Anchorage Regulations; Wells, ME, 76295-76297 [2011-31226]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; email: alan.strom@faa.gov; phone:
(781) 238–7143; fax: (781) 238–7199, for
more information about this AD.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
You must use BRP–Powertrain GmbH &
Co. KG, Rotax Aircraft Engines, Mandatory
Alert Service Bulletins Nos. ASB 912–059
and ASB 914–042 (combined in one
document), dated November 15, 2011, to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact BRP–Powertrain GmbH &
Co. KG, Welser Strasse 32, A–4623
Gunskirchen, Austria, or go to:
https://www.rotax-aircraft-engines.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, New England
Region, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(781) 238–7125.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 29, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Regulatory Information
On August 23, 2011, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Anchorage Regulations; Wells,
Maine’’ in the Federal Register (76 FR
52599). We received no comments on
the proposed rule. A public meeting was
not requested and none was held.
[FR Doc. 2011–31501 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[USCG–2011–0231]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Regulations; Wells, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing three special anchorage
areas in Wells Harbor, Wells, Maine.
This action is necessary to facilitate safe
navigation in that area and provide safe
and secure anchorages for vessels not
more than 20 meters in length. This
action is intended to increase the safety
of life and property in Wells Harbor,
improve the safety of anchored vessels,
and provide for the overall safe and
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
efficient flow of vessel traffic and
commerce.
DATES: This rule is effective January 6,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2011–0231 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2011–0231 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. John J. Mauro, Waterways
Management Branch Chief, First Coast
Guard District; telephone (617) 223–
8355, email John.J.Mauro@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is 33
U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030,
2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define anchorage grounds.
This rule is intended to reduce the
risk of vessel collisions by creating three
special anchorage areas in the western,
central and eastern portions of Wells
Harbor creating anchorage for
approximately 150 vessels.
Background
This rule creates three new special
anchorage areas in Wells, Maine. These
three new special anchorage areas in
Wells Harbor are described below. All
coordinates are North American Datum
1983 (NAD 83).
Vessels not more than 20 meters in
length are not required to sound signals
as per Rule 35 of the Inland Navigation
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76295
Rules (33 U.S.C. 2035) nor exhibit
anchor lights or shapes as per Rule 30
of the Inland Navigation Rules (33
U.S.C. 2030) when at anchor in a special
anchorage area. Mariners utilizing the
anchorage areas are encouraged to
contact local and state authorities, such
as the local harbormaster, to ensure
compliance with any additional
applicable state and local laws. Such
laws may involve, for example,
compliance with direction from the
local harbormaster when placing or
using moorings within the anchorage.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments on the proposed rulemaking.
We have finalized the rule as proposed,
without change.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this regulation may have
some impact on the public, the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: Normal surface
navigation will not be affected as this
area has been historically used as a
mooring field by the Town of Wells and
the number of vessels using the
anchorage is limited due to depth (less
than or equal to 18 feet).
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule could affect the following
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
76296
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
recreational and small fishing vessels
intending to anchor in Wells Harbor.
The rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: normal surface
navigation will not be affected as this
area has been historically used as a
mooring field by the Town of Wells and
the number of vessels using the
anchorage is limited due to depth (less
than or equal to 18 feet).
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–(888) 734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Civil Justice Reform
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(f) of the Instruction because it
involves the establishment of special
anchorage grounds. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 110.9 to subpart A to read as
follows:
■
§ 110.9
Wells Harbor, Maine.
(a) Anchorage ‘‘A’’. All of the waters
enclosed by a line beginning at latitude
43°19′15.7″ N, longitude 070°33′42.1″
W; thence to latitude 43°19′15.7″ N,
longitude 070°33′40.3″ W; thence to
latitude 43°19′2.6″ N, longitude
070°33′45.7″ W; thence to latitude
43°19′3.7″ N, longitude 70°33′42.6″ W;
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
thence to the point of beginning. This
area is approximately 5,800 sq. yards,
encompassing the central portion of
Wells Harbor.
