New York Fun Factory Fireworks Display, Western Long Island Sound; Mamaroneck, NY, 77175-77178 [2011-31702]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 238 / Monday, December 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) In the case of a building for
residential use (with one to four units),
the density is not increased beyond four
units, and the land use is not changed;
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 14, 2011.
´
Mercedes M. Marquez,
Assistant Secretary for Community Planning
and Development.
[FR Doc. 2011–31629 Filed 12–9–11; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Lieutenant Eunice
James, Coast Guard Sector New York
Waterways Management Division; (718)
354–4163, email
Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0999]
RIN 1625–AA00
New York Fun Factory Fireworks
Display, Western Long Island Sound;
Mamaroneck, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of western Long Island
Sound in the vicinity of Mamaroneck,
NY in support of the New York Fun
Factory Fireworks display. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on the navigable waters and to
protect mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with fireworks
display. Vessels will be prohibited from
entering, transiting, mooring or
anchoring within the proposed zone
during the enforcement period unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) New York or the designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 10, 2012.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
January 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0999 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Dec 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0999),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77175
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0999’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0999’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before January 3, 2012,
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231, 1233; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 454, 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C.
191, 195; Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat.
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
77176
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 238 / Monday, December 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
2064; and Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define regulatory safety zones.
On May 10, 2012 New York Fun
Factory Events is sponsoring a fireworks
display on the waters of western Long
Island Sound, Mamaroneck, NY, no rain
date is scheduled for this event. Due to
the need to protect mariners and
spectators from the hazards associated
with fireworks display, such as the
accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles and falling embers
or other debris, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted within 240 yards
radius of the launch platform.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a temporary safety zone on the waters of
western Long Island Sound to ensure
the safety of spectators and vessels from
hazards associated with the fireworks
display.
The fireworks display is scheduled to
occur on May 10, 2012 from 9:30 p.m.
until 9:45 p.m. In order to ensure the
area is clear of persons and vessels
before the display begins, and to allow
sufficient time after the fireworks end to
ensure no explosive hazards remain,
this proposed rule will be enforced from
9 p.m. until 10:15 p.m. on May 10, 2012.
In the interest of public safety, general
navigation within the proposed safety
zone will be restricted during the
specified date and times. All persons
and vessels will be required to comply
with the instructions of the COTP New
York or the designated representative.
Vessels entering into, transiting through,
mooring or anchoring within the
proposed zone during the enforcement
period will be prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP New York, or
the designated representative, who may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Public notifications will be made to
the local maritime community prior to
the event through the Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Dec 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has not been designated a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed this regulation under
Executive Order 12866.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. Although this regulation
may have some impact on the public,
the potential impact will be minimized
for the following reasons: The safety
zone will be in effect for a limited
duration, the zone is of limited size,
vessels may transit around the restricted
area, and notifications will be made to
the local maritime community via the
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners well in advance of
this event.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the zone will only be in
place for a limited duration, one hour
and 15 minutes; it is limited in size; and
maritime advisories will be issued
allowing mariners to adjust their plans
accordingly.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in that portion of western
Long Island Sound from 9 p.m. to 10:15
p.m. on May 10, 2012.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 238 / Monday, December 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves establishing a safety zone
around a fireworks display. The
fireworks will be launched from a barge
and the safety zone is intended to keep
mariners away from potential hazards
associated with fireworks displays. As
such, it appears that this action will
qualify for Coast Guard Categorical
Exclusions (34)(g), as described in figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water) Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
Technical Standards
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Dec 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77177
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0999 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T01–0999 Safety Zone; New York
Fun Factory Fireworks Display, Western
Long Island Sound; Mamaroneck, NY.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: All navigable waters of
western Long Island Sound in the
vicinity of Mamaroneck, NY and within
240-yards from a fireworks barge located
in approximate position 40°56′22.51″ N;
073°43′05.93″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Definition. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated Representative. A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the COTP, Sector
New York to act on his or her behalf.
The designated representative may be
on an official patrol vessel or may be on
shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF–FM radio or loudhailer.
In addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official
patrol vessels may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(3) Spectators. All persons and vessels
not registered with the event sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels.
(c) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) Spectators or other vessels shall
not anchor, block, loiter, or impede the
transit of event participants or official
patrol vessels in the regulated area
during the effective date and times.
(3) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel or the designated
representative, by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of the
vessel shall proceed as directed. Failure
to comply with a lawful direction may
result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated area
shall contact the COTP or the
designated representative via VHF
channel 16 or (718) 354–4353 (Sector
New York command center) to obtain
permission to do so.
(d) Effective Period. This regulation
will be effective and enforced from
9 p.m. until 10:15 p.m. on May 10, 2012.
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
77178
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 238 / Monday, December 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Dated: November 21, 2011.
L.L. Fagan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2011–31702 Filed 12–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0796, FRL–9504–1]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New York State
Ozone Implementation Plan Revision
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
proposed revision to the New York State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone
concerning the control of volatile
organic compounds. The proposed SIP
revision consists of amendments to title
6 of the New York Codes, Rules and
Regulations part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating
Processes, Commercial and Industrial
Adhesives, Sealants and Primers,’’ part
234, ‘‘Graphic Arts,’’ and part 241,
‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt Based
Surface Coating.’’ The intended effect of
this action is to approve control
strategies, required by the Clean Air Act,
which will result in emission reductions
that will help attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards
for ozone.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket Number EPA–R02–
OAR–2011–0796, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov
• Fax: (212) 637–3901
• Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866.
• Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner,
Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding federal holidays.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Dec 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0796.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters or any form of—
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007–1866. EPA requests, if
at all possible, that you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to
4 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk
J. Wieber (wieber.kirk@epa.gov), Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866, (212) 637–3381.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is required by the Clean Air Act (Act)
and how does it apply to New York?
