under the
terms of the Consent Agreement,
LabCorp is required to divest Orchid’s
U.S. government paternity testing
services business to DNA Diagnostics
Center (‘‘ADDC’’). The Consent
Agreement also requires LabCorp to
facilitate the assignment of Orchid’s
current government contracts to provide
paternity testing services. The assets
involved include all of the necessary
relevant equipment, books and records,
and other information necessary for
DDC to bid competitively for future
government paternity testing services
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
business. With this Consent Agreement,
the competition that would otherwise be
eliminated through the proposed
acquisition of Orchid by LabCorp will
be fully preserved.
The proposed Consent Agreement has
been placed on the public record for
thirty days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
the public record. After thirty days, the
Commission will again review the
proposed Consent Agreement and the
comments received, and will decide
whether it should withdraw from the
proposed Consent Agreement, modify it,
or make final the accompanying
Decision and Order (‘‘Order’’).
Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated April 5, 2011, LabCorp
intends to acquire Orchid in a cash
tender offer valued at approximately
$85.4 million. Both parties provide
paternity testing services to government
agencies, and are by far the largest
providers of those services in the United
States. The Commission’s complaint
alleges that the proposed acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 7
of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. § 45, in U.S. markets for the
provision of paternity testing services to
state and local government agencies.
The proposed Consent Agreement
remedies the alleged violations by
replacing the lost competition in the
relevant market that would result from
the acquisition.
II. The Products and Structure of the
Markets
DNA paternity testing services for
government agencies is a relevant
product market in which to analyze the
competitive effects of the proposed
acquisition. No other types of paternity
testing services, like blood testing, meet
government agencies’ requirements.
LabCorp and Orchid are the two
principal competitors in the United
States for government paternity testing
services contracts—they are the only
two firms that consistently bid for these
contracts, they account for the
overwhelming majority of awarded
contracts, and they have been the
winner and runner-up in most of these
bids. As a result, LabCorp and Orchid
accounted for the overwhelming
majority of the business in this roughly
$27 million market.
III. Entry
The anticompetitive impact of
LabCorp’s acquisition of Orchid is not
likely to be averted by entry or
expansion from other DNA testing labs.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:28 Dec 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
Most other DNA testing laboratories do
not have the scale or the experience
needed to compete effectively for
government contracts.
IV. Effects of the Acquisition
The proposed acquisition likely
would result in significant
anticompetitive harm in the highlyconcentrated relevant market for
government paternity testing services.
LabCorp and Orchid are the only
significant competitors in this highlyconcentrated market. Over the past five
years, LabCorp and Orchid consistently
participated in the vast majority of state
and local government bids conducted in
the United States, almost always as
head-to-head competitors. They bid
more often, and typically at lower
prices, than any other labs. The
acquisition will eliminate this
significant head-to-head competition
and is likely to result in higher prices
for government paternity testing
services contracts.
V. The Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement
remedies the competitive concerns
raised by the transaction by requiring
the parties to divest Orchid’s U.S.
government paternity testing business to
DDC. LabCorp also must divest testing
equipment along with contract and
service information necessary to enable
DDC to replicate Orchid’s market
position. LabCorp also must facilitate
the assignment of all existing
government paternity testing services
contracts to DDC. This divestiture
preserves competition that would
otherwise be eliminated as a result of
the acquisition.
The proposed Consent Agreement
also contains several provisions
designed to ensure that the divestiture
is successful. LabCorp must provide lab
testing services to DDC until the assets
are fully transferred and Orchid’s
government contracts are assigned to
DDC. In addition, DDC will have access
to the personnel and information that
are at Orchid’s Dayton facility. Finally,
LabCorp cannot use or retain any
confidential business information
except as necessary to maintain the
assets for DDC’s use during the
transition period. To prevent improper
sharing of information, a manager of the
business being transferred who reports
directly to Commission staff will be put
in place.
DDC is a respected provider of
paternity testing services for both
private and government customers. DDC
operates a testing laboratory located in
Fairfield, Ohio that, with the divested
assets and business, will enable DDC to
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78009
effectively replace Orchid as the
primary competitor to LabCorp. DDC
has the resources and experience
necessary to acquire the divested assets
and assume responsibility for Orchid’s
existing government contracts.
If the Commission determines that
either DDC is not an acceptable acquirer
of the assets to be divested, or that the
manner of the divestitures is not
acceptable, LabCorp must unwind the
divestiture and divest the assets within
six months of the date the Order
becomes final to another Commissionapproved acquirer. If LabCorp fails to
divest the assets within the six months,
the Commission may appoint a trustee
to divest the relevant assets.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent Agreement, and it is
not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Consent
Agreement or to modify its terms in any
way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–32125 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090–0294; Docket No.
2011–0001; Sequence 4]
Information Collection; Implementation
of Information Technology Security
Provision
General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding a new OMB
information clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve a new information
collection requirement regarding
Implementation of Information
Technology Security Provision.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the GSAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78008-78009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32125]
[[Page 78008]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 111 0155]
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and Orchid Cellmark
Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid
Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent
agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``LabCorp/Orchid, File
No. 111 0155'' on your comment, and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/labcorporchidconsent, by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment
on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex
D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Barnett (202) 326-2362), FTC,
Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Sec. 2.34 the
Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that
the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to
cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a
period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page
(for December 8, 2011), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before January 9, 2012.
