Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In the Matter of Progress Energy Florida, Inc.; (Levy County Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), 77561-77563 [2011-31903]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2011 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
hour for NRC licensees + 10.7 hours for
Agreement State licensees + 1.17 hours
recordkeeping).
10. Abstract: Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 31.11
establishes a general license authorizing
any physician, clinical laboratory,
veterinarian in the practice of veterinary
medicine, or hospital to possess certain
small quantities of byproduct material
for in vitro clinical or laboratory tests
not involving the internal or external
administration of the byproduct
material or the radiation there from to
human beings or animals. Possession of
byproduct material under 10 CFR 31.11
is not authorized until the physician,
clinical laboratory, veterinarian in the
practice of veterinary medicine, or
hospital has filed NRC Form 483 and
received from the Commission a
validated copy of NRC Form 483 with
a registration number.
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee, publicly available
documents, including the final
supporting statement, at the NRC’s
Public Document Room, Room O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20874. OMB
clearance requests are available at the
NRC Web site: https://www.nrc.gov/
public-involve/doc-comment/omb/
index.html. The document will be
available on the NRC home page site for
60 days after the signature date of this
notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by January 12, 2012. Comments
received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
given to comments received after this
date.
Chad Whiteman, Desk Officer, Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
(3150–0038), NEOB–10202, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503.
Comments can also be emailed to
CWhiteman@omb.eop.gov or submitted
by telephone at (202) 395–4718.
The NRC Clearance Officer is
Tremaine Donnell, (301) 415–6258.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of December 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–31850 Filed 12–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Dec 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–029–COL, 52–030–COL;
ASLBP No. 09–879–04–COL–BD01]
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In
the Matter of Progress Energy Florida,
Inc.; (Levy County Nuclear Power
Plant, Units 1 and 2)
December 7, 2011.
Before Administrative Judges: Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Dr. Anthony J. Baratta, Dr.
William M. Murphy.
Notice
(Opportunity To Make Oral or Written
Limited Appearance Statements)
This Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board hereby gives notice that it will
accept oral or written limited
appearance statements from members of
the public regarding the application of
Progress Energy Florida, Inc. (PEF) to
the United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) for a license to
construct and operate two nuclear
power plants in Levy County, Florida.
Two sessions to hear oral limited
appearance statements will be held on
January 12, 2012, in Crystal River,
Florida.
I. Background and Scope of Proceeding
On December 8, 2008, the NRC
published a notice in the Federal
Register that any interested person
could file a challenge to PEF’s
application to construct and operate two
proposed nuclear power plants in Levy
County, Florida and could request an
adjudicatory hearing thereon. 73 FR
74,532 (Dec. 8, 2008) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML083430114). On
February 6, 2009, the Nuclear
Information and Resource Service, the
Ecology Party of Florida, and the Green
Party of Florida (Intervenors) filed such
a challenge and request.1 On February
23, 2009, this Board was established to
handle the matter and to preside over
any contested adjudicatory proceeding
relating to the PEF application.2 On July
8, 2009, this Board granted the
Intervenors’ request, ruling that they
had shown standing and had raised at
least one admissible contention. See
LBP–09–10, 70 NRC 51, 147 (2009)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML091890822).
1 Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing by
the Green Party of Florida, the Ecology Party of
Florida and Nuclear Information and Resource
Service (Feb. 6, 2009) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML090371107).
