Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009; Proposed Recommendations for a User Fee Program for Biosimilar and Interchangeable Biological Product Applications for Fiscal Years 2013 Through 2017; Notice of Public Meeting; Request for Comments, 76424-76429 [2011-31499]
Download as PDF
76424
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
II. References
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site addresses, but FDA is not
responsible for any subsequent changes
to the Web sites after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)
1. Blumberg, S.J., and J.V. Luke, ‘‘Wireless
Substitution: Early Release of Estimates
From the National Health Interview
Survey, July-December 2010,’’ (https://
www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm), National
Center for Health Statistics, June 2011.
2. Lee, S., J.M. Brick, E.R. Brown, et al.,
‘‘Growing Cell-Phone Population and
Noncoverage Bias in Traditional Random
Digit Dialing Telephone Health
Surveys,’’ Health Services Research, 45:
1121–1139, 2010.
3. Voigt, L.F., S.M. Schwartz, D.R. Doody, et
al., ‘‘Feasibility of Including Cellular
Telephone Numbers in Random Digit
Dialing for Epidemiologic Case-Control
Studies,’’ American Journal of
Epidemiology, 173: 118–126, 2011.
4. Yen, S.T., K.L. Jensen, and C.-T.J. Lin,
‘‘Awareness and Perceived Risk of
Pesticide and Antibiotic Residues in
Food: Socioeconomic Variations Among
U.S. Consumers,’’ Food Protection
Trends, 26: 654–661, 2006.
5. Lin, C.-T.J. and S.T. Yen, ‘‘Knowledge of
Dietary Facts Among U.S. Consumers,’’
Journal of the American Dietetic
Association, 110: 613–618, 2010.
6. American Association for Public Opinion
Research (AAPOR), ‘‘New
Considerations for Survey Researchers
When Planning and Conducting RDD
Telephone Surveys in the United States
With Respondents Reached via Cell
Phone Numbers,’’ (https://
www.aapor.org/
Cell_Phone_Task_Force_Report.htm),
2010.
7. Keeter, S., ‘‘The Impact of Cellular Phone
Noncoverage Bias on Polling in the 2004
Presidential Election,’’ Public Opinion
Quarterly, 70: 88–98, 2006.
8. Blumberg, S.J. and J.V. Luke,
‘‘Reevaluating the Need for Concern
Regarding Noncoverage Bias in Landline
Surveys,’’ American Journal of Public
Health, 99: 1806–1810, 2009.
9. Keeter, S., C. Kennedy, A. Clark, et al.,
‘‘What’s Missing From National Landline
RDD Surveys? The Impact of the
Growing Cell-Only Population,’’ Public
Opinion Quarterly, 71: 772–792, 2007.
Dated: December 2, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–31389 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0326]
Biologics Price Competition and
Innovation Act of 2009; Proposed
Recommendations for a User Fee
Program for Biosimilar and
Interchangeable Biological Product
Applications for Fiscal Years 2013
Through 2017; Notice of Public
Meeting; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
public meeting to discuss the proposed
recommendations for a user fee program
for biosimilar biological products for
fiscal years (FYs) 2013 through 2017.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on Friday, December 16, 2011, from
9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Registration to attend
the meeting must be received by
December 14, 2011. See section III.B of
this document for information on how
to register for the meeting. Submit either
electronic or written comments by
January 6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at FDA’s White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31,
Rm. 1503, Silver Spring, MD, 20993–
0002. Please note that visitors to the
White Oak Campus must enter through
Building 1.
Submit electronic comments to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
All comments should be identified with
the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
Transcripts of the meeting will be
available for review at the Division of
Dockets Management and on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
approximately 30 days after the public
meeting (see section III.C of this
document).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rokhsana Safaai-Jazi, Food and Drug
Administration, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1164,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, (301)
796–4463, Fax: (301) 847–8443, Email:
BiosimilarsUserFeeProgram@fda.
hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing a public meeting
to discuss proposed recommendations
for a user fee program for biosimilar
biological products (biosimilars user fee
program) for FYs 2013 through 2017. On
March 23, 2010, President Obama
signed into law the Affordable Care Act
(Pub. L. 111–148). The Affordable Care
Act contains a subtitle called the
Biologics Price Competition and
Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI Act) that
amends the Public Health Service Act
(PHS Act) and other statutes to create an
abbreviated approval pathway for
biological products shown to be
biosimilar to or interchangeable with an
FDA-licensed reference biological
product. (See sections 7001 through
7003 of the Affordable Care Act.)
Section 351(k) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C.
262(k)), added by the BPCI Act, allows
a company to submit an application for
licensure of a biosimilar or
interchangeable biological product.
The BPCI Act also amends section 735
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 379g) to include 351(k)
applications in the definition of ‘‘human
drug application’’ for the purposes of
the prescription drug user fee
provisions. (See section 7002(f)(3)(A) of
the Affordable Care Act.) Accordingly,
under section 736 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
379h), the fee for a biologics license
application (BLA) is currently the same
regardless of whether the application is
submitted under the new 351(k)
approval pathway or the preexisting
351(a) approval pathway.
The authority conferred by the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act’s
prescription drug user fee provisions
expires in September 2012. The BPCI
Act directs FDA to develop
recommendations for a biosimilars user
fee program for FYs 2013 through 2017.
(See section 7002(f)(1) of the Affordable
Care Act.) The BPCI Act provides that
FDA must consult with a range of
groups, including scientific and
academic experts, health care
professionals, representatives of patient
and consumer advocacy groups (public
stakeholders), and regulated industry
(industry stakeholders), in developing
the recommendations. As described in
section II of this document, FDA
consulted with public and industry
stakeholders from June 2011 through
September 2011.
The BPCI Act requires that FDA must
publish the recommendations for a
biosimilars user fee program in the
Federal Register and provide a period of
30 days for the public to provide written
comments on the recommendations.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
FDA is also required to hold a meeting
at which the public may present its
views on such recommendations. After
consideration of such public views and
comments, FDA is to revise the
recommendations as necessary and
transmit them to Congress by January
15, 2012.
This notice, the 30-day comment
period, and the public meeting will
satisfy certain of these requirements.
After the public meeting, FDA will
revise the recommendations as
necessary and present them to Congress.
