Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Empowering Women and Girls Through Sports, 76802-76808 [2011-31392]
Download as PDF
76802
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
11/23/2011, Private Non-Profit
organizations that provide essential
services of governmental nature may file
disaster loan applications at the address
listed above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Cibola, Sandoval, and
the Pueblo of Acoma and the
Pueblo of Santa Clara.
The Interest Rates are:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Non-Profit Organizations With
Credit Available Elsewhere
Non-Profit
Organizations
Without Credit Available
Elsewhere ..........................
For Economic Injury:
Non-Profit
Organizations
Without Credit Available
Elsewhere ..........................
3.250
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 02/02–0646]
3.000
James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–31550 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 02/02–0646]
Riverside Micro-Cap Fund II, L.P.;
Notice Seeking Exemption Under
Section 312 of the Small Business
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2011–31547 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
3.000
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008).
Notice is hereby given that Riverside
Micro-Cap Fund II, L.P., 45 Rockefeller
Center, New York, NY 10111, a Federal
Licensee under the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, as amended
(‘‘the Act’’), in connection with the
financing of a small concern, has sought
an exemption under Section 312 of the
Act and Section 107.730, Financings
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of
the Small Business Administration
(‘‘SBA’’) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR
107.730). Riverside Micro-Cap Fund II,
L.P. proposes to provide equity security
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Dated: November 30, 2011.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 129406 and for
economic injury is 129416.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
financing to Employment Law Training,
Inc., 160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA
94111 (‘‘ELT’’).
The financing is brought within the
purview of § 107.730(a) and (d) of the
Regulations because Riverside Capital
Appreciation Fund V, L.P. and CoInvest Vehicle, both Associates of
Riverside Micro-Cap Fund II, L.P., own
more than ten percent of ELT, and
therefore this transaction is considered
a financing of an Associate requiring
prior SBA approval.
Notice is hereby given that any
interested person may submit written
comments on the transaction, within
fifteen days of the date of this
publication, to the Associate
Administrator for Investment, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416.
Jkt 226001
Riverside Micro-Cap Fund II, L.P.;
Notice Seeking Exemption Under
Section 312 of the Small Business
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest
Notice is hereby given that Riverside
Micro-Cap Fund II, L.P., 45 Rockefeller
Center, New York, NY 10111, a Federal
Licensee under the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, as amended
(‘‘the Act’’), in connection with the
financing of a small concern, has sought
an exemption under Section 312 of the
Act and Section 107.730, Financings
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of
the Small Business Administration
(‘‘SBA’’) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR
107.730). Riverside Micro-Cap Fund II,
L.P. proposes to provide equity security
financing to DrugTest Holding
Company, 12600 Northborough Drive,
Suite 300, Houston, TX 77067 (‘‘DISA’’).
The financing is brought within the
purview of § 107.730(a) and (d) of the
Regulations because Riverside Capital
Appreciation Fund V, L.P. and CoInvest Vehicle, both Associates of
Riverside Micro-Cap Fund II, L.P., own
more than ten percent of DISA, and
therefore this transaction is considered
a financing of an Associate requiring
prior SBA approval.
Notice is hereby given that any
interested person may submit written
comments on the transaction, within
fifteen days of the date of this
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
publication, to the Associate
Administrator for Investment, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416.
Dated: November 30, 2011.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2011–31548 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 7711]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Empowering Women and
Girls Through Sports
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/SU–12–14.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number: 19.415.
Key Dates
Application Deadline: February 6,
2012.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for
Empowering Women and Girls through
Sport Program as part of the
International Sports Programming
Initiative. This initiative will consist of
approximately 12 short-term U.S.-based
and overseas programs focused on using
sport as a tool for women’s
empowerment. The program envisions
approximately 115 participants from
overseas coming to the U.S., and
approximately 20 American participants
traveling overseas. Public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) may apply.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries* * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
nations* * *and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: The Office of Citizen
Exchanges welcomes proposals for twoway exchanges that directly respond to
the following objectives: (1) To use sport
as a tool to introduce foreign
participants to the United States, and
specifically to girls-focused
programming; (2) To increase the
capacity of girls’ sports programs
overseas; and (3) To use mentorships to
foster professional relationships
between women’s sports leaders and
administrators in the United States with
those overseas.