2 Progress Energy Florida, Inc.; Establishment of
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 74 FR 9113
(Mar. 2, 2009) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML090540936).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77561
The scope of this contested
adjudicatory proceeding, and thus the
appropriate scope of any limited
appearance statements, is defined by the
contentions that have been raised by the
Intervenors and that have been
admitted, i.e., have been ruled to satisfy
the requirements set forth in the
relevant NRC regulation, 10 CFR
2.309(f)(1).3 The Intervenors have
proffered several contentions, but at this
point only one such admitted
contention remains in litigation—
Contention 4A.4 Contention 4A,
therefore, defines the appropriate scope
of any limited appearance statements.5
Contention 4A reads as follows:
Contention 4A: The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
fails to comply with 10 CFR part 51 and
the National Environmental Policy Act
because it fails to specifically and
adequately address, and inappropriately
characterizes as SMALL, certain direct,
indirect, and cumulative impacts, onsite
and offsite, of constructing and
operating the proposed LNP facility:
A. Impacts to wetlands, floodplains,
special aquatic sites, and other waters,
associated with dewatering, specifically:
1. Impacts resulting from active and
passive dewatering;
2. Impacts resulting from the
connection of the site to the underlying
Floridan aquifer system;
3. Impacts on Outstanding Florida
Waters such as the Withlacoochee and
Waccasassa Rivers;
4. Impacts on water quality and the
aquatic environment due to alterations
and increases in nutrient concentrations
caused by the removal of water; and
5. Impacts on water quality and the
aquatic environment due to increased
nutrients resulting from destructive
wildfires resulting from dewatering.
B. Impacts to wetlands, floodplains,
special aquatic sites, and other waters,
associated with salt drift and salt
deposition resulting from cooling towers
(that use salt water) being situated in an
inland, freshwater wetland area of the
LNP site.
3 In addition to the contested adjudicatory
proceeding being conducted by this Board, there
will be an uncontested adjudicatory proceeding
concerning PEF’s application to construct and
operate the two proposed nuclear power plants in
Levy County. See 42 U.S.C. 2239(a)(i)(A). The
content of the uncontested proceeding is not within
the scope of this adjudication. See ‘‘Conduct of
Mandatory Hearings on Applications for Combined
Licenses,’’ Internal Commission Procedures at IV–
12—IV–21 (ADAMS Accession No. ML11269A125).
4 Licensing Board Memorandum and Order
(Admitting Contention 4A) (February 2, 2011) at 20
(unpublished) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML110330394).
5 If additional contentions are subsequently
admitted, or if Contention 4A is subsequently
settled, dismissed, or revised, then the scope of this
proceeding will change accordingly.
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
77562
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2011 / Notices
C. As a result of the omissions and
inadequacies described above, the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement also
failed to adequately identify, and
inappropriately characterizes as
SMALL, the proposed project’s zone of:
1. Environmental impacts;
2. Impact on Federally listed species;
3. Irreversible and irretrievable
environmental impacts; and
4. Appropriate mitigation measures.
As specified below, members of the
public are invited to submit oral or
written statements, referred to as
‘‘limited appearance statements’’ related
to Contention 4A.
II. Notice of Oral Limited Appearance
Statement Sessions
A. Date, Time, and Location of Oral
Limited Appearance Statement Sessions
The oral limited appearance statement
sessions will be held on the following
dates, at the specified location and
times:
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012.
Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. to
10 p.m.
Location: Plantation Inn Resort, 9301
West Fort Island Trail, Crystal River,
Florida.
B. Participation Guidelines for Oral
Limited Appearance Statements
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The purpose of the limited
appearance statements is to allow
members of the public who are not
parties to the adjudication to provide
the Board with statements setting forth
their positions or concerns on matters
relating to the admitted contentions.6
Such statements may be presented
orally during the limited appearance
sessions specified above or may be
submitted in writing. Speakers should
be aware, however, that the jurisdiction
of this Board and the scope of this
proceeding are limited to the PEF
application, and, more particularly, to
Contention 4A. Limited appearance
statements enable members of the
public to alert the Board to areas
relating to the PEF application and the
admitted contention where evidence
may need to be adduced, and to assist
the Board in its consideration of these
issues. Oral limited appearance
statements will be transcribed but are
6 The parties to the adjudication (acting via their
officers, directors, lawyers, pro-se representatives,
experts, and other witnesses) have the opportunity
to file formal motions and other pleadings, and to
submit testimony and other evidence in the
adjudication. Thus, the parties are not entitled to
make limited appearance statements. 10 CFR
2.315(a). In contrast, limited appearance statements
are the opportunity for the public to provide input.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Dec 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
not under oath or affirmation and do not
constitute formal testimony or evidence.
