Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Saginaw River, Bay City, MI, 76637-76640 [2011-31456]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.999, to read as follows:
§ 117.999
Blackwater River
The draw of the S189 bridge, mile 9.2
at South Quay, need not be opened for
the passage of vessels.
Dated: November 16, 2011.
William D. Lee,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–1013 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Lee Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District; telephone (216) 902–
6085, email Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2011–31455 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1013]
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
RIN 1625–AA09
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Saginaw River, Bay City, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
revise the drawbridge opening schedule
for the Lake State Railway Bridge at
mile 3.10, the Independence Bridge at
mile 3.88, the Central Michigan Railroad
Bridge at mile 4.94, the Liberty Street
Bridge at mile 4.99, the Veterans
Memorial Bridge at mile 5.60, and the
Lafayette Street Bridge at mile 6.78, all
over the Saginaw River at Bay City, MI.
The current regulation is confusing,
outdated, and unnecessarily restrictive
for both commercial and recreational
vessels. The proposed regulation will
simplify the regulatory language,
increase access through the drawbridges
for all vessels, and provide for the
reasonable needs of all traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or
before: January 9, 2012.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–1013),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76637
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1013’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
1013’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
76638
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Lake Carriers Association (LCA), an
organization representing U.S. shipping
companies on the Great Lakes,
requested that the existing drawbridge
regulation for Saginaw River be
reviewed and changed to make the
regulation easier to understand and to
remove restrictive drawbridge schedules
for commercial vessels. The existing
regulation was reviewed in its entirety
for all drawbridges, vessel types, dates,
and hours of operation.
Lake State Railway Bridge at mile 3.10
is a swing bridge that provides 7 feet
vertical clearance in the closed position
and unlimited clearance in the open
position. The Independence Bridge at
mile 3.88 is a bascule bridge that
provides 22 feet vertical clearance in the
closed position and unlimited clearance
in the open position. The Central
Michigan Railroad Bridge at mile 4.94 is
a swing bridge that provides 8 feet of
vertical clearance in the closed position
and unlimited clearance in the open
position. The Liberty Street Bridge at
mile 4.99 is a bascule bridge that
provides 25 feet of vertical clearance in
the closed position and unlimited
clearance in the open position. The
Veterans Memorial Bridge at mile 5.60
is a bascule bridge that provides 15 feet
of vertical clearance in the closed
position and unlimited clearance in the
open position. The Lafayette Street
Bridge at mile 6.78 is a bascule bridge
that provides 20 feet vertical clearance
in the closed position and unlimited
clearance in the open position. There is
no alternate waterway for vessels
entering or departing Saginaw River.
The draws of the Lake State Railway
and CN RR bridges currently open on
signal for all vessel traffic that requires
a bridge opening, except that from
December 16 through March 15 the
bridges open on signal if at least 12
hours advance notice is provided.
The draws of the Independence
Street, Liberty Street, Veterans
Memorial, and Lafayette Street
drawbridges open on signal from March
16 through December 15, except as
follows: the draws need not open for the
passage of vessels less than 50 gross
tons from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 3:30
p.m. to 5:30 p.m., except Saturdays,
Sundays, and holidays observed in the
locality. The draws need not open for
the passage of downbound vessels over
50 gross tons from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., except on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
Sundays, Federal holidays, and holidays
observed in the locality. From 8 a.m. to
8 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays, and
Federal holidays, the Independence
Street and Veterans Memorial bridges
need not open for recreational vessels
except from three minutes before to
three minutes after the hour and halfhour, and the Liberty Street and
Lafayette Street bridges need not open
for recreational vessels except from
three minutes before to three minutes
after the quarter-hour and three-quarter
hour. Currently, the draws of these
bridges shall open on signal from
December 16 through March 15 if at
least 12 hours advance notice is
provided.
The proposed drawbridge schedules
and revised regulation were developed
with all known stakeholders, including;
LCA, Canadian Shipowners Association,
local Coast Guard units, City of Bay
City, MI, Michigan Department of
Transportation (MDOT), Bay Harbor
Marina, Pier 7 Marina, Liberty Harbor
Marina, and Bay City Yacht Club. All
parties have preliminarily concurred
with the proposed drawbridge
schedules and language.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The preliminary investigation
conducted during the development of
this proposed rule found that marine
traffic on Saginaw River consists of large
commercial, small commercial, and
both power and sail recreational vessels.
Large commercial vessel traffic usually
operates from the beginning of April
until the end of December. Recreational
and small commercial vessel traffic
usually operates between April 15 and
November 1, and generally increases on
the weekends. Vehicular traffic has been
reduced in the past 20 years following
the closure of industrial and
manufacturing facilities in Bay City/
Saginaw, including reduced vehicular
traffic on weekends when recreational
vessel traffic increases.