(See section 7002(f)(1) of the Affordable
Care Act.) Additional information is
provided in this document to help
potential meeting participants better
understand the proposed
recommendations.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Proposed Biosimilars User Fee
Program Recommendations
In developing proposed
recommendations for a biosimilars user
fee program, FDA has conducted
discussions with regulated industry and
consulted with public stakeholders, as
required by the law. FDA initiated the
public consultation process on
November 2 and 3, 2010, by holding a
public hearing at which stakeholders
and other members of the public were
given an opportunity to present their
views on issues associated with the
implementation of the BPCI Act. (See 75
FR 61497, October 5, 2010.) 1 Among
other issues relating to the
implementation of the BPCI Act, FDA
solicited public comment on the
following questions related to a
biosimilars user fee program:
• If the existing fee structure under
the Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) were to be considered as a
model in establishing a user fee
structure for applications and
supplements for proposed biosimilar
and interchangeable biological products,
what factors and changes should FDA
take into consideration, and why?
• What factors should FDA take into
account when considering whether to
recommend that user fees for biosimilar
and interchangeable biological products
should also be used to monitor safety
after approval?
In the Federal Register of May 10,
2011 (76 FR 27062),2 FDA published a
notice requesting public input on FDA’s
proposed principles for development of
a biosimilars user fee program, FDA’s
proposed structure for a biosimilars user
fee program that would adhere to these
1 https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/201024853.pdf.
2 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-05-10/
pdf/2011-11348.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
principles, and proposed performance
goals for this program.
From June 2011 through September
2011, FDA conducted negotiations with
regulated industry, and consultation
meetings with public stakeholders,
concerning development of
recommendations for a biosimilars user
fee program. FDA posted minutes of
these meetings on its Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/
UserFees/ucm268124.htm.
The proposed biosimilars user fee
program for FYs 2013 through 2017
addresses many of the top priorities
identified by public and industry
stakeholders, and the most important
challenges identified within FDA. The
proposed biosimilars user fee program is
similar to the PDUFA program in that it
includes fees for marketing applications,
manufacturing establishments, and
products. However, there are some
differences because of the nascent state
of the biosimilars industry in the United
States. For example, there are no
currently marketed biosimilar biological
products; accordingly, the
recommended biosimilars user fee
program includes fees for products in
the development phase in order to
generate fee revenue in the near-term
and to enable sponsors to have meetings
with FDA early in the development of
biosimilar biological product
candidates.
As in all of FDA’s other medical
product user fee programs, under the
proposed biosimilars user fee program,
user fee funding would supplement
dedicated non-user fee funding to
ensure sufficient resources for the
Agency’s biosimilars review program. In
each fiscal year, in order to spend
biosimilars user fees, FDA would be
required to have available and allocate
at least $20 million, adjusted for
inflation, in non-user fee money for
biosimilars review activities.
Under the proposed biosimilars user
fee program, FDA would be authorized
to spend biosimilars user fees on
Agency activities related to the review
of submissions in connection with
biosimilar biological product
development, biosimilar biological
product applications, and supplements.
This would include activities related to
biosimilar biological product
development meetings and
investigational new drug applications
(INDs). It would also include
development of the scientific,
regulatory, and policy infrastructure
necessary for review of biosimilar
biological product applications, such as
regulation and policy development
related to the review of biosimilar
biological product applications, and
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76425
development of standards for products
subject to review and evaluation. It
would cover FDA activities at the
application stage, such as review of
advertising and labeling prior to
approval of a biosimilar biological
product application or supplement;
review of required postmarketing
studies and postmarketing studies that
have been agreed to by sponsors as a
condition of approval; the issuance of
action letters that communicate
decisions on biosimilar biological
product applications; and inspection of
biosimilar biological product
establishments and other facilities
undertaken as part of FDA’s review of
pending biosimilar biological product
applications and supplements (but not
inspections unrelated to the review of
biosimilar biological product
applications and supplements). Finally,
it would include some activities at the
post-approval stage, such as
postmarketing safety activities with
respect to biologics approved under
biosimilar biological product
applications or supplements.
A. Proposed Fees
The four types of fees under the
proposed biosimilars user fee program
are summarized in this section II.A.
1. Biosimilar Product Development Fees
FDA’s proposed biosimilars user fee
program includes initial and annual
biosimilar product development (BPD)
fees for biosimilar biological products in
development. The initial BPD fee would
be due upon the date of submission of
an IND describing an investigation that
FDA determines is intended to support
a biosimilar biological application for a
product, or within 5 days after FDA
grants a request for a ‘‘biosimilar
biological product development
meeting’’ (BPD Meeting) for a product.
(BPD Meetings are further described in
section II.B.7 of this document.)
Additionally, under the proposed
BPD program, if FDA determines that an
IND is intended to support a biosimilar
biological product application for a
product, each person that has submitted
an IND before the date of enactment of
the legislation authorizing the
biosimilars user fee program would also
be subject to the initial BPD fee. A
sponsor would be assessed only one
initial BPD fee per product. Regardless
of the number of proposed indications
for the biosimilar biological product, the
sponsor would pay one BPD fee per
product. The initial BPD fee for each of
the FYs 2013 through 2017 would be
equal to 10 percent of the fee
established for a human drug
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
76426
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
application under PDUFA for that fiscal
year.
Beginning in the next fiscal year after
a sponsor has paid the initial BPD fee
for a product, the sponsor would pay an
annual BPD fee on or before October 1
of each year, until the sponsor submits
a marketing application for the product
that is accepted for filing, or
discontinues participation in the BPD
program for the product. A sponsor that
has not submitted an IND for the
product may discontinue participation
in the BPD program by submitting a
written declaration to FDA affirming
that the sponsor has no present
intention of further developing the
product as a biosimilar biological
product. A sponsor that has submitted
an IND for the product would be able to
effectuate the discontinuation only after
withdrawing the IND as specified in 21
CFR part 312. A sponsor must
discontinue participation in the BPD
program by August 1 of the year of
discontinuation to avoid incurring the
fee that otherwise would be due on
October 1. A sponsor that maintains an
IND for the product after submitting a
marketing application for the product
that was accepted for filing would not
pay the annual BPD fee for that product.
A sponsor that has discontinued
participation in the BPD program for a
product would be required to pay a
reactivation fee in order to resume
participation in the BPD program for
that product. The reactivation fee would
be equal to twice the initial BPD fee for
that fiscal year. The reactivation fee
would be due within 5 days after FDA
grants a request for a BPD Meeting for
the product, or upon the date of
submission of an IND describing an
investigation that FDA determines is
intended to support a biosimilar
biological product application for that
product, whichever is earlier. A sponsor
that pays a reactivation fee for a product
would be required to pay the annual
BPD fee for the product beginning in the
next fiscal year.