It has been shown that women’s
participation in sport can improve
physical health, foster self-esteem, and
provide opportunities for leadership
and achievement. By demonstrating the
important and growing role that sports
play in the social development of
women and girls in the United States,
these sports exchange programs will
foster women’s empowerment in
participating countries.
All foreign participants will benefit
from the effectiveness of sport in
communicating American ideals and
values despite language and other
cultural barriers. Foreign participants
will gain a deeper understanding of U.S.
society and culture through interactions
with participants from the United
States, as well as through sessions on
the history of Title IX and its
implications in the United States. The
Americans with whom they spend time
in the United States, along with
Americans who travel overseas, will
learn about the experience of their
foreign counterparts.
Sports Visitor Programs
The visitor program will introduce
participants to: The integration of sports
into the education and lives of women
and girls in the United States; the role
of sports in teaching teamwork, healthy
behaviors, and leadership skills; and to
develop the participants’ skills and
knowledge in using sport as a vehicle
for positive change in their
communities.
The primary audience will be either
youth players (14–17 years old) or
coaches who work with girls and are
committed to the development of girls’
sport programs. Program Sessions may
include some combination of the
following topics: Title IX; disability
sports; sport-specific clinics;
teambuilding; schools in the United
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
States; after school programming;
volunteerism; coaching & youth
development; women’s health,
including fitness and nutrition;
leadership activities; exposure to sports
programs specifically for girls;
recruiting participants and funding
women’s sport programs; and conflict
resolution.
ECA estimates approximately 115
visitors for 10-day programs. Most
programs will either begin or end in the
Washington, DC area. Other program
sites will be determined by ECA, in
consultation with the cooperating
agency. For more information on
budgeting, please consult the POGI.
Sport Envoy Programs
Sports Envoys will be a combination
of American sports program
administrators, coaches, and athletes
who will focus on female athletes and
coaches, as well as the development of
girls’ sports programming infrastructure.
The embassies will have a key role in
implementing the programs, but the
cooperating agency will help to develop
program materials, recruit sport program
administrators, and may arrange airfare.
Additionally, small groups of American
envoys may require an orientation
before traveling overseas. The applicant
should plan on approximately 20
participants receiving an orientation in
the Washington, DC area before heading
overseas.
Sports Mentorship Program
The Sports Mentorship component
will link approximately 20 foreign
emerging leaders in women’s sports
from ECA-selected countries, who have
at least two years of professional
experience in building sports programs
for women and girls, with female peer
mentors in the United States for an
approximately four-week mentorship
program. The program is designed to
reach beyond the exchange by serving as
the basis for an international
professional support network for
women working in sport. Participants
will also have access to the community
of alumni from previous State
Department sponsored exchange
programs.
Applicant organizations must identify
a sampling of the U.S. organizations and
individuals with whom they are
proposing to match foreign participants.
Proposals should contain letters of
commitment or support from partner
organizations for the proposed
mentorships. A description of any
previous cooperative activities with
these partner organizations must be
included in the proposal, along with
information about their mission,
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76803
activities, and accomplishments.
Applicants should clearly outline and
describe the roles and responsibilities of
all partner organizations in terms of
project logistics, management and
oversight.
By participating and working with
female athletes and administrators from
around the globe, the participants will
develop a broader world view; they will
have opportunities to connect with
women and girls across borders and
promote mutual understanding and
partnerships. They will be able to
harness the tools sport provides for
helping women and girls to live a
healthy and independent life that will
enable them to pursue educational,
career, and leadership opportunities
that otherwise may have been closed to
them.
