Special Procedural Rules Governing Periods When the National Labor Relations Board Lacks a Quorum of Members, 77699-77701 [2011-32085]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations Executive Order 12866. Therefore, it requires no regulatory assessment. Drafting Information Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this final rule. List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 Wine. The Regulatory Amendment For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. 2. Subpart C is amended by adding § 9.222 to read as follows: ■ Subpart C—Approved American Viticultural Areas mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES § 9.222 Naches Heights. (a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this section is ‘‘Naches Heights’’. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, ‘‘Naches Heights’’ is a term of viticultural significance. (b) Approved maps. The five United States Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the Naches Heights viticultural area are titled: (1) Selah, Wash., 1958, photorevised 1985; (2) Yakima West, Wash., 1958, photorevised 1985; (3) Wiley City, Wash., 1958, photorevised 1985; (4) Naches, Wash., 1958, photorevised 1978; and (5) Tieton, Wash., 1971, photoinspected 1981. (c) Boundary. The Naches Heights viticultural area is located in Yakima County, Washington. The boundary of the Naches Heights viticultural area is as described below: (1) The beginning point is on the Selah map at the intersection of the Burlington Northern single-track rail line and the Congdon (Schuler) Canal, section 9, T13N/R18E. From the beginning point, proceed southsouthwesterly along the single rail line, onto the Yakima West map, approximately 0.35 mile to the first intersection of the rail line with an unnamed creek, locally known as Cowiche Creek, section 9, T13N/R18E; then (2) Proceed upstream (westerly) along Cowiche Creek, onto the Wiley City map VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:15 Dec 13, 2011 Jkt 226001 and then onto the Naches map, approximately 6.25 miles to the confluence of the North and South Forks of Cowiche Creek, south of Mahoney Road, section 3, T13N/R17E; then (3) Proceed upstream (northwesterly) along the North Fork of Cowiche Creek approximately 1.6 miles to the intersection of the North Fork with Livengood Road, section 34, T14N/ R17E; then (4) Proceed north and northwest on Livengood Road approximately 1.12 miles until the road turns west and joins Forney Road, and continue approximately 1.02 miles along Forney Road to the intersection of Forney Road with the North Fork of Cowiche Creek, section 28 northwest corner, T14N/ R17E; then (5) Proceed upstream (northwesterly) along the North Fork of Cowiche Creek approximately 1.8 miles to the intersection of the North Fork with the section 17 west boundary line, T14N/ R17E; then (6) Proceed straight north along the section 17 west boundary line to its intersection with Cox Road, and then continue north along Cox Road to the intersection of Cox Road with Rosenkranz Road, section 17 northwest corner, T14N/R17E; then (7) Proceed west on Rosenkranz Road, onto the Tieton map, approximately 0.6 mile to the intersection of Rosenkranz Road with North Tieton Road, section 7 south boundary line, T14N/R17E; then (8) Proceed north on North Tieton Road approximately 0.5 mile to the intersection of North Tieton Road with Dilley Road, section 7, T14N/R17E; then (9) Proceed west on Dilley Road approximately 0.5 mile to the intersection of Dilley Road with Franklin Road, section 7 west boundary line and the R16E and R17E common line, T14N; then (10) Proceed north on Franklin Road approximately 0.8 mile to the intersection of Franklin Road with Schenk Road and the section 6 west boundary line, T14N/R16E; then (11) Proceed west on Schenk Road approximately 0.55 mile to the intersection of Schenk Road with Section 1 Road, section 1, T14N/R16E; then (12) Proceed straight north from the intersection of Schenk Road and Section 1 Road approximately 2.2 miles to the 1,600-foot elevation line, section 36, T15N/R16E; then (13) Proceed easterly and then southeasterly along the 1,600-foot elevation line, onto the Naches map, approximately 7.5 miles to the intersection of the 1,600-foot elevation PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 77699 line with the section 26 north boundary line, T14N/R17E; then (14) Proceed straight east along the section 26 north boundary line approximately 0.25 mile to the intersection of the section 26 north boundary line with the 1,400-foot elevation line, T14N/R17E; then (15) Proceed southeasterly along the 1,400-foot elevation line approximately 2.5 miles to the intersection of the 1,400-foot elevation line with Young Grade Road, section 31, T14N/R18E; then (16) Proceed east in a straight line approximately 0.15 mile to the Congdon (Schuler) Canal, which closely parallels the 1,300-foot elevation line, section 31, T14N/R18E; and then (17) Proceed southeasterly along the Congdon (Schuler) Canal, onto the Selah map, approximately 3.25 miles, returning to the beginning point, section 9, T13N/R18E. Signed: September 28, 2011. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. Approved: October 20, 2011. Timothy E. Skud, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–32017 Filed 12–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–31–P NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 29 CFR Part 102 Special Procedural Rules Governing Periods When the National Labor Relations Board Lacks a Quorum of Members AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board. ACTION: Final rule. The National Labor Relations Board is revising its rules governing the consideration of certain pleadings that ordinarily require action by a quorum of at least three Board Members. The revisions are being adopted to facilitate, insofar as it is possible, the normal functioning of the Agency during periods when the number of Board members falls below three, the number required to establish a quorum of the Board. The effect of the revisions is to provide the public with avenues for resolving certain issues, while deferring full review by the Board until a quorum has been restored. DATES: Effective December 14, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lester A. Heltzer, Executive Secretary, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM 14DER1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES 77700 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street NW., Room 11600, Washington, DC 20570. Telephone (202) 273–1067 (this is not a toll-free number), 1–(866) 315–6572 (TTY/TDD). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Labor Relations Board is revising its rules governing the consideration of certain pleadings that ordinarily require action by a quorum of at least three Board Members. The revisions are being adopted to facilitate, insofar as it is possible, the normal functioning of the Agency during periods when the number of Board members falls below three, the number required to establish a quorum of the Board. See 29 U.S.C. 153(b); New Process Steel v. NLRB, —U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2635 (2010). No Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is required with respect to this rules revision, as it falls under the Administrative Procedure Act’s exception to the NPRM requirement for regulatory actions involving agency organization, procedure, or practice. See 5 U.S.C. 553. At present, the rules of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) provide only for the adjudication of cases and the issuance of decisions by the Board when it is composed of three or more members, which constitutes the Congressionally-designated quorum of the Board. In New Process Steel v. NLRB, supra, 130 S. Ct. 2635, the Supreme Court held that Congress empowered the Board to delegate its powers to no fewer than three members, and that, to maintain a valid quorum, a membership of three must be maintained. Id. at 2640. It can be anticipated that, from time to time, the number of individuals appointed by the President and confirmed by Congress to serve as members of the National Labor Relations Board may fall below three. Thus, the Board has determined that the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act will best be served, and the Board’s Congressional mandate will best be carried out, if its rules were revised to refer, under those circumstances only, certain motions and appeals to other offices of the Board, while preserving for the parties the right to ultimate review by the Board when a quorum is restored. In this regard, the Board has identified certain classes of disputes that are amendable to processing through other Board offices; i.e., Motions for Summary Judgment, Motions for Default Judgment, Motions for Dismissal of Complaints, and requests for permission to file special appeals will be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for ruling, VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:15 Dec 13, 2011 Jkt 226001 and administrative and procedural motions will be referred to the Executive Secretary for ruling. In all cases of such referrals, parties will retain the right to full Board review by filing a request for review or exceptions to the ruling at the appropriate time. Normal time limits for filing will apply, and the case will be considered on its merits by the Board upon restoration of a quorum. It is anticipated that these changes in the rules will serve the interest of the public and the parties in the speedy resolution of disputes, where that resolution is possible, as well as in the litigation of cases before administrative law judges with as few disruptions as possible. In addition, the Board anticipates that, as in some cases the parties will determine that no exception is warranted, these revisions may serve to reduce the backlog of cases that the Board will face when a quorum is restored. Executive Order 12866 The regulatory review provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not apply to independent regulatory agencies. However, even if they did, the proposed changes in the Board’s rules would not be classified as ‘‘significant rules’’ under Section 6 of Executive Order 12866, because they will not result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic or foreign markets. Accordingly, no regulatory impact assessment is required. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Regulatory Flexibility Act Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required for procedural rules, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) pertaining to regulatory PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 flexibility analysis do not apply to these rules. However, even if the Regulatory Flexibility Act were to apply, the NLRB certifies that these rules will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities as they merely provide parties with avenues for expeditiously pursuing and defending claims before the Board under certain narrow circumstances. Paperwork Reduction Act These rules are not subject to Section 3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501) since they do not contain any new information collection requirements. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Because these rules relate to Agency procedure and practice and merely modify the Agency’s internal processing of certain motions in narrow circumstances, the Board has determined that the Congressional review provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801) do not apply. List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 102 Administrative practice and procedure; Labor-management relations. To provide for the normal operation of the Board during periods when the number of Board members is insufficient to constitute a quorum, the Board amends 29 CFR part 102 as follows: PART 102—RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8 1. The authority citation for 29 CFR part 102 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: Section 6, National Labor Relations Act, as amended (29 U.S.C. 151, 156). Section 102.117 also issued under Section 552(a)(4)(A) of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)). Sections 102.143 through 102.155 also issued under Section 504(c)(1) of the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1)). ■ 2. Add subpart X to read as follows: Subpart X—Special Procedures When the Board Lacks a Quorum Sec. 102.178 Normal operations should continue. 102.179 Motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge. 102.180 Requests for special permission to appeal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge. 102.181 Administrative and procedural requests referred to Executive Secretary. E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM 14DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations Subpart X—Special Procedures When the Board Lacks a Quorum § 102.178 Normal operations should continue. The policy of the National Labor Relations Board is that during any period when the Board lacks a quorum normal Agency operations should continue to the greatest extent permitted by law. § 102.179 Motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge. During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, all motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal filed or pending pursuant to § 102.50 of this part shall be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge in Washington, DC, for ruling. Such rulings by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and orders in connection therewith, shall not be appealed directly to the Board, but shall be considered by the Board in reviewing the record if exception to the ruling or order is included in the statement of exceptions filed with the Board pursuant to § 102.46 of this part. § 102.180 Requests for special permission to appeal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge. During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, any request for special permission to appeal filed or pending pursuant to § 102.26 of this part shall be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge in Washington, DC, for ruling. Such rulings by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and orders in connection therewith, shall not be appealed directly to the Board, but shall be considered by the Board in reviewing the record if exception to the ruling or order is included in the statement of exceptions filed with the Board pursuant to § 102.46. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES § 102.181 Administrative and procedural requests referred to Executive Secretary. During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, administrative and procedural requests that would normally be filed with the Office of the Executive Secretary for decision by the Board prior to the filing of a request for review under § 102.67 of this part, or exceptions under §§ 102.46 and 102.69 of this part, shall be referred to the Executive Secretary for ruling. Such rulings by the Executive Secretary, and orders in connection therewith, shall not be appealed directly to the Board, but shall be considered by the Board if such matters are raised by a party in its request for review or exceptions. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:15 Dec 13, 2011 Jkt 226001 Signed in Washington, DC, on December 8, 2011. Mark Gaston Pearce, Chairman. [FR Doc. 2011–32085 Filed 12–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 and Part 70 [EPA–R07–OAR–2011–0822; FRL–9505–8] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits Program. EPA is approving a revision to the Missouri rule entitled ‘‘Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process Information.’’ These revisions align the State’s reporting requirements with the Federal Air Emissions Reporting Requirements Rule (AERR). DATES: This direct final rule will be effective February 13, 2012, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by January 13, 2012. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2011–0822, by one of the following methods: 1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. Email: bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Amy Bhesania, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2011– 0822. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https:// SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 77701 www.regulations.gov or email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The https:// www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through https:// www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https:// www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in https:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. Outline I. What is being addressed in this document? II. What action is EPA taking? I. What is being addressed in this document? EPA is approving revisions to the Missouri SIP and Operating Permits Program submitted to EPA on August 31, 2010. On December 17, 2008, EPA finalized the Air Emissions Reporting E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM 14DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77699-77701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32085]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

