Endangered and Threatened Species; Initiation of Status Review for Ribbon Seal, 77467-77469 [2011-31959]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
review report was completed by the
BRT (Kelly et al., 2010), on December
10, 2010, we made a 12-month finding
and proposed to list the Arctic (Phoca
hispida hispida), Baltic (Phoca hispida
botnica), Okhotsk (Phoca hispida
ochotensis), and Ladoga (Phoca hispida
ladogensis) subspecies of ringed seals as
threatened (75 FR 77476). We published
our 12-month finding for bearded seals
as a separate notification concurrently
with this finding (75 FR 77496;
December 10, 2010).
The proposed rule announced a 60day comment period to close on
February 8, 2011. On February 8, 2011,
we extended the comment period 45
days to March 25, 2011 (76 FR 6754).
Three public hearings were held in
Alaska in Anchorage, Barrow, and
Nome (76 FR 9733, February 22, 2011;
76 FR 14882, March 18, 2011).
In accordance with our July 1, 1994,
Interagency Cooperative Policy on Peer
Review (59 FR 34270), we requested the
expert opinion of four independent
scientists with expertise in seal biology
and/or Arctic sea ice and climate change
regarding the pertinent scientific data
and assumptions concerning the
biological and ecological information
used in the proposed rule. The purpose
of the review was to ensure that the best
biological and commercial information
was used in the decision-making
process, including input of appropriate
experts and specialists. We received
comments from three of these reviewers.
Two of the reviewers questioned the
magnitude and immediacy of the threats
posed to Arctic ringed seals by the
projected changes in sea ice habitat, in
particular on-ice snow cover. Public
comments raised similar concerns,
including from the State of Alaska;
certain Tribal governments, Alaska
Native organizations, and organizations
representing the Inuit in Canada;
Canada’s Department of Fisheries and
Oceans; and Greenland’s Department of
Fisheries, Hunting, and Agriculture. We
have considered these comments, and
we find that for Arctic ringed seals
substantial disagreement exists
concerning the sufficiency or accuracy
of the analysis of model projections of
future sea ice habitat, in particular onice snow cover, and related impacts.
This disagreement extends to the
magnitude and immediacy of the threats
posed to this population by the
projected habitat changes.
Extension of Final Listing
Determination
The ESA, section 4(b)(6), requires that
we take one of three actions within 1
year of a proposed listing: (1) Finalize
the proposed listing; (2) withdraw the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Dec 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
proposed listing; or (3) extend the final
determination by not more than 6
months, if there is substantial
disagreement regarding the sufficiency
or accuracy of the available data
relevant to the determination, for the
purposes of soliciting additional data.
In consideration of the disagreement
related to the model projections and
analysis of future sea ice habitat, in
particular snow cover, for Arctic ringed
seals, we are extending the timeline for
the final determination by an additional
6 months (until June 10, 2012) to resolve
the disagreement. We believe that the
solicitation of additional data through
special independent peer review of this
aspect of the status review report will
better inform our final determination on
the proposed listing rule and will
address the disagreement. We are
therefore conducting this additional
review in accordance with our Policy on
Peer Review, and we will provide an
opportunity for the public to comment
on the peer review report. The
additional 6 months will allow time for
us to evaluate and assess the special
independent peer review comments and
make the peer review report available
for comment. We do not anticipate that
this additional time will appreciably
impact any of the four subspecies of the
ringed seal we proposed to list as
threatened.
The reopening of the public comment
period will be announced in the Federal
Register when the availability of the
peer review report compiling the special
independent review comments is
known. At that time, instructions for
obtaining a copy of the peer review
report will also be announced.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: December 6, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–31969 Filed 12–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
RIN 0648–XA768
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Initiation of Status Review for Ribbon
Seal
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77467
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Initiation of status review and
solicitation of information.
We, NMFS, under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (ESA), announce
the initiation of a status review for the
ribbon seal (Histriophoca fasciata). We
conduct status reviews to determine
whether the entity should be listed as
threatened or endangered under the
ESA. To ensure that the status review is
comprehensive, we are soliciting
scientific and commercial information
regarding this species (see below).
