Seagoing Barges, 77712-77716 [2011-32007]
Download as PDF
77712
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
*
*
*
*
*
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Polymer
CAS No.
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand delivery: Same as mail
*
*
*
*
*
address above, between 9 a.m. and
2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-,
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
polymer with butyl 2Federal holidays. The telephone number
propenoate and
ethenylbenzene, minimum
is (202) 366–9329.
number average molecular
To avoid duplication, please use only
weight (in amu), 17,000 ........ 25036–16–2
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
*
*
*
*
*
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
[FR Doc. 2011–32072 Filed 12–13–11; 8:45 am]
below for instructions on submitting
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
comments.
2. In § 180.960, the table is amended
by adding alphabetically the following
polymers to read as follows:
■
A. Submitting Comments
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0363]
If
you have questions on this rule, email
or call LT Douglas Tindall, Coast Guard;
telephone (202) 372–1411, email
Douglas.Tindall@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
RIN 1625–AB71
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0363),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0363’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
Seagoing Barges
Table of Contents
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for
comments.
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Regulatory Information
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Discussion of the Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0363’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. If you do not have access to the
Internet, you may also view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and
188
AGENCY:
By this direct final rule, the
Coast Guard is revising regulations for
the inspection and certification of
seagoing barges to align with the
language of the applicable statutes. The
statutory language exempts certain
seagoing barges from inspection.
Through this rule, we seek to make the
language of the regulation consistent
with the language of the statute.
DATES: This rule is effective April 12,
2012, unless an adverse comment, or
notice of intent to submit an adverse
comment, is either submitted to our
online docket via https://
www.regulations.gov on or before
February 13, 2012 or reaches the Docket
Management Facility by that date. If an
adverse comment, or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, is received
by February 13, 2012, we will withdraw
this direct final rule and publish a
timely notice of withdrawal in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0363 using any one of the
following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
77713
D. Public Meeting
IV. Basis and Purpose
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one to the docket using one of the
methods specified under ADDRESSES. In
your request, explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard has the delegated
authority to carry out the
responsibilities related to vessel
inspection enumerated in 46 U.S.C.
3301–3318. See also 46 U.S.C. 2104;
DHS Delegation 0170.1(92b). Pursuant
to this authority, the Coast Guard has
issued regulations regarding inspection
and certification of seagoing barges in
46 CFR parts 90 and 91.
In 1983, sec. 2101(32), Public Law 98–
89, 97 Stat. 500 (46 U.S.C. 2101)
redefined ‘‘seagoing barge’’ as a non
self-propelled vessel of at least 100 gross
tons making voyages beyond the
Boundary Line. Coast Guard regulations
at 46 CFR 91.01–10(c) do not reflect the
language change and instead refer to
seagoing barges as vessels ‘‘on the high
seas or ocean.’’ The purpose of this rule
is to change the language in 46 CFR
91.01–10 from ‘‘on the high seas or
ocean’’ to ‘‘beyond the Boundary Line’’
to reflect the language of Public Law 98–
89.
In 1993, Congress exempted from
inspection seagoing barges that are
unmanned and not carrying hazardous
material as cargo, or carrying a
flammable or combustible liquid,
including oil, in bulk. See Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 1993, Public Law
103–206, 107 Stat. 2419 (46 U.S.C.
3302(m)). In 1993, the Coast Guard
stopped requiring the specified seagoing
barges to be inspected to conform with
Public Law 103–206. However, the
Coast Guard did not amend its
regulations to reflect the exemption. The
purpose of this rule is to change the
language concerning seagoing barges in
46 CFR 90.05–25, 46 CFR 91.01–10, and
the vessel inspection tables in 46 CFR
parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, and 188 to reflect
the exemption created by Public Law
103–206.
permissible for seagoing barges that
make voyages beyond the ‘‘Boundary
Line’’ vice the current language of ‘‘high
seas or ocean.’’
Coast Guard regulations contained in
46 CFR 90.05–25 dictates inspection
and certification requirements for
seagoing barges, but currently do not
reflect the exemptions enacted by Public
Law 103–206. In this rule, the Coast
Guard modifies the language of 46 CFR
90.05–25 exempting seagoing barges
from inspection and certification that
are unmanned, and not carrying
hazardous material as cargo, or a
flammable or combustible liquid,
including oil, in bulk as enacted by
Public Law 103–206.