Oral limited appearance statements
will be entertained during the hours
specified above, or such lesser time as
may be sufficient to accommodate the
speakers who are present. If all
scheduled and unscheduled speakers
present at a session have made a
presentation, the Board reserves the
right to terminate the session before the
ending times listed above.
In order to allow all interested
persons an opportunity to address the
Board, the time allotted for each oral
limited appearance statement will be no
more than five minutes, and may be
further limited depending on the
number of written requests to make an
oral statement that are submitted in
accordance with section C below and/or
the number of persons present at the
designated times. At the outset of each
statement, the speaker should identify
himself or herself.
Members of the public who plan to
attend the limited appearance sessions
are advised that security measures may
be employed at the entrance to the
facility, including searches of handcarried items such as briefcases or
backpacks. Signs no larger than 18″ by
18″ will be permitted during the limited
appearance sessions, but may not be
attached to sticks, held up, or moved
about in the room. Cf. Policy Statement
on Enhancing Public Participation in
NRC Meetings, 67 FR 36,920, 36,923
(May 28, 2002).
In addition, using the same method of
service, a copy of the written request to
make an oral statement should be sent
to the Chairman of this Licensing Board
as follows:
Mail: Alex S. Karlin, Chairman, c/o:
Matthew E. Flyntz, Law Clerk, Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel, Mail
Stop T–3 E2C, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
Fax: (301) 415–5599 (verification
(301) 415–7405).
Email: Matthew.Flyntz@nrc.gov and
Sara.Culler@nrc.gov.
C. Submitting a Request To Make an
Oral Limited Appearance Statement
Documents relating to this proceeding
are available for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR) or electronically from the
publicly available records component of
NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible by clicking ‘‘Begin
Web-based ADAMS Search’’ on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR reference staff by
telephone at (800) 397–4209, (301) 415–
4737, or by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
Persons wishing to make an oral
statement who have submitted a timely
written request to do so will be given
priority over those who have not filed
such a request. To be considered timely,
a written request to make an oral
statement must be mailed, faxed, or sent
by email so as to be received by the
Board by 5 p.m. EST on Thursday,
January 5, 2011. The request should
specify the session (afternoon or
evening) during which the requester
wishes to make an oral statement. Based
on its review of the requests received by
the deadline, the Board reserves the
right to cancel or shorten either of the
sessions due to a lack of public interest.
Written requests to make an oral
statement should be submitted to:
Mail: Office of the Secretary,
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Fax: (301) 415–1101 (verification
(301) 415–1966).
Email: hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
D. Written Limited Appearance
Statements
A written limited appearance
statement may be submitted to the
Board in addition to, or in lieu of, an
oral limited appearance statement. The
Board encourages early submissions,
however, so that Board members will be
able to consider them while addressing
the issues in this proceeding. Such
statements should be sent to the Office
of the Secretary using the methods
prescribed above, with a copy to the
Board Chairman. A person who has
already filed a written limited
appearance statement in this matter is
not required to resubmit it, but should
notify the Board, as specified above, if
he or she wishes to make an oral
statement during the January sessions.
III. Availability of Documentary
Information Regarding the Proceeding
IV. Scheduling Information Updates
Any updated/revised scheduling
information regarding the limited
appearance sessions can be found on the
NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
public-involve/public-meetings/
index.cfm or by calling (800) 368–5642,
extension 5036, or (301) 415–5036.
December 7, 2011.
It is so ordered.
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2011 / Notices
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board.
Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Administrative Judge, Rockville,
Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2011–31903 Filed 12–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–335; NRC–2011–0194]
Florida Power & Light Company; St.
Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1; Exemption
1.0 Background
The Florida Power & Light Company
(FPL, the licensee) is the holder of
Renewed Facility Operating License No.