DATES: Information and comments on
the subject action must be received by
February 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Kaja
Brix, Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division, Alaska
Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian.
You may submit comments, identified
by FDMS Docket Number NOAA–
NMFS–2011–0248, by any one of the
following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon,
then enter NOAA–NMFS–2011–0248 in
the keyword search. Locate the
document you wish to comment on
from the resulting list and click on the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right
of that line.
Mail: Submit written comments to
P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586–7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building:
709 West 9th Street, Room 420A,
Juneau, AK.
Comments must be submitted by one
of the above methods to ensure that the
comments are received, documented,
and considered by NMFS. Comments
sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after
the end of the comment period, may not
be considered.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
posted for public viewing on https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields if you wish to remain
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
77468
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tamara Olson, NMFS Alaska Region,
(907) 271–5006; Kaja Brix, NMFS
Alaska Region, (907) 586–7235; or Marta
Nammack, Office of Protected
Resources, Silver Spring, MD (301) 713–
1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 20, 2007, we received a
petition from the Center for Biological
Diversity (CBD) to list the ribbon seal as
a threatened or endangered species
under the ESA, primarily due to
concern about threats to this species’
habitat from climate warming and loss
of sea ice. The Petitioner also requested
that critical habitat be designated for
ribbon seals concurrently with listing
under the ESA. On March 28, 2008, we
published a 90-day finding (73 FR
16617) in which we determined that the
petition presented substantial
information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted and
initiated a status review of the ribbon
seal.
On December 30, 2008, we published
our 12-month finding that listing of the
ribbon seal was not warranted (73 FR
79822). In this finding we concluded
that although ribbon seal population
abundance is likely to decline gradually
for the foreseeable future, primarily
from slight but chronic impacts on
reproduction and survival caused by
reduced frequency of years with sea ice
of suitable extent, quality, and duration
of persistence, it is not in danger of
extinction or likely to become an
endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
On September 3, 2009, CBD and
Greenpeace, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Center’’)
filed a complaint in U.S. District Court
challenging our 12-month finding. On
December 21, 2010, after considering
cross-motions for summary judgment,
the Court denied the Center’s motion for
summary judgment and granted NMFS’
cross-motion. The Center filed a notice
of appeal of this judgment to the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals on January 18,
2011.
Information has become available
since publication of the December 30,
2008, 12-month finding that may have
implications for the status of the ribbon
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Dec 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
seal relative to the listing provisions of
the ESA, including new data on ribbon
seal movements and diving, as well as
a modified threat-specific approach to
analyzing the foreseeable future which
we used in the spotted (Phoca largha),
ringed (Phoca hispida), and bearded
seal (Erignathus barbatus) status
reviews completed subsequent to the
ribbon seal status review (75 FR 65239,
October 22, 2010; 75 FR 77476 and 75
FR 77496, December 10, 2010). In
consideration of this information, we
entered a settlement agreement with the
Center on August 30, 2011, under which
we agreed to initiate a new status review
and issue a 12-month finding on
whether listing the ribbon seal as
threatened or endangered is warranted
and submit the determination to the
Office of the Federal Register by
December 10, 2012. This document
initiates a new status review for the
ribbon seal.
You may obtain copies of previous
Federal actions relating to the ribbon
seal from https://www.regulations.gov or
from the Alaska Region Web site at
https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
ESA Statutory Provisions and Policy
Considerations
There are two key tasks associated
with an ESA status review. The first is
to delineate the taxonomic group under
consideration and the second is to
conduct an extinction risk assessment to
determine whether the petitioned
species is threatened or endangered.
Under the ESA, a listing
determination can address a species,
subspecies, or a distinct population
segment (DPS) of a vertebrate species
(16 U.S.C. 1532 (16)). The term ‘‘distinct
population segment’’ (DPS) is not
commonly used in scientific discourse,
so the USFWS and NMFS developed the
‘‘Policy Regarding the Recognition of
Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments
Under the Endangered Species Act’’ to
provide a consistent interpretation of
this term for the purposes of listing,
delisting, and reclassifying vertebrates
under the ESA (61 FR 4722; February 7,
1996). We will use this policy to guide
our determination of whether DPSs exist
in ribbon seals.