If a sponsor has failed to pay the
initial BPD fee, annual BPD fee, or
reactivation fee as required, FDA would
not provide a BPD Meeting relating to
the biosimilar biological product for
which the fees are owed. Also, except in
extraordinary circumstances, if a
sponsor that owes BPD fees submits an
IND that FDA determines is intended to
support a biosimilar biological product
application, FDA would not consider
the sponsor’s IND to have been received
under section 505(i)(2) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
355(i)(2)). In addition, if a sponsor that
owes BPD fees has an existing IND that
FDA determines is intended to support
a biosimilar biological product
application, FDA would prohibit the
sponsor from continuing the
investigation (this action would be
referred to as ‘‘financial hold’’). Finally,
if a sponsor has failed to pay BPD fees
as required, then any biosimilar
biological product application or
supplement submitted by that sponsor
would be considered incomplete and
would not be accepted for filing until all
fees owed by the sponsor have been
paid.
2. Marketing Application Fee
FDA estimates that the cost of
reviewing an application for licensure of
a biosimilar biological product will be
comparable to the cost of reviewing an
application for licensure of a biological
product under section 351(a) of the PHS
Act. FDA therefore proposes to set the
marketing application fee for a
biosimilar biological product equal to
the fee established for a human drug
application under PDUFA, minus the
cumulative amount of any BPD fees
(including any reactivation fees) paid
for the product that is the subject of the
application. The feedback and
consultation that FDA expects to
provide to sponsors during the
biosimilar biological product
development phase is expected to
improve the efficiency of the biosimilar
biological product development process
and the quality of submitted marketing
applications. Therefore, FDA considers
the BPD phase fees, and the deduction
of paid BPD fees from the associated
marketing application fee payment, to
be a reasonable approach to shift
resources forward to the point in
development where FDA review is
currently being sought by sponsors.
3. Establishment Fees and Product Fees
Because the complexity and level of
effort required for FDA oversight of
manufacturing and postmarketing safety
issues for products licensed under
section 351(k) of the PHS Act is
expected to be comparable to that
required for products licensed under
section 351(a), FDA proposes setting
biosimilar biological product
establishment and product fees equal to
the establishment and product fees
under PDUFA for any fiscal year. FDA
anticipates a modest level of funding
from these sources initially because
only biosimilar biological products that
are approved for marketing would be
subject to these fees.
B. Proposed Performance Goals and
Procedures
The full description of the proposed
performance goals and procedures for
the biosimilars user fee program can be
found in the draft biosimilars user fee
commitment letter (draft commitment
letter) posted on FDA’s Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/
DevelopmentApprovalProcess/
HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/
ApprovalApplications/
TherapeuticBiologicApplications/
Biosimilars/UCM281991.pdf. The
proposed performance goals and
procedures are described in this section
II.B with reference to the section of the
draft commitment letter where more
detailed information can be found.
1. Review Performance Goals
The proposed biosimilars review
program would include review
performance goals for biosimilar
biological product application
submissions and resubmissions,
supplements with clinical data, and
original manufacturing supplements.
Further information concerning these
review performance goals can be found
in section I of the draft commitment
letter. The review performance goals are
summarized in tables 1 and 2 of this
document.:
TABLE 1—PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR ORIGINAL AND RESUBMITTED APPLICATIONS AND SUPPLEMENTS
Performance goal
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission cohort
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
Within 10 Months of the Receipt Date
Original Biosimilar Biological Product Application Submissions .................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
70%
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70%
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
80%
07DEN1
85%
90%
76427
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 1—PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR ORIGINAL AND RESUBMITTED APPLICATIONS AND SUPPLEMENTS—Continued
Performance goal
Submission cohort
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
Within 6 Months of the Receipt Date
Resubmitted Original Biosimilar Biological Product Applications ..............................................................................
70%
70%
80%
85%
90%
TABLE 2—PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR ORIGINAL AND RESUBMITTED SUPPLEMENTS
Submission
Performance goal
Original Supplements with Clinical Data ....................................................................................
Resubmitted Supplements with Clinical Data ............................................................................
Manufacturing Supplements .......................................................................................................
90% Within 10 Months of the Receipt Date.
90% Within 6 Months of the Receipt Date.
90% Within 6 Months of the Receipt Date.
the signatory authority level, FDA’s goal
would be to respond to 90 percent of
decision appeals within 30 calendar
days of FDA’s receipt of the written
appeal, provided that certain conditions
are met. Section IV of the draft
commitment letter contains further
information concerning this
performance goal.
3. Review of Proprietary Names To
Reduce Medication Errors
The proposed biosimilars review
program includes proprietary name
review performance goals. For
proprietary names submitted during the
biosimilar biological product
development phase, FDA’s goal would
be to review 90 percent within 180 days
of receipt. For proprietary names
submitted with the biosimilar biological
product application, FDA’s goal would
be to review 90 percent within 90 days
of receipt. Section III of the draft
commitment letter contains further
information concerning these
performance goals.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. First Cycle Performance Goals
The proposed biosimilars review
program includes first cycle review
performance goals for original
biosimilar biological product
applications and supplements with
clinical data. For 90 percent of
applications and supplements with
clinical data, FDA’s goal would be to
inform the applicant of any substantive
review issues identified during the
initial filing review within 74 calendar
days of the receipt date. In addition, for
90 percent of applications and
supplements with clinical data, FDA’s
goal would be to inform the applicant of
the planned review timeline for the
application within 74 calendar days of
the receipt date. Section II of the draft
commitment letter contains further
information concerning these
performance goals.
The proposed biosimilars review
program includes procedures and
performance goals for special protocol
assessments. Under the proposed
program, provided that certain
conditions are met, upon specific
request by a sponsor, the Agency would
evaluate certain protocols and related
issues to assess whether the design is
adequate to meet scientific and
regulatory requirements identified by
the sponsor. FDA’s goal would be to
provide a written response to the
sponsor that includes a succinct
assessment of the protocol and answers
to the questions posed by the sponsor.
For FYs 2013 and 2014, FDA’s goal
would be to respond to 70 percent of the
requests within 45 days of FDA’s receipt
of the protocol and specific questions.
For FY 2015, FDA’s goal would be to
respond to 80 percent of the requests
within the 45-day time frame; for FY
2016, 85 percent, and for FY 2017, 90
percent. Section VI of the draft
commitment letter contains further
4. Major Dispute Resolution
The proposed biosimilars review
program includes a major dispute
resolution performance goal. For
procedural or scientific matters
involving the review of biosimilar
biological product applications and
supplements that cannot be resolved at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
5. Clinical Holds
The proposed biosimilars review
program includes a clinical hold
performance goal. FDA’s goal would be
to respond to 90 percent of sponsors’
complete responses to a clinical hold
within 30 days of FDA’s receipt of the
complete response submission. Section
V of the draft commitment letter
contains further information concerning
this performance goal.
6. Special Protocol Assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information concerning this
performance goal.
