Alternatives to the Use of External Credit Ratings in the Regulations of the OCC, 76905-76906 [2011-31574]
Download as PDF
76905
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 237
Friday, December 9, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 1700
RIN 0572–AC23
Extension of Comment Period for
Proposed Rulemaking on Substantially
Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA)
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice of extension of public
comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) is extending until January 17,
2012, the period for public comment on
the proposal to issue regulations in
order to provide loans and grants to
facilitate the construction, acquisition,
or improvement of infrastructure
projects in Substantially Underserved
Trust Areas (SUTA).
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 17, 2012, to ensure full
consideration.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments by either
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
instructions for submitting comments
for Docket ID RUS–11–AGENCY–0004.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send your comment addressed to
Michele Brooks, Director, Program
Development and Regulatory Analysis,
USDA Rural Development, 1400
Independence Avenue, STOP 1522,
Room 5159, Washington, DC 20250–
1522.
Additional information about the
Agency and its programs is available on
the Internet at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michele Brooks, Director, Program
Development and Regulatory Analysis,
Rural Utilities Service, Rural
Development, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 1510, Room 5135–S,
Washington, DC 20250–1590.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Dec 08, 2011
Jkt 226001
Telephone number: (202) 720–9542,
Facsimile: (202) 720–1725.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 14, 2011, at 76 FR 63846, RUS
published a proposed rule to issue
regulations in order to provide loans
and grants to facilitate the construction,
acquisition, or improvement of
infrastructure projects in Substantially
Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA). The
RUS loan, loan guarantee and grant
programs act as a catalyst for economic
and community development. By
financing improvements to rural
electric, water and waste, and telecom
and broadband infrastructure, RUS also
plays a big role in improving other
measures of quality of life in rural
America, including public health and
safety, environmental protection,
conservation, and cultural and historic
preservation.
The 2008 Farm Bill (Pub. L. 110–246,
codified at 7 U.S.C. 906f) authorized the
Substantially Underserved Trust Area
(SUTA) initiative. The SUTA initiative
gives the Secretary of Agriculture
certain discretionary authorities relating
to financial assistance terms and
conditions that can enhance the
financing possibilities in areas that are
underserved by certain RUS electric,
water and waste, and telecom and
broadband programs.
The proposed rule invited the public
to submit comments by December 13,
2011. The RUS is now extending the
period for submission of public
comments until January 17, 2012.
Dated: November 5, 2011.
James R. Newby,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–31575 Filed 12–8–2011; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 5
[Docket ID OCC–2011–0019]
RIN 1557–AD36
Alternatives to the Use of External
Credit Ratings in the Regulations of
the OCC
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Department of the Treasury.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correcting amendment.
ACTION:
This notice of proposed
rulemaking makes technical corrections
to the notice of proposed rulemaking
concerning alternatives to the use of
external credit ratings that was
published on November 29, 2011 to
correct a mischaracterization of section
939(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Kaminski, Senior Attorney, Legislative
and Regulatory Activities Division,
(202) 874–5090, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On November 29, 2011, the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) seeking comment
on a proposal to revise its regulations
pertaining to investment securities,
securities offerings, and foreign bank
capital equivalency deposits to replace
references to credit ratings with
alternative standards of
creditworthiness.1 The OCC also sought
comment on proposed amendments to
its regulations pertaining to financial
subsidiaries of national banks to better
reflect the language of the underlying
statute, as amended by section 939(d) of
the Dodd-Frank Act.
The National Bank Act currently
permits a national bank that is one of
the 100 largest insured banks to control
a financial subsidiary, directly or
indirectly, or to hold an interest in a
financial subsidiary only if the bank has
at least one issue of outstanding debt
rated in one of the top three investment
grade categories by a nationally
recognized statistical rating organization
(NRSRO).2 A national bank that is one
of the second 50 largest insured banks
may either satisfy this requirement or
may satisfy such other criteria as the
Secretary of the Treasury and the
Federal Reserve Board may establish
jointly by regulation. This
creditworthiness requirement does not
apply to national banks that are not
among the largest 100 insured banks.
Section 939(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act
amended the creditworthiness
requirement to remove the reference to
nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (NRSRO) ratings and to
SUMMARY:
1 76
2 12
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
FR 73626 (November 29, 2011).
U.S.C. 24a.
09DEP1
76906
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2011 / Proposed Rules
make other revisions to the provision.
Thus, effective on July 21, 2012, a
national bank that is one of the 100
largest insured banks may control a
financial subsidiary, directly or
indirectly, or hold an interest in a
financial subsidiary only if the bank has
not fewer than one issue of outstanding
debt that meets such standards of
creditworthiness or other criteria as the
Secretary of the Treasury and the
Federal Reserve Board may jointly
establish.
The proposed revisions to the OCC’s
rules at 12 CFR 5.39 in the November
29 NPRM inaccurately characterized the
creditworthiness requirement, leaving
the erroneous impression that only a
national bank that is among the 100
largest insured banks could control or
hold an interest in financial subsidiary.