Write ''LabCorp/Orchid, File No. 111 0155'' on your comment. Your
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable,
on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals' home contact information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web site.
Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number,
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive health information, like medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not
include any ''[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information
which is obtained from any person and which is privileged or
confidential,`` as provided in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do
not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales
statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/labcorporchidconsent by following the instructions on the Web-based
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you
also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ''LabCorp/Orchid, File No.
111 0155'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or deliver it
to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before January 9, 2012. You can find more
information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
I. Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject
to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (``Consent
Agreement'') with Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
(``LabCorp''), which is designed to remedy the anticompetitive effects
of its proposed acquisition of Orchid Cellmark Inc. (``Orchid''). Under
the terms of the Consent Agreement, LabCorp is required to divest
Orchid's U.S. government paternity testing services business to DNA
Diagnostics Center (``ADDC''). The Consent Agreement also requires
LabCorp to facilitate the assignment of Orchid's current government
contracts to provide paternity testing services. The assets involved
include all of the necessary relevant equipment, books and records, and
other information necessary for DDC to bid competitively for future
government paternity testing services
[[Page 78009]]
business. With this Consent Agreement, the competition that would
otherwise be eliminated through the proposed acquisition of Orchid by
LabCorp will be fully preserved.
The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record
for thirty days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments
received during this period will become part of the public record.
After thirty days, the Commission will again review the proposed
Consent Agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it
should withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement, modify it, or make
final the accompanying Decision and Order (``Order'').
Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 5, 2011,
LabCorp intends to acquire Orchid in a cash tender offer valued at
approximately $85.4 million. Both parties provide paternity testing
services to government agencies, and are by far the largest providers
of those services in the United States. The Commission's complaint
alleges that the proposed acquisition, if consummated, would violate
Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5
of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 45, in
U.S. markets for the provision of paternity testing services to state
and local government agencies. The proposed Consent Agreement remedies
the alleged violations by replacing the lost competition in the
relevant market that would result from the acquisition.
II. The Products and Structure of the Markets
DNA paternity testing services for government agencies is a
relevant product market in which to analyze the competitive effects of
the proposed acquisition. No other types of paternity testing services,
like blood testing, meet government agencies' requirements. LabCorp and
Orchid are the two principal competitors in the United States for
government paternity testing services contracts--they are the only two
firms that consistently bid for these contracts, they account for the
overwhelming majority of awarded contracts, and they have been the
winner and runner-up in most of these bids. As a result, LabCorp and
Orchid accounted for the overwhelming majority of the business in this
roughly $27 million market.
III. Entry
The anticompetitive impact of LabCorp's acquisition of Orchid is
not likely to be averted by entry or expansion from other DNA testing
labs. Most other DNA testing laboratories do not have the scale or the
experience needed to compete effectively for government contracts.
IV. Effects of the Acquisition
The proposed acquisition likely would result in significant
anticompetitive harm in the highly-concentrated relevant market for
government paternity testing services. LabCorp and Orchid are the only
significant competitors in this highly-concentrated market. Over the
past five years, LabCorp and Orchid consistently participated in the
vast majority of state and local government bids conducted in the
United States, almost always as head-to-head competitors. They bid more
often, and typically at lower prices, than any other labs. The
acquisition will eliminate this significant head-to-head competition
and is likely to result in higher prices for government paternity
testing services contracts.
V. The Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement remedies the competitive concerns
raised by the transaction by requiring the parties to divest Orchid's
U.S. government paternity testing business to DDC. LabCorp also must
divest testing equipment along with contract and service information
necessary to enable DDC to replicate Orchid's market position. LabCorp
also must facilitate the assignment of all existing government
paternity testing services contracts to DDC. This divestiture preserves
competition that would otherwise be eliminated as a result of the
acquisition.
The proposed Consent Agreement also contains several provisions
designed to ensure that the divestiture is successful. LabCorp must
provide lab testing services to DDC until the assets are fully
transferred and Orchid's government contracts are assigned to DDC. In
addition, DDC will have access to the personnel and information that
are at Orchid's Dayton facility. Finally, LabCorp cannot use or retain
any confidential business information except as necessary to maintain
the assets for DDC's use during the transition period. To prevent
improper sharing of information, a manager of the business being
transferred who reports directly to Commission staff will be put in
place.
DDC is a respected provider of paternity testing services for both
private and government customers. DDC operates a testing laboratory
located in Fairfield, Ohio that, with the divested assets and business,
will enable DDC to effectively replace Orchid as the primary competitor
to LabCorp. DDC has the resources and experience necessary to acquire
the divested assets and assume responsibility for Orchid's existing
government contracts.
If the Commission determines that either DDC is not an acceptable
acquirer of the assets to be divested, or that the manner of the
divestitures is not acceptable, LabCorp must unwind the divestiture and
divest the assets within six months of the date the Order becomes final
to another Commission-approved acquirer. If LabCorp fails to divest the
assets within the six months, the Commission may appoint a trustee to
divest the relevant assets.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent Agreement, and it is not intended to constitute an
official interpretation of the proposed Consent Agreement or to modify
its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32125 Filed 12-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P