7. Meeting Management Goals
FDA proposes performance goals and
procedures regarding meetings related
to sponsors’ biosimilar biological
product development programs. Further
information concerning these goals can
be found in section VII of the draft
commitment letter. These goals and
procedures would apply to Biosimilar
Initial Advisory Meetings and BPD
Meetings. Under the proposed program,
a Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meeting is
an initial assessment limited to a
general discussion regarding whether
licensure under section 351(k) of the
PHS Act may be feasible for a particular
product, and, if so, general advice on
the expected content of the
development program. It does not
include any meeting that involves
substantive review of summary data or
full study reports. A BPD Meeting is any
meeting, other than a Biosimilar Initial
Advisory Meeting, regarding the content
of a development program, including a
proposed design for, or data from, a
study intended to support a biosimilar
biological product application. The four
types of BPD Meetings are as follows:
• A BPD Type 1 Meeting is a meeting
that is necessary for an otherwise stalled
drug development program to proceed
(e.g., meeting to discuss clinical holds,
dispute resolution meeting), a special
protocol assessment meeting, or a
meeting to address an important safety
issue.
• A BPD Type 2 Meeting is a meeting
to discuss a specific issue (e.g.,
proposed study design or endpoints) or
questions where FDA will provide
targeted advice regarding an ongoing
biosimilar biological product
development program. BPD Type 2
Meetings include substantive review of
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
76428
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
summary data, but does not include
review of full study reports.
• A BPD Type 3 Meeting is an indepth data review and advice meeting
regarding an ongoing biosimilar
biological product development
program. This type of meeting includes
substantive review of full study reports,
FDA advice regarding the similarity
between the proposed biosimilar
biological product and the reference
product, and FDA advice regarding
additional studies, including design and
analysis.
• A BPD Type 4 Meeting is a meeting
to discuss the format and content of a
biosimilar biological product
application or supplement submitted
under section 351(k) of the PHS Act.
The proposed review program
includes performance goals for
responses to meeting requests.
Specifically, for 90 percent of BPD Type
1 Meeting requests, FDA’s goal would
be to notify the requester in writing of
the date, time, place, and format for the
meeting, as well as expected Center
participants, within 14 calendar days of
FDA’s receipt of the request and
meeting package. For 90 percent of BPD
Type 2, 3, and 4 Meeting requests and
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meeting
requests, FDA’s goal would be to notify
the requester in writing of the date,
time, place, and format for the meeting,
as well as expected Center participants,
within 21 calendar days of FDA’s
receipt of the request and meeting
package.
The proposed review program also
includes performance goals for
scheduling meetings within target time
frames. The target time frames for each
of the five meeting types are as follows:
TABLE 3—TARGET TIME FRAMES FOR MEETING TYPES
Meeting type
Timeframe after receipt of meeting request and meeting package
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meeting ......................
BPD Type 1 Meeting ..........................................
BPD Type 2 Meeting ..........................................
BPD Type 3 Meeting ..........................................
BPD Type 4 Meeting ..........................................
The performance goals for each
meeting type are as follows:
• For FY 2013, 70 percent of
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings
are held within the target time frame.
• For FY 2014, 70 percent of
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings
are held within the target time frame.
• For FY 2015, 80 percent of
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings
are held within the target time frame.
• For FY 2016, 85 percent of
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings
are held within the target time frame.
• For FY 2017, 90 percent of
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings
are held within the target time frame.
Under the proposed program, in order
for a meeting to qualify for these
performance goals, certain conditions
would need to be met. First, the meeting
request and meeting package must
include the information outlined in the
draft commitment letter. Second, FDA
must concur that the meeting will serve
a useful purpose (i.e., it is not premature
or clearly unnecessary). If FDA
determines that a different type of
meeting is more appropriate, it may
grant a meeting of a different type than
requested, which may require the
payment of a BPD fee before the meeting
will be provided. If a BPD fee is
required and the sponsor does not pay
the fee within the required time frame,
the meeting will be cancelled. If the
sponsor pays the BPD fee after the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Meeting
Meeting
Meeting
Meeting
Meeting
should
should
should
should
should
occur
occur
occur
occur
occur
within
within
within
within
within
90 calendar days of FDA receipt.
30 calendar days of FDA receipt.
75 calendar days of FDA receipt.
120 calendar days of FDA receipt.
60 calendar days of FDA receipt.
meeting has been cancelled because of
non-payment, the target time frame for
the meeting will be calculated from the
date on which FDA received the
payment, not the date on which the
sponsor originally submitted the
meeting request.
FDA’s goal would be to provide
meeting minutes within 30 days of the
date of the meeting for 90 percent of
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings.
Finally, FDA’s goal would be to develop
and publish for comment draft guidance
on Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings
and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings
by the end of the second quarter of FY
2014.
III. What information should you know
about the public meeting?
A. When and where will the public
meeting occur? What format will FDA
use?
We will convene a public meeting to
hear the public’s views on the proposed
recommendations for a biosimilars user
fee program. We will conduct the
meeting on December 16, 2011, at FDA’s
White Oak Campus (see ADDRESSES).
The meeting will include a presentation
by FDA and a series of panels
representing different stakeholder
groups identified in the statute (such as
patient advocacy groups, consumer
advocacy groups, health professionals,
and regulated industry) to provide input
on the proposed recommendations. We
will also provide an opportunity for
other organizations and individuals to
make presentations at the meeting or to
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submit written comments to the docket
before the meeting.
B. How do you register for the public
meeting or submit comments?
If you wish to attend this meeting,
please register by email at: Biosimilars
UserFeeProgram@fda.hhs.gov by
December 14, 2011. Your email should
contain complete contact information
for each attendee, including: Name title,
affiliation, address, email, address, and
phone number. Registration is free and
will be on a first-come, first-served
basis. Early registration is recommended
because seating is limited. FDA may
limit the number of participants from
each organization based on space
limitations. Registrants will receive
confirmation once they have been
accepted. On-site registration on the day
of the meeting will be based on space
availability. We will try to accommodate
all persons who wish to make a
presentation. If you need special
accommodations because of disability,
please notify FDA by email to
BiosimilarsUserFeeProgram@fda.
hhs.gov or Rokhsana Safaai-Jazi (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least
4 days before the meeting.
In addition, interested persons may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments
regarding this document. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
It is no longer necessary to send two
copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Notices
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. To ensure
consideration, all comments must be
received by January 6, 2012.