To promote consistency and
readability we are revising 46 CFR
91.01–10(c)(1)(i), 46 CFR 91.01–
10(c)(1)(ii), and 46 CFR 91.01–10(c)(2)
to replace the language ‘‘non selfpropelled vessels of 100 gross tons and
over’’ with the term ‘‘seagoing barge’’ as
enacted by Public Law 98–89 and
contained in 46 CFR 90.10–36.
The remaining revisions are intended
to make the language of the vessel
inspection table published in the CFR
consistent with the language of the
revised regulations. The vessel
inspection table is a visual
representation of when vessels must be
inspected, and is organized by type of
vessel, method of propulsion, cargo,
mission, etc. This is a single table that
is published in the multiple sections of
the CFR that deal with inspection of
vessels, namely 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 30,
70, 90, and 188. We are revising the
vessel inspection table by removing
from row 4, column 4 the text ‘‘All
seagoing barges except those covered by
columns 2 and 3.’’ and adding, in its
place, the text ‘‘All manned seagoing
barges.’’
V. Discussion of the Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
Coast Guard regulations contained in
46 CFR 91.01–10(c) provide for
modification of the period of validity of
the certificate of inspection for seagoing
barges that: (1) Proceed on the high seas
or ocean for the sole purpose of
changing place of employment; or (2)
make rare or infrequent voyages on the
high seas or ocean and returning to the
port of departure. This language does
not reflect the language of Public Law
98–89 that redefined ‘‘seagoing barge’’
as a non self-propelled vessel of at least
100 gross tons making voyages beyond
the Boundary Line. In this rule, the
Coast Guard changes the language of
&46 CFR 91.01–10(c)(1)(i) and (ii) to
clarify that modification of the period of
validity of the certificate of inspection is
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
II. Abbreviations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
NVIC Navigation and Vessel Inspection
Circular
Pub. L. Public Law
U.S.C. United States Code
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Regulatory Information
We are publishing this direct final
rule under 33 CFR 1.05–55 because we
do not expect an adverse comment. If no
adverse comment or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment is received
by February 13, 2012, this rule will
become effective as stated in the DATES
section. In that case, approximately 30
days before the effective date, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register stating that no adverse
comment was received and confirming
that this rule will become effective as
scheduled. However, if we receive an
adverse comment or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the withdrawal of
all or part of this direct final rule. If an
adverse comment applies only to part of
this rule (e.g., to an amendment, a
paragraph, or a section) and it is
possible to remove that part without
defeating the purpose of this rule, we
may adopt, as final, those parts of this
rule on which no adverse comment was
received. We will withdraw the part of
this rule that was the subject of an
adverse comment. If we decide to
proceed with a rulemaking following
receipt of an adverse comment, we will
publish a separate notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a new
opportunity for comment.
A comment is considered adverse if
the comment explains why this rule or
a part of this rule would be
inappropriate, including a challenge to
its underlying premise or approach, or
would be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735
(Regulatory Planning and Review), as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, 76 FR 3821 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review), and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order
12866. The Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77714
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Budget has not reviewed it under these
Executive Orders.
Sec. 2102 (32) of Public Law 98–89
redefined ‘‘seagoing barge’’ to mean ‘‘a
non-self-propelled vessel of at least 100
gross tons making voyages beyond the
Boundary Line.’’
Sec. 311 of Public Law 103–206
amended 46 U.S.C. 3302 to exempt
certain seagoing barges from inspection
and certification when the barges are
unmanned and not carrying hazardous
material as cargo, or a flammable or
combustible liquid, including oil, in
bulk. This rule will align 46 CFR 90.05–
24, 46 CFR 91.01–10, and the vessel
inspection table in 46 CFR 2, 24, 30, 70,
90, and 188 with Public Law 98–89 and
Public Law 103–206.
Based on Public Law 98–89 and
Public Law 103–206, seagoing barges
that do not need inspection are those
that meet all of the following
characteristics:
1. Coastwise or oceans route as per
sec. 2102(32), Public Law 98–89;
2. 100 gross tons or greater as per sec.