DPR–67, which authorizes operation of
St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 (St. Lucie,
Unit 1). The license provides, among
other things, that the facility is subject
to all rules, regulations, and orders of
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC, or the Commission) now or
hereafter in effect. The facility consists
of two pressurized-water reactors
located in Jensen Beach, Florida.
However, this exemption is applicable
only to St. Lucie, Unit 1.
By letter dated December 15, 2010,
FPL submitted a License Amendment
Request (LAR) to increase the licensed
core power level for St. Lucie, Unit 1,
from 2700 megawatts thermal (MWt) to
3020 MWt. As part of the LAR, the
licensee also proposed a revision of the
pressure-temperature (P–T) operating
limits for St. Lucie, Unit 1.
The above LAR referenced a topical
report that stated that the proposed
methodology for the P–T curves did not
meet some of the requirements of Title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) part 50, Appendix G, thus
requiring an exemption pursuant to 10
CFR 50.12. By letter dated March 3,
2011, the licensee responded to a
request for additional information to the
above LAR and also submitted a request
for the subject exemption.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2.0 Request/Action
Part 50 of 10 CFR, Appendix G,
‘‘Fracture Toughness Requirements,’’
which is invoked by 10 CFR 50.60,
requires that P–T limits be established
for the reactor coolant pressure
boundary during normal operating and
hydrostatic or leak rate testing
conditions. Specifically, 10 CFR Part 50,
Appendix G, Section IV.A.2, states that
‘‘[t]he appropriate requirements on both
the pressure-temperature limits and the
minimum permissible temperature must
be met for all conditions,’’ and ‘‘[t]he
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Dec 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
pressure-temperature limits identified
as ‘ASME [American Society for
Mechanical Engineers] Appendix G
limits’ in Table 3 require that the limits
must be at least as conservative as limits
obtained by following the methods of
analysis and the margins of safety of
Appendix G of Section XI of the ASME
Code [Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code].’’ The regulations in 10 CFR part
50, Appendix G also specify the use of
the applicable editions and addenda of
the ASME Code, Section XI, which are
incorporated by reference in 10 CFR
50.55a. In the 2009 Edition of 10 CFR,
the 1977 Edition through the 2004
Edition of the ASME Code, Section XI
are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR
50.55a. Finally, 10 CFR 50.60(b) states
that, ‘‘[p]roposed alternatives to the
described requirements in Append[ix] G
of this part or portions thereof may be
used when an exemption is granted by
the Commission under [10 CFR] 50.12.’’
In conjunction with the LAR for an
extended power uprate (EPU), the
licensee proposed to revise the P–T
limits but did not propose to relocate
the P–T limits from the Technical
Specifications to a PressureTemperature Limits Report (PTLR).
However, in Section 2.1.2 of the
Licensing Report for the St. Lucie, Unit
1, EPU (Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML103560429), the
licensee referenced the basis document
for the revised P–T limits. The basis
document, included as Appendix G to
the Licensing Report, is Westinghouse
Commercial Atomic Power report
WCAP–17197–NP Revision 0, ‘‘St. Lucie
Unit 1 RCS [reactor coolant system]
Pressure and Temperature Limits and
Low-Temperature Overpressure
Protection Report [LTOP] for 54
Effective Full-Power Years’’ (ADAMS
Accession No. ML103560511), which
references Combustion Engineering (CE)
Owners Group Topical Report CE
NPSD–683–A, Revision 6,
‘‘Development of a RCS Pressure and
Temperature Limits Report for the
Removal of P–T Limits and LTOP
Requirements from the Technical
Specifications’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML011350387), as the methodology for
determining the P–T limits.
By letter dated March 3, 2011
(ADAMS Accession No. ML110660300),
the licensee submitted a request for
exemption from 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix G, regarding the P–T limits
calculation. The licensee requested an
exemption from the requirements of 10
CFR 50, Appendix G, to use the
methodology of CE NPSD–683–A,
Revision 6 as the basis for the
developing the P–T limits. Specifically,
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77563
the licensee requested an exemption
from the requirements of 10 CFR 50,
Appendix G, Section IV.A.2, because
the P–T limits developed for St. Lucie,
Unit 1, use a finite element method to
determine the KIm factors.