C. Will meeting transcripts be available?
As soon as a transcript is available, it
will be accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov and https://
www.fda.gov. It may be viewed at the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). A transcript will also be
made available in either hard copy or on
CD–ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written
requests are to be sent to Division of
Freedom of Information (ELEM–1029),
Food and Drug Administration, 12420
Parklawn Dr., Element Bldg., Rockville,
MD 20857.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Additional Information on the BPCI
Act
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of
Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
The following sources of information
on FDA’s Web site may serve as useful
information:
• The Federal Register document that
announced the November 2010 public
hearing and requested public comments
is available at https://edocket.access.gpo.
gov/2010/pdf/2010-24853.pdf. (FDA has
verified the Web site address, but FDA
is not responsible for any subsequent
changes to the Web site after this
document publishes in the Federal
Register.)
• Comments submitted in response to
the November 2010 public hearing
document can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov using Docket No.
FDA–2010–N–0477.
• The Federal Register notice
document that requested notification of
stakeholder intention to participate in
consultation meetings in December 2010
is available at https://edocket.
access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-30713.
pdf.
• The Federal Register notice that
requested input on the comments
relating to the development of a user fee
program for biosimilar and
interchangeable biological product
applications in May 2010 is available at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-201105-10/pdf/2011-11348.pdf. Additional
information regarding implementation
of the BPCI Act is available at https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
UCM215031.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
Conflict: Neurodegeneration, Signaling and
Plasticity.
Date: December 13–15, 2011.
Time: 12:15 p.m. to 12:15 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person: Joanne T Fujii, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4184,
MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1178, fujiij@csr.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: December 5, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory
Committee; Vacancies
[FR Doc. 2011–31499 Filed 12–5–11; 4:15 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Dated: November 30, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–31391 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1103]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Request for applications.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76429
The Coast Guard seeks
applications for membership on the
Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory
Committee (MERPAC). This Committee
advises the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security on matters related
to personnel in the U.S. merchant
marine, including but not limited to
training, qualifications, certification,
documentation, and fitness standards.
DATES: Applicants should submit a
cover letter and resume in time to reach
the Alternate Designated Federal Officer
(ADFO) on or before February 6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Applicants should send
their cover letter and resume to the
following address: Commandant (CG–
5221), Attn MERPAC, U.S. Coast Guard,
2100 2nd St. SW., Stop 7126,
Washington DC 20593–7126; or by
calling (202) 372–1408; or by faxing
(202) 372–1926; or by emailing to
rogers.w.henderson@uscg.mil. This
notice is available in our online docket,
USCG–2011–1103, at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rogers W. Henderson, ADFO of
MERPAC; telephone (202) 372–1408 or
email at rogers.w.henderson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MERPAC
is a Federal advisory committee
established under the authority of
section 871 of The Homeland Security
Act of 2002, Title 6, United States Code,
section 451. This committee is
established in accordance with and
operates under the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) (Title 5, United States Code,
Appendix). MERPAC advises the
Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security on matters relating
to personnel in the U.S. merchant
marine, including but not limited to
training, qualifications, certification,
documentation, and fitness standards.
The Committee will advise, consult
with, and make recommendations
reflecting its independent judgment to
the Secretary.
MERPAC is expected to meet
approximately twice a year as called for
by its charter, once at or near Coast
Guard Headquarters, Washington, DC,
and once elsewhere in the country. It
may also meet for extraordinary
purposes. Its subcommittees and
working groups may also meet to
consider specific tasks as required.
We will consider applications for six
positions that expire or become vacant
on June 1, 2012. To be eligible, you
should have experience in the following
areas of expertise: One member for
marine educators representing the
viewpoint of State Maritime Academies;
one member for marine educators
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76424-76429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31499]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0326]
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009; Proposed
Recommendations for a User Fee Program for Biosimilar and
Interchangeable Biological Product Applications for Fiscal Years 2013
Through 2017; Notice of Public Meeting; Request for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
meeting to discuss the proposed recommendations for a user fee program
for biosimilar biological products for fiscal years (FYs) 2013 through
2017.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on Friday, December 16, 2011,
from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Registration to attend the meeting must be
received by December 14, 2011. See section III.B of this document for
information on how to register for the meeting. Submit either
electronic or written comments by January 6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at FDA's White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 1503, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-
0002. Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this document.
Transcripts of the meeting will be available for review at the
Division of Dockets Management and on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov approximately 30 days after the public meeting (see
section III.C of this document).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rokhsana Safaai-Jazi, Food and Drug
Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1164, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, (301)
796-4463, Fax: (301) 847-8443, Email:
BiosimilarsUserFeeProgram@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing a public meeting to discuss proposed
recommendations for a user fee program for biosimilar biological
products (biosimilars user fee program) for FYs 2013 through 2017. On
March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act
(Pub. L. 111-148). The Affordable Care Act contains a subtitle called
the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI Act)
that amends the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) and other statutes
to create an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown
to be biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference
biological product. (See sections 7001 through 7003 of the Affordable
Care Act.) Section 351(k) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 262(k)), added by
the BPCI Act, allows a company to submit an application for licensure
of a biosimilar or interchangeable biological product.
The BPCI Act also amends section 735 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379g) to include 351(k) applications in the
definition of ``human drug application'' for the purposes of the
prescription drug user fee provisions. (See section 7002(f)(3)(A) of
the Affordable Care Act.) Accordingly, under section 736 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379h), the fee for a biologics
license application (BLA) is currently the same regardless of whether
the application is submitted under the new 351(k) approval pathway or
the preexisting 351(a) approval pathway.
The authority conferred by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act's prescription drug user fee provisions expires in September 2012.
The BPCI Act directs FDA to develop recommendations for a biosimilars
user fee program for FYs 2013 through 2017. (See section 7002(f)(1) of
the Affordable Care Act.) The BPCI Act provides that FDA must consult
with a range of groups, including scientific and academic experts,
health care professionals, representatives of patient and consumer
advocacy groups (public stakeholders), and regulated industry (industry
stakeholders), in developing the recommendations. As described in
section II of this document, FDA consulted with public and industry
stakeholders from June 2011 through September 2011.
The BPCI Act requires that FDA must publish the recommendations for
a biosimilars user fee program in the Federal Register and provide a
period of 30 days for the public to provide written comments on the
recommendations.
[[Page 76425]]
FDA is also required to hold a meeting at which the public may present
its views on such recommendations. After consideration of such public
views and comments, FDA is to revise the recommendations as necessary
and transmit them to Congress by January 15, 2012.
This notice, the 30-day comment period, and the public meeting will
satisfy certain of these requirements. After the public meeting, FDA
will revise the recommendations as necessary and present them to
Congress. (See section 7002(f)(1) of the Affordable Care Act.)
Additional information is provided in this document to help potential
meeting participants better understand the proposed recommendations.