2102 (32), Public Law 98–89;
3. Unmanned as per sec. 311, Public
Law 103–206; and
4. Not carrying hazardous material as
cargo, or a flammable or combustible
liquid, including oil, in bulk as per sec.
311, Public Law 103–206.
Because the Coast Guard is aligning
the text of the regulations with the
current inspections laws enacted in
1993, only barges that are manned, or
carrying hazardous material as cargo or
a flammable or combustible liquid,
including oil, in bulk are inspected. If
owners or operators choose to
voluntarily inspect barges that are
exempt from inspection, these owners
or operators do so voluntarily and
would voluntarily incur the cost. We
estimate that there are no additional
costs to implement this rule.
The benefit of this rule is in making
the CFR consistent with the current law.
As this statutory change has been in
effect for more than 18 years, we expect
this rule will not provide additional cost
savings to industry.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
As previously discussed, the purpose
of this rule is to align the language
concerning seagoing barges in 46 CFR
90.05–25, 46 CFR 91.01–10, and the
vessel inspection tables in 46 CFR parts
2, 24, 30, 70, 90, and 188 with the
language of Public Law 98–89 and
Public Law 103–206. Public Law 98–89
redefined ‘‘seagoing barge’’ as a nonself-propelled vessel of at least 100 gross
tons making voyages beyond the
Boundary Line. Public Law 103–206
exempted certain seagoing barges from
inspection and certification that are
unmanned, and not carrying hazardous
material as cargo, or carrying a
flammable or combustible liquid,
including oil, in bulk.
This rule does not result in additional
costs for small entities because the Coast
Guard is aligning the text of the
regulations with the current law. Since
exempted barges have not been
inspected for more than 10 years, this
rule will impose no additional impacts
(costs or cost savings) to small entities.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Comments submitted in
response to this finding will be
evaluated under the criteria in the
‘‘Regulatory Information’’ section of this
preamble.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under sec. 213(a) of the Contract with
America Act of 1996, Public Law104–
121, 110 Stat. 847, we want to assist
small entities in understanding this rule
so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking process. If the rule will
affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance,
please consult LT Douglas Tindall at
(202) 372–1411 or by email at
Douglas.Tindall@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1-(888) 734–3247).
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if the rule has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference With Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
the docket where indicated under
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to
use voluntary consensus standards in
their regulatory activities unless the
agency provides Congress, through the
Office of Management and Budget, with
an explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(a) of the Instruction.
This rule involves amendments to
regulations which are editorial or
procedural and merely align the text of
the regulations with current law and
Coast Guard practice. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
§ 24.01–5
ADDRESSES.
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
77715
■
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 2
Marine safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
46 CFR Part 24
5. The authority citation for part 30
continues to read as follows:
46 CFR Part 30
Cargo vessels, Foreign relations,
Hazardous materials transportation,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seamen.
46 CFR Part 70
Marine safety, Passenger vessels,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 90
Cargo vessels, Marine safety.
46 CFR Part 91
Cargo vessels, Marine safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 188
Marine safety, Oceanographic
research vessels.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends
46 CFR parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and
188 as follows:
PART 2—VESSEL INSPECTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
46 U.S.C. 2110, 3103, 3205, 3306, 3307, 3703;
46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; E.O. 12234, 45 FR
58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1. Subpart 2.45 also issued under
the Act Dec. 27, 1950, Ch. 1155, secs. 1, 2,
64 Stat. 1120 (see 46 U.S.C. App. Note prec.
1).
[Amended]
2. In Table 2.01–7(a), row 4, column
4, of § 2.01–7, remove the text ‘‘All
seagoing barges except those covered by
columns 2 and 3.’’ and add, in its place,
the text ‘‘All manned seagoing barges.’’.
■
PART 24—GENERAL PROVISIONS
3. The authority citation for part 24
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306, 4104,
4302; Pub. L. 103–206; 107 Stat. 2439; E.O.
12234; 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p.
277; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
PART 30—GENERAL PROVISIONS
■
Marine safety.