Under the current regulation, the
highway drawbridges are not required to
open for recreational vessels from 6:30
a.m. to 8:30 a.m., and from 3:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m., 7 days a week. Additionally,
they are not required to open from 7:30
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m., Monday through Saturday, for the
passage of downbound vessels over 50
gross tons (all large commercial vessels).
The proposed rule will allow large
commercial vessels to obtain bridge
openings at any time, and allow
recreational vessels to pass on two
scheduled times each hour between 6:30
a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday through
Friday, and at any time during all other
days and times, thereby increasing
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
access through all drawbridges for all
vessel traffic. Furthermore, the dates for
winter operation of all drawbridges have
been adjusted to reflect the current
seasonal operations for both commercial
and recreational vessels. Currently,
vessels are required to provide at least
12-hours advance notice of arrival
between December 16 and March 15.
The proposed schedule will require 12hour advance notice of arrival between
January 1 and March 31.
The proposed drawbridge regulation
was developed to reflect the current
conditions and needs of both vessel and
vehicular traffic, and was coordinated
with all known stakeholders and
entities in Bay City/Saginaw, MI. The
proposed regulatory language is more
concise and easier to understand, has
been preliminarily approved by all
known entities included in the
development of the proposed rule, and
is expected to provide for the reasonable
balance of all modes of transportation.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
Executive Order 12866. The Office of
Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders. This
determination is based upon the Coast
Guard’s expectation that this proposed
rule will improve traffic congestion and
safety in the vicinity of the drawbridge
and does not exclude bridge openings
for vessel traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners and
operators needing to transit the bridges.
However, this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will
increase access through the drawbridges
for all entities compared to the existing
regulation and drawbridge schedule. All
known marina owners and small
entities were consulted during the
development of this proposed rule and
have preliminarily concurred with the
proposed drawbridge schedule.
Additionally, all vessels that do not
require bridge openings may transit the
drawbridges at any time.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Mr. Lee D.
Soule, Bridge Management Specialist,
U.S. Coast Guard, telephone (216) 902–
6085, email lee.d.soule@uscg.mil, or fax
(216) 902–6088. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76639
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment because it
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
revise 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.647 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
76640
§ 117.647
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Saginaw River.
(a) The draws of the Lake State
Railway Bridge, mile 3.10, and the
Central Michigan Railroad Bridge, mile
4.94, both in Bay City, shall open on
signal; except that from January 1
through March 31, the draws shall open
on signal if at least 12 hours advance
notice is provided.
(b) The draws of the Independence
Bridge, mile 3.88, Liberty Street Bridge,
mile 4.99, Veterans Memorial Bridge,
mile 5.60, and Lafayette Street Bridge,
mile 6.78, all in Bay City, shall open on
signal, except as follows:
(1) From April 15 through November
1, between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and
7 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays, the draws of the
Independence and Veterans Memorial
Bridges need open for the passage of
recreational vessels only from three
minutes before to three minutes after the
hour and half-hour, and the Liberty
Street and Lafayette Street bridges need
open for the passage of recreational
vessels only from three minutes before
to three minutes after the quarter-hour
and three-quarter hour.
(2) From January 1 through March 31,
the draws of these bridges shall open on
signal if at least 12 hours advance notice
is provided.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 9, 2011.
M.N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–31456 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
Deviation is scheduled to commence on
December 15, 2011 vice the December
19, 2011 date published in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. The Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking should reflect the
correct date of December 15, 2011. This
error does not impact the Test
Deviation.
This correction is effective
December 8, 2011.
DATES:
For
information about this correction,
contact Erin Anderson, Office of
Regulations and Administrative Law,
telephone (202) 372–3849, email
erin.w.anderson@uscg.mil. For
information about the original
regulation, contact Donna Gagliano,
Coast Guard; telephone (504) 671–2128,
email Donna.Gagliano@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Vol.
76, No. 232, USCG 2011–0959,
appearing on page 75507 in the issue of
Friday, December 2, 2011, the following
correction is made:
1. On page 75507, in the first column,
in the one place that ‘‘December 19,
2011’’ appears, remove ‘‘December 19,
2011’’ and replace with ‘‘December 15,
2011’’.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: December 2, 2011.
Kathryn Sinniger,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2011–31454 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ARCHITECTURAL AND
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS
COMPLIANCE BOARD
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
36 CFR Parts 1193 and 1194
[Docket No. 2011–07]
Coast Guard
RIN 3014–AA37
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0959]
Telecommunications Act Accessibility
Guidelines; Electronic and Information
Technology Accessibility Standards
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway (Algiers
Alternate Route), Belle Chasse, LA
AGENCY:
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking;
Correction.