29 CFR Part 102


Special Procedural Rules Governing Periods When the National 
Labor Relations Board Lacks a Quorum of Members

AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Labor Relations Board is revising its rules 
governing the consideration of certain pleadings that ordinarily 
require action by a quorum of at least three Board Members. The 
revisions are being adopted to facilitate, insofar as it is possible, 
the normal functioning of the Agency during periods when the number of 
Board members falls below three, the number required to establish a 
quorum of the Board. The effect of the revisions is to provide the 
public with avenues for resolving certain issues, while deferring full 
review by the Board until a quorum has been restored.

DATES: Effective December 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lester A. Heltzer, Executive 
Secretary,

[[Page 77700]]

National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street NW., Room 11600, 
Washington, DC 20570. Telephone (202) 273-1067 (this is not a toll-free 
number), 1-(866) 315-6572 (TTY/TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Labor Relations Board is 
revising its rules governing the consideration of certain pleadings 
that ordinarily require action by a quorum of at least three Board 
Members. The revisions are being adopted to facilitate, insofar as it 
is possible, the normal functioning of the Agency during periods when 
the number of Board members falls below three, the number required to 
establish a quorum of the Board. See 29 U.S.C. 153(b); New Process 
Steel v. NLRB, --U.S.--, 130 S.Ct. 2635 (2010). No Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPRM) is required with respect to this rules revision, as 
it falls under the Administrative Procedure Act's exception to the NPRM 
requirement for regulatory actions involving agency organization, 
procedure, or practice. See 5 U.S.C. 553.
    At present, the rules of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) 
provide only for the adjudication of cases and the issuance of 
decisions by the Board when it is composed of three or more members, 
which constitutes the Congressionally-designated quorum of the Board. 
In New Process Steel v. NLRB, supra, 130 S. Ct. 2635, the Supreme Court 
held that Congress empowered the Board to delegate its powers to no 
fewer than three members, and that, to maintain a valid quorum, a 
membership of three must be maintained. Id. at 2640. It can be 
anticipated that, from time to time, the number of individuals 
appointed by the President and confirmed by Congress to serve as 
members of the National Labor Relations Board may fall below three. 
Thus, the Board has determined that the purposes of the National Labor 
Relations Act will best be served, and the Board's Congressional 
mandate will best be carried out, if its rules were revised to refer, 
under those circumstances only, certain motions and appeals to other 
offices of the Board, while preserving for the parties the right to 
ultimate review by the Board when a quorum is restored. In this regard, 
the Board has identified certain classes of disputes that are amendable 
to processing through other Board offices; i.e., Motions for Summary 
Judgment, Motions for Default Judgment, Motions for Dismissal of 
Complaints, and requests for permission to file special appeals will be 
referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for ruling, and 
administrative and procedural motions will be referred to the Executive 
Secretary for ruling. In all cases of such referrals, parties will 
retain the right to full Board review by filing a request for review or 
exceptions to the ruling at the appropriate time. Normal time limits 
for filing will apply, and the case will be considered on its merits by 
the Board upon restoration of a quorum.
    It is anticipated that these changes in the rules will serve the 
interest of the public and the parties in the speedy resolution of 
disputes, where that resolution is possible, as well as in the 
litigation of cases before administrative law judges with as few 
disruptions as possible. In addition, the Board anticipates that, as in 
some cases the parties will determine that no exception is warranted, 
these revisions may serve to reduce the backlog of cases that the Board 
will face when a quorum is restored.