§ 2.01–7
[Amended]
4. In Table 24.01–5(a), row 4, column
4, of § 24.01–5, remove the text ‘‘All
seagoing barges except those covered by
columns 2 and 3.’’ and add, in its place,
the text ‘‘All manned seagoing barges.’’.
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703;
Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C.
5103, 5106; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1; Section
30.01–2 also issued under the authority of
44 U.S.C. 3507; Section 30.01–05 also issued
under the authority of Sec. 4109, Pub. L.
101–380, 104 Stat. 515.
§ 30.01–5
[Amended]
6. In Table 30.05–1(d), row 4, column
4, of § 30.01–5, remove the text ‘‘All
seagoing barges except those covered by
columns 2 and 3.’’ and add, in its place,
the text ‘‘All manned seagoing barges.’’.
■
PART 70—GENERAL PROVISIONS
7. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L.
103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103,
5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1; Section
70.01–15 also issued under the authority of
44 U.S.C. 3507.
§ 70.05–1
[Amended]
8. In Table 70.05–1(a), row 4, column
4, of § 70.05–1, remove the text ‘‘All
seagoing barges except those covered by
columns 2 and 3.’’ and add, in its place,
the text ‘‘All manned seagoing barges.’’.
■
PART 90—GENERAL PROVISIONS
9. The authority citation for part 90
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L.
103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103,
5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 90.05–1
[Amended]
10. In Table 90.05–1(a), row 4, column
4, of § 90.05–1, remove the text ‘‘All
seagoing barges except those covered by
columns 2 and 3.’’ and add, in its place,
the text ‘‘All manned seagoing barges.’’.
■ 11. Revise § 90.05–25(a) to read as
follows:
■
§ 90.05–25
Seagoing barge.
(a) All non-self-propelled vessels of
100 gross tons or more are subject to
inspection when proceeding beyond the
Boundary Line if they—
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77716
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Carry a hazardous material as
cargo; or
(2) Carry a flammable or combustible
liquid, including oil, in bulk; or
(3) Are manned.
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PART 91—INSPECTION AND
CERTIFICATION
RIN 2130–AC19
12. The authority citation for part 91
continues to read as follows:
13. Amend § 91.01–10 as follows:
a. Revise paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii);
and
■ b. In paragraph (c)(2), remove the
words ‘‘seagoing barges of 100 gross
tons and over,’’ and add, in their place,
the words ‘‘inspected seagoing barges’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 91.01–10 Period of validity for a
Certificate of Inspection
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) * * *
(i) Inspected seagoing barges
proceeding beyond the Boundary Line
for the sole purpose of changing place
of employment.
(ii) Inspected seagoing barges making
rare or infrequent voyages beyond the
Boundary Line and returning to the port
of departure.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 188—GENERAL PROVISIONS
14. The authority citation for part 188
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306; Pub. L
103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103,
5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
[Amended]
15. In Table 188.05–1(a), row 4,
column 4, of § 188.05–1, remove the text
‘‘All seagoing barges except those
covered by columns 2 and 3.’’ and add,
in its place, the text ‘‘All manned
seagoing barges.’’.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Dated: December 6, 2011.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and
Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2011–32007 Filed 12–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
[Docket No. FRA–2009–0108; Notice No. 2]
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C.
3205, 3306, 3307; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701;
Executive Order 12234; 45 FR 58801; 3 CFR,
1980 Comp., p. 277; Executive Order 12777,
56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
49 CFR Part 269
Alternate Passenger Rail Service Pilot
Program
■
§ 188.05–1
Federal Railroad Administration
This final rule is in response
to a statutory mandate that FRA
complete a rulemaking proceeding to
develop a pilot program that permits a
rail carrier or rail carriers that own
infrastructure over which Amtrak
operates certain passenger rail service
routes to petition FRA to be considered
as a passenger rail service provider over
such a route in lieu of Amtrak for a
period not to exceed five years after the
date of enactment of the Passenger Rail
Investment and Improvement Act of
2008. The final rule develops this pilot
program in conformance with the
statutory directive.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 13, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Roth, Office of Railroad
Policy and Development, FRA, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC
20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6109); or
Zeb Schorr, Attorney-Advisor, Office of
Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey
Ave. SE., Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC
20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6072).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
By notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) published on September 7,
2011 (76 FR 55335), FRA proposed an
alternate passenger rail service pilot
program in response to a statutory
mandate—specifically, § 214 of the
Passenger Rail Investment and
Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA),
Public Law No. 110–432, Division B
(Oct. 16, 2008). The comment period for
the NPRM closed on November 7, 2011.