II. Proposed Biosimilars User Fee Program Recommendations
In developing proposed recommendations for a biosimilars user fee
program, FDA has conducted discussions with regulated industry and
consulted with public stakeholders, as required by the law. FDA
initiated the public consultation process on November 2 and 3, 2010, by
holding a public hearing at which stakeholders and other members of the
public were given an opportunity to present their views on issues
associated with the implementation of the BPCI Act. (See 75 FR 61497,
October 5, 2010.) \1\ Among other issues relating to the implementation
of the BPCI Act, FDA solicited public comment on the following
questions related to a biosimilars user fee program:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-24853.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the existing fee structure under the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act (PDUFA) were to be considered as a model in establishing a
user fee structure for applications and supplements for proposed
biosimilar and interchangeable biological products, what factors and
changes should FDA take into consideration, and why?
What factors should FDA take into account when considering
whether to recommend that user fees for biosimilar and interchangeable
biological products should also be used to monitor safety after
approval?
In the Federal Register of May 10, 2011 (76 FR 27062),\2\ FDA
published a notice requesting public input on FDA's proposed principles
for development of a biosimilars user fee program, FDA's proposed
structure for a biosimilars user fee program that would adhere to these
principles, and proposed performance goals for this program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-05-10/pdf/2011-11348.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From June 2011 through September 2011, FDA conducted negotiations
with regulated industry, and consultation meetings with public
stakeholders, concerning development of recommendations for a
biosimilars user fee program. FDA posted minutes of these meetings on
its Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/ucm268124.htm.
The proposed biosimilars user fee program for FYs 2013 through 2017
addresses many of the top priorities identified by public and industry
stakeholders, and the most important challenges identified within FDA.
The proposed biosimilars user fee program is similar to the PDUFA
program in that it includes fees for marketing applications,
manufacturing establishments, and products. However, there are some
differences because of the nascent state of the biosimilars industry in
the United States. For example, there are no currently marketed
biosimilar biological products; accordingly, the recommended
biosimilars user fee program includes fees for products in the
development phase in order to generate fee revenue in the near-term and
to enable sponsors to have meetings with FDA early in the development
of biosimilar biological product candidates.
As in all of FDA's other medical product user fee programs, under
the proposed biosimilars user fee program, user fee funding would
supplement dedicated non-user fee funding to ensure sufficient
resources for the Agency's biosimilars review program. In each fiscal
year, in order to spend biosimilars user fees, FDA would be required to
have available and allocate at least $20 million, adjusted for
inflation, in non-user fee money for biosimilars review activities.
Under the proposed biosimilars user fee program, FDA would be
authorized to spend biosimilars user fees on Agency activities related
to the review of submissions in connection with biosimilar biological
product development, biosimilar biological product applications, and
supplements. This would include activities related to biosimilar
biological product development meetings and investigational new drug
applications (INDs). It would also include development of the
scientific, regulatory, and policy infrastructure necessary for review
of biosimilar biological product applications, such as regulation and
policy development related to the review of biosimilar biological
product applications, and development of standards for products subject
to review and evaluation. It would cover FDA activities at the
application stage, such as review of advertising and labeling prior to
approval of a biosimilar biological product application or supplement;
review of required postmarketing studies and postmarketing studies that
have been agreed to by sponsors as a condition of approval; the
issuance of action letters that communicate decisions on biosimilar
biological product applications; and inspection of biosimilar
biological product establishments and other facilities undertaken as
part of FDA's review of pending biosimilar biological product
applications and supplements (but not inspections unrelated to the
review of biosimilar biological product applications and supplements).
Finally, it would include some activities at the post-approval stage,
such as postmarketing safety activities with respect to biologics
approved under biosimilar biological product applications or
supplements.
A. Proposed Fees
The four types of fees under the proposed biosimilars user fee
program are summarized in this section II.A.
1. Biosimilar Product Development Fees
FDA's proposed biosimilars user fee program includes initial and
annual biosimilar product development (BPD) fees for biosimilar
biological products in development. The initial BPD fee would be due
upon the date of submission of an IND describing an investigation that
FDA determines is intended to support a biosimilar biological
application for a product, or within 5 days after FDA grants a request
for a ``biosimilar biological product development meeting'' (BPD
Meeting) for a product. (BPD Meetings are further described in section
II.B.7 of this document.)
Additionally, under the proposed BPD program, if FDA determines
that an IND is intended to support a biosimilar biological product
application for a product, each person that has submitted an IND before
the date of enactment of the legislation authorizing the biosimilars
user fee program would also be subject to the initial BPD fee. A
sponsor would be assessed only one initial BPD fee per product.
Regardless of the number of proposed indications for the biosimilar
biological product, the sponsor would pay one BPD fee per product. The
initial BPD fee for each of the FYs 2013 through 2017 would be equal to
10 percent of the fee established for a human drug
[[Page 76426]]
application under PDUFA for that fiscal year.
Beginning in the next fiscal year after a sponsor has paid the
initial BPD fee for a product, the sponsor would pay an annual BPD fee
on or before October 1 of each year, until the sponsor submits a
marketing application for the product that is accepted for filing, or
discontinues participation in the BPD program for the product. A
sponsor that has not submitted an IND for the product may discontinue
participation in the BPD program by submitting a written declaration to
FDA affirming that the sponsor has no present intention of further
developing the product as a biosimilar biological product. A sponsor
that has submitted an IND for the product would be able to effectuate
the discontinuation only after withdrawing the IND as specified in 21
CFR part 312. A sponsor must discontinue participation in the BPD
program by August 1 of the year of discontinuation to avoid incurring
the fee that otherwise would be due on October 1. A sponsor that
maintains an IND for the product after submitting a marketing
application for the product that was accepted for filing would not pay
the annual BPD fee for that product.
A sponsor that has discontinued participation in the BPD program
for a product would be required to pay a reactivation fee in order to
resume participation in the BPD program for that product. The
reactivation fee would be equal to twice the initial BPD fee for that
fiscal year. The reactivation fee would be due within 5 days after FDA
grants a request for a BPD Meeting for the product, or upon the date of
submission of an IND describing an investigation that FDA determines is
intended to support a biosimilar biological product application for
that product, whichever is earlier. A sponsor that pays a reactivation
fee for a product would be required to pay the annual BPD fee for the
product beginning in the next fiscal year.