(b) Anchorage ‘‘B’’. All of the waters
enclosed by a line beginning at latitude
43°19′11.1″ N, longitude 070°33′49.8″
W; thence to latitude 43°19′10.5″ N,
longitude 070°33′47.3″ W; thence to
latitude 43°19′8.7″ N, longitude
070°33′50.6″ W; thence to latitude
43°19′8.3″ N, longitude 070°33′47.3 W;
thence to the point of beginning. This
area is approximately 25,000 sq. yards,
encompassing the western portion of
Wells Harbor.
(c) Anchorage ‘‘C’’. All of the waters
enclosed by a line beginning at latitude
43°19′17.7″ N, longitude 070°33′34.0″
W; thence to latitude 43°19′18.4″ N,
longitude 070°33′32.9″ W; thence to
latitude 43°19′13.0″ N, longitude
070°33′26.2″ W; thence to latitude
43°19′13.8″ N, longitude 070°33′25.5″
W; thence to the point of beginning.
This area is approximately 8,200 sq.
yards, encompassing the eastern portion
of Wells Harbor.
(d) Regulations: This area is
principally for use by yachts and other
recreational craft. Temporary floats or
buoys for marking anchors or moorings
in place are allowed in this area. Fixed
mooring piles or stakes are not allowed.
All moorings or anchors shall be placed
well within the anchorage areas so that
no portion of the hull or rigging will at
any time extend outside of the
anchorage.
Note to § 110.9: All anchoring in the areas
is under the supervision of the Wells Harbor
Master or other such authority as may be
designated by the authorities of the Town of
Wells, Maine. All coordinates referenced use
datum: NAD 83.
Dated: November 21, 2011.
Daniel A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–31226 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1090]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Willamette River, Portland, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Dec 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
The Commander, Thirteenth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Morrison
Bridge across the Willamette River, mile
12.8, at Portland, OR. The deviation is
necessary to complete major
rehabilitation of the bridge. This
deviation allows single leaf operations
during rehabilitation and requires a two
hour advance notification for a single
leaf opening.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
6 a.m. on December 1, 2011 through
6 p.m. on May 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1090 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1090 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email the Bridge Administrator, Coast
Guard Thirteenth District; telephone
(206) 220–7282 email randall.d.
overton@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Multnomah County has requested to
operate the Morrison Bascule Bridge
with single leaf openings with two
hours advance notice. Single leaf
openings are required to facilitate major
maintenance activity and deck
rehabilitation on the bridge. The
Morrison Bridge crosses the Willamette
River at mile 12.8. The Morrison Bridge
is charted on NOAA Chart 18526 with
a vertical clearance of 69 ft above
Columbia River Datum Mean Lower
Low Water in the closed position. Under
normal operations the bridge operates
under 33 CFR 117.897 which requires a
one hour notice for openings between 8
a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays and two
hour notice for openings at all other
times. This current deviation states the
Morrison Bridge is allowed to operate
with single leaf openings. The bridge
will promptly open a single leaf when
at least two hours of advanced notice is
given. This deviation is effective from 6
a.m. on December 1, 2011 through 6
p.m. on May 27, 2012. This stretch of
the Willamette River experiences
moderate maritime traffic volumes
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76297
including vessels ranging from small
recreational craft to commercial tug and
tow. During this maintenance period a
debris containment system will be
attached to the inoperable bascule leaf
and will reduce the vertical clearance
under the inoperable leaf up to 8 ft.
Vessels which do not require a bridge
opening may continue to transit beneath
the bridge during this deviation period.
An assist tug will be provided for larger
vessels when maneuvering is
constrained by the limited opening.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: November 23, 2011.
Randall D. Overton,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–31328 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1037]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Hutchinson River, Bronx, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulation governing
the operation of the Amtrak Pelham Bay
Railroad Bridge at mile 0.5, across the
Hutchinson River at the Bronx, New
York. The deviation is necessary to
facilitate scheduled maintenance at the
bridge, pinion shaft bushing
replacement. This deviation allows the
bridge to remain in the closed position
for four days.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
4 a.m. on December 2, 2011 through
4 a.m. on December 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1037 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1037 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76295-76297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31226]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[USCG-2011-0231]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations; Wells, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing three special anchorage areas
in Wells Harbor, Wells, Maine. This action is necessary to facilitate
safe navigation in that area and provide safe and secure anchorages for
vessels not more than 20 meters in length. This action is intended to
increase the safety of life and property in Wells Harbor, improve the
safety of anchored vessels, and provide for the overall safe and
efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce.