The NRC staff evaluated the specific
PTLR methodology in CE NPSD–683,
Revision 6. This evaluation was
documented in the NRC safety
evaluation (SE) of March 16, 2001
(ADAMS Accession No. ML010780017),
which specified additional licensee
actions that are necessary to support a
licensee’s adoption of CE NPSD–683,
Revision 6. The final approved version
of this report was reissued as CE NPSD–
683–A, Revision 6, which included the
NRC SE and the required additional
action items as an attachment to the
report. One of the additional specified
actions (#21) stated, ‘‘(applicable only if
the CE NSSS [nuclear steam supply
system] methods for calculating KIm and
KIt factors, as stated in Section 5.4 of CE
NPSD–683, Revision 6, are being used
as the basis for generating the P–T limits
for their facilities) apply for an
exemption against requirements of
Section IV.A.2.of Appendix G to part 50
to apply the CE NSSS methods to their
P–T curves.’’ The action item further
stated that, ‘‘This is consistent with the
‘note’ on page 5–15 of CE NPSD–683,
Revision 6. Exemption requests to apply
the CE NSSS to the generation of P–T
limit curves should be submitted
pursuant to the provision of 10 CFR
50.60(b) and will be evaluated on a caseby-case basis against the exemption
request acceptance criteria of 10 CFR
50.12.’’
An exemption to use the methodology
of CE NPSD–683–A to calculate the KIt
factors is no longer necessary because
editions and addenda of the ASME
Code, Section XI, that have been
incorporated by reference into 10 CFR
50.55a subsequent to the issuance of the
final SE of CE NPSD–683–A, allow
methods for determining the KIt factors
that are equivalent to the methods
described in CE NPSD–683–A.
If a licensee proposes to use the
methodology in CE NPSD–683–A,
Revision 6, for the calculation of KIm, an
exemption is required, since the
methodology for the calculation of KIm
values in CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6,
cannot be shown to be equally or more
conservative than the methodology for
the determination of KIm provided in
editions and addenda of the ASME
Code, Section XI, Appendix G, through
the 2004 Edition. Therefore, the licensee
submitted an exemption request,
consistent with the requirements of 10
CFR 50.12 and 50.60, to apply the KIm
calculational methodology of CE NPSD–
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77561-77563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31903]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-029-COL, 52-030-COL; ASLBP No. 09-879-04-COL-BD01]
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In the Matter of Progress
Energy Florida, Inc.; (Levy County Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
December 7, 2011.
Before Administrative Judges: Alex S. Karlin, Chairman, Dr. Anthony
J. Baratta, Dr. William M. Murphy.
Notice
(Opportunity To Make Oral or Written Limited Appearance Statements)
This Atomic Safety and Licensing Board hereby gives notice that it
will accept oral or written limited appearance statements from members
of the public regarding the application of Progress Energy Florida,
Inc. (PEF) to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for
a license to construct and operate two nuclear power plants in Levy
County, Florida. Two sessions to hear oral limited appearance
statements will be held on January 12, 2012, in Crystal River, Florida.
I. Background and Scope of Proceeding
On December 8, 2008, the NRC published a notice in the Federal
Register that any interested person could file a challenge to PEF's
application to construct and operate two proposed nuclear power plants
in Levy County, Florida and could request an adjudicatory hearing
thereon. 73 FR 74,532 (Dec. 8, 2008) (ADAMS Accession No. ML083430114).
On February 6, 2009, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, the
Ecology Party of Florida, and the Green Party of Florida (Intervenors)
filed such a challenge and request.\1\ On February 23, 2009, this Board
was established to handle the matter and to preside over any contested
adjudicatory proceeding relating to the PEF application.\2\ On July 8,
2009, this Board granted the Intervenors' request, ruling that they had
shown standing and had raised at least one admissible contention. See
LBP-09-10, 70 NRC 51, 147 (2009) (ADAMS Accession No. ML091890822).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing by the Green
Party of Florida, the Ecology Party of Florida and Nuclear
Information and Resource Service (Feb. 6, 2009) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML090371107).