Further details on specific program
responsibilities can be found in the
Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI), which is part of
the formal solicitation package available
from the Bureau. Interested
organizations should read the entire
Federal Register announcement for all
information prior to preparing
proposals.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/
C/SU is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond
routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/SU
activities and responsibilities for this
program are as follows:
1. Participating in the design and
direction of program activities,
including approval and input for all
program agendas and timelines;
2. Providing guidance in execution of
all project components;
3. Providing guidance on content and
speakers for workshops;
4. Assisting with SEVIS-related
issues;
5. Assisting with participant
emergencies;
6. Selecting participating countries for
programming;
7. Liaising with Public Affairs
Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State
Department;
8. Liaising with the U.S. professional
sports leagues and federations to select
Sports Envoys and help in hosting Sport
Visitor delegations.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2012.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
76804
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
Approximate Average Award:
$1,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, February 15, 2012.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
June 30, 2013.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this cooperative
agreement for two additional fiscal
years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making one award, in an
amount up to $1,000,000 to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
(b.) Technical Eligibility: All
proposals must comply with the
following or they will result in your
proposal being declared technically
ineligible and given no further
consideration in the review process.
The Office does not support proposals
limited to conferences or seminars (i.e.,
one- to fourteen day programs with
plenary sessions, main speakers, panels,
and a passive audience). It will support
conferences only when they are a small
part of a larger project in duration that
is receiving Bureau funding from this
competition.
No funding is available exclusively to
send U.S. citizens to conferences or
conference-type seminars overseas; nor
is funding available for bringing foreign
nationals to conferences or to routine
professional association meetings in the
United States.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges does
not support academic research or
faculty or student fellowships.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact Beth Fine, Office of
Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/SU, SA–
5, 3rd Floor, SportsUnited, Department
of State, Washington, DC 20522–0503,
telephone: (202) 632–6061; fax: (202)
632–6492; or email: FineEH@state.gov to
request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Beth Fine and refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/
PE/C/SU–12–14 on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
(866) 705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. All federal award recipients
must maintain current registrations in
the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) database. Recipients must
maintain accurate and up-to-date
information in the CCR until all
program and financial activity and
reporting have been completed.
Recipients must review and update the
information at least annually after the
initial registration and more frequently
if required information changes or
another award is granted. Failure to
register in the CCR will render
applicants ineligible to receive funding.
You must have nonprofit status with
the IRS at the time of application. Please
note: Effective January 7, 2009, all
applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations
Governing The J Visa.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of
the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving awards
(either a grant or cooperative agreement)
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s
compliance with’’ 22 CFR part 62.
Therefore, the Bureau expects that any
organization receiving an award under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing
the J visa program status. Therefore,
proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62.
If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et. seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from:
Office of Designation, Private Sector
Programs Division, U.S. Department of
State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA–5, 5th Floor,
2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC
20037.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76805
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation. Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
recipient organization will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
76806
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
1. Educational materials;
2. Participant travel (domestic, local,
and international transportation);
3. Orientations;
4. Cultural activities;
5. Meeting costs;
6. Food and lodging;
7. Travel and Per Diem for
Interpreters or English Language
Officers;
8. Small grants;
9. Evaluation;
10. Other justifiable expenses directly
related to supporting program activities.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February
6, 2012.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/SU–
12–14.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications.
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and (8) copies of the
application should be sent to:
Program Management Division ECA–
IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/SU–12–14,
SA–5, Floor 4, Department of State,
2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC
20037.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications.
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility
for applicant timeliness of submission or data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes for proposals submitted
via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to:
Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact
Center Phone: (800) 518–4726, Business
Hours: Monday–Friday, 7 a.m.–9 p.m.
Eastern Time, Email:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the
difference between a submission receipt
and a submission validation. Applicants
will receive a validation email from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Optional—IV.3f.3 You may also state
here any limitations on the number of
applications that an applicant may
submit and make it clear whether the
limitation is on the submitting
organization, individual program
director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards cooperative agreements resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the Program Idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Program Planning and Ability To
Achieve Objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. The agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and
flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will
meet the program’s objectives and plan.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and
debriefing sessions, and follow-on
activities).
4. Institutional Capacity/Track
Record: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program’s goals. Proposals should
demonstrate an institutional record of
successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with
all reporting requirements for past
Bureau awards (grants or cooperative
agreements) as determined by Bureau
Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients
and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
5. Program Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
Draft survey questionnaires or other
techniques plus a description of a
methodology to link outcomes to the
original program objectives are
recommended.
6. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76807
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
7. Follow-on Activities: Proposals
should provide a plan for
implementation of the small grants
program described above. That plan
should include coordination with the
appropriate post. All follow-on
activities should be tracked and
evaluated.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive a Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply to this project: A
critical component of current U.S.
government Iran policy is the support
for indigenous Iranian voices. The State
Department has made the awarding of
grants for this purpose a key component
of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has
requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate
the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571,
582, and 635(b) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18
U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive
Order 13224; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department will collect
information from grantees and subgrantees regarding the identity and
background of their key employees and
Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact Beth Fine,
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
76808
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2011 / Notices
telephone number (202) 632–6061, email
fineeh@state.gov for additional information.
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact:
Beth Fine, telephone number (202) 632–6061,
email fineeh@state.gov for additional
information.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements With
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will will be transmitted to OMB,
and be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial
reports which should include relevant
details on all programs completed that
quarter, as well as a description of
planning undertaken for programs
taking place in the following quarter.
Specific information on mentorship
hosts, follow-on grants, and other
program activities should be included.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
Optional Program Data Requirements
Award recipients will be required to
maintain specific data on program
participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the agreement.
(2) Numbers of all persons who
benefit from the award funding but do
not travel.
(3) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least one week prior to the official
opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Beth Fine, U.S.
Department of State, ECA/PE/C/SU, SA–
5, 3rd Floor, SportsUnited, Department
of State, Washington, DC 20522–0503,
telephone: (202) 632–6061; fax: (202)
632–6492; or email:
FineEH@state.govmailto:.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
SU–12–14.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: November 28, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–31392 Filed 12–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Procurement Thresholds for
Implementation of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of Determination of
Procurement Thresholds.
AGENCY:
Jean
Heilman Grier, Senior Procurement
Negotiator, Office of the United States
Trade Representative, (202) 395–9476 or
Jean_Grier@ustr.eop.gov.
SUMMARY: Executive Order 12260
requires the United States Trade
Representative to set the U.S. dollar
thresholds for application of Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), which
implements U.S. trade agreement
obligations, including those under the
World Trade Organization (WTO)
Agreement on Government
Procurement, Chapter 15 of the United
States-Australia Free Trade Agreement
(U.S.-Australia FTA), Chapter 9 of the
United States-Bahrain Free Trade
Agreement (U.S.-Bahrain FTA), Chapter
9 of the United States-Chile Free Trade
Agreement (U.S.-Chile FTA), Chapter 9
of the Dominican Republic-Central
American-United States Free Trade
Agreement (DR–CAFTA), Chapter 9 of
the United States-Morocco Free Trade
Agreement (U.S.-Morocco FTA),
Chapter 10 of the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Chapter 9 of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 236 (Thursday, December 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76802-76808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31392]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 7711]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Empowering Women and Girls Through Sports
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/SU-12-14.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates
Application Deadline: February 6, 2012.
Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open competition for
Empowering Women and Girls through Sport Program as part of the
International Sports Programming Initiative. This initiative will
consist of approximately 12 short-term U.S.-based and overseas programs
focused on using sport as a tool for women's empowerment. The program
envisions approximately 115 participants from overseas coming to the
U.S., and approximately 20 American participants traveling overseas.
Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may
apply.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries* * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational
and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of
the United States and other
[[Page 76803]]
nations* * *and thus to assist in the development of friendly,
sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the
other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the program
above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Office of Citizen Exchanges welcomes proposals for
two-way exchanges that directly respond to the following objectives:
(1) To use sport as a tool to introduce foreign participants to the
United States, and specifically to girls-focused programming; (2) To
increase the capacity of girls' sports programs overseas; and (3) To
use mentorships to foster professional relationships between women's
sports leaders and administrators in the United States with those
overseas.
It has been shown that women's participation in sport can improve
physical health, foster self-esteem, and provide opportunities for
leadership and achievement. By demonstrating the important and growing
role that sports play in the social development of women and girls in
the United States, these sports exchange programs will foster women's
empowerment in participating countries.
All foreign participants will benefit from the effectiveness of
sport in communicating American ideals and values despite language and
other cultural barriers. Foreign participants will gain a deeper
understanding of U.S. society and culture through interactions with
participants from the United States, as well as through sessions on the
history of Title IX and its implications in the United States. The
Americans with whom they spend time in the United States, along with
Americans who travel overseas, will learn about the experience of their
foreign counterparts.