The ESA defines an endangered
species as ‘‘any species which is in
danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.’’ A
threatened species is defined as a
species that is ‘‘likely to become an
endangered species within the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.’’ Under
section 4(a)(1) of the ESA, a species may
be determined to be threatened or
endangered as a result of any one of the
following factors: (1) Present or
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of habitat or range; (2)
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (3) disease or predation; (4)
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (5) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence. Listing determinations are
based solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available, after
conducting a review of the status of the
species and taking into account efforts
made by any state or foreign nation to
protect such species.
Information Solicited
To ensure that the status review is
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we are opening a 60-day
public comment period to solicit
information from the public,
government agencies, Alaska Natives,
the scientific community, industry, and
other interested parties on the status of
the ribbon seal throughout its range. We
are seeking:
(1) Information on taxonomy,
abundance, reproductive success, age
structure, distribution, habitat selection,
food habits, population density and
trends, habitat trends, and effects of
management on ribbon seals;
(2) Information on the effects of
climate change and sea ice change on
the distribution and abundance of
ribbon seals and their principal prey
over the short- and long-term;
(3) Information on the effects of other
potential threat factors, including oil
and gas exploration and development,
contaminants, hunting, and poaching,
on the distribution and abundance of
ribbon seals and their principal prey
over the short- and long-term;
(4) Information on management
programs for ribbon seal conservation,
including mitigation measures related to
oil and gas exploration and
development, hunting conservation
programs, anti-poaching programs, and
any other private, tribal, or
governmental conservation programs
which benefit ribbon seals; and
(5) Information relevant to population
structure of ribbon seals.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We request that all data and
information be accompanied by
supporting documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, or
reprints of pertinent publications.
Please submit any comments to the
ADDRESSES listed above. We will base
our finding on a review of the best
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Dec 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
scientific and commercial information
available, including all information
received during the public comment
period.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
77469
Dated: December 6, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–31959 Filed 12–12–11; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77467-77469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31959]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
RIN 0648-XA768
Endangered and Threatened Species; Initiation of Status Review
for Ribbon Seal
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Initiation of status review and solicitation of information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (ESA), announce the initiation of a status review for
the ribbon seal (Histriophoca fasciata). We conduct status reviews to
determine whether the entity should be listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA. To ensure that the status review is
comprehensive, we are soliciting scientific and commercial information
regarding this species (see below).
DATES: Information and comments on the subject action must be received
by February 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by FDMS Docket
Number NOAA-NMFS-2011-0248, by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal, first click the ``submit a
comment'' icon, then enter NOAA-NMFS-2011-0248 in the keyword search.
Locate the document you wish to comment on from the resulting list and
click on the ``Submit a Comment'' icon on the right of that line.
Mail: Submit written comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
Comments must be submitted by one of the above methods to ensure
that the comments are received, documented, and considered by NMFS.
Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual,
or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing on https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required
fields if you wish to remain
[[Page 77468]]
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara Olson, NMFS Alaska Region,
(907) 271-5006; Kaja Brix, NMFS Alaska Region, (907) 586-7235; or Marta
Nammack, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD (301) 713-
1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 20, 2007, we received a petition from the Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD) to list the ribbon seal as a threatened or
endangered species under the ESA, primarily due to concern about
threats to this species' habitat from climate warming and loss of sea
ice. The Petitioner also requested that critical habitat be designated
for ribbon seals concurrently with listing under the ESA. On March 28,
2008, we published a 90-day finding (73 FR 16617) in which we
determined that the petition presented substantial information
indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted and initiated a
status review of the ribbon seal.