\2\ Progress Energy Florida, Inc.; Establishment of Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board, 74 FR 9113 (Mar. 2, 2009) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML090540936).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The scope of this contested adjudicatory proceeding, and thus the
appropriate scope of any limited appearance statements, is defined by
the contentions that have been raised by the Intervenors and that have
been admitted, i.e., have been ruled to satisfy the requirements set
forth in the relevant NRC regulation, 10 CFR 2.309(f)(1).\3\ The
Intervenors have proffered several contentions, but at this point only
one such admitted contention remains in litigation--Contention 4A.\4\
Contention 4A, therefore, defines the appropriate scope of any limited
appearance statements.\5\ Contention 4A reads as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In addition to the contested adjudicatory proceeding being
conducted by this Board, there will be an uncontested adjudicatory
proceeding concerning PEF's application to construct and operate the
two proposed nuclear power plants in Levy County. See 42 U.S.C.
2239(a)(i)(A). The content of the uncontested proceeding is not
within the scope of this adjudication. See ``Conduct of Mandatory
Hearings on Applications for Combined Licenses,'' Internal
Commission Procedures at IV-12--IV-21 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML11269A125).
\4\ Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Admitting Contention
4A) (February 2, 2011) at 20 (unpublished) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML110330394).
\5\ If additional contentions are subsequently admitted, or if
Contention 4A is subsequently settled, dismissed, or revised, then
the scope of this proceeding will change accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contention 4A: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
fails to comply with 10 CFR part 51 and the National Environmental
Policy Act because it fails to specifically and adequately address, and
inappropriately characterizes as SMALL, certain direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts, onsite and offsite, of constructing and operating
the proposed LNP facility:
A. Impacts to wetlands, floodplains, special aquatic sites, and
other waters, associated with dewatering, specifically:
1. Impacts resulting from active and passive dewatering;
2. Impacts resulting from the connection of the site to the
underlying Floridan aquifer system;
3. Impacts on Outstanding Florida Waters such as the Withlacoochee
and Waccasassa Rivers;
4. Impacts on water quality and the aquatic environment due to
alterations and increases in nutrient concentrations caused by the
removal of water; and
5. Impacts on water quality and the aquatic environment due to
increased nutrients resulting from destructive wildfires resulting from
dewatering.
B. Impacts to wetlands, floodplains, special aquatic sites, and
other waters, associated with salt drift and salt deposition resulting
from cooling towers (that use salt water) being situated in an inland,
freshwater wetland area of the LNP site.
[[Page 77562]]
C. As a result of the omissions and inadequacies described above,
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement also failed to adequately
identify, and inappropriately characterizes as SMALL, the proposed
project's zone of:
1. Environmental impacts;
2. Impact on Federally listed species;
3. Irreversible and irretrievable environmental impacts; and
4. Appropriate mitigation measures.
As specified below, members of the public are invited to submit
oral or written statements, referred to as ``limited appearance
statements'' related to Contention 4A.
II. Notice of Oral Limited Appearance Statement Sessions
A. Date, Time, and Location of Oral Limited Appearance Statement
Sessions
The oral limited appearance statement sessions will be held on the
following dates, at the specified location and times:
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012.
Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Location: Plantation Inn Resort, 9301 West Fort Island Trail,
Crystal River, Florida.
B. Participation Guidelines for Oral Limited Appearance Statements
The purpose of the limited appearance statements is to allow
members of the public who are not parties to the adjudication to
provide the Board with statements setting forth their positions or
concerns on matters relating to the admitted contentions.\6\ Such
statements may be presented orally during the limited appearance
sessions specified above or may be submitted in writing. Speakers
should be aware, however, that the jurisdiction of this Board and the
scope of this proceeding are limited to the PEF application, and, more
particularly, to Contention 4A. Limited appearance statements enable
members of the public to alert the Board to areas relating to the PEF
application and the admitted contention where evidence may need to be
adduced, and to assist the Board in its consideration of these issues.