Sports Visitor Programs
The visitor program will introduce participants to: The integration
of sports into the education and lives of women and girls in the United
States; the role of sports in teaching teamwork, healthy behaviors, and
leadership skills; and to develop the participants' skills and
knowledge in using sport as a vehicle for positive change in their
communities.
The primary audience will be either youth players (14-17 years old)
or coaches who work with girls and are committed to the development of
girls' sport programs. Program Sessions may include some combination of
the following topics: Title IX; disability sports; sport-specific
clinics; teambuilding; schools in the United States; after school
programming; volunteerism; coaching & youth development; women's
health, including fitness and nutrition; leadership activities;
exposure to sports programs specifically for girls; recruiting
participants and funding women's sport programs; and conflict
resolution.
ECA estimates approximately 115 visitors for 10-day programs. Most
programs will either begin or end in the Washington, DC area. Other
program sites will be determined by ECA, in consultation with the
cooperating agency. For more information on budgeting, please consult
the POGI.
Sport Envoy Programs
Sports Envoys will be a combination of American sports program
administrators, coaches, and athletes who will focus on female athletes
and coaches, as well as the development of girls' sports programming
infrastructure. The embassies will have a key role in implementing the
programs, but the cooperating agency will help to develop program
materials, recruit sport program administrators, and may arrange
airfare. Additionally, small groups of American envoys may require an
orientation before traveling overseas. The applicant should plan on
approximately 20 participants receiving an orientation in the
Washington, DC area before heading overseas.
Sports Mentorship Program
The Sports Mentorship component will link approximately 20 foreign
emerging leaders in women's sports from ECA-selected countries, who
have at least two years of professional experience in building sports
programs for women and girls, with female peer mentors in the United
States for an approximately four-week mentorship program. The program
is designed to reach beyond the exchange by serving as the basis for an
international professional support network for women working in sport.
Participants will also have access to the community of alumni from
previous State Department sponsored exchange programs.
Applicant organizations must identify a sampling of the U.S.
organizations and individuals with whom they are proposing to match
foreign participants. Proposals should contain letters of commitment or
support from partner organizations for the proposed mentorships. A
description of any previous cooperative activities with these partner
organizations must be included in the proposal, along with information
about their mission, activities, and accomplishments. Applicants should
clearly outline and describe the roles and responsibilities of all
partner organizations in terms of project logistics, management and
oversight.
By participating and working with female athletes and
administrators from around the globe, the participants will develop a
broader world view; they will have opportunities to connect with women
and girls across borders and promote mutual understanding and
partnerships. They will be able to harness the tools sport provides for
helping women and girls to live a healthy and independent life that
will enable them to pursue educational, career, and leadership
opportunities that otherwise may have been closed to them.
Further details on specific program responsibilities can be found
in the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI), which is
part of the formal solicitation package available from the Bureau.
Interested organizations should read the entire Federal Register
announcement for all information prior to preparing proposals.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/C/SU is substantially involved
in program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/SU
activities and responsibilities for this program are as follows:
1. Participating in the design and direction of program activities,
including approval and input for all program agendas and timelines;
2. Providing guidance in execution of all project components;
3. Providing guidance on content and speakers for workshops;
4. Assisting with SEVIS-related issues;
5. Assisting with participant emergencies;
6. Selecting participating countries for programming;
7. Liaising with Public Affairs Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State Department;
8. Liaising with the U.S. professional sports leagues and
federations to select Sports Envoys and help in hosting Sport Visitor
delegations.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2012.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
[[Page 76804]]
Approximate Average Award: $1,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, February 15,
2012.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: June 30, 2013.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this cooperative agreement for two additional
fiscal years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award,
in an amount up to $1,000,000 to support program and administrative
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the
following or they will result in your proposal being declared
technically ineligible and given no further consideration in the review
process.
The Office does not support proposals limited to conferences or
seminars (i.e., one- to fourteen day programs with plenary sessions,
main speakers, panels, and a passive audience). It will support
conferences only when they are a small part of a larger project in
duration that is receiving Bureau funding from this competition.