FRA received written comments
submitted by Ratp Development
America, the Transportation Trades
Department of the AFL–CIO, the
American Short Line and Regional
Railroad Association, the Association of
Independent Passenger Rail Operators,
Herzog Transit Services, Inc., First
Transit, Veolia Transportation N.A., and
two individuals.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
General comments are addressed in
this section, and more specific
comments are addressed in the relevant
sections of the preamble below. Some
comments were generally supportive of
the NPRM, and other comments were
generally unsupportive of the NPRM.
A comment sought clarification
regarding whether an eligible rail carrier
under the pilot program could create a
separate company to manage and
operate the passenger operation, or
whether it could enter into a private
access rights agreement with an
alternative rail passenger operator. This
final rule develops a pilot program that
permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that
own infrastructure over which Amtrak
operates certain passenger rail service
routes to petition FRA to be considered
as a passenger rail service provider over
such a route in lieu of Amtrak. This
final rule does not prohibit an eligible
rail carrier from creating a separate
company to manage and/or operate the
passenger rail service, or from entering
into an agreement with a third party to
manage and/or operate the passenger
rail service. However, a pilot program
petition must be submitted by a rail
carrier or rail carriers that own the
infrastructure as described in § 269.7 of
this final rule. In addition, such
information regarding the management
and/or operation of the service would be
relevant to FRA’s evaluation of the bid,
and should be described in detail
pursuant to § 269.9 of this final rule.
Several comments stated that the pilot
program should allow a State to submit
a petition (with the concurrence of the
infrastructure owner), and/or that there
should be a statutory role for States in
the pilot program. Comments also stated
that State involvement is particularly
important to bidding on State-supported
routes (which are eligible under the
pilot program) as such routes are largely
funded by States. A comment further
stated that States should be able to
participate in the pilot program process
both out of a matter of fairness and to
ensure that existing contracts between
States and Amtrak would not be
unconstitutionally impaired. As an
initial matter, § 214 of PRIIA only
provides that a rail carrier or rail
carriers that own infrastructure over
which Amtrak operates certain
passenger rail service routes may submit
a petition. See 49 U.S.C. 24711(a)(1).
Section 214 does not establish a
statutory role for States in the pilot
program petition process. In compliance
with this statutory mandate, this final
rule provides that only an eligible rail
carrier may submit a petition. However,
a State may participate in the pilot
program process. Specifically, a
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77712-77716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32007]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and 188
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0363]
RIN 1625-AB71
Seagoing Barges
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is revising
regulations for the inspection and certification of seagoing barges to
align with the language of the applicable statutes. The statutory
language exempts certain seagoing barges from inspection. Through this
rule, we seek to make the language of the regulation consistent with
the language of the statute.
DATES: This rule is effective April 12, 2012, unless an adverse
comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, is either
submitted to our online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or
before February 13, 2012 or reaches the Docket Management Facility by
that date. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an
adverse comment, is received by February 13, 2012, we will withdraw
this direct final rule and publish a timely notice of withdrawal in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0363 using any one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
email or call LT Douglas Tindall, Coast Guard; telephone (202) 372-
1411, email Douglas.Tindall@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Regulatory Information
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Discussion of the Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0363), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov and
insert ``USCG-2011-0363'' in the ``Keyword'' box. Click ``Search'' then
click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit
your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know
that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0363'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
If you do not have access to the Internet, you may also view the docket
online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
[[Page 77713]]
D. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one to the docket using one of the methods specified under
ADDRESSES. In your request, explain why you believe a public meeting
would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
II. Abbreviations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
NVIC Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular
Pub. L. Public Law
U.S.C. United States Code
III. Regulatory Information
We are publishing this direct final rule under 33 CFR 1.05-55
because we do not expect an adverse comment. If no adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit an adverse comment is received by February
13, 2012, this rule will become effective as stated in the DATES
section. In that case, approximately 30 days before the effective date,
we will publish a document in the Federal Register stating that no
adverse comment was received and confirming that this rule will become
effective as scheduled. However, if we receive an adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, we will publish a
document in the Federal Register announcing the withdrawal of all or
part of this direct final rule. If an adverse comment applies only to
part of this rule (e.g., to an amendment, a paragraph, or a section)
and it is possible to remove that part without defeating the purpose of
this rule, we may adopt, as final, those parts of this rule on which no
adverse comment was received. We will withdraw the part of this rule
that was the subject of an adverse comment. If we decide to proceed
with a rulemaking following receipt of an adverse comment, we will
publish a separate notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a
new opportunity for comment.