ACTION:
In the Federal Register
published on December 2, 2011, the
Coast Guard placed the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway (Algiers Alternate Route),
Belle Chasse, LA. That publication
contained an error in the ‘‘Discussion of
Proposed Rule’’ section stating an
incorrect date of the Test Deviation
issued in conjunction with the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. The Test
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
The Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) is issuing this
second Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) to continue the
process of updating its standards for
electronic and information technology,
which apply to federal agencies, and its
guidelines for telecommunications
accessibility, which apply to
telecommunications manufacturers. The
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
text of the proposed standards and
guidelines under consideration by the
Board is available on the Board’s Web
site (https://www.access-board.gov/508.
htm). The Board invites the public to
review and comment on all aspects of
this notice and the proposed text,
including the advantages and
disadvantages of provisions, the
organizational approach to presenting
the standards and guidelines, alternative
policies to those presented, and
information on benefits and costs. After
reviewing the comments received in
response to this advance notice, the
Board plans to issue a proposed rule
seeking further public comment
followed by a final rule.
DATES: Comments should be received by
March 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number 2011–07 or
RIN number 3014–AA37, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Regulations.gov Docket ID is ATBCB–
2011–0007.
• Email: ictrule@access-board.gov.
Include docket number 2011–07 or RIN
number 3014–AA37 in the subject line
of the message.
• Fax: (202) 272–0081.
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Office of Technical and Information
Services, Access Board, 1331 F Street
NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC
20004–1111.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Creagan, Office of Technical
and Information Services, Access Board,
1331 F Street NW., suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20004–1111.
Telephone number: (202) 272–0016
(voice); (202) 272–0074 (TTY).
Electronic mail address: creagan@
access-board.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory History
The (Section 508) Electronic and
Information Technology Accessibility
Standards (standards) were issued in
December 2000, 65 FR 80500 (December
21, 2000). The (Section 255)
Telecommunications Act Accessibility
Guidelines (guidelines) for
telecommunications equipment and
customer premises equipment were
issued in February 1998, 63 FR 5608
(February 3, 1998). The standards
require that when developing,
procuring, maintaining, or using
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 236 (Thursday, December 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76637-76640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31456]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1013]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Saginaw River, Bay City, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to revise the drawbridge opening
schedule for the Lake State Railway Bridge at mile 3.10, the
Independence Bridge at mile 3.88, the Central Michigan Railroad Bridge
at mile 4.94, the Liberty Street Bridge at mile 4.99, the Veterans
Memorial Bridge at mile 5.60, and the Lafayette Street Bridge at mile
6.78, all over the Saginaw River at Bay City, MI. The current
regulation is confusing, outdated, and unnecessarily restrictive for
both commercial and recreational vessels. The proposed regulation will
simplify the regulatory language, increase access through the
drawbridges for all vessels, and provide for the reasonable needs of
all traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before: January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-1013 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Lee Soule, Bridge Management Specialist, Ninth
Coast Guard District; telephone (216) 902-6085, email
Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-1013), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rules'' and insert ``USCG-2011-1013'' in the ``Keyword''
box. Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the
``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-1013'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please
[[Page 76638]]
explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Lake Carriers Association (LCA), an organization representing U.S.
shipping companies on the Great Lakes, requested that the existing
drawbridge regulation for Saginaw River be reviewed and changed to make
the regulation easier to understand and to remove restrictive
drawbridge schedules for commercial vessels. The existing regulation
was reviewed in its entirety for all drawbridges, vessel types, dates,
and hours of operation.
Lake State Railway Bridge at mile 3.10 is a swing bridge that
provides 7 feet vertical clearance in the closed position and unlimited
clearance in the open position. The Independence Bridge at mile 3.88 is
a bascule bridge that provides 22 feet vertical clearance in the closed
position and unlimited clearance in the open position. The Central
Michigan Railroad Bridge at mile 4.94 is a swing bridge that provides 8
feet of vertical clearance in the closed position and unlimited
clearance in the open position. The Liberty Street Bridge at mile 4.99
is a bascule bridge that provides 25 feet of vertical clearance in the
closed position and unlimited clearance in the open position. The
Veterans Memorial Bridge at mile 5.60 is a bascule bridge that provides
15 feet of vertical clearance in the closed position and unlimited
clearance in the open position. The Lafayette Street Bridge at mile
6.78 is a bascule bridge that provides 20 feet vertical clearance in
the closed position and unlimited clearance in the open position. There
is no alternate waterway for vessels entering or departing Saginaw
River.
The draws of the Lake State Railway and CN RR bridges currently
open on signal for all vessel traffic that requires a bridge opening,
except that from December 16 through March 15 the bridges open on
signal if at least 12 hours advance notice is provided.