This notice makes a technical correction
to the regulatory text in the NPRM so
that the characterization of the DoddFrank Act amendment is accurate. As is
the case under current law, the
creditworthiness requirement does not
apply to an insured depository
institution that is not among the largest
100 insured depository institutions and
therefore does not affect the ability of
such an institution to control or hold an
interest in a financial subsidiary. The
technical correction made in this notice
also does not affect the content or
substance of the alternative standards of
creditworthiness in the November 29
NPRM or in the supervisory guidance
that was published at the same time.
Regulatory Analysis
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The November 29 notice of proposed
rulemaking would amend several
regulations for which the OCC currently
has approved collections of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520) (OMB Control Nos.
1557–0014; 1557–0190; 1557–0120;
1557–0205). Neither the amendments in
the November 29 proposal, nor this
revision to it, introduce any new
collections of information into the rules,
nor do they amend the rules in a way
that substantively modifies the
collections of information that OMB has
previously approved. Therefore, no
additional OMB PRA approval is
required at this time.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act,3 (RFA), the
regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise
required under section 604 of the RFA
is not required if an agency certifies that
the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (defined for
purposes of the RFA to include banks
with assets less than or equal to $175
million) and publishes its certification
and a short, explanatory statement in
the Federal Register along with its rule.
The November 29 proposal would
affect all 578 small national banks and
all 288 small federally chartered savings
associations.4 However, because banks
have long been expected to maintain a
risk management process to ensure that
credit risk is effectively identified,
measured, monitored, and controlled,
most if not all of the institutions
affected by the proposed rule already
engage in appropriate risk management
activity. Although the proposed rule
will affect a substantial number of small
banks and federally chartered savings
associations, it will not have a
significant effect on a substantial
number of those institutions. Therefore,
the OCC certifies that the proposed rule
would not have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–4 (UMRA) requires that an
agency prepare a budgetary impact
statement before promulgating a rule
that includes a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any one year. If a
budgetary impact statement is required,
section 205 of the UMRA also requires
an agency to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives before promulgating a rule.
The OCC has determined that its
proposed rule would not result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal
governments, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Accordingly, the
OCC has not prepared a budgetary
impact statement or specifically
addressed the regulatory alternatives
considered.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and
procedure, National banks, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Securities.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency is proposing to amend
Part 5 of chapter I of Title 12, Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 5—RULES, POLICIES, AND
PROCEDURES FOR CORPORATE
ACTIVITIES
2. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 93a, 215a–
2, 215a–3, 481, and section 5136A of the
Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a).
3. In section 5.39, revise paragraphs
(g)(3) through (4) and (j)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 5.39
Financial subsidiaries.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(3) If the national bank is one of the
100 largest insured banks, determined
on the basis of the bank’s consolidated
total assets at the end of the calendar
year, the bank has not fewer than one
issue of outstanding debt that meets
such standards of creditworthiness or
other criteria as the Secretary of the
Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board
may jointly establish pursuant to
Section 5136A of title LXII of the
Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a).
(4) Paragraph (g)(3) does not apply if
the financial subsidiary is engaged
solely in activities in an agency
capacity.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(2) Eligible debt requirement. A
national bank that does not continue to
meet the qualification requirement set
forth in paragraph (g)(3) of this section,
applicable where the bank’s financial
subsidiary is engaged in activities other
than solely in an agency capacity, may
not directly or through a subsidiary,
purchase or acquire any additional
equity capital of any such financial
subsidiary until the bank meets the
requirement in paragraph (g)(3) of this
section. For purposes of this paragraph
(j)(2), the term ‘‘equity capital’’
includes, in addition to any equity
investment, any debt instrument issued
by the financial subsidiary if the
instrument qualifies as capital of the
subsidiary under Federal or state law,
regulation, or interpretation applicable
to the subsidiary.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 2, 2011.
By the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency.
Julie L. Williams,
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief
Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–31574 Filed 12–8–11; 8:45 am]
35
U.S.C. 605(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Dec 08, 2011
4 All
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
totals are as of June 30, 2011.
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76905-76906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31574]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 5
[Docket ID OCC-2011-0019]
RIN 1557-AD36
Alternatives to the Use of External Credit Ratings in the
Regulations of the OCC
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Department of the
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of proposed rulemaking makes technical corrections
to the notice of proposed rulemaking concerning alternatives to the use
of external credit ratings that was published on November 29, 2011 to
correct a mischaracterization of section 939(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Kaminski, Senior Attorney,
Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, (202) 874-5090, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On November 29, 2011, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
(OCC) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) seeking comment
on a proposal to revise its regulations pertaining to investment
securities, securities offerings, and foreign bank capital equivalency
deposits to replace references to credit ratings with alternative
standards of creditworthiness.\1\ The OCC also sought comment on
proposed amendments to its regulations pertaining to financial
subsidiaries of national banks to better reflect the language of the
underlying statute, as amended by section 939(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 76 FR 73626 (November 29, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The National Bank Act currently permits a national bank that is one
of the 100 largest insured banks to control a financial subsidiary,
directly or indirectly, or to hold an interest in a financial
subsidiary only if the bank has at least one issue of outstanding debt
rated in one of the top three investment grade categories by a
nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO).\2\ A
national bank that is one of the second 50 largest insured banks may
either satisfy this requirement or may satisfy such other criteria as
the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board may
establish jointly by regulation. This creditworthiness requirement does
not apply to national banks that are not among the largest 100 insured
banks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 12 U.S.C. 24a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 939(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the creditworthiness
requirement to remove the reference to nationally recognized
statistical rating organization (NRSRO) ratings and to
[[Page 76906]]
make other revisions to the provision. Thus, effective on July 21,
2012, a national bank that is one of the 100 largest insured banks may
control a financial subsidiary, directly or indirectly, or hold an
interest in a financial subsidiary only if the bank has not fewer than
one issue of outstanding debt that meets such standards of
creditworthiness or other criteria as the Secretary of the Treasury and
the Federal Reserve Board may jointly establish.