On December 30, 2008, we published our 12-month finding that
listing of the ribbon seal was not warranted (73 FR 79822). In this
finding we concluded that although ribbon seal population abundance is
likely to decline gradually for the foreseeable future, primarily from
slight but chronic impacts on reproduction and survival caused by
reduced frequency of years with sea ice of suitable extent, quality,
and duration of persistence, it is not in danger of extinction or
likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
On September 3, 2009, CBD and Greenpeace, Inc. (collectively,
``Center'') filed a complaint in U.S. District Court challenging our
12-month finding. On December 21, 2010, after considering cross-motions
for summary judgment, the Court denied the Center's motion for summary
judgment and granted NMFS' cross-motion. The Center filed a notice of
appeal of this judgment to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on
January 18, 2011.
Information has become available since publication of the December
30, 2008, 12-month finding that may have implications for the status of
the ribbon seal relative to the listing provisions of the ESA,
including new data on ribbon seal movements and diving, as well as a
modified threat-specific approach to analyzing the foreseeable future
which we used in the spotted (Phoca largha), ringed (Phoca hispida),
and bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus) status reviews completed
subsequent to the ribbon seal status review (75 FR 65239, October 22,
2010; 75 FR 77476 and 75 FR 77496, December 10, 2010). In consideration
of this information, we entered a settlement agreement with the Center
on August 30, 2011, under which we agreed to initiate a new status
review and issue a 12-month finding on whether listing the ribbon seal
as threatened or endangered is warranted and submit the determination
to the Office of the Federal Register by December 10, 2012. This
document initiates a new status review for the ribbon seal.
You may obtain copies of previous Federal actions relating to the
ribbon seal from https://www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska Region
Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
ESA Statutory Provisions and Policy Considerations
There are two key tasks associated with an ESA status review. The
first is to delineate the taxonomic group under consideration and the
second is to conduct an extinction risk assessment to determine whether
the petitioned species is threatened or endangered.
Under the ESA, a listing determination can address a species,
subspecies, or a distinct population segment (DPS) of a vertebrate
species (16 U.S.C. 1532 (16)). The term ``distinct population segment''
(DPS) is not commonly used in scientific discourse, so the USFWS and
NMFS developed the ``Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct
Vertebrate Population Segments Under the Endangered Species Act'' to
provide a consistent interpretation of this term for the purposes of
listing, delisting, and reclassifying vertebrates under the ESA (61 FR
4722; February 7, 1996). We will use this policy to guide our
determination of whether DPSs exist in ribbon seals.
The ESA defines an endangered species as ``any species which is in
danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range.'' A threatened species is defined as a species that is ``likely
to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range.'' Under section
4(a)(1) of the ESA, a species may be determined to be threatened or
endangered as a result of any one of the following factors: (1) Present
or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of habitat or
range; (2) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (3) disease or predation; (4) inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; or (5) other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence. Listing determinations are based
solely on the best scientific and commercial data available, after
conducting a review of the status of the species and taking into
account efforts made by any state or foreign nation to protect such
species.
Information Solicited
To ensure that the status review is complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial information, we are opening a 60-
day public comment period to solicit information from the public,
government agencies, Alaska Natives, the scientific community,
industry, and other interested parties on the status of the ribbon seal
throughout its range. We are seeking:
(1) Information on taxonomy, abundance, reproductive success, age
structure, distribution, habitat selection, food habits, population
density and trends, habitat trends, and effects of management on ribbon
seals;
(2) Information on the effects of climate change and sea ice change
on the distribution and abundance of ribbon seals and their principal
prey over the short- and long-term;
(3) Information on the effects of other potential threat factors,
including oil and gas exploration and development, contaminants,
hunting, and poaching, on the distribution and abundance of ribbon
seals and their principal prey over the short- and long-term;
(4) Information on management programs for ribbon seal
conservation, including mitigation measures related to oil and gas
exploration and development, hunting conservation programs, anti-
poaching programs, and any other private, tribal, or governmental
conservation programs which benefit ribbon seals; and
(5) Information relevant to population structure of ribbon seals.
[[Page 77469]]
We request that all data and information be accompanied by
supporting documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, or
reprints of pertinent publications. Please submit any comments to the
ADDRESSES listed above. We will base our finding on a review of the
best scientific and commercial information available, including all
information received during the public comment period.
Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: December 6, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-31959 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P