No funding is available exclusively to send U.S. citizens to
conferences or conference-type seminars overseas; nor is funding
available for bringing foreign nationals to conferences or to routine
professional association meetings in the United States.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges does not support academic research
or faculty or student fellowships.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact Beth Fine, Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/SU,
SA-5, 3rd Floor, SportsUnited, Department of State, Washington, DC
20522-0503, telephone: (202) 632-6061; fax: (202) 632-6492; or email:
FineEH@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number located at the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Beth Fine and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/SU-12-14 on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-(866)
705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. All federal award recipients must maintain current
registrations in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database.
Recipients must maintain accurate and up-to-date information in the CCR
until all program and financial activity and reporting have been
completed. Recipients must review and update the information at least
annually after the initial registration and more frequently if required
information changes or another award is granted. Failure to register in
the CCR will render applicants ineligible to receive funding.
You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
[[Page 76805]]
must submit information in one of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one- page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations Governing The J Visa.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J
visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations
receiving awards (either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this
RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor
in the conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the
sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau
expects that any organization receiving an award under this competition
will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully
comply with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as
a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et. seq.,
including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from:
Office of Designation, Private Sector Programs Division, U.S.
Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA-5, 5th Floor, 2200 C Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20037.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient
organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond
to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
[[Page 76806]]
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
1. Educational materials;
2. Participant travel (domestic, local, and international
transportation);
3. Orientations;
4. Cultural activities;
5. Meeting costs;
6. Food and lodging;
7. Travel and Per Diem for Interpreters or English Language
Officers;
8. Small grants;
9. Evaluation;
10. Other justifiable expenses directly related to supporting
program activities.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February 6, 2012.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/SU-12-14.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications.
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and (8) copies of the application should be sent to:
Program Management Division ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/SU-12-14,
SA-5, Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC
20037.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications.
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant
timeliness of submission or data errors resulting from transmission
or conversion processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
[[Page 76807]]
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to:
Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: (800) 518-4726,
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, Email:
grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation email from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
Optional--IV.3f.3 You may also state here any limitations on the
number of applications that an applicant may submit and make it clear
whether the limitation is on the submitting organization, individual
program director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the Program Idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Program Planning and Ability To Achieve Objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity. The agenda and plan should adhere
to the program overview and guidelines described above. Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and debriefing sessions, and follow-on activities).
4. Institutional Capacity/Track Record: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve
the program's goals. Proposals should demonstrate an institutional
record of successful exchange programs, including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past
Bureau awards (grants or cooperative agreements) as determined by
Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of
prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
5. Program Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. Draft survey questionnaires or other techniques plus a
description of a methodology to link outcomes to the original program
objectives are recommended.
6. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
7. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
implementation of the small grants program described above. That plan
should include coordination with the appropriate post. All follow-on
activities should be tracked and evaluated.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal
Assistance Award (FAA) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the
original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall
be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply to this project:
A critical component of current U.S. government Iran policy is the
support for indigenous Iranian voices. The State Department has made
the awarding of grants for this purpose a key component of its Iran
policy. As a condition of licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b),
531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as
amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive Order 13224; and
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6. These licensing conditions
mandate that the Department conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct
this vetting the Department will collect information from grantees and
sub-grantees regarding the identity and background of their key
employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran
complies with requirements, please contact Beth Fine,
[[Page 76808]]
telephone number (202) 632-6061, email fineeh@state.gov for
additional information.
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact:
Beth Fine, telephone number (202) 632-6061, email fineeh@state.gov
for additional information.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available
to the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial reports which should include
relevant details on all programs completed that quarter, as well as a
description of planning undertaken for programs taking place in the
following quarter. Specific information on mentorship hosts, follow-on
grants, and other program activities should be included.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Optional Program Data Requirements
Award recipients will be required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an electronically accessible
database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a
minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the agreement.
(2) Numbers of all persons who benefit from the award funding but
do not travel.
(3) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least one week prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Beth Fine, U.S.
Department of State, ECA/PE/C/SU, SA-5, 3rd Floor, SportsUnited,
Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0503, telephone: (202) 632-
6061; fax: (202) 632-6492; or email: FineEH@state.govmailto:.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/SU-12-14.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: November 28, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-31392 Filed 12-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P