The proposed revisions to the OCC's rules at 12 CFR 5.39 in the
November 29 NPRM inaccurately characterized the creditworthiness
requirement, leaving the erroneous impression that only a national bank
that is among the 100 largest insured banks could control or hold an
interest in financial subsidiary. This notice makes a technical
correction to the regulatory text in the NPRM so that the
characterization of the Dodd-Frank Act amendment is accurate. As is the
case under current law, the creditworthiness requirement does not apply
to an insured depository institution that is not among the largest 100
insured depository institutions and therefore does not affect the
ability of such an institution to control or hold an interest in a
financial subsidiary. The technical correction made in this notice also
does not affect the content or substance of the alternative standards
of creditworthiness in the November 29 NPRM or in the supervisory
guidance that was published at the same time.
Regulatory Analysis
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The November 29 notice of proposed rulemaking would amend several
regulations for which the OCC currently has approved collections of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520)
(OMB Control Nos. 1557-0014; 1557-0190; 1557-0120; 1557-0205). Neither
the amendments in the November 29 proposal, nor this revision to it,
introduce any new collections of information into the rules, nor do
they amend the rules in a way that substantively modifies the
collections of information that OMB has previously approved. Therefore,
no additional OMB PRA approval is required at this time.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,\3\
(RFA), the regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise required under
section 604 of the RFA is not required if an agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (defined for purposes of the RFA to include
banks with assets less than or equal to $175 million) and publishes its
certification and a short, explanatory statement in the Federal
Register along with its rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The November 29 proposal would affect all 578 small national banks
and all 288 small federally chartered savings associations.\4\ However,
because banks have long been expected to maintain a risk management
process to ensure that credit risk is effectively identified, measured,
monitored, and controlled, most if not all of the institutions affected
by the proposed rule already engage in appropriate risk management
activity. Although the proposed rule will affect a substantial number
of small banks and federally chartered savings associations, it will
not have a significant effect on a substantial number of those
institutions. Therefore, the OCC certifies that the proposed rule would
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ All totals are as of June 30, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law
104-4 (UMRA) requires that an agency prepare a budgetary impact
statement before promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate
that may result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million
or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. If a
budgetary impact statement is required, section 205 of the UMRA also
requires an agency to identify and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives before promulgating a rule.
The OCC has determined that its proposed rule would not result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal governments, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more. Accordingly, the OCC has not prepared
a budgetary impact statement or specifically addressed the regulatory
alternatives considered.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and procedure, National banks, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency is proposing to amend Part 5 of chapter I
of Title 12, Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 5--RULES, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES FOR CORPORATE ACTIVITIES
2. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 93a, 215a-2, 215a-3, 481, and
section 5136A of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a).
3. In section 5.39, revise paragraphs (g)(3) through (4) and (j)(2)
to read as follows:
Sec. 5.39 Financial subsidiaries.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(3) If the national bank is one of the 100 largest insured banks,
determined on the basis of the bank's consolidated total assets at the
end of the calendar year, the bank has not fewer than one issue of
outstanding debt that meets such standards of creditworthiness or other
criteria as the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board
may jointly establish pursuant to Section 5136A of title LXII of the
Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a).
(4) Paragraph (g)(3) does not apply if the financial subsidiary is
engaged solely in activities in an agency capacity.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(2) Eligible debt requirement. A national bank that does not
continue to meet the qualification requirement set forth in paragraph
(g)(3) of this section, applicable where the bank's financial
subsidiary is engaged in activities other than solely in an agency
capacity, may not directly or through a subsidiary, purchase or acquire
any additional equity capital of any such financial subsidiary until
the bank meets the requirement in paragraph (g)(3) of this section. For
purposes of this paragraph (j)(2), the term ``equity capital''
includes, in addition to any equity investment, any debt instrument
issued by the financial subsidiary if the instrument qualifies as
capital of the subsidiary under Federal or state law, regulation, or
interpretation applicable to the subsidiary.
* * * * *
Dated: December 2, 2011.
By the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Julie L. Williams,
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-31574 Filed 12-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P