DATES: This rule is effective January 6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2011-0231 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0231 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. John J. Mauro, Waterways Management Branch Chief,
First Coast Guard District; telephone (617) 223-8355, email
John.J.Mauro@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On August 23, 2011, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Anchorage Regulations; Wells, Maine'' in the Federal
Register (76 FR 52599). We received no comments on the proposed rule. A
public meeting was not requested and none was held.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236,
2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to
define anchorage grounds.
This rule is intended to reduce the risk of vessel collisions by
creating three special anchorage areas in the western, central and
eastern portions of Wells Harbor creating anchorage for approximately
150 vessels.
Background
This rule creates three new special anchorage areas in Wells,
Maine. These three new special anchorage areas in Wells Harbor are
described below. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983 (NAD
83).
Vessels not more than 20 meters in length are not required to sound
signals as per Rule 35 of the Inland Navigation Rules (33 U.S.C. 2035)
nor exhibit anchor lights or shapes as per Rule 30 of the Inland
Navigation Rules (33 U.S.C. 2030) when at anchor in a special anchorage
area. Mariners utilizing the anchorage areas are encouraged to contact
local and state authorities, such as the local harbormaster, to ensure
compliance with any additional applicable state and local laws. Such
laws may involve, for example, compliance with direction from the local
harbormaster when placing or using moorings within the anchorage.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments on the proposed rulemaking. We
have finalized the rule as proposed, without change.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
Although this regulation may have some impact on the public, the
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: Normal
surface navigation will not be affected as this area has been
historically used as a mooring field by the Town of Wells and the
number of vessels using the anchorage is limited due to depth (less
than or equal to 18 feet).
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule could affect the following
[[Page 76296]]
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of recreational and small fishing vessels intending to anchor
in Wells Harbor. The rule will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons:
normal surface navigation will not be affected as this area has been
historically used as a mooring field by the Town of Wells and the
number of vessels using the anchorage is limited due to depth (less
than or equal to 18 feet).
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(f) of the Instruction because it involves the
establishment of special anchorage grounds. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071;
33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 110.9 to subpart A to read as follows:
Sec. 110.9 Wells Harbor, Maine.
(a) Anchorage ``A''. All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning
at latitude 43[deg]19'15.7'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'42.1'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'15.7'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'40.3'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'2.6'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'45.7'' W; thence to
latitude 43[deg]19'3.7'' N, longitude 70[deg]33'42.6'' W;
[[Page 76297]]
thence to the point of beginning. This area is approximately 5,800 sq.
yards, encompassing the central portion of Wells Harbor.
(b) Anchorage ``B''. All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning
at latitude 43[deg]19'11.1'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'49.8'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'10.5'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'47.3'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'8.7'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'50.6'' W; thence to
latitude 43[deg]19'8.3'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'47.3 W; thence to the
point of beginning. This area is approximately 25,000 sq. yards,
encompassing the western portion of Wells Harbor.
(c) Anchorage ``C''. All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning
at latitude 43[deg]19'17.7'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'34.0'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'18.4'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'32.9'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'13.0'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'26.2'' W; thence
to latitude 43[deg]19'13.8'' N, longitude 070[deg]33'25.5'' W; thence
to the point of beginning. This area is approximately 8,200 sq. yards,
encompassing the eastern portion of Wells Harbor.
(d) Regulations: This area is principally for use by yachts and
other recreational craft. Temporary floats or buoys for marking anchors
or moorings in place are allowed in this area. Fixed mooring piles or
stakes are not allowed. All moorings or anchors shall be placed well
within the anchorage areas so that no portion of the hull or rigging
will at any time extend outside of the anchorage.
Note to Sec. 110.9: All anchoring in the areas is under the
supervision of the Wells Harbor Master or other such authority as
may be designated by the authorities of the Town of Wells, Maine.
All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD 83.
Dated: November 21, 2011.
Daniel A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011-31226 Filed 12-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P