A comment is considered adverse if the comment explains why this
rule or a part of this rule would be inappropriate, including a
challenge to its underlying premise or approach, or would be
ineffective or unacceptable without a change.
IV. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard has the delegated authority to carry out the
responsibilities related to vessel inspection enumerated in 46 U.S.C.
3301-3318. See also 46 U.S.C. 2104; DHS Delegation 0170.1(92b).
Pursuant to this authority, the Coast Guard has issued regulations
regarding inspection and certification of seagoing barges in 46 CFR
parts 90 and 91.
In 1983, sec. 2101(32), Public Law 98-89, 97 Stat. 500 (46 U.S.C.
2101) redefined ``seagoing barge'' as a non self-propelled vessel of at
least 100 gross tons making voyages beyond the Boundary Line. Coast
Guard regulations at 46 CFR 91.01-10(c) do not reflect the language
change and instead refer to seagoing barges as vessels ``on the high
seas or ocean.'' The purpose of this rule is to change the language in
46 CFR 91.01-10 from ``on the high seas or ocean'' to ``beyond the
Boundary Line'' to reflect the language of Public Law 98-89.
In 1993, Congress exempted from inspection seagoing barges that are
unmanned and not carrying hazardous material as cargo, or carrying a
flammable or combustible liquid, including oil, in bulk. See Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 1993, Public Law 103-206, 107 Stat. 2419 (46
U.S.C. 3302(m)). In 1993, the Coast Guard stopped requiring the
specified seagoing barges to be inspected to conform with Public Law
103-206. However, the Coast Guard did not amend its regulations to
reflect the exemption. The purpose of this rule is to change the
language concerning seagoing barges in 46 CFR 90.05-25, 46 CFR 91.01-
10, and the vessel inspection tables in 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90,
and 188 to reflect the exemption created by Public Law 103-206.
V. Discussion of the Rule
Coast Guard regulations contained in 46 CFR 91.01-10(c) provide for
modification of the period of validity of the certificate of inspection
for seagoing barges that: (1) Proceed on the high seas or ocean for the
sole purpose of changing place of employment; or (2) make rare or
infrequent voyages on the high seas or ocean and returning to the port
of departure. This language does not reflect the language of Public Law
98-89 that redefined ``seagoing barge'' as a non self-propelled vessel
of at least 100 gross tons making voyages beyond the Boundary Line. In
this rule, the Coast Guard changes the language of &46 CFR 91.01-
10(c)(1)(i) and (ii) to clarify that modification of the period of
validity of the certificate of inspection is permissible for seagoing
barges that make voyages beyond the ``Boundary Line'' vice the current
language of ``high seas or ocean.''
Coast Guard regulations contained in 46 CFR 90.05-25 dictates
inspection and certification requirements for seagoing barges, but
currently do not reflect the exemptions enacted by Public Law 103-206.
In this rule, the Coast Guard modifies the language of 46 CFR 90.05-25
exempting seagoing barges from inspection and certification that are
unmanned, and not carrying hazardous material as cargo, or a flammable
or combustible liquid, including oil, in bulk as enacted by Public Law
103-206.
To promote consistency and readability we are revising 46 CFR
91.01-10(c)(1)(i), 46 CFR 91.01-10(c)(1)(ii), and 46 CFR 91.01-10(c)(2)
to replace the language ``non self-propelled vessels of 100 gross tons
and over'' with the term ``seagoing barge'' as enacted by Public Law
98-89 and contained in 46 CFR 90.10-36.