Executive Order 12866

    The regulatory review provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not 
apply to independent regulatory agencies. However, even if they did, 
the proposed changes in the Board's rules would not be classified as 
``significant rules'' under Section 6 of Executive Order 12866, because 
they will not result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 
million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, 
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or 
geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of 
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based 
enterprises in domestic or foreign markets. Accordingly, no regulatory 
impact assessment is required.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and 
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed 
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required for procedural 
rules, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.) pertaining to regulatory flexibility analysis do not apply to 
these rules. However, even if the Regulatory Flexibility Act were to 
apply, the NLRB certifies that these rules will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities as 
they merely provide parties with avenues for expeditiously pursuing and 
defending claims before the Board under certain narrow circumstances.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    These rules are not subject to Section 3504(h) of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501) since they do not contain any new 
information collection requirements.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    Because these rules relate to Agency procedure and practice and 
merely modify the Agency's internal processing of certain motions in 
narrow circumstances, the Board has determined that the Congressional 
review provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act (5 U.S.C. 801) do not apply.

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 102

    Administrative practice and procedure; Labor-management relations.

    To provide for the normal operation of the Board during periods 
when the number of Board members is insufficient to constitute a 
quorum, the Board amends 29 CFR part 102 as follows:

PART 102--RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8

0
1. The authority citation for 29 CFR part 102 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  Section 6, National Labor Relations Act, as amended 
(29 U.S.C. 151, 156). Section 102.117 also issued under Section 
552(a)(4)(A) of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 
552(a)(4)(A)). Sections 102.143 through 102.155 also issued under 
Section 504(c)(1) of the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. 504(c)(1)).


0
2. Add subpart X to read as follows:
Subpart X--Special Procedures When the Board Lacks a Quorum
Sec.
102.178 Normal operations should continue.
102.179 Motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal 
referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge.
102.180 Requests for special permission to appeal referred to Chief 
Administrative Law Judge.
102.181 Administrative and procedural requests referred to Executive 
Secretary.

[[Page 77701]]

Subpart X--Special Procedures When the Board Lacks a Quorum


Sec.  102.178  Normal operations should continue.

    The policy of the National Labor Relations Board is that during any 
period when the Board lacks a quorum normal Agency operations should 
continue to the greatest extent permitted by law.


Sec.  102.179  Motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or 
dismissal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge.

    During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, all motions for 
default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal filed or pending 
pursuant to Sec.  102.50 of this part shall be referred to the Chief 
Administrative Law Judge in Washington, DC, for ruling. Such rulings by 
the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and orders in connection therewith, 
shall not be appealed directly to the Board, but shall be considered by 
the Board in reviewing the record if exception to the ruling or order 
is included in the statement of exceptions filed with the Board 
pursuant to Sec.  102.46 of this part.


Sec.  102.180  Requests for special permission to appeal referred to 
Chief Administrative Law Judge.

    During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, any request for 
special permission to appeal filed or pending pursuant to Sec.  102.26 
of this part shall be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge in 
Washington, DC, for ruling. Such rulings by the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, and orders in connection therewith, shall not be appealed 
directly to the Board, but shall be considered by the Board in 
reviewing the record if exception to the ruling or order is included in 
the statement of exceptions filed with the Board pursuant to Sec.  
102.46.


Sec.  102.181  Administrative and procedural requests referred to 
Executive Secretary.

    During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, administrative and 
procedural requests that would normally be filed with the Office of the 
Executive Secretary for decision by the Board prior to the filing of a 
request for review under Sec.  102.67 of this part, or exceptions under 
Sec. Sec.  102.46 and 102.69 of this part, shall be referred to the 
Executive Secretary for ruling. Such rulings by the Executive 
Secretary, and orders in connection therewith, shall not be appealed 
directly to the Board, but shall be considered by the Board if such 
matters are raised by a party in its request for review or exceptions.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on December 8, 2011.
Mark Gaston Pearce,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2011-32085 Filed 12-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.