A. What is the history and time frame for
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submissions?
B. What are the moderate area
requirements?
II. What was included in New York’s
submittals?
III. What is EPA’s evaluation of Part 228,
‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial
and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and
Primers?’’
A. Background
B. What are the requirements of Part 228,
‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial
and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and
Primers?’’
C. What is EPA’s evaluation?
IV. What is EPA’s evaluation of Part 234,
‘‘Graphic Arts?’’
A. Background
B. What are the requirements of Part 234,
‘‘Graphic Arts?’’
C. What is EPA’s evaluation?
V. What is EPA’s Evaluation of Part 241,
‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt Based
Surface Coating?’’
A. Background
B. What are the requirements of Part 241,
‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt Based
Surface Coating?’’
C. What is EPA’s evaluation?
VI. What is EPA’s conclusion?
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is required by the Clean Air Act
(Act) and how does it apply to New
York?
A. What is the history and time frame
for State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submissions?
In 1997, EPA revised the health-based
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS or standard) for ozone, setting
it at 0.08 parts per million averaged over
an 8-hour period. EPA set the 8-hour
ozone standard based on scientific
evidence demonstrating that ozone
causes adverse health effects at lower
ozone concentrations and over longer
periods of time than was understood
when the pre-existing 1-hour ozone
standard was set. EPA determined that
the 8-hour standard would be more
protective of human health, especially
with regard to children and adults who
are active outdoors, and individuals
with a pre-existing respiratory disease,
such as asthma.
On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858), EPA
finalized its attainment/nonattainment
designations for areas across the country
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 238 (Monday, December 12, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77175-77178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31702]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0999]
RIN 1625-AA00
New York Fun Factory Fireworks Display, Western Long Island
Sound; Mamaroneck, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of western Long Island Sound in the vicinity of
Mamaroneck, NY in support of the New York Fun Factory Fireworks
display. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on
the navigable waters and to protect mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with fireworks display. Vessels will be prohibited
from entering, transiting, mooring or anchoring within the proposed
zone during the enforcement period unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP) New York or the designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 10, 2012.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before January 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0999 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Lieutenant Eunice James, Coast Guard Sector New
York Waterways Management Division; (718) 354-4163, email
Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0999), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0999'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0999'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before January 3, 2012, using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231,
1233; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 454, 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat.
[[Page 77176]]
2064; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to define regulatory safety
zones.
On May 10, 2012 New York Fun Factory Events is sponsoring a
fireworks display on the waters of western Long Island Sound,
Mamaroneck, NY, no rain date is scheduled for this event. Due to the
need to protect mariners and spectators from the hazards associated
with fireworks display, such as the accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles and falling embers or other debris, vessel
traffic will be temporarily restricted within 240 yards radius of the
launch platform.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone on
the waters of western Long Island Sound to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels from hazards associated with the fireworks
display.
The fireworks display is scheduled to occur on May 10, 2012 from
9:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. In order to ensure the area is clear of
persons and vessels before the display begins, and to allow sufficient
time after the fireworks end to ensure no explosive hazards remain,
this proposed rule will be enforced from 9 p.m. until 10:15 p.m. on May
10, 2012.
In the interest of public safety, general navigation within the
proposed safety zone will be restricted during the specified date and
times. All persons and vessels will be required to comply with the
instructions of the COTP New York or the designated representative.
Vessels entering into, transiting through, mooring or anchoring within
the proposed zone during the enforcement period will be prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP New York, or the designated
representative, who may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Public notifications will be made to the local maritime community
prior to the event through the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this regulation under
Executive Order 12866.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this
regulation may have some impact on the public, the potential impact
will be minimized for the following reasons: The safety zone will be in
effect for a limited duration, the zone is of limited size, vessels may
transit around the restricted area, and notifications will be made to
the local maritime community via the Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners well in advance of this event.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the zone will only be in place for a
limited duration, one hour and 15 minutes; it is limited in size; and
maritime advisories will be issued allowing mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in that portion of western Long Island
Sound from 9 p.m. to 10:15 p.m. on May 10, 2012.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or
[[Page 77177]]
more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b) (2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves establishing a safety zone around a fireworks display.
The fireworks will be launched from a barge and the safety zone is
intended to keep mariners away from potential hazards associated with
fireworks displays. As such, it appears that this action will qualify
for Coast Guard Categorical Exclusions (34)(g), as described in figure
2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water) Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0999 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0999 Safety Zone; New York Fun Factory Fireworks
Display, Western Long Island Sound; Mamaroneck, NY.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: All
navigable waters of western Long Island Sound in the vicinity of
Mamaroneck, NY and within 240-yards from a fireworks barge located in
approximate position 40[deg]56'22.51'' N; 073[deg]43'05.93'' W (NAD
83).
(b) Definition. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated Representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the COTP, Sector New York to act
on his or her behalf. The designated representative may be on an
official patrol vessel or may be on shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In addition, members of the
Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of this
regulation.
(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
(3) Spectators. All persons and vessels not registered with the
event sponsor as participants or official patrol vessels.
(c) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) Spectators or other vessels shall not anchor, block, loiter, or
impede the transit of event participants or official patrol vessels in
the regulated area during the effective date and times.
(3) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel or the
designated representative, by siren, radio, flashing light or other
means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed as directed. Failure to
comply with a lawful direction may result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated area shall contact the COTP or the designated representative
via VHF channel 16 or (718) 354-4353 (Sector New York command center)
to obtain permission to do so.
(d) Effective Period. This regulation will be effective and
enforced from 9 p.m. until 10:15 p.m. on May 10, 2012.
[[Page 77178]]
Dated: November 21, 2011.
L.L. Fagan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2011-31702 Filed 12-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P