The remaining revisions are intended to make the language of the
vessel inspection table published in the CFR consistent with the
language of the revised regulations. The vessel inspection table is a
visual representation of when vessels must be inspected, and is
organized by type of vessel, method of propulsion, cargo, mission, etc.
This is a single table that is published in the multiple sections of
the CFR that deal with inspection of vessels, namely 46 CFR parts 2,
24, 30, 70, 90, and 188. We are revising the vessel inspection table by
removing from row 4, column 4 the text ``All seagoing barges except
those covered by columns 2 and 3.'' and adding, in its place, the text
``All manned seagoing barges.''
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, 76 FR 3821 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review), and does not require an assessment
of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive
Order 12866. The Office of Management and
[[Page 77714]]
Budget has not reviewed it under these Executive Orders.
Sec. 2102 (32) of Public Law 98-89 redefined ``seagoing barge'' to
mean ``a non-self-propelled vessel of at least 100 gross tons making
voyages beyond the Boundary Line.''
Sec. 311 of Public Law 103-206 amended 46 U.S.C. 3302 to exempt
certain seagoing barges from inspection and certification when the
barges are unmanned and not carrying hazardous material as cargo, or a
flammable or combustible liquid, including oil, in bulk. This rule will
align 46 CFR 90.05-24, 46 CFR 91.01-10, and the vessel inspection table
in 46 CFR 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, and 188 with Public Law 98-89 and Public
Law 103-206.
Based on Public Law 98-89 and Public Law 103-206, seagoing barges
that do not need inspection are those that meet all of the following
characteristics:
1. Coastwise or oceans route as per sec. 2102(32), Public Law 98-
89;
2. 100 gross tons or greater as per sec. 2102 (32), Public Law 98-
89;
3. Unmanned as per sec. 311, Public Law 103-206; and
4. Not carrying hazardous material as cargo, or a flammable or
combustible liquid, including oil, in bulk as per sec. 311, Public Law
103-206.
Because the Coast Guard is aligning the text of the regulations
with the current inspections laws enacted in 1993, only barges that are
manned, or carrying hazardous material as cargo or a flammable or
combustible liquid, including oil, in bulk are inspected. If owners or
operators choose to voluntarily inspect barges that are exempt from
inspection, these owners or operators do so voluntarily and would
voluntarily incur the cost. We estimate that there are no additional
costs to implement this rule.
The benefit of this rule is in making the CFR consistent with the
current law. As this statutory change has been in effect for more than
18 years, we expect this rule will not provide additional cost savings
to industry.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
As previously discussed, the purpose of this rule is to align the
language concerning seagoing barges in 46 CFR 90.05-25, 46 CFR 91.01-
10, and the vessel inspection tables in 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90,
and 188 with the language of Public Law 98-89 and Public Law 103-206.
Public Law 98-89 redefined ``seagoing barge'' as a non-self-propelled
vessel of at least 100 gross tons making voyages beyond the Boundary
Line. Public Law 103-206 exempted certain seagoing barges from
inspection and certification that are unmanned, and not carrying
hazardous material as cargo, or carrying a flammable or combustible
liquid, including oil, in bulk.
This rule does not result in additional costs for small entities
because the Coast Guard is aligning the text of the regulations with
the current law. Since exempted barges have not been inspected for more
than 10 years, this rule will impose no additional impacts (costs or
cost savings) to small entities.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Comments submitted in response to this
finding will be evaluated under the criteria in the ``Regulatory
Information'' section of this preamble.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under sec. 213(a) of the Contract with America Act of 1996, Public
Law104-121, 110 Stat. 847, we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule will affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please consult LT Douglas Tindall at (202) 372-1411 or by email at
Douglas.Tindall@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if the rule has a substantial direct effect on State or
local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a
substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this
rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
[[Page 77715]]
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2,
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(a) of the Instruction. This rule involves
amendments to regulations which are editorial or procedural and merely
align the text of the regulations with current law and Coast Guard
practice. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 2
Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
46 CFR Part 24
Marine safety.