Oral limited appearance statements will be transcribed but are not
under oath or affirmation and do not constitute formal testimony or
evidence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The parties to the adjudication (acting via their officers,
directors, lawyers, pro-se representatives, experts, and other
witnesses) have the opportunity to file formal motions and other
pleadings, and to submit testimony and other evidence in the
adjudication. Thus, the parties are not entitled to make limited
appearance statements. 10 CFR 2.315(a). In contrast, limited
appearance statements are the opportunity for the public to provide
input.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oral limited appearance statements will be entertained during the
hours specified above, or such lesser time as may be sufficient to
accommodate the speakers who are present. If all scheduled and
unscheduled speakers present at a session have made a presentation, the
Board reserves the right to terminate the session before the ending
times listed above.
In order to allow all interested persons an opportunity to address
the Board, the time allotted for each oral limited appearance statement
will be no more than five minutes, and may be further limited depending
on the number of written requests to make an oral statement that are
submitted in accordance with section C below and/or the number of
persons present at the designated times. At the outset of each
statement, the speaker should identify himself or herself.
Members of the public who plan to attend the limited appearance
sessions are advised that security measures may be employed at the
entrance to the facility, including searches of hand-carried items such
as briefcases or backpacks. Signs no larger than 18'' by 18'' will be
permitted during the limited appearance sessions, but may not be
attached to sticks, held up, or moved about in the room. Cf. Policy
Statement on Enhancing Public Participation in NRC Meetings, 67 FR
36,920, 36,923 (May 28, 2002).
C. Submitting a Request To Make an Oral Limited Appearance Statement
Persons wishing to make an oral statement who have submitted a
timely written request to do so will be given priority over those who
have not filed such a request. To be considered timely, a written
request to make an oral statement must be mailed, faxed, or sent by
email so as to be received by the Board by 5 p.m. EST on Thursday,
January 5, 2011. The request should specify the session (afternoon or
evening) during which the requester wishes to make an oral statement.
Based on its review of the requests received by the deadline, the Board
reserves the right to cancel or shorten either of the sessions due to a
lack of public interest.
Written requests to make an oral statement should be submitted to:
Mail: Office of the Secretary, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Fax: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966).
Email: hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
In addition, using the same method of service, a copy of the
written request to make an oral statement should be sent to the
Chairman of this Licensing Board as follows:
Mail: Alex S. Karlin, Chairman, c/o: Matthew E. Flyntz, Law Clerk,
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, Mail Stop T-3 E2C, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Fax: (301) 415-5599 (verification (301) 415-7405).
Email: Matthew.Flyntz@nrc.gov and Sara.Culler@nrc.gov.
D. Written Limited Appearance Statements
A written limited appearance statement may be submitted to the
Board in addition to, or in lieu of, an oral limited appearance
statement. The Board encourages early submissions, however, so that
Board members will be able to consider them while addressing the issues
in this proceeding. Such statements should be sent to the Office of the
Secretary using the methods prescribed above, with a copy to the Board
Chairman. A person who has already filed a written limited appearance
statement in this matter is not required to resubmit it, but should
notify the Board, as specified above, if he or she wishes to make an
oral statement during the January sessions.
III. Availability of Documentary Information Regarding the Proceeding
Documents relating to this proceeding are available for public
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room (PDR) or
electronically from the publicly available records component of NRC's
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is
accessible by clicking ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search'' on the NRC Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR reference staff
by telephone at (800) 397-4209, (301) 415-4737, or by email to
pdr@nrc.gov.
IV. Scheduling Information Updates
Any updated/revised scheduling information regarding the limited
appearance sessions can be found on the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm or by calling
(800) 368-5642, extension 5036, or (301) 415-5036.
December 7, 2011.
It is so ordered.
[[Page 77563]]
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Administrative Judge, Rockville, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2011-31903 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P