If a sponsor has failed to pay the initial BPD fee, annual BPD fee,
or reactivation fee as required, FDA would not provide a BPD Meeting
relating to the biosimilar biological product for which the fees are
owed. Also, except in extraordinary circumstances, if a sponsor that
owes BPD fees submits an IND that FDA determines is intended to support
a biosimilar biological product application, FDA would not consider the
sponsor's IND to have been received under section 505(i)(2) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)(2)). In
addition, if a sponsor that owes BPD fees has an existing IND that FDA
determines is intended to support a biosimilar biological product
application, FDA would prohibit the sponsor from continuing the
investigation (this action would be referred to as ``financial hold'').
Finally, if a sponsor has failed to pay BPD fees as required, then any
biosimilar biological product application or supplement submitted by
that sponsor would be considered incomplete and would not be accepted
for filing until all fees owed by the sponsor have been paid.
2. Marketing Application Fee
FDA estimates that the cost of reviewing an application for
licensure of a biosimilar biological product will be comparable to the
cost of reviewing an application for licensure of a biological product
under section 351(a) of the PHS Act. FDA therefore proposes to set the
marketing application fee for a biosimilar biological product equal to
the fee established for a human drug application under PDUFA, minus the
cumulative amount of any BPD fees (including any reactivation fees)
paid for the product that is the subject of the application. The
feedback and consultation that FDA expects to provide to sponsors
during the biosimilar biological product development phase is expected
to improve the efficiency of the biosimilar biological product
development process and the quality of submitted marketing
applications. Therefore, FDA considers the BPD phase fees, and the
deduction of paid BPD fees from the associated marketing application
fee payment, to be a reasonable approach to shift resources forward to
the point in development where FDA review is currently being sought by
sponsors.
3. Establishment Fees and Product Fees
Because the complexity and level of effort required for FDA
oversight of manufacturing and postmarketing safety issues for products
licensed under section 351(k) of the PHS Act is expected to be
comparable to that required for products licensed under section 351(a),
FDA proposes setting biosimilar biological product establishment and
product fees equal to the establishment and product fees under PDUFA
for any fiscal year. FDA anticipates a modest level of funding from
these sources initially because only biosimilar biological products
that are approved for marketing would be subject to these fees.
B. Proposed Performance Goals and Procedures
The full description of the proposed performance goals and
procedures for the biosimilars user fee program can be found in the
draft biosimilars user fee commitment letter (draft commitment letter)
posted on FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/UCM281991.pdf. The proposed performance goals and procedures are
described in this section II.B with reference to the section of the
draft commitment letter where more detailed information can be found.
1. Review Performance Goals
The proposed biosimilars review program would include review
performance goals for biosimilar biological product application
submissions and resubmissions, supplements with clinical data, and
original manufacturing supplements. Further information concerning
these review performance goals can be found in section I of the draft
commitment letter. The review performance goals are summarized in
tables 1 and 2 of this document.:
Table 1--Performance Goals for Original and Resubmitted Applications and Supplements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance goal
Submission cohort -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Within 10 Months of the Receipt Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Biosimilar Biological 70% 70% 80% 85% 90%
Product Application Submissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 76427]]
Within 6 Months of the Receipt Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resubmitted Original Biosimilar 70% 70% 80% 85% 90%
Biological Product Applications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Performance Goals for Original and Resubmitted Supplements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission Performance goal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Supplements with Clinical Data 90% Within 10 Months of the Receipt Date.
Resubmitted Supplements with Clinical 90% Within 6 Months of the Receipt Date.
Data.
Manufacturing Supplements.............. 90% Within 6 Months of the Receipt Date.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. First Cycle Performance Goals
The proposed biosimilars review program includes first cycle review
performance goals for original biosimilar biological product
applications and supplements with clinical data. For 90 percent of
applications and supplements with clinical data, FDA's goal would be to
inform the applicant of any substantive review issues identified during
the initial filing review within 74 calendar days of the receipt date.
In addition, for 90 percent of applications and supplements with
clinical data, FDA's goal would be to inform the applicant of the
planned review timeline for the application within 74 calendar days of
the receipt date. Section II of the draft commitment letter contains
further information concerning these performance goals.
3. Review of Proprietary Names To Reduce Medication Errors
The proposed biosimilars review program includes proprietary name
review performance goals. For proprietary names submitted during the
biosimilar biological product development phase, FDA's goal would be to
review 90 percent within 180 days of receipt. For proprietary names
submitted with the biosimilar biological product application, FDA's
goal would be to review 90 percent within 90 days of receipt. Section
III of the draft commitment letter contains further information
concerning these performance goals.
4. Major Dispute Resolution
The proposed biosimilars review program includes a major dispute
resolution performance goal. For procedural or scientific matters
involving the review of biosimilar biological product applications and
supplements that cannot be resolved at the signatory authority level,
FDA's goal would be to respond to 90 percent of decision appeals within
30 calendar days of FDA's receipt of the written appeal, provided that
certain conditions are met. Section IV of the draft commitment letter
contains further information concerning this performance goal.
5. Clinical Holds
The proposed biosimilars review program includes a clinical hold
performance goal. FDA's goal would be to respond to 90 percent of
sponsors' complete responses to a clinical hold within 30 days of FDA's
receipt of the complete response submission. Section V of the draft
commitment letter contains further information concerning this
performance goal.
6. Special Protocol Assessment
The proposed biosimilars review program includes procedures and
performance goals for special protocol assessments. Under the proposed
program, provided that certain conditions are met, upon specific
request by a sponsor, the Agency would evaluate certain protocols and
related issues to assess whether the design is adequate to meet
scientific and regulatory requirements identified by the sponsor. FDA's
goal would be to provide a written response to the sponsor that
includes a succinct assessment of the protocol and answers to the
questions posed by the sponsor. For FYs 2013 and 2014, FDA's goal would
be to respond to 70 percent of the requests within 45 days of FDA's
receipt of the protocol and specific questions. For FY 2015, FDA's goal
would be to respond to 80 percent of the requests within the 45-day
time frame; for FY 2016, 85 percent, and for FY 2017, 90 percent.
Section VI of the draft commitment letter contains further information
concerning this performance goal.
7. Meeting Management Goals
FDA proposes performance goals and procedures regarding meetings
related to sponsors' biosimilar biological product development
programs. Further information concerning these goals can be found in
section VII of the draft commitment letter. These goals and procedures
would apply to Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings and BPD Meetings.
Under the proposed program, a Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meeting is an
initial assessment limited to a general discussion regarding whether
licensure under section 351(k) of the PHS Act may be feasible for a
particular product, and, if so, general advice on the expected content
of the development program. It does not include any meeting that
involves substantive review of summary data or full study reports. A
BPD Meeting is any meeting, other than a Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meeting, regarding the content of a development program, including a
proposed design for, or data from, a study intended to support a
biosimilar biological product application. The four types of BPD
Meetings are as follows:
A BPD Type 1 Meeting is a meeting that is necessary for an
otherwise stalled drug development program to proceed (e.g., meeting to
discuss clinical holds, dispute resolution meeting), a special protocol
assessment meeting, or a meeting to address an important safety issue.