46 CFR Part 30
Cargo vessels, Foreign relations, Hazardous materials
transportation, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Seamen.
46 CFR Part 70
Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 90
Cargo vessels, Marine safety.
46 CFR Part 91
Cargo vessels, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 188
Marine safety, Oceanographic research vessels.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
46 CFR parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and 188 as follows:
PART 2--VESSEL INSPECTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 46 U.S.C. 2110, 3103,
3205, 3306, 3307, 3703; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; E.O. 12234, 45 FR
58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1. Subpart 2.45 also issued under the Act Dec.
27, 1950, Ch. 1155, secs. 1, 2, 64 Stat. 1120 (see 46 U.S.C. App.
Note prec. 1).
Sec. 2.01-7 [Amended]
0
2. In Table 2.01-7(a), row 4, column 4, of Sec. 2.01-7, remove the
text ``All seagoing barges except those covered by columns 2 and 3.''
and add, in its place, the text ``All manned seagoing barges.''.
PART 24--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 24 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306, 4104, 4302; Pub. L. 103-206;
107 Stat. 2439; E.O. 12234; 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 24.01-5 [Amended]
0
4. In Table 24.01-5(a), row 4, column 4, of Sec. 24.01-5, remove the
text ``All seagoing barges except those covered by columns 2 and 3.''
and add, in its place, the text ``All manned seagoing barges.''.
PART 30--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
5. The authority citation for part 30 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107
Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; Section 30.01-2 also issued under the
authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507; Section 30.01-05 also issued under the
authority of Sec. 4109, Pub. L. 101-380, 104 Stat. 515.
Sec. 30.01-5 [Amended]
0
6. In Table 30.05-1(d), row 4, column 4, of Sec. 30.01-5, remove the
text ``All seagoing barges except those covered by columns 2 and 3.''
and add, in its place, the text ``All manned seagoing barges.''.
PART 70--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
7. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107 Stat.
2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1; Section 70.01-15 also issued under the authority of 44
U.S.C. 3507.
Sec. 70.05-1 [Amended]
0
8. In Table 70.05-1(a), row 4, column 4, of Sec. 70.05-1, remove the
text ``All seagoing barges except those covered by columns 2 and 3.''
and add, in its place, the text ``All manned seagoing barges.''.
PART 90--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
9. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107 Stat.
2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
Sec. 90.05-1 [Amended]
0
10. In Table 90.05-1(a), row 4, column 4, of Sec. 90.05-1, remove the
text ``All seagoing barges except those covered by columns 2 and 3.''
and add, in its place, the text ``All manned seagoing barges.''.
0
11. Revise Sec. 90.05-25(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.05-25 Seagoing barge.
(a) All non-self-propelled vessels of 100 gross tons or more are
subject to inspection when proceeding beyond the Boundary Line if
they--
[[Page 77716]]
(1) Carry a hazardous material as cargo; or
(2) Carry a flammable or combustible liquid, including oil, in
bulk; or
(3) Are manned.
* * * * *
PART 91--INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION
0
12. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 3205, 3306, 3307; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701; Executive Order 12234; 45 FR 58801; 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Executive Order 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991
Comp., p. 351; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
13. Amend Sec. 91.01-10 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii); and
0
b. In paragraph (c)(2), remove the words ``seagoing barges of 100 gross
tons and over,'' and add, in their place, the words ``inspected
seagoing barges''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 91.01-10 Period of validity for a Certificate of Inspection
* * * * *
(c)(1) * * *
(i) Inspected seagoing barges proceeding beyond the Boundary Line
for the sole purpose of changing place of employment.
(ii) Inspected seagoing barges making rare or infrequent voyages
beyond the Boundary Line and returning to the port of departure.
* * * * *
PART 188--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
14. The authority citation for part 188 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306; Pub. L 103-206, 107 Stat. 2439;
49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p.
277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 188.05-1 [Amended]
0
15. In Table 188.05-1(a), row 4, column 4, of Sec. 188.05-1, remove
the text ``All seagoing barges except those covered by columns 2 and
3.'' and add, in its place, the text ``All manned seagoing barges.''.
Dated: December 6, 2011.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2011-32007 Filed 12-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P