The draws of the Independence Street, Liberty Street, Veterans
Memorial, and Lafayette Street drawbridges open on signal from March 16
through December 15, except as follows: the draws need not open for the
passage of vessels less than 50 gross tons from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays
observed in the locality. The draws need not open for the passage of
downbound vessels over 50 gross tons from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and
4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., except on Sundays, Federal holidays, and
holidays observed in the locality. From 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal holidays, the Independence Street and Veterans
Memorial bridges need not open for recreational vessels except from
three minutes before to three minutes after the hour and half-hour, and
the Liberty Street and Lafayette Street bridges need not open for
recreational vessels except from three minutes before to three minutes
after the quarter-hour and three-quarter hour. Currently, the draws of
these bridges shall open on signal from December 16 through March 15 if
at least 12 hours advance notice is provided.
The proposed drawbridge schedules and revised regulation were
developed with all known stakeholders, including; LCA, Canadian
Shipowners Association, local Coast Guard units, City of Bay City, MI,
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), Bay Harbor Marina, Pier 7
Marina, Liberty Harbor Marina, and Bay City Yacht Club. All parties
have preliminarily concurred with the proposed drawbridge schedules and
language.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The preliminary investigation conducted during the development of
this proposed rule found that marine traffic on Saginaw River consists
of large commercial, small commercial, and both power and sail
recreational vessels. Large commercial vessel traffic usually operates
from the beginning of April until the end of December. Recreational and
small commercial vessel traffic usually operates between April 15 and
November 1, and generally increases on the weekends. Vehicular traffic
has been reduced in the past 20 years following the closure of
industrial and manufacturing facilities in Bay City/Saginaw, including
reduced vehicular traffic on weekends when recreational vessel traffic
increases.
Under the current regulation, the highway drawbridges are not
required to open for recreational vessels from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.,
and from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., 7 days a week. Additionally, they are
not required to open from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m., Monday through Saturday, for the passage of downbound vessels
over 50 gross tons (all large commercial vessels). The proposed rule
will allow large commercial vessels to obtain bridge openings at any
time, and allow recreational vessels to pass on two scheduled times
each hour between 6:30 a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday through Friday, and at
any time during all other days and times, thereby increasing access
through all drawbridges for all vessel traffic. Furthermore, the dates
for winter operation of all drawbridges have been adjusted to reflect
the current seasonal operations for both commercial and recreational
vessels. Currently, vessels are required to provide at least 12-hours
advance notice of arrival between December 16 and March 15. The
proposed schedule will require 12-hour advance notice of arrival
between January 1 and March 31.
The proposed drawbridge regulation was developed to reflect the
current conditions and needs of both vessel and vehicular traffic, and
was coordinated with all known stakeholders and entities in Bay City/
Saginaw, MI. The proposed regulatory language is more concise and
easier to understand, has been preliminarily approved by all known
entities included in the development of the proposed rule, and is
expected to provide for the reasonable balance of all modes of
transportation.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
This determination is based upon the Coast Guard's expectation that
this proposed rule will improve traffic congestion and safety in the
vicinity of the drawbridge and does not exclude bridge openings for
vessel traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule
[[Page 76639]]
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The proposed rule would affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: the owners and operators needing
to transit the bridges. However, this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This rule will increase access through the
drawbridges for all entities compared to the existing regulation and
drawbridge schedule. All known marina owners and small entities were
consulted during the development of this proposed rule and have
preliminarily concurred with the proposed drawbridge schedule.
Additionally, all vessels that do not require bridge openings may
transit the drawbridges at any time.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone (216) 902-6085,
email lee.d.soule@uscg.mil, or fax (216) 902-6088. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment because it simply promulgates the
operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to revise 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise Sec. 117.647 to read as follows:
[[Page 76640]]
Sec. 117.647 Saginaw River.
(a) The draws of the Lake State Railway Bridge, mile 3.10, and the
Central Michigan Railroad Bridge, mile 4.94, both in Bay City, shall
open on signal; except that from January 1 through March 31, the draws
shall open on signal if at least 12 hours advance notice is provided.
(b) The draws of the Independence Bridge, mile 3.88, Liberty Street
Bridge, mile 4.99, Veterans Memorial Bridge, mile 5.60, and Lafayette
Street Bridge, mile 6.78, all in Bay City, shall open on signal, except
as follows:
(1) From April 15 through November 1, between the hours of 6:30
a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, the
draws of the Independence and Veterans Memorial Bridges need open for
the passage of recreational vessels only from three minutes before to
three minutes after the hour and half-hour, and the Liberty Street and
Lafayette Street bridges need open for the passage of recreational
vessels only from three minutes before to three minutes after the
quarter-hour and three-quarter hour.
(2) From January 1 through March 31, the draws of these bridges
shall open on signal if at least 12 hours advance notice is provided.
* * * * *
Dated: November 9, 2011.
M.N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011-31456 Filed 12-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P