A BPD Type 2 Meeting is a meeting to discuss a specific
issue (e.g., proposed study design or endpoints) or questions where FDA
will provide targeted advice regarding an ongoing biosimilar biological
product development program. BPD Type 2 Meetings include substantive
review of
[[Page 76428]]
summary data, but does not include review of full study reports.
A BPD Type 3 Meeting is an in-depth data review and advice
meeting regarding an ongoing biosimilar biological product development
program. This type of meeting includes substantive review of full study
reports, FDA advice regarding the similarity between the proposed
biosimilar biological product and the reference product, and FDA advice
regarding additional studies, including design and analysis.
A BPD Type 4 Meeting is a meeting to discuss the format
and content of a biosimilar biological product application or
supplement submitted under section 351(k) of the PHS Act.
The proposed review program includes performance goals for
responses to meeting requests. Specifically, for 90 percent of BPD Type
1 Meeting requests, FDA's goal would be to notify the requester in
writing of the date, time, place, and format for the meeting, as well
as expected Center participants, within 14 calendar days of FDA's
receipt of the request and meeting package. For 90 percent of BPD Type
2, 3, and 4 Meeting requests and Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meeting
requests, FDA's goal would be to notify the requester in writing of the
date, time, place, and format for the meeting, as well as expected
Center participants, within 21 calendar days of FDA's receipt of the
request and meeting package.
The proposed review program also includes performance goals for
scheduling meetings within target time frames. The target time frames
for each of the five meeting types are as follows:
Table 3--Target Time Frames for Meeting Types
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timeframe after receipt of meeting
Meeting type request and meeting package
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meeting should occur within 90 calendar
Meeting. days of FDA receipt.
BPD Type 1 Meeting........... Meeting should occur within 30 calendar
days of FDA receipt.
BPD Type 2 Meeting........... Meeting should occur within 75 calendar
days of FDA receipt.
BPD Type 3 Meeting........... Meeting should occur within 120 calendar
days of FDA receipt.
BPD Type 4 Meeting........... Meeting should occur within 60 calendar
days of FDA receipt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The performance goals for each meeting type are as follows:
For FY 2013, 70 percent of Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings are held within the
target time frame.
For FY 2014, 70 percent of Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings are held within the
target time frame.
For FY 2015, 80 percent of Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings are held within the
target time frame.
For FY 2016, 85 percent of Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings are held within the
target time frame.
For FY 2017, 90 percent of Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings are held within the
target time frame.
Under the proposed program, in order for a meeting to qualify for
these performance goals, certain conditions would need to be met.
First, the meeting request and meeting package must include the
information outlined in the draft commitment letter. Second, FDA must
concur that the meeting will serve a useful purpose (i.e., it is not
premature or clearly unnecessary). If FDA determines that a different
type of meeting is more appropriate, it may grant a meeting of a
different type than requested, which may require the payment of a BPD
fee before the meeting will be provided. If a BPD fee is required and
the sponsor does not pay the fee within the required time frame, the
meeting will be cancelled. If the sponsor pays the BPD fee after the
meeting has been cancelled because of non-payment, the target time
frame for the meeting will be calculated from the date on which FDA
received the payment, not the date on which the sponsor originally
submitted the meeting request.
FDA's goal would be to provide meeting minutes within 30 days of
the date of the meeting for 90 percent of Biosimilar Initial Advisory
Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4 Meetings. Finally, FDA's goal
would be to develop and publish for comment draft guidance on
Biosimilar Initial Advisory Meetings and BPD Type 1, 2, 3, and 4
Meetings by the end of the second quarter of FY 2014.
III. What information should you know about the public meeting?
A. When and where will the public meeting occur? What format will FDA
use?
We will convene a public meeting to hear the public's views on the
proposed recommendations for a biosimilars user fee program. We will
conduct the meeting on December 16, 2011, at FDA's White Oak Campus
(see ADDRESSES). The meeting will include a presentation by FDA and a
series of panels representing different stakeholder groups identified
in the statute (such as patient advocacy groups, consumer advocacy
groups, health professionals, and regulated industry) to provide input
on the proposed recommendations. We will also provide an opportunity
for other organizations and individuals to make presentations at the
meeting or to submit written comments to the docket before the meeting.
B. How do you register for the public meeting or submit comments?
If you wish to attend this meeting, please register by email at:
BiosimilarsUserFeeProgram@fda.hhs.gov by December 14, 2011. Your email
should contain complete contact information for each attendee,
including: Name title, affiliation, address, email, address, and phone
number. Registration is free and will be on a first-come, first-served
basis. Early registration is recommended because seating is limited.
FDA may limit the number of participants from each organization based
on space limitations. Registrants will receive confirmation once they
have been accepted. On-site registration on the day of the meeting will
be based on space availability. We will try to accommodate all persons
who wish to make a presentation. If you need special accommodations
because of disability, please notify FDA by email to
BiosimilarsUserFeeProgram@fda.hhs.gov or Rokhsana Safaai-Jazi (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 4 days before the meeting.
In addition, interested persons may submit to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set
of comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed
comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document. Received comments may be
[[Page 76429]]
seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. To ensure consideration, all comments must be
received by January 6, 2012.
C. Will meeting transcripts be available?
As soon as a transcript is available, it will be accessible at
https://www.regulations.gov and https://www.fda.gov. It may be viewed at
the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). A transcript will
also be made available in either hard copy or on CD-ROM, after
submission of a Freedom of Information request. Written requests are to
be sent to Division of Freedom of Information (ELEM-1029), Food and
Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Element Bldg., Rockville, MD
20857.
IV. Additional Information on the BPCI Act
The following sources of information on FDA's Web site may serve as
useful information:
The Federal Register document that announced the November
2010 public hearing and requested public comments is available at
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-24853.pdf. (FDA has
verified the Web site address, but FDA is not responsible for any
subsequent changes to the Web site after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
Comments submitted in response to the November 2010 public
hearing document can be found at https://www.regulations.gov using
Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0477.
The Federal Register notice document that requested
notification of stakeholder intention to participate in consultation
meetings in December 2010 is available at https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-30713.pdf.
The Federal Register notice that requested input on the
comments relating to the development of a user fee program for
biosimilar and interchangeable biological product applications in May
2010 is available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-05-10/pdf/2011-11348.pdf. Additional information regarding implementation of the
BPCI Act is available at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM215031.
Dated: December 5, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-31499 Filed 12-5